Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

There are various discussions which have been discussed during the hearing before the Honourable Supreme Court. The Honourable Supreme Court is disagreeing with certain provisions which have been introduced in the Amendment act.

Vishnu Shankar Jain

268,134 subscribers

14,407 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Vaddepally Praveen 🇮🇳 🕉️1 year ago

Mr. Vishnu Jain, please press forward how we Indian citizens are suffering because of Waqf and why they should be abolished all together. Temple Lands, People Lands in Tamilnadu....Lands in Kerala every where in India lands are being brazenly trespassed. Waqf must be punished 🙏.

Prashanta Pal1 year ago

Honourable supreme court ✖️ Muslim appeasement court ✅

Kingstone Comics1 year ago

“The U.S. Constitution” by U.S. Comics brings our founding document to life by describing the reasons behind each amendment and the rights those amendments protect for all Americans. Discover the 100-page graphic novel from U.S. Comics.

వీర🕉🇮🇳1 year ago

It is nothing but sharia court (SC) in persecuting hindus

Ravi/ರವಿ/ரவி/रविः1 year ago

Sir, how can the Supreme Court change the legislation passed by the parliament? Even if they pass the interim order, can the parliament not override it?

🕊️ Harsh1 year ago

आपके कॉन्फिडेंस के आगे मुस्लिम्स के हौसले पस्त हैं और हिंदुओं को उम्मीद मिली है, अपना ख्याल रखें।

Sivarunan1 year ago

Bad times ahead. The mialords will try to be mialords

వీర🕉🇮🇳1 year ago

He never expresses concern on continuous persecution of hindus happenning in India.

Jayram Yerra1 year ago

When parlament passed who are they to object ?

mtweeter1 year ago

Will the SC now frame laws for this country point by point? Where are we headed...?

अखंड भारत 🪷🇮🇳1 year ago

SC has turn to be biggest political party in the country on behalf of Mu$lims the so called minority. SC is putting the country 1000 years back. SC judges has more interests in GoI passed laws rather look in the pending cases. @rashtrapatibhvn and @VPIndia must interven.

Related Videos

"JKNC has decided to challenge the Waqf Amendment Act in the Supreme Court of India." Honourable CM Omar Abdullah.

"JKNC has decided to challenge the Waqf Amendment Act in the Supreme Court of India." Honourable CM Omar Abdullah.

JKNC

18,840 views • 1 year ago

VIDEO | Ahead of the Supreme Court hearing in Waqf (Amendment) Act case, advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain (Vishnu Shankar Jain) says, "We had to say that there are many provisions of Waqf Act, 1995, which should completely go. The first situation is, there is a batch of petitions challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act, if a situation develops, as they have asked for stay, then the earlier provisions, will be implemented, we said that those provisions should also be stayed as they are draconian. There are many draconian provisions which have been still left in amendment exercise, we have challenged it, like there is a word- person aggrieved, which includes non-Muslims, they have the obligation to challenge it in Waqf Tribunal, if they have lost their land, we have challenged it. We demanded that every case should go to civil court, there is a provision to give notice for filing case in Section 89, we have challenged it." #WaqfAmendmentAct

VIDEO | Ahead of the Supreme Court hearing in Waqf (Amendment) Act case, advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain (Vishnu Shankar Jain) says, "We had to say that there are many provisions of Waqf Act, 1995, which should completely go. The first situation is, there is a batch of petitions challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act, if a situation develops, as they have asked for stay, then the earlier provisions, will be implemented, we said that those provisions should also be stayed as they are draconian. There are many draconian provisions which have been still left in amendment exercise, we have challenged it, like there is a word- person aggrieved, which includes non-Muslims, they have the obligation to challenge it in Waqf Tribunal, if they have lost their land, we have challenged it. We demanded that every case should go to civil court, there is a provision to give notice for filing case in Section 89, we have challenged it." #WaqfAmendmentAct

Press Trust of India

17,009 views • 1 year ago

Today in HoC LD Women and Equalities spokesperson took aim at the Equality Act & Supreme Court ruling - questioning "whether we need fresh legislation in this country to deal with all the issues in the Equalities [sic] Act which have been raised by the...Supreme Court Ruling?'🧵

Today in HoC LD Women and Equalities spokesperson took aim at the Equality Act & Supreme Court ruling - questioning "whether we need fresh legislation in this country to deal with all the issues in the Equalities [sic] Act which have been raised by the...Supreme Court Ruling?'🧵

Liberal Voice for Women

78,242 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court granting anticipatory bail to Congress leader Pawan Khera, Congress spokesperson Shama Mohammed says, "I agree with the Supreme Court. He should have got bail before from the High Court of Assam. It did not need to go to the Supreme Court. It's just a defamation case... We congratulate him..." On the commercial LPG cylinder price hike, he says, "24 hours have not gone by after the last vote has been placed, and there is an increase in the gas cylinder price... They wanted to get all the votes, which is why they increased it after the votes had been cast..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court granting anticipatory bail to Congress leader Pawan Khera, Congress spokesperson Shama Mohammed says, "I agree with the Supreme Court. He should have got bail before from the High Court of Assam. It did not need to go to the Supreme Court. It's just a defamation case... We congratulate him..." On the commercial LPG cylinder price hike, he says, "24 hours have not gone by after the last vote has been placed, and there is an increase in the gas cylinder price... They wanted to get all the votes, which is why they increased it after the votes had been cast..."

ANI

14,742 views • 1 month ago

Yesterday, the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act. Today, I am pushing my TERM Act, which would create term limits for Supreme Court Justices, and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act. Today, I am pushing my TERM Act, which would create term limits for Supreme Court Justices, and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

Rep. Hank Johnson

47,958 views • 1 month ago

Advocate Nizam Pasha explains the problems with the recent order on the Waqf Amendment Act. He’s representing me before the Supreme Court on the challenge to the Act.

Advocate Nizam Pasha explains the problems with the recent order on the Waqf Amendment Act. He’s representing me before the Supreme Court on the challenge to the Act.

Asaduddin Owaisi

19,121 views • 9 months ago

BREAKING—YOUR REACTION: President Biden just unveiled his proposed changes for the U.S. Supreme Court, the "No One is Above the Law" Amendment, which would establish term limits for Supreme Court justices and a Code of Conduct.

BREAKING—YOUR REACTION: President Biden just unveiled his proposed changes for the U.S. Supreme Court, the "No One is Above the Law" Amendment, which would establish term limits for Supreme Court justices and a Code of Conduct.

Simon Ateba

277,794 views • 1 year ago

"Kenyans should know that the Supreme Court is there for them...the judiciary is there for them..."Subhanllah, has Justice Ibrahim just landed from Jupiter? Which Supreme Court is Ibrahim taking about? The one defined by JurisPESA?

"Kenyans should know that the Supreme Court is there for them...the judiciary is there for them..."Subhanllah, has Justice Ibrahim just landed from Jupiter? Which Supreme Court is Ibrahim taking about? The one defined by JurisPESA?

Ahmednasir Abdullahi SC

114,320 views • 1 year ago

In 2021, Democrats introduced legislation to PACK the Supreme Court with four far left activist judges. Now they have the nerve to call the Court “illegitimate.” There is nothing more illegitimate than trying to RIG the Court when you don’t get your way.

In 2021, Democrats introduced legislation to PACK the Supreme Court with four far left activist judges. Now they have the nerve to call the Court “illegitimate.” There is nothing more illegitimate than trying to RIG the Court when you don’t get your way.

Lance Gooden

26,695 views • 1 month ago

The Honourable Supreme Court has specifically ruled that Waqf as a concept is not a Religious concept, it's a charitable concept.

The Honourable Supreme Court has specifically ruled that Waqf as a concept is not a Religious concept, it's a charitable concept.

Vishnu Shankar Jain

29,586 views • 1 year ago

The Supreme Court Has Been Impeached!

The Supreme Court Has Been Impeached!

The United Spot

151,375 views • 2 years ago

The ‘Palestine Action’ proscription has just been overturned by the Supreme Court which ordered that the ban be lifted | Wokerati Marty

The ‘Palestine Action’ proscription has just been overturned by the Supreme Court which ordered that the ban be lifted | Wokerati Marty

Sarah Wilkinson

45,951 views • 4 months ago

.President Donald J. Trump departs for the U.S. Supreme Court, which is hearing oral arguments today in Trump v. Barbara, the birthright citizenship case.

.President Donald J. Trump departs for the U.S. Supreme Court, which is hearing oral arguments today in Trump v. Barbara, the birthright citizenship case.

Rapid Response 47

210,169 views • 2 months ago

BREAKING: Supreme Court Abuja is currently on fire. The Supreme Court building at Three Arms Zone in Abuja is currently on fire with offices of some justices burnt down. 3 justices offices have already been razed completely and the fire is still spreading.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Abuja is currently on fire. The Supreme Court building at Three Arms Zone in Abuja is currently on fire with offices of some justices burnt down. 3 justices offices have already been razed completely and the fire is still spreading.

AMB. SERAH IBRAHIM

461,460 views • 2 years ago

The very foundation of SIR is wrong and when it came before the Supreme Court, it should have been stopped. The court should have asked on what basis SIR is being carried out but it didn’t happen. — Former SC judge Madan Lokur in conversation with Kapil Sibal Ji

The very foundation of SIR is wrong and when it came before the Supreme Court, it should have been stopped. The court should have asked on what basis SIR is being carried out but it didn’t happen. — Former SC judge Madan Lokur in conversation with Kapil Sibal Ji

Shantanu

20,478 views • 1 month ago

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Supreme Court’s notice to the Centre on the Data Protection Law, Advocate Prashant Bhushan says, “Arguments on the Data Protection Act were heard by the Supreme Court. The main provisions challenged were the amendments made to the Right to Information Act, under which the exemption from disclosure of information on the grounds of privacy has been drastically altered. Earlier, the law stated that only such personal information would be exempt which had no relation to public activity or public interest. But now there is a blanket exemption for all personal information, which means no personal information will be disclosed... Today, the Supreme Court has issued notice in these petitions and has listed the matter for further hearing.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Supreme Court’s notice to the Centre on the Data Protection Law, Advocate Prashant Bhushan says, “Arguments on the Data Protection Act were heard by the Supreme Court. The main provisions challenged were the amendments made to the Right to Information Act, under which the exemption from disclosure of information on the grounds of privacy has been drastically altered. Earlier, the law stated that only such personal information would be exempt which had no relation to public activity or public interest. But now there is a blanket exemption for all personal information, which means no personal information will be disclosed... Today, the Supreme Court has issued notice in these petitions and has listed the matter for further hearing.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

13,393 views • 4 months ago

Basically, the issues we highlighted during discussions in Parliament have largely been addressed by the Court. - Firstly, the qualification of five years of Muslim practice, which was debated extensively in Parliament. The top court has struck it down. - The government also said they were giving powers to the Collectors to decide disputes. This has also been struck down. - As for the issue of non-Muslim members in the Waqf Board, the Supreme Court has reduced the number of non-Muslims allowed on Waqf Councils and observed that Chief Executives of the Waqf Boards should be from the Muslim community. Some of the points that have been debated by the Parliament and by the people of this country have been addressed by the Supreme Court. And we consider it a welcome move. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) Shri K C Venugopal

Basically, the issues we highlighted during discussions in Parliament have largely been addressed by the Court. - Firstly, the qualification of five years of Muslim practice, which was debated extensively in Parliament. The top court has struck it down. - The government also said they were giving powers to the Collectors to decide disputes. This has also been struck down. - As for the issue of non-Muslim members in the Waqf Board, the Supreme Court has reduced the number of non-Muslims allowed on Waqf Councils and observed that Chief Executives of the Waqf Boards should be from the Muslim community. Some of the points that have been debated by the Parliament and by the people of this country have been addressed by the Supreme Court. And we consider it a welcome move. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) Shri K C Venugopal

Congress

12,139 views • 9 months ago

MASSIVE BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court has just struck down Trump's ILLEGAL tariffs. We've been telling you for a year now that Trump does not have the authority to implement these tariffs without Congress. We were right. The Supreme Court, 3 justices which are appointed by Trump, just ruled that he broke the law!

MASSIVE BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court has just struck down Trump's ILLEGAL tariffs. We've been telling you for a year now that Trump does not have the authority to implement these tariffs without Congress. We were right. The Supreme Court, 3 justices which are appointed by Trump, just ruled that he broke the law!

Brian Krassenstein

421,986 views • 4 months ago

As reported by Newsweek “Lawmakers in multiple states have introduced measures urging the Supreme Court to strike down Obergefell vs. Hodges, the landmark 2015 decision that established the nationwide right to same-sex marriage.” They go on to report, “….Resolutions explicitly calling for the Supreme Court to reverse the decision in Obergefell have been introduced in Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota, as well as in Idaho. All polls indicate that such a ruling would be against the will of the people, but when it comes to a Supreme Court in which the majority has been created by Christian Nationalist advocates, I fear the writing is on the wall. How did we get to Gilead? People are justifiably very worried as illustrated by Emma. 🎥 TikTok - Emma.g049

As reported by Newsweek “Lawmakers in multiple states have introduced measures urging the Supreme Court to strike down Obergefell vs. Hodges, the landmark 2015 decision that established the nationwide right to same-sex marriage.” They go on to report, “….Resolutions explicitly calling for the Supreme Court to reverse the decision in Obergefell have been introduced in Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota, as well as in Idaho. All polls indicate that such a ruling would be against the will of the people, but when it comes to a Supreme Court in which the majority has been created by Christian Nationalist advocates, I fear the writing is on the wall. How did we get to Gilead? People are justifiably very worried as illustrated by Emma. 🎥 TikTok - Emma.g049

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

23,136 views • 1 year ago