Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

THE TRUTH MATTERS: The Daily Mail faced MASSIVE BACKLASH last night after running a misleading headline on the Kirk assassination case, and RIGHTFULLY SO. Now the ACTUAL FACTS are exposing the spin. In their latest motion, Tyler Robinson's defense team is challenging a bullet fragment recovered during the autopsy....

GuntherEagleman's profile picture

Gunther Eagleman™

1,718,910 subscribers

62,658 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

KomediHaberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️
3:39

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

67,807 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

A new court filing reveals defense attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk, claim an ATF analysis could not conclusively connect the bullet that killed Kirk to the gun Robinson allegedly used. Now the lawyers are asking to delay Robinson's preliminary hearing to review the evidence. CBS News' Carter Evans has more.
0:56

A new court filing reveals defense attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk, claim an ATF analysis could not conclusively connect the bullet that killed Kirk to the gun Robinson allegedly used. Now the lawyers are asking to delay Robinson's preliminary hearing to review the evidence. CBS News' Carter Evans has more.

CBS News

22,202 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: The judge in the Charlie Kirk murder case has ruled there IS enough probable cause to bring Tyler Robinson to trial Judge Graf made clear the evidence is OVERWHELMING, saying it supports a "reasonable belief that the defendant is the individual who shot and killed Charlie Kirk" JUDGE GRAF: "Defendant's DNA was identified as a MAJOR contributor on multiple key components of the firearm, including the stock, grips, butt plate, the trigger and trigger guard." "This physical evidence is corroborated by the tool mark analysis, which matches the engraving cutter recovered from the defendant's residence to the cartridge causing casing and live ammunition found within the Mauser rifle." "Furthermore, the FBI DNA analysis places defendant's DNA on a screwdriver recovered at the crime scene with a likelihood ratio exceeding 30 QUINTILLION." The judge also said the video evidence of Robinson's vehicle, his text messages to his boyfriend, and other surveillance send this FAR beyond probable cause.
4:36

🚨 BREAKING: The judge in the Charlie Kirk murder case has ruled there IS enough probable cause to bring Tyler Robinson to trial Judge Graf made clear the evidence is OVERWHELMING, saying it supports a "reasonable belief that the defendant is the individual who shot and killed Charlie Kirk" JUDGE GRAF: "Defendant's DNA was identified as a MAJOR contributor on multiple key components of the firearm, including the stock, grips, butt plate, the trigger and trigger guard." "This physical evidence is corroborated by the tool mark analysis, which matches the engraving cutter recovered from the defendant's residence to the cartridge causing casing and live ammunition found within the Mauser rifle." "Furthermore, the FBI DNA analysis places defendant's DNA on a screwdriver recovered at the crime scene with a likelihood ratio exceeding 30 QUINTILLION." The judge also said the video evidence of Robinson's vehicle, his text messages to his boyfriend, and other surveillance send this FAR beyond probable cause.

Nick Sortor

323,900 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

🚨 BOMBSHELL: New Court Documents In Tyler Robinson Trial PROVE The Fragment Recovered From Charlie's Neck DOESN'T MATCH. The Rifle Record At The Scene—The Narrative Just COLLAPSED😱 A bombshell new forensic court filing has just dropped in the Tyler Robinson case, and it completely obliterates the establishment's "lone gunman" timeline. The official ballistics do NOT match the gun found at the scene. According to the newly released court motion, the ATF’s forensic testing on the bullet jacket fragments recovered from Charlie Kirk’s neck during the autopsy came back inconclusive. They could not link the fragments to the rifle they desperately want to pin on Tyler Robinson. The defense is officially preparing to use the ATF's own firearm analysis as exculpatory evidence. Remember how the local police and the K9 units scoured the area and found absolutely nothing, only for the FBI to swoop in later and magically point to the exact spot the gun was hiding? Tyler's own grandmother has publicly stated he didn't even own a gun. Now, this same court filing reveals that multiple different DNA profiles were found on the evidence, including the rifle. It is the definition of a planted weapon. Here is the reality they are terrified to admit: The fragments found in Charlie's neck don't match the rifle because they aren't from a conventional sniper bullet at all. They are fragments from the device exploding. That is why there was no exit wound, and that is exactly why the ATF's toolmark analysis failed. The state is trying to stall by drowning the defense in 20,000 electronic files and audio recordings, but the truth is already out. Tyler Robinson is a patsy, the crime scene was deeply compromised by the Feds, and the real assassins are still being protected. Share this everywhere. The cover-up is unraveling in real-time. 💪🇺🇸 Article from: Daily Mail
5:10

🚨 BOMBSHELL: New Court Documents In Tyler Robinson Trial PROVE The Fragment Recovered From Charlie's Neck DOESN'T MATCH. The Rifle Record At The Scene—The Narrative Just COLLAPSED😱 A bombshell new forensic court filing has just dropped in the Tyler Robinson case, and it completely obliterates the establishment's "lone gunman" timeline. The official ballistics do NOT match the gun found at the scene. According to the newly released court motion, the ATF’s forensic testing on the bullet jacket fragments recovered from Charlie Kirk’s neck during the autopsy came back inconclusive. They could not link the fragments to the rifle they desperately want to pin on Tyler Robinson. The defense is officially preparing to use the ATF's own firearm analysis as exculpatory evidence. Remember how the local police and the K9 units scoured the area and found absolutely nothing, only for the FBI to swoop in later and magically point to the exact spot the gun was hiding? Tyler's own grandmother has publicly stated he didn't even own a gun. Now, this same court filing reveals that multiple different DNA profiles were found on the evidence, including the rifle. It is the definition of a planted weapon. Here is the reality they are terrified to admit: The fragments found in Charlie's neck don't match the rifle because they aren't from a conventional sniper bullet at all. They are fragments from the device exploding. That is why there was no exit wound, and that is exactly why the ATF's toolmark analysis failed. The state is trying to stall by drowning the defense in 20,000 electronic files and audio recordings, but the truth is already out. Tyler Robinson is a patsy, the crime scene was deeply compromised by the Feds, and the real assassins are still being protected. Share this everywhere. The cover-up is unraveling in real-time. 💪🇺🇸 Article from: Daily Mail

Project Constitution

290,536 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?
2:03

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?

HustleBitch

23,204 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: New Forensic Filing PROVES The BULLET DOES NOT MATCH THE GUN Found At The Scene That Allegedly Belongs To Tyler Robinson🤯 The establishment’s "open and shut case" just completely collapsed. A new filing has just been made public regarding the ATF forensic testing in the Charlie Kirk assassination, and it is the ultimate proof that Tyler Robinson is nothing more than a government patsy. Here is the breaking evidence the mainstream media is trying to spin: THE BALLISTICS FAILED TO MATCH: According to the official court filings, the ATF tested the bullet jacket fragments recovered from Charlie Kirk’s neck during the autopsy. The result? The conventional toolmark analysis failed to link those fragments to the rifle found at the scene—the exact rifle the Feds claim belonged to Tyler Robinson. The results were officially "inconclusive," meaning there is zero forensic proof that the bullet that killed Charlie came from that gun. THE GOVERNMENT PANIC: Now that the initial forensics have failed to connect their hand-picked patsy to the murder weapon, the state is panicking. They are desperately trying to force a "re-testing" using different chemical methods because they know they have no case. Tyler’s defense is rightfully objecting to this, because the current results already do exactly what they are supposed to do: they exonerate him. THE FRAGMENTATION COVER-UP: They are trying to use the excuse of "bullet fragmentation" to explain away why there was no exit wound and why the ballistics don't match. But we know the truth. The Feds planted a weapon, pointed the finger at a terrified kid who was coerced into surrendering, and are now scrambling because the physical science doesn't back up their lies. Tyler Robinson did NOT shoot Charlie Kirk. This was a highly coordinated hit, and our own government is working overtime to protect the real assassins while railroading an innocent scapegoat. The entire official narrative is a lie. 🇺🇸⚓️
2:22

🚨 BREAKING: New Forensic Filing PROVES The BULLET DOES NOT MATCH THE GUN Found At The Scene That Allegedly Belongs To Tyler Robinson🤯 The establishment’s "open and shut case" just completely collapsed. A new filing has just been made public regarding the ATF forensic testing in the Charlie Kirk assassination, and it is the ultimate proof that Tyler Robinson is nothing more than a government patsy. Here is the breaking evidence the mainstream media is trying to spin: THE BALLISTICS FAILED TO MATCH: According to the official court filings, the ATF tested the bullet jacket fragments recovered from Charlie Kirk’s neck during the autopsy. The result? The conventional toolmark analysis failed to link those fragments to the rifle found at the scene—the exact rifle the Feds claim belonged to Tyler Robinson. The results were officially "inconclusive," meaning there is zero forensic proof that the bullet that killed Charlie came from that gun. THE GOVERNMENT PANIC: Now that the initial forensics have failed to connect their hand-picked patsy to the murder weapon, the state is panicking. They are desperately trying to force a "re-testing" using different chemical methods because they know they have no case. Tyler’s defense is rightfully objecting to this, because the current results already do exactly what they are supposed to do: they exonerate him. THE FRAGMENTATION COVER-UP: They are trying to use the excuse of "bullet fragmentation" to explain away why there was no exit wound and why the ballistics don't match. But we know the truth. The Feds planted a weapon, pointed the finger at a terrified kid who was coerced into surrendering, and are now scrambling because the physical science doesn't back up their lies. Tyler Robinson did NOT shoot Charlie Kirk. This was a highly coordinated hit, and our own government is working overtime to protect the real assassins while railroading an innocent scapegoat. The entire official narrative is a lie. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

101,579 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

And this is where Candace loses: If the defense could adduce evidence of fabricated documents, conspiracy, fake messages… they would not do it at the preliminary hearing for probable cause, but would wait until the trial? That the defense was precluded from adducing such evidence at the preliminary hearing? Absolute nonsense. True, it is not the trial. But there is no realm of the universe in which the defense would not attempt to adduce evidence - to the extent that you could, either through cross or direct - of fabricated / falsified text messages, manufactured documents and/or conspiracy to frame. They were not prevented from doing so at the preliminary hearing. They simply did not present anything to suggest the messages were fabricated, that a bullet did not kill Charlie, and other elements that, if remotely demonstratable, would easily be an obstacle for even the lower threshold of probable cause. And that is exactly why they could not deny them in their latest filing.
1:59

And this is where Candace loses: If the defense could adduce evidence of fabricated documents, conspiracy, fake messages… they would not do it at the preliminary hearing for probable cause, but would wait until the trial? That the defense was precluded from adducing such evidence at the preliminary hearing? Absolute nonsense. True, it is not the trial. But there is no realm of the universe in which the defense would not attempt to adduce evidence - to the extent that you could, either through cross or direct - of fabricated / falsified text messages, manufactured documents and/or conspiracy to frame. They were not prevented from doing so at the preliminary hearing. They simply did not present anything to suggest the messages were fabricated, that a bullet did not kill Charlie, and other elements that, if remotely demonstratable, would easily be an obstacle for even the lower threshold of probable cause. And that is exactly why they could not deny them in their latest filing.

Viva Frei

60,571 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

New testimony is shedding more light on the case surrounding Charlie Kirk's killing. During a five-day preliminary hearing in Utah, accused assassin Tyler Robinson's former roommate and former lover testified that Robinson confessed to killing Kirk and had been engraving bullets for up to a month before the shooting. Prosecutors also unveiled the rifle investigators believe was used in the attack. Experts testified that DNA linked to Robinson was found on the firearm, while the defense argued the evidence does not conclusively tie the weapon to the killing. Matt Finn breaks down the key moments from court.
1:05

New testimony is shedding more light on the case surrounding Charlie Kirk's killing. During a five-day preliminary hearing in Utah, accused assassin Tyler Robinson's former roommate and former lover testified that Robinson confessed to killing Kirk and had been engraving bullets for up to a month before the shooting. Prosecutors also unveiled the rifle investigators believe was used in the attack. Experts testified that DNA linked to Robinson was found on the firearm, while the defense argued the evidence does not conclusively tie the weapon to the killing. Matt Finn breaks down the key moments from court.

Fox News

121,382 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨Candace Owens for nearly a year: “There's NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE against Tyler Robinson" VS. Judge Tony Graf today: "The state's evidence is SUBSTANTIAL” The judge outlined: • Robinson's DNA identified as a major contributor on multiple parts of the alleged murder weapon • Toolmark evidence connecting an engraving cutter recovered from Robinson's residence to ammunition found in the rifle • Robinson's DNA on the screwdriver recovered from the crime scene • Surveillance tracking a suspect matching Robinson's physical attributes, clothing, shoes and distinctive gait to and from the rooftop • Doorbell footage allegedly capturing Robinson's distinctive vehicle nearby • Messages attributed to Robinson allegedly admitting: “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I took it.” • A subsequent Discord message allegedly stating: “It was me at UVU yesterday.” The judge's conclusion: “This evidence is sufficient at this stage to support a reasonable belief that defendant is the individual who shot and killed Charlie Kirk.” Candace Owens and her cult actively refuse to live in the real world.
2:46

🚨Candace Owens for nearly a year: “There's NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE against Tyler Robinson" VS. Judge Tony Graf today: "The state's evidence is SUBSTANTIAL” The judge outlined: • Robinson's DNA identified as a major contributor on multiple parts of the alleged murder weapon • Toolmark evidence connecting an engraving cutter recovered from Robinson's residence to ammunition found in the rifle • Robinson's DNA on the screwdriver recovered from the crime scene • Surveillance tracking a suspect matching Robinson's physical attributes, clothing, shoes and distinctive gait to and from the rooftop • Doorbell footage allegedly capturing Robinson's distinctive vehicle nearby • Messages attributed to Robinson allegedly admitting: “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I took it.” • A subsequent Discord message allegedly stating: “It was me at UVU yesterday.” The judge's conclusion: “This evidence is sufficient at this stage to support a reasonable belief that defendant is the individual who shot and killed Charlie Kirk.” Candace Owens and her cult actively refuse to live in the real world.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

128,970 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge something stunning. The FBI and ATF claimed Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition casings and multiple towels. The prosecution never turned that evidence over. Not in physical form. Not in digital form. None of it. Is that because it doesn’t exist? The attempted assassination of a sitting president. And the DNA evidence cited in the probable cause statement was never produced. Questions that deserve answers.
0:58

Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge something stunning. The FBI and ATF claimed Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition casings and multiple towels. The prosecution never turned that evidence over. Not in physical form. Not in digital form. None of it. Is that because it doesn’t exist? The attempted assassination of a sitting president. And the DNA evidence cited in the probable cause statement was never produced. Questions that deserve answers.

Brian Allen

172,400 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨MY THOUGHTS After Day 1 of the Preliminary Trial: Sitting in the courtroom for the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is a completely different experience than watching clips online. Seeing the defendant, hearing the testimony firsthand, and watching the evidence unfold in real time reinforces why due process matters. The State has presented evidence it argues establishes probable cause, the defense is doing its job by challenging that evidence, and the hearing is far from over. If you're following this case, watch the proceedings yourself instead of relying on social media narratives.
4:49

🚨MY THOUGHTS After Day 1 of the Preliminary Trial: Sitting in the courtroom for the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is a completely different experience than watching clips online. Seeing the defendant, hearing the testimony firsthand, and watching the evidence unfold in real time reinforces why due process matters. The State has presented evidence it argues establishes probable cause, the defense is doing its job by challenging that evidence, and the hearing is far from over. If you're following this case, watch the proceedings yourself instead of relying on social media narratives.

Brandon Tatum

196,202 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.
1:59

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

Liz Wheeler

46,506 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨Daily Mail ran a MISLEADING headline about the Tyler Robinson case to farm clicks… They imply the bullet didn’t match the suspect’s rifle, but buried in the article is the truth: the bullet was too fragmented to match any weapon. That’s not “bombshell” evidence, that’s basic forensic reality. Stop falling for headline manipulation.
7:26

🚨Daily Mail ran a MISLEADING headline about the Tyler Robinson case to farm clicks… They imply the bullet didn’t match the suspect’s rifle, but buried in the article is the truth: the bullet was too fragmented to match any weapon. That’s not “bombshell” evidence, that’s basic forensic reality. Stop falling for headline manipulation.

Brandon Tatum

39,671 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🆘EXPOSED: ATF Report Released In New Defense MOTION In Tyler Robinson Case —Proof The FBI is DESPERATE to Destroy their PLANTED Evidence 👀 The "Magic Bullet" narrative just took a catastrophic hit, and the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. We already know the official timeline is built on manufactured evidence. We caught them with the mathematically impossible 7:57 PM Discord confession. We caught them passing off AI-enhanced stairwell photos. We caught them lying about the 9:00 AM doorbell camera timeline thanks to Baron Coleman’s shadow analysis. Now, we have obtained a new legal motion from Tyler Robinson’s defense team regarding the alleged bullet fragment pulled from Charlie Kirk’s body, and the level of federal fuckery is breathtaking. Let’s break down exactly why they are lying to you and why this document actually destroys their entire narrative and how the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. 1⃣ The State claims Charlie Kirk was killed by a .30-06 round from a Mauser rifle. But the newly revealed ATF lab report from September 17, 2025, destroys that theory entirely. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. The ATF explicitly wrote: "Firearms that produce general rifling characteristics similar to those observed on the Exhibit 6A bullet jacket fragment include numerous makes and models." It doesn't prove it came from Tyler's rifle. It proves the fragment is a planted prop designed to roughly match the narrative of the gun they are framing the patsy with, without ever providing a definitive "Source Identification." 2⃣ The ATF Admits It’s a Bust: The ATF examined the deformed bullet jacket fragment (Exhibit 6A) recovered from the autopsy. Their official conclusion? Inconclusive. The fragment could not be identified or excluded as having been fired from the Exhibit 1 Mauser rifle. The rifling characteristics observed on the fragment match "numerous makes and models" of firearms. There was neither sufficient agreement nor sufficient disagreement of individual characteristics to link it to the weapon. 3⃣ Because the ATF report is exculpatory, the State is now moving the fragment to the FBI lab for Virtual Comparison Microscopy (VCM). But here is the insane part: the FBI examiner admitted the fragment is "fragile". To scan it, the FBI claims it may be necessary to use pliers or similar gripping tools to fold back portions of the jacket. The FBI noted that when they received the fragment from the ATF, a small portion was already detached, implying the ATF already bent and altered the evidence. The FBI admitted that using pliers could leave marks and that it is possible additional pieces of the fragment may inadvertently become detached. 4⃣ Tyler Robinson's defense team naturally asked to have their own expert present for this highly destructive process, or at the very least, to have the FBI videotape the examination. The FBI's response? Absolutely not. Their policies do not allow a defense examiner to be present or for the examination to be videotaped. The Reality Check 🧨 Why is the FBI so desperate to take a pair of pliers to a fragile piece of evidence behind closed doors without any cameras rolling? Because they know the fragment doesn't match the rifle. As we have extensively documented, the physics of the wound channel and the lack of a massive exit wound strongly suggest Charlie wasn't hit with a .30-06 bullet at all. The evidence points to a PETN explosive that detonated under his shirt and propelled into his neck. If Charlie was killed by a planted explosive device, then this "fragment" was staged. And now, the FBI is using the guise of "forensic testing" to permanently alter and destroy the fragment with pliers before an independent defense expert can examine it. They are manufacturing the crime scene right in front of us. 👇 SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE. Demand that the FBI drop the pliers and allow independent testing.
0:50

🆘EXPOSED: ATF Report Released In New Defense MOTION In Tyler Robinson Case —Proof The FBI is DESPERATE to Destroy their PLANTED Evidence 👀 The "Magic Bullet" narrative just took a catastrophic hit, and the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. We already know the official timeline is built on manufactured evidence. We caught them with the mathematically impossible 7:57 PM Discord confession. We caught them passing off AI-enhanced stairwell photos. We caught them lying about the 9:00 AM doorbell camera timeline thanks to Baron Coleman’s shadow analysis. Now, we have obtained a new legal motion from Tyler Robinson’s defense team regarding the alleged bullet fragment pulled from Charlie Kirk’s body, and the level of federal fuckery is breathtaking. Let’s break down exactly why they are lying to you and why this document actually destroys their entire narrative and how the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. 1⃣ The State claims Charlie Kirk was killed by a .30-06 round from a Mauser rifle. But the newly revealed ATF lab report from September 17, 2025, destroys that theory entirely. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. The ATF explicitly wrote: "Firearms that produce general rifling characteristics similar to those observed on the Exhibit 6A bullet jacket fragment include numerous makes and models." It doesn't prove it came from Tyler's rifle. It proves the fragment is a planted prop designed to roughly match the narrative of the gun they are framing the patsy with, without ever providing a definitive "Source Identification." 2⃣ The ATF Admits It’s a Bust: The ATF examined the deformed bullet jacket fragment (Exhibit 6A) recovered from the autopsy. Their official conclusion? Inconclusive. The fragment could not be identified or excluded as having been fired from the Exhibit 1 Mauser rifle. The rifling characteristics observed on the fragment match "numerous makes and models" of firearms. There was neither sufficient agreement nor sufficient disagreement of individual characteristics to link it to the weapon. 3⃣ Because the ATF report is exculpatory, the State is now moving the fragment to the FBI lab for Virtual Comparison Microscopy (VCM). But here is the insane part: the FBI examiner admitted the fragment is "fragile". To scan it, the FBI claims it may be necessary to use pliers or similar gripping tools to fold back portions of the jacket. The FBI noted that when they received the fragment from the ATF, a small portion was already detached, implying the ATF already bent and altered the evidence. The FBI admitted that using pliers could leave marks and that it is possible additional pieces of the fragment may inadvertently become detached. 4⃣ Tyler Robinson's defense team naturally asked to have their own expert present for this highly destructive process, or at the very least, to have the FBI videotape the examination. The FBI's response? Absolutely not. Their policies do not allow a defense examiner to be present or for the examination to be videotaped. The Reality Check 🧨 Why is the FBI so desperate to take a pair of pliers to a fragile piece of evidence behind closed doors without any cameras rolling? Because they know the fragment doesn't match the rifle. As we have extensively documented, the physics of the wound channel and the lack of a massive exit wound strongly suggest Charlie wasn't hit with a .30-06 bullet at all. The evidence points to a PETN explosive that detonated under his shirt and propelled into his neck. If Charlie was killed by a planted explosive device, then this "fragment" was staged. And now, the FBI is using the guise of "forensic testing" to permanently alter and destroy the fragment with pliers before an independent defense expert can examine it. They are manufacturing the crime scene right in front of us. 👇 SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE. Demand that the FBI drop the pliers and allow independent testing.

Project Constitution

52,190 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.
2:02

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

Liz Wheeler

19,316 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨MUST WATCH: The Massive DNA Bombshell TPUSA DOESN'T Want You To Know—FIVE Different Persons Mixed DNA Was Recovered From The Charlie Kirk Crime Scene🤯⚖️ Turning Point USA and their army of proxy shills are working overtime to gaslight the American public. They are desperate to make you blindly believe that the assassination of Charlie Kirk is an "open and shut case." They want you to accept the narrative that they have a lone gunman dead to rights. But the truth is the exact opposite. Tonight, Candace Owens dropped another massive bombshell directly from the Tyler Robinson court filings, and it completely obliterates the state's manufactured storyline. THE MIXED DNA BOMBSHELL: TPUSA wants you to think the physical evidence points neatly and exclusively to one 22-year-old kid. Here is the reality buried in the legal documents: The FBI and ATF reports explicitly indicate that they recovered minute quantities of DNA on various items of evidence consisting of mixtures of up to FIVE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS. Let that sink in. At least five different people's DNA was recovered from the evidence, all mixed together. This was not a pristine, lone-wolf crime scene. This was a highly contaminated scene, handled by multiple unknown actors. Who are the other four people? Why is the media silent about them? HIDING THE HOMEWORK: So how is the prosecution handling this explosive revelation? By actively hiding the details from the defense. The state has indicated it intends to offer this DNA report at the preliminary hearing without any supporting expert testimony. Even worse, they are refusing to hand over the raw data. They are only providing a "summary" conclusion. They are effectively telling the defense: There are at least five people's DNA on this evidence, but we aren't going to tell you who they are, we aren't going to show you how we tested it, and we aren't going to let your experts look at the actual data. Just take our word for it. THE SHILL NARRATIVE COLLAPSES: Let's review the actual facts of this "open and shut" case: A suspect who plead NOT GUILTY. An ATF ballistics report that failed to match the bullet fragment to the rifle. A desperate FBI trying to resurrect banned, 20-year-old "junk science" to force a match. And now, evidence covered in the DNA of five or more unidentified individuals. There is absolutely no ironclad forensic evidence tying Tyler Robinson to this crime. What there is, is a staggering amount of reasonable doubt. Do not let TPUSA lie to you. Do not let their paid mouthpieces manipulate you into accepting a manufactured conclusion. They are terrified of what a real, independent investigation into those five DNA profiles will uncover. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL podcast below. 👇
0:53

🚨MUST WATCH: The Massive DNA Bombshell TPUSA DOESN'T Want You To Know—FIVE Different Persons Mixed DNA Was Recovered From The Charlie Kirk Crime Scene🤯⚖️ Turning Point USA and their army of proxy shills are working overtime to gaslight the American public. They are desperate to make you blindly believe that the assassination of Charlie Kirk is an "open and shut case." They want you to accept the narrative that they have a lone gunman dead to rights. But the truth is the exact opposite. Tonight, Candace Owens dropped another massive bombshell directly from the Tyler Robinson court filings, and it completely obliterates the state's manufactured storyline. THE MIXED DNA BOMBSHELL: TPUSA wants you to think the physical evidence points neatly and exclusively to one 22-year-old kid. Here is the reality buried in the legal documents: The FBI and ATF reports explicitly indicate that they recovered minute quantities of DNA on various items of evidence consisting of mixtures of up to FIVE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS. Let that sink in. At least five different people's DNA was recovered from the evidence, all mixed together. This was not a pristine, lone-wolf crime scene. This was a highly contaminated scene, handled by multiple unknown actors. Who are the other four people? Why is the media silent about them? HIDING THE HOMEWORK: So how is the prosecution handling this explosive revelation? By actively hiding the details from the defense. The state has indicated it intends to offer this DNA report at the preliminary hearing without any supporting expert testimony. Even worse, they are refusing to hand over the raw data. They are only providing a "summary" conclusion. They are effectively telling the defense: There are at least five people's DNA on this evidence, but we aren't going to tell you who they are, we aren't going to show you how we tested it, and we aren't going to let your experts look at the actual data. Just take our word for it. THE SHILL NARRATIVE COLLAPSES: Let's review the actual facts of this "open and shut" case: A suspect who plead NOT GUILTY. An ATF ballistics report that failed to match the bullet fragment to the rifle. A desperate FBI trying to resurrect banned, 20-year-old "junk science" to force a match. And now, evidence covered in the DNA of five or more unidentified individuals. There is absolutely no ironclad forensic evidence tying Tyler Robinson to this crime. What there is, is a staggering amount of reasonable doubt. Do not let TPUSA lie to you. Do not let their paid mouthpieces manipulate you into accepting a manufactured conclusion. They are terrified of what a real, independent investigation into those five DNA profiles will uncover. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

12,213 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

‼️🇺🇸: DEFENSE REVEALS THAT GUN & SCREWDRIVER "DNA EVIDENCE" IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION IS MIXED FROM 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE 👀 During the Tyler Robinson hearing on replacing the prosecution, prosecutors called a lead agent who claimed DNA evidence was from Tyler Robinson. HOWEVER the agent decided TO NOT MENTION that the DNA evidence they collected was a mixture of 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE'S DNA. What is going on here!? 🤨
0:32

‼️🇺🇸: DEFENSE REVEALS THAT GUN & SCREWDRIVER "DNA EVIDENCE" IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION IS MIXED FROM 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE 👀 During the Tyler Robinson hearing on replacing the prosecution, prosecutors called a lead agent who claimed DNA evidence was from Tyler Robinson. HOWEVER the agent decided TO NOT MENTION that the DNA evidence they collected was a mixture of 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE'S DNA. What is going on here!? 🤨

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

741,747 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge that while the FBI and ATF claimed in the probable cause statement that Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition round casings, and multiple towels, the prosecution never turned that evidence over, in physical or digital form, to the defense. Is that because it doesn’t exist? More conspiracy theories claiming that Trump staged his own assassination attempt will surely arise from this.
0:58

BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge that while the FBI and ATF claimed in the probable cause statement that Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition round casings, and multiple towels, the prosecution never turned that evidence over, in physical or digital form, to the defense. Is that because it doesn’t exist? More conspiracy theories claiming that Trump staged his own assassination attempt will surely arise from this.

Ed Krassenstein

1,139,926 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE in the Charlie Kirk Murder Case, Tyler Robinson is TOAST Preliminary hearing just wrapped and the case against Tyler Robinson is ironclad. DNA, ballistics, fingerprints on the window, admissions, motive, video, everything prosecutors dream of. As one analyst put it: “It’s one of the best murder cases one could dream of.” The hearing ran long not because the state was weak, they went above and beyond to lay it all out and crush the wild conspiracy theories swirling online. Don Jr. was convinced after day one. The evidence is already at beyond a reasonable doubt territory. Smart move by Erika Kirk and the prosecution: let the courtroom do what it does best, focus on truth and evidence, not the wacky profit-driven nonsense peddled for clicks. Defense didn’t touch any of those digital conspiracies. Why? Because in a real courtroom, you get challenged, your bar card gets threatened, and fairy tales die under cross-examination. This is exactly why we have courts. To separate facts from fiction. The state put on a masterclass dispelling the garbage. Justice is coming. No escape for the guilty.
4:55

🚨 OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE in the Charlie Kirk Murder Case, Tyler Robinson is TOAST Preliminary hearing just wrapped and the case against Tyler Robinson is ironclad. DNA, ballistics, fingerprints on the window, admissions, motive, video, everything prosecutors dream of. As one analyst put it: “It’s one of the best murder cases one could dream of.” The hearing ran long not because the state was weak, they went above and beyond to lay it all out and crush the wild conspiracy theories swirling online. Don Jr. was convinced after day one. The evidence is already at beyond a reasonable doubt territory. Smart move by Erika Kirk and the prosecution: let the courtroom do what it does best, focus on truth and evidence, not the wacky profit-driven nonsense peddled for clicks. Defense didn’t touch any of those digital conspiracies. Why? Because in a real courtroom, you get challenged, your bar card gets threatened, and fairy tales die under cross-examination. This is exactly why we have courts. To separate facts from fiction. The state put on a masterclass dispelling the garbage. Justice is coming. No escape for the guilty.

Gunther Eagleman™

30,553 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?
2:20

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?

HustleBitch

23,159 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce