Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Therapist Drops Bombshell Inside the Personality Disorder Accusations Against Candace Owens! "I'm getting the sensation, as I'd sit with a client, of histrionics right now, gaslighting. It's a real personality disorder." ~ Daniel Schonbuch In a recent episode of The Viktor Frankl Podcast, host Rabbi Daniel Schonbuch, a licensed...

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

31,190 subscribers

51,593 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Norman Finkelstein says Candace Owens is a not a political menace and that 70% of what Tucker Carlson says is true in his interview with Hasan "I don't consider Candace Owens a political menace..she carries around prejudices about Jews, as a I say, everybody carries around prejudices about everybody" "I think 70% of what Tucker Carlson says is true..but when he starts going off and saying that Israel is trying to destroy the US bc it wants to enter into a partnership with India, I just raise my eyes" "I'm not gonna say Tucker Carlson is an antisemite..I didn't say it with Candace Owens either" "I've noticed that ppl are very critical of what I've said about Tucker Carlson bc I'm kind of ruining the fun. The fun is everybody thinks they're so brave and courageous attacking Israel. It takes exactly zero courage right now to attack Israel, I think it takes a certain amount of courage to defend it..it has shifted quite dramatically"
3:03

Norman Finkelstein says Candace Owens is a not a political menace and that 70% of what Tucker Carlson says is true in his interview with Hasan "I don't consider Candace Owens a political menace..she carries around prejudices about Jews, as a I say, everybody carries around prejudices about everybody" "I think 70% of what Tucker Carlson says is true..but when he starts going off and saying that Israel is trying to destroy the US bc it wants to enter into a partnership with India, I just raise my eyes" "I'm not gonna say Tucker Carlson is an antisemite..I didn't say it with Candace Owens either" "I've noticed that ppl are very critical of what I've said about Tucker Carlson bc I'm kind of ruining the fun. The fun is everybody thinks they're so brave and courageous attacking Israel. It takes exactly zero courage right now to attack Israel, I think it takes a certain amount of courage to defend it..it has shifted quite dramatically"

yeet

170,238 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

Asmongold says he would not bet on Mizkif prevailing in his lawsuit against Emiru and explains why he thinks the judge approving moving forward with the lawsuit doesn't mean much "Not what I would bet on so far..it's not going to happen (an apology from Emiru in a potential settlement)" "It's bc he basically didn't define it correctly and the judge wants to have a more definitive..that's part of Emi's case and not mine, so I'm not gonna really make a lot of comments on that..to the extent that anything else comes out, I think that it will only further entrench this problem..there are a lot of things that are not public..but when they are made public, I think they'll be very revealing" "U have a lot more to go through than just like one specific thing..and there's a very very long process and something not getting thrown out immediately is like not really that big of a deal"
2:15

Asmongold says he would not bet on Mizkif prevailing in his lawsuit against Emiru and explains why he thinks the judge approving moving forward with the lawsuit doesn't mean much "Not what I would bet on so far..it's not going to happen (an apology from Emiru in a potential settlement)" "It's bc he basically didn't define it correctly and the judge wants to have a more definitive..that's part of Emi's case and not mine, so I'm not gonna really make a lot of comments on that..to the extent that anything else comes out, I think that it will only further entrench this problem..there are a lot of things that are not public..but when they are made public, I think they'll be very revealing" "U have a lot more to go through than just like one specific thing..and there's a very very long process and something not getting thrown out immediately is like not really that big of a deal"

yeet

72,938 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Even die-hard leftists are agreeing and say that Candace Owens seems to be one of the ONLY "right wing" figures close to Charlie who's posting in a way that seems GENUINELY DEVASTATED after Charlie's assassination. She's also one of the few close to Charlie who is actually looking for the TRUTH and not lying to the world, going along with all the obvious lies and deception of this cover-up operation. If your not asking questions and looking for the TRUTH, you're on the wrong team. cc: Candace Owens
1:13

Even die-hard leftists are agreeing and say that Candace Owens seems to be one of the ONLY "right wing" figures close to Charlie who's posting in a way that seems GENUINELY DEVASTATED after Charlie's assassination. She's also one of the few close to Charlie who is actually looking for the TRUTH and not lying to the world, going along with all the obvious lies and deception of this cover-up operation. If your not asking questions and looking for the TRUTH, you're on the wrong team. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

111,303 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Tucker Carlson admits he sincerely believed he could stop the war with Iran, and what being wrong taught him. This is the rare moment Tucker turns the lens on himself: CARLSON: "It's good to be reminded of how absurd you are, and how powerless you are. "I've gone through periods where I'm like, I'm going to make a big difference. I'm going to stop the war with Iran, which I sincerely believed. I thought that I could do that. I don't know why I thought that. It's embarrassing in retrospect, but I really did think that. "I'm glad I have been shorn of that illusion because it's an illusion, it's absurd. I am one guy. And even if I were a million guys, it's still a lie to tell ourselves that we're in charge of history." "The theme I took away from reading them [the Old and New Testaments], in the Hebrew text and the Christian text, is: you are not God. Just remember that. It's really hard to remember that. It sounds easy, but it's been the thing I forget most often. "You really think you're in charge, but you're not."
1:10

Tucker Carlson admits he sincerely believed he could stop the war with Iran, and what being wrong taught him. This is the rare moment Tucker turns the lens on himself: CARLSON: "It's good to be reminded of how absurd you are, and how powerless you are. "I've gone through periods where I'm like, I'm going to make a big difference. I'm going to stop the war with Iran, which I sincerely believed. I thought that I could do that. I don't know why I thought that. It's embarrassing in retrospect, but I really did think that. "I'm glad I have been shorn of that illusion because it's an illusion, it's absurd. I am one guy. And even if I were a million guys, it's still a lie to tell ourselves that we're in charge of history." "The theme I took away from reading them [the Old and New Testaments], in the Hebrew text and the Christian text, is: you are not God. Just remember that. It's really hard to remember that. It sounds easy, but it's been the thing I forget most often. "You really think you're in charge, but you're not."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

579,525 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Asmongold says he doesn’t seek mainstream validation after Hasan called him politically irrelevant and motionless "I've never called Hasan a terr*rist..I say that he is a terr*rist supporter..and he is" "Hasan is flying all around the world to collab with any political person that will happen to allow him to infect their campaign..what are u talking about I'm desperately clawing on for relevance..like I'm streaming, obviously I'm looking for relevance" "Great, I'm glad ur happy with how well ur doing on YouTube..is it literally just coping and malding about popularity?" "I have no interest in any form of mainstream validation, I've been invited to a lot of mainstream channels..I like doing what I'm doing and I'm comfortable..if he wants to go and get involved with some new political candidate that wants to make excuses for Hamas..he's totally free to do that, just not something I'm not interested in" "What do I need ops for? I'm not trying to be involved with mainstream politics..see this is the difference..reason why I don't involve myself..I know I'm extremely controversial..I don't want to pollute or complicate any sort of thing I agree with by adding in my own personal issues" "The main time that any of these ppl bring u up politically is to disavow..when Fox News..when Zohran, it's to disavow..CNN, it's to disavow..they do the same thing for Nick Fuentes..for Alex Jones..this isn't like a seal of approval" "I think he does believe in the political values he has..seems also that he uses them..as social accessories and bring its up..like it's a big deal..I don't really bring this up..I've talked to a lot of ppl that very high level..it's not a big deal"
4:58

Asmongold says he doesn’t seek mainstream validation after Hasan called him politically irrelevant and motionless "I've never called Hasan a terr*rist..I say that he is a terr*rist supporter..and he is" "Hasan is flying all around the world to collab with any political person that will happen to allow him to infect their campaign..what are u talking about I'm desperately clawing on for relevance..like I'm streaming, obviously I'm looking for relevance" "Great, I'm glad ur happy with how well ur doing on YouTube..is it literally just coping and malding about popularity?" "I have no interest in any form of mainstream validation, I've been invited to a lot of mainstream channels..I like doing what I'm doing and I'm comfortable..if he wants to go and get involved with some new political candidate that wants to make excuses for Hamas..he's totally free to do that, just not something I'm not interested in" "What do I need ops for? I'm not trying to be involved with mainstream politics..see this is the difference..reason why I don't involve myself..I know I'm extremely controversial..I don't want to pollute or complicate any sort of thing I agree with by adding in my own personal issues" "The main time that any of these ppl bring u up politically is to disavow..when Fox News..when Zohran, it's to disavow..CNN, it's to disavow..they do the same thing for Nick Fuentes..for Alex Jones..this isn't like a seal of approval" "I think he does believe in the political values he has..seems also that he uses them..as social accessories and bring its up..like it's a big deal..I don't really bring this up..I've talked to a lot of ppl that very high level..it's not a big deal"

yeet

87,123 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Tucker Craves Influence, Candace Craves Relevance, Megyn Kelly Grabbing Low-Hanging Fruit! "For Megyn, I think it's attention and money... For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." ~Dennis Michael Lynch In a recent interview with filmmaker and commentator Dinesh D'Souza, conservative podcaster and commentator Dennis Michael Lynch shared his candid views on prominent figures he associates with the "woke right," including Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens. Lynch emphasized that their motivations stem not primarily from financial gain, but from deeper drives like power, influence, attention, and personal relevance. Lynch explained his initial reluctance to criticize Megyn Kelly, noting how significantly she boosted his career. "Megan really uh brought my career to the next level," he said. "I would go to an airport... Everybody would notice me, ask me for my autograph. I'd get speeches. I'd get paid this. I get paid that." He admitted being hesitant to speak negatively about her until her feud with Candace Owens forced his hand. Drawing inspiration from a statement he attributed to Ben Shapiro where "at some point your friendship has to go in the back seat and your country and what is right needs to go in the front seat." Lynch decided to "take the shackles off." He described Kelly as a "phony conservative" who should have remained an independent journalist rather than positioning herself as "the queen of conservatism," accusing her of "grabbing the low-hanging fruit" for attention and money. Shifting focus, Lynch contrasted Kelly's motives with those of others. "For Megan, I think it's attention and money," he stated. "For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." Regarding Candace Owens, he offered a more personal assessment: "For Candace, I just think she feels so irrelevant that she's trying to find her place. She's got daddy issues." Throughout the discussion, Lynch framed these figures as influencers contributing to a problematic shift on the right, driven by ego and ambition rather than principled conservatism.
1:24

Tucker Craves Influence, Candace Craves Relevance, Megyn Kelly Grabbing Low-Hanging Fruit! "For Megyn, I think it's attention and money... For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." ~Dennis Michael Lynch In a recent interview with filmmaker and commentator Dinesh D'Souza, conservative podcaster and commentator Dennis Michael Lynch shared his candid views on prominent figures he associates with the "woke right," including Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens. Lynch emphasized that their motivations stem not primarily from financial gain, but from deeper drives like power, influence, attention, and personal relevance. Lynch explained his initial reluctance to criticize Megyn Kelly, noting how significantly she boosted his career. "Megan really uh brought my career to the next level," he said. "I would go to an airport... Everybody would notice me, ask me for my autograph. I'd get speeches. I'd get paid this. I get paid that." He admitted being hesitant to speak negatively about her until her feud with Candace Owens forced his hand. Drawing inspiration from a statement he attributed to Ben Shapiro where "at some point your friendship has to go in the back seat and your country and what is right needs to go in the front seat." Lynch decided to "take the shackles off." He described Kelly as a "phony conservative" who should have remained an independent journalist rather than positioning herself as "the queen of conservatism," accusing her of "grabbing the low-hanging fruit" for attention and money. Shifting focus, Lynch contrasted Kelly's motives with those of others. "For Megan, I think it's attention and money," he stated. "For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." Regarding Candace Owens, he offered a more personal assessment: "For Candace, I just think she feels so irrelevant that she's trying to find her place. She's got daddy issues." Throughout the discussion, Lynch framed these figures as influencers contributing to a problematic shift on the right, driven by ego and ambition rather than principled conservatism.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

30,331 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Case closed on Elon Musk's Islamophobia. He doesn’t even bother to deny it in his new interview with Zanny Minton Beddoes of The Economist: Zanny: Are you anti-Muslim? Elon: Um, I am I'm against having... If people are coming to a country with antithetical views, I am against that. I'm against uhhh, you know I'm, against... I'm against rape and murder, I'm against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we've come to accept in the West. And I think it's a crying shame that the sort of traditional media like you don't recognise this." Also, Musk doubled down on his praise of the widely panned film "Citizen Vigilante" which shows the eponymous vigilante killing an entire Muslim family at the end, including women and children.
1:26

Case closed on Elon Musk's Islamophobia. He doesn’t even bother to deny it in his new interview with Zanny Minton Beddoes of The Economist: Zanny: Are you anti-Muslim? Elon: Um, I am I'm against having... If people are coming to a country with antithetical views, I am against that. I'm against uhhh, you know I'm, against... I'm against rape and murder, I'm against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we've come to accept in the West. And I think it's a crying shame that the sort of traditional media like you don't recognise this." Also, Musk doubled down on his praise of the widely panned film "Citizen Vigilante" which shows the eponymous vigilante killing an entire Muslim family at the end, including women and children.

The War Journal

16,105 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

BREAKING: Rep. Eric Swalwell pleads to Pam Bondi to look into a laundry list of threats he says are spurred by the words of President Trump: "We have a bingo card at home that my kids have made of what will come next. I expected that the President would come after his enemies, but what I want to talk to you next is serious, and I did not expect this would happen, and I'd like your help on it." "The President has inspired death threats against me and many sitting up here with me." "The President can come after me. It's fine. I'm in the arena. So are these folks. But we never expected that the Department of Justice would not seek to prosecute and investigate those who are making threats against us, and that would include those on that side of the aisle, and I'm just asking for your help to protect life because life is at risk with the environment we're in right now."
4:44

BREAKING: Rep. Eric Swalwell pleads to Pam Bondi to look into a laundry list of threats he says are spurred by the words of President Trump: "We have a bingo card at home that my kids have made of what will come next. I expected that the President would come after his enemies, but what I want to talk to you next is serious, and I did not expect this would happen, and I'd like your help on it." "The President has inspired death threats against me and many sitting up here with me." "The President can come after me. It's fine. I'm in the arena. So are these folks. But we never expected that the Department of Justice would not seek to prosecute and investigate those who are making threats against us, and that would include those on that side of the aisle, and I'm just asking for your help to protect life because life is at risk with the environment we're in right now."

E X X ➠A L E R T S

85,324 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"Guys know - you throw it to me, it's getting in the air. The majority of the time, I feel like I'm open. That comes with a grain of salt - I know I've got to take good shots and play the right way as well." - Jordan Clarkson on his role with the Knicks
0:54

"Guys know - you throw it to me, it's getting in the air. The majority of the time, I feel like I'm open. That comes with a grain of salt - I know I've got to take good shots and play the right way as well." - Jordan Clarkson on his role with the Knicks

Knicks Videos

402,865 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

David Grusch says there are a lot of attention seeking charlatans in the UFO space selling books and right now he’s focused on the disclosure fight and would like to return to normal life “This subject brings out a lot of charlatans, a lot of people who want attention, a lot of people who want to generate certain narratives. I'm just here to do a job and to get this information out to the American public. I would love to go back to my normal life. I live in Colorado and I rather just ATV and hike with my dogs and not have to deal with this on the public stage. I never wanted to be a public personality. I have no book deal unlike other people in this space. I'll write a book. I promise I'll write a book after this is all over. We're in the middle of a battle right now, I'm in the fight.”
0:48

David Grusch says there are a lot of attention seeking charlatans in the UFO space selling books and right now he’s focused on the disclosure fight and would like to return to normal life “This subject brings out a lot of charlatans, a lot of people who want attention, a lot of people who want to generate certain narratives. I'm just here to do a job and to get this information out to the American public. I would love to go back to my normal life. I live in Colorado and I rather just ATV and hike with my dogs and not have to deal with this on the public stage. I never wanted to be a public personality. I have no book deal unlike other people in this space. I'll write a book. I promise I'll write a book after this is all over. We're in the middle of a battle right now, I'm in the fight.”

Red Panda Koala

27,917 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on Christos Tzolis: "I'm very pleased with him. First of all, the way he has adapted to the club, to the team. The connection he's already generated with the boys. "I think you're going to love the player. He's a very direct player. He's got the ball between the eyes. I think really good at linking up. He has a lot of similarities with Leo in a lot of the things that he can do and the spaces he can occupy. "And then the work ethic that he has. He's a boy that comes with so much hunger as well and wants to prove it. It's a dream for him and we are here to help him."
0:45

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on Christos Tzolis: "I'm very pleased with him. First of all, the way he has adapted to the club, to the team. The connection he's already generated with the boys. "I think you're going to love the player. He's a very direct player. He's got the ball between the eyes. I think really good at linking up. He has a lot of similarities with Leo in a lot of the things that he can do and the spaces he can occupy. "And then the work ethic that he has. He's a boy that comes with so much hunger as well and wants to prove it. It's a dream for him and we are here to help him."

Connor Humm

225,641 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

Ian Machado Garry says he did not contact Tom Aspinall before signing with Matchroom Talent Agency: "I believe that me and Tom Aspinall are in very, very different situations right now... I am getting everything that I've wanted. I'm happy with everything that I've negotiated, argued for, and agreed to with the UFC. I'm not looking for anything else right now. Outside of the sport, all I'm trying to do is bring more attention to my name. There are still a lot of people out there who don't know who I am, and I want to make sure that between every fight, and before every fight, more and more people know about me and see what I'm doing."
1:27

Ian Machado Garry says he did not contact Tom Aspinall before signing with Matchroom Talent Agency: "I believe that me and Tom Aspinall are in very, very different situations right now... I am getting everything that I've wanted. I'm happy with everything that I've negotiated, argued for, and agreed to with the UFC. I'm not looking for anything else right now. Outside of the sport, all I'm trying to do is bring more attention to my name. There are still a lot of people out there who don't know who I am, and I want to make sure that between every fight, and before every fight, more and more people know about me and see what I'm doing."

Ariel Helwani

332,980 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Joe Rogan is a Democrat and a Republican: “I am liberal in every social way…. I'm very liberal in terms of civil rights, gay rights, and women's rights, all those core issues that make a person a progressive.” “I'm also a hunter. I'm very Pro Second Amendment, I'm also very Pro military, I’m very pro police, very Pro first responders, Fire Department…. So in that regard, I'm very right-wing” “I'm politically homeless… I think there's more people in the center than there are even on both sides now because one of the things that happened during the Trump administration and during the pandemic, a lot of people did not feel like they belong on one side or the other but they're in communities where you have to support one side or the other or you don't feel like you have a tribe, and everybody wants to be a part of a tribe and it takes real courage to stand out away from your tribe and say, ‘I don't agree with that.’” A heavy majority of Americans fall in a similar position as Joe Rogan described in this clip. Some of you may lean more left and a little right, some of you may lean to both sides equally, and some of you may lean more right and a little left; but you are all the same in that you don’t align with one party exactly and you are politically homeless. This video is important because it shows you this is not just ok, it’s what a majority of people feel. The future of political parties is literally no political party. When did you become politically homeless👇🏻
3:34

Joe Rogan is a Democrat and a Republican: “I am liberal in every social way…. I'm very liberal in terms of civil rights, gay rights, and women's rights, all those core issues that make a person a progressive.” “I'm also a hunter. I'm very Pro Second Amendment, I'm also very Pro military, I’m very pro police, very Pro first responders, Fire Department…. So in that regard, I'm very right-wing” “I'm politically homeless… I think there's more people in the center than there are even on both sides now because one of the things that happened during the Trump administration and during the pandemic, a lot of people did not feel like they belong on one side or the other but they're in communities where you have to support one side or the other or you don't feel like you have a tribe, and everybody wants to be a part of a tribe and it takes real courage to stand out away from your tribe and say, ‘I don't agree with that.’” A heavy majority of Americans fall in a similar position as Joe Rogan described in this clip. Some of you may lean more left and a little right, some of you may lean to both sides equally, and some of you may lean more right and a little left; but you are all the same in that you don’t align with one party exactly and you are politically homeless. This video is important because it shows you this is not just ok, it’s what a majority of people feel. The future of political parties is literally no political party. When did you become politically homeless👇🏻

End Tribalism in Politics

546,036 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Turning Point USA's Precarious Position Amid Tucker Carlson's Nick Fuentes Interview! "I think that in fact Tucker is doing this partly to attack Turning Point, if you ask me what my opinion is about that." Today in an interview with Brannon Howse, cultural critic James Lindsay dissected the mounting tensions surrounding Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its founder Charlie Kirk, exacerbated by Tucker Carlson's decision to platform far-right provocateur Nick Fuentes. Lindsay, a longtime observer of ideological battles within conservative circles, highlighted how Fuentes has long posed a disruptive force to TPUSA, now amplified by Carlson's high-profile engagement. Lindsay explained that Fuentes has spent "most of a decade" targeting TPUSA and Kirk, operating "parasitically off of Turning Point events to try to grow a following" while creating ongoing problems. He pointed to Fuentes' recent escalations, including "awful things" directed at Kirk's wife, the organization itself, and Kirk personally. Despite this history of antagonism, Carlson chose to interview Fuentes in what Lindsay described as "the most gentle kind of... positive, let's give you a nice profile" manner—far from the "hard-hitting" style Carlson employs with mainstream figures like Ted Cruz. This soft approach, Lindsay noted, stands in stark contrast to Fuentes' entrenched hostility toward TPUSA, rendering the situation "very awkward," especially as Carlson remains a headliner for the group's events. Speculating on Carlson's intentions, Lindsay suggested the interview might be a deliberate jab at TPUSA. "I think that in fact Tucker is doing this partly to attack Turning Point, if you ask me what my opinion is about that," he stated. He further pondered whether Carlson was angling for cancellation to manufacture controversy, posing the question: "Is he trying to get Turning Point to cancel him and therefore create controversy?" This development places TPUSA in a "very tough bind," according to Lindsay, who outlined the organization's limited paths forward. One option is to firmly disinvite Carlson, declaring, as Lindsay advocated, "we draw the line here. This Nick Fuentes thing was too far. He had so much animosity to TPUSA, to Charlie, to everything." Such a move, however, would invite fierce backlash, with Carlson likely retorting, "Well, I'm being censored. Turning Point USA is controlled by Jews or whatever it happens to be," thereby "turn[ing] up the volume on an attack against TPUSA to maximum volume." The alternative, Lindsay warned, is for TPUSA to rally behind Carlson, echoing recent defenses from figures like Andrew Klavan, who tweeted about "all rowing in the same direction." Yet this stance would saddle the organization with Fuentes' toxic associations through a "transitive property," given Carlson's glowing profile of him. Fuentes, laden with "all of his baggage," has waged what he called "groper wars" on TPUSA "repeatedly trying to destroy the organization" and positioning himself as a "direct personal enemy of Charlie and everything he stood for."Ultimately, Lindsay urged TPUSA to seize the moment as a turning point; ironically, of its own making. "I think the right option is to use this as the opportunity to draw the line and say enough is enough," he advised. "I don't know what Tucker's doing. We wish him well. We hope he gets back... in alignment with clear thinking, but we can't have this at our event." Acknowledging the inevitable "viciously attacked" response, Lindsay framed the choice as a necessary stand for integrity amid the conservative movement's fracturing alliances.
2:39

Turning Point USA's Precarious Position Amid Tucker Carlson's Nick Fuentes Interview! "I think that in fact Tucker is doing this partly to attack Turning Point, if you ask me what my opinion is about that." Today in an interview with Brannon Howse, cultural critic James Lindsay dissected the mounting tensions surrounding Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its founder Charlie Kirk, exacerbated by Tucker Carlson's decision to platform far-right provocateur Nick Fuentes. Lindsay, a longtime observer of ideological battles within conservative circles, highlighted how Fuentes has long posed a disruptive force to TPUSA, now amplified by Carlson's high-profile engagement. Lindsay explained that Fuentes has spent "most of a decade" targeting TPUSA and Kirk, operating "parasitically off of Turning Point events to try to grow a following" while creating ongoing problems. He pointed to Fuentes' recent escalations, including "awful things" directed at Kirk's wife, the organization itself, and Kirk personally. Despite this history of antagonism, Carlson chose to interview Fuentes in what Lindsay described as "the most gentle kind of... positive, let's give you a nice profile" manner—far from the "hard-hitting" style Carlson employs with mainstream figures like Ted Cruz. This soft approach, Lindsay noted, stands in stark contrast to Fuentes' entrenched hostility toward TPUSA, rendering the situation "very awkward," especially as Carlson remains a headliner for the group's events. Speculating on Carlson's intentions, Lindsay suggested the interview might be a deliberate jab at TPUSA. "I think that in fact Tucker is doing this partly to attack Turning Point, if you ask me what my opinion is about that," he stated. He further pondered whether Carlson was angling for cancellation to manufacture controversy, posing the question: "Is he trying to get Turning Point to cancel him and therefore create controversy?" This development places TPUSA in a "very tough bind," according to Lindsay, who outlined the organization's limited paths forward. One option is to firmly disinvite Carlson, declaring, as Lindsay advocated, "we draw the line here. This Nick Fuentes thing was too far. He had so much animosity to TPUSA, to Charlie, to everything." Such a move, however, would invite fierce backlash, with Carlson likely retorting, "Well, I'm being censored. Turning Point USA is controlled by Jews or whatever it happens to be," thereby "turn[ing] up the volume on an attack against TPUSA to maximum volume." The alternative, Lindsay warned, is for TPUSA to rally behind Carlson, echoing recent defenses from figures like Andrew Klavan, who tweeted about "all rowing in the same direction." Yet this stance would saddle the organization with Fuentes' toxic associations through a "transitive property," given Carlson's glowing profile of him. Fuentes, laden with "all of his baggage," has waged what he called "groper wars" on TPUSA "repeatedly trying to destroy the organization" and positioning himself as a "direct personal enemy of Charlie and everything he stood for."Ultimately, Lindsay urged TPUSA to seize the moment as a turning point; ironically, of its own making. "I think the right option is to use this as the opportunity to draw the line and say enough is enough," he advised. "I don't know what Tucker's doing. We wish him well. We hope he gets back... in alignment with clear thinking, but we can't have this at our event." Acknowledging the inevitable "viciously attacked" response, Lindsay framed the choice as a necessary stand for integrity amid the conservative movement's fracturing alliances.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

42,840 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Asmongold explains why he's not commenting on the Mizkif video "I'm not gonna make any comments on that cause I'm still in a lawsuit with Mizkif..when that's over, then I'll make comments..right now I'm not gonna say anything..that would be stupid" "My goal is getting out of it and then explaining pretty much what's going on..and I think also to some extent, there could be like foul play but ya, I have no intention of talking or engaging with any of that until it's over"
2:09

Asmongold explains why he's not commenting on the Mizkif video "I'm not gonna make any comments on that cause I'm still in a lawsuit with Mizkif..when that's over, then I'll make comments..right now I'm not gonna say anything..that would be stupid" "My goal is getting out of it and then explaining pretty much what's going on..and I think also to some extent, there could be like foul play but ya, I have no intention of talking or engaging with any of that until it's over"

yeet

126,807 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Tucker Carlson on potential war with Iran: "I think the downsides are really kind of overwhelming." "I'm amazed by how close we are to a military action against Iran." "... I think it comes with perils that people are not considering or willfully ignoring." "And the main one is Iran is not Iraq, or it's not Libya, it's not isolated." "It's a central player in BRICS." "90% of Iran's oil exports go to China. It just signed a defense agreement with Russia in January. It has backup." "It has big allies that represent the majority of the world's population, and the majority of the world's economy and landmass." "So the potential for this to become something much, much bigger and unmanageable is real. It's there." "I think the downsides are really kind of overwhelming." "The president has said repeatedly, 'We'll do everything we can to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.'" "I think it's a completely reasonable goal. Nobody wants that." "But it doesn't mean that it has to happen on Friday, actually."
0:46

Tucker Carlson on potential war with Iran: "I think the downsides are really kind of overwhelming." "I'm amazed by how close we are to a military action against Iran." "... I think it comes with perils that people are not considering or willfully ignoring." "And the main one is Iran is not Iraq, or it's not Libya, it's not isolated." "It's a central player in BRICS." "90% of Iran's oil exports go to China. It just signed a defense agreement with Russia in January. It has backup." "It has big allies that represent the majority of the world's population, and the majority of the world's economy and landmass." "So the potential for this to become something much, much bigger and unmanageable is real. It's there." "I think the downsides are really kind of overwhelming." "The president has said repeatedly, 'We'll do everything we can to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.'" "I think it's a completely reasonable goal. Nobody wants that." "But it doesn't mean that it has to happen on Friday, actually."

The All-In Podcast

82,426 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Post-Liberals' Shocking Plan: Let Democrats Win to Radicalize the Right! Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. In a recent episode of "The Andrea Shaffer Show," James Lindsay discussed what he describes as a deliberate strategy among certain post-liberal right figures to undermine President Trump's agenda. Lindsay explained that some in this group advocate allowing Democrats to regain control, anticipating that this would lead to governance as problematic as or worse than the Biden or Obama administrations. Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. According to Lindsay, these individuals view this as a necessary step toward installing a true right-wing dictator figure. Lindsay highlighted that this approach stems from dissatisfaction with Trump's perceived moderation. He noted that President Trump is seen by these critics as too mainstream and not aggressive enough in addressing the nation's issues. He pointed out that if Trump's policies succeed and deliver results, with people recognizing that this energy could genuinely make America great again, it would hinder the emergence of a more radical paleoconservative or post-liberal party. Lindsay added that figures like Tucker Carlson, whom he described as a paleoconservative with various allegiances, seek a much more extreme right-wing party and view MAGA as having overshadowed that vision. To achieve their aims, Lindsay argued, these post-liberals would work to ensure Trump appears pinned down, particularly through Democratic gains in Congress during midterms. This would prevent him from fully implementing his agenda, leaving many initiatives incomplete or reversed. The narrative would then shift to claim that Trump failed because he was not hardline enough or strong enough. Lindsay referenced hearing similar rhetoric from individuals such as Auron McIntyre and Curtis Yarvin, who have said that President Trump is only doing one or two percent of what is needed to solve the problems at hand. Lindsay emphasized the repeated claim that Trump is not going nearly far enough. Ultimately, Lindsay contended that by engineering Trump's perceived failure, these voices aim to radicalize the base further. They would position a new demagogue to rise, promising to fix what Trump could not by going even farther, even too far if necessary. Lindsay stressed that some post-liberals have explicitly outlined this as their plan, though he noted uncertainty about whether Tucker Carlson has stated it directly. This perspective frames the current political moment as a battle not just against the left, but against elements within the right pushing for acceleration toward authoritarian extremes.
2:42

Post-Liberals' Shocking Plan: Let Democrats Win to Radicalize the Right! Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. In a recent episode of "The Andrea Shaffer Show," James Lindsay discussed what he describes as a deliberate strategy among certain post-liberal right figures to undermine President Trump's agenda. Lindsay explained that some in this group advocate allowing Democrats to regain control, anticipating that this would lead to governance as problematic as or worse than the Biden or Obama administrations. Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. According to Lindsay, these individuals view this as a necessary step toward installing a true right-wing dictator figure. Lindsay highlighted that this approach stems from dissatisfaction with Trump's perceived moderation. He noted that President Trump is seen by these critics as too mainstream and not aggressive enough in addressing the nation's issues. He pointed out that if Trump's policies succeed and deliver results, with people recognizing that this energy could genuinely make America great again, it would hinder the emergence of a more radical paleoconservative or post-liberal party. Lindsay added that figures like Tucker Carlson, whom he described as a paleoconservative with various allegiances, seek a much more extreme right-wing party and view MAGA as having overshadowed that vision. To achieve their aims, Lindsay argued, these post-liberals would work to ensure Trump appears pinned down, particularly through Democratic gains in Congress during midterms. This would prevent him from fully implementing his agenda, leaving many initiatives incomplete or reversed. The narrative would then shift to claim that Trump failed because he was not hardline enough or strong enough. Lindsay referenced hearing similar rhetoric from individuals such as Auron McIntyre and Curtis Yarvin, who have said that President Trump is only doing one or two percent of what is needed to solve the problems at hand. Lindsay emphasized the repeated claim that Trump is not going nearly far enough. Ultimately, Lindsay contended that by engineering Trump's perceived failure, these voices aim to radicalize the base further. They would position a new demagogue to rise, promising to fix what Trump could not by going even farther, even too far if necessary. Lindsay stressed that some post-liberals have explicitly outlined this as their plan, though he noted uncertainty about whether Tucker Carlson has stated it directly. This perspective frames the current political moment as a battle not just against the left, but against elements within the right pushing for acceleration toward authoritarian extremes.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

16,440 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Zanny Minton Beddoes: "People say that you're a racist. What is the motivation for doing that? Are you fomenting this?" Elon Musk: "My partner, she's half-Indian and I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. So I would say I'm not racist. And also if you look at the people that are employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races." Beddoes: "Are you anti-Muslim?" Musk: "If people are coming to a country with antithetical views, I am against that. I'm against rape and murder. I'm against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we've come to accept in the west. And I think it's a crying shame that the, sort of, traditional media, like you, don't recognize this." (📽️: The Economist)
1:23

Zanny Minton Beddoes: "People say that you're a racist. What is the motivation for doing that? Are you fomenting this?" Elon Musk: "My partner, she's half-Indian and I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. So I would say I'm not racist. And also if you look at the people that are employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races." Beddoes: "Are you anti-Muslim?" Musk: "If people are coming to a country with antithetical views, I am against that. I'm against rape and murder. I'm against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we've come to accept in the west. And I think it's a crying shame that the, sort of, traditional media, like you, don't recognize this." (📽️: The Economist)

Julia 🇺🇸

84,660 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

CNN’s Scott Jennings on the Tucker/Ben/Megyn/Steve/Candace debate: “Well, I think it's gotten rather personal between some of these personalities and that's unfortunate. But look, I didn't hear Ben actually necessarily calling for the deplatforming of anyone. What he was saying was that, particularly as it relates to Candace Owens, you know, we don't have to accept someone who's out here monetizing the grief of a widow. I mean, Charlie Kirk was graphically and savagely murdered, and you've had someone out here for months and months monetizing that, and for the purposes of self-aggrandizement going on and on and on about all these conspiracy theories. Some of them revolve around Israel, of course, as they always do. But specifically, I think he had a great point, which is that, just because someone shows up and says, I want to talk about this doesn't make you a leader or necessarily accept it in the conservative movement, especially, especially if it's at the expense of a grieving widow. Erica Kirk has had to put up with this up to the point of meeting with Candace Owens, and it still hasn't stopped. So, can you have debates about things? Sure. Should we be platforming or accepting people who are trying to terrorize a grieving widow? I don't think so.”
1:11

CNN’s Scott Jennings on the Tucker/Ben/Megyn/Steve/Candace debate: “Well, I think it's gotten rather personal between some of these personalities and that's unfortunate. But look, I didn't hear Ben actually necessarily calling for the deplatforming of anyone. What he was saying was that, particularly as it relates to Candace Owens, you know, we don't have to accept someone who's out here monetizing the grief of a widow. I mean, Charlie Kirk was graphically and savagely murdered, and you've had someone out here for months and months monetizing that, and for the purposes of self-aggrandizement going on and on and on about all these conspiracy theories. Some of them revolve around Israel, of course, as they always do. But specifically, I think he had a great point, which is that, just because someone shows up and says, I want to talk about this doesn't make you a leader or necessarily accept it in the conservative movement, especially, especially if it's at the expense of a grieving widow. Erica Kirk has had to put up with this up to the point of meeting with Candace Owens, and it still hasn't stopped. So, can you have debates about things? Sure. Should we be platforming or accepting people who are trying to terrorize a grieving widow? I don't think so.”

Curtis Houck

29,076 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Here is video of Rory's full quotes on Bryson and the ruling. On the actual penalty: "I think there's no doubt that he improved the line of his backswing. Again, it's like, whether it was careless or whether it was intentional, I don't think it matters. Hopefully it was careless, but I think the two-shot penalty was justified for sure." Added this on everything that played out after the round: "I won't pretend to be up here and defend Bryson. I'm not particularly fond of him. I think a lot of it's performative. I think a lot of it's for attention. "To hold the tournament hostage like that, and to have all of us, players, volunteers, everyone waiting on him to depart, I didn't feel like it was a great look." When asked if he thinks Bryson knew what he was doing: "I'm not in his mind. I'm not in his -- but it didn't look good."
2:12

Here is video of Rory's full quotes on Bryson and the ruling. On the actual penalty: "I think there's no doubt that he improved the line of his backswing. Again, it's like, whether it was careless or whether it was intentional, I don't think it matters. Hopefully it was careless, but I think the two-shot penalty was justified for sure." Added this on everything that played out after the round: "I won't pretend to be up here and defend Bryson. I'm not particularly fond of him. I think a lot of it's performative. I think a lot of it's for attention. "To hold the tournament hostage like that, and to have all of us, players, volunteers, everyone waiting on him to depart, I didn't feel like it was a great look." When asked if he thinks Bryson knew what he was doing: "I'm not in his mind. I'm not in his -- but it didn't look good."

Kyle Porter

523,785 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce