Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of... unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putinshow more

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

117,350 subscribers

291,721 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

☝️ “Any experts, Russian or Western, can confirm: Ukraine cannot operate modern Western long-range systems independently. These systems can only be used with intelligence data from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. They rely on EU or US satellites—essentially, NATO satellites. Next, and perhaps the most important, flight missions for these missile systems can only be carried out by NATO servicemen. Ukrainian personnel are not capable of doing this. Given that, the question is not whether to allow Ukraine to strike Russia with these missiles. The question is whether NATO countries are willing to become direct participants in a military conflict with Russia” - President Putin

☝️ “Any experts, Russian or Western, can confirm: Ukraine cannot operate modern Western long-range systems independently. These systems can only be used with intelligence data from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. They rely on EU or US satellites—essentially, NATO satellites. Next, and perhaps the most important, flight missions for these missile systems can only be carried out by NATO servicemen. Ukrainian personnel are not capable of doing this. Given that, the question is not whether to allow Ukraine to strike Russia with these missiles. The question is whether NATO countries are willing to become direct participants in a military conflict with Russia” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

115,775 views • 1 year ago

‼️🇷🇺🏴‍☠️ President's Response on the Potential Use of NATO Long-Range Weapons Against Russia "This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European nations are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, considering the fundamental shift in the nature of this conflict, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats posed to us," stated Vladimir Putin. - RVvoenkor

‼️🇷🇺🏴‍☠️ President's Response on the Potential Use of NATO Long-Range Weapons Against Russia "This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European nations are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, considering the fundamental shift in the nature of this conflict, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats posed to us," stated Vladimir Putin. - RVvoenkor

Zlatti71

504,794 views • 1 year ago

☝️ "If the decision to permit long-range artillery strikes deep inside Russian territory is taken, it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the USA, and Europe in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, will fundamentally change the nature of the conflict. It will mean that NATO countries are at war with Russia." - President Putin.

☝️ "If the decision to permit long-range artillery strikes deep inside Russian territory is taken, it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the USA, and Europe in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, will fundamentally change the nature of the conflict. It will mean that NATO countries are at war with Russia." - President Putin.

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

1,137,091 views • 1 year ago

Putin : " If the decision to permit long-range artillery strikes deep inside Russian territory is taken, it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the USA, and Europe in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, will fundamentally change the nature of the conflict. It will mean that NATO countries are at war with Russia"

Putin : " If the decision to permit long-range artillery strikes deep inside Russian territory is taken, it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the USA, and Europe in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, will fundamentally change the nature of the conflict. It will mean that NATO countries are at war with Russia"

JOSH DUNLAP

49,498 views • 1 year ago

🚨🌍 “Only NATO troops can operate these missiles - The Ukrainians can’t do it” “To allow Ukraine to use these weapons to strike inside of Russia - we are talking about a decision for NATO to be directly involved in the conflict or not” “That would mean a change in the Conflict - USA NATO countries would be in direct war with Russia” The World was looking to Trump to seek peace, it appears the Deep State have other intentions. Prepare.

🚨🌍 “Only NATO troops can operate these missiles - The Ukrainians can’t do it” “To allow Ukraine to use these weapons to strike inside of Russia - we are talking about a decision for NATO to be directly involved in the conflict or not” “That would mean a change in the Conflict - USA NATO countries would be in direct war with Russia” The World was looking to Trump to seek peace, it appears the Deep State have other intentions. Prepare.

Concerned Citizen

328,242 views • 1 year ago

PM Orbán: Ukraine's EU membership would mean admitting a country that is at war with Russia. And if one member of the EU is at war, the others are inevitably are drawn into that war. Ukraine's EU membership would mean immediate war with Russia, and even if there is peace at the moment, it carries with it the constant risk of war. We are talking about a 1,200-kilometer-long front line, and even if there is peace, there is no way of knowing how long it will last. Therefore, Ukraine's accession poses a direct threat of war to all European countries. Of course, those on the Atlantic coast can calmly ask for a cup of coffee. This does not bother them all that much, because they are far away. But we are here. We have already been on Ukrainian territory that belonged to Russia during the war, and we know the consequences. We know that if the Russians launch an attack from there, we will be the first to suffer, and we want to prevent that at all costs.

PM Orbán: Ukraine's EU membership would mean admitting a country that is at war with Russia. And if one member of the EU is at war, the others are inevitably are drawn into that war. Ukraine's EU membership would mean immediate war with Russia, and even if there is peace at the moment, it carries with it the constant risk of war. We are talking about a 1,200-kilometer-long front line, and even if there is peace, there is no way of knowing how long it will last. Therefore, Ukraine's accession poses a direct threat of war to all European countries. Of course, those on the Atlantic coast can calmly ask for a cup of coffee. This does not bother them all that much, because they are far away. But we are here. We have already been on Ukrainian territory that belonged to Russia during the war, and we know the consequences. We know that if the Russians launch an attack from there, we will be the first to suffer, and we want to prevent that at all costs.

Anton Gerashchenko

52,807 views • 4 months ago

"In Ukraine, European soldiers are operating European weapons to wage war against Russia," says Slovakian Prime Minister Fico. "Another plan for large-scale military financial aid to Ukraine is on the table. You know that the European Union has approved a 90 billion euro loan, which Slovakia is not participating in because the money is going exclusively to support the war. However, next week—and that's why I'm talking about this now, Mr. Editor—we will have a meeting at the level of senior constitutional officials, with the participation of the Minister of Defense, to develop the Slovak Government's position on proposals so that a decision on large-scale annual financial military aid to Ukraine can be made at the NATO summit in Ankara. I'm talking about tens of billions of euros, to be absolutely clear. That is, in addition to these 90 billion euros, it is proposed that tens of billions of euros be sent to Ukraine in military aid so that the war can continue. We probably won't be able to stop other countries. If other countries want to raise money for the war, we can't stop them. But the Slovak Republic is a peaceful country, and that's why I'm talking about this in advance." I will conduct all negotiations so that the delegation traveling to Ankara has no opportunity to involve Slovakia in these military loans. Mr. Editor, you are probably aware that NATO Secretary General Rutte proposed that each NATO member state pay 0.25% of its GDP to support Ukraine. We rejected this. Now another proposal is emerging: let's collect money and provide Ukraine with additional resources. I say this because, in my opinion, it can be stated: today's war against Russia is not just about Ukraine and Russia, because many Western countries are supplying Ukraine with advanced technology, which is controlled on Ukrainian territory, not by Ukrainian soldiers, but by foreign military personnel. We are seeing attacks deep into the territory of the Russian Federation. This is creating enormous international tension.

"In Ukraine, European soldiers are operating European weapons to wage war against Russia," says Slovakian Prime Minister Fico. "Another plan for large-scale military financial aid to Ukraine is on the table. You know that the European Union has approved a 90 billion euro loan, which Slovakia is not participating in because the money is going exclusively to support the war. However, next week—and that's why I'm talking about this now, Mr. Editor—we will have a meeting at the level of senior constitutional officials, with the participation of the Minister of Defense, to develop the Slovak Government's position on proposals so that a decision on large-scale annual financial military aid to Ukraine can be made at the NATO summit in Ankara. I'm talking about tens of billions of euros, to be absolutely clear. That is, in addition to these 90 billion euros, it is proposed that tens of billions of euros be sent to Ukraine in military aid so that the war can continue. We probably won't be able to stop other countries. If other countries want to raise money for the war, we can't stop them. But the Slovak Republic is a peaceful country, and that's why I'm talking about this in advance." I will conduct all negotiations so that the delegation traveling to Ankara has no opportunity to involve Slovakia in these military loans. Mr. Editor, you are probably aware that NATO Secretary General Rutte proposed that each NATO member state pay 0.25% of its GDP to support Ukraine. We rejected this. Now another proposal is emerging: let's collect money and provide Ukraine with additional resources. I say this because, in my opinion, it can be stated: today's war against Russia is not just about Ukraine and Russia, because many Western countries are supplying Ukraine with advanced technology, which is controlled on Ukrainian territory, not by Ukrainian soldiers, but by foreign military personnel. We are seeing attacks deep into the territory of the Russian Federation. This is creating enormous international tension.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

26,488 views • 4 days ago

NEW: 🇷🇺 Russia’s representative to the UN has confirmed Putin words that NATO is on the brink of war with Russia: "If the decision to lift restrictions is made, it will mean a war between NATO countries and Russia"

NEW: 🇷🇺 Russia’s representative to the UN has confirmed Putin words that NATO is on the brink of war with Russia: "If the decision to lift restrictions is made, it will mean a war between NATO countries and Russia"

Megatron

4,414,444 views • 1 year ago

It is expected that Blinken will announce tomorrow that the US has given Ukraine the greenlight to strike deep inside Russia using Western made Storm Shadow missiles. This would mean NATO & the US are at war with Russia. Putin explains their position here

It is expected that Blinken will announce tomorrow that the US has given Ukraine the greenlight to strike deep inside Russia using Western made Storm Shadow missiles. This would mean NATO & the US are at war with Russia. Putin explains their position here

Clint Russell

11,370,826 views • 1 year ago

“NATO will buy weapons for Ukraine from the USA” – Trump. “The President said he is disappointed in Russia and told us that, in his opinion, he will make an important statement about Russia on Monday. However, when asked to clarify, he did not say what the statement would be. The President also said that today he made a deal with NATO under which the USA will send weapons to Ukraine through NATO. And NATO, quote, ‘is paying for this weaponry 100 percent,’ including the Patriot missile defense systems Ukraine had requested, and NATO will handle their distribution.”

“NATO will buy weapons for Ukraine from the USA” – Trump. “The President said he is disappointed in Russia and told us that, in his opinion, he will make an important statement about Russia on Monday. However, when asked to clarify, he did not say what the statement would be. The President also said that today he made a deal with NATO under which the USA will send weapons to Ukraine through NATO. And NATO, quote, ‘is paying for this weaponry 100 percent,’ including the Patriot missile defense systems Ukraine had requested, and NATO will handle their distribution.”

Zlatti71

25,032 views • 11 months ago

President Zelenskyy: Ukraine chooses NATO, not nuclear weapons. Ukraine chooses the NATO direction. This is a common and long-suffered choice of the Ukrainian people. It is a consequence of Russia's war against Ukraine, especially its full-scale part. NATO is a priority. Does anything depend on Ukraine at this stage? Actually, no. Ukraine already did all she could do. Now this is the question of a political decision by our partners and allies. Several media ( and websites are spreading rumors that Ukraine can create its own nuclear weapons within a short time-frame, alleging that this is a second option for a desperate Ukraine if we are not accepted into NATO. Obviously, this is a worst-case scenario - it is awful to even think about a Ukraine that desperate. Thus, inviting Ukraine to join NATO at this point is the most pragmatical solution. Another option are security guarantees that would be equally effective to joining NATO. The whole world is watching the situation in and around Ukraine and our security - we gave up our nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees. As a result, Russia continues destroying our country, and Ukraine gets more restrictions and bans. What will the small non-nuclear countries think about this case? Which alliances and partnerships will they consider? What spheres of influence and security will they decide to become a part of? And will they think about their own nuclear weapons? Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers are also looking at today's situation. They have several years of true combat experience. But now they feel betrayed and destined to fight for many more years. Now is the time to ask the fundamental question: what will happen if Ukraine stops being the barter chip and the gates that hold the flood? A turning point is approaching. Russia is vulnerable. Victory over Russia is the most pragmatic solution and a necessity for survival, not just for Ukraine but for the Western democracy as well. If that doesn't happen, the world will face challenges we cannot even predict. It is time to fully realize that the largest nuclear country in the world is ready for the largest war against "the West". And it has already started it.

President Zelenskyy: Ukraine chooses NATO, not nuclear weapons. Ukraine chooses the NATO direction. This is a common and long-suffered choice of the Ukrainian people. It is a consequence of Russia's war against Ukraine, especially its full-scale part. NATO is a priority. Does anything depend on Ukraine at this stage? Actually, no. Ukraine already did all she could do. Now this is the question of a political decision by our partners and allies. Several media ( and websites are spreading rumors that Ukraine can create its own nuclear weapons within a short time-frame, alleging that this is a second option for a desperate Ukraine if we are not accepted into NATO. Obviously, this is a worst-case scenario - it is awful to even think about a Ukraine that desperate. Thus, inviting Ukraine to join NATO at this point is the most pragmatical solution. Another option are security guarantees that would be equally effective to joining NATO. The whole world is watching the situation in and around Ukraine and our security - we gave up our nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees. As a result, Russia continues destroying our country, and Ukraine gets more restrictions and bans. What will the small non-nuclear countries think about this case? Which alliances and partnerships will they consider? What spheres of influence and security will they decide to become a part of? And will they think about their own nuclear weapons? Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers are also looking at today's situation. They have several years of true combat experience. But now they feel betrayed and destined to fight for many more years. Now is the time to ask the fundamental question: what will happen if Ukraine stops being the barter chip and the gates that hold the flood? A turning point is approaching. Russia is vulnerable. Victory over Russia is the most pragmatic solution and a necessity for survival, not just for Ukraine but for the Western democracy as well. If that doesn't happen, the world will face challenges we cannot even predict. It is time to fully realize that the largest nuclear country in the world is ready for the largest war against "the West". And it has already started it.

Anton Gerashchenko

947,208 views • 1 year ago

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

47,775 views • 4 months ago

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

27,487 views • 4 months ago

The Biggest Threat in the World is NATO NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS NATO Has Been Encircling Russia Since the Nineties The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War Ukraine Was Becoming a de FACTO Member of NATO Putin said, quote, "We are categorically opposed to Ukraine joining NATO because this poses a threat to us, and we have arguments to support hall." He then made it clear that he recognized that Ukraine was becoming a de FACTO member of NATO. The United States and its allies, he said, quote, "Continue to pump the current Kiev authorities full of modern types of weapons." End of quote. He went on to say that if this was not stopped, Moscow, quote, "Would be left with an anti-Russia armed-to-the-teeth. This is totally unacceptable." Putin's logic should be manifestly clear to Americans in the audience who have long understood, I'm sure, that we have a Monroe Doctrine, which stipulates that no great power is allowed to place any of its military forces in the Western hemisphere.

The Biggest Threat in the World is NATO NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS NATO Has Been Encircling Russia Since the Nineties The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War Ukraine Was Becoming a de FACTO Member of NATO Putin said, quote, "We are categorically opposed to Ukraine joining NATO because this poses a threat to us, and we have arguments to support hall." He then made it clear that he recognized that Ukraine was becoming a de FACTO member of NATO. The United States and its allies, he said, quote, "Continue to pump the current Kiev authorities full of modern types of weapons." End of quote. He went on to say that if this was not stopped, Moscow, quote, "Would be left with an anti-Russia armed-to-the-teeth. This is totally unacceptable." Putin's logic should be manifestly clear to Americans in the audience who have long understood, I'm sure, that we have a Monroe Doctrine, which stipulates that no great power is allowed to place any of its military forces in the Western hemisphere.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

38,092 views • 9 months ago

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 views • 2 years ago

The military power Luxembourg has something to say: 'Ukraine needs weapons. And we will buy them from the Americans,' said Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden. 'Right now, Ukraine needs weapons. They are hard to find, and of course, Ukrainians do not have them. They cannot fully finance them on their own. Therefore, a collective approach is needed. That is why the Minister of Defense and I informed the NATO Secretary General this morning that Luxembourg will participate in the initiative recently launched at the initiative of the NATO Secretary General, called PUL — Prioritized Ukrainian Requirement List. Simply put, this means that together with other countries, which still need to be identified, we will finance a package of already available weapons, largely American, which we will provide to Ukraine. In the coming weeks, we will of course identify other countries ready to do this with us. Usually, such packages amount to about 500 million euros. Today we agreed that Luxembourg will participate in this.' - SK

The military power Luxembourg has something to say: 'Ukraine needs weapons. And we will buy them from the Americans,' said Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden. 'Right now, Ukraine needs weapons. They are hard to find, and of course, Ukrainians do not have them. They cannot fully finance them on their own. Therefore, a collective approach is needed. That is why the Minister of Defense and I informed the NATO Secretary General this morning that Luxembourg will participate in the initiative recently launched at the initiative of the NATO Secretary General, called PUL — Prioritized Ukrainian Requirement List. Simply put, this means that together with other countries, which still need to be identified, we will finance a package of already available weapons, largely American, which we will provide to Ukraine. In the coming weeks, we will of course identify other countries ready to do this with us. Usually, such packages amount to about 500 million euros. Today we agreed that Luxembourg will participate in this.' - SK

Zlatti71

57,554 views • 10 months ago

Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever. 🚨 The War Waged by NEOCONS Via Ukraine Was Designed to Bring Down Russia The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed. NATO DISBAND !!! Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever. 🚨 The War Waged by NEOCONS Via Ukraine Was Designed to Bring Down Russia The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed. NATO DISBAND !!! Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

49,223 views • 4 months ago

Russia and the Trump administration are lying about the war in Ukraine. Their latest recycled claim is that 'NATO provoked the war in Ukraine.' This silly narrative is usually spread by Russians, but recently they were joined in by the richest man in the world, Elon Musk. This claim stems from a statement made by American Secretary of State James A. Baker to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990, suggesting that NATO would move "not one inch eastward" if Russia accepted Germany's unification. However, this assurance was only about Germany and was not formalized in any binding agreement. Even Gorbachev himself said that this promise was never made. Unlike the Budapest Memorandum from 1994, where Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from the US, the UK, and Russia - guarantees that Russia blatantly violated by invading Ukraine in 2014. NATO isn’t some evil empire forcing countries to join. Nations like Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania chose to join NATO - because history showed them what happens when they don’t have protection. Russia wasn’t ‘provoked’ - these countries were just protecting themselves from Russian imperialism. And if anything, Russia’s the one driving countries toward NATO. Their invasion in Ukraine made Finland and Sweden ditch neutrality and run straight to NATO. Again, who invaded who? And which NATO countries have been invaded by Russia? Today, top US officials are spreading this exact lie about NATO provoking Russia. Elon Musk is now completely fixated on the US leaving NATO, pushing old falsehoods that were debunked long ago. He'll probably post around 300 times about this topic in the next week or so. And these same lies may soon be echoed by President Trump. And speaking of verbal statements, here’s Putin himself, in a 2008 interview, saying that Crimea is Ukraine.

Russia and the Trump administration are lying about the war in Ukraine. Their latest recycled claim is that 'NATO provoked the war in Ukraine.' This silly narrative is usually spread by Russians, but recently they were joined in by the richest man in the world, Elon Musk. This claim stems from a statement made by American Secretary of State James A. Baker to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990, suggesting that NATO would move "not one inch eastward" if Russia accepted Germany's unification. However, this assurance was only about Germany and was not formalized in any binding agreement. Even Gorbachev himself said that this promise was never made. Unlike the Budapest Memorandum from 1994, where Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from the US, the UK, and Russia - guarantees that Russia blatantly violated by invading Ukraine in 2014. NATO isn’t some evil empire forcing countries to join. Nations like Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania chose to join NATO - because history showed them what happens when they don’t have protection. Russia wasn’t ‘provoked’ - these countries were just protecting themselves from Russian imperialism. And if anything, Russia’s the one driving countries toward NATO. Their invasion in Ukraine made Finland and Sweden ditch neutrality and run straight to NATO. Again, who invaded who? And which NATO countries have been invaded by Russia? Today, top US officials are spreading this exact lie about NATO provoking Russia. Elon Musk is now completely fixated on the US leaving NATO, pushing old falsehoods that were debunked long ago. He'll probably post around 300 times about this topic in the next week or so. And these same lies may soon be echoed by President Trump. And speaking of verbal statements, here’s Putin himself, in a 2008 interview, saying that Crimea is Ukraine.

Vatnik Soup

258,755 views • 1 year ago