正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

THE U.S. ALWAYS SUPPORTED APARTHEID US support for apartheid and settler-colonialism in South Africa goes as far back as its ‘constructive engagement’ policy that aimed to break South Africa's international isolation and use the apartheid regime as a proxy against socialist independence movements in Africa. Plus, African Stream’s Wambura...

22,712 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

African Stream 的头像
African Stream1 年前

Sources

Dr Shad Katuu 🌐 的头像
Dr Shad Katuu 🌐5 年前

Book Review: African Estate Records in Colonial Namibia - Ellen Ndeshi Namhila, ‘Little Research Value’: African Estate Records and Colonial Gaps in a Post-Colonial National Archive, vol 17, (Basel, Basler Afrika Bibliographien, 2017),

Landbro Kalrissian 的头像
Landbro Kalrissian1 年前

No it continues nothing cause no president was supported by Russia to cut off aid to any nation in Africa

Kumbana wa muRonga 的头像
Kumbana wa muRonga1 年前

Yt ppl looking for other yt ppl... Damn racists

Rosanne Miller 的头像
Rosanne Miller1 年前

Plus, African Stream’s Wambura Mwai (@wamburabrenda on IG) tells us that US corporations invested in upholding the apartheid regime with as much as $14.6 billion by the early 1980s, despite international boycotts, according to the US Out of Southern Africa Network.

Mazi Nwawelugo Emeka 的头像
Mazi Nwawelugo Emeka1 年前

South Africa is shit hole ! South Africa is a xenophobic shit hole !

𝕶𝖎𝕹𝕲👑(NBM)™️©️ 的头像
𝕶𝖎𝕹𝕲👑(NBM)™️©️1 年前

@Joe__Bassey I don't believe in such news.

Billy 的头像
Billy1 年前

great video thank you 🫶🏼

Landbro Kalrissian 的头像
Landbro Kalrissian1 年前

but if the true Afticans supported colonization rather then liberation . .if Africa had Pan Africanism do you think they would care to join

Landbro Kalrissian 的头像
Landbro Kalrissian1 年前

Trump is under Musk leaning heavy on that colony..History is about those with a plan ruling over those with none so why all this the White man wants and dont wany? WHAT DOES THE BLACK MAN IN AFRICA WANT 2025?

相关视频

During the apartheid era (1948–1994), the United States government maintained a complex and often contradictory relationship with the South African regime. Initially, U.S. foreign policy prioritized Cold War strategy over human rights, viewing apartheid South Africa as a reliable anti-communist ally in Africa. From the Truman to the Reagan administrations, American leaders emphasized "constructive engagement," favoring quiet diplomacy over economic sanctions. This approach allowed major U.S. corporations to continue operating in South Africa, providing vital economic support to the apartheid state. Despite growing domestic and international pressure, the U.S. resisted stringent sanctions until the 1980s. Grassroots movements, student activism, and congressional lobbying eventually led to the passage of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, which was signed into law despite President Ronald Reagan's veto. This legislation marked a significant shift in U.S. policy and imposed sweeping economic sanctions on South Africa, including bans on new investment and imports of certain goods. While the U.S. government had long avoided direct confrontation with the apartheid regime, the 1986 sanctions played a pivotal role in isolating it economically and politically. The international community increasingly condemned apartheid as a crime against humanity, and the U.S. ultimately aligned itself with this global consensus. The pressure contributed to the dismantling of apartheid and the peaceful transition to democracy in 1994.

LambChip

27,504 次观看 • 3 个月前