Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The WONDERfools release date was leaked. The reason Netflix gatekeeps exact dates is to build maximum momentum. They want the official announcement to be a massive "moment" that hits everyone at once. When things leak, that hype gets fragmented. It turns a potential viral explosion into a slow drip...

24,078 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

You know, the only reason they created that IG account was… For us. It was never about fame or money. It was their way of reaching out when everything around them was falling apart. A place where they tried to share small moments of happiness, excitement, love, and peace with us, even when they barely had any left for themselves. They made it because they were worried. Because they knew we were worried. Because they didn’t want the people who cared about them to sit there wondering if they were okay. And honestly, it was during that time that we saw them in a way we never had before. Real, unfiltered, not dressed up by a company, not edited, not scripted. Just them. That little page carried so much, didn’t it? They taught us so many things without ever needing to put on a show. Through every live and every small update, they showed us what real courage looks like, what honesty feels like, and how powerful someone can be even when everything around them is pushing back. But it was also a place that held their fear, their stress, their sleepless nights, and the weight of knowing the whole world was watching and anything they said could be twisted in an instant. It was a happy place. But never an easy one. We went through so much during that period. From the excitement of seeing them as NJZ to the shock of their injunction being enforced. So many times we thought we saw the light at the end of the tunnel, only for it to turn out to be a fire blocking the path. From excitement to anger, hope to hopelessness, joy to despair, ADHD to depression… everything, all at once. Calling it a roller coaster is an understatement. A lot changed after that. Too much, maybe. But some things never do. And after everything, it doesn’t really matter what comes next anymore. As long as they get to be truly happy, truly safe, and truly loved as human beings who deserved that from the very beginning, that’s enough for us. As long as it’s still Minji, Hanni, Danielle, Haerin, Hyein. That’s all that matters in the end. 🍀 #NewJeans #Jeanzforfree #NJZ #MhDHH_Friends

𝙡𝙤𝙗𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧🦞

70,876 views • 8 months ago

John Carpenter on how the studio, audience and critics reacted after watching "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) & the reason for movie's failure: "Carpenter: I thought about writing a book about my experiences in Hollywood being a director, mainly because I was burned out on making movies. But | didn't do it because | thought, “I’m not ready yet. | don't have enough to say yet. I need to make more films and | don’t want to quit yet.” Interviewer: How did Fox executives react when they saw the movie for the first time? Carpenter: Needless to say, they had a few problems with the movie. They sat down with me and we went through the film. They didn’t like that the white hero was such a buffoon, and that he was being shown up by the Asians. They were afraid the audience wouldn't think this guy was brave, so they asked me to cut out the humor and emphasize his bravery, which was impossible to do. Then we got to the preview stage. The audience that saw it really loved it and laughed, so they wanted me to put the humor back in and go back to what it was—they still hated the movie, though. They didn't want Kurt to play it plenty. They wanted him to be an action hero, a real live action hero, not Jack Burton. They wanted him to be more like Rambo or Stallone. They wanted him to play it straight and it wasn't straight. Interviewer: How was the movie perceived by the audience and the critics? Carpenter: Nobody got it. Like I said earlier, timing was never my thing in terms of when my movies come out. This movie was completely and totally misunderstood. The critics and the public thought it was just bad, and there is nothing | can do about that." ("John Carpenter - The Prince of Darkness", Gilles Boulenger, 2001) P.S: On this day, 40 years ago, "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) was released in the USA.

DepressedBergman

102,002 views • 1 month ago

🚨Peter Schiff: China🇨🇳 is silently dumping the dollar, a US🇺🇸 dollar crisis is coming soon! ‘China is gradually weaning themselves off of the dollar. That’s why, if you look at their holdings of US Treasuries, they’ve actually gone down a bit over the years. If you look at all the new Treasuries we’ve issued over the years, the fact that the Chinese haven’t bought any of them is a big deal because they used to be a main buyer of these assets. Instead of buying more Treasuries, they’ve bought more gold. So if you look at US dollar debt as a percentage of all the reserves the Chinese own, Treasuries are a much smaller percentage of their total reserves than they once were, especially if you consider the appreciation of gold. I would guess the reason they’re not moving more dramatically is because they probably don’t want to cause a crash, the dollar to implode, the Treasury market to implode, because they are trying to sell and want to get a decent price. So I think they’re happy to slowly bleed it off to try to get that good price. They just have to worry about the impact on the dollar, because if they try to dump too many dollars at once, the dollar could go down, and especially if a lot of other countries see that and want to get out. There could be a run on the dollar. If all the holders decide they want to get out, they don’t want to be the last one holding the dollar, and so it becomes a rush, and we could be in a US dollar crisis relatively soon anyway… I think we’re heading for a real crisis in the US, and I think countries that are smart would be trying to get ahead of that by selling whatever they can, as quietly as they can, out of US dollars and any US dollar-denominated debt.’ -Peter Schiff on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

107,856 views • 6 months ago

jihoon said there originally wasnt a Korea stop for their fan concert. it was supposed to be a full japan tour but him and the members thought they have to do a concert in korea first so they had junkyu and asahi propose it to the company.. 🐶 about Hwajeong Gymnasium.. I know a lot of you felt the venue was a bit too small, and honestly, I felt the same way. 🐶 the reason we didn’t say anything before the concert was because the fan concert was originally planned and decided by YG Japan. at first, we were only given the list of Japanese venues. 🐶 when we [treasure] saw that we said “wait aren’t we doing one in Korea? I think we should have one in Korea too.” 🐶 so they had to quickly find and book a venue in Korea. the problem is that it’s actually really difficult to book concert venues in Korea, especially on short notice. 🐶 bc everything happened so suddenly, there were only a few venue options available. among those options, we felt that it would still be better to hold a concert in Korea first rather than not do one at all, so that was the direction we decided to take. 🐶 at the time, Junkyu and Asahi were the leaders for that project. I told Junkyu, “we have to do one in Korea before we go.” Junkyu agreed. I brought it up with the members. they all agreed too. 🐶 then Junkyu and Asahi passed it along to the company and worked things out with them, and that’s how we ended up holding the concert at Hwajeong Gymnasium. 🐶 there really wasn’t any special reason beyond that. it was simply because the planning had started with the Japan branch first, so that’s how things naturally unfolded. 🐶 the headquarters, Japan branch, and us (TREASURE members) all have our own situations and things we have to consider. so rather than saying one side was right or taking anyone’s side, everyone was simply trying to do what was possible under the circumstances. but if we had explained all of this before the concert, I felt like it would’ve made people upset. 🐶 tbh I think anyone would’ve been disappointed. it doesn’t matter whether you’re a Korean Teume, a Japanese Teume, or somewhere else. anyone could’ve felt hurt over something like this. 🐶 we were already very aware of the feedback from fans. we knew exactly how everyone was feeling. so I kept wondering, “when should I talk about this? when’s the right time?” I just didn’t want there to be any unnecessary misunderstandings between anyone. 🐶 thats why I decided it would be better to explain everything carefully after the concerts were over. and during those three concert days, we wanted to give it everything we had. we felt that was both the respectful thing to do for the fans who came to see us and the best thing we could do as artists. 🐶 everyone also supported us so much throughout the concerts, and thankfully, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday all ended on a really good note.

shan

406,594 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Bret Weinstein and Jeffrey Tucker expose the agenda to demonize Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine: “Every trick in the book was played.” “The idea is: you have to keep the population panicked.” “Hydroxychloroquine was taken off the map with a diabolical study in which people were wildly overdosed, and people died.” “It was made to look dangerous when it wasn't.” “You can't do that with Ivermectin because it's not toxic enough.” “It's almost impossible to give somebody enough to kill them.” “So they did other things.” “They ran studies in which they wildly underdosed.” “But the real question is, why would they bother if it's really useless?” “And I'm afraid that the answer has to be [that] if you allow people to use Ivermectin, they will discover how effective it is.” “Like hydroxychloroquine, it is generally useful against RNA viruses.” “At that point, when you introduce the vaccine, nobody will want it because there's a safe alternative.” “Why would I take something that turns out to be a gene therapy?” “There's an off-the-shelf drug that does it and costs nothing.” Tucker: “[There was] a phrase in there that drove Fauci and others crazy.” “Which was that we can get through this with natural immunity through exposure and recovery.” “That document came out about 3 weeks before the vaccine rollout.” “That was the reason they had to eliminate every possible alternative apart from injection as a solution.” Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute Bret Weinstein

Children’s Health Defense

188,855 views • 4 months ago

Nikhil Kamath asked Elon Musk if kids should still go to college. The answer redefined the question. Musk: “AI and robotics is a supersonic tsunami. This is really going to be the most radical change that we’ve ever seen.” He’s not speculating. He’s the one building it. Then he talked about his own sons. Musk: “They agree that AI will probably make their skills unnecessary in the future, but they still want to go to college.” The man building the wave that swallows every career path raised sons who still want to walk one. That’s not a contradiction. That’s the revelation. For thousands of years, humans couldn’t separate learning from survival. You went to school because the world would punish you if you didn’t. Trade your youth for a skill set. Pray the market still values it when you’re done. Education was never a choice. It was a transaction. A bridge you crossed because the other side was survival. Musk’s sons are the first generation that gets to answer the question honestly. Why go when the machine will outperform you in every skill that can be measured? Musk just revealed where the bridge leads. A shoreline that’ll be underwater by the time they graduate. And his sons still want to cross it. They aren’t going to learn how to build the world. They’re going to remember what it feels like to inhabit one. Because education was never really about utility. It was always about formation. We just couldn’t afford to see it until the obligation was stripped away. Every generation before this had to pretend the classroom was about the career. Musk’s sons don’t have to pretend anymore. And what they’re choosing freely is the room itself. The presence of other minds. The friction of not knowing. The slow work of becoming someone you weren’t when you walked in. Musk built the tsunami. He knows exactly what it erases. But his sons just answered the only question that survives it. What do humans do when they no longer have to be useful? They choose each other. And that was always the answer.

Dustin

15,615 views • 2 months ago

David Friedberg: OpenAI’s rise is the best thing that ever happened to Google “No greater blessing has ever happened to Alphabet than OpenAI's rise.” “Not only did it create the foil for Google in the monopoly sense, but it also took the attention away from Google, focused it on OpenAI, and that attention fundamentally damaged OpenAI's strategic product capabilities because they had to start to be so much more careful about what they said and how they said it.” “And the opposite was happening at Google at the same time, which is Larry, Sergey and Sundar being given permission by the board to take risks, to go hard, to figure this out. And boom! It's amazing how the horse race has changed.” “The reason Google didn't lean into AI for years, even though they had the technology, is because they were nervous about cannibalization to search, they were nervous about the quality of the product, they didn't want to release things too early, and then they changed their posture.” “Which, by the way, I would argue is the opposite at OpenAI in the last couple months.” “I used to use advanced voice on ChatGPT all the time. I cannot stand it anymore. I do not use it.” “It has basically hedged away all of the value because it tries to be polite, it tries to make sure that it's giving you warnings all the time.” “It doesn't want to give you data because it's scared that it might give you the wrong data.” “OpenAI has been acting like an incumbent fearful of losing market share and fearful of getting attacked in the media and attacked by consumers for saying the wrong thing.” “And so they've taken this kind of defensive posture that I think has fundamentally damaged the product and the brand.”

The All-In Podcast

108,007 views • 8 months ago