Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨🇺🇸 The U.S. will reportedly NEVER fund research that could wipe us out again! NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya is calling the new ban on risky gain-of-function research “absolutely vital.” He’s pushing for full transparency, real debate, and a completely DIFFERENT pandemic playbook next time. As in, no more lockdowns,... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,859,573 subscribers

52,805 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The ceremony ended with a powerful moment from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed Director of the NIH. He called it “a historic day,” and warned that gain of function research—the kind that makes viruses more contagious or deadly—has always carried a catastrophic risk. “This research does not protect us against pandemics,” he said. “What it does is there's always a danger that in doing this research, it might leak out just by accident, even, and cause a pandemic.” Bhattacharya stressed that the vast majority of scientific research will continue as normal. But this small slice of high-risk experimentation? That’s no longer just up to scientists. “This executive order puts in place a framework to make sure that the public has a say… that in fact, the public can say, no, don’t take this risk.” For the first time, the door is finally closing on one of the most dangerous scientific practices in modern history.

The ceremony ended with a powerful moment from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed Director of the NIH. He called it “a historic day,” and warned that gain of function research—the kind that makes viruses more contagious or deadly—has always carried a catastrophic risk. “This research does not protect us against pandemics,” he said. “What it does is there's always a danger that in doing this research, it might leak out just by accident, even, and cause a pandemic.” Bhattacharya stressed that the vast majority of scientific research will continue as normal. But this small slice of high-risk experimentation? That’s no longer just up to scientists. “This executive order puts in place a framework to make sure that the public has a say… that in fact, the public can say, no, don’t take this risk.” For the first time, the door is finally closing on one of the most dangerous scientific practices in modern history.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

271,491 views • 1 year ago

NEW: NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya sparks mass walkout from NIH employees after suggesting COVID-19 may have originated from the Wuhan lab — and that NIH helped fund it. "It's possible that the pandemic was caused by research conducted by human beings, and it's also possible that the NIH partly sponsored that research." Dozens of NIH staff stormed out. Bhattacharya replied: “Nice to have free speech. You’re welcome, you guys.” Before COVID hit, the NIH was funding risky gain-of-function work on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute — the same lab the CIA, FBI, and DOE say COVID likely leaked from. After the walkout, Bhattacharya continued: "If it's true that we sponsored research that caused the pandemic — and if you look at polls of the American people, that's what most people believe, and I’ve looked at the scientific evidence and I believe it — [then] what we have to do is make sure that we don’t engage in research that is any risk…to human populations." These NIH employees should all be fired. Video: Emily Kopp

NEW: NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya sparks mass walkout from NIH employees after suggesting COVID-19 may have originated from the Wuhan lab — and that NIH helped fund it. "It's possible that the pandemic was caused by research conducted by human beings, and it's also possible that the NIH partly sponsored that research." Dozens of NIH staff stormed out. Bhattacharya replied: “Nice to have free speech. You’re welcome, you guys.” Before COVID hit, the NIH was funding risky gain-of-function work on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute — the same lab the CIA, FBI, and DOE say COVID likely leaked from. After the walkout, Bhattacharya continued: "If it's true that we sponsored research that caused the pandemic — and if you look at polls of the American people, that's what most people believe, and I’ve looked at the scientific evidence and I believe it — [then] what we have to do is make sure that we don’t engage in research that is any risk…to human populations." These NIH employees should all be fired. Video: Emily Kopp

KanekoaTheGreat

660,947 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya just pledged to support dissident scientists in his Senate confirmation hearing: “Dissent is the very essence of science.” “23% of Americans have not much or no confidence at all … in scientists to act in the public’s best interests.” “I have five concrete goals if confirmed as Director of the NIH.” “First, NIH research should focus on research that solves the American chronic disease crisis.” “Life expectancy flatlined between 2012 and 2019, plummeted during the pandemic, and still has not bounced back.” “The chronic disease crisis is severe, with hundreds of millions of Americans—children and adults—suffering from obesity, heart disease, cancer and more.” “Second, NIH-supported science should be replicable, reproducible, and generalizable.” “Unfortunately, much bought modern biomedical science fails this basic test.” “Third, if confirmed, I will establish a culture of respect for free speech in science and scientific dissent at the NIH.” “Over the last few years, top NIH officials oversaw a culture of cover-up, obfuscation, and a lack of tolerance for ideas that differ from theirs.” “Fourth, the NIH must recommit to its mission to fund the most innovative biomedical research agenda possible to improve American health.” “Fifth, the NIH must embrace, and vigorously regulate, risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic.” “If confirmed, I'll carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to Make America Healthy Again.” Jay Bhattacharya

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya just pledged to support dissident scientists in his Senate confirmation hearing: “Dissent is the very essence of science.” “23% of Americans have not much or no confidence at all … in scientists to act in the public’s best interests.” “I have five concrete goals if confirmed as Director of the NIH.” “First, NIH research should focus on research that solves the American chronic disease crisis.” “Life expectancy flatlined between 2012 and 2019, plummeted during the pandemic, and still has not bounced back.” “The chronic disease crisis is severe, with hundreds of millions of Americans—children and adults—suffering from obesity, heart disease, cancer and more.” “Second, NIH-supported science should be replicable, reproducible, and generalizable.” “Unfortunately, much bought modern biomedical science fails this basic test.” “Third, if confirmed, I will establish a culture of respect for free speech in science and scientific dissent at the NIH.” “Over the last few years, top NIH officials oversaw a culture of cover-up, obfuscation, and a lack of tolerance for ideas that differ from theirs.” “Fourth, the NIH must recommit to its mission to fund the most innovative biomedical research agenda possible to improve American health.” “Fifth, the NIH must embrace, and vigorously regulate, risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic.” “If confirmed, I'll carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to Make America Healthy Again.” Jay Bhattacharya

Holden Culotta

203,693 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says the NIH has failed its mission. “Life expectancy … collapsed during the pandemic.” “15 years of no real life expectancy improvements, and you have tremendous chronic disease problems.” “The NIH has funded research… that has advanced our biological knowledge in genetics, and cancer, and a whole bunch of things—but that has not translated over for the typical American to better health.” “In that sense, it is not achieving its mission.” Jan Jekielek Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD

🚨 Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says the NIH has failed its mission. “Life expectancy … collapsed during the pandemic.” “15 years of no real life expectancy improvements, and you have tremendous chronic disease problems.” “The NIH has funded research… that has advanced our biological knowledge in genetics, and cancer, and a whole bunch of things—but that has not translated over for the typical American to better health.” “In that sense, it is not achieving its mission.” Jan Jekielek Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

18,325 views • 7 months ago

The US Has Been Funding Biological Weapons Development in Violation of the 1972 Bioweapons Convention. That Is Going to Be the Source of the Next Pandemic. We signed the treaty. We ratified it in 1975. We agreed not to develop biological weapons. And yet — 120 labs across 30 countries, weapons-grade pathogen research, gain-of-function work in facilities with no meaningful independent oversight. Trump has had a lot on his plate. But the bio-lab infrastructure that produced COVID is still running. The next pandemic isn't a hypothetical. It's a pipeline. Join the Fight: of The Country Telegraph The Country Telegraph Watch the Full Episode:

The US Has Been Funding Biological Weapons Development in Violation of the 1972 Bioweapons Convention. That Is Going to Be the Source of the Next Pandemic. We signed the treaty. We ratified it in 1975. We agreed not to develop biological weapons. And yet — 120 labs across 30 countries, weapons-grade pathogen research, gain-of-function work in facilities with no meaningful independent oversight. Trump has had a lot on his plate. But the bio-lab infrastructure that produced COVID is still running. The next pandemic isn't a hypothetical. It's a pipeline. Join the Fight: of The Country Telegraph The Country Telegraph Watch the Full Episode:

McCullough Foundation

22,895 views • 2 months ago

When asked why I support Nuremberg 2 trials I explained... "The state, however you define that… The military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina… Created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic. When are we going to have accountability for that? I genuinely don’t understand why government officials are allowed to engage in gain of function research [and then not be held to account for their actions]. [Senator Blumenthal] I’m not putting words in your mouth, I’m just quoting your words. [Toby Rogers] I would like to have accountability for the crimes of the Covid era and I’d like to have accountability for the fact that the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism and they’ve covered it up for 26 years."

When asked why I support Nuremberg 2 trials I explained... "The state, however you define that… The military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina… Created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic. When are we going to have accountability for that? I genuinely don’t understand why government officials are allowed to engage in gain of function research [and then not be held to account for their actions]. [Senator Blumenthal] I’m not putting words in your mouth, I’m just quoting your words. [Toby Rogers] I would like to have accountability for the crimes of the Covid era and I’d like to have accountability for the fact that the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism and they’ve covered it up for 26 years."

Toby Rogers

20,895 views • 1 month ago

Is hantavirus the next COVID-level pandemic? The media sure is hyping it up like it is. And would you look at that, they're already working on a vaccine! I sure hope this isn't a real global threat because "The Science” overplayed its hand during COVID. It’s really hard to trust their guidance when they shut down the world, ruined the lives of our children, and created the foundation of a New World Order with the last pandemic. But at least we don't have even more draconian tech ready to deploy this time, like AI surveillance and car "kill switches." Oh wait...

Is hantavirus the next COVID-level pandemic? The media sure is hyping it up like it is. And would you look at that, they're already working on a vaccine! I sure hope this isn't a real global threat because "The Science” overplayed its hand during COVID. It’s really hard to trust their guidance when they shut down the world, ruined the lives of our children, and created the foundation of a New World Order with the last pandemic. But at least we don't have even more draconian tech ready to deploy this time, like AI surveillance and car "kill switches." Oh wait...

Glenn Beck

164,311 views • 4 months ago

The COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed the U.S. health care system and killed more than a million Americans. When it comes to the outbreak of another pandemic, it's a question of "when," not "if." Fast-tracking vaccines saved millions of lives, but missteps in the government’s response and misinformation online damaged public trust. Six years after COVID-19 changed our lives, is the country prepared to handle another pandemic? "Having baseline levels of societal protection are absolutely critical for any major shock, including a pandemic," Elizabeth Cameron, a professor and senior advisor to the Pandemic Center at Brown University’s School of Public Health, told host William Brangham. "All of those things need to be handled now, before the next major pandemic, and we're really sliding backwards." Cameron, who previously worked on global health security for both the Obama and Biden administrations, said she has concerns about how the next pandemic could start. "We do see an increase in the likelihood that we could have an accidental or a deliberate release of a pandemic," she said. Horizons from PBS News, dives into the science, health, technology and environmental issues making headlines each week. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.

The COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed the U.S. health care system and killed more than a million Americans. When it comes to the outbreak of another pandemic, it's a question of "when," not "if." Fast-tracking vaccines saved millions of lives, but missteps in the government’s response and misinformation online damaged public trust. Six years after COVID-19 changed our lives, is the country prepared to handle another pandemic? "Having baseline levels of societal protection are absolutely critical for any major shock, including a pandemic," Elizabeth Cameron, a professor and senior advisor to the Pandemic Center at Brown University’s School of Public Health, told host William Brangham. "All of those things need to be handled now, before the next major pandemic, and we're really sliding backwards." Cameron, who previously worked on global health security for both the Obama and Biden administrations, said she has concerns about how the next pandemic could start. "We do see an increase in the likelihood that we could have an accidental or a deliberate release of a pandemic," she said. Horizons from PBS News, dives into the science, health, technology and environmental issues making headlines each week. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.

PBS News

11,548 views • 5 months ago

🚨HOLY SH*T!! We know why Fauci requested a preemptive pardon! The biolabs in Ukraine are REAL! Tulsi Gabbard: "We are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on this, as well as Secretary Kennedy is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan Lab, as well as many others." "Many of these other biolabs around the world were actually US-funded and led to this dangerous kind of research that, in many examples, has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis." "It's because this gain-of-function research is happening in biolabs around the world. That by the way is still on the US Embassy Ukraine's website today about how the US has funded these biolabs." "US -unded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia-Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another Covid like pandemic. And for that I was called a Russian asset. You're, you know, trumpeting Putin's talking points." "All of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts. That by the way are still on US Embassy Ukraine's website today about how the US has funded these biolabs in Ukraine"

🚨HOLY SH*T!! We know why Fauci requested a preemptive pardon! The biolabs in Ukraine are REAL! Tulsi Gabbard: "We are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on this, as well as Secretary Kennedy is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan Lab, as well as many others." "Many of these other biolabs around the world were actually US-funded and led to this dangerous kind of research that, in many examples, has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis." "It's because this gain-of-function research is happening in biolabs around the world. That by the way is still on the US Embassy Ukraine's website today about how the US has funded these biolabs." "US -unded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia-Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another Covid like pandemic. And for that I was called a Russian asset. You're, you know, trumpeting Putin's talking points." "All of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts. That by the way are still on US Embassy Ukraine's website today about how the US has funded these biolabs in Ukraine"

Gunther Eagleman™

1,274,087 views • 1 year ago

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

Townhall.com

28,401 views • 1 month ago

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL): “Can we acknowledge this? The same NIH that was investing in other research that SHUT DOWN… basically the entire planet. Can we acknowledge that?” MS NOW’s Molly Jong-Fast: “No!” Byron Donalds: “We don't acknowledge that the NIH is funding gain of function research?” Molly Jong-Fast: “I do not believe the NIH caused COVID.” Byron Donalds: “Then why did [Dr. Anthony] Fauci plead the 114 times?” Bill Maher: “WOOOOO… WAIT A SECOND! We don’t know that. If COVID came from a lab and that lab was in Wuhan, [China], which is coincidentally right where the disease started, of course it could have come from that lab and of course that lab has been linked to gain-of-function research.” Molly Jong-Fast: “If the evidence comes out that the NIH caused COVID, okay, but it hasn’t yet.” Byron Donalds: “I didn’t say the NIH caused it. I said, did they not fund it? Those are two different things.”

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL): “Can we acknowledge this? The same NIH that was investing in other research that SHUT DOWN… basically the entire planet. Can we acknowledge that?” MS NOW’s Molly Jong-Fast: “No!” Byron Donalds: “We don't acknowledge that the NIH is funding gain of function research?” Molly Jong-Fast: “I do not believe the NIH caused COVID.” Byron Donalds: “Then why did [Dr. Anthony] Fauci plead the 114 times?” Bill Maher: “WOOOOO… WAIT A SECOND! We don’t know that. If COVID came from a lab and that lab was in Wuhan, [China], which is coincidentally right where the disease started, of course it could have come from that lab and of course that lab has been linked to gain-of-function research.” Molly Jong-Fast: “If the evidence comes out that the NIH caused COVID, okay, but it hasn’t yet.” Byron Donalds: “I didn’t say the NIH caused it. I said, did they not fund it? Those are two different things.”

RedWave Press

66,220 views • 22 days ago

“Here we are, six years after the coronavirus outbreak, and we still don’t know for sure how it started. Which is kind of important, because if we don’t know how it started, we can’t really know how to prevent the next one. And for a lot of reasons, that issue got completely politicized over the last six years. And this hearing didn’t help in that regard. It’s Kabuki. It’s a show. On both sides, actually… It’s a lot of heat and no light.” “When it comes to Fauci, in any normal situation, you could say, well, if he’s got nothing to hide, he could just talk. But we’re not in a normal environment. We’re in an environment where the Justice Department indicted Comey for an Instagram post on the beach. Fauci has a pardon, it’s not a future pardon. He doesn’t have immunity. If Rand Paul really wanted answers, he could give him immunity, but he didn’t do that. So, knowing that he could be indicted for almost anything in this era, I completely understand why he took the fifth.” “There’s a lot of evidence that Fauci seriously considered the lab leak theory, in private. But he and his friends, in public, always poo-pooed it and talked it down… There’s a ton of U.S. government information that we still have not seen. And that’s the information that led the FBI, the Department of Energy, and more recently the CIA to conclude that there’s a preponderance of evidence, not proof, but more evidence than not that the bat coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was somehow related to the bat coronavirus labs in Wuhan.” “There’s a lot of research that American and Chinese researchers were doing in Wuhan on making bat coronaviruses more dangerous. You can call it Gain of Function or not, it doesn’t matter what you call it… The idea was to figure out how viruses might evolve so that we could prevent them. But if the viruses broke out of the lab, then we actually caused the pandemic, which is a tough thing to wrap your head around.” “This was government-sponsored research by scientists in America and China who were trying to do the right thing. They weren’t trying to start a pandemic. But they may have started a pandemic. And the fact that this is politicized means we can’t get to those answers. But those answers are still there. Something happened in Wuhan. We need to figure out what it was, so we can prevent the next pandemic.” Watch my entire segment about the Rand-Fauci hearing battle with Boris Sanchez on CNN News Central.

“Here we are, six years after the coronavirus outbreak, and we still don’t know for sure how it started. Which is kind of important, because if we don’t know how it started, we can’t really know how to prevent the next one. And for a lot of reasons, that issue got completely politicized over the last six years. And this hearing didn’t help in that regard. It’s Kabuki. It’s a show. On both sides, actually… It’s a lot of heat and no light.” “When it comes to Fauci, in any normal situation, you could say, well, if he’s got nothing to hide, he could just talk. But we’re not in a normal environment. We’re in an environment where the Justice Department indicted Comey for an Instagram post on the beach. Fauci has a pardon, it’s not a future pardon. He doesn’t have immunity. If Rand Paul really wanted answers, he could give him immunity, but he didn’t do that. So, knowing that he could be indicted for almost anything in this era, I completely understand why he took the fifth.” “There’s a lot of evidence that Fauci seriously considered the lab leak theory, in private. But he and his friends, in public, always poo-pooed it and talked it down… There’s a ton of U.S. government information that we still have not seen. And that’s the information that led the FBI, the Department of Energy, and more recently the CIA to conclude that there’s a preponderance of evidence, not proof, but more evidence than not that the bat coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was somehow related to the bat coronavirus labs in Wuhan.” “There’s a lot of research that American and Chinese researchers were doing in Wuhan on making bat coronaviruses more dangerous. You can call it Gain of Function or not, it doesn’t matter what you call it… The idea was to figure out how viruses might evolve so that we could prevent them. But if the viruses broke out of the lab, then we actually caused the pandemic, which is a tough thing to wrap your head around.” “This was government-sponsored research by scientists in America and China who were trying to do the right thing. They weren’t trying to start a pandemic. But they may have started a pandemic. And the fact that this is politicized means we can’t get to those answers. But those answers are still there. Something happened in Wuhan. We need to figure out what it was, so we can prevent the next pandemic.” Watch my entire segment about the Rand-Fauci hearing battle with Boris Sanchez on CNN News Central.

Josh Rogin

63,580 views • 1 month ago