Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The Uniform Civil Code is unacceptable as it goes against the fundamental rights granted in the Constitution, and it is detrimental to the unity and integrity of the country. We (Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind) have already approached the court against the decision to implement the Uniform Civil Code in Uttarakhand with... the hope of receiving justice in order to uphold the Constitution of the country, democracy, and the supremacy of law. As our Constitution guarantees Right to Freedom in article 25, 26 and 29 while recognizing the fundamental rights of citizens, and the Muslim Personal Law is also protected under the Shariat Application Act of 1937. Hence, We will not accept any law that is against Shariah. Muslims can compromise on things, but they can never compromise on their Shariah and Religion. #UniformCivilCode #UCCshow more

Arshad Madani

342,354 subscribers

48,338 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Sanjay1 year ago

समझौता तो करना पड़ेगा ,नही करोगे तो जाओ पाकिस्तान, क्योंकि तुम्हारे पूर्वज धर्म के नाम पर एक अलग राष्ट्र ले चुके है,जब हिस्सा ले चुके हो तब यहा क्या काम ?

𓆩Mr. Tweet𓆪 1 year ago

What’s yout opinion on article 44? I think next move is NRC then kaunsa article ya act ke against jaate?

𝕋𝕚𝕘𝕖𝕣 𝕞𝕒𝕕𝕙𝕦𝕜𝕒𝕟𝕥1 year ago

tere bhokne se ek suwar nahi marta , or tu bat vakf bord ki kar raha hai madni !!! bjp wala issh bar sabko sadh dega !!!

दया शंकर1 year ago

मदनी को सरिया चाहिए 🤣 हिंदुस्तान छोड़ दे मदनी , यहां सरिया नहीं मिल सकती , भाव ज्यादा है 🤣

Ulama-e-suu1 year ago

I have a dream. Where our leading ulama says we dont accpet uniform code bcoz its against Islam. Come what may be the consequences. Place 30crore Muslims in ja1ls or martyr.

Swaraj1 year ago

UCC संविधान की अनुसूची मे है, कोर्ट भी कुछ नही कर सकता.

The Liberation Project1 year ago

𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝟏𝟎 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐒 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳. ★ READ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Rajeev Saxena1 year ago

If you want Sharia, move to Pakistan or Bangladesh

Watcher1 year ago

No shariat in post partition Hindustan.

Babai0071 year ago

Go to pakistan

J H U T !.€®™1 year ago

Ganga Jamuna gang SAARE FASAAD ki jad hai

Related Videos

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

Arshad Madani

70,843 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On Maharashtra Uniform Civil Code (UCC) committee, Union Minister Ramdas Athawale says, “Uniform Civil Code has been passed in many other states. I feel that this law will end the very reason behind the clash between Hindus and Muslims… This law is not anti-Muslim… The UCC will also benefit the Muslim community, and it can also be used well to control population… So, I think that the Muslim community should not go against the UCC… My party is in favour of the UCC.”

#WATCH | Delhi | On Maharashtra Uniform Civil Code (UCC) committee, Union Minister Ramdas Athawale says, “Uniform Civil Code has been passed in many other states. I feel that this law will end the very reason behind the clash between Hindus and Muslims… This law is not anti-Muslim… The UCC will also benefit the Muslim community, and it can also be used well to control population… So, I think that the Muslim community should not go against the UCC… My party is in favour of the UCC.”

ANI

23,570 views • 1 month ago

Pardoning people that did this to the Nigeria army is a crime against humanity and treason against Nigeria's constitution!! How can a Nation pardon those whose ideology and objective is to overthrow the Constitution of the same country and institute sharia , a law that is opposite to the constitution of the country ? Is it that Nigeria has been destroyed and given out from the inside out ? We want peace in Nigeria and religious tolerance!

Pardoning people that did this to the Nigeria army is a crime against humanity and treason against Nigeria's constitution!! How can a Nation pardon those whose ideology and objective is to overthrow the Constitution of the same country and institute sharia , a law that is opposite to the constitution of the country ? Is it that Nigeria has been destroyed and given out from the inside out ? We want peace in Nigeria and religious tolerance!

AFRICAMUSTBEFREE!!!!!!!

100,966 views • 3 months ago

THE CONVERSATION BEGINS HERE: What does the law provide about demonstrations? 1. Article 37 of the Constitution provides that every person has the right to PEACEBLY and UNARMED to assemble, to demonstrate, to picket, and to present petitions to public authorities. 2. The right to assemble demonstrate, picket and present petitions to public authorities is hence exercisable under Article 37 of the Constitution under two conditional precedents which must be met: PEACEBLY and UNARMED. Have the maandamano we have witnessed being done PEACEBLY and by UNARMED persons? 3. Suffice it to note that the right to assemble, demonstrate and to picket is not an absolute right. 4. Article 24 of the Constitution provides that the right to assemble, demonstrate and to picket is one of the rights that can be limited vide legislation to ensure that the enjoyment of rights and fundamental freedoms by any individuals does not prejudice the rights and freedoms of others. Have the maandamano not taken away the right to property of Kenyans with the mass destruction not only of private property but public property? 5. Article 259(1)(b) of the Constitution provides that the Constitution shall be interpreted in a manner that advances the rule of law, and the human rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of rights. To what extent do the maandamano fall within the defined parameters of the Constitution in particular the Bill of Rights? Is looting, destruction of property, anarchy and hooliganism the definition of demonstrations? Certainly not. These are purely criminal acts that have no constitutional basis! The conversation should begin here.

THE CONVERSATION BEGINS HERE: What does the law provide about demonstrations? 1. Article 37 of the Constitution provides that every person has the right to PEACEBLY and UNARMED to assemble, to demonstrate, to picket, and to present petitions to public authorities. 2. The right to assemble demonstrate, picket and present petitions to public authorities is hence exercisable under Article 37 of the Constitution under two conditional precedents which must be met: PEACEBLY and UNARMED. Have the maandamano we have witnessed being done PEACEBLY and by UNARMED persons? 3. Suffice it to note that the right to assemble, demonstrate and to picket is not an absolute right. 4. Article 24 of the Constitution provides that the right to assemble, demonstrate and to picket is one of the rights that can be limited vide legislation to ensure that the enjoyment of rights and fundamental freedoms by any individuals does not prejudice the rights and freedoms of others. Have the maandamano not taken away the right to property of Kenyans with the mass destruction not only of private property but public property? 5. Article 259(1)(b) of the Constitution provides that the Constitution shall be interpreted in a manner that advances the rule of law, and the human rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of rights. To what extent do the maandamano fall within the defined parameters of the Constitution in particular the Bill of Rights? Is looting, destruction of property, anarchy and hooliganism the definition of demonstrations? Certainly not. These are purely criminal acts that have no constitutional basis! The conversation should begin here.

Hon. Aden Duale, EGH

101,326 views • 3 years ago

Rep Chip Roy confirms on Fox News Muslims are working to intact Sharia Law “We're dealing with effectively a political movement, a political effort to Islamify Texas and the United States, to building a majority, to then implement Sharia law, and ultimately to convert people” “That's the goal and they're pretty open about it.” “The issue here is, is under our constitution, you can believe what you want to believe. It is a fundamental part of the First Amendment. But at the end of the day, when you've got something that is undermining our rule of law, undermining our constitution, we do not have to allow more people to come in who adhere to it, nor do we have to allow the creation of communities that are exclusionary and designed to implement Sharia law and so forth.” “Importantly, our Judeo-Christian heritage serves at the center of who we are as a country, and we have to remember that even as we protect the Constitution, the First Amendment, but we've got to remember to protect our culture at the same time.”

Rep Chip Roy confirms on Fox News Muslims are working to intact Sharia Law “We're dealing with effectively a political movement, a political effort to Islamify Texas and the United States, to building a majority, to then implement Sharia law, and ultimately to convert people” “That's the goal and they're pretty open about it.” “The issue here is, is under our constitution, you can believe what you want to believe. It is a fundamental part of the First Amendment. But at the end of the day, when you've got something that is undermining our rule of law, undermining our constitution, we do not have to allow more people to come in who adhere to it, nor do we have to allow the creation of communities that are exclusionary and designed to implement Sharia law and so forth.” “Importantly, our Judeo-Christian heritage serves at the center of who we are as a country, and we have to remember that even as we protect the Constitution, the First Amendment, but we've got to remember to protect our culture at the same time.”

Wall Street Apes

46,431 views • 8 months ago

Our Constitution guarantees due process and equal protection under the law to everyone in our country, not just citizens. We will not stand by and let the Trump Admin ignore the rule of law, our Supreme Court, and undermine the very foundations of our democracy. We’re ready to fight back with everything we’ve got.

Our Constitution guarantees due process and equal protection under the law to everyone in our country, not just citizens. We will not stand by and let the Trump Admin ignore the rule of law, our Supreme Court, and undermine the very foundations of our democracy. We’re ready to fight back with everything we’ve got.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

108,370 views • 1 year ago

Mr. President and Governor Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Babajide Sanwo-Olu , you swore to protect the constitution of this country. If you don't call your supporters in NURTW to order, don't be surprised if people uphold their constitutional right, which is the right to live and protect their lives. Agberos are not immortals, they are human and if they they do anything stupid, they will be met with resistance. Nobody has the right to threaten other people this way. The constitution guarantees the freedom of Association. It is a fundamental human right and anyone who goes against it goes against the constitution. Let the NURTW be warned, they don't have monopoly of madness!

Mr. President and Governor Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Babajide Sanwo-Olu , you swore to protect the constitution of this country. If you don't call your supporters in NURTW to order, don't be surprised if people uphold their constitutional right, which is the right to live and protect their lives. Agberos are not immortals, they are human and if they they do anything stupid, they will be met with resistance. Nobody has the right to threaten other people this way. The constitution guarantees the freedom of Association. It is a fundamental human right and anyone who goes against it goes against the constitution. Let the NURTW be warned, they don't have monopoly of madness!

Ayekooto

143,403 views • 10 months ago

#WATCH | Assam Elections 2026 | Guwahati: AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says, “…Freedom of religion is a fundamental right as per the Constitution. The preamble talks about Liberty of thought, equality and justice. The aim is to impose the Hindu Code Bill in the name of UCC, which is wrong and unconstitutional.”

#WATCH | Assam Elections 2026 | Guwahati: AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says, “…Freedom of religion is a fundamental right as per the Constitution. The preamble talks about Liberty of thought, equality and justice. The aim is to impose the Hindu Code Bill in the name of UCC, which is wrong and unconstitutional.”

ANI

16,036 views • 4 months ago

Here was my message to the graduating class of the UC College of Law, San Francisco: Our democracy is in peril. And you are the generation that must save it. As officers of the court, it will be up to you to defend the constitution and the uphold the rule of law. I believe you will do just that.

Here was my message to the graduating class of the UC College of Law, San Francisco: Our democracy is in peril. And you are the generation that must save it. As officers of the court, it will be up to you to defend the constitution and the uphold the rule of law. I believe you will do just that.

Adam Schiff

438,264 views • 3 years ago

#WATCH | PM Narendra Modi speaks on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) "Today people are being instigated in the name of UCC. How can the country run on two (laws)? The Constitution also talks of equal rights...Supreme Court has also asked to implement UCC. These (Opposition) people are playing vote bank politics," he says

#WATCH | PM Narendra Modi speaks on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) "Today people are being instigated in the name of UCC. How can the country run on two (laws)? The Constitution also talks of equal rights...Supreme Court has also asked to implement UCC. These (Opposition) people are playing vote bank politics," he says

ANI

1,262,829 views • 3 years ago

VIDEO | Kolkata: TMC MP Saugata Ray on proposed UCC Bill, says, "My reaction is to oppose this. Uniform Civil Code is part of the communal agenda of the BJP. At the time of Constitution making, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru had assured that uniform civil code will only be introduced when the Muslim society accepts it. So far only three states Gujarat, Uttarakhand and Assam have introduced uniform civil code. So, the West Bengal government is in a hurry to implement BJP's communal agenda. That is why we shall oppose it. We have also opposed laws like abolishing triple talaq in Parliament." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Kolkata: TMC MP Saugata Ray on proposed UCC Bill, says, "My reaction is to oppose this. Uniform Civil Code is part of the communal agenda of the BJP. At the time of Constitution making, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru had assured that uniform civil code will only be introduced when the Muslim society accepts it. So far only three states Gujarat, Uttarakhand and Assam have introduced uniform civil code. So, the West Bengal government is in a hurry to implement BJP's communal agenda. That is why we shall oppose it. We have also opposed laws like abolishing triple talaq in Parliament." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

29,860 views • 1 month ago

Contempt of Court is Not a Law in Ireland Under Article 15.2 of the Constitution of Ireland, the sole and exclusive power of making laws for the State is vested in the Oireachtas. This means that only Acts passed by the Dáil and Seanad, and signed by the President, can be considered “law” in Ireland. At present, “contempt of court” is enforced by judges through inherent jurisdiction and common law practice, not through an Act of the Oireachtas. There is no statute that has been enacted by the Oireachtas which defines contempt of court, sets out its elements, or prescribes penalties. Because contempt is based on judicial discretion and unwritten common law, it does not meet the constitutional standard of being a law made by the Oireachtas. Therefore, while courts may act as if it is enforceable, it is not, strictly speaking, an Irish law under Article 15.2 of the Constitution. #Constitution #Ireland #Oireachtas #RuleOfLaw #Justice #Accountability #Truth

Contempt of Court is Not a Law in Ireland Under Article 15.2 of the Constitution of Ireland, the sole and exclusive power of making laws for the State is vested in the Oireachtas. This means that only Acts passed by the Dáil and Seanad, and signed by the President, can be considered “law” in Ireland. At present, “contempt of court” is enforced by judges through inherent jurisdiction and common law practice, not through an Act of the Oireachtas. There is no statute that has been enacted by the Oireachtas which defines contempt of court, sets out its elements, or prescribes penalties. Because contempt is based on judicial discretion and unwritten common law, it does not meet the constitutional standard of being a law made by the Oireachtas. Therefore, while courts may act as if it is enforceable, it is not, strictly speaking, an Irish law under Article 15.2 of the Constitution. #Constitution #Ireland #Oireachtas #RuleOfLaw #Justice #Accountability #Truth

Patrick McGreal

14,710 views • 11 months ago

🇰🇿 President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev votes in the #NationalReferendum on the draft of a new #Constitution of the Republic of #Kazakhstan After voting, the President held a briefing for representatives of domestic and international media. Addressing journalists, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev highlighted the exceptional significance of the referendum for the country’s future. “I congratulate all of you, because today is truly a historic day for our country. The Constitution is a fundamental document that #guarantees the #rights and #freedoms of our citizens, which is why it holds special importance. The new Constitution reaffirms the territorial #integrity, #independence and #sovereignty of our state. The Constitution adopted in 1995 fulfilled its role. Our country lived under this document for 35 years, but time does not stand still. The moment has come to adopt a new Basic Law. I was also actively involved in its preparation, personally proposing the text of the Constitution’s preamble and a number of other provisions. I am confident that the new Basic Law will serve the interests of our country and its future”, – the President said.

🇰🇿 President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev votes in the #NationalReferendum on the draft of a new #Constitution of the Republic of #Kazakhstan After voting, the President held a briefing for representatives of domestic and international media. Addressing journalists, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev highlighted the exceptional significance of the referendum for the country’s future. “I congratulate all of you, because today is truly a historic day for our country. The Constitution is a fundamental document that #guarantees the #rights and #freedoms of our citizens, which is why it holds special importance. The new Constitution reaffirms the territorial #integrity, #independence and #sovereignty of our state. The Constitution adopted in 1995 fulfilled its role. Our country lived under this document for 35 years, but time does not stand still. The moment has come to adopt a new Basic Law. I was also actively involved in its preparation, personally proposing the text of the Constitution’s preamble and a number of other provisions. I am confident that the new Basic Law will serve the interests of our country and its future”, – the President said.

Press Office of the President of Kazakhstan

12,376 views • 5 months ago

THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE AGAINST HONOURABLE TUNDU A. LISSU IS THE LAW BEING DISREGARDED? The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) raises its voice regarding the troubling conduct in the criminal case against Honourable Tundu Antipas Lissu — a lawyer, former Member of Parliament, and one of the nation’s prominent advocates for human rights, good governance, and constitutionalism. Since his arrest, there has been a disturbing pattern undermining the principles of justice, violating legal procedures, and casting a heavy shadow over our criminal justice system. This is evident in the following: His arrest was conducted without adherence to lawful procedures, signaling an abuse of power; The charges appear to be politically motivated, raising serious concerns about the use of judicial processes as tools for political ends; Denial of even the basic right to greet and meet with fellow citizens before the official hearing of the case; Repeated adjournments of the case on legally unsubstantial grounds, indicating a deviation from legal focus; Interference with or denial of the accused’s right to private consultations with his lawyers, which violates the right to equal legal representation; Indications of breaches of the attorney-client privilege, which is protected under the Constitution and legal framework, and is a cornerstone of the right to an effective legal defense. The right of a client to consult privately with their lawyer is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, the Evidence Act, and the Code of Ethics for Advocates. To restrict or interfere with this right is to undermine the foundation of the justice process and impair the accused’s ability to defend themselves adequately before the court. TLS emphasizes the following: The law must not be used as a weapon against justice; State authorities must not place themselves above the Constitution or the laws enacted by Parliament; The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) must reflect deeply on the significant constitutional powers he holds in criminal justice and whether there is sufficient accountability to protect citizens' rights and ensure adherence to the law at all times; The right to legal assistance is not a privilege — it is a right of every citizen. Any criminal case, especially those involving individuals with political or social stature, must be conducted with transparency, fairness, and with respect for human dignity. The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) continues to closely monitor the progress of this case. We reiterate that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. We call upon the Judiciary and all state organs to uphold and protect the rights of the accused in accordance with the law and the Constitution. Furthermore, we urge all lawyers in the country, the media, and human rights stakeholders to continue championing the protection of justice, freedom of expression, and the rule of law — without fear or favour. BAK MWABUKUSI President, Tanganyika Law Society (TLS)

THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE AGAINST HONOURABLE TUNDU A. LISSU IS THE LAW BEING DISREGARDED? The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) raises its voice regarding the troubling conduct in the criminal case against Honourable Tundu Antipas Lissu — a lawyer, former Member of Parliament, and one of the nation’s prominent advocates for human rights, good governance, and constitutionalism. Since his arrest, there has been a disturbing pattern undermining the principles of justice, violating legal procedures, and casting a heavy shadow over our criminal justice system. This is evident in the following: His arrest was conducted without adherence to lawful procedures, signaling an abuse of power; The charges appear to be politically motivated, raising serious concerns about the use of judicial processes as tools for political ends; Denial of even the basic right to greet and meet with fellow citizens before the official hearing of the case; Repeated adjournments of the case on legally unsubstantial grounds, indicating a deviation from legal focus; Interference with or denial of the accused’s right to private consultations with his lawyers, which violates the right to equal legal representation; Indications of breaches of the attorney-client privilege, which is protected under the Constitution and legal framework, and is a cornerstone of the right to an effective legal defense. The right of a client to consult privately with their lawyer is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, the Evidence Act, and the Code of Ethics for Advocates. To restrict or interfere with this right is to undermine the foundation of the justice process and impair the accused’s ability to defend themselves adequately before the court. TLS emphasizes the following: The law must not be used as a weapon against justice; State authorities must not place themselves above the Constitution or the laws enacted by Parliament; The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) must reflect deeply on the significant constitutional powers he holds in criminal justice and whether there is sufficient accountability to protect citizens' rights and ensure adherence to the law at all times; The right to legal assistance is not a privilege — it is a right of every citizen. Any criminal case, especially those involving individuals with political or social stature, must be conducted with transparency, fairness, and with respect for human dignity. The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) continues to closely monitor the progress of this case. We reiterate that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. We call upon the Judiciary and all state organs to uphold and protect the rights of the accused in accordance with the law and the Constitution. Furthermore, we urge all lawyers in the country, the media, and human rights stakeholders to continue championing the protection of justice, freedom of expression, and the rule of law — without fear or favour. BAK MWABUKUSI President, Tanganyika Law Society (TLS)

Boniface Mwabukusi

15,205 views • 1 year ago

Gabbard: You have people in the positions of authority and power who in their arrogance really believe that they can break the law, they can undermine the rule of law… Don’t be surprised.. when bad actors accuse us of the very things they are guilty of in order to deflect away from how they and their actions are undermining the constitution, the rights and freedoms and civil liberties of the American people

Gabbard: You have people in the positions of authority and power who in their arrogance really believe that they can break the law, they can undermine the rule of law… Don’t be surprised.. when bad actors accuse us of the very things they are guilty of in order to deflect away from how they and their actions are undermining the constitution, the rights and freedoms and civil liberties of the American people

Acyn

506,264 views • 1 year ago

At DOJ Civil Rights Division, we protect people of faith and enforce the law. Many states already have protections in place, and U.S. Department of Justice is using the full force of federal civil rights law to defend the rights of all people of faith.

At DOJ Civil Rights Division, we protect people of faith and enforce the law. Many states already have protections in place, and U.S. Department of Justice is using the full force of federal civil rights law to defend the rights of all people of faith.

AAGHarmeetDhillon

37,425 views • 5 months ago

Muslims are Muslims first and part of the Islamic ummah, they will never respect the Law of the land in the west if it goes against the Sharia Law, and they are obligated to implement Sharia Law when they have the power to do so!

Muslims are Muslims first and part of the Islamic ummah, they will never respect the Law of the land in the west if it goes against the Sharia Law, and they are obligated to implement Sharia Law when they have the power to do so!

Bob

28,969 views • 1 year ago

Jazz's CEO has publicly come out in support of an unconstitutional bill. This is not merely a matter of the bill's wording or drafting, it is a question of fundamental human rights guaranteed under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Aamir Hafeez Ibrahim's demands should not be accommodated if they are inconsistent with the Constitution. No individual's or company's preferences can override constitutional protections. Issues such as fiberization and digitization are important and should certainly be addressed, but they must be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law, not by curtailing citizens' fundamental rights.

Jazz's CEO has publicly come out in support of an unconstitutional bill. This is not merely a matter of the bill's wording or drafting, it is a question of fundamental human rights guaranteed under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Aamir Hafeez Ibrahim's demands should not be accommodated if they are inconsistent with the Constitution. No individual's or company's preferences can override constitutional protections. Issues such as fiberization and digitization are important and should certainly be addressed, but they must be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law, not by curtailing citizens' fundamental rights.

Waqas Habib Rana

13,336 views • 1 month ago