Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇨🇳🇺🇸 The world is asking China a question it has avoided answering for decades: "When the United States begins to kidnap foreign leaders, invade weaker nations, plunder the resources of small countries, and carry out terrorist attacks with bombs, do you intend to remain silent, or prepare to become... the order itself?" China certainly doesn't want to answer. Because answering means transforming from a builder of civilization into a guardian of the rules. But Trump's empire isn't maintaining order; it's creating neo-Nazism: Venezuela is the first, Mexico and Colombia are the second, and ultimately, every small country will understand: peace is not a right, but an insurance policy bought with nuclear weapons. The world will push China to the forefront, not because of its rise, but because there is no one else. This is the irony of the new order: the United States proves itself with bombs, while China is forced to prove its civilization with restraint.show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

55,441 subscribers

780,383 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,315 views • 7 days ago

Chinese think tank analyst Victor Gao, in an interview with Channel 4 News, said that China is fully prepared to fight to the very end "because the world is big enough that the United States is not the totality of the market in the world." The host noted that if the US shuts itself out of the China market, China will lose 15% in trade, to which Gao responded: "We don't care. China has been here for 5,000 years. Most of the time, there was no United States, and we survived. And if the United States wants to bully China, we will deal with the situation without the United States. And we expect to survive for another 5,000 years."

Chinese think tank analyst Victor Gao, in an interview with Channel 4 News, said that China is fully prepared to fight to the very end "because the world is big enough that the United States is not the totality of the market in the world." The host noted that if the US shuts itself out of the China market, China will lose 15% in trade, to which Gao responded: "We don't care. China has been here for 5,000 years. Most of the time, there was no United States, and we survived. And if the United States wants to bully China, we will deal with the situation without the United States. And we expect to survive for another 5,000 years."

Anton Gerashchenko

169,664 views • 1 year ago

Venezuela Ambassador to the United Nations Samuel Moncada: "No state can set itself up as a judge, party and executor of the world order...Venezuela is the victim of these attack because of its natural resources."

Venezuela Ambassador to the United Nations Samuel Moncada: "No state can set itself up as a judge, party and executor of the world order...Venezuela is the victim of these attack because of its natural resources."

CSPAN

46,084 views • 6 months ago

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

19,076 views • 7 months ago

Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell: Russia will only be able to destroy Ukraine if Ukraine is unable to defend itself. If the US does not provide the means to do so, are we going to do it? Question mark. This is the existential question that Europe must answer for itself: Are we in a position to help Ukraine defend itself even if the United States does not? It depends on how willing we are. So far, we have helped Ukraine more than the United States, both in civilian and military terms. Can we do even more and replace the United States? This comes at a cost, and what is needed is not only the will and the ability to pay for it, but also to convert the money into weapons. Because people don't go to the front with a bag of cash; people go to the front with weapons. And between money and weapons there is something called industry, that is, production capacity.

Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell: Russia will only be able to destroy Ukraine if Ukraine is unable to defend itself. If the US does not provide the means to do so, are we going to do it? Question mark. This is the existential question that Europe must answer for itself: Are we in a position to help Ukraine defend itself even if the United States does not? It depends on how willing we are. So far, we have helped Ukraine more than the United States, both in civilian and military terms. Can we do even more and replace the United States? This comes at a cost, and what is needed is not only the will and the ability to pay for it, but also to convert the money into weapons. Because people don't go to the front with a bag of cash; people go to the front with weapons. And between money and weapons there is something called industry, that is, production capacity.

Anton Gerashchenko

51,525 views • 9 months ago

The world sees it but has to bring down the United States, not Israel, to stop it. It's starting to happen, the US is increasingly isolated, US products are being boycotted on a massive scale, BRICS is rising, countries like Japan, Canada, and China are starting to dump US Treasury securities. The EU is funding a massive defence program with no contracts going to the US. It will unfortunately take time, but the United States will ultimately pay a heavy price for ignoring international law, the boundaries of common decency and humanity, to ally with Israel in the execution of this genocide.

The world sees it but has to bring down the United States, not Israel, to stop it. It's starting to happen, the US is increasingly isolated, US products are being boycotted on a massive scale, BRICS is rising, countries like Japan, Canada, and China are starting to dump US Treasury securities. The EU is funding a massive defence program with no contracts going to the US. It will unfortunately take time, but the United States will ultimately pay a heavy price for ignoring international law, the boundaries of common decency and humanity, to ally with Israel in the execution of this genocide.

Kerry Burgess

21,994 views • 1 year ago

Former Singaporean diplomat Kishore Mahbubani: It's not wise policy for the United States to stop the rise of China because China can no longer be stopped. The only way to stop China is to ask the Chinese government to stop improving the livelihood of its own people.

Former Singaporean diplomat Kishore Mahbubani: It's not wise policy for the United States to stop the rise of China because China can no longer be stopped. The only way to stop China is to ask the Chinese government to stop improving the livelihood of its own people.

Clash Report

21,342 views • 2 months ago

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

19,576 views • 11 days ago

China’s message at the UN is very clear: The United Nations must be defended, revitalized, and strengthened — because the very institution meant to uphold the postwar international order has been severely weakened by the country that once helped build it. That is the irony. The US helped create the UN system after World War II. Now it treats international law as optional, the Security Council as inconvenient, sovereignty as negotiable, and other nations’ lives as bargaining chips. As American power declines, its empire becomes more reckless. That is why China is calling not for a new hegemon, but for a more balanced, restrained, and multipolar order — one where no single country can decide who lives, who dies, who develops, and who must be destroyed. China understands something very old: Power without restraint always runs toward the cliff. A world governed by one empire is not order. It is domination with paperwork. What China is proposing is not submission to China. It is the restoration of basic dignity to all nations — large or small, rich or poor, powerful or vulnerable. A community with a shared future for humanity means exactly this: No country should be above the world. No people should be beneath it.

China’s message at the UN is very clear: The United Nations must be defended, revitalized, and strengthened — because the very institution meant to uphold the postwar international order has been severely weakened by the country that once helped build it. That is the irony. The US helped create the UN system after World War II. Now it treats international law as optional, the Security Council as inconvenient, sovereignty as negotiable, and other nations’ lives as bargaining chips. As American power declines, its empire becomes more reckless. That is why China is calling not for a new hegemon, but for a more balanced, restrained, and multipolar order — one where no single country can decide who lives, who dies, who develops, and who must be destroyed. China understands something very old: Power without restraint always runs toward the cliff. A world governed by one empire is not order. It is domination with paperwork. What China is proposing is not submission to China. It is the restoration of basic dignity to all nations — large or small, rich or poor, powerful or vulnerable. A community with a shared future for humanity means exactly this: No country should be above the world. No people should be beneath it.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

84,023 views • 2 months ago

🇫🇷 Marine Le Pen: "we want to leave this Europe because it is not Europe. But, friends, Europe is not the European Union! Europe is us and it is time to put our house in order. Take power in France and Europe and give it back to the people! Our Europe is fraternal, alive, confident and in love with the future. We want to build not an anonymous European Union, but a union of European nations, a union of histories and destinies, respecting nations, cultures and identities in its own thousand-year history. Europe drew its strength not from a bureaucratic factory, but from the genius and energy of each of these nations and the uniqueness of these countries. Europe was strong only because these nations were free, Europe was great only because these nations were enterprising, Europe shone only because these nations moved forward. Today, when the whole world, the United States, China, Russia and the BRICS are questioning the power of Europe, Europe can only regain its place by the return of the nations that make it up."

🇫🇷 Marine Le Pen: "we want to leave this Europe because it is not Europe. But, friends, Europe is not the European Union! Europe is us and it is time to put our house in order. Take power in France and Europe and give it back to the people! Our Europe is fraternal, alive, confident and in love with the future. We want to build not an anonymous European Union, but a union of European nations, a union of histories and destinies, respecting nations, cultures and identities in its own thousand-year history. Europe drew its strength not from a bureaucratic factory, but from the genius and energy of each of these nations and the uniqueness of these countries. Europe was strong only because these nations were free, Europe was great only because these nations were enterprising, Europe shone only because these nations moved forward. Today, when the whole world, the United States, China, Russia and the BRICS are questioning the power of Europe, Europe can only regain its place by the return of the nations that make it up."

🌐geopolitics in the picture

115,302 views • 1 year ago

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

39,060 views • 2 days ago

Selective justice makes the rest of the world believe the United States is a hypocrite. It is easy to go after China, Russia or Modi or Israel in Gaza. But we don't because of positions we have taken and countries like China exploit that.

Selective justice makes the rest of the world believe the United States is a hypocrite. It is easy to go after China, Russia or Modi or Israel in Gaza. But we don't because of positions we have taken and countries like China exploit that.

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

17,222 views • 4 months ago

Q & A: Do the US🇺🇸 and Europe🇪🇺 think India🇮🇳 is the best alternative to China🇨🇳? Afshin Rattansi: ‘I don't think India is an alternative to China, specifically because China and India are so interlocked. India's biggest trading partner is China overtaking the United States now, $151 billion. And let alone the fact that NATO needs Chinese rare earths for its missiles and military equipment. So Europe and the United States need China. And arguably, with China comes India. They also need India.’ Have a question for Afshin Rattansi? Reply below in the comments with your question and it could be answered on the next episode of New Order!

Q & A: Do the US🇺🇸 and Europe🇪🇺 think India🇮🇳 is the best alternative to China🇨🇳? Afshin Rattansi: ‘I don't think India is an alternative to China, specifically because China and India are so interlocked. India's biggest trading partner is China overtaking the United States now, $151 billion. And let alone the fact that NATO needs Chinese rare earths for its missiles and military equipment. So Europe and the United States need China. And arguably, with China comes India. They also need India.’ Have a question for Afshin Rattansi? Reply below in the comments with your question and it could be answered on the next episode of New Order!

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

38,551 views • 13 days ago

Victor Gao is the former translator for Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping. Now Vice President of the Beijing-based Centre for China and Globalisation, he gained international prominence following a viral interview with Cathy Newman of Channel 4 in the heat of the US trade war with China. Speaking at the inaugural session of the International Security Conference on Africa (ISCA), held in Kigali, Rwanda in June 2025, Gao elicited thunderous applause from the audience when he remarked that Africa should be free to use its own judgment to determine which country between China and the US works best as its development and trading partner. Here’s how he put it: “The real choice for Africa, as well as for the rest of mankind, is whether the United States is doing the right thing or is doing the wrong thing or whether China is doing the right thing or doing the wrong thing. If the United States is doing the right thing, work with the United States. But if the United States is doing the wrong thing, why should you bother about working with the United States or following its leadership? Similarly, if China is doing the right thing, why don't you want to work with China? And God forbid, if China is doing the wrong thing, why should you work with China? That means African countries, people in Africa, need to use their own brain power to make a decision first, whether this country or that country is doing the right thing or the wrong thing. Don't be forced by any other country to make a choice which will not serve your fundamental interests.”

Victor Gao is the former translator for Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping. Now Vice President of the Beijing-based Centre for China and Globalisation, he gained international prominence following a viral interview with Cathy Newman of Channel 4 in the heat of the US trade war with China. Speaking at the inaugural session of the International Security Conference on Africa (ISCA), held in Kigali, Rwanda in June 2025, Gao elicited thunderous applause from the audience when he remarked that Africa should be free to use its own judgment to determine which country between China and the US works best as its development and trading partner. Here’s how he put it: “The real choice for Africa, as well as for the rest of mankind, is whether the United States is doing the right thing or is doing the wrong thing or whether China is doing the right thing or doing the wrong thing. If the United States is doing the right thing, work with the United States. But if the United States is doing the wrong thing, why should you bother about working with the United States or following its leadership? Similarly, if China is doing the right thing, why don't you want to work with China? And God forbid, if China is doing the wrong thing, why should you work with China? That means African countries, people in Africa, need to use their own brain power to make a decision first, whether this country or that country is doing the right thing or the wrong thing. Don't be forced by any other country to make a choice which will not serve your fundamental interests.”

The Spearhead

42,913 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Jeffrey Sachs: The United States is, drunk with arrogance right now. It has invaded Venezuela. It thinks it's about to invade Cuba. It has now, attacked Iran. The United States cares nothing about the Iranian people, but the United States cares about the oil, and it cares about the military control over the Middle East, and it cares about the fact that Iransells oil to China. Because part of what's happening United States is trying to put a chokehold on oil that flows to China, whether from Venezuela or from the Middle East, or from Russia, which the US has sanctioned. And so this is, part of a game. The American leaders do not care about the people, not about the American people or about other people. They care about power, and that's what they're after.

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Jeffrey Sachs: The United States is, drunk with arrogance right now. It has invaded Venezuela. It thinks it's about to invade Cuba. It has now, attacked Iran. The United States cares nothing about the Iranian people, but the United States cares about the oil, and it cares about the military control over the Middle East, and it cares about the fact that Iransells oil to China. Because part of what's happening United States is trying to put a chokehold on oil that flows to China, whether from Venezuela or from the Middle East, or from Russia, which the US has sanctioned. And so this is, part of a game. The American leaders do not care about the people, not about the American people or about other people. They care about power, and that's what they're after.

THE ISLANDER

15,012 views • 4 months ago

Damn... I have never heard anyone threaten the US so directly. 📍"China will not fire the first shot. But will not allow you to fire the second shot." 📍"China will never allow the United States to launch a war against China, conventional or nuclear, without suffering a devastating consequences." 📍"In the Victory Day parade in Beijing, China demonstrated the weapon 61, because it contain 60 nuclear war head plus 1 hydrogen bomb." 📍"In the world China is the only country have hydrogen bomb, that ICBM can cover every corner of the world in less than 20 mins and destroy any target any corner of the world without any possibilities of being intercepted." 📍"If you want a war you will get war." 📍"If you want to destroy China, you will be destroyed." 📍"If you want to impose nuclear war on China you will be wiped out of the world." Victor Gao, vice president of the Center for China and Globalization

Damn... I have never heard anyone threaten the US so directly. 📍"China will not fire the first shot. But will not allow you to fire the second shot." 📍"China will never allow the United States to launch a war against China, conventional or nuclear, without suffering a devastating consequences." 📍"In the Victory Day parade in Beijing, China demonstrated the weapon 61, because it contain 60 nuclear war head plus 1 hydrogen bomb." 📍"In the world China is the only country have hydrogen bomb, that ICBM can cover every corner of the world in less than 20 mins and destroy any target any corner of the world without any possibilities of being intercepted." 📍"If you want a war you will get war." 📍"If you want to destroy China, you will be destroyed." 📍"If you want to impose nuclear war on China you will be wiped out of the world." Victor Gao, vice president of the Center for China and Globalization

OsintTV 📺

186,532 views • 9 months ago

"A lot of people inside the United States foreign policy apparatus are very worried that the reason so many countries now prefer China as the superpower with whom they deal, rather than the United States, is because the United States goes around the world, throwing its military might around the world, threatening everybody, constantly involved in wars. And China doesn't." Aaron Bastani in conversation with Glenn Greenwald in this week's US foreign policy-focused episode of Downstream.

"A lot of people inside the United States foreign policy apparatus are very worried that the reason so many countries now prefer China as the superpower with whom they deal, rather than the United States, is because the United States goes around the world, throwing its military might around the world, threatening everybody, constantly involved in wars. And China doesn't." Aaron Bastani in conversation with Glenn Greenwald in this week's US foreign policy-focused episode of Downstream.

Novara Media

80,599 views • 6 months ago

"NATO is running Europe. Europe is not a democracy. It's run by the United States via NATO. It's made sure that the only officials in charge of foreign policy are servants of the United States, not Europe. Their job is to make sure that Europe has no voice independently of what the US wants to do. In order for Europe to develop and to be a democracy, it must dissolve NATO because the purpose of NATO is singular: to attack Russia and to become an Asian power in the South China Sea to attack China as well. It's an aggressive attacking power," comments Professor Michael Hudson in the latest episode of our podcast. ▶️ Watch the full interview with Professor Michael Hudson on our YouTube channel:

"NATO is running Europe. Europe is not a democracy. It's run by the United States via NATO. It's made sure that the only officials in charge of foreign policy are servants of the United States, not Europe. Their job is to make sure that Europe has no voice independently of what the US wants to do. In order for Europe to develop and to be a democracy, it must dissolve NATO because the purpose of NATO is singular: to attack Russia and to become an Asian power in the South China Sea to attack China as well. It's an aggressive attacking power," comments Professor Michael Hudson in the latest episode of our podcast. ▶️ Watch the full interview with Professor Michael Hudson on our YouTube channel:

Lena Petrova

45,677 views • 6 months ago

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,281 views • 15 days ago