Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The WPATH Files consists of posts from WPATH’s members-only forum. Membership costs $225. These were not leaked internal memos, but publicly available posts. WPATH has been very open about their experiment with castrating children, and women ("TERFs") have been criticizing the organization for well over a decade now. The... WPATH Files did not present new information, but rather was designed to lend credit, authority, and esteem to certain individuals. In fact, I know for certain it was a copycat report based on my investigation into the Eunuch Archive, which exposed the influence of pedophiles on WPATH's Standards of Care, because I was initially asked to write the WPATH Files - and instead, turned my attention to male criminals in women's prisons. Here's former WPATH president Walter Bockting commenting in 2016, publicly, that children given "puberty blockers" can be rendered infertile, and can become adults with childlike genitalia.show more

Genevieve Gluck

94,451 subscribers

22,677 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Gesundheit & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Why I Am Publishing WPATH Files And How I Got Them The written WPATH Files come from WPATH’s member discussion forum, which runs on software provided by DocMatter. Ninety seconds of the 82-minute video was made public last year. We are making the full video available for the first time. One or more people gave me the WPATH Files, and my colleagues and I attempted to summarize them as a series of articles. We quickly realized the topic was too sensitive, complex, and large to be dealt with as a work of journalism, and we moved the project to the research institute I founded seven years ago, Environmental Progress (EP). The Files are authentic. We redacted most names and left only those individuals who are leading gender medicine practitioners to whom we sent “right-of-reply” emails. We know WPATH members discussed our emails internally. No WPATH leader or member has denied that the Files are anything other than what they appear to be. EP is publishing a 70-page report to provide context for the 170 pages of WPATH Files. Mia Hughes is the author of the report. It and accompanying summary materials can be downloaded at the link below. That link also provides a link to the full WPATH video. What follows are simply a few highlights. People with a serious interest in the topic should read the report and all the files:

Why I Am Publishing WPATH Files And How I Got Them The written WPATH Files come from WPATH’s member discussion forum, which runs on software provided by DocMatter. Ninety seconds of the 82-minute video was made public last year. We are making the full video available for the first time. One or more people gave me the WPATH Files, and my colleagues and I attempted to summarize them as a series of articles. We quickly realized the topic was too sensitive, complex, and large to be dealt with as a work of journalism, and we moved the project to the research institute I founded seven years ago, Environmental Progress (EP). The Files are authentic. We redacted most names and left only those individuals who are leading gender medicine practitioners to whom we sent “right-of-reply” emails. We know WPATH members discussed our emails internally. No WPATH leader or member has denied that the Files are anything other than what they appear to be. EP is publishing a 70-page report to provide context for the 170 pages of WPATH Files. Mia Hughes is the author of the report. It and accompanying summary materials can be downloaded at the link below. That link also provides a link to the full WPATH video. What follows are simply a few highlights. People with a serious interest in the topic should read the report and all the files:

Michael Shellenberger

605,006 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

In December 2021 when WPATH released the draft Standards of Care 8, I immediately noticed the reference to the castration fetish forum the Eunuch Archive, because I was already aware of it. I have been speaking about it for years, and discovered the identities of several men - some of whom attended WPATH conferences and worked with pro-pedophile sexologists. I also discovered that the forum itself was co-founded by a man (Thomas Pidel) now in prison after being convicted of running a pedophile ring. WPATH wasn't just associated with an online community of pedophiles who wrote graphic fantasies about castrating and raping boys. They invited them to contribute to the Standards of Care. And one academic who was an administrator of the forum and wrote child sexual abuse stories himself claims he influenced the APA's decision to include "gender dysphoria in children" in the DSM-5.

In December 2021 when WPATH released the draft Standards of Care 8, I immediately noticed the reference to the castration fetish forum the Eunuch Archive, because I was already aware of it. I have been speaking about it for years, and discovered the identities of several men - some of whom attended WPATH conferences and worked with pro-pedophile sexologists. I also discovered that the forum itself was co-founded by a man (Thomas Pidel) now in prison after being convicted of running a pedophile ring. WPATH wasn't just associated with an online community of pedophiles who wrote graphic fantasies about castrating and raping boys. They invited them to contribute to the Standards of Care. And one academic who was an administrator of the forum and wrote child sexual abuse stories himself claims he influenced the APA's decision to include "gender dysphoria in children" in the DSM-5.

Genevieve Gluck

37,716 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Two years ago I was calling for an investigation into the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) based on seeing extreme castration fetish pornography content associated with the organization - specifically in regards to disturbing and pedophilic depictions of child sexual abuse, on a eunuch forum cited by WPATH. Allie Beth Stuckey was one of the very first people to take me seriously about this.

Two years ago I was calling for an investigation into the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) based on seeing extreme castration fetish pornography content associated with the organization - specifically in regards to disturbing and pedophilic depictions of child sexual abuse, on a eunuch forum cited by WPATH. Allie Beth Stuckey was one of the very first people to take me seriously about this.

Genevieve Gluck

182,721 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨Leaked documents EXPOSED that senior officials at the leading international body on “gender affirming care” knowingly destroyed children's lives. “This is one of the biggest medical scandals of my lifetime.” And the legacy media covered it all up. Andrew Doyle just broke down the WPATH Files and why they dismantled the entire idea of “gender affirming care.” “WPATH is the World Professional Association of Transgender Health. It is the leading international body on what they call gender affirming care.” “In other words, a vulnerable person, a child, can come and say… I’m born in the wrong body, and the initial response must be to affirm that, even to medicalize that, so that this individual’s perception of themself aligns more closely with their body.” “That in itself is a controversial, unscientific position to take.” “But what makes matters worse is the leaked memos from WPATH… prove that senior individuals at WPATH… were fully aware that a lot of these vulnerable people could not possibly give informed consent to the treatment that they were receiving.” “You have these doctors talking about how these kids don’t even have biology at high school… they can’t possibly understand the concept of losing the capacity for sexual pleasure in later life, or infertility in later life. How can a prepubescent even understand what any of that means?” “They knew all of this.” “Those leaked files should have been front page of all the papers for weeks.” “BBC hasn’t mentioned it once.” “There is a deep ideological rot at the heart of it.”

🚨Leaked documents EXPOSED that senior officials at the leading international body on “gender affirming care” knowingly destroyed children's lives. “This is one of the biggest medical scandals of my lifetime.” And the legacy media covered it all up. Andrew Doyle just broke down the WPATH Files and why they dismantled the entire idea of “gender affirming care.” “WPATH is the World Professional Association of Transgender Health. It is the leading international body on what they call gender affirming care.” “In other words, a vulnerable person, a child, can come and say… I’m born in the wrong body, and the initial response must be to affirm that, even to medicalize that, so that this individual’s perception of themself aligns more closely with their body.” “That in itself is a controversial, unscientific position to take.” “But what makes matters worse is the leaked memos from WPATH… prove that senior individuals at WPATH… were fully aware that a lot of these vulnerable people could not possibly give informed consent to the treatment that they were receiving.” “You have these doctors talking about how these kids don’t even have biology at high school… they can’t possibly understand the concept of losing the capacity for sexual pleasure in later life, or infertility in later life. How can a prepubescent even understand what any of that means?” “They knew all of this.” “Those leaked files should have been front page of all the papers for weeks.” “BBC hasn’t mentioned it once.” “There is a deep ideological rot at the heart of it.”

Jan Jekielek

164,408 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"The Eunuch Archive was named in the WPATH draft standards of care 8 document... And that website has a link to a fiction archive where there are thousands of stories written about graphic castration, explicit sexual castration, even of children." Thank you to everyone who has helped me get this story, first published by , out to a wider audience - especially pagliacci the hated 🌝 for putting up with me during the process. And thank you to Andrew Doyle for having the guts to report not just on this, but the entire scandal of the #WPATHFiles.

Sensitive content

"The Eunuch Archive was named in the WPATH draft standards of care 8 document... And that website has a link to a fiction archive where there are thousands of stories written about graphic castration, explicit sexual castration, even of children." Thank you to everyone who has helped me get this story, first published by , out to a wider audience - especially pagliacci the hated 🌝 for putting up with me during the process. And thank you to Andrew Doyle for having the guts to report not just on this, but the entire scandal of the #WPATHFiles.

Genevieve Gluck

1,360,571 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. Natasha Johnson, a pediatrician at McMaster University, has become president of the Canadian Paediatric Society. Dr. Johnson said at a 2022 WPATH conference that "parents' feelings" about their child's medicalized gender transition "should not be prioritized over the youth’s experience.” In other words, she argued for discounting parental objections to prescribing their children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to treat gender dysphoria. Dr. Johnson was instrumental in stirring up the protests against the recent systematic reviews of pediatric gender medicine out of Dr. Gordon Guyatt's lab. These protests ultimately led Dr. Guyatt and some of his colleagues to denounce their funder, the Society for Evidence Based Gender Medicine SEGM, and seek to pull their names off of pending review papers, putting them in limbo. More on the WPATH videos here: More on the McMaster protests here:

Dr. Natasha Johnson, a pediatrician at McMaster University, has become president of the Canadian Paediatric Society. Dr. Johnson said at a 2022 WPATH conference that "parents' feelings" about their child's medicalized gender transition "should not be prioritized over the youth’s experience.” In other words, she argued for discounting parental objections to prescribing their children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to treat gender dysphoria. Dr. Johnson was instrumental in stirring up the protests against the recent systematic reviews of pediatric gender medicine out of Dr. Gordon Guyatt's lab. These protests ultimately led Dr. Guyatt and some of his colleagues to denounce their funder, the Society for Evidence Based Gender Medicine SEGM, and seek to pull their names off of pending review papers, putting them in limbo. More on the WPATH videos here: More on the McMaster protests here:

Benjamin Ryan

24,666 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚩 The WPATH leaked files is making headlines all around the world - except here in NZ. Remember how Chloe and Adern and all the other idiotic pollies chanted that If kids aren’t medicated and butchered then they’ll commit suicide? and that kids wanted this extreme treatment to make them “happy”.. Yeah it was all based on “medical evidence” from WPATH - and it was all BULLSHIT … anyone with half a brain knew that it was rubbish from activists. Well all those laws that the NZ parliament supported, all that crap Shaneel Lal advocated for - is now falling apart - as the leaked files show - kids and Parents don’t understand the implications - kids become sterile -kids who take blockers will never have an orgasm or any sexual function - Hormones are known to cause aggressive cancers - most trans patients are found to have some other mental condition. The NZ equivalent of WPATH is PATHA, run by a Trans woman and some other trans maniac lunatics. Jamie Veale is the head of PATHA and is on the board of WPATH- and the NZ ministry of health takes their recommendations to form Policy. How come no journo is covering this? This will be one of the biggest medical scandals ever - a sick ideology to ruin kids. Nothing more than Neo Marxism writ large. In the future there will be thousands of angry, sick and desperate adults with ballooning medical costs and a shortened life span who were pushed into this sick cult. Get writing letters people. Watch this video from Bob McCroskrie and ask what you are doing to stop this perversion of children’s innocence and the subjection of kids to a life time of Illness and misery.

🚩 The WPATH leaked files is making headlines all around the world - except here in NZ. Remember how Chloe and Adern and all the other idiotic pollies chanted that If kids aren’t medicated and butchered then they’ll commit suicide? and that kids wanted this extreme treatment to make them “happy”.. Yeah it was all based on “medical evidence” from WPATH - and it was all BULLSHIT … anyone with half a brain knew that it was rubbish from activists. Well all those laws that the NZ parliament supported, all that crap Shaneel Lal advocated for - is now falling apart - as the leaked files show - kids and Parents don’t understand the implications - kids become sterile -kids who take blockers will never have an orgasm or any sexual function - Hormones are known to cause aggressive cancers - most trans patients are found to have some other mental condition. The NZ equivalent of WPATH is PATHA, run by a Trans woman and some other trans maniac lunatics. Jamie Veale is the head of PATHA and is on the board of WPATH- and the NZ ministry of health takes their recommendations to form Policy. How come no journo is covering this? This will be one of the biggest medical scandals ever - a sick ideology to ruin kids. Nothing more than Neo Marxism writ large. In the future there will be thousands of angry, sick and desperate adults with ballooning medical costs and a shortened life span who were pushed into this sick cult. Get writing letters people. Watch this video from Bob McCroskrie and ask what you are doing to stop this perversion of children’s innocence and the subjection of kids to a life time of Illness and misery.

Holyhekatuiteka

15,936 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The United Kingdom exports "Gender Affirming Care" to the USA. Dr Helen Webberley (in the video) is the founder of which is now launched in the USA to help support mentally ill people (including children) who cut off their breasts and genitals. She had her medical licence revoked because she has an 'offshore' gender clinic which gives/gave children access to puberty blockers. GenderGP facilitates the provision of puberty blockers via nasal spray or injection to kids as young as eight - in contravention of the Cass Report. Dr Helen Webberley's online GenderGP clinic follows guidance from WPATH (World Professional Association for Transgender Health) which has been exposed for “widespread medical malpractice on children and vulnerable adults” by Robert Clarke who is a leading human rights lawyer and serves as Director of Advocacy at ADF International based in London.

The United Kingdom exports "Gender Affirming Care" to the USA. Dr Helen Webberley (in the video) is the founder of which is now launched in the USA to help support mentally ill people (including children) who cut off their breasts and genitals. She had her medical licence revoked because she has an 'offshore' gender clinic which gives/gave children access to puberty blockers. GenderGP facilitates the provision of puberty blockers via nasal spray or injection to kids as young as eight - in contravention of the Cass Report. Dr Helen Webberley's online GenderGP clinic follows guidance from WPATH (World Professional Association for Transgender Health) which has been exposed for “widespread medical malpractice on children and vulnerable adults” by Robert Clarke who is a leading human rights lawyer and serves as Director of Advocacy at ADF International based in London.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

52,752 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Johanna Olson-Kennedy: “I think that a lot of this conversation...gets talked about through a lens of ‘How can we make sure people are really trans,’ right? And ‘They’re not going to regret their decision later?’” But “that’s actually not the discussion that I’m interested in participating in," she said. "I’m interested in discussing and having a conversation about giving the very best possible care to trans young people—the care that they need and deserve.” To read my article in Compact about the 100s of videos I obtained from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and its US offshoot, USPATH: I will be publishing the most notable conference videos on my Subsack:

Johanna Olson-Kennedy: “I think that a lot of this conversation...gets talked about through a lens of ‘How can we make sure people are really trans,’ right? And ‘They’re not going to regret their decision later?’” But “that’s actually not the discussion that I’m interested in participating in," she said. "I’m interested in discussing and having a conversation about giving the very best possible care to trans young people—the care that they need and deserve.” To read my article in Compact about the 100s of videos I obtained from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and its US offshoot, USPATH: I will be publishing the most notable conference videos on my Subsack:

Benjamin Ryan

18,866 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

#WATCH | West Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose says, "The landmark judgment by the Supreme Court has cleared the jurisdiction of the Govt vis-à-vis the elected CM. The Court has unequivocally declared that Governor is not rubber stamp. Court has decided that a timeline can be set for the Governor in exercising his authority in respect of giving assent to the files to the Bills...Here, in Bengal, there are 4 files which are pending with the State Govt in the process of dialogue with the Govt. Certain clarifications have been sought from the Govt. Once that is received, the dialogue process is complete and I will be able to make a decision in giving assent to those files. The rest of the files are pending with the President of India because they involve certain aspects which have an all-India relevance and also legal and constitutional implications which are sent to the President of India..." (Video: Governor's Office)

#WATCH | West Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose says, "The landmark judgment by the Supreme Court has cleared the jurisdiction of the Govt vis-à-vis the elected CM. The Court has unequivocally declared that Governor is not rubber stamp. Court has decided that a timeline can be set for the Governor in exercising his authority in respect of giving assent to the files to the Bills...Here, in Bengal, there are 4 files which are pending with the State Govt in the process of dialogue with the Govt. Certain clarifications have been sought from the Govt. Once that is received, the dialogue process is complete and I will be able to make a decision in giving assent to those files. The rest of the files are pending with the President of India because they involve certain aspects which have an all-India relevance and also legal and constitutional implications which are sent to the President of India..." (Video: Governor's Office)

ANI

43,675 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just CONFIRMED that the victims CLEARED President Trump of Epstein wrongdoing, the left was EXPOSED "We've asked the victims SPECIFICALLY on whether or not President Trump had hurt them, and he was exonerated! He released the files, and they don't want to report that!" "What they want to try to do is take this and have us say on record whether or not we will subpoena the president to come testify, in which I respond, the president is not considered a person of interest in this investigation." "He's been nothing but cooperative, at least with us and members of the task force." "And I think that his record will reflect that he has released all files." Anna Paulina Luna 🔥

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just CONFIRMED that the victims CLEARED President Trump of Epstein wrongdoing, the left was EXPOSED "We've asked the victims SPECIFICALLY on whether or not President Trump had hurt them, and he was exonerated! He released the files, and they don't want to report that!" "What they want to try to do is take this and have us say on record whether or not we will subpoena the president to come testify, in which I respond, the president is not considered a person of interest in this investigation." "He's been nothing but cooperative, at least with us and members of the task force." "And I think that his record will reflect that he has released all files." Anna Paulina Luna 🔥

Eric Daugherty

201,398 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Bondi: In February, I did an interview on FOX. It been getting a lot of attention because I said -- I was asked a question about the client list. My response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed. Meaning the file along with the J.F.K. And M.L.K. Files. That’s what I meant

Bondi: In February, I did an interview on FOX. It been getting a lot of attention because I said -- I was asked a question about the client list. My response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed. Meaning the file along with the J.F.K. And M.L.K. Files. That’s what I meant

Acyn

126,000 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kash Patel: There is no Credible Information in FBI Case Files Jeffrey Epstein Trafficked Children to anyone but Himself — BUT, I’m not saying he never did… “Just to remind folks.. the Epstein case files existed in the two prior administrations — the Obama & Biden Administrations. They didn’t release anything. Then there was President Trump in the first administration that renewed charges against Epstein. But what EXISTS in the FBI case files was a direct result of the limited search warrants from 2006 and 2007, which hamstrung future investigations because of the non-prosecution agreement. MULTIPLE administrations had the opportunity to look at the entirety of the case files, and recommend prosecutions against anyone trafficked under Epstein. The ONLY person to bring Charges was in Trump’s administration. Now I am NOT saying that others were not trafficked and others were not involved, I am telling you based on the information we have… there isn’t…”

Kash Patel: There is no Credible Information in FBI Case Files Jeffrey Epstein Trafficked Children to anyone but Himself — BUT, I’m not saying he never did… “Just to remind folks.. the Epstein case files existed in the two prior administrations — the Obama & Biden Administrations. They didn’t release anything. Then there was President Trump in the first administration that renewed charges against Epstein. But what EXISTS in the FBI case files was a direct result of the limited search warrants from 2006 and 2007, which hamstrung future investigations because of the non-prosecution agreement. MULTIPLE administrations had the opportunity to look at the entirety of the case files, and recommend prosecutions against anyone trafficked under Epstein. The ONLY person to bring Charges was in Trump’s administration. Now I am NOT saying that others were not trafficked and others were not involved, I am telling you based on the information we have… there isn’t…”

MJTruthUltra

688,392 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Kash Patel on Epstein: "What we have done, and just to remind folks, the Epstein case files existed in the two prior administrations, in the Obama administration and the Biden administration, and they didn't release anything." "There was President Trump in the first administration that renewed charges against Mr. Epstein. And I know it's a little complicated to understand, but what exists in the Epstein case files was a direct result of the limited search warrants from 2006 and 2007, which hamstrung future investigations because of the non-prosecution agreement." "Multiple administrations had the opportunity to look at the entirety of that case file and recommend prosecutions against anyone that was trafficked under Mr. Epstein and anyone that participated in that trafficking. And the only person to bring charges was the prior administration against Mr. Epstein. Now, I am not saying that others were not trafficked and others were not involved." "What I am telling you is that based on the information we have, and we have continuously and publicly asked for the public to come forward with more information, if there is, we'll look at it. But based on credible information, we have released all credible information and the information that the Department of Justice and the FBI never releases is information on investigations that are not credible. And we don't release the names of victims who weren't credible, but in the same time, we don't release the names of victims who were credible. And so the information, that's by law. And so the information we are releasing now is historic and it is also to the maximum capacity that the law allows." "I know that's not going to satisfy many, many, many people, but if they wanted it done right, then the investigation from its origination should have been done right and he should not have been given a get out of jail free card to do jail on the weekends for 12 hours a day and he should have been investigated fully for the entirety of his crime and criminal enterprise not just from 1997 to 2001."

Kash Patel on Epstein: "What we have done, and just to remind folks, the Epstein case files existed in the two prior administrations, in the Obama administration and the Biden administration, and they didn't release anything." "There was President Trump in the first administration that renewed charges against Mr. Epstein. And I know it's a little complicated to understand, but what exists in the Epstein case files was a direct result of the limited search warrants from 2006 and 2007, which hamstrung future investigations because of the non-prosecution agreement." "Multiple administrations had the opportunity to look at the entirety of that case file and recommend prosecutions against anyone that was trafficked under Mr. Epstein and anyone that participated in that trafficking. And the only person to bring charges was the prior administration against Mr. Epstein. Now, I am not saying that others were not trafficked and others were not involved." "What I am telling you is that based on the information we have, and we have continuously and publicly asked for the public to come forward with more information, if there is, we'll look at it. But based on credible information, we have released all credible information and the information that the Department of Justice and the FBI never releases is information on investigations that are not credible. And we don't release the names of victims who weren't credible, but in the same time, we don't release the names of victims who were credible. And so the information, that's by law. And so the information we are releasing now is historic and it is also to the maximum capacity that the law allows." "I know that's not going to satisfy many, many, many people, but if they wanted it done right, then the investigation from its origination should have been done right and he should not have been given a get out of jail free card to do jail on the weekends for 12 hours a day and he should have been investigated fully for the entirety of his crime and criminal enterprise not just from 1997 to 2001."

Gunther Eagleman™

52,307 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Remember QAnon? It was a conspiracy theory, that morphed into a movement. In my professional assessment, a psyop. Michael Flynn was deeply involved from the very beginning. This is from a scientific evaluation of Twitter posts. But have you noticed how, with the government shutdown and other urgent stories, we’re not discussing the need to release the Epstein files? Additionally, Mike Johnson has the authority to "swear in" the recently elected Democratic congresswoman! He refuses to do so, apparently because she would be the 218th vote to discharge the Epstein files? We know Donald Trump is in the Epstein files - Elon Musk himself said so, and we now have overwhelming evidence, even from Epstein’s brother, that they were best friends. Michael Flynn was asked about his involvement in QAnon, and he got defensive and said, “I’m against pedophiles.” This clip is particularly enlightening for folks who got involved with MAGA and Trump through QAnon, believing there was a huge Democrat child trafficking Hollywood conspiracy. But seriously, if you truly care about children and victims of sex trafficking, we need to pressure the GOP. It’s time to discharge the Epstein files. What do you think? Video credit: Channel 4 News

Remember QAnon? It was a conspiracy theory, that morphed into a movement. In my professional assessment, a psyop. Michael Flynn was deeply involved from the very beginning. This is from a scientific evaluation of Twitter posts. But have you noticed how, with the government shutdown and other urgent stories, we’re not discussing the need to release the Epstein files? Additionally, Mike Johnson has the authority to "swear in" the recently elected Democratic congresswoman! He refuses to do so, apparently because she would be the 218th vote to discharge the Epstein files? We know Donald Trump is in the Epstein files - Elon Musk himself said so, and we now have overwhelming evidence, even from Epstein’s brother, that they were best friends. Michael Flynn was asked about his involvement in QAnon, and he got defensive and said, “I’m against pedophiles.” This clip is particularly enlightening for folks who got involved with MAGA and Trump through QAnon, believing there was a huge Democrat child trafficking Hollywood conspiracy. But seriously, if you truly care about children and victims of sex trafficking, we need to pressure the GOP. It’s time to discharge the Epstein files. What do you think? Video credit: Channel 4 News

Steven Hassan, PhD

27,150 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Congressman Robert Garcia: "The Department of Justice continues to lead a White House cover-up. We're going to be demanding...that the remaining files that have not been released get released to the public. That includes new files that were just discovered in the last couple says of a survivor that has made serious accusation and allegations against not just Jeffrey Epstein but also against President Trump and about abuse that she suffered when she was a minor. We have seen the DOJ files and the archive manifest that clearly shows that the interviews and information around this survivor have been removed and are missing from the DOJ files. Where are these files? Who removed them?" Full video here:

.Congressman Robert Garcia: "The Department of Justice continues to lead a White House cover-up. We're going to be demanding...that the remaining files that have not been released get released to the public. That includes new files that were just discovered in the last couple says of a survivor that has made serious accusation and allegations against not just Jeffrey Epstein but also against President Trump and about abuse that she suffered when she was a minor. We have seen the DOJ files and the archive manifest that clearly shows that the interviews and information around this survivor have been removed and are missing from the DOJ files. Where are these files? Who removed them?" Full video here:

CSPAN

11,935 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

24,130 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

348,031 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

#WATCH | Delhi | Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "It was a very good briefing with the Foreign Secretary on all the issues to deal with the Iran war that were not covered in the earlier briefing when he was himself not present... 17 members attended, and all of them had very serious questions for the Foreign Secretary... Everything was discussed, our relationship with every single significant country in the region and beyond, larger questions of strategy, energy security, geopolitics, and Pakistan's role... There is a certain appreciation of this ongoing dialogue between the Foreign Ministry and the Committee. The Committee has felt very much that we are taken into confidence in the right sort of way, and in turn, want to be constructive in our criticisms, questions and challenges to the government for ourselves as parliamentarians, to represent the voice of the people of India. It has been a good exercise, but we all agree that this is not something we need to talk about publicly."

#WATCH | Delhi | Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "It was a very good briefing with the Foreign Secretary on all the issues to deal with the Iran war that were not covered in the earlier briefing when he was himself not present... 17 members attended, and all of them had very serious questions for the Foreign Secretary... Everything was discussed, our relationship with every single significant country in the region and beyond, larger questions of strategy, energy security, geopolitics, and Pakistan's role... There is a certain appreciation of this ongoing dialogue between the Foreign Ministry and the Committee. The Committee has felt very much that we are taken into confidence in the right sort of way, and in turn, want to be constructive in our criticisms, questions and challenges to the government for ourselves as parliamentarians, to represent the voice of the people of India. It has been a good exercise, but we all agree that this is not something we need to talk about publicly."

ANI

61,853 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten