Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The U.S. and Iran signed the same document, read it completely differently, and now the Middle East is on fire again... Former JCPOA negotiator Robert Malley broke it all down for me: Paragraph five, on Hormuz administration, was the fault line. Iran read it as confirmation of their control...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,741,337 subscribers

379,716 просмотров • 4 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииОбразованиеНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Nobody in Washington wants to admit it, but this exact scenario was predictable from the jump... Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley explains: "If the U.S. strikes civilian infrastructure, they will strike civilian infrastructure. They can't strike American civilian infrastructure, so they'll strike that of their neighbors." We knew this is what Iran would do, but the U.S. walked straight into it anyway. How does that happen? Robert Malley
2:34

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Nobody in Washington wants to admit it, but this exact scenario was predictable from the jump... Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley explains: "If the U.S. strikes civilian infrastructure, they will strike civilian infrastructure. They can't strike American civilian infrastructure, so they'll strike that of their neighbors." We knew this is what Iran would do, but the U.S. walked straight into it anyway. How does that happen? Robert Malley

Mario Nawfal

145,263 просмотров • 4 дней назад

JUST IN 🇮🇷🇺🇸: U.S. and Iranian Negotiations hit a BIG WALL, The Strait of Hormuz Iran stressed the Strait of Hormuz, won't return to its pre-war status, and a new transit protocol must be established. The U.S. wants to return to what it was before the war. The 40-day War on Iran gave them a nuke, the Strait of Hormuz, and they will not give it up! This was a problem created by Netanyahu lying and starting this war on Iran and the world is paying the price. Thanks again Bibi...
3:28

JUST IN 🇮🇷🇺🇸: U.S. and Iranian Negotiations hit a BIG WALL, The Strait of Hormuz Iran stressed the Strait of Hormuz, won't return to its pre-war status, and a new transit protocol must be established. The U.S. wants to return to what it was before the war. The 40-day War on Iran gave them a nuke, the Strait of Hormuz, and they will not give it up! This was a problem created by Netanyahu lying and starting this war on Iran and the world is paying the price. Thanks again Bibi...

Ryan Rozbiani

147,375 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 U.S. signals that an Iran deal is close, but is it? The final details are allegedly being worked out. U.S. forces will remain in the region for 30 days to strike Iran if it violates the deal, while Iran gets oil sanctions waivers and billions in frozen funds. -> Iran denies the full toll-free opening of the Strait of Hormuz, as stated by the Trump Administration. Will there be a deal? Am I wrong in my assessment that U.S.-Iran tensions will remain in an Iran-like situation for a longer time?
2:06

🇺🇸🇮🇷 U.S. signals that an Iran deal is close, but is it? The final details are allegedly being worked out. U.S. forces will remain in the region for 30 days to strike Iran if it violates the deal, while Iran gets oil sanctions waivers and billions in frozen funds. -> Iran denies the full toll-free opening of the Strait of Hormuz, as stated by the Trump Administration. Will there be a deal? Am I wrong in my assessment that U.S.-Iran tensions will remain in an Iran-like situation for a longer time?

Lord Bebo

12,162 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

📽️ Rob Malley, former US special envoy for Iran, on the US war against Iran and the MOU that paused it: ➤ “There’s no outcome now that would justify the war retroactively… It was unconstitutional. It was unlawful, reckless, and damaging not just to Iran and the US, but to much of the globe.” ➤ “Wars have consequences. Wars that are lost have costlier ones. And the US is paying the cost of that decision.” ➤ Malley called the MOU “a vague, ambiguous deal that both sides read differently, signed for different reasons, are implementing in different ways” — surviving “despite the words on paper more than because of” them. ➤ “It really is a pursuit of their conflict through other means in different theaters: Lebanon, the Strait of Hormuz, and the question of economic relief.” (🎥 via Carnegie Connects hosted by Aaron David Miller, with Robert Malley)
2:47

📽️ Rob Malley, former US special envoy for Iran, on the US war against Iran and the MOU that paused it: ➤ “There’s no outcome now that would justify the war retroactively… It was unconstitutional. It was unlawful, reckless, and damaging not just to Iran and the US, but to much of the globe.” ➤ “Wars have consequences. Wars that are lost have costlier ones. And the US is paying the cost of that decision.” ➤ Malley called the MOU “a vague, ambiguous deal that both sides read differently, signed for different reasons, are implementing in different ways” — surviving “despite the words on paper more than because of” them. ➤ “It really is a pursuit of their conflict through other means in different theaters: Lebanon, the Strait of Hormuz, and the question of economic relief.” (🎥 via Carnegie Connects hosted by Aaron David Miller, with Robert Malley)

Drop Site

26,716 просмотров • 19 дней назад

🇮🇷 The Gulf states may soon face a choice between letting Iran skim profits off the Strait of Hormuz or watching it shut down entirely. Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley thinks Tehran's endgame is cutting a deal with the GCC that gives Iran a share of the proceeds, wrapped in the language of collective victimhood. "If the choice for them is either that or the closure of the strait, I just don't know what they'll pick." When your last card to play is calling Beijing, the old world order is already gone. Robert Malley
1:56

🇮🇷 The Gulf states may soon face a choice between letting Iran skim profits off the Strait of Hormuz or watching it shut down entirely. Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley thinks Tehran's endgame is cutting a deal with the GCC that gives Iran a share of the proceeds, wrapped in the language of collective victimhood. "If the choice for them is either that or the closure of the strait, I just don't know what they'll pick." When your last card to play is calling Beijing, the old world order is already gone. Robert Malley

Mario Nawfal

32,492 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Past June, the economic and political math turns hard against Washington, and Iran is counting on it. Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley says Iran knows that dragging this past June deepens the damage to both the U.S. economy and the Republican Party, and there is a camp in Tehran that believes surviving even another strike only proves their resilience again. He sketched four endings: a framework deal that reopens the strait, Trump declaring victory and walking away, another round of strikes to prove a point, or a grinding stalemate of no war and no peace that keeps claiming victims worldwide. On the strait itself, Robert says what he hears from the Iranians is that there is no return to the way things were. Some form of financial compensation is coming, whether through tolls, sanctions relief, or unfrozen assets. Robert Malley
6:19

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Past June, the economic and political math turns hard against Washington, and Iran is counting on it. Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley says Iran knows that dragging this past June deepens the damage to both the U.S. economy and the Republican Party, and there is a camp in Tehran that believes surviving even another strike only proves their resilience again. He sketched four endings: a framework deal that reopens the strait, Trump declaring victory and walking away, another round of strikes to prove a point, or a grinding stalemate of no war and no peace that keeps claiming victims worldwide. On the strait itself, Robert says what he hears from the Iranians is that there is no return to the way things were. Some form of financial compensation is coming, whether through tolls, sanctions relief, or unfrozen assets. Robert Malley

Mario Nawfal

34,367 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran didn't need to win the war. It just had to outlast the country that started it. Alan Eyre spent 40 years in U.S. diplomacy and was a core negotiator on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). His read on this moment is sharp, and not what most people expect: "Clausewitz said war is diplomacy by other means. Iran is saying diplomacy is war by other means." On the U.S. striking Iran every time Iran hits a ship: "It's flailing." He compares it to a chess endgame where the ending is already visible, the U.S. just hasn't accepted it. On America's broader trajectory: "This is 4% of the world controlling 25% of its resources. Well done. But yeah, it's done." His verdict on Lebanon: "doomed." I learned a lot from this conversation with Alan Eyre, and I think you will too.
48:01

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran didn't need to win the war. It just had to outlast the country that started it. Alan Eyre spent 40 years in U.S. diplomacy and was a core negotiator on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). His read on this moment is sharp, and not what most people expect: "Clausewitz said war is diplomacy by other means. Iran is saying diplomacy is war by other means." On the U.S. striking Iran every time Iran hits a ship: "It's flailing." He compares it to a chess endgame where the ending is already visible, the U.S. just hasn't accepted it. On America's broader trajectory: "This is 4% of the world controlling 25% of its resources. Well done. But yeah, it's done." His verdict on Lebanon: "doomed." I learned a lot from this conversation with Alan Eyre, and I think you will too.

Mario Nawfal

78,389 просмотров • 25 дней назад

‘It’s not clear Trump even READ the Memorandum of Understanding he signed with Iran.’ —Doug Bandow, former Special Assistant to President Reagan ‘The Iranians do have to be careful not to overreach. They hold the Strait. That gives them enormous leverage, but they need to be prepared to make a deal when they can. I think what they were worried about here was that it was pretty clear Trump was violating the MOU in terms of the Strait as well as the issue of Lebanon. Now, it's not clear that he actually read the MOU before he signed it. Did he actually know what was in it? It was somewhat ambiguous. You send over a couple of real estate developers, a childhood friend and your son-in-law and expect them to work out negotiations with Iran? What could possibly go wrong? The point is that I think he realised he was in trouble, he got a lot of flak for it and thought that he could force the Iranians to back down. They are holding firm. I think the danger here is they have to be prepared at some point, I think, to make a deal. And the question then is, how do you communicate that to Trump while indicating he's got to make the real concessions… but that they're willing to let him, in a sense, get away with some of his victory claims at home, as long as they get the substantive wins in the Middle East?’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
1:19

‘It’s not clear Trump even READ the Memorandum of Understanding he signed with Iran.’ —Doug Bandow, former Special Assistant to President Reagan ‘The Iranians do have to be careful not to overreach. They hold the Strait. That gives them enormous leverage, but they need to be prepared to make a deal when they can. I think what they were worried about here was that it was pretty clear Trump was violating the MOU in terms of the Strait as well as the issue of Lebanon. Now, it's not clear that he actually read the MOU before he signed it. Did he actually know what was in it? It was somewhat ambiguous. You send over a couple of real estate developers, a childhood friend and your son-in-law and expect them to work out negotiations with Iran? What could possibly go wrong? The point is that I think he realised he was in trouble, he got a lot of flak for it and thought that he could force the Iranians to back down. They are holding firm. I think the danger here is they have to be prepared at some point, I think, to make a deal. And the question then is, how do you communicate that to Trump while indicating he's got to make the real concessions… but that they're willing to let him, in a sense, get away with some of his victory claims at home, as long as they get the substantive wins in the Middle East?’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

19,000 просмотров • 3 дней назад

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:
3:45

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

ANI

48,501 просмотров • 6 дней назад

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump's team has given Iran until TOMORROW to publicly renounce attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz, and to state that the Strait is OPEN for travel There will be CONSEQUENCES if not, per Axios 🔥 Trump is playing hardball: He said the ceasefire is OVER, now Iran knows he's not just going to sit back and watch them violate EVERY commitment they make FOX: "The U.S. is now demanding that Iran make a public statement declaring the Strait of Hormuz is open and that ships crossing will no longer be attacked." "The U.S. hit roughly 170 targets in Iran this week, including rail bridges the U.S. says were used to transport weapons."
2:27

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump's team has given Iran until TOMORROW to publicly renounce attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz, and to state that the Strait is OPEN for travel There will be CONSEQUENCES if not, per Axios 🔥 Trump is playing hardball: He said the ceasefire is OVER, now Iran knows he's not just going to sit back and watch them violate EVERY commitment they make FOX: "The U.S. is now demanding that Iran make a public statement declaring the Strait of Hormuz is open and that ships crossing will no longer be attacked." "The U.S. hit roughly 170 targets in Iran this week, including rail bridges the U.S. says were used to transport weapons."

Eric Daugherty

530,255 просмотров • 13 дней назад

🚨 NOW: Iran is growing panicked that President Trump has EASILY out-maneuvered them and seized control of the Strait of Hormuz And they can't to ANYTHING about it! "The Iranians tried to put pressure on the United States and the military in the region and their plan BACKFIRED." "And ultimately that led to President Trump controlling the Strait of Hormuz. And that is what we are seeing right now." "Iranian ports are totally stopped at this moment. They cannot move vessels out through the Strait of Hormuz due to the U.S. Navy blockade. And the President now is issuing this new warning to the Iranian regime if they try to escalate in the Persian Gulf." Trey Yingst
1:26

🚨 NOW: Iran is growing panicked that President Trump has EASILY out-maneuvered them and seized control of the Strait of Hormuz And they can't to ANYTHING about it! "The Iranians tried to put pressure on the United States and the military in the region and their plan BACKFIRED." "And ultimately that led to President Trump controlling the Strait of Hormuz. And that is what we are seeing right now." "Iranian ports are totally stopped at this moment. They cannot move vessels out through the Strait of Hormuz due to the U.S. Navy blockade. And the President now is issuing this new warning to the Iranian regime if they try to escalate in the Persian Gulf." Trey Yingst

Eric Daugherty

103,366 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

JUST IN⚡️- The U.S. has announced the deployment of the USS Ford aircraft carrier strike group to Europe. This means that three U.S. aircraft carriers along with one British carrier will be positioned near Israel and Iran. The concentration of allied firepower in the region will be significant. It is clear that Trump has given the green light for a war against Iran. The US also believes that Iran might have the capability to hit an aircraft carrier with a missile, and it is taking steps to prepare for such a scenario.
2:26

JUST IN⚡️- The U.S. has announced the deployment of the USS Ford aircraft carrier strike group to Europe. This means that three U.S. aircraft carriers along with one British carrier will be positioned near Israel and Iran. The concentration of allied firepower in the region will be significant. It is clear that Trump has given the green light for a war against Iran. The US also believes that Iran might have the capability to hit an aircraft carrier with a missile, and it is taking steps to prepare for such a scenario.

WORLD AT WAR

2,438,249 просмотров • 1 год назад

One of the most astonishing attempts at projecting grandiose delusions I’ve ever seen—“so [Obama] tried to bribe them to make a deal… 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing…” Trump bribed Iran with $324 billion. And got nothing for it. “And the main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. They fully agreed to that with strong policing powers, and they won't have nuclear weapons, which is what I was all about, because they probably would have used it if they had it. So we had two big moments when they terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barrack Hussein Obama deal, and when I terminated that, it was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran. It was a deal where 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing 7, well, not a 7, 7, 57, I guess, right? But it was put on a big, beautiful Boeing 757. They needed a Boeing 747 to be honest with you, because it was a lot of cash. 1.7 billion was taken out of the banks and given to Iran, and on top of that, tens of billions of dollars was made. So they tried to bribe them to make a deal that didn't work. It never works. And that we lived on a great job, and hopefully it's going to be a good relationship, and we're going to get along. And if we don't, we go back to where we started, but I don't know if it's going to be necessary. The Iran deal that we made is going to bring a lot of success to the world, because the oil was really plugged up there for a while. They would call me on occasion, "See, come on, please. Let's go." The oil prices. But the oil is coming way down.”
1:39

One of the most astonishing attempts at projecting grandiose delusions I’ve ever seen—“so [Obama] tried to bribe them to make a deal… 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing…” Trump bribed Iran with $324 billion. And got nothing for it. “And the main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. They fully agreed to that with strong policing powers, and they won't have nuclear weapons, which is what I was all about, because they probably would have used it if they had it. So we had two big moments when they terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barrack Hussein Obama deal, and when I terminated that, it was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran. It was a deal where 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing 7, well, not a 7, 7, 57, I guess, right? But it was put on a big, beautiful Boeing 757. They needed a Boeing 747 to be honest with you, because it was a lot of cash. 1.7 billion was taken out of the banks and given to Iran, and on top of that, tens of billions of dollars was made. So they tried to bribe them to make a deal that didn't work. It never works. And that we lived on a great job, and hopefully it's going to be a good relationship, and we're going to get along. And if we don't, we go back to where we started, but I don't know if it's going to be necessary. The Iran deal that we made is going to bring a lot of success to the world, because the oil was really plugged up there for a while. They would call me on occasion, "See, come on, please. Let's go." The oil prices. But the oil is coming way down.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

31,475 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jake Sullivan on Trump's Iran deal: Trump called the JCPOA the worst deal in human history. Just quite a striking statement. The worst deal in human history. And here he does a deal that gives Iran tens of billions of dollars to open a strait that wasn't closed before he launched the war. Expressly permits them to design a scheme going forward to charge fees for ships going through that strait, which was never a thing before this war. That promises $300 billion in investment in Iran to reconstruct it. And that doesn't actually get anything solid on the nuclear file.
0:52

Jake Sullivan on Trump's Iran deal: Trump called the JCPOA the worst deal in human history. Just quite a striking statement. The worst deal in human history. And here he does a deal that gives Iran tens of billions of dollars to open a strait that wasn't closed before he launched the war. Expressly permits them to design a scheme going forward to charge fees for ships going through that strait, which was never a thing before this war. That promises $300 billion in investment in Iran to reconstruct it. And that doesn't actually get anything solid on the nuclear file.

Clash Report

21,372 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 Secretary Marco Rubio just delivered a BRUTAL wake-up call to U.S. allies refusing to step up on the Strait of Hormuz. “We depend very little on the straits — this is a problem for the WORLD.” RUBIO: “Well, the Straits of Hormuz, those are international waters, so anything Iran does to impede commercial traffic is illegal.” “For all these countries that like to talk about international law, it is a violation of international maritime law to impede the free flow of travel in international waters, so that’s number one.” “Number two, it’s illegal to bomb and hit and attack commercial shipping, and sink them.” “That’s what the Nazis did during World War II in the Atlantic, and that’s what they are doing now to ships from countries they don’t like, flagged by countries they don’t like.” “These are TERRORISTIC acts that they are undertaking.” “So the United States gets very little energy through the Strait of Hormuz.” “Our allies ship out a lot of oil through there...and certainly countries in Asia and Europe on it.” “We depend very little on the straits, if, in fact, Iran decides to set up a toll, if, in fact, Iran decides that they are going to illegally control the Straits of Hormuz...” “I imagine that will be the president’s call whether he wants to help but this is a problem for the world.” “It’s countries around the world that should be stepping up and dealing with that and saying that’s intolerable and that’s what we’ve encouraged them to do.” Rubio just exposed the truth — Iran is committing terroristic acts in international waters and America’s allies are sitting on their hands.
1:02

🚨 Secretary Marco Rubio just delivered a BRUTAL wake-up call to U.S. allies refusing to step up on the Strait of Hormuz. “We depend very little on the straits — this is a problem for the WORLD.” RUBIO: “Well, the Straits of Hormuz, those are international waters, so anything Iran does to impede commercial traffic is illegal.” “For all these countries that like to talk about international law, it is a violation of international maritime law to impede the free flow of travel in international waters, so that’s number one.” “Number two, it’s illegal to bomb and hit and attack commercial shipping, and sink them.” “That’s what the Nazis did during World War II in the Atlantic, and that’s what they are doing now to ships from countries they don’t like, flagged by countries they don’t like.” “These are TERRORISTIC acts that they are undertaking.” “So the United States gets very little energy through the Strait of Hormuz.” “Our allies ship out a lot of oil through there...and certainly countries in Asia and Europe on it.” “We depend very little on the straits, if, in fact, Iran decides to set up a toll, if, in fact, Iran decides that they are going to illegally control the Straits of Hormuz...” “I imagine that will be the president’s call whether he wants to help but this is a problem for the world.” “It’s countries around the world that should be stepping up and dealing with that and saying that’s intolerable and that’s what we’ve encouraged them to do.” Rubio just exposed the truth — Iran is committing terroristic acts in international waters and America’s allies are sitting on their hands.

Overton

33,471 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 IRAN JUST RESPONDED TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S DEAL Iran apparently wants to “end the war” and ensure safety in the Strait HOLD THEM TO IT! “Reports indicate that Iran has responded to the U.S. peace proposal to end the war, giving their response to Pakistani mediators.” “Now, initial reports in Iranian state media indicate their response focuses on ending the war and ensuring security in the Strait of Hormuz. There is no mention of Iran's nuclear program, a key agenda item for the Trump administration.” “This comes as we're also tracking reports of a cargo ship that was targeted off the coast of Qatar earlier this week.” Trey Yingst
0:28

🚨 IRAN JUST RESPONDED TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S DEAL Iran apparently wants to “end the war” and ensure safety in the Strait HOLD THEM TO IT! “Reports indicate that Iran has responded to the U.S. peace proposal to end the war, giving their response to Pakistani mediators.” “Now, initial reports in Iranian state media indicate their response focuses on ending the war and ensuring security in the Strait of Hormuz. There is no mention of Iran's nuclear program, a key agenda item for the Trump administration.” “This comes as we're also tracking reports of a cargo ship that was targeted off the coast of Qatar earlier this week.” Trey Yingst

Eric Daugherty

380,073 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MOMENTS AGO: Trump is getting ready for Plan B if the peace talks with Iran in Pakistan FAIL. He also gives Iran a dire WARNING if Iran is slowing down traffic and charging fees from the Strait of Hormuz. Trump's mindset if Iran doesn't cooperate...AGAIN: Strike hard. No mercy. "This is not a complete deal. We know that JD Vance, our Vice President, is on his way to Islamabad, Pakistan, to meet with those who will sit at the table and make a deal happen, potentially. But President Trump is issuing that stern warning to the regime at this point. Here's also what he has put up on Truth Social. In part, 'There are reports that Iran is charging fees to tankers going through the Hormuz Strait. They better not be, and if they are, they better stop now!"
1:49

MOMENTS AGO: Trump is getting ready for Plan B if the peace talks with Iran in Pakistan FAIL. He also gives Iran a dire WARNING if Iran is slowing down traffic and charging fees from the Strait of Hormuz. Trump's mindset if Iran doesn't cooperate...AGAIN: Strike hard. No mercy. "This is not a complete deal. We know that JD Vance, our Vice President, is on his way to Islamabad, Pakistan, to meet with those who will sit at the table and make a deal happen, potentially. But President Trump is issuing that stern warning to the regime at this point. Here's also what he has put up on Truth Social. In part, 'There are reports that Iran is charging fees to tankers going through the Hormuz Strait. They better not be, and if they are, they better stop now!"

DeVory Darkins

238,984 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

President Trump warned "all hell will rain down" on Iran if the country decides to pursue nuclear weapons as both countries agreed to an initial deal to end the war. "The only thing that really matters to me is Iran will never have a nuclear weapon," Trump said on Tuesday at the G7 summit in France. The deal is expected to extend the U.S.-Iran ceasefire, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, end a U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports and launch negotiations on Iran's nuclear program.
1:16

President Trump warned "all hell will rain down" on Iran if the country decides to pursue nuclear weapons as both countries agreed to an initial deal to end the war. "The only thing that really matters to me is Iran will never have a nuclear weapon," Trump said on Tuesday at the G7 summit in France. The deal is expected to extend the U.S.-Iran ceasefire, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, end a U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports and launch negotiations on Iran's nuclear program.

CBS News

41,468 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Tucker Carlson on Iran: “The Iraq war was a catastrophe, and Trump was the first major political figure willing to say so. He’s always known it. So the question is: why would he even contemplate another war, this time with Iran? One answer is that Washington may not fully control whether such a war begins. Israel, under Benjamin Netanyahu, could decide to strike Iran on its own, without coordination. If that happened, Iran would almost certainly retaliate against Israel, and could also hit U.S. assets and energy infrastructure in the Gulf. At that point, America would be pulled in automatically. From that perspective, the U.S. may not be seeking a war with Iran at all, but instead trying to restrain the actions of its closest ally and prevent a wider conflict.”
1:16

Tucker Carlson on Iran: “The Iraq war was a catastrophe, and Trump was the first major political figure willing to say so. He’s always known it. So the question is: why would he even contemplate another war, this time with Iran? One answer is that Washington may not fully control whether such a war begins. Israel, under Benjamin Netanyahu, could decide to strike Iran on its own, without coordination. If that happened, Iran would almost certainly retaliate against Israel, and could also hit U.S. assets and energy infrastructure in the Gulf. At that point, America would be pulled in automatically. From that perspective, the U.S. may not be seeking a war with Iran at all, but instead trying to restrain the actions of its closest ally and prevent a wider conflict.”

Open Source Intel

58,984 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert: ‘With the US-Iran agreement, we are back to SQUARE ONE.’ ‘What I can say about Netanyahu is that the greatest failure in influencing Trump started much earlier. Not in 2026 when he possibly convinced Trump to jointly attack Iran, but when he convinced Trump in 2018 to withdraw from the then-signed agreement between President Obama and the Iranians about the nuclear program of Iran. Because what happened is that until then, Iran didn’t enrich uranium since they signed the agreement with Obama. And when America withdrew from that agreement, they started rapidly to enrich uranium up to the level of 60%, which brought them quite close to the possibility of building an atomic bomb. And that has, in a way, created the almost inevitable circumstances to launch this military attack on February of 26th. And the bottom line after this four month process is that we came back to where it started. There is an agreement between America and Iran, after a long period of closing the Strait of Hormuz, which caused serious economic damage to the international community. And we are with an agreement perhaps weaker than the one that was signed by President Obama. I don’t remember that President Obama promised to build up a fund of $300 billion to compensate Iran for the losses of the war, and I don’t know what is the difference in terms of inspecting and supervising the nuclear program other than what was until then. The Obama agreement was also based on the supervision and inspection of the nuclear program by the IAEA, the International Atomic Agency in Vienna. And that’s more or less what they agreed. Now, there is nothing about the ballistic missiles. There is nothing about, of course, the change of regime in Iran. So, actually we are back into square one.’ —Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert joins us for Saturday’s episode of Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel👇
3:03

Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert: ‘With the US-Iran agreement, we are back to SQUARE ONE.’ ‘What I can say about Netanyahu is that the greatest failure in influencing Trump started much earlier. Not in 2026 when he possibly convinced Trump to jointly attack Iran, but when he convinced Trump in 2018 to withdraw from the then-signed agreement between President Obama and the Iranians about the nuclear program of Iran. Because what happened is that until then, Iran didn’t enrich uranium since they signed the agreement with Obama. And when America withdrew from that agreement, they started rapidly to enrich uranium up to the level of 60%, which brought them quite close to the possibility of building an atomic bomb. And that has, in a way, created the almost inevitable circumstances to launch this military attack on February of 26th. And the bottom line after this four month process is that we came back to where it started. There is an agreement between America and Iran, after a long period of closing the Strait of Hormuz, which caused serious economic damage to the international community. And we are with an agreement perhaps weaker than the one that was signed by President Obama. I don’t remember that President Obama promised to build up a fund of $300 billion to compensate Iran for the losses of the war, and I don’t know what is the difference in terms of inspecting and supervising the nuclear program other than what was until then. The Obama agreement was also based on the supervision and inspection of the nuclear program by the IAEA, the International Atomic Agency in Vienna. And that’s more or less what they agreed. Now, there is nothing about the ballistic missiles. There is nothing about, of course, the change of regime in Iran. So, actually we are back into square one.’ —Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert joins us for Saturday’s episode of Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel👇

Going Underground

39,275 просмотров • 1 месяц назад