Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

THEORY: Thor didn't test Steve's worthiness... STEVE was testing Thor's! 🔨⚡ Everyone assumes Thor gave Mjolnir to Steve to verify if Steve was real. But what if it’s the exact opposite? What if the Thor we see in that scene isn't Earth-616 Thor, but a broken, corrupted, or unworthy...

SoodSaab11's profile picture

Sood Saab

2,269 subscribers

647,793 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

KunstWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

DOOM CATCHING THOR LIKE IT’S NOTHING… AND STEVE ROGERS STEPPING IN?! 🔥 Doctor Doom casually overpowering Thor would be an insane way to show just how dangerous Victor Von Doom really is. But then Steve Rogers steps forward. Seeing Captain America stand between Doom and Thor would instantly turn the moment into one of the most intense confrontations in ‘AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY’. Doom vs Thor. Doom vs Captain America. And with Doom seemingly treating Thor’s strength like it’s nothing… the Avengers may have a serious problem. ‘AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY’ might actually break the internet. 🔥 #AvengersDoomsday #DoctorDoom
0:11

DOOM CATCHING THOR LIKE IT’S NOTHING… AND STEVE ROGERS STEPPING IN?! 🔥 Doctor Doom casually overpowering Thor would be an insane way to show just how dangerous Victor Von Doom really is. But then Steve Rogers steps forward. Seeing Captain America stand between Doom and Thor would instantly turn the moment into one of the most intense confrontations in ‘AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY’. Doom vs Thor. Doom vs Captain America. And with Doom seemingly treating Thor’s strength like it’s nothing… the Avengers may have a serious problem. ‘AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY’ might actually break the internet. 🔥 #AvengersDoomsday #DoctorDoom

Ashish Kumar

329,458 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Steve Rogers teaser was filmed after he already met Doctor Doom. Here is why? — The teaser shows Steve at a peggy's house older, holding his baby. Living the life he always wanted. — Everyone assumed it was showing us the beginning of his Doomsday story. — But the CinemaCon trailer just confirmed something Steve appears in Doomsday in civilian clothes. No suit. No shield. — So here is the question if Steve is in civilian clothes during the main film, when exactly does he suit up? — Theory the teaser isn't the beginning of Steve's story. It's the middle of it. — Steve has already encountered Doom by the time that teaser was filmed. — Something happened. Bad enough that he left his family and came back. — And he came back for one thing the suit. — A man who chose peace for the first time in his life doesn't walk back into a war without a reason. — Doom gave him that reason. — The civilian clothes in the CinemaCon trailer are a timeline marker. — Before the suit Steve is just a man processing what Doom showed him. — After the suit the MCU gets something it hasn't seen since 2019. — The teaser wasn't an introduction. — It was the calm before Steve made his decision.
0:16

The Steve Rogers teaser was filmed after he already met Doctor Doom. Here is why? — The teaser shows Steve at a peggy's house older, holding his baby. Living the life he always wanted. — Everyone assumed it was showing us the beginning of his Doomsday story. — But the CinemaCon trailer just confirmed something Steve appears in Doomsday in civilian clothes. No suit. No shield. — So here is the question if Steve is in civilian clothes during the main film, when exactly does he suit up? — Theory the teaser isn't the beginning of Steve's story. It's the middle of it. — Steve has already encountered Doom by the time that teaser was filmed. — Something happened. Bad enough that he left his family and came back. — And he came back for one thing the suit. — A man who chose peace for the first time in his life doesn't walk back into a war without a reason. — Doom gave him that reason. — The civilian clothes in the CinemaCon trailer are a timeline marker. — Before the suit Steve is just a man processing what Doom showed him. — After the suit the MCU gets something it hasn't seen since 2019. — The teaser wasn't an introduction. — It was the calm before Steve made his decision.

Earth 616

206,732 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨AAKASH CHOPRA BLASTS UMPIRE STEVE BUCKNOR🤯 Aakash Chopra said :🗣️ "The man actually took pleasure in telling me that he gave me out. It was the second Test match in Lahore, 2004. I got an inside edge off Shoaib's ball. My place was hanging in the balance because Saurav was coming back, he had already said Yuvraj Singh is going to open, but my second inning was not done yet, so I could still score runs & save my place. I got an inside edge, and the ball hit the pad. He gave it out. I was distraught. There was no DRS back then. It was a very important knock as I was 100 percent going to get dropped in Rawalpindi if I didn't score. He further added : Then, Steve Bucknor met me at the reception of the hotel. He was standing next to me & telling the receptionist, I gave him out. Why are you so proud of that? There was an inside edge. Now what is this? He was crazy. He was always against India. There was a Test match in Sydney where we actually said, Let's send a pillow to his room because he was sleeping. We should have won that Test match. He didn't give out when Justin Langer was hit on the pad in front of the middle. Just take the pillow if you want to sleep.
0:12

🚨AAKASH CHOPRA BLASTS UMPIRE STEVE BUCKNOR🤯 Aakash Chopra said :🗣️ "The man actually took pleasure in telling me that he gave me out. It was the second Test match in Lahore, 2004. I got an inside edge off Shoaib's ball. My place was hanging in the balance because Saurav was coming back, he had already said Yuvraj Singh is going to open, but my second inning was not done yet, so I could still score runs & save my place. I got an inside edge, and the ball hit the pad. He gave it out. I was distraught. There was no DRS back then. It was a very important knock as I was 100 percent going to get dropped in Rawalpindi if I didn't score. He further added : Then, Steve Bucknor met me at the reception of the hotel. He was standing next to me & telling the receptionist, I gave him out. Why are you so proud of that? There was an inside edge. Now what is this? He was crazy. He was always against India. There was a Test match in Sydney where we actually said, Let's send a pillow to his room because he was sleeping. We should have won that Test match. He didn't give out when Justin Langer was hit on the pad in front of the middle. Just take the pillow if you want to sleep.

Akshat

67,834 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The 1994 NFL MVP: Steve Young 30 years ago, Steve Young delivered what many consider as one of the greatest seasons in QB history, earning his second MVP in three years, and the fifth MVP for the 49ers franchise, which was the most of any franchise at that point. Young had himself a generational campaign, with a passer rating of 112.8 (an NFL record at the time), 324 out of 461 completions, 3,969 yards, and 35 touchdowns. But Steve Young could run the ball, too. His 293 rushing yards that season were the most of any quarterback in the league, as were his 7 rushing touchdowns, and perhaps most impressively, Young fumbled only 4 times. Young was not only the best passer in the league, he was also the best running quarterback. In that era, this was an extraordinarily lethal and rare combination. In the Super Bowl, he threw six touchdown passes in a 24-for-36 performance against the San Diego Chargers, leading San Francisco to a 49–26 championship victory. On the 75th anniversary of this iconic 1994 season, a year where throwback uniforms were celebrated by the NFL and a special anniversary logo patch was worn, we’ve brought back the Authentic 49ers ‘94 uniform. Staying tuned to the finer details that make all the difference, our Authentics feature the same ‘HAY’ letters that was embroidered into each patch that year. This was done to pay homage to Ralph Hay, who was incredibly influential in bringing teams together to create a more structured professional football league.
0:15

The 1994 NFL MVP: Steve Young 30 years ago, Steve Young delivered what many consider as one of the greatest seasons in QB history, earning his second MVP in three years, and the fifth MVP for the 49ers franchise, which was the most of any franchise at that point. Young had himself a generational campaign, with a passer rating of 112.8 (an NFL record at the time), 324 out of 461 completions, 3,969 yards, and 35 touchdowns. But Steve Young could run the ball, too. His 293 rushing yards that season were the most of any quarterback in the league, as were his 7 rushing touchdowns, and perhaps most impressively, Young fumbled only 4 times. Young was not only the best passer in the league, he was also the best running quarterback. In that era, this was an extraordinarily lethal and rare combination. In the Super Bowl, he threw six touchdown passes in a 24-for-36 performance against the San Diego Chargers, leading San Francisco to a 49–26 championship victory. On the 75th anniversary of this iconic 1994 season, a year where throwback uniforms were celebrated by the NFL and a special anniversary logo patch was worn, we’ve brought back the Authentic 49ers ‘94 uniform. Staying tuned to the finer details that make all the difference, our Authentics feature the same ‘HAY’ letters that was embroidered into each patch that year. This was done to pay homage to Ralph Hay, who was incredibly influential in bringing teams together to create a more structured professional football league.

Mitchell & Ness

72,462 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Who believes that 50 years ago, this complex craft constructed from deck chairs, tin foil & curtain poles touched down & lifted off again from the moons surface? When these alleged astronauts weren’t busy chatting to the President who rang them from his landline, they were creating the necessary infrastructure to allow for lift off from the moons atmosphere - what’s more amazing is that they were able to set the camera up, timed & tilted to record & capture the blast off. Not quite sure how they recovered the camera footage, I’d say it streamed directly to their mobile, but mobiles didn’t exist in 1969. Anyway it would be nice if they went back one day but NASA says they’ve lost the technology 50years on & it’s too expensive or what’s the point? In my opinion it’s wonderful fairytale for adults - but what do I know?
0:12

Who believes that 50 years ago, this complex craft constructed from deck chairs, tin foil & curtain poles touched down & lifted off again from the moons surface? When these alleged astronauts weren’t busy chatting to the President who rang them from his landline, they were creating the necessary infrastructure to allow for lift off from the moons atmosphere - what’s more amazing is that they were able to set the camera up, timed & tilted to record & capture the blast off. Not quite sure how they recovered the camera footage, I’d say it streamed directly to their mobile, but mobiles didn’t exist in 1969. Anyway it would be nice if they went back one day but NASA says they’ve lost the technology 50years on & it’s too expensive or what’s the point? In my opinion it’s wonderful fairytale for adults - but what do I know?

Concerned Citizen

789,083 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Nobody comes into my office and says they've been losing ground for years. They come in for a knee or a shoulder. But when you ask the right questions, a different story emerges. They stopped hiking because it got too hard. They gave up tennis. They hesitate before the stairs they used to take without thinking. They've quietly rearranged their lives around what they can no longer do... and most of them didn't notice it happening. This is what I think of as the narrowing of people's lives. It's not a dramatic event. Instead, it's a gradual shrinking of what's physically possible, so slow that people mistake the adaptation for a choice. It wasn't a choice. It was the slow, quiet disappearance of capacity that nobody warned them to protect. They normalized all the changes and attributed them solely to aging. The narrowing is not inevitable!! Dammit... it's not ;-)! But it requires intention to resist because the body will not hold the capacity to do things you do not train, and the losses accumulate in silence until they don't.
0:11

Nobody comes into my office and says they've been losing ground for years. They come in for a knee or a shoulder. But when you ask the right questions, a different story emerges. They stopped hiking because it got too hard. They gave up tennis. They hesitate before the stairs they used to take without thinking. They've quietly rearranged their lives around what they can no longer do... and most of them didn't notice it happening. This is what I think of as the narrowing of people's lives. It's not a dramatic event. Instead, it's a gradual shrinking of what's physically possible, so slow that people mistake the adaptation for a choice. It wasn't a choice. It was the slow, quiet disappearance of capacity that nobody warned them to protect. They normalized all the changes and attributed them solely to aging. The narrowing is not inevitable!! Dammit... it's not ;-)! But it requires intention to resist because the body will not hold the capacity to do things you do not train, and the losses accumulate in silence until they don't.

Howard Luks MD

76,983 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Last night on the @fourensicroom, we broke down what happened on Sunday, September 17, 2023, at 8 a.m.—when Karen Read and Alan Jackson sat in a blacked-out SUV while a “private investigator” knocked on Brian Higgins’ door to “talk,” if he was willing. His response: “Not Interested.” 👉Higgins had legal representation—If you are represented, the defense must go through your attorney. 👉If you have counsel, defense attorneys cannot bypass your lawyer. 👉This is governed by ethical rules (Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct Why did they not go through his lawyer? And if we’re supposed to believe he killed John O’Keefe, why approach him at his home at all? Where’s the fear? Why try to sit down with him? Why Higgins—and not the McCabes or the Alberts? Why a non-family member? This was before they retooled their story. Before Aidan Kearney started targeting Higgins. Back when they were trying to see if he’d play ball and point the finger at the “McAlberts.” So why did he suddenly become one of the alleged “killers” only after he declined to talk? We all know, Steve. Link to last nights show: Link to donate to the Witnesses Defense Fund:
0:11

Last night on the @fourensicroom, we broke down what happened on Sunday, September 17, 2023, at 8 a.m.—when Karen Read and Alan Jackson sat in a blacked-out SUV while a “private investigator” knocked on Brian Higgins’ door to “talk,” if he was willing. His response: “Not Interested.” 👉Higgins had legal representation—If you are represented, the defense must go through your attorney. 👉If you have counsel, defense attorneys cannot bypass your lawyer. 👉This is governed by ethical rules (Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct Why did they not go through his lawyer? And if we’re supposed to believe he killed John O’Keefe, why approach him at his home at all? Where’s the fear? Why try to sit down with him? Why Higgins—and not the McCabes or the Alberts? Why a non-family member? This was before they retooled their story. Before Aidan Kearney started targeting Higgins. Back when they were trying to see if he’d play ball and point the finger at the “McAlberts.” So why did he suddenly become one of the alleged “killers” only after he declined to talk? We all know, Steve. Link to last nights show: Link to donate to the Witnesses Defense Fund:

Mama Llama

26,619 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This airline passenger filmed this guy sitting in front of them. The guy in front keeps slamming his chair back even though it is already reclined. Eventually the guy with the knees does push back but why does this even happen? What is that guy in front doing? Many said they think that airlines shouldn’t even have reclining seats unless you are in first class because there isn’t enough room. Others said they will ask the person behind them if it is okay to recline their seat. What would you do if someone was doing this in front of you? Has this ever happened to you? And, do you think it’s okay for people to just recline or should they warn the people behind them first? And do you agree and think they should get rid of reclining seats all together?
0:19

This airline passenger filmed this guy sitting in front of them. The guy in front keeps slamming his chair back even though it is already reclined. Eventually the guy with the knees does push back but why does this even happen? What is that guy in front doing? Many said they think that airlines shouldn’t even have reclining seats unless you are in first class because there isn’t enough room. Others said they will ask the person behind them if it is okay to recline their seat. What would you do if someone was doing this in front of you? Has this ever happened to you? And, do you think it’s okay for people to just recline or should they warn the people behind them first? And do you agree and think they should get rid of reclining seats all together?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

70,138 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Snapshot of something Mike Vrabel expressed frustration with this morning: He sees Hunter Henry (bottom of screen) trying to communicate with the official 15 yards away/do the right thing alignment-wise … and still get penalized. “I’ll have to try to get some clarification on that — how we are going to do this going forward,” Vrabel says. Earlier today, in his radio interview, Vrabel shared that he was irked with over-officiating at the line of scrimmage. “If our guys are going to look over; I get that we have to be legal. But for as long as I can remember in this league, the refs are going to try to officiate proactively and work with the players. “If it’s a hold, call a hold. If it’s defensive pass interference, call defensive pass interference. But at the line of scrimmage, if players are going to try to get the formation correct … we’re not going to tell them that they are either on the line of scrimmage or they have them off? They’re just going to sit there and tap their knee? “I don’t know what that is. That’s frustrating that we are that literal as an officiating department — if that is indeed what they are telling them. … “I didn’t know when we were going to start officiating the line of scrimmage and not communicate with our players. Because in the end, the relationship the players have with officials, I think can be really positive and they can explain the mechanics they’re looking for.”
0:10

Snapshot of something Mike Vrabel expressed frustration with this morning: He sees Hunter Henry (bottom of screen) trying to communicate with the official 15 yards away/do the right thing alignment-wise … and still get penalized. “I’ll have to try to get some clarification on that — how we are going to do this going forward,” Vrabel says. Earlier today, in his radio interview, Vrabel shared that he was irked with over-officiating at the line of scrimmage. “If our guys are going to look over; I get that we have to be legal. But for as long as I can remember in this league, the refs are going to try to officiate proactively and work with the players. “If it’s a hold, call a hold. If it’s defensive pass interference, call defensive pass interference. But at the line of scrimmage, if players are going to try to get the formation correct … we’re not going to tell them that they are either on the line of scrimmage or they have them off? They’re just going to sit there and tap their knee? “I don’t know what that is. That’s frustrating that we are that literal as an officiating department — if that is indeed what they are telling them. … “I didn’t know when we were going to start officiating the line of scrimmage and not communicate with our players. Because in the end, the relationship the players have with officials, I think can be really positive and they can explain the mechanics they’re looking for.”

Mike Reiss

474,637 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Nancy Guthrie To be clear, what is Most interesting about Porch Guy using the fresh vines he pulled to assist him with removing the Nest Camera shows his Inexperience with: 1-Wearing what appears to be double layered gloves meaning, Porch Guy did not realize how double layered gloves would affect his ability to grip and do the job at hand. He knew they would protect his DNA . He didn't know they would impede his ability to remove that camera because he had never removed a camera with gloved hand before. 2-Removing Nest cameras from mounts. If he had experience, he would have realized how difficult it would be to grip and pull from the bracket. Porch Guy planned and prepared, but this abduction was his first rodeo. Many of us in LE surmised this from the beginning based on his actions. This supports that conclusion. This isn't to say his planning didn't pay off. It did. But I am convinced now more that ever that he was a smart rookie having never committed a crime like this before. Why did he Hate Nancy and the Guthrie family so much? #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieKidnapping
0:13

Nancy Guthrie To be clear, what is Most interesting about Porch Guy using the fresh vines he pulled to assist him with removing the Nest Camera shows his Inexperience with: 1-Wearing what appears to be double layered gloves meaning, Porch Guy did not realize how double layered gloves would affect his ability to grip and do the job at hand. He knew they would protect his DNA . He didn't know they would impede his ability to remove that camera because he had never removed a camera with gloved hand before. 2-Removing Nest cameras from mounts. If he had experience, he would have realized how difficult it would be to grip and pull from the bracket. Porch Guy planned and prepared, but this abduction was his first rodeo. Many of us in LE surmised this from the beginning based on his actions. This supports that conclusion. This isn't to say his planning didn't pay off. It did. But I am convinced now more that ever that he was a smart rookie having never committed a crime like this before. Why did he Hate Nancy and the Guthrie family so much? #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieKidnapping

Jennifer Coffindaffer

12,534 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Christina Chang talked to Glamour about how Connor really ate the pasta during the dinner table scene on episode 6 of Heated Rivalry. "Sitting across from him…it was outrageous. It was Connor’s idea to eat like that, and he made a great choice. And you’re right, it does showcase his comedic abilities because he’s not winking at it in any way. He’s literally shoveling food into his mouth, but he understood it’s nuanced, and that in this totally serious scene while his boyfriend’s about to break down, he’s just like, Oh God, look at the family drama; it’s amazing. He did say to Jacob, 'You never see anybody eat in a scene. I’m going to eat in the scene.' Meanwhile, I always put something in my mouth and then it’s time for me to speak. So I’m always like, Ugh. But in that scene, when the cameras were on them, we couldn’t get through several takes. You can hear everybody laughing because Connor would have noodles hanging out of his mouth. So at some point, Jacob was like, 'Okay, we need to cut. This is outrageous. We can’t even understand what you’re saying between the spaghetti and your accent. Let’s start over.'" 🔗 Read the full interview here:
0:12

Christina Chang talked to Glamour about how Connor really ate the pasta during the dinner table scene on episode 6 of Heated Rivalry. "Sitting across from him…it was outrageous. It was Connor’s idea to eat like that, and he made a great choice. And you’re right, it does showcase his comedic abilities because he’s not winking at it in any way. He’s literally shoveling food into his mouth, but he understood it’s nuanced, and that in this totally serious scene while his boyfriend’s about to break down, he’s just like, Oh God, look at the family drama; it’s amazing. He did say to Jacob, 'You never see anybody eat in a scene. I’m going to eat in the scene.' Meanwhile, I always put something in my mouth and then it’s time for me to speak. So I’m always like, Ugh. But in that scene, when the cameras were on them, we couldn’t get through several takes. You can hear everybody laughing because Connor would have noodles hanging out of his mouth. So at some point, Jacob was like, 'Okay, we need to cut. This is outrageous. We can’t even understand what you’re saying between the spaghetti and your accent. Let’s start over.'" 🔗 Read the full interview here:

Connor Storrie Updates

1,315,224 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

WHAT DID YOU DO THIS BANK HOLIDAY WEEKEND? Devastatingly, #ExcludedUK lost our 38th member to suicide over not being able to afford the Bounce Back Loan that 90% of UK taxpayers did not have to take out to live. As is our policy, we never give out names, locations etc., but all MPs should sit up and take notice as this could be one of your constituents! Obviously we have sent our condolences to family, friends and their fellow excluded, but they deserve better and need you to step up and do your bit! Surely it doesn't have to be your loved one who takes their own life before you do whatever you can to raise this matter. YES! The initial issue WAS 5 years ago… but the devastation is still being felt by businesses and individuals, YOUR CONSTITUENTS, even now! 10 recent attempted suicides over Bounce Back Loan Repayments and now one successful attempt! Shame on those who could have ensured this was avoided! The right thing for MPs to do now is to join our APPG to avoid any more unnecessary deaths. Please DM us on here or email excludeduk@hotmail.com Steve Witherden MP Manuela Perteghella MP 🔶 Al Pinkerton MP Greg Smith MP Rishi Sunak
0:15

WHAT DID YOU DO THIS BANK HOLIDAY WEEKEND? Devastatingly, #ExcludedUK lost our 38th member to suicide over not being able to afford the Bounce Back Loan that 90% of UK taxpayers did not have to take out to live. As is our policy, we never give out names, locations etc., but all MPs should sit up and take notice as this could be one of your constituents! Obviously we have sent our condolences to family, friends and their fellow excluded, but they deserve better and need you to step up and do your bit! Surely it doesn't have to be your loved one who takes their own life before you do whatever you can to raise this matter. YES! The initial issue WAS 5 years ago… but the devastation is still being felt by businesses and individuals, YOUR CONSTITUENTS, even now! 10 recent attempted suicides over Bounce Back Loan Repayments and now one successful attempt! Shame on those who could have ensured this was avoided! The right thing for MPs to do now is to join our APPG to avoid any more unnecessary deaths. Please DM us on here or email [email protected] Steve Witherden MP Manuela Perteghella MP 🔶 Al Pinkerton MP Greg Smith MP Rishi Sunak

ExcludedUK Official

50,697 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

These guys can't even lie properly in a diagram. The projectile wasn't traveling in a path parallel to the floor, idiot. The shooter was 35-40 feet above the ground. The angle is somewhere between 5 and 10 degrees. The blue line is closer to the actual angle and it's ridiculously easy to see how this plausibly happened. Look at the diagram, and then watch the video. The projectile hit his spine, deflected slightly downward where it hit the back of his ribcage, pushed his entire back rearward (you can see his T-shirt move downward as his back elastically deforms), and then came to rest someplace in his upper chest cavity. If you don't think rifle bullets deflect when they hit bones, you are fucking dumb. If you think bullets don't deform and fragment and slow down CONSIDERABLY when they hit not just one bone, but two or three, you are fucking dumb. If you don't think the skin and tissue of a healthy, well hydrated male can elastically deform in exactly this manner you are fucking dumb. Would it do that 100 times out of a 100? Obviously not. WHICH NOBODY IS CLAIMING. However, idiots like you ARE claiming that it could NEVER HAPPEN. EVER. You have to be desperately stupid or simply jumping onto the "current thing" for attention. Which is it? This is a real world example of the "hot hand theory". Some of these guys were correct on COVID-19, so everyone believes they'll be right about the next thing, too.
0:13

These guys can't even lie properly in a diagram. The projectile wasn't traveling in a path parallel to the floor, idiot. The shooter was 35-40 feet above the ground. The angle is somewhere between 5 and 10 degrees. The blue line is closer to the actual angle and it's ridiculously easy to see how this plausibly happened. Look at the diagram, and then watch the video. The projectile hit his spine, deflected slightly downward where it hit the back of his ribcage, pushed his entire back rearward (you can see his T-shirt move downward as his back elastically deforms), and then came to rest someplace in his upper chest cavity. If you don't think rifle bullets deflect when they hit bones, you are fucking dumb. If you think bullets don't deform and fragment and slow down CONSIDERABLY when they hit not just one bone, but two or three, you are fucking dumb. If you don't think the skin and tissue of a healthy, well hydrated male can elastically deform in exactly this manner you are fucking dumb. Would it do that 100 times out of a 100? Obviously not. WHICH NOBODY IS CLAIMING. However, idiots like you ARE claiming that it could NEVER HAPPEN. EVER. You have to be desperately stupid or simply jumping onto the "current thing" for attention. Which is it? This is a real world example of the "hot hand theory". Some of these guys were correct on COVID-19, so everyone believes they'll be right about the next thing, too.

Fenix Ammunition

1,537,378 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I think some people are just not ready to read this, so feel free to skip🫴🏼 The thing is, you don’t want to admit that Serhat is a human too just because he’s a man. And I will stick to that sentence and repeat it as much as I can. Not to convince you, but because it’s a fact. If you ask Ercan the last 2 episodes could literally be titled: “How to emotionally break Serhat in every possible way.” If you’ve been paying attention from the beginning, you would already know how his character is built. He’s someone who was never allowed to express his emotions. Yes, he was treated “better” as the heir but what does “better” even mean here? He wasn’t protected, he was programmed. Forced to suppress everything, to carry responsibility, to stay in control at all times. And that stayed with him. And when you grow up like that, you attract people who treat you the same way. That’s exactly what happened with M. She treated him in that same controlled, restrictive way. The only person who didn’t was Yıldız. From the very beginning, she saw the real him the vulnerable him. No matter how high he built his walls, she could still see through him. And that scared him. Not because he doubts her, but because he’s not used to being seen like that. Every time someone saw even a fraction of his softness, they used it against him (Akif, Sultan, M…all of them.) Yıldız wouldn’t do that, he knows it. But that doesn’t change the fact that having someone understand you that deeply feels overwhelming. It’s human. Now, about the hospital incident and the lack of communication… Both of them are right and wrong at the same time. This isn’t about blaming one side. Some situations are just the result of circumstances, not fault. And if you actually watch the show because you care about the characters, you’ll understand that. The lack of communication from the previous episode clearly showed in the office scene this episode. Yildiz moved forward, trying to hold onto their promise to trust each other, to let their word be one. But he was still stuck in that moment. Not because he held grudge against her, but because he knows that one small action( her taking the gun) led to much bigger consequences. And they both know that. And most importantly they are exhausted! Everything started when he went to kordağli’s mansion last ep . Then M told him she would marry his enemy and give his child his name. Then his Ortak was shot, and he had to carry him to the hospital and operate on him while injured!(an injury that was caused my Aşir himself!) almost losing him. He broke down alone!! no one even saw that because this is how Serhat is used to be🙂‍↕️ Then he started suspecting his own brother. Then yilidz rose the gun in front of the other ağas and that’s when all the pressure and the responsibility of maintaining control and respect not just in his family, but as an Ağa, crushed him at once! Then Yıldız was jailed because of M & the next day it was confirmed that Akif shot Aşir and he discovered his betrayal with nida and hast to give his own brother to death! Because that’s what morally correct! And then Hicran First, she was someone he was supposed to protect cuz Aşir told him to protect her. Then suddenly, she is his sister. And just as quickly, she was dying. He found out his own mother was behind her suffering. He didn’t get time to process any of it. The guilt alone is enough to destroy someone. Knowing she was always there, part of his life, and he didn’t know. That he couldn’t protect her. That he couldn’t repay her. And it didn’t stop there… He lost his status. He was manipulated by M. He was pushed further and further. Then came the final blow Hicran’s brain death. And right after that, he had to face the reality of her being an organ donor. And then… her heart goes to her killer… Anyway, since you’re all acting like superhuman creatures and these situations wouldn’t affect you at all if you were in his place then go ahead, have at it.
0:12

I think some people are just not ready to read this, so feel free to skip🫴🏼 The thing is, you don’t want to admit that Serhat is a human too just because he’s a man. And I will stick to that sentence and repeat it as much as I can. Not to convince you, but because it’s a fact. If you ask Ercan the last 2 episodes could literally be titled: “How to emotionally break Serhat in every possible way.” If you’ve been paying attention from the beginning, you would already know how his character is built. He’s someone who was never allowed to express his emotions. Yes, he was treated “better” as the heir but what does “better” even mean here? He wasn’t protected, he was programmed. Forced to suppress everything, to carry responsibility, to stay in control at all times. And that stayed with him. And when you grow up like that, you attract people who treat you the same way. That’s exactly what happened with M. She treated him in that same controlled, restrictive way. The only person who didn’t was Yıldız. From the very beginning, she saw the real him the vulnerable him. No matter how high he built his walls, she could still see through him. And that scared him. Not because he doubts her, but because he’s not used to being seen like that. Every time someone saw even a fraction of his softness, they used it against him (Akif, Sultan, M…all of them.) Yıldız wouldn’t do that, he knows it. But that doesn’t change the fact that having someone understand you that deeply feels overwhelming. It’s human. Now, about the hospital incident and the lack of communication… Both of them are right and wrong at the same time. This isn’t about blaming one side. Some situations are just the result of circumstances, not fault. And if you actually watch the show because you care about the characters, you’ll understand that. The lack of communication from the previous episode clearly showed in the office scene this episode. Yildiz moved forward, trying to hold onto their promise to trust each other, to let their word be one. But he was still stuck in that moment. Not because he held grudge against her, but because he knows that one small action( her taking the gun) led to much bigger consequences. And they both know that. And most importantly they are exhausted! Everything started when he went to kordağli’s mansion last ep . Then M told him she would marry his enemy and give his child his name. Then his Ortak was shot, and he had to carry him to the hospital and operate on him while injured!(an injury that was caused my Aşir himself!) almost losing him. He broke down alone!! no one even saw that because this is how Serhat is used to be🙂‍↕️ Then he started suspecting his own brother. Then yilidz rose the gun in front of the other ağas and that’s when all the pressure and the responsibility of maintaining control and respect not just in his family, but as an Ağa, crushed him at once! Then Yıldız was jailed because of M & the next day it was confirmed that Akif shot Aşir and he discovered his betrayal with nida and hast to give his own brother to death! Because that’s what morally correct! And then Hicran First, she was someone he was supposed to protect cuz Aşir told him to protect her. Then suddenly, she is his sister. And just as quickly, she was dying. He found out his own mother was behind her suffering. He didn’t get time to process any of it. The guilt alone is enough to destroy someone. Knowing she was always there, part of his life, and he didn’t know. That he couldn’t protect her. That he couldn’t repay her. And it didn’t stop there… He lost his status. He was manipulated by M. He was pushed further and further. Then came the final blow Hicran’s brain death. And right after that, he had to face the reality of her being an organ donor. And then… her heart goes to her killer… Anyway, since you’re all acting like superhuman creatures and these situations wouldn’t affect you at all if you were in his place then go ahead, have at it.

Maurora🫦

15,873 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In Massachusetts, it’s no longer *triple murder of your children*. It’s “altruistic filicide”, and apparently it’s a “get out of jail free” card. It’s wild because I really was somewhere in the middle - in that if “not guilty by reason of insanity” exists as a defense, this would be one of those cases where it could understandably be applied. But listening to the mental gymnastics of these jurors… “we had to square how she could do it in such a calculated, premeditated, and deliberate manner with psychosis” (paraphrasing). Those eight jurors who did everything they could to bully the single holdout came in from the conclusion of “not guilty by reason of insanity” and did everything they could to re-interpret what they are now acknowledging was the evidence of premeditation in light of that forgone conclusion.
0:13

In Massachusetts, it’s no longer *triple murder of your children*. It’s “altruistic filicide”, and apparently it’s a “get out of jail free” card. It’s wild because I really was somewhere in the middle - in that if “not guilty by reason of insanity” exists as a defense, this would be one of those cases where it could understandably be applied. But listening to the mental gymnastics of these jurors… “we had to square how she could do it in such a calculated, premeditated, and deliberate manner with psychosis” (paraphrasing). Those eight jurors who did everything they could to bully the single holdout came in from the conclusion of “not guilty by reason of insanity” and did everything they could to re-interpret what they are now acknowledging was the evidence of premeditation in light of that forgone conclusion.

Viva Frei

21,409 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump
0:16

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Viva Frei

30,167 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

DON’T COACH THE MISTAKE. COACH THE INTENTION. ⚽️ A line to reflect on. Of course not always, but more than not often. There’s a powerful coaching lesson in something Pep Guardiola speaks about. During one difficult period for him the season before last, his approach was to demand more. Demand better. Challenge errors. Hold players accountable. But later, last season, the Pep Guardiola message evolved. As seen in this dressing room footage he told his players: It’s okay to lose the ball. It’s okay to make mistakes. There was just one condition: Make the mistake with conviction. In other words… If you’re going to attempt the pass, commit to it. If you’re going to make the decision, make it with 100% intention. Because there is a huge difference between: ❌ A mistake caused by hesitation, fear or lack of application. and ✅ A mistake that happens while a player is fully committed to doing the right thing. That distinction matters enormously for coaches. Too often we see the outcome: “He gave the ball away.” But before correcting the player, ask: What was the intention? Was the player trying to break a line? Trying to find the free player? Trying to play forward? Trying to exploit the space we’ve coached them to recognize? If the intention was right, the solution might not be changing the decision at all. The decision may be correct. The execution may simply need improving. And those require completely different coaching interventions. If we punish every mistake, eventually players stop taking responsibility. They stop experimenting. They stop seeing possibilities. They start choosing the safest option available, not necessarily the best one. QUOTE THIS FROM KEEPITONTHEDECK..... "Great environments give players freedom to fail with purpose." #pepguardiola #guardiola
0:18

DON’T COACH THE MISTAKE. COACH THE INTENTION. ⚽️ A line to reflect on. Of course not always, but more than not often. There’s a powerful coaching lesson in something Pep Guardiola speaks about. During one difficult period for him the season before last, his approach was to demand more. Demand better. Challenge errors. Hold players accountable. But later, last season, the Pep Guardiola message evolved. As seen in this dressing room footage he told his players: It’s okay to lose the ball. It’s okay to make mistakes. There was just one condition: Make the mistake with conviction. In other words… If you’re going to attempt the pass, commit to it. If you’re going to make the decision, make it with 100% intention. Because there is a huge difference between: ❌ A mistake caused by hesitation, fear or lack of application. and ✅ A mistake that happens while a player is fully committed to doing the right thing. That distinction matters enormously for coaches. Too often we see the outcome: “He gave the ball away.” But before correcting the player, ask: What was the intention? Was the player trying to break a line? Trying to find the free player? Trying to play forward? Trying to exploit the space we’ve coached them to recognize? If the intention was right, the solution might not be changing the decision at all. The decision may be correct. The execution may simply need improving. And those require completely different coaching interventions. If we punish every mistake, eventually players stop taking responsibility. They stop experimenting. They stop seeing possibilities. They start choosing the safest option available, not necessarily the best one. QUOTE THIS FROM KEEPITONTHEDECK..... "Great environments give players freedom to fail with purpose." #pepguardiola #guardiola

Keepitonthedeck

29,256 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

There is a bit of beauty to the whole Tate defeat. Hear me out. If you look at Demoor’s first professional fight below, let’s face it, it’s beyond comical. It was so bad that Demoor’s own corner threw in the towel after the 2nd round. THIS is the EXACT fight Demoor was alluding to when he said he contemplated taking his own life. He was ridiculed across social media. Laughed at and rejected my the male community. Fast forward and Demoor started listening to Andrew Tate. Demoor decided to LIVE. He started training harder. Applying himself. Refocusing. Taking everything much more seriously. After defeating Tate, he tearfully revealed that Andrew’s own words are what pulled him out of this dark place. Andrew saved his life. Demoor stepped into the ring with the man that breathed life back into his soul and won. ‘A real master trains his replacement.’ This is such a W for men across the board and it’s shocking that many men can’t see this. Both men won, and dare I say, Andrew walked away with the biggest W of them all. A TRUE Cinderella story. He who has ears.
0:17

There is a bit of beauty to the whole Tate defeat. Hear me out. If you look at Demoor’s first professional fight below, let’s face it, it’s beyond comical. It was so bad that Demoor’s own corner threw in the towel after the 2nd round. THIS is the EXACT fight Demoor was alluding to when he said he contemplated taking his own life. He was ridiculed across social media. Laughed at and rejected my the male community. Fast forward and Demoor started listening to Andrew Tate. Demoor decided to LIVE. He started training harder. Applying himself. Refocusing. Taking everything much more seriously. After defeating Tate, he tearfully revealed that Andrew’s own words are what pulled him out of this dark place. Andrew saved his life. Demoor stepped into the ring with the man that breathed life back into his soul and won. ‘A real master trains his replacement.’ This is such a W for men across the board and it’s shocking that many men can’t see this. Both men won, and dare I say, Andrew walked away with the biggest W of them all. A TRUE Cinderella story. He who has ears.

Amiri King

523,599 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten