正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The U.S. Government Doesn't Run Elections

59,507 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

J00_Pac 的头像
J00_Pac1 年前

Welcome to Federalism, Mr. Beat. It was only one of the foundations our country was built on. TX is different than CA, GA is different from AL, FL is different from HI, KS is different than OH, WI is different from IL. Showing ID is not voter suppression. 😅

The Washington Post 的头像
The Washington Post1 年前

A rundown of Donald Trump’s biggest campaign promises and whether he has or hasn’t delivered.

Desert._.Druid 的头像
Desert._.Druid1 年前

Sooooo making it a popular vote would also be uncon????

JohnDoe1 的头像
JohnDoe11 年前

"I like how the US runs it's elections but also dang states that have laws I don't like"- mr beat awful takes

Ian J. Winiarski 的头像
Ian J. Winiarski1 年前

Sore loser laws are unconstitutional

right is right 的头像
right is right1 年前

Allowing someone to vote without an ID is absolutely ridiculous. The DNC required ID just to enter their own convention. Let's drop IDs for everything and see how it goes...

Malafunkshun808 的头像
Malafunkshun8081 年前

Mhmm, that’s right, Beat! It’s a reflection of America’s heritage of localism and individualism that dates back to the foundations of America. This is also one of the more difficult aspects of America to understand from outside America. Aloha 🇺🇸🤙🏼

Sheng Chi 🔄 的头像
Sheng Chi 🔄1 年前

You’ve been coping ever since you’re candidate were cooked by the American people🇺🇸

TheTechBoy Media ✝️ 🇺🇸🇮🇱🌲(wink) 的头像
TheTechBoy Media ✝️ 🇺🇸🇮🇱🌲(wink)1 年前

Oh no not voter IDs

AlexForGovernor 的头像
AlexForGovernor1 年前

Voter ID just seems like no harm no foul. People need to ID themselves almost every day whether they’re doing their taxes or buying alcohol.

Tam 🇬🇧🇷🇺💪🏼 的头像
Tam 🇬🇧🇷🇺💪🏼1 年前

The system we have here in Scotland is alright, you lot should try it. We have proportional representation, where the country is split in to regional and local constituencies. Most MSPs are elected to local positions (73), while the rest (56) are elected to regional positions. Regional MSPs are typically opposition MSPs that didn’t win in local constituencies, that still get to have a seat so that the will of the people who lost is still heard. Imagine an election is 50.1%-49.9%. Should the voice of the 49.9% not be heard? This is a simplification and I prolly got some stuff wrong (been a while since I’ve talked about Scottish elections) so feel free to correct and expand if you do so feel fit.

相关视频