Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The WSJ reported that China’s top general may have leaked nuclear secrets to the U.S. But China analyst Heng He says this is nonsense. He alleges that the story was planted in Western media. Why? To frame him as a traitor. Xi Jinping is purging China’s military leadership—and it’s...

JanJekielek's profile picture

Jan Jekielek

207,011 subscribers

11,819 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“Even if you follow Xi Jinping, you still will be purged. So the hidden rule is broken. I think that will be the end of the whole system,” says China analyst Heng He. With the recent purges of two top military generals, Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli, five of the seven members of China’s Central Military Commission have effectively been purged or removed. Only two remain, one of which is Xi Jinping himself. Zhang Youxia is known to have been a longtime ally of Xi Jinping, but was purged nonetheless. The CCP, like a mafia, is governed by unwritten rules. Now, Xi Jinping has broken all the CCP’s hidden rules, He says. “Now nobody knows whom to trust,” and that’s a big problem for the CCP. Xi has essentially purged the two remaining generals with actual battlefield experience. The Chinese military, Heng explains, is different from armed forces in the rest of the world. It’s ruled by the Chinese Communist Party and its primary function has been to protect the Communist Party—not to fight wars overseas. The CCP’s leaders, he explains, depend on the protection of the military, but at the same time they do not trust the military: “They are afraid that they will turn the gun to the wrong side.” But, in order to conquer Taiwan which, Heng tells me, is Xi’s lifelong dream, the generals must be put in full control: “Xi Jinping cannot fight himself, right? He has to give the command to the military leaders. That means the military has the power to turn the gun backwards.” With the removal of General Zhang Youxia—who appears to have opposed Xi Jinping’s views on an invasion of Taiwan—Xi removed an obstacle - but at what price? “The chain of command in the military is totally broken…This never happened in the history of communist rule,” he said.
5:36

“Even if you follow Xi Jinping, you still will be purged. So the hidden rule is broken. I think that will be the end of the whole system,” says China analyst Heng He. With the recent purges of two top military generals, Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli, five of the seven members of China’s Central Military Commission have effectively been purged or removed. Only two remain, one of which is Xi Jinping himself. Zhang Youxia is known to have been a longtime ally of Xi Jinping, but was purged nonetheless. The CCP, like a mafia, is governed by unwritten rules. Now, Xi Jinping has broken all the CCP’s hidden rules, He says. “Now nobody knows whom to trust,” and that’s a big problem for the CCP. Xi has essentially purged the two remaining generals with actual battlefield experience. The Chinese military, Heng explains, is different from armed forces in the rest of the world. It’s ruled by the Chinese Communist Party and its primary function has been to protect the Communist Party—not to fight wars overseas. The CCP’s leaders, he explains, depend on the protection of the military, but at the same time they do not trust the military: “They are afraid that they will turn the gun to the wrong side.” But, in order to conquer Taiwan which, Heng tells me, is Xi’s lifelong dream, the generals must be put in full control: “Xi Jinping cannot fight himself, right? He has to give the command to the military leaders. That means the military has the power to turn the gun backwards.” With the removal of General Zhang Youxia—who appears to have opposed Xi Jinping’s views on an invasion of Taiwan—Xi removed an obstacle - but at what price? “The chain of command in the military is totally broken…This never happened in the history of communist rule,” he said.

Jan Jekielek

47,416 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Where is Zhang Youxia? Is he the latest victim of Xi's military purge? January 20, Xi Jinping spoke at a major Party seminar. All Politburo Standing Committee members were present. But one absence stood out. CMC Vice Chairman Zhang Youxia did not appear in CCTV footage. In this deep-dive video, I break down the rumors swirling around Zhang Youxia, Vice Chairman of China’s Central Military Commission, and the recent disappearances of top generals like He Hongjun, He Weidong, and Miao Hua. Some speculate there’s been a power grab inside the PLA—but that theory ignores the cold reality of how China’s military is actually structured under Xi Jinping.
8:23

Where is Zhang Youxia? Is he the latest victim of Xi's military purge? January 20, Xi Jinping spoke at a major Party seminar. All Politburo Standing Committee members were present. But one absence stood out. CMC Vice Chairman Zhang Youxia did not appear in CCTV footage. In this deep-dive video, I break down the rumors swirling around Zhang Youxia, Vice Chairman of China’s Central Military Commission, and the recent disappearances of top generals like He Hongjun, He Weidong, and Miao Hua. Some speculate there’s been a power grab inside the PLA—but that theory ignores the cold reality of how China’s military is actually structured under Xi Jinping.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

19,236 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

“Trump was bluffing. They called his bluff. And he backed down. And you can say that he was doing this to soothe the markets. Another way to say that is that he’s doing this to manipulate the markets. And what have we seen? We’ve seen the president completely change his explanation of what he wants. Just days ago, he was calling for unconditional surrender. Now he’s saying, okay, we want to make a deal with such and such terms. And this is complete strategic incoherence. And despite the fact that we have a military that can hit any target that trump tells it to hit, if we have no strategic direction, then there’s no clear way to get to the end of this war.” “Now, it’s a good thing, I think, that Trump has realized that he’s going to have to deal with the Iranians. But to do so in a way that has no coherence and no actual plan for extricating the U.S. out of this war is is diplomatic malpractice.”
0:44

“Trump was bluffing. They called his bluff. And he backed down. And you can say that he was doing this to soothe the markets. Another way to say that is that he’s doing this to manipulate the markets. And what have we seen? We’ve seen the president completely change his explanation of what he wants. Just days ago, he was calling for unconditional surrender. Now he’s saying, okay, we want to make a deal with such and such terms. And this is complete strategic incoherence. And despite the fact that we have a military that can hit any target that trump tells it to hit, if we have no strategic direction, then there’s no clear way to get to the end of this war.” “Now, it’s a good thing, I think, that Trump has realized that he’s going to have to deal with the Iranians. But to do so in a way that has no coherence and no actual plan for extricating the U.S. out of this war is is diplomatic malpractice.”

Josh Rogin

158,744 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Trump: "I have nothing against the Pope. His brother is MAGA all the way. I like his brother. I'm not fighting with him. I can disagree with the Pope. I have a right to disagree with the Pope. This is the real world. It's a nasty world. If the Pope would allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, he cannot do that."
1:56

Trump: "I have nothing against the Pope. His brother is MAGA all the way. I like his brother. I'm not fighting with him. I can disagree with the Pope. I have a right to disagree with the Pope. This is the real world. It's a nasty world. If the Pope would allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, he cannot do that."

Aaron Rupar

48,708 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Chamath Palihapitiya says President Trump has been “way more right than wrong” and explained why Trump’s stance on Iran ultimately won him over. Palihapitiya said Trump’s unwavering position against a nuclear-armed was about preventing the one scenario that could threaten civilization itself. PALIHAPITIYA: “On the broad based things that he did, I think that he has been way more right than wrong.” SORKIN: “Where do you land on the war in Iran?” PALIHAPITIYA: “The most important thing that got me to see his point of view is he was completely binary on there can not be nuclear war.” “And what’s so interesting about, you know, like Warren Buffett in that last segment, who, by the way, should give all of his money if he wants to give it away to Trump Accounts…” “If you ask Buffett, Buffett would also say the same thing. He and Munger used to say in their letters, there’s only one risk for humanity: nuclear war.” “And so when you have a madman country that is attempting to destabilize the ability for all of us just to live our lives, I think he was pulled into a situation he didn’t want to be in because he believed strongly in no nuclear weapons.” “I support that because I think everybody is forgetting the chaos that that kind of thing can create in the world.” Chamath Palihapitiya
1:02

Chamath Palihapitiya says President Trump has been “way more right than wrong” and explained why Trump’s stance on Iran ultimately won him over. Palihapitiya said Trump’s unwavering position against a nuclear-armed was about preventing the one scenario that could threaten civilization itself. PALIHAPITIYA: “On the broad based things that he did, I think that he has been way more right than wrong.” SORKIN: “Where do you land on the war in Iran?” PALIHAPITIYA: “The most important thing that got me to see his point of view is he was completely binary on there can not be nuclear war.” “And what’s so interesting about, you know, like Warren Buffett in that last segment, who, by the way, should give all of his money if he wants to give it away to Trump Accounts…” “If you ask Buffett, Buffett would also say the same thing. He and Munger used to say in their letters, there’s only one risk for humanity: nuclear war.” “And so when you have a madman country that is attempting to destabilize the ability for all of us just to live our lives, I think he was pulled into a situation he didn’t want to be in because he believed strongly in no nuclear weapons.” “I support that because I think everybody is forgetting the chaos that that kind of thing can create in the world.” Chamath Palihapitiya

Overton

78,041 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A C-SPAN caller just gave a perspective on President Trump that you almost never hear in the media. C-SPAN CALLER: “First of all, I want to appreciate the president and give him credit for being able to show up the second time after the first incident.” “I think a lot of people don’t give the president credit.” “He jokes a lot. He is a funny guy, and I think he is going to do his best to have fun tonight.” “The media is very critical of him, and sometimes he also lashes out at the media, but I think tonight he’s going to joke about the media, he’s going to joke about himself, and just try to have a good time with the media tonight.” “As you can see, over the years, his relationship has developed with the media, even some people who you think would not have a good relationship with the president, eventually have a good relationship with the president.” “For instance, the president of this organization…they didn’t have a relationship in his first administration, but today they do have a good relationship.” “So I think the president is someone who, when you get to know him, when you get closer to him, you get to understand him more.”
1:07

A C-SPAN caller just gave a perspective on President Trump that you almost never hear in the media. C-SPAN CALLER: “First of all, I want to appreciate the president and give him credit for being able to show up the second time after the first incident.” “I think a lot of people don’t give the president credit.” “He jokes a lot. He is a funny guy, and I think he is going to do his best to have fun tonight.” “The media is very critical of him, and sometimes he also lashes out at the media, but I think tonight he’s going to joke about the media, he’s going to joke about himself, and just try to have a good time with the media tonight.” “As you can see, over the years, his relationship has developed with the media, even some people who you think would not have a good relationship with the president, eventually have a good relationship with the president.” “For instance, the president of this organization…they didn’t have a relationship in his first administration, but today they do have a good relationship.” “So I think the president is someone who, when you get to know him, when you get closer to him, you get to understand him more.”

Overton

157,040 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Sinner on if there’s anything Djokovic doesn’t do as well as he used to, ‘I’m lucky to have someone like him in front of my eyes & I can hopefully learn something… I think the way he is playing and moving, if you are not professional, you don’t play at this level’ “Novak will be 39 in May. Do you think there are things he doesn’t do as well now as he used to?” Jannik: “The level he is still playing, he is I think the most professional athlete we have here in the locker room. Me as a 24 year old, I am lucky to have someone like him in front of my eyes and I can hopefully learn something. I feel like every day and every time he plays I can learn something about him, about Carlos, about all the other great, great players. I think the way he is playing and moving, if you are not professional, you don’t play at this level. He is an inspiration for all of us, especially young players.” (via Australian Open Press)
1:28

Sinner on if there’s anything Djokovic doesn’t do as well as he used to, ‘I’m lucky to have someone like him in front of my eyes & I can hopefully learn something… I think the way he is playing and moving, if you are not professional, you don’t play at this level’ “Novak will be 39 in May. Do you think there are things he doesn’t do as well now as he used to?” Jannik: “The level he is still playing, he is I think the most professional athlete we have here in the locker room. Me as a 24 year old, I am lucky to have someone like him in front of my eyes and I can hopefully learn something. I feel like every day and every time he plays I can learn something about him, about Carlos, about all the other great, great players. I think the way he is playing and moving, if you are not professional, you don’t play at this level. He is an inspiration for all of us, especially young players.” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

261,671 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."
8:25

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."

Eric Daugherty

967,602 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Albanese tells the press that he wants people to engage and talk to each other like he did at the start of his political career. What exactly does he think it is that people do on social media?! He then goes on to reveal the real reason for the current attack on social media which is that people have anonymity! The government doesn’t know who you are and they don’t like it! By the way…. Is he drunk??
1:39

Albanese tells the press that he wants people to engage and talk to each other like he did at the start of his political career. What exactly does he think it is that people do on social media?! He then goes on to reveal the real reason for the current attack on social media which is that people have anonymity! The government doesn’t know who you are and they don’t like it! By the way…. Is he drunk??

Miss Madeleine

267,357 просмотров • 1 год назад

NEW: President Trump brags even if he disagrees with the Pope, his brother is "MAGA all the way": "I have nothing against the Pope. His brother is MAGA all the way. I like his brother, Louis." REPORTER: "But why are you fighting with him?" PRESIDENT TRUMP: "I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran can have a nuclear weapon. I say Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon." "I have a right to disagree with the Pope."
0:35

NEW: President Trump brags even if he disagrees with the Pope, his brother is "MAGA all the way": "I have nothing against the Pope. His brother is MAGA all the way. I like his brother, Louis." REPORTER: "But why are you fighting with him?" PRESIDENT TRUMP: "I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran can have a nuclear weapon. I say Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon." "I have a right to disagree with the Pope."

Fox News

1,128,018 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

CNN’s Abby Phillip interrupts former Iranian political prisoner Kian Tajbakhsh and immediately cuts to a commercial right after he said this: “You can draw a straight line from the 2015 nuclear deal to October 7th.” TAJBAKHSH: “What happened with President Obama, I’ll just say this very quickly.” “And I was in the State Department in the 2000s when we implored the Bush administration not to restrict the engagement with Iran simply to the nuclear file.” “What happened with president Obama is that, for better or worse — and I’m not going to litigate that here — he decided that given the four big problems that have always been on American objectives with Iran, that is enrichment, ballistic missiles, proxies and democracy inside Iran, that he would put all the last three aside and focus only on the nuclear deal.” “Now, I’m not going to say that was good or bad. I don’t think it was a great idea, but what we have seen and this is also maybe controversial and I think a lot of my liberal friends are going to hate me for this…” “Is that unfortunately you can draw a straight line from the 2015 nuclear deal to October 7th.” “I think that what the Trump administration is—” PHILLIP: “We…we…we do have to go to a break here.” TAJBAKHSH: “Okay.” PHILLIP: “There’s more on the other side. So hold your thought because I have some follow up questions for you about what the endgame is here and now…”
1:32

CNN’s Abby Phillip interrupts former Iranian political prisoner Kian Tajbakhsh and immediately cuts to a commercial right after he said this: “You can draw a straight line from the 2015 nuclear deal to October 7th.” TAJBAKHSH: “What happened with President Obama, I’ll just say this very quickly.” “And I was in the State Department in the 2000s when we implored the Bush administration not to restrict the engagement with Iran simply to the nuclear file.” “What happened with president Obama is that, for better or worse — and I’m not going to litigate that here — he decided that given the four big problems that have always been on American objectives with Iran, that is enrichment, ballistic missiles, proxies and democracy inside Iran, that he would put all the last three aside and focus only on the nuclear deal.” “Now, I’m not going to say that was good or bad. I don’t think it was a great idea, but what we have seen and this is also maybe controversial and I think a lot of my liberal friends are going to hate me for this…” “Is that unfortunately you can draw a straight line from the 2015 nuclear deal to October 7th.” “I think that what the Trump administration is—” PHILLIP: “We…we…we do have to go to a break here.” TAJBAKHSH: “Okay.” PHILLIP: “There’s more on the other side. So hold your thought because I have some follow up questions for you about what the endgame is here and now…”

Overton

651,427 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

China’s Military Just Lost Its Last Real Generals and PLA"s Military Command Is Imploding in Real Time. How I Knew China’s Top General Was Finished — Before the CCP Admitted It. And Why the Taiwan Strait Just Got Safer. Days ago, I asked a simple question: Where is Zhang Youxia? I was mocked as a rumor-monger. Today, Beijing confirmed it: China’s top general is finished. This video breaks down how the disappearance of Zhang Youxia signaled a political earthquake inside the PLA, why Xi Jinping’s latest purge has hollowed out China’s military command, and why this internal chaos actually makes a Taiwan war less likely in the near term. This isn’t about coups or speculation. It’s about how power really works in authoritarian systems.
10:38

China’s Military Just Lost Its Last Real Generals and PLA"s Military Command Is Imploding in Real Time. How I Knew China’s Top General Was Finished — Before the CCP Admitted It. And Why the Taiwan Strait Just Got Safer. Days ago, I asked a simple question: Where is Zhang Youxia? I was mocked as a rumor-monger. Today, Beijing confirmed it: China’s top general is finished. This video breaks down how the disappearance of Zhang Youxia signaled a political earthquake inside the PLA, why Xi Jinping’s latest purge has hollowed out China’s military command, and why this internal chaos actually makes a Taiwan war less likely in the near term. This isn’t about coups or speculation. It’s about how power really works in authoritarian systems.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

327,594 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Bill O’Reilly just laid out President Trump’s high-stakes endgame on Iran — and it all begins with his visit to China this week. There is a MAJOR deal is in the works. He told Chris Cuomo this is the biggest gamble Trump has ever taken, but if it works, the payoff for the midterms will be HISTORIC. O’REILLY: “So President Trump is gambling that he can turn it around and that all the prices will come down quickly if he can negate the Iranian government.” “So he goes to China, he asks China for help. This is not going to be made public, of course. Okay.” “China will say either yes or no. But it’s in China’s best interests because if you know anything about the country with a value above all else is order.” “They don’t want disorder. It’s bad for business. They don’t want Hormuz. They don’t want any of this.” “And I understand President Trump is going to offer China an alternative oil buying. So they’ll be able to buy from the United States rather than Iran.” “But there was a reason 16 CEOs went on this trip and that is to negotiate the beginnings of a major MAJOR trade deal with the United States.” “That’s why they were on the plane.” “But anyway, what we’re looking at here is another gamble by the biggest presidential gambler of all time, Donald Trump.” “If he wins and the Iranians do pull back and the economy does, you know, explode in a positive way, that’s going mean a lot in the midterms.”
1:49

Bill O’Reilly just laid out President Trump’s high-stakes endgame on Iran — and it all begins with his visit to China this week. There is a MAJOR deal is in the works. He told Chris Cuomo this is the biggest gamble Trump has ever taken, but if it works, the payoff for the midterms will be HISTORIC. O’REILLY: “So President Trump is gambling that he can turn it around and that all the prices will come down quickly if he can negate the Iranian government.” “So he goes to China, he asks China for help. This is not going to be made public, of course. Okay.” “China will say either yes or no. But it’s in China’s best interests because if you know anything about the country with a value above all else is order.” “They don’t want disorder. It’s bad for business. They don’t want Hormuz. They don’t want any of this.” “And I understand President Trump is going to offer China an alternative oil buying. So they’ll be able to buy from the United States rather than Iran.” “But there was a reason 16 CEOs went on this trip and that is to negotiate the beginnings of a major MAJOR trade deal with the United States.” “That’s why they were on the plane.” “But anyway, what we’re looking at here is another gamble by the biggest presidential gambler of all time, Donald Trump.” “If he wins and the Iranians do pull back and the economy does, you know, explode in a positive way, that’s going mean a lot in the midterms.”

Overton

162,002 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

CNN's Fareed Zakaria on Trump bombing Iran: " It is extraordinary. I think trump has managed to do something that he, to be fair to him, had always marked out, which was he did not want Iran to have a nuclear program, but what's clear is in the last few weeks, he shifted ground on two issues. The first was he had started out in a position which was Iran can have some enrichment, just has to be monitored, things like that. He moved to what was essentially the Israeli position, which was zero enrichment, and he and he outlined that in the middle of about two weeks ago, the second is that he seemed to have lost faith that the Iranians were negotiating in, in earnest and he got -- he seems to have gotten frustrated because I think this was not his first option. His first option was a deal with the Iranians, but the maximalist condition he placed was zero enrichment was was one the Iranians didn't seem willing to go to and he was I think he thought the Iranians were not negotiating earnestly, so the result is you have you have this extraordinary move, which almost certainly has destroyed almost all of Iran's enrichment. The question, however, is you still need diplomacy. You still need a political solution, because the Iranians can rebuild."
2:33

CNN's Fareed Zakaria on Trump bombing Iran: " It is extraordinary. I think trump has managed to do something that he, to be fair to him, had always marked out, which was he did not want Iran to have a nuclear program, but what's clear is in the last few weeks, he shifted ground on two issues. The first was he had started out in a position which was Iran can have some enrichment, just has to be monitored, things like that. He moved to what was essentially the Israeli position, which was zero enrichment, and he and he outlined that in the middle of about two weeks ago, the second is that he seemed to have lost faith that the Iranians were negotiating in, in earnest and he got -- he seems to have gotten frustrated because I think this was not his first option. His first option was a deal with the Iranians, but the maximalist condition he placed was zero enrichment was was one the Iranians didn't seem willing to go to and he was I think he thought the Iranians were not negotiating earnestly, so the result is you have you have this extraordinary move, which almost certainly has destroyed almost all of Iran's enrichment. The question, however, is you still need diplomacy. You still need a political solution, because the Iranians can rebuild."

Curtis Houck

1,557,343 просмотров • 1 год назад

I asked President Trump why he's fighting with the Pope. Trump: "I have to do what's right. The Pope has to understand that. Very simple, I have nothing against the Pope. His brother is MAGA all the way..." So why are you fighting with him? Trump: "I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran can have a nuclear weapon." He didn't say that.
0:37

I asked President Trump why he's fighting with the Pope. Trump: "I have to do what's right. The Pope has to understand that. Very simple, I have nothing against the Pope. His brother is MAGA all the way..." So why are you fighting with him? Trump: "I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran can have a nuclear weapon." He didn't say that.

Kaitlan Collins

802,359 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 INTERVIEW: “XI HAS LOST CONTROL OF THE MILITARY - POWER IS SHIFTING TO ZHANG YOUXIA” “The military commander would still have the final say, but in a regular sort of setting, usually the political commissar is the one that's more in control. The PLA is not the Chinese military, it is the People's Liberation Army, which is the CCP's military. My current belief is that Xi Jinping's situation is that he has lost the control of the military and that people who are against Xi are clawing back power through Zhang Youxia.”
4:06

🚨🇨🇳 INTERVIEW: “XI HAS LOST CONTROL OF THE MILITARY - POWER IS SHIFTING TO ZHANG YOUXIA” “The military commander would still have the final say, but in a regular sort of setting, usually the political commissar is the one that's more in control. The PLA is not the Chinese military, it is the People's Liberation Army, which is the CCP's military. My current belief is that Xi Jinping's situation is that he has lost the control of the military and that people who are against Xi are clawing back power through Zhang Youxia.”

Mario Nawfal

414,959 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP on his back and forth with Pope Leo XIV "I have to do what's right. The Pope has to understand that very simple. I have nothing against the Pope. His brother's MAGA all the way. I like his brother Lewis. I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran CAN have a nuclear weapon. I say Iran CANNOT have a nuclear weapon. The Pope has to understand Iran has kiIIed more than 42,000 people over the last few months. Think of it, protesters without guns, without anything. They were totally unarmed protesters. The Pope has to understand that this is the REAL world. It's a nasty world, but as far as the Pope and saying what he wants, he can do that now."
1:45

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP on his back and forth with Pope Leo XIV "I have to do what's right. The Pope has to understand that very simple. I have nothing against the Pope. His brother's MAGA all the way. I like his brother Lewis. I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran CAN have a nuclear weapon. I say Iran CANNOT have a nuclear weapon. The Pope has to understand Iran has kiIIed more than 42,000 people over the last few months. Think of it, protesters without guns, without anything. They were totally unarmed protesters. The Pope has to understand that this is the REAL world. It's a nasty world, but as far as the Pope and saying what he wants, he can do that now."

Nick Sortor

98,622 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST NAILED IT: "The Pope has to understand that — it's very simple. I have nothing against the Pope." "I have to do WHAT'S RIGHT." "His brother is MAGA all the way!" "I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran can have a nuclear weapon." "I say Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. And if the Pope looked at the 42,000 people that were killed over the last two or three months as a protester with no weapons, no nothing — I mean, you take a look at that. So I can disagree with the Pope. I have a right to disagree."
0:36

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST NAILED IT: "The Pope has to understand that — it's very simple. I have nothing against the Pope." "I have to do WHAT'S RIGHT." "His brother is MAGA all the way!" "I'm not fighting with him. The Pope made a statement. He says Iran can have a nuclear weapon." "I say Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. And if the Pope looked at the 42,000 people that were killed over the last two or three months as a protester with no weapons, no nothing — I mean, you take a look at that. So I can disagree with the Pope. I have a right to disagree."

Eric Daugherty

1,497,456 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Trump’s media company merging with a nuclear fusion company is a much bigger deal than you think. CEO Devin Nunes calls the project “Manhattan Project 2.0.” “There’s nothing more important than making this work.” Nunes just broke down why this is such a big deal: “We just released plans that we’re merging with TAE.” “The first commercial reactor will be about 50 megawatt, but the second reactor … would be somewhere in that 350 to 500 megawatt range.” “The big nuclear fusion reactors are around a thousand.” “Most of the coal or gas plants are in that two to five hundred range.” “So, TAE working with us, building these reactors—obviously this has never been done before, so there’s a lot to be done.” “You can have all the AI, all the technology you want, but if you don’t have the power, it doesn’t matter.” “The only competition, in my mind, for our future company is China.” “The Chinese have put untold billions into this, and they know that it’s now going to be possible to have a nuclear fusion reactor that works.” “We’re really racing against the clock against China.”
3:36

Trump’s media company merging with a nuclear fusion company is a much bigger deal than you think. CEO Devin Nunes calls the project “Manhattan Project 2.0.” “There’s nothing more important than making this work.” Nunes just broke down why this is such a big deal: “We just released plans that we’re merging with TAE.” “The first commercial reactor will be about 50 megawatt, but the second reactor … would be somewhere in that 350 to 500 megawatt range.” “The big nuclear fusion reactors are around a thousand.” “Most of the coal or gas plants are in that two to five hundred range.” “So, TAE working with us, building these reactors—obviously this has never been done before, so there’s a lot to be done.” “You can have all the AI, all the technology you want, but if you don’t have the power, it doesn’t matter.” “The only competition, in my mind, for our future company is China.” “The Chinese have put untold billions into this, and they know that it’s now going to be possible to have a nuclear fusion reactor that works.” “We’re really racing against the clock against China.”

Jan Jekielek

24,615 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад