Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The very well read Frank Wright explaining the state duty to prevent civil unrest… It sounds so common sense that it makes you wonder how the government doesn’t understand it. Then you remember that the state prioritises other interests than those which would benefit the British people. It suits... show more

Restore Tyneside

3,975 subscribers

22,403 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

First the state demands that you fulfill your duty to it, and then the state throws you into the trash...

First the state demands that you fulfill your duty to it, and then the state throws you into the trash...

𝓽𝓱𝓸𝓾𝓰𝓱𝓽𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 👁️

23,165 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

German MEP Christine Anderson argues that the purpose of open borders is to destabilise society to the point of civil unrest, allowing governments to impose increasingly authoritarian controls under the guise of restoring order. "Diversifying a society... is a guarantee to have civil unrest." "And to fix that problem, you tell the people, well, we need a stronger state." "We need stronger policing... so we can keep the peace."

German MEP Christine Anderson argues that the purpose of open borders is to destabilise society to the point of civil unrest, allowing governments to impose increasingly authoritarian controls under the guise of restoring order. "Diversifying a society... is a guarantee to have civil unrest." "And to fix that problem, you tell the people, well, we need a stronger state." "We need stronger policing... so we can keep the peace."

Wide Awake Media

29,081 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

"The worst kind of bioweapon wouldn't kill a lot of people, it would disable a lot of people and kill people slowly over time. You wouldn't want it to just start killing, because if that were to happen you would very quickly identify those people who had been exposed and who were dying and who were at risk of spreading it and you would create an extremely strict lockdown to keep them in place and not let them spread it to the rest of the population, whereas with a very slow death blow that takes years to play out and also disables a lot of people, that can destroy an economy and kill people over the long run, so it might take a couple of years, 5 years, 10 years it might take more."

"The worst kind of bioweapon wouldn't kill a lot of people, it would disable a lot of people and kill people slowly over time. You wouldn't want it to just start killing, because if that were to happen you would very quickly identify those people who had been exposed and who were dying and who were at risk of spreading it and you would create an extremely strict lockdown to keep them in place and not let them spread it to the rest of the population, whereas with a very slow death blow that takes years to play out and also disables a lot of people, that can destroy an economy and kill people over the long run, so it might take a couple of years, 5 years, 10 years it might take more."

Dr. Syed Haider:

66,491 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Manipur issue, Congress MP Angomcha Bimol Akoijam says, "Today, I thought that I'll speak not to the govt of India but to the rest of the people...The beginning of the arm (armed conflict) was the first signal, then the looting and so on happened. Then you see that there was a lull after the first few days of May... Then you see Assam Rifles confronting with Manipur police. You see two retired officials of two security organisations speaking against and opposite almost fitting into a narrative of Meiteis versus Kukis... Article 21 gives us that right to life. None of the people in the state, whether Kukis or Meiteis, the state has not been able to provide it. Isn't it all the fundamental right in our constitution?.. In our Constitution, all the rights which are guaranteed are an obligation of the state. The state must defend all those rights. The state has not done that..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Manipur issue, Congress MP Angomcha Bimol Akoijam says, "Today, I thought that I'll speak not to the govt of India but to the rest of the people...The beginning of the arm (armed conflict) was the first signal, then the looting and so on happened. Then you see that there was a lull after the first few days of May... Then you see Assam Rifles confronting with Manipur police. You see two retired officials of two security organisations speaking against and opposite almost fitting into a narrative of Meiteis versus Kukis... Article 21 gives us that right to life. None of the people in the state, whether Kukis or Meiteis, the state has not been able to provide it. Isn't it all the fundamental right in our constitution?.. In our Constitution, all the rights which are guaranteed are an obligation of the state. The state must defend all those rights. The state has not done that..."

ANI

57,247 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 THE FULL BANNED TOMMY ROBINSON INTERVIEW This is my entire conversation with Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 on the escalating civil unrest in England that the British PM blamed on him. We can't share it on most platforms, so X, you know what to do. Full story:

🚨 THE FULL BANNED TOMMY ROBINSON INTERVIEW This is my entire conversation with Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 on the escalating civil unrest in England that the British PM blamed on him. We can't share it on most platforms, so X, you know what to do. Full story:

Avi Yemini

957,365 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A myopic analysis. The state pension was contributory (see clip), and very gradually and quietly, over time, that situation changed. Adair Turner’s 2002 tome even refers to the state pension as “an entitlement”. The people were actively told that if you built up a NIC record, you will get the appropriate state pension, but the people were not told that changed, because the change was quietly buried over time within acts of parliament and not referred to. Did government not learn from WASPI? At least when women had their state pension age changed, it was widely promulgated. This though, changed because the government wanted you to think that in the future that your state pension would be a privilege, and not an entitlement. Because then of course, the state can tell you that you don’t get one, and it then has a tighter hold over you. The state did not tell you when it slowly started to change it from being a contributory scheme to a non-contributory scheme, because it wanted the best of both worlds. It knew, when it started to change things, but all hell would break loose if people realised the state pension was going to be something to be a carrot and stick, and not an entitlement.

A myopic analysis. The state pension was contributory (see clip), and very gradually and quietly, over time, that situation changed. Adair Turner’s 2002 tome even refers to the state pension as “an entitlement”. The people were actively told that if you built up a NIC record, you will get the appropriate state pension, but the people were not told that changed, because the change was quietly buried over time within acts of parliament and not referred to. Did government not learn from WASPI? At least when women had their state pension age changed, it was widely promulgated. This though, changed because the government wanted you to think that in the future that your state pension would be a privilege, and not an entitlement. Because then of course, the state can tell you that you don’t get one, and it then has a tighter hold over you. The state did not tell you when it slowly started to change it from being a contributory scheme to a non-contributory scheme, because it wanted the best of both worlds. It knew, when it started to change things, but all hell would break loose if people realised the state pension was going to be something to be a carrot and stick, and not an entitlement.

Rush

21,263 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 A man warns that freezing food stamps in Minnesota could trigger civil unrest. "At this point, could you call this a civil war? The sanctioning of an enemy state is essentially a declaration of war at this point. Cutting off food to the people."

🚨 A man warns that freezing food stamps in Minnesota could trigger civil unrest. "At this point, could you call this a civil war? The sanctioning of an enemy state is essentially a declaration of war at this point. Cutting off food to the people."

Derrick Evans

23,828 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The character of the British people is unique. It is that which has shaped our institutions. It is that which has made them so valuable. It is that which makes us stand up for liberty more fiercely than any other country in Europe. And we must never submit that character to any other nation. [...] Whatever happened to the British Lion—of whom Winston said it was a privilege to give the roar?

The character of the British people is unique. It is that which has shaped our institutions. It is that which has made them so valuable. It is that which makes us stand up for liberty more fiercely than any other country in Europe. And we must never submit that character to any other nation. [...] Whatever happened to the British Lion—of whom Winston said it was a privilege to give the roar?

Margaret Thatcher

23,382 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"The more it develops, the more unrest we’re going to see… I would go as far as to predict not just civil unrest but civil war in the UK, in the coming years… I would hate to be right on this, but I believe I know that there is no political solution.” I spoke to former Colonel Richard Kemp about the main threats facing the West from within, why our politicians appear incapable of or unwilling to address them, and whether ignoring problems caused by immigration and Islam will bring Britain to the brink of civil war. Richard had not heard of Professor David Betz’s predictions before we spoke, which makes his well-informed warnings all the more alarming.

"The more it develops, the more unrest we’re going to see… I would go as far as to predict not just civil unrest but civil war in the UK, in the coming years… I would hate to be right on this, but I believe I know that there is no political solution.” I spoke to former Colonel Richard Kemp about the main threats facing the West from within, why our politicians appear incapable of or unwilling to address them, and whether ignoring problems caused by immigration and Islam will bring Britain to the brink of civil war. Richard had not heard of Professor David Betz’s predictions before we spoke, which makes his well-informed warnings all the more alarming.

Connor Tomlinson

93,401 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THIS IS THE PLAN: The Democrat Deep State Is Setting Up A Civil War Scenario Where Trump Will Appear As Hitler 2.0 When He Reacts To Their Lawless Chaos! The President Must Address The Nation Before The EBT / SNAP Benefits Run Out On Saturday, Triggering Civil Unrest! "You've Got The Trump Officials In Bunkers, What Do You Think They Know? It Ain't About Nuclear War- That's 10% Of It- It's Civil War, Sweethearts!"

THIS IS THE PLAN: The Democrat Deep State Is Setting Up A Civil War Scenario Where Trump Will Appear As Hitler 2.0 When He Reacts To Their Lawless Chaos! The President Must Address The Nation Before The EBT / SNAP Benefits Run Out On Saturday, Triggering Civil Unrest! "You've Got The Trump Officials In Bunkers, What Do You Think They Know? It Ain't About Nuclear War- That's 10% Of It- It's Civil War, Sweethearts!"

Alex Jones

293,008 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨🇬🇧 “He’s got Special Needs - what you doing?” New footage of British Police arresting two young Children - one has special needs, the other ADHD. Am convinced the UK Government, Legacy Media & The Police are deliberately trying to antagonise the entire British Public into mass civil unrest.

🚨🇬🇧 “He’s got Special Needs - what you doing?” New footage of British Police arresting two young Children - one has special needs, the other ADHD. Am convinced the UK Government, Legacy Media & The Police are deliberately trying to antagonise the entire British Public into mass civil unrest.

Concerned Citizen

383,995 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

There’s a common belief among Russians that the authorities understand the Russian economy is plunging into the abyss and that it would be easier to let it collapse than to try to fix it, says blogger Pavel Ivanov. Vladimir Boglaev, general director of the Cherepovets Foundry and Mechanical Plant and an economist, confirms the grim state of affairs in Russia.

There’s a common belief among Russians that the authorities understand the Russian economy is plunging into the abyss and that it would be easier to let it collapse than to try to fix it, says blogger Pavel Ivanov. Vladimir Boglaev, general director of the Cherepovets Foundry and Mechanical Plant and an economist, confirms the grim state of affairs in Russia.

Natalka

15,442 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

French President Macron said that France could recognize Palestine in June. Which Palestine? What do those speaking about the two-state solution mean? Don't you get it? Don't you understand what happened on October 7th? Ham@s was the tool to kickstart an attack on the West's agent in the Middle East, after which the world was invited to tag along, and in the name of Free Palestine, it was invited to join an attack on Western democracies, where protesters are behaving like mobsters, intimidating people and the police. It is an attack against the system, against order. It is an invitation for anarchy. Many think that knowledge is power. What we are seeing and living in the West tells us that vi0lence is power. Is this the world you want to raise your children in? Offering a state to the Palestinians after October 7th would be rewarding them for terr0r. It would echo Ham@s' message: Vi0lence is power. And I would rather live in a world governed by the rule of law, by knowledge, civility, and order. And I will finish by saying that the British mandate of Palestine consisted of today's Israel, Gaza, the West Bank, and the East Bank. More than 70% of the land was already given to the Arabs. They chose to call it Jordan. They could've called it Palestine, but they did not. And as we cannot undo history, shall we move on?

French President Macron said that France could recognize Palestine in June. Which Palestine? What do those speaking about the two-state solution mean? Don't you get it? Don't you understand what happened on October 7th? Ham@s was the tool to kickstart an attack on the West's agent in the Middle East, after which the world was invited to tag along, and in the name of Free Palestine, it was invited to join an attack on Western democracies, where protesters are behaving like mobsters, intimidating people and the police. It is an attack against the system, against order. It is an invitation for anarchy. Many think that knowledge is power. What we are seeing and living in the West tells us that vi0lence is power. Is this the world you want to raise your children in? Offering a state to the Palestinians after October 7th would be rewarding them for terr0r. It would echo Ham@s' message: Vi0lence is power. And I would rather live in a world governed by the rule of law, by knowledge, civility, and order. And I will finish by saying that the British mandate of Palestine consisted of today's Israel, Gaza, the West Bank, and the East Bank. More than 70% of the land was already given to the Arabs. They chose to call it Jordan. They could've called it Palestine, but they did not. And as we cannot undo history, shall we move on?

Rawan Osman روان عثمان

16,942 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Buckley Carlson: “I actually think we do have remedies for an out-of-control megalomaniacal, you know, destructive president… Honest people who have that power should consider taking it. The 25th Amendment is there for a reason.” “It's not crazy to talk about it in this context. If our country is suffering great and lasting damage, which it seems to be, then sober minds need to come in and exercise what power they have for the benefit of all of us.” Tucker Carlson: “I think saying the truth, whatever you think that it is—is the first step towards redemption of yourself and of your country.”

Buckley Carlson: “I actually think we do have remedies for an out-of-control megalomaniacal, you know, destructive president… Honest people who have that power should consider taking it. The 25th Amendment is there for a reason.” “It's not crazy to talk about it in this context. If our country is suffering great and lasting damage, which it seems to be, then sober minds need to come in and exercise what power they have for the benefit of all of us.” Tucker Carlson: “I think saying the truth, whatever you think that it is—is the first step towards redemption of yourself and of your country.”

RedWave Press

106,792 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

One of John McAfee's final messages to the world: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."

One of John McAfee's final messages to the world: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."

Red Pill Dispenser

516,470 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr