Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
There are groups set up in every area of contested Science posing as dissidents against the Mainstream Narrative. But when you deconstruct their arguments, they are carefully constructed distraction techniques that don't actually challenge the fundamentals of the Science in question.
13,098 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
18 Kommentare

"The biggest mistake in dealing with people is believing that they think like you." Vera F. Birkebihl

Similar skullduggery happened during our old now-DECEASED "AIDS" dissident movement😢. If anyone is curious about what happened in our old "AIDS" dissident movement and who helped to SINK it, read this: And the rest of my substack:

"elites" blah blah blah "agenda" blah blah blah "narrative" blah blah blah

Yes i think so. They are introduced to destroy any opposition at its root.

@NickHudsonCT In the Electric Universe, the preferred method is the alternative hangout, which is always limited + often takes the community into a new, usually contradictory direction that buries the original in weaker claims and hypotheses.

Currently listening to this in the car on the school run. I also did science heavy studies, school straight As & was an atheist for years. Now I think it’s mostly baloney! Funny to hear you went to Kings; my 2 are at St Ed’s, but several of their primary friends are now at Kings

Hey nice to meet you. St Eds is lovely had loads of friends there, great choristers.

Rand Paul comes to mind

They are all over substack too

@NickHudsonCT Delingy is… official tube of the real suckers…

Exactly this!

Do either of these guys ever talk to someone who doesn't already agree/ just want to interview them? Why don't they have confrontational conversations.

Ah, there's the "evil elites" again at 0:54. Part of the course for those who won't ever mention the tiny hats. Kinda funny when addressing controlled opposition.

i see you didn't watch the whole interview.

Got a timestamp for the good part? ;)

Dunno... but in it i insinuate about the holohoax.

Good man. Keep it up.

That sounds plausible but what are these groups? Can you or James give examples in climate science that seem to be dissident but aren't really?
