Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The U.S. government may have run a secret physics program disguised as academic research. Eric Weinstein traces a web of connections that most people have never heard of. Two apparent intelligence cutouts (Agnew Bainson and Roger Babson) were each fitted with cover stories about anti-gravity research. They funneled world... class physicists into obscure institutions: Bryce DeWitt at UNC's Institute of Field Physics. Louis Witten at something called RIAS, a Bell Labs-level operation hidden inside Glenn L. Martin (the company that became Lockheed Martin). The roster inside RIAS alone is staggering. Sheldon Glashow. Rudolf Kömmel. Solomon Lefschetz came out of retirement for this. Freeman Dyson. Arnowitt. This wasn't fringe science. This was the deepest bench in theoretical physics, all working under an aerospace defense contractor. Then around 1970, the trail goes cold. Who pulled the plug and why? What did they find? And where did all that firepower go?show more

American Alchemy

27,987 subscribers

49,773 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING: Two of the most technically qualified scientists to ever engage with the UFO mystery sat down together for the first time: Dr. Eric Davis, astrophysics PhD who formally investigated the crash retrieval program through classified government channels and Dr. Eric Weinstein (), Harvard math PhD and founder of physics theory, Geometric Unity. Davis confirms that he personally interviewed 5 direct crash retrieval program employees at two legacy aerospace companies (one being TRW, acquired by Northrop) and that the United States holds between 10 and 40 UFOs in its direct possession. He also describes discussing UFOs with George H.W. Bush directly and Jimmy Carter getting briefed on the subject. Finally, Davis says the program only consists of Aerospace engineers. Weinstein's response: if these craft of non-human origin defy the laws of physics, you need top theoretical physicists on the program. Weinstein says either the people running it are criminally incompetent or there are no craft. Sparks flew.🚨 This is the conversation I have been trying to make happen for years. Eric Davis is one of the most credentialed investigator of the UFO crash retrieval program alive with an eidetic memory. Astrophysics PhD from the University of Arizona, 30 years in the field, security clearances through AAWSAP, formally deputized by the DIA under program manager James Lacatski (who himself claims he has stepped inside a UFO and breached the hull). Eric Weinstein is one of the most technically gifted minds outside the classified world, someone Davis himself identified as one of only three people technical and heterodox enough to engage with this material. I put them in a room and let them go at it. This conversation was nothing short of historic. Bombshell Details: Davis Says Roswell Was Real and He Confirmed It Officially: Davis traces his investigation to 1996 at Robert Bigelow's NIDS. Astronaut Ed Mitchell told him Admiral Thomas Wilson, then J2 on the Joint Chiefs, independently verified the 1947 Corona crash was a real non-human craft. Davis later used his DIA credentials through AAWSAP to reach the programmatic level of the operation. His conviction: 100%. Weinstein says he has talked to too many credible people to dismiss it, but has never seen one piece of incontrovertible proof. Davis Interviewed Program Workers. None Were Physicists: Davis met five people from one legacy aerospace company on the program. A material scientist who spent two decades on it. A TRW source who ran the SCIF at Wright-Patterson with access to intact craft in a secured hangar. Not one of Grusch's 40 firsthand witnesses is a theoretical physicist. Davis confirms none of his contacts were either. Weinstein compares this to performing Beethoven's Fifth with accountants and boxers. Eight Decades of Reverse Engineering. Zero Results: Davis's senior VP source confirmed no functional progress after eight decades. They could see how craft were constructed at the nanoscale. Could not reproduce any of it. Davis asked: where are your physicists? Answer: we never had any. Weinstein calls this a two-line proof. If it defies the laws of physics and you have no physicists, you are either the dumbest operation in history or there is nothing to reverse engineer. Weinstein Tells Davis His Physics Won't Work: Davis has published on warp drives and traversable wormholes within general relativity. Weinstein tells him directly: none of it will work. Davis accepts this. Weinstein says if craft break known physics, the answer is not squeezing exotic scenarios out of Einstein. The answer is Einstein is incomplete. Davis agrees. The debate becomes a collaboration. The Golden Age of Gravity Research Vanished in the 1970s: Weinstein identifies a 1971 Australian intelligence document naming physicists like Arnowitt, Desser, Dyson, and Oppenheimer in what reads like a Manhattan Project for Gravity and exotic propulsion. Two apparent cutouts funded work through Bryce DeWitt at UNC and Lewis Witten at a facility called RIAS inside the Martin Company. Sheldon Glashow and Solomon Lefschitz worked there. Then the trail goes cold. Davis noticed the same disappearance in graduate school. No one had an answer. String Theory as a Weapon Against Frontier Physics: After a Princeton junior designed a working atomic weapon from public sources, theoretical physics became too dangerous to leave in the open. String theory consumed the field. 42 years, zero experimental predictions. The Biden White House told Andreessen and Horowitz directly that entire areas of physics were classified in the nuclear era. Davis says he always thought string theory's dominance and the absence of physicists on the crash retrieval program were connected. Weinstein agrees. Weinstein Finds Gravity Hidden in the Strong Nuclear Force: Lazar's "gravity wave A" claim sounds like garbage. Weinstein treats it as garbled proximity information. He identifies a formal possibility: the theta term from QCD, based on the Pontriagin class, transgresses to a Chern-Simons functional: the closest known Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert, which governs gravity. Davis calls it remarkable. Weinstein believes this is the first time the connection has been stated publicly. Renaissance Technologies as the Possible Physics Brain Trust: If a secret physics program exists, track where frontier physicists cluster. Renaissance Technologies hires differential geometers and topologists. Sits next to Brookhaven National Lab. Draws from SUNY Stony Brook, where C.N. Yang was based. Returns resemble state-sponsored performance. Weinstein told Jim Simons before his death that Chern-Simons theory is the closest Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert. Simons invited him to Stony Brook for a year, then asked where he would find the funding. He was worth over $20 billion. The Wilson-Davis Notes Are Confirmed Authentic: Davis confirms the typewritten notes are real, legitimate, and 100% accurate. They describe former J2 Admiral Wilson being denied access to a crash retrieval program inside a private aerospace company funded from his own DIA budget. He was told he lacked need-to-know and met with Davis out of frustration. Davis wants blanket immunity to say everything about this meeting but confirms the notes are real. Why This Matters: These two arrive from opposite directions and land on the same problem. Davis has total certainty non-human craft exist in American possession. Weinstein cannot construct a single theory that explains the full landscape of claims and missing evidence. Both say the absence of theoretical physicists is indefensible. Davis wants access to the hardware. Weinstein wants the right minds inserted. The question Davis asks: let us in. The question Weinstein asks is sharper: if you will not let physicists in, what exactly are you protecting? Full conversation covers all of this and much more. Special thanks to Missileman for co-hosting! One of the most important episodes we have ever done live now 👇

🚨 BREAKING: Two of the most technically qualified scientists to ever engage with the UFO mystery sat down together for the first time: Dr. Eric Davis, astrophysics PhD who formally investigated the crash retrieval program through classified government channels and Dr. Eric Weinstein (), Harvard math PhD and founder of physics theory, Geometric Unity. Davis confirms that he personally interviewed 5 direct crash retrieval program employees at two legacy aerospace companies (one being TRW, acquired by Northrop) and that the United States holds between 10 and 40 UFOs in its direct possession. He also describes discussing UFOs with George H.W. Bush directly and Jimmy Carter getting briefed on the subject. Finally, Davis says the program only consists of Aerospace engineers. Weinstein's response: if these craft of non-human origin defy the laws of physics, you need top theoretical physicists on the program. Weinstein says either the people running it are criminally incompetent or there are no craft. Sparks flew.🚨 This is the conversation I have been trying to make happen for years. Eric Davis is one of the most credentialed investigator of the UFO crash retrieval program alive with an eidetic memory. Astrophysics PhD from the University of Arizona, 30 years in the field, security clearances through AAWSAP, formally deputized by the DIA under program manager James Lacatski (who himself claims he has stepped inside a UFO and breached the hull). Eric Weinstein is one of the most technically gifted minds outside the classified world, someone Davis himself identified as one of only three people technical and heterodox enough to engage with this material. I put them in a room and let them go at it. This conversation was nothing short of historic. Bombshell Details: Davis Says Roswell Was Real and He Confirmed It Officially: Davis traces his investigation to 1996 at Robert Bigelow's NIDS. Astronaut Ed Mitchell told him Admiral Thomas Wilson, then J2 on the Joint Chiefs, independently verified the 1947 Corona crash was a real non-human craft. Davis later used his DIA credentials through AAWSAP to reach the programmatic level of the operation. His conviction: 100%. Weinstein says he has talked to too many credible people to dismiss it, but has never seen one piece of incontrovertible proof. Davis Interviewed Program Workers. None Were Physicists: Davis met five people from one legacy aerospace company on the program. A material scientist who spent two decades on it. A TRW source who ran the SCIF at Wright-Patterson with access to intact craft in a secured hangar. Not one of Grusch's 40 firsthand witnesses is a theoretical physicist. Davis confirms none of his contacts were either. Weinstein compares this to performing Beethoven's Fifth with accountants and boxers. Eight Decades of Reverse Engineering. Zero Results: Davis's senior VP source confirmed no functional progress after eight decades. They could see how craft were constructed at the nanoscale. Could not reproduce any of it. Davis asked: where are your physicists? Answer: we never had any. Weinstein calls this a two-line proof. If it defies the laws of physics and you have no physicists, you are either the dumbest operation in history or there is nothing to reverse engineer. Weinstein Tells Davis His Physics Won't Work: Davis has published on warp drives and traversable wormholes within general relativity. Weinstein tells him directly: none of it will work. Davis accepts this. Weinstein says if craft break known physics, the answer is not squeezing exotic scenarios out of Einstein. The answer is Einstein is incomplete. Davis agrees. The debate becomes a collaboration. The Golden Age of Gravity Research Vanished in the 1970s: Weinstein identifies a 1971 Australian intelligence document naming physicists like Arnowitt, Desser, Dyson, and Oppenheimer in what reads like a Manhattan Project for Gravity and exotic propulsion. Two apparent cutouts funded work through Bryce DeWitt at UNC and Lewis Witten at a facility called RIAS inside the Martin Company. Sheldon Glashow and Solomon Lefschitz worked there. Then the trail goes cold. Davis noticed the same disappearance in graduate school. No one had an answer. String Theory as a Weapon Against Frontier Physics: After a Princeton junior designed a working atomic weapon from public sources, theoretical physics became too dangerous to leave in the open. String theory consumed the field. 42 years, zero experimental predictions. The Biden White House told Andreessen and Horowitz directly that entire areas of physics were classified in the nuclear era. Davis says he always thought string theory's dominance and the absence of physicists on the crash retrieval program were connected. Weinstein agrees. Weinstein Finds Gravity Hidden in the Strong Nuclear Force: Lazar's "gravity wave A" claim sounds like garbage. Weinstein treats it as garbled proximity information. He identifies a formal possibility: the theta term from QCD, based on the Pontriagin class, transgresses to a Chern-Simons functional: the closest known Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert, which governs gravity. Davis calls it remarkable. Weinstein believes this is the first time the connection has been stated publicly. Renaissance Technologies as the Possible Physics Brain Trust: If a secret physics program exists, track where frontier physicists cluster. Renaissance Technologies hires differential geometers and topologists. Sits next to Brookhaven National Lab. Draws from SUNY Stony Brook, where C.N. Yang was based. Returns resemble state-sponsored performance. Weinstein told Jim Simons before his death that Chern-Simons theory is the closest Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert. Simons invited him to Stony Brook for a year, then asked where he would find the funding. He was worth over $20 billion. The Wilson-Davis Notes Are Confirmed Authentic: Davis confirms the typewritten notes are real, legitimate, and 100% accurate. They describe former J2 Admiral Wilson being denied access to a crash retrieval program inside a private aerospace company funded from his own DIA budget. He was told he lacked need-to-know and met with Davis out of frustration. Davis wants blanket immunity to say everything about this meeting but confirms the notes are real. Why This Matters: These two arrive from opposite directions and land on the same problem. Davis has total certainty non-human craft exist in American possession. Weinstein cannot construct a single theory that explains the full landscape of claims and missing evidence. Both say the absence of theoretical physicists is indefensible. Davis wants access to the hardware. Weinstein wants the right minds inserted. The question Davis asks: let us in. The question Weinstein asks is sharper: if you will not let physicists in, what exactly are you protecting? Full conversation covers all of this and much more. Special thanks to Missileman for co-hosting! One of the most important episodes we have ever done live now 👇

Jesse Michels

309,515 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"Very often what happens is that the architects die, and they leave a zombie. We seem to be in a zombie era." The whole time I was watching the discussion between Jesse Michels and Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis, I felt like there was some darker thing lurking beneath the surface that connects the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics as a scientific discipline, the extreme secrecy surrounding the alleged UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering program and the lack of any theoretical physicists working the problem, and the government's stated intention to control (per Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) the future of AI -- a future where there's no point investing in AI startups because “we [the government] are going to make sure that AI is going to be a function of two or three large companies. We will directly regulate and control those companies. There will be no startups.” And there's the other part Andreessen recounted from his White House meeting. He was told by the [Biden] administration that "During the Cold War, we [the federal government] classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community — entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed. If we decide we need to [for AI/math], we're going to do the same thing." Take a minute and think about that, because it's actually chilling. A clear precedent has been cited here -- one none of us knew about before Andreessen brought it to our attention -- and it raises two big questions: 1) Why? 2) HOW? Weinstein returns multiple times in this episode to the diminishingly small number of people who have the capacity to operate at the highest levels of physics and math. And whenever you have a small number of people who act as the natural gating function for something incredibly powerful, it's not a leap to imagine an additional layer of control being placed on them by pressure from outside. Whether that's through legal threats like "born secret," NDAs, direct threats of physical harm, money, regulation, etc., there are ways to lock down the gatekeepers so that they never do the thing -- at least not in public -- that the most powerful people in the world don't want them to do. Weinstein kept saying, about both the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics and the lack of physicists working the UAP problem, "this makes no sense." But it does make sense if you shift the frame to, "they don't want us to find the answers and are actively trying to stop us." The feeling I kept getting as I watched this fascinating discussion was that the legacy crash retrieval program used to have a lot more direct oversight and funding decades ago, but that the compartmentalization and secrecy around it turned it into more and more of an oxbow lake, and that as it got cut off from the conventional scientific community and defense establishment, it became more secretive, less well-funded, and less coordinated. So it kind of became its own siloed-off thing that fewer and fewer people knew about, but the people who did still know protected the territory fiercely. And then came the era of AAWSAP and AATIP and UAPTF, and without the deep, secret, institutional knowledge held by members of the legacy program, they tried to piece together what had happened in the past while not being able to penetrate the sort of firewall that existed partially because of controlled secrecy, and partially because of the firewalling effect of time. They were doing a lot of cold case file work, while running into the deepest of deep state secrecy efforts. That secrecy, at least based on my reading of the situation, was instituted decades ago, when the atomic-era scientific community (mostly the same group of geniuses that were at the top of the Manhattan Project) got together and -- probably at the behest of of the US government -- decided physics was becoming too dangerous if it continued down the path that it was on. So, as my spitball theory goes, they intentionally beached the entire enterprise on the shoals of string theory and quantized gravity and all the stuff Weinstein talks about everywhere he goes -- the "dogs that won't hunt" that are also "the only game in town." The very theories that have, in the real world, run physics aground. So let's come back to Andreessen's point here: they classified entire branches of physics and took them out of the research community, while real physics went off on a wild goose chase that has yielded precious few demonstrable results in the past half century or so. The effect is that the physics community has been off the scent for so long that anyone old enough to have held the knowledge that was shoved back into Pandora's proverbial box through extreme secrecy measures is now dead. And their taking of that knowledge to the grave may well be a critical part of the secrecy effort. Dead physicists tell no tales. I have this eerie sense that we scared ourselves shitless with certain discoveries (likely knowledge that followed from nuclear physics, which is itself still highly protected and curtailed) and decided that the only way to stop our headlong rush into world-ending catastrophe was to literally bury the knowledge and wait until everyone who had it died off. The government looks, at least to me, to have cauterized a destructive branch in the scientific timeline like they were the Time Variance Authority from Marvel comics. 80 years of claimed zero-progress in reverse-engineering alleged crashed or recovered UAPs. 40+ years of dead-ended physics. Only two or three major AI companies, one of which is now in a fight to the death with the Department of War. And the rumors that AI has "plateaued" or even "dead-ended" in its progress that keep springing up has potential echoes in the AI world of physics being diverted into String Theory. I'm not a mathematician or a physicist. I can't examine all the deeper particulars because I have neither the knowledge or the training. I only have surface level pattern recognition, and that tells me it all feels connected. The problem for the gatekeepers is that you can't bury knowledge that has been discovered once indefinitely. It's certain that all of this will be figured out again. And as Weinstein pointed out about a couple of non-physicists who figured out how to piece together nuclear weapons based on declassified information and publicly available knowledge, it IS happening. But it seems that at least on the individual basis, those green shoots are being pruned. Weinstein asks why none of the people who funded his education are "interested" in his Grand Unifying Theory. Weinstein is too well-known and too well-respected to just be taken out of play. They can't buy him off. They can't make him disappear without drawing more attention. So maybe they just hope that Geometric Unity will die on its own. Maybe they are behind the attacks on GU as something totally unserious. Maybe they have found a way to make other members of the physics community willing to look away. So, my question about this larger hypothetical operation to stop dangerous science and math is this: was it really just a massive kicking of the can down the road. Did they hoped it would buy us time? And if so, to what end? What are they waiting for? Can this game really be played forever? Maybe they think it can. Maybe they have an ongoing directive to keep suppressing this knowledge for as long as possible, and perhaps there's some secret core group whose job is to be the perpetual gatekeepers of potentially civilization-ending secrets. Maybe the Epstein connection to all of this was precisely because he was part of the operation to discover who was doing forbidden work and assess their progress. Maybe that's why, when he met Weinstein, he knew so much about GU. It's impossible to say with any certainty, but as a theory, it does have some real explanatory power. I find myself thinking of the fictional Brothers of the Cruciform Sword in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade -- a small, ancient, secret society whose job it was to keep tabs on people looking for the Holy Grail and stop them, so it doesn't fall into the wrong hands. Are we following the same track here? Could this, as crazy as it sounds, be the missing connective tissue in this mystery?

"Very often what happens is that the architects die, and they leave a zombie. We seem to be in a zombie era." The whole time I was watching the discussion between Jesse Michels and Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis, I felt like there was some darker thing lurking beneath the surface that connects the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics as a scientific discipline, the extreme secrecy surrounding the alleged UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering program and the lack of any theoretical physicists working the problem, and the government's stated intention to control (per Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) the future of AI -- a future where there's no point investing in AI startups because “we [the government] are going to make sure that AI is going to be a function of two or three large companies. We will directly regulate and control those companies. There will be no startups.” And there's the other part Andreessen recounted from his White House meeting. He was told by the [Biden] administration that "During the Cold War, we [the federal government] classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community — entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed. If we decide we need to [for AI/math], we're going to do the same thing." Take a minute and think about that, because it's actually chilling. A clear precedent has been cited here -- one none of us knew about before Andreessen brought it to our attention -- and it raises two big questions: 1) Why? 2) HOW? Weinstein returns multiple times in this episode to the diminishingly small number of people who have the capacity to operate at the highest levels of physics and math. And whenever you have a small number of people who act as the natural gating function for something incredibly powerful, it's not a leap to imagine an additional layer of control being placed on them by pressure from outside. Whether that's through legal threats like "born secret," NDAs, direct threats of physical harm, money, regulation, etc., there are ways to lock down the gatekeepers so that they never do the thing -- at least not in public -- that the most powerful people in the world don't want them to do. Weinstein kept saying, about both the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics and the lack of physicists working the UAP problem, "this makes no sense." But it does make sense if you shift the frame to, "they don't want us to find the answers and are actively trying to stop us." The feeling I kept getting as I watched this fascinating discussion was that the legacy crash retrieval program used to have a lot more direct oversight and funding decades ago, but that the compartmentalization and secrecy around it turned it into more and more of an oxbow lake, and that as it got cut off from the conventional scientific community and defense establishment, it became more secretive, less well-funded, and less coordinated. So it kind of became its own siloed-off thing that fewer and fewer people knew about, but the people who did still know protected the territory fiercely. And then came the era of AAWSAP and AATIP and UAPTF, and without the deep, secret, institutional knowledge held by members of the legacy program, they tried to piece together what had happened in the past while not being able to penetrate the sort of firewall that existed partially because of controlled secrecy, and partially because of the firewalling effect of time. They were doing a lot of cold case file work, while running into the deepest of deep state secrecy efforts. That secrecy, at least based on my reading of the situation, was instituted decades ago, when the atomic-era scientific community (mostly the same group of geniuses that were at the top of the Manhattan Project) got together and -- probably at the behest of of the US government -- decided physics was becoming too dangerous if it continued down the path that it was on. So, as my spitball theory goes, they intentionally beached the entire enterprise on the shoals of string theory and quantized gravity and all the stuff Weinstein talks about everywhere he goes -- the "dogs that won't hunt" that are also "the only game in town." The very theories that have, in the real world, run physics aground. So let's come back to Andreessen's point here: they classified entire branches of physics and took them out of the research community, while real physics went off on a wild goose chase that has yielded precious few demonstrable results in the past half century or so. The effect is that the physics community has been off the scent for so long that anyone old enough to have held the knowledge that was shoved back into Pandora's proverbial box through extreme secrecy measures is now dead. And their taking of that knowledge to the grave may well be a critical part of the secrecy effort. Dead physicists tell no tales. I have this eerie sense that we scared ourselves shitless with certain discoveries (likely knowledge that followed from nuclear physics, which is itself still highly protected and curtailed) and decided that the only way to stop our headlong rush into world-ending catastrophe was to literally bury the knowledge and wait until everyone who had it died off. The government looks, at least to me, to have cauterized a destructive branch in the scientific timeline like they were the Time Variance Authority from Marvel comics. 80 years of claimed zero-progress in reverse-engineering alleged crashed or recovered UAPs. 40+ years of dead-ended physics. Only two or three major AI companies, one of which is now in a fight to the death with the Department of War. And the rumors that AI has "plateaued" or even "dead-ended" in its progress that keep springing up has potential echoes in the AI world of physics being diverted into String Theory. I'm not a mathematician or a physicist. I can't examine all the deeper particulars because I have neither the knowledge or the training. I only have surface level pattern recognition, and that tells me it all feels connected. The problem for the gatekeepers is that you can't bury knowledge that has been discovered once indefinitely. It's certain that all of this will be figured out again. And as Weinstein pointed out about a couple of non-physicists who figured out how to piece together nuclear weapons based on declassified information and publicly available knowledge, it IS happening. But it seems that at least on the individual basis, those green shoots are being pruned. Weinstein asks why none of the people who funded his education are "interested" in his Grand Unifying Theory. Weinstein is too well-known and too well-respected to just be taken out of play. They can't buy him off. They can't make him disappear without drawing more attention. So maybe they just hope that Geometric Unity will die on its own. Maybe they are behind the attacks on GU as something totally unserious. Maybe they have found a way to make other members of the physics community willing to look away. So, my question about this larger hypothetical operation to stop dangerous science and math is this: was it really just a massive kicking of the can down the road. Did they hoped it would buy us time? And if so, to what end? What are they waiting for? Can this game really be played forever? Maybe they think it can. Maybe they have an ongoing directive to keep suppressing this knowledge for as long as possible, and perhaps there's some secret core group whose job is to be the perpetual gatekeepers of potentially civilization-ending secrets. Maybe the Epstein connection to all of this was precisely because he was part of the operation to discover who was doing forbidden work and assess their progress. Maybe that's why, when he met Weinstein, he knew so much about GU. It's impossible to say with any certainty, but as a theory, it does have some real explanatory power. I find myself thinking of the fictional Brothers of the Cruciform Sword in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade -- a small, ancient, secret society whose job it was to keep tabs on people looking for the Holy Grail and stop them, so it doesn't fall into the wrong hands. Are we following the same track here? Could this, as crazy as it sounds, be the missing connective tissue in this mystery?

Steve Skojec

13,976 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jimmy Dore: “THEY LIED ABOUT EVERYTHING.” “They lied about masks.” “They lied about natural immunity.” “They lied about the vaccine stopping transmission.” “They lied about lockdowns.” “They lied about where the virus came from.” “They lied about who funded the gain-of-function research.” “They lied that they were even doing gain-of-function research.” “You can’t trust the medical journals, because they’re all bribed.” “We found out early on that 1 in 800 Covid vaccines produced a serious adverse event.” “If you go back to the swine flu, it was 1 in 100,000 produced a serious adverse event, and they pulled that vaccine immediately.” “So, I don’t have any trust at all in any government organization.” “Now that RFK is there, it’s so funny that we finally have a guy who is Big Pharma is scared of … and that’s what the left in America has always been skeptical of—Big Pharma.” “We know they’re criminals.” “And then something happened where they flipped, and they became the defenders of Big Pharma.” “They turned science into a religion.” Jimmy Dore John Campbell

Jimmy Dore: “THEY LIED ABOUT EVERYTHING.” “They lied about masks.” “They lied about natural immunity.” “They lied about the vaccine stopping transmission.” “They lied about lockdowns.” “They lied about where the virus came from.” “They lied about who funded the gain-of-function research.” “They lied that they were even doing gain-of-function research.” “You can’t trust the medical journals, because they’re all bribed.” “We found out early on that 1 in 800 Covid vaccines produced a serious adverse event.” “If you go back to the swine flu, it was 1 in 100,000 produced a serious adverse event, and they pulled that vaccine immediately.” “So, I don’t have any trust at all in any government organization.” “Now that RFK is there, it’s so funny that we finally have a guy who is Big Pharma is scared of … and that’s what the left in America has always been skeptical of—Big Pharma.” “We know they’re criminals.” “And then something happened where they flipped, and they became the defenders of Big Pharma.” “They turned science into a religion.” Jimmy Dore John Campbell

Holden Culotta

265,959 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Eric Weinstein presents a stunning and urgent thesis: the fundamental progress of theoretical physics was deliberately and mysteriously halted in the early 1970s. We have been living in a state of intellectual stagnation for over half a century, with our deepest understanding of reality frozen in time. The evidence is chilling. He points to a meeting where Marc Andreessen was reportedly told by the Biden White House that they had deliberately stagnated fields of theoretical physics. This is not an accident; it is policy. The data is undeniable. Look at the age of the youngest living Nobel Laureate in theoretical physics. For generations, this number remained below 50, signaling a vibrant field producing groundbreaking work by young minds. Then, around the rise of string theory as the dominant "theory of quantum gravity," that trend stopped. The youngest living laureate is now over 70. The field is no longer generating the kind of results that shatter paradigms and win Nobel prizes. How was this "soft sunset" of the world's brightest minds achieved? A small group of institutions took a few theories—string theory preeminent among them—and cocooned them, declaring them the "only game in town." All competitor theories were systematically starved of funding and credibility. Careers were ended for those who dared to look elsewhere. The mechanism of control was a mantra, repeated until it became unquestioned dogma: "Quantum gravity is the holy grail." This single, narrow focus became the entire purpose of fundamental physics. Yet, as Weinstein notes, this "holy grail" barely existed in the scientific lexicon before 1972. The pursuit is a safe, sterile one that threatens no existing power structures and leads to no tangible technological breakthroughs. But this terrible realization contains a seed of profound hope. If we can identify this manufactured stagnation, we can break free from it. The imperative is existential. Earth is our womb, not our home. To secure an indefinite human future and traverse the cosmos, we must move beyond our current, incomplete physics. We must surpass Einstein's speed limit of 'c'. The tools are too powerful to remain confined to one planet. The path forward requires revitalizing Western science, but our greatest competition is not where we think. While some fear the rise of China and India, Weinstein argues the true intellectual threat—and potential—lies with the world's greatest mathematicians in France. We are at a precipice. We have a brief window of vitality before geopolitical pressures erupt. If we choose to revitalize physics, to shatter the cocoon and encourage dangerous, heretical ideas once more, the rewards could be the universe itself. The end of physics is not a surrender; it is a finish line we have yet to cross. Reaching it may bring wonders beyond our imagination and a future among the stars that is glorious indeed. The stagnation was a choice. Progress can be one, too.

Eric Weinstein presents a stunning and urgent thesis: the fundamental progress of theoretical physics was deliberately and mysteriously halted in the early 1970s. We have been living in a state of intellectual stagnation for over half a century, with our deepest understanding of reality frozen in time. The evidence is chilling. He points to a meeting where Marc Andreessen was reportedly told by the Biden White House that they had deliberately stagnated fields of theoretical physics. This is not an accident; it is policy. The data is undeniable. Look at the age of the youngest living Nobel Laureate in theoretical physics. For generations, this number remained below 50, signaling a vibrant field producing groundbreaking work by young minds. Then, around the rise of string theory as the dominant "theory of quantum gravity," that trend stopped. The youngest living laureate is now over 70. The field is no longer generating the kind of results that shatter paradigms and win Nobel prizes. How was this "soft sunset" of the world's brightest minds achieved? A small group of institutions took a few theories—string theory preeminent among them—and cocooned them, declaring them the "only game in town." All competitor theories were systematically starved of funding and credibility. Careers were ended for those who dared to look elsewhere. The mechanism of control was a mantra, repeated until it became unquestioned dogma: "Quantum gravity is the holy grail." This single, narrow focus became the entire purpose of fundamental physics. Yet, as Weinstein notes, this "holy grail" barely existed in the scientific lexicon before 1972. The pursuit is a safe, sterile one that threatens no existing power structures and leads to no tangible technological breakthroughs. But this terrible realization contains a seed of profound hope. If we can identify this manufactured stagnation, we can break free from it. The imperative is existential. Earth is our womb, not our home. To secure an indefinite human future and traverse the cosmos, we must move beyond our current, incomplete physics. We must surpass Einstein's speed limit of 'c'. The tools are too powerful to remain confined to one planet. The path forward requires revitalizing Western science, but our greatest competition is not where we think. While some fear the rise of China and India, Weinstein argues the true intellectual threat—and potential—lies with the world's greatest mathematicians in France. We are at a precipice. We have a brief window of vitality before geopolitical pressures erupt. If we choose to revitalize physics, to shatter the cocoon and encourage dangerous, heretical ideas once more, the rewards could be the universe itself. The end of physics is not a surrender; it is a finish line we have yet to cross. Reaching it may bring wonders beyond our imagination and a future among the stars that is glorious indeed. The stagnation was a choice. Progress can be one, too.

Camus

537,382 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

A few days ago, 161 classified UAP files were released to the public that include more than 400 incidents of previously unseen videos showing ‘unclassified objects’ around the world and the truth is, I still don’t know what to believe… Which is exactly why I wanted to have today’s discussion. Dan Farah and Dr Harold Puthoff join me on The Diary Of A CEO to understand why this subject has suddenly become impossible to ignore. Dan has spent years interviewing senior military officials, intelligence figures and government insiders for his documentary The Age of Disclosure. Harold has spent decades working with organisations including the NSA, CIA and Department of Defense studying advanced aerospace science and physics. One of the things I’ve always struggled with conspiracies like this is that I don’t know why that information would necessarily fall into the hands of government officials. If there was something out there, we would have seen a very clear image of this thing by now. What I’m trying to do is interrogate this from all angles. Could it have been something else??

A few days ago, 161 classified UAP files were released to the public that include more than 400 incidents of previously unseen videos showing ‘unclassified objects’ around the world and the truth is, I still don’t know what to believe… Which is exactly why I wanted to have today’s discussion. Dan Farah and Dr Harold Puthoff join me on The Diary Of A CEO to understand why this subject has suddenly become impossible to ignore. Dan has spent years interviewing senior military officials, intelligence figures and government insiders for his documentary The Age of Disclosure. Harold has spent decades working with organisations including the NSA, CIA and Department of Defense studying advanced aerospace science and physics. One of the things I’ve always struggled with conspiracies like this is that I don’t know why that information would necessarily fall into the hands of government officials. If there was something out there, we would have seen a very clear image of this thing by now. What I’m trying to do is interrogate this from all angles. Could it have been something else??

Steven Bartlett

42,040 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Military and aeronautics DEFENSE CONTRACTORS blocking the BIGGEST story in HISTORY. What kind of technology are they so afraid of us finding out about and where and what kind of BLACK PROJECTS is all this MONEY DISSAPPERAING into? Do they actually possess OFF-WORLD technology? "One fighter pilot claimed that the UAP vehicles that we are seeing are DEFINETELY NOT ALL OF OURS and that one came as close as to 14ft away from his canopy while in flight at high speeds and took off at speeds and did maneuvers that would DESTROY the human body." Well over $23 TRILLION dollars have already disappeared into deep BLACK PROJECTS, aka: The Breakaway Civilization. What if I told you that they have technology and physics that they are purposely keeping from the general public and they've been bleeding our country dry to advance a small elite group of people and not the rest of the population? Is it really that hard to believe? It's TIME the TRUTH comes out. The TIME is NOW. cc: Tucker Carlson, Tim Burchett, TCN

Military and aeronautics DEFENSE CONTRACTORS blocking the BIGGEST story in HISTORY. What kind of technology are they so afraid of us finding out about and where and what kind of BLACK PROJECTS is all this MONEY DISSAPPERAING into? Do they actually possess OFF-WORLD technology? "One fighter pilot claimed that the UAP vehicles that we are seeing are DEFINETELY NOT ALL OF OURS and that one came as close as to 14ft away from his canopy while in flight at high speeds and took off at speeds and did maneuvers that would DESTROY the human body." Well over $23 TRILLION dollars have already disappeared into deep BLACK PROJECTS, aka: The Breakaway Civilization. What if I told you that they have technology and physics that they are purposely keeping from the general public and they've been bleeding our country dry to advance a small elite group of people and not the rest of the population? Is it really that hard to believe? It's TIME the TRUTH comes out. The TIME is NOW. cc: Tucker Carlson, Tim Burchett, TCN

The SCIF

30,551 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

There have always been moments in history when the unthinkable or the unspeakable have occurred. Moments recorded in the pages of history, where we must use our imagination to conjure up images of the pain and suffering those that lived through those moments endured. Never in a million years do we ever imagine from the lofty height of our comfortable existence, WE will become the subject of one of those stories that future generations will look upon in the same way today we look upon 1930’s Germany. I have taken the liberty of adapting the now famous words of Pastor Martin Niemöller First they came for the black people And I did not speak out Because I was not black. Then they came for the Mexicans And I did not speak out Because I was not a Mexican. Then they came for the Muslims And I did not speak out Because I was not a Muslim Then they aided and abetted Israel to murder Palestinian women and children And I did not speak out Because I was not a Palestinian Then they came for the LGBTQ + community And I did not speak out Because I was not a member of that community. Then they came for the poor, the vulnerable and the disabled And I did not speak out Because I was none of these. Then they came for the students and the Universities And I did not speak out Because I was not a student Then they came for the journalists And I did not speak out Because I was not a journalist Then they came for the lawyers And I did not speak out Because I was not a lawyer Then they came for Medicaid And I did not speak out Because I was not on Medicaid Then they came for the Social Security And I did not speak out Because I did not need Social Security. Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me History will judge us not for who we are, but what we did in a moment when democracy whimpered in a dark corner of the room begging to be protected from a malign force intent on reducing two and a half centuries of progress to ashes. In this moment of peril, history will ask, did we subjugate our values, our hopes and aspirations to a convicted criminal and adjudicated rapist? Or did we stand firm as did members of our military, many of whom made the ultimate sacrifice, that we may honor their sacrifice in this moment, and stand against the very threat they gave their lives to defend us from. Never in the history of this great nation has there been a moment when the resolve of its people means so much to so many around the world. Nations now threatened by a man leading an international crime syndicate and extortion gang from behind the sacred resolute desk, on which laws that have formed the very foundations of the global order have been signed. Laws that America has upheld, protected and preserved for decades as it led the world since the end of World War Two. Democracy and freedom deserve better than to live in fear of a madman who serves nobody but himself and his obscenely rich accomplices. Martin Luther King Jr had a dream, but it looked nothing like this. 🎥 TikTok -

There have always been moments in history when the unthinkable or the unspeakable have occurred. Moments recorded in the pages of history, where we must use our imagination to conjure up images of the pain and suffering those that lived through those moments endured. Never in a million years do we ever imagine from the lofty height of our comfortable existence, WE will become the subject of one of those stories that future generations will look upon in the same way today we look upon 1930’s Germany. I have taken the liberty of adapting the now famous words of Pastor Martin Niemöller First they came for the black people And I did not speak out Because I was not black. Then they came for the Mexicans And I did not speak out Because I was not a Mexican. Then they came for the Muslims And I did not speak out Because I was not a Muslim Then they aided and abetted Israel to murder Palestinian women and children And I did not speak out Because I was not a Palestinian Then they came for the LGBTQ + community And I did not speak out Because I was not a member of that community. Then they came for the poor, the vulnerable and the disabled And I did not speak out Because I was none of these. Then they came for the students and the Universities And I did not speak out Because I was not a student Then they came for the journalists And I did not speak out Because I was not a journalist Then they came for the lawyers And I did not speak out Because I was not a lawyer Then they came for Medicaid And I did not speak out Because I was not on Medicaid Then they came for the Social Security And I did not speak out Because I did not need Social Security. Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me History will judge us not for who we are, but what we did in a moment when democracy whimpered in a dark corner of the room begging to be protected from a malign force intent on reducing two and a half centuries of progress to ashes. In this moment of peril, history will ask, did we subjugate our values, our hopes and aspirations to a convicted criminal and adjudicated rapist? Or did we stand firm as did members of our military, many of whom made the ultimate sacrifice, that we may honor their sacrifice in this moment, and stand against the very threat they gave their lives to defend us from. Never in the history of this great nation has there been a moment when the resolve of its people means so much to so many around the world. Nations now threatened by a man leading an international crime syndicate and extortion gang from behind the sacred resolute desk, on which laws that have formed the very foundations of the global order have been signed. Laws that America has upheld, protected and preserved for decades as it led the world since the end of World War Two. Democracy and freedom deserve better than to live in fear of a madman who serves nobody but himself and his obscenely rich accomplices. Martin Luther King Jr had a dream, but it looked nothing like this. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

15,550 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔥🛸 "The startling thing is, is he's [the late Jim Ryder at Lockheed] revealing that he was one of the engineers that worked on the crash retrieval program with four other individuals." ~Eric Davis 🛸🔥 During AAWSAP, a senior VP at Lockheed (this is the late Jim Ryder) briefed Hal Puthoff, Colm Kelleher and Robert Bigelow, in a SCIF, about the crash retrieval program and that he (Ryder) had worked on for 20 years with four other people. In later interactions, he told Davis the same thing. They were all briefed up to the TS-SCI level but when they had more detailed questions, Ryder couldn't answer them because, "that's now rising up to the level of what's called the Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program, which is the security cover that was provided for ALL of the crash retrieval programs that were going on since...probably that Italian crash of 1933 that had gotten recovered by the U.S. Army during its invasion of Italy in 1944, and transferred back to Wright Army Airfield that year. "This was kind of startling because now it's like, okay we're actually talking to somebody (Ryder) who's at a senior executive level in a major aerospace defense corporation that's pretty huge, and it's actually the largest in the world. And, of course, this is all in classified settings, so we know this is all legitimate. The only problem is we couldn't get further because we needed to get Waived Unacknowledged SAP clearances, and, unfortunately, I don't know what was going on in the background with that. I do know that Harry Reid and Jim Lacatksi attempted to get that kind of security clearances for all of us and Harry Reid failed because the Deputy Secretary of Defense during that period...William Lynn in the Obama administration. So [Lynn] turned down Harry Reid's request."

🔥🛸 "The startling thing is, is he's [the late Jim Ryder at Lockheed] revealing that he was one of the engineers that worked on the crash retrieval program with four other individuals." ~Eric Davis 🛸🔥 During AAWSAP, a senior VP at Lockheed (this is the late Jim Ryder) briefed Hal Puthoff, Colm Kelleher and Robert Bigelow, in a SCIF, about the crash retrieval program and that he (Ryder) had worked on for 20 years with four other people. In later interactions, he told Davis the same thing. They were all briefed up to the TS-SCI level but when they had more detailed questions, Ryder couldn't answer them because, "that's now rising up to the level of what's called the Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program, which is the security cover that was provided for ALL of the crash retrieval programs that were going on since...probably that Italian crash of 1933 that had gotten recovered by the U.S. Army during its invasion of Italy in 1944, and transferred back to Wright Army Airfield that year. "This was kind of startling because now it's like, okay we're actually talking to somebody (Ryder) who's at a senior executive level in a major aerospace defense corporation that's pretty huge, and it's actually the largest in the world. And, of course, this is all in classified settings, so we know this is all legitimate. The only problem is we couldn't get further because we needed to get Waived Unacknowledged SAP clearances, and, unfortunately, I don't know what was going on in the background with that. I do know that Harry Reid and Jim Lacatksi attempted to get that kind of security clearances for all of us and Harry Reid failed because the Deputy Secretary of Defense during that period...William Lynn in the Obama administration. So [Lynn] turned down Harry Reid's request."

Joe Murgia

27,183 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

The All-In Podcast

79,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Fred Matiang’i on River Yala killings: We asked IG Mutyambai what was happening at that time. We agreed that the gravity of the situation is such that the DCI himself should go to that place and find out what is happening. When they came back, we asked for an inquest. By the time we were leaving government, the file was opened. I didn’t leave with the file. The best way to deal with this matter, in my view, is to have a public inquest so that all of us role players who were in the security sector at that point in time, we go, face the inquest and say what we know about it #CitizenExplainer Sam Gituku

Fred Matiang’i on River Yala killings: We asked IG Mutyambai what was happening at that time. We agreed that the gravity of the situation is such that the DCI himself should go to that place and find out what is happening. When they came back, we asked for an inquest. By the time we were leaving government, the file was opened. I didn’t leave with the file. The best way to deal with this matter, in my view, is to have a public inquest so that all of us role players who were in the security sector at that point in time, we go, face the inquest and say what we know about it #CitizenExplainer Sam Gituku

Citizen TV Kenya

167,681 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Ross Coulthart: Lockheed Martin CEO dropped a bombshell. On a July 22 earnings call, James Taiclet was grilled over a $1B cost blowout on a classified Skunk Works project. His reply? “That’s the nature of something of this magical status. This is a highly classified program… a game changing capability for our U.S. and international customers. We probably won’t be able to talk about it for many years to come.” Read that again. Magical, game changing. Hidden in the books under “national security exemptions,” shielded from shareholders who by law should be told about anything that materially impacts value. Ross Coulthart points out, hypersonics aren’t “magical.” Russia’s been ahead in that field for years. So what is Lockheed really sitting on? 🛸 Anti-gravitics? Reverse engineered tech? Something pulled straight from the vaults of a retrieval program? If you’re a shareholder, you won’t get an answer. But the fact that Lockheed’s CEO is openly hinting at “magical” technology they can’t reveal for years should have everyone asking the question: What did they find, and how long have they had it? Source NewsNation: #UAP #Disclosure #Lockheed #SkunkWorks #AntiGravity

🚨 Ross Coulthart: Lockheed Martin CEO dropped a bombshell. On a July 22 earnings call, James Taiclet was grilled over a $1B cost blowout on a classified Skunk Works project. His reply? “That’s the nature of something of this magical status. This is a highly classified program… a game changing capability for our U.S. and international customers. We probably won’t be able to talk about it for many years to come.” Read that again. Magical, game changing. Hidden in the books under “national security exemptions,” shielded from shareholders who by law should be told about anything that materially impacts value. Ross Coulthart points out, hypersonics aren’t “magical.” Russia’s been ahead in that field for years. So what is Lockheed really sitting on? 🛸 Anti-gravitics? Reverse engineered tech? Something pulled straight from the vaults of a retrieval program? If you’re a shareholder, you won’t get an answer. But the fact that Lockheed’s CEO is openly hinting at “magical” technology they can’t reveal for years should have everyone asking the question: What did they find, and how long have they had it? Source NewsNation: #UAP #Disclosure #Lockheed #SkunkWorks #AntiGravity

Skywatch Signal

60,108 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“My employers will f**king fry me if I speak out about this.” “I am capable of building and designing an aircraft that can go 210 times the speed of light.” Jay Anderson just told Joe Rogan that a Lockheed Skunk Works engineer admitted to reverse-engineering UFOs. Three large flying saucers called “alien reproduction vehicles” were allegedly revealed at a private air show in 1988. But the terrifying part is this: They were classified as “instantaneous nuclear payload delivery systems.” Anderson: “Mark McCandlish, military illustrator, had a friend called Brad Sorensen.” “Brad Sorensen was a government guy, aerospace engineer, Lockheed Martin—quite an extensive portfolio.” “Brad Sorensen goes to his buddy one day, Mark McCandlish, and he says, I was shown something and I want you to … create the illustration.” “Brad Sorensen says that … he was invited to a private air show at Lockheed Martin by … a good friend of his in the military.” “They bring him into a hanger in Lockheed Martin where three large saucers of varying size were hovering a few feet off of the ground.” “They were described as ‘instantaneous nuclear payload delivery systems.’” “Brad Sorensen has never gone public.” “But I was in the room when he was phoned [a couple of years ago], and I’ve heard him say things that have never been on the record before.” “My friend introduces himself to him and … asked him about Mark McCandlish and this alien reproduction vehicle.” “And Brad Sorensen went off on quite a diatribe actually … and said: I gave this man the keys to the kingdom and he went out and told the whole f**king world, and I will never do that because my employers will fry me.” “He said: they will f**king fry me if I speak out about this, but I am capable of building and designing an aircraft that can go 210 times the speed of light.” Jay Anderson Joe Rogan

“My employers will fking fry me if I speak out about this.” “I am capable of building and designing an aircraft that can go 210 times the speed of light.” Jay Anderson just told Joe Rogan that a Lockheed Skunk Works engineer admitted to reverse-engineering UFOs. Three large flying saucers called “alien reproduction vehicles” were allegedly revealed at a private air show in 1988. But the terrifying part is this: They were classified as “instantaneous nuclear payload delivery systems.” Anderson: “Mark McCandlish, military illustrator, had a friend called Brad Sorensen.” “Brad Sorensen was a government guy, aerospace engineer, Lockheed Martin—quite an extensive portfolio.” “Brad Sorensen goes to his buddy one day, Mark McCandlish, and he says, I was shown something and I want you to … create the illustration.” “Brad Sorensen says that … he was invited to a private air show at Lockheed Martin by … a good friend of his in the military.” “They bring him into a hanger in Lockheed Martin where three large saucers of varying size were hovering a few feet off of the ground.” “They were described as ‘instantaneous nuclear payload delivery systems.’” “Brad Sorensen has never gone public.” “But I was in the room when he was phoned [a couple of years ago], and I’ve heard him say things that have never been on the record before.” “My friend introduces himself to him and … asked him about Mark McCandlish and this alien reproduction vehicle.” “And Brad Sorensen went off on quite a diatribe actually … and said: I gave this man the keys to the kingdom and he went out and told the whole fking world, and I will never do that because my employers will fry me.” “He said: they will f**king fry me if I speak out about this, but I am capable of building and designing an aircraft that can go 210 times the speed of light.” Jay Anderson Joe Rogan

Holden Culotta

2,931,676 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Chamath: "Nvidia is not doing what's in the best interest of the United States." 🇺🇸🇨🇳 "I think we can all do the math. About 47% of all of NVIDIA's revenue goes to China and Chinese-related countries." "And I think when you peel back this onion, what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a waystation for China." "And I think that is the big problem." "Let's have a thought starter: if 47% of all of the AI capability and horsepower is being shipped to three Asian countries, where do you think the apps that require that amount of horsepower live?" "Is there a Cursor of Bhutan that we did not know? Is there a great shopping app in Cambodia that's come out of nowhere, that's AI powered?" "I think the answer is no." "Every single time we have an advance in the United States, how is it that Alibaba shows up with something incredible? DeepSeek shows up with something better?" "At every turn and at every step of AI, they are at the same rate or one step ahead." "To be honest with you, I think the real problem that we have is that Nvidia is not doing what is in the best interest of the United States." "You have a American company that has been working around the guidelines at every turn to try to land silicon into the hands of China." "Late last year, they introduced this thing called the H20 that was explicitly designed for China and to be compliant with US rules at the time." "Which again, gives these guys substantial performance." "This is a case where (Nvidia) has plausible deniability. I sell something to a Singaporean registered company? Plausible deniability." "What am I supposed to do? You can't expect me to audit it. I think that's what NVIDIA's answer will be to this question." "But what is the real expectation? At a minimum, the United States should have a mechanism to understand it." "It is implausible that if you did one or two layers of work, you would not find that most of this traffic is being used by Chinese organizations."

Chamath: "Nvidia is not doing what's in the best interest of the United States." 🇺🇸🇨🇳 "I think we can all do the math. About 47% of all of NVIDIA's revenue goes to China and Chinese-related countries." "And I think when you peel back this onion, what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a waystation for China." "And I think that is the big problem." "Let's have a thought starter: if 47% of all of the AI capability and horsepower is being shipped to three Asian countries, where do you think the apps that require that amount of horsepower live?" "Is there a Cursor of Bhutan that we did not know? Is there a great shopping app in Cambodia that's come out of nowhere, that's AI powered?" "I think the answer is no." "Every single time we have an advance in the United States, how is it that Alibaba shows up with something incredible? DeepSeek shows up with something better?" "At every turn and at every step of AI, they are at the same rate or one step ahead." "To be honest with you, I think the real problem that we have is that Nvidia is not doing what is in the best interest of the United States." "You have a American company that has been working around the guidelines at every turn to try to land silicon into the hands of China." "Late last year, they introduced this thing called the H20 that was explicitly designed for China and to be compliant with US rules at the time." "Which again, gives these guys substantial performance." "This is a case where (Nvidia) has plausible deniability. I sell something to a Singaporean registered company? Plausible deniability." "What am I supposed to do? You can't expect me to audit it. I think that's what NVIDIA's answer will be to this question." "But what is the real expectation? At a minimum, the United States should have a mechanism to understand it." "It is implausible that if you did one or two layers of work, you would not find that most of this traffic is being used by Chinese organizations."

The All-In Podcast

910,450 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

RARE MKULTRA TESTIMONY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RADIATION EXPERIMENTS This is a testimony from Chris DeNicola and Claudia Mullen concerning shocking levels of torture, sexual exploitation and behavioral modification at the hands of several MKULTRA researchers and scientists, notably Dr. L. Wilson Greene, Martin T. Orne, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, Morse Allen, and Dr. Robert G. Heath. What makes Claudia Mullen's testimony especially relevant is according to a written statement by then Professor of Law Alan W. Scheflin who has looked at thousands of MKULTRA documents and is recognized judicially in both federal and state courts as an expert witness in mind control “some of the information Claudia has provided is absolutely true and could not have been derived from any published. source.” These are just two of thousands of unfortunate victims of this program who were tortured and experimented on in secret with the help of literal Nazis and Japanese maniac “doctors” the CIA smuggled into the US post-WWII. All with the help of academic institutions that never paid for their participation in this sick human experimentation. Do you really think they stopped? Look around, they have turned the world into a laboratory of human experimentation now.

RARE MKULTRA TESTIMONY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RADIATION EXPERIMENTS This is a testimony from Chris DeNicola and Claudia Mullen concerning shocking levels of torture, sexual exploitation and behavioral modification at the hands of several MKULTRA researchers and scientists, notably Dr. L. Wilson Greene, Martin T. Orne, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, Morse Allen, and Dr. Robert G. Heath. What makes Claudia Mullen's testimony especially relevant is according to a written statement by then Professor of Law Alan W. Scheflin who has looked at thousands of MKULTRA documents and is recognized judicially in both federal and state courts as an expert witness in mind control “some of the information Claudia has provided is absolutely true and could not have been derived from any published. source.” These are just two of thousands of unfortunate victims of this program who were tortured and experimented on in secret with the help of literal Nazis and Japanese maniac “doctors” the CIA smuggled into the US post-WWII. All with the help of academic institutions that never paid for their participation in this sick human experimentation. Do you really think they stopped? Look around, they have turned the world into a laboratory of human experimentation now.

Champagne Joshi

226,428 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Did you know there might be a second language on the Book of Mormon gold plates? Most Latter-day Saints have heard that the plates were written in Reformed Egyptian, but not as many people realize that the Book of Mormon started as essentially a different language first. And the relationship between these two languages, I believe, supports the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. What the Nephite language started as, is described in the first chapter of the book of Mormon as "the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians." Scholars have theorized that this first language could contain a mix of Hebrew and Egyptian features. So the Book of Mormon writing may have started out looking something like this, a Judahite variety of Egyptian known as Palestinian Hieratic that is attested in Lehi and Nephi’s day. But languages don’t stay static. After hundreds of years, it seems this earlier Egyptian language evolved into a modified, or Reformed Egyptian, as Moroni calls it at the end of the book. So maybe something like this. Since the writings of Nephi and Mormon both appear to be included on plates that became the Book of Mormon, one would expect their languages to look different. And Martin Harris’s visit to Professor Charles Anthon may show evidence of this shift. New research reveals Anthon may have seen two different transcripts: one that resembled Egyptian—like at the beginning of the Book of Mormon— and another that was harder to identify, just like we’d expect from an evolving, reformed language. Language changing over time is totally natural—just look at how different English was a few hundred years ago! So this shift in the Book of Mormon’s language is exactly what we’d expect from an authentic, ancient record. If you want to learn more, read KnoWhy 774 at Scripture Central.

Did you know there might be a second language on the Book of Mormon gold plates? Most Latter-day Saints have heard that the plates were written in Reformed Egyptian, but not as many people realize that the Book of Mormon started as essentially a different language first. And the relationship between these two languages, I believe, supports the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. What the Nephite language started as, is described in the first chapter of the book of Mormon as "the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians." Scholars have theorized that this first language could contain a mix of Hebrew and Egyptian features. So the Book of Mormon writing may have started out looking something like this, a Judahite variety of Egyptian known as Palestinian Hieratic that is attested in Lehi and Nephi’s day. But languages don’t stay static. After hundreds of years, it seems this earlier Egyptian language evolved into a modified, or Reformed Egyptian, as Moroni calls it at the end of the book. So maybe something like this. Since the writings of Nephi and Mormon both appear to be included on plates that became the Book of Mormon, one would expect their languages to look different. And Martin Harris’s visit to Professor Charles Anthon may show evidence of this shift. New research reveals Anthon may have seen two different transcripts: one that resembled Egyptian—like at the beginning of the Book of Mormon— and another that was harder to identify, just like we’d expect from an evolving, reformed language. Language changing over time is totally natural—just look at how different English was a few hundred years ago! So this shift in the Book of Mormon’s language is exactly what we’d expect from an authentic, ancient record. If you want to learn more, read KnoWhy 774 at Scripture Central.

ScripturePlus

11,129 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is probably the most INSANE Deep State story you've never heard. The State Department's Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers Darren Beattie debunks ProPublica’s claim that DOGE “targeted” an “Afghan scholar who fled the Taliban”: “There was a whole saga of a takeover of the US Institute of Peace under DOGE. Just to give you a sense of what these [US Institute of Peace workers] were like, they barricaded themselves in the offices. They sabotaged the physical infrastructure of the building. There were reports of loaded guns within the offices. There was one hostage situation where they held a security guard under basically kind of a false imprisonment type situation. It was extremely intense. Far more so than the better known story of USAID. And in the course of all of that, they tried to delete a TERABYTE of data of accounting information that would indicate what kind of stuff they were up to. What kind of people they were paying. And in the course of that, DOGE found that one of the people on their payroll was this curious figure who had a prominent role in the Taliban government and then seemed to play a bunch of angles across each other. The question is, what the heck is an organization like this doing having an individual who is a former Taliban member on their payroll?! I think even more bizarre than having this former Taliban guy on the payroll is the kind of schizophrenic posture in relation to Afghanistan exhibited by the US Institute of Peace. One truly bizarre thing is that one of the US Institute of Peace's main kind of policy agendas was basically lamenting the fact that the opium trade had DISSIPATED under Taliban leadership. They had multiple reports coming out, basically saying, ‘this is horrible that the opium trade is diminished under the Taliban. We need to find some way to restore it.’ How bizarre is that! The whole story of opium and Afghanistan and its connection to government entities is a very intricate and delicate and fascinating one. But it seems very clear that the US Institute of Peace was involved in that story to some degree. The ProPublica thing, as usual and as expected, was a total joke…What's very clear is he was a former Taliban guy, and he was probably one of these people who was playing all sides, made a lot of enemies. This has nothing to do with DOGE. This random former Taliban guy, I think his contract was $130,000.”

This is probably the most INSANE Deep State story you've never heard. The State Department's Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers Darren Beattie debunks ProPublica’s claim that DOGE “targeted” an “Afghan scholar who fled the Taliban”: “There was a whole saga of a takeover of the US Institute of Peace under DOGE. Just to give you a sense of what these [US Institute of Peace workers] were like, they barricaded themselves in the offices. They sabotaged the physical infrastructure of the building. There were reports of loaded guns within the offices. There was one hostage situation where they held a security guard under basically kind of a false imprisonment type situation. It was extremely intense. Far more so than the better known story of USAID. And in the course of all of that, they tried to delete a TERABYTE of data of accounting information that would indicate what kind of stuff they were up to. What kind of people they were paying. And in the course of that, DOGE found that one of the people on their payroll was this curious figure who had a prominent role in the Taliban government and then seemed to play a bunch of angles across each other. The question is, what the heck is an organization like this doing having an individual who is a former Taliban member on their payroll?! I think even more bizarre than having this former Taliban guy on the payroll is the kind of schizophrenic posture in relation to Afghanistan exhibited by the US Institute of Peace. One truly bizarre thing is that one of the US Institute of Peace's main kind of policy agendas was basically lamenting the fact that the opium trade had DISSIPATED under Taliban leadership. They had multiple reports coming out, basically saying, ‘this is horrible that the opium trade is diminished under the Taliban. We need to find some way to restore it.’ How bizarre is that! The whole story of opium and Afghanistan and its connection to government entities is a very intricate and delicate and fascinating one. But it seems very clear that the US Institute of Peace was involved in that story to some degree. The ProPublica thing, as usual and as expected, was a total joke…What's very clear is he was a former Taliban guy, and he was probably one of these people who was playing all sides, made a lot of enemies. This has nothing to do with DOGE. This random former Taliban guy, I think his contract was $130,000.”

Glenn Beck

82,470 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Origin of COVID: A Story of Deception, Weapons, and Failed Science In a recent discussion, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein laid out a compelling—and disturbing—narrative about the true origins of COVID-19. Far from a natural spillover, the evidence points to a lab origin, likely tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and a shadowy network of gain-of-function research. But this wasn’t just any lab: it was part of a global bioweapons program, disguised as public health research. Gain-of-function research—the deliberate enhancement of pathogens to increase their lethality or transmissibility—was central to this story. Weinstein argues that the natural leap of viruses from animals to humans is rare and difficult. Yet, in labs, scientists accelerated this process, creating pathogens that could infect and spread among people. The justification? Preparing for pandemics. The reality? A dual-use program with weapons potential. The story begins with Chinese miners in Yunnan province, exposed to bat coronaviruses. Six fell ill; three died. None transmitted the virus further. For researchers, this was a red flag: a virus that could infect humans but hadn’t yet mastered human-to-human spread. The mission became clear: find it, enhance it, weaponize it. Enter Anthony Fauci, the highest-paid U.S. federal employee, who Weinstein alleges was not just a public health official but the architect of a clandestine weapons program. When gain-of-function research was banned in the U.S. in 2015, Fauci didn’t stop—he offshored it to China, partnering with American and Chinese scientists like Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli. The result? A virus engineered for human transmission, which then escaped. The irony is bitter: Fauci, who funded the research that may have created SARS-CoV-2, became the world’s top advisor on combating it. His advice? Ignore early treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine—drugs with proven efficacy against RNA viruses—and wait until patients were critically ill. The “solution”? A gene therapy mislabeled as a vaccine, pushed while dissent was silenced. Weinstein’s conclusion is damning: Every recommendation from the architects of this research was wrong. Lockdowns, delayed treatment, and experimental “vaccines” failed, while safe, effective therapies were suppressed. The system wasn’t just incompetent—it was inverted. For those who still believe this was about public health, Weinstein points to the facts: - No benefit from gain-of-function research has ever materialized. - Lab leaks are common; pandemics from engineered pathogens are a known risk. - The real motive? A cryptic arms race, where pathogens are tools of power. This isn’t conspiracy theory—it’s a diagnosis of a broken system. The COVID saga reveals a global apparatus where science is weaponized, truth is censored, and human lives are collateral. For deeper insight, Weinstein recommends Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s The Wuhan Cover-Up and The Real Anthony Fauci—books that expose the hidden alliances, conflicts of interest, and catastrophic failures behind the pandemic. The question remains: Who benefits from a world where pandemics can be engineered—and who pays the price?

The Origin of COVID: A Story of Deception, Weapons, and Failed Science In a recent discussion, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein laid out a compelling—and disturbing—narrative about the true origins of COVID-19. Far from a natural spillover, the evidence points to a lab origin, likely tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and a shadowy network of gain-of-function research. But this wasn’t just any lab: it was part of a global bioweapons program, disguised as public health research. Gain-of-function research—the deliberate enhancement of pathogens to increase their lethality or transmissibility—was central to this story. Weinstein argues that the natural leap of viruses from animals to humans is rare and difficult. Yet, in labs, scientists accelerated this process, creating pathogens that could infect and spread among people. The justification? Preparing for pandemics. The reality? A dual-use program with weapons potential. The story begins with Chinese miners in Yunnan province, exposed to bat coronaviruses. Six fell ill; three died. None transmitted the virus further. For researchers, this was a red flag: a virus that could infect humans but hadn’t yet mastered human-to-human spread. The mission became clear: find it, enhance it, weaponize it. Enter Anthony Fauci, the highest-paid U.S. federal employee, who Weinstein alleges was not just a public health official but the architect of a clandestine weapons program. When gain-of-function research was banned in the U.S. in 2015, Fauci didn’t stop—he offshored it to China, partnering with American and Chinese scientists like Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli. The result? A virus engineered for human transmission, which then escaped. The irony is bitter: Fauci, who funded the research that may have created SARS-CoV-2, became the world’s top advisor on combating it. His advice? Ignore early treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine—drugs with proven efficacy against RNA viruses—and wait until patients were critically ill. The “solution”? A gene therapy mislabeled as a vaccine, pushed while dissent was silenced. Weinstein’s conclusion is damning: Every recommendation from the architects of this research was wrong. Lockdowns, delayed treatment, and experimental “vaccines” failed, while safe, effective therapies were suppressed. The system wasn’t just incompetent—it was inverted. For those who still believe this was about public health, Weinstein points to the facts: - No benefit from gain-of-function research has ever materialized. - Lab leaks are common; pandemics from engineered pathogens are a known risk. - The real motive? A cryptic arms race, where pathogens are tools of power. This isn’t conspiracy theory—it’s a diagnosis of a broken system. The COVID saga reveals a global apparatus where science is weaponized, truth is censored, and human lives are collateral. For deeper insight, Weinstein recommends Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s The Wuhan Cover-Up and The Real Anthony Fauci—books that expose the hidden alliances, conflicts of interest, and catastrophic failures behind the pandemic. The question remains: Who benefits from a world where pandemics can be engineered—and who pays the price?

Camus

14,380 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Bob Lazar is convinced the secret UFO program is a “cabal” more powerful than the government. And Epstein was involved. “It’s like this cabal is controlling science … ” Epstein said he killed Stanley Pons—who claimed he achieved cold fusion in 1989—in a 2009 email leaked in the new release of the files. Watch this fascinating moment from Lazar’s interview with Jesse Michels: Michels: “Did you get the sense that there were maybe mob ties?” Lazar: “Not that it was the mob, per se.” “These guys were disconnected from the government.” “They were their own cabal.” Michels: “It seems like they were going after your marriage, like it’s all blackmail techniques.” “It feels like it’s kompromat systems.” Lazar: “Yeah, they weren’t taking the legal angle at all.” Michels: “You see this stuff with the Epstein thing too, where there clearly was this distributed kind of kompromat system.” “And it deals with spooky science.” “Epstein is interviewed by Steve Bannon, and this is at the end of his life.” “[Bannon] goes, why did you put Zorro Ranch where you put it?” “And [Epstein] goes, a bunch of Los Alamos physicists were retiring … and I wanted to speak with them.” “And then you realized Bill Richardson was kind of in with the Clintons, and he was the Secretary of Energy, and he’s just systematically siphoning American nuclear secrets.” “There’s another email where [Epstein] said, I killed Pons back in the day.” “And he’s talking about Pons and Fleiscann, who were claiming to get cold fusion results.” “What is Epstein dealing with cold fusion?” “Then he’s hanging out at Harvard with the math department.” Lazar: “None of that makes any sense.” “I used to drive by that ranch all the time.” “I lived really close to it when I lived in New Mexico.” “And they always called it the Victoria’s Secret Ranch.” “Everyone knew that as the Victoria’s Secret Ranch.” Michels: “It’s because he was close with Les Wexner, who was the CEO and founder of Victoria’s Secret.” Lazar: “I didn’t know that … ” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Bob Lazar is convinced the secret UFO program is a “cabal” more powerful than the government. And Epstein was involved. “It’s like this cabal is controlling science … ” Epstein said he killed Stanley Pons—who claimed he achieved cold fusion in 1989—in a 2009 email leaked in the new release of the files. Watch this fascinating moment from Lazar’s interview with Jesse Michels: Michels: “Did you get the sense that there were maybe mob ties?” Lazar: “Not that it was the mob, per se.” “These guys were disconnected from the government.” “They were their own cabal.” Michels: “It seems like they were going after your marriage, like it’s all blackmail techniques.” “It feels like it’s kompromat systems.” Lazar: “Yeah, they weren’t taking the legal angle at all.” Michels: “You see this stuff with the Epstein thing too, where there clearly was this distributed kind of kompromat system.” “And it deals with spooky science.” “Epstein is interviewed by Steve Bannon, and this is at the end of his life.” “[Bannon] goes, why did you put Zorro Ranch where you put it?” “And [Epstein] goes, a bunch of Los Alamos physicists were retiring … and I wanted to speak with them.” “And then you realized Bill Richardson was kind of in with the Clintons, and he was the Secretary of Energy, and he’s just systematically siphoning American nuclear secrets.” “There’s another email where [Epstein] said, I killed Pons back in the day.” “And he’s talking about Pons and Fleiscann, who were claiming to get cold fusion results.” “What is Epstein dealing with cold fusion?” “Then he’s hanging out at Harvard with the math department.” Lazar: “None of that makes any sense.” “I used to drive by that ranch all the time.” “I lived really close to it when I lived in New Mexico.” “And they always called it the Victoria’s Secret Ranch.” “Everyone knew that as the Victoria’s Secret Ranch.” Michels: “It’s because he was close with Les Wexner, who was the CEO and founder of Victoria’s Secret.” Lazar: “I didn’t know that … ” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

92,959 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten