Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

There is a big Conspiracy in Kolkata Rape Case!! Thread Alert 🚨 (1/8) I have 7 Questions for the Kolkata Govt. & Police… 7 Questions that prove Sanjay Roy isn’t the “Main Culprit”!! He is just a “Bali ka Bakra” jise kurbaan kiya ja raha hai kuch “Important” logo...

nikitaksthakur's profile picture

Nikita Thakur

8,740 subscribers

1,048,872 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

Thread Alert 🚨 (2/8) On August 9th, a 31-year-old PG doctor at Kolkata's RG Kar Hospital was brutally raped and murdered in a seminar room! Found bleeding from eyes, mouth, and private parts—completely naked. By 4 AM, Sanjay Roy allegedly assaulted and killed her. The body was found later. BUT the identity of the first person who found her still unknown? #JusticeForNirbhaya2 #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #JusticeForVictims #BengalHorror #KolkataDoctorDeath #rgkarincident #RGKARmedical #wewantjustice #Hangtheculprit #RGKAR #Nirbhaya #NirbhayaOfKolkata

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

Thread Alert 🚨 (3/8) Victim’s body was found at 7:30 AM, but her parents were informed 3 HOURS later at 10:30 AM. Even then, they were forced to wait 3 more hours outside the seminar hall, pleading to see their daughter. When they finally did, her body was covered in injuries, bleeding, and without clothes. Yet, the hospital tried to label this cold-blooded murder as a suicide! #JusticeForNirbhaya2 #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #JusticeForVictims #BengalHorror #KolkataDoctorDeath #rgkarincident #RGKARmedical #wewantjustice #Hangtheculprit #RGKAR #Nirbhaya #NirbhayaOfKolkata #CoverUp #Nirbhaya2

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

Thread Alert 🚨 (4/8) First Loophole: Why did the hospital declare a clear rape and murder as suicide? Second: Why were the victim's parents made to wait 3 hours to see their daughter? Evidence tampering? Third: How could the principal claim psychosis and suicide without an autopsy? Hospital tried to cover up, but doctors protested, and the truth emerged—brutal assault and murder! #JusticeForNirbhaya2 #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #JusticeForVictims #BengalHorror #KolkataDoctorDeath #rgkarincident #RGKARmedical #wewantjustice #Hangtheculprit #RGKAR #Nirbhaya #NirbhayaOfKolkata #Nirbhaya2 #CoverUpExposed

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

Thread Alert 🚨 (5/8) Fourth Loophole: How did Sanjay Roy, a civic volunteer with no hospital ties, enter the seminar hall at 4 AM without being stopped? In a government hospital where even patient relatives can’t enter after hours, who allowed him in? Security lapse or inside help? CCTV caught him, and he confessed—but why was he even there? #JusticeForNirbhaya2 #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #JusticeForVictims #BengalHorror #KolkataDoctorDeath #rgkarincident #RGKARmedical #wewantjustice #Hangtheculprit #RGKAR #Nirbhaya #NirbhayaOfKolkata #Nirbhaya2 #CoverUpExposed #UnansweredQuestions

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

Thread Alert 🚨 (6/8) Fifth Loophole: Why hasn’t the CCTV footage of the incident been released? Are there more culprits, with Sanjay Roy being a scapegoat under pressure? Sixth: Why is construction happening just 20m from the crime scene? Is this a deliberate attempt to destroy crucial evidence? #JusticeForNirbhaya2 #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #JusticeForVictims #BengalHorror #KolkataDoctorDeath #rgkarincident #RGKARmedical #wewantjustice #Hangtheculprit #RGKAR #Nirbhaya #NirbhayaOfKolkata #Nirbhaya2 #CoverUpExposed

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

Thread Alert 🚨 (7/8) How did Sanjay Roy, a serial offender with a history of domestic violence and harassment, become a civic volunteer? No background checks for government posts? In this entire story, I found these 7 loopholes! 7 such threads that are not connecting at all, which is why the whole nation wants to see who is being protected in this case now. Is Sanjay a scapegoat while the real culprits roam free? #JusticeForNirbhaya2 #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #JusticeForVictims #BengalHorror #KolkataDoctorDeath #rgkarincident #RGKARmedical #wewantjustice #Hangtheculprit #RGKAR #Nirbhaya #NirbhayaOfKolkata #Nirbhaya2 #CoverUpExposed

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

Thread Alert 🚨 (8/8) When incidents like this happen, society often shames the victim instead of the culprit. Nirbhaya faced this, and now, a doctor in her own hospital! The problem isn’t in women’s clothes or their actions—it’s in the mindset of criminals like Sanjay Roy! Let’s not stay silent this time. Share this with #JusticeForNirbhaya2 and demand swift justice! #JusticeForNirbhaya2 #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #JusticeForVictims #StopVictimShaming #BengalHorror #KolkataDoctorDeath #rgkarincident #RGKARmedical #wewantjustice #Hangtheculprit #RGKAR #Nirbhaya #NirbhayaOfKolkata #Nirbhaya2 #CoverUpExposed

Profilbild von Nikita Thakur
Nikita Thakurvor 2 Jahren

For FULL VIDEO, check out here 👇

Profilbild von Anmol Kumar
Anmol Kumarvor 2 Jahren

When the report came which told that total 150gm of semen was found in victim body, it was clear that this has been done by a group of people. Don't know whether Sanjay Roy is the culprit or not, but 💯sure that 5-6 people are involved in this crime.

Profilbild von UltraSaffron3
UltraSaffron3vor 2 Jahren

What is the use you have not tagged the Justices in all courts who let criminals on bail with every offender has a future but every citizen does not have security with these releases … Justices are criminals & Scoundrels who are getting sold for money and letting out rapists on bail in every city it is the same story

Ähnliche Videos

Disgusting Reality of RG Kar Medical College EXPOSED! Thread Alert 🚨 (1/11) This not the First Rape Case! Hospital rushed to call off all these cases as Suicide, and Stopped the Investigation! We have multiple proofs that the Hospital indeed ran a Sex Racket where Pornographic films were shot. Dead bodies of patients were also used to shoot Necrophilic content i.e, pornographic films with dead bodies. Hospital also ran an Organ Trafficking Racket. Victim’s father has alleged that the Crime did not happen in the Seminar room. The body was just placed there. And Finally there are major allegations on Mamata Banerjee’s govt TMC. We have found links of TMC workers' involvement in the Vandalisation of hospital property, attacking doctors in the protest and trying to tamper with the evidence of the case! We also have proof that the main accused Sanjay Roy and the Principal of the Hospital Sandip Ghosh are connected to TMC. And finally all these complaints are already registered by the ex Superintendent of the Hospital - Shekhar Ali. He had written a letter exposing all these Scams of the Hospital to the CM of Bengal Mamata Banerjee, Governor of Bengal and also the President of India! Why was No Action Taken Against the Hospital? Was the government trying to protect someone?? CC: Smita Prakash Dr. Vikram Sampath, FRHistS Sanjeev Sanyal Anand Ranganathan Nupur J Sharma THE SKIN DOCTOR Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर Aditya Raj Kaul Anshul Saxena Suvendu Adhikari Narendra Modi Rahul Gandhi NCW ALL INDIA MEDICAL STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION Dr. Rohan Krishnan FAIMA Doctors Association #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #Nirbhaya2 #UncoverTheTruth #kolkataincident #RGKarMedicalcollege
3:31

Disgusting Reality of RG Kar Medical College EXPOSED! Thread Alert 🚨 (1/11) This not the First Rape Case! Hospital rushed to call off all these cases as Suicide, and Stopped the Investigation! We have multiple proofs that the Hospital indeed ran a Sex Racket where Pornographic films were shot. Dead bodies of patients were also used to shoot Necrophilic content i.e, pornographic films with dead bodies. Hospital also ran an Organ Trafficking Racket. Victim’s father has alleged that the Crime did not happen in the Seminar room. The body was just placed there. And Finally there are major allegations on Mamata Banerjee’s govt TMC. We have found links of TMC workers' involvement in the Vandalisation of hospital property, attacking doctors in the protest and trying to tamper with the evidence of the case! We also have proof that the main accused Sanjay Roy and the Principal of the Hospital Sandip Ghosh are connected to TMC. And finally all these complaints are already registered by the ex Superintendent of the Hospital - Shekhar Ali. He had written a letter exposing all these Scams of the Hospital to the CM of Bengal Mamata Banerjee, Governor of Bengal and also the President of India! Why was No Action Taken Against the Hospital? Was the government trying to protect someone?? CC: Smita Prakash Dr. Vikram Sampath, FRHistS Sanjeev Sanyal Anand Ranganathan Nupur J Sharma THE SKIN DOCTOR Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर Aditya Raj Kaul Anshul Saxena Suvendu Adhikari Narendra Modi Rahul Gandhi NCW ALL INDIA MEDICAL STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION Dr. Rohan Krishnan FAIMA Doctors Association #KolkataCase #JusticeForMoumita #Nirbhaya2 #UncoverTheTruth #kolkataincident #RGKarMedicalcollege

Gaurav Thakur

26,492 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

ALL EYES ON HINDUS IN BANGLADESH! Thread Alert 🚨 (1/9) Hindus in Bangladesh are facing severe PERSECUTION—temples burned, idols smashed, homes attacked. And if India won’t wake up now, this might be India’s future too! In a country where Hindu minorities once made up 22% of the population, they're now just 7.5%. And no, this is not accidental!! It's a planned strategy. And what’s concerning is that, the same disturbing patterns are emerging in parts of India now. As I said, if we don't learn from Bangladesh's mistakes, we risk repeating them. Time to be the voice for the voiceless!✊ Why is Bangladesh failing its minorities? Let's understand. CC: Smita Prakash Dr. Vikram Sampath, FRHistS Sanjeev Sanyal Anand Ranganathan Abhijit Majumder Nupur J Sharma Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर Agnimitra Paul BJP Aditya Raj Kaul Anshul Saxena Suvendu Adhikari Narendra Modi Rahul Gandhi Ritu #सत्यसाधक Shehzad Jai Hind Ashwini Shrivastava #SaveBangladeshiHindus #AllEyesonBangladeshHindus #Bangladeshindus #SaveHindusInBangladesh #HindusUnderAttack #BangladeshUnderAttack #HindusAreNotSafeInBangladesh #HinduLivesMatter #Bangladesh #India #BangladeshIndia #BangladeshCrisis #Bangladeshbleeding #BangladeshViolence #HinduGenocideInBangladesh
2:16

ALL EYES ON HINDUS IN BANGLADESH! Thread Alert 🚨 (1/9) Hindus in Bangladesh are facing severe PERSECUTION—temples burned, idols smashed, homes attacked. And if India won’t wake up now, this might be India’s future too! In a country where Hindu minorities once made up 22% of the population, they're now just 7.5%. And no, this is not accidental!! It's a planned strategy. And what’s concerning is that, the same disturbing patterns are emerging in parts of India now. As I said, if we don't learn from Bangladesh's mistakes, we risk repeating them. Time to be the voice for the voiceless!✊ Why is Bangladesh failing its minorities? Let's understand. CC: Smita Prakash Dr. Vikram Sampath, FRHistS Sanjeev Sanyal Anand Ranganathan Abhijit Majumder Nupur J Sharma Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर Agnimitra Paul BJP Aditya Raj Kaul Anshul Saxena Suvendu Adhikari Narendra Modi Rahul Gandhi Ritu #सत्यसाधक Shehzad Jai Hind Ashwini Shrivastava #SaveBangladeshiHindus #AllEyesonBangladeshHindus #Bangladeshindus #SaveHindusInBangladesh #HindusUnderAttack #BangladeshUnderAttack #HindusAreNotSafeInBangladesh #HinduLivesMatter #Bangladesh #India #BangladeshIndia #BangladeshCrisis #Bangladeshbleeding #BangladeshViolence #HinduGenocideInBangladesh

Nikita Thakur

49,406 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 24 HOURS, NO FIR AGAINST DEVELOPER – WHO IS PROTECTING THE POWERFUL? 🚨 Justice for Mohammad Muzammil Khokar Cannot Wait More than 24 hours have passed since Mohammad Muzammil Khokar, a local resident, lost his life in the crane collapse at the JP Infra construction site in Mira Road. The victim's family continues to allege that no FIR has been registered against the developer despite their repeated demands. As President of We Work Foundation, I raise serious questions regarding the handling of this case by MBVV Police Commissioner Niket Kaushik, Additional Commissioner of Police Sanjay Shinde, DCP Headquarters Sanjay Kumar Patil, DCP Zone-1 Rahul Chavan, and Senior Police Inspector Rahul Kumar Patil of Kashigaon Police Station. The family has publicly alleged that justice is being delayed. If these allegations are true, they raise serious concerns about whether the law is being applied equally and whether influential persons are being given special treatment. I also question why the construction site reportedly resumed work after the incident. If accurate, was the accident scene properly secured? Was all evidence preserved? Were all statutory departments directed to inspect the site immediately after the tragedy? I call upon the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Maharashtra, the Home Department, and the Director General of Police to order a high-level, time-bound inquiry into the entire incident, including the actions of all concerned officials. If any officer is found to have failed in their legal duties, strict disciplinary and legal action must follow. The people of Maharashtra deserve justice—not silence. No developer, no official, and no influential person should ever be above the law. Justice for Mohammad Muzammil Khokar must prevail. MIRA BHAYANDAR VASAI VIRAR POLICE My_MBMC Narendra Mehta CMO Maharashtra Eknath Shinde - एकनाथ शिंदे Pratap Baburao Sarnaik @nareshmmaske @chiefsecmaharashtra
3:53

🚨 24 HOURS, NO FIR AGAINST DEVELOPER – WHO IS PROTECTING THE POWERFUL? 🚨 Justice for Mohammad Muzammil Khokar Cannot Wait More than 24 hours have passed since Mohammad Muzammil Khokar, a local resident, lost his life in the crane collapse at the JP Infra construction site in Mira Road. The victim's family continues to allege that no FIR has been registered against the developer despite their repeated demands. As President of We Work Foundation, I raise serious questions regarding the handling of this case by MBVV Police Commissioner Niket Kaushik, Additional Commissioner of Police Sanjay Shinde, DCP Headquarters Sanjay Kumar Patil, DCP Zone-1 Rahul Chavan, and Senior Police Inspector Rahul Kumar Patil of Kashigaon Police Station. The family has publicly alleged that justice is being delayed. If these allegations are true, they raise serious concerns about whether the law is being applied equally and whether influential persons are being given special treatment. I also question why the construction site reportedly resumed work after the incident. If accurate, was the accident scene properly secured? Was all evidence preserved? Were all statutory departments directed to inspect the site immediately after the tragedy? I call upon the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Maharashtra, the Home Department, and the Director General of Police to order a high-level, time-bound inquiry into the entire incident, including the actions of all concerned officials. If any officer is found to have failed in their legal duties, strict disciplinary and legal action must follow. The people of Maharashtra deserve justice—not silence. No developer, no official, and no influential person should ever be above the law. Justice for Mohammad Muzammil Khokar must prevail. MIRA BHAYANDAR VASAI VIRAR POLICE My_MBMC Narendra Mehta CMO Maharashtra Eknath Shinde - एकनाथ शिंदे Pratap Baburao Sarnaik @nareshmmaske @chiefsecmaharashtra

Mohnaaz S Shaikh.

17,910 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

During our session, someone from the audience asked us if it was “antisemitic” to oppose foreign aid to Israel. Both Steve Deace and I said “no, it was not.” That is a policy issue. Both of us wanted to see our foreign aid to all other countries to go down to zero, and that would include Israel. Within the conservative movement, it should be possible to come to a conference held by Turning Point USA, and to hear some speakers argue for zeroing out all foreign aid, and other speakers advocate for a judicious use of strategic foreign aid, with America’s best interests being the reason for the aid. Great. Have that debate. Make sure both sides are represented. Talk about policy. Is Israel our greatest ally? Let us debate the question! Let us knock ourselves out. Nobody is an antisemite for thinking that some other country is our greatest ally. But there is another question, another kind of question, that does not belong at a conference like this at all. That is the question of whether or not the organizers of the conference you are going to were complicit in the grotesque murder of their founder and friend. That is an allegation that is gobsmackingly off-the-leash, with the holder of the leash being off her meds. If someone thinks that is a reasonable question, and he gets an invitation to speak at TPUSA (for some reason), and he accepts that invitation, it really means that he doesn’t believe it is a reasonable question at all, and is just being a hypocritical opportunist. Going to the conference to chum around with the murderers? Here is where the Great Smudge is happening. This is where the disingenuous juke move is being performed. A grotesque libel and slander is hurled at the leadership of TPUSA, with preparations being made to be insulted and affronted if they decided not to invite you next time. If they don’t invite you next time, it will be plain indication that they “don’t want to face the music.” They are trying to censor “questions”! No, it would actually be a plain indication that free speech has performed one of its central functions, which is to identify who the morons are. And in this case, who the impudent morons are. Candace Owens is not just “asking questions.” She is making very serious allegations. She is an accuser. She is an accuser of persons. She is the perverse spirit that the Lord has poured into the bowl. She is the great bringer of what might be called inviso-receipts. She has a vast army of people following her who are demanding the dopamine rush they get whenever she feeds them the next crazy line. That is why the moratorium that Erika and Candace agreed on couldn’t hold—it was like arranging a cease-fire with Hamas. Candace has a ravenous bear for an audience, and she has to feed it tainted meat, with that meat getting increasingly tainted. This is why we are moving into territory formerly occupied by those people who needed to read the tabloid headlines about Madonna and Sasquatch having a love child. It is disingenuous, in extremis, to pretend that these questions are anything alike.
19:56

During our session, someone from the audience asked us if it was “antisemitic” to oppose foreign aid to Israel. Both Steve Deace and I said “no, it was not.” That is a policy issue. Both of us wanted to see our foreign aid to all other countries to go down to zero, and that would include Israel. Within the conservative movement, it should be possible to come to a conference held by Turning Point USA, and to hear some speakers argue for zeroing out all foreign aid, and other speakers advocate for a judicious use of strategic foreign aid, with America’s best interests being the reason for the aid. Great. Have that debate. Make sure both sides are represented. Talk about policy. Is Israel our greatest ally? Let us debate the question! Let us knock ourselves out. Nobody is an antisemite for thinking that some other country is our greatest ally. But there is another question, another kind of question, that does not belong at a conference like this at all. That is the question of whether or not the organizers of the conference you are going to were complicit in the grotesque murder of their founder and friend. That is an allegation that is gobsmackingly off-the-leash, with the holder of the leash being off her meds. If someone thinks that is a reasonable question, and he gets an invitation to speak at TPUSA (for some reason), and he accepts that invitation, it really means that he doesn’t believe it is a reasonable question at all, and is just being a hypocritical opportunist. Going to the conference to chum around with the murderers? Here is where the Great Smudge is happening. This is where the disingenuous juke move is being performed. A grotesque libel and slander is hurled at the leadership of TPUSA, with preparations being made to be insulted and affronted if they decided not to invite you next time. If they don’t invite you next time, it will be plain indication that they “don’t want to face the music.” They are trying to censor “questions”! No, it would actually be a plain indication that free speech has performed one of its central functions, which is to identify who the morons are. And in this case, who the impudent morons are. Candace Owens is not just “asking questions.” She is making very serious allegations. She is an accuser. She is an accuser of persons. She is the perverse spirit that the Lord has poured into the bowl. She is the great bringer of what might be called inviso-receipts. She has a vast army of people following her who are demanding the dopamine rush they get whenever she feeds them the next crazy line. That is why the moratorium that Erika and Candace agreed on couldn’t hold—it was like arranging a cease-fire with Hamas. Candace has a ravenous bear for an audience, and she has to feed it tainted meat, with that meat getting increasingly tainted. This is why we are moving into territory formerly occupied by those people who needed to read the tabloid headlines about Madonna and Sasquatch having a love child. It is disingenuous, in extremis, to pretend that these questions are anything alike.

Douglas Wilson

69,804 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Sonarpur Case Exposed In 24 hours Bua Bhateeja Caught Conspiring? The Truth About Mamata-Abhishek Drama Is Out Sonarpur case exposed in 24 hours?? 🔴 CID Notice 🔴 Helmet Mystery 🔴 Hospital Drama 🔴 Foreign Treatment To Escape These are among the big questions that people are asking…. Sensationalist online claims intensified on 31 May 2026, following two main developments: 🤔 The Leaked Audio: A major political controversy erupted after an alleged audio recording surfaced online. The recording reportedly captures Mamata Banerjee aggressively confronting the CEO of Kolkata's Belle Vue Hospital regarding her nephew's medical admission. 🤔 Medical Reports: Following the attack, Abhishek Banerjee was taken to private hospitals in Kolkata. Doctors and medical reports stated that he only sustained minor bruises on his chest, remained fully conscious and stable, and did not require hospital admission. Mamata Banerjee alleged that the police and authorities pressured the hospitals into refusing him admission. Are Mamata-Abhishek's problems increasing by the day?? 🟠 There is a big difference between the claims of locals and TMC regarding the death of Sanju Karmakar 🟠 Public protest in Abhishek Banerjee's program 🟠 Helmet Mystery raised new questions 🟠 Controversy of sudden hospitalization and illness after alleged assault 🟠 Why two hospitals did not tell the need for any treatment? 🟠 6 people were arrested after the incident 🟠 New discussion about the political relations of the arrested people 🟠 Big question about CID notice and timing of Sonarpur incident 🟠 New debate on Mamata Banerjee's foreign treatment statement 🟠 Controversy increased after Kalyan Banerjee case Was what happened in Sonarpur just a staged attack? And is there a big political game behind it? Do they both want to scoot from the country?? Credit : Priyo Bandhu Hindi
12:59

Sonarpur Case Exposed In 24 hours Bua Bhateeja Caught Conspiring? The Truth About Mamata-Abhishek Drama Is Out Sonarpur case exposed in 24 hours?? 🔴 CID Notice 🔴 Helmet Mystery 🔴 Hospital Drama 🔴 Foreign Treatment To Escape These are among the big questions that people are asking…. Sensationalist online claims intensified on 31 May 2026, following two main developments: 🤔 The Leaked Audio: A major political controversy erupted after an alleged audio recording surfaced online. The recording reportedly captures Mamata Banerjee aggressively confronting the CEO of Kolkata's Belle Vue Hospital regarding her nephew's medical admission. 🤔 Medical Reports: Following the attack, Abhishek Banerjee was taken to private hospitals in Kolkata. Doctors and medical reports stated that he only sustained minor bruises on his chest, remained fully conscious and stable, and did not require hospital admission. Mamata Banerjee alleged that the police and authorities pressured the hospitals into refusing him admission. Are Mamata-Abhishek's problems increasing by the day?? 🟠 There is a big difference between the claims of locals and TMC regarding the death of Sanju Karmakar 🟠 Public protest in Abhishek Banerjee's program 🟠 Helmet Mystery raised new questions 🟠 Controversy of sudden hospitalization and illness after alleged assault 🟠 Why two hospitals did not tell the need for any treatment? 🟠 6 people were arrested after the incident 🟠 New discussion about the political relations of the arrested people 🟠 Big question about CID notice and timing of Sonarpur incident 🟠 New debate on Mamata Banerjee's foreign treatment statement 🟠 Controversy increased after Kalyan Banerjee case Was what happened in Sonarpur just a staged attack? And is there a big political game behind it? Do they both want to scoot from the country?? Credit : Priyo Bandhu Hindi

Augadh

15,825 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 THREAD: Why I started investigating Mayor Zohran Mamdani (and why this isn’t going away) Watch this first ⬇️ 1/ Let me be very clear. I didn’t go looking for this story. This started with ONE simple question: Where did a donation actually go? 2/ Money that was supposed to go to a nonprofit in Astoria, Queens… …was allegedly redirected somewhere else. So I asked questions. Like anyone should. 3/ And instead of transparency? I got THREATS. Not from the Mayor. Not from the nonprofit. From a MUSIC PRODUCER. 4/ Let that sink in. A random person with no official role felt bold enough to intimidate me… Over questions about MONEY. Why? 5/ Ask yourself this: Why would anyone be angry about someone asking where THEIR donation went? Why the pressure? Why the silence? 6/ That’s when I knew— This isn’t just about one donation. This is about something bigger. 7/ I was actually contacted about this last year. At the time, I didn’t act on it. Now I understand why it was brought to me. 8/ The more I look into this, the more questions come up. And the reactions I’ve received? Only confirm I’m on the right track. 9/ I’m not backing down. If you have nothing to hide, questions shouldn’t be a problem. 10/ Watch the video. Share it. Ask questions. Because I don’t think this story ends here. JD Vance please look into the nonprofit food distributions in Queens and the Bronx! JD Vance
5:25

🚨 THREAD: Why I started investigating Mayor Zohran Mamdani (and why this isn’t going away) Watch this first ⬇️ 1/ Let me be very clear. I didn’t go looking for this story. This started with ONE simple question: Where did a donation actually go? 2/ Money that was supposed to go to a nonprofit in Astoria, Queens… …was allegedly redirected somewhere else. So I asked questions. Like anyone should. 3/ And instead of transparency? I got THREATS. Not from the Mayor. Not from the nonprofit. From a MUSIC PRODUCER. 4/ Let that sink in. A random person with no official role felt bold enough to intimidate me… Over questions about MONEY. Why? 5/ Ask yourself this: Why would anyone be angry about someone asking where THEIR donation went? Why the pressure? Why the silence? 6/ That’s when I knew— This isn’t just about one donation. This is about something bigger. 7/ I was actually contacted about this last year. At the time, I didn’t act on it. Now I understand why it was brought to me. 8/ The more I look into this, the more questions come up. And the reactions I’ve received? Only confirm I’m on the right track. 9/ I’m not backing down. If you have nothing to hide, questions shouldn’t be a problem. 10/ Watch the video. Share it. Ask questions. Because I don’t think this story ends here. JD Vance please look into the nonprofit food distributions in Queens and the Bronx! JD Vance

Lattina Brown, MPA 🇯🇲🇺🇸

36,339 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

How Fake Doctors Blend In — and Why Passing Exams Is Not Enough How do you detect a fake doctor? In Alberta, that question is no longer theoretical. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta almost never refuses a licence. Between 2018 and 2025 it received 7,077 applications and rejected only 37 — an approval rate of 99.48%. Foreign medical graduates now make up more than 40% of the province’s doctors. Some come from countries where there is no reliable way to verify who they are. So how is an Albertan supposed to tell a licensed fake doctor from a licensed real one? In 2011, South African authorities dismantled what they described as a syndicate of bogus Nigerian doctors. The case was later cited in the South African Medical Journal by Janet Seggie, in an article titled “Trust me, I’m a ‘doctor’: Of bogus doctors, medical impostors, and medical fraudsters.” Her point was blunt: spotting a fake doctor is much harder than people think. She quoted an editorial published in The Lancet more than a century ago: “The bogus doctor is a criminal who is a specialist — and he is assisted by the credulity of others. Medical men... do not always take the precaution of establishing his identity, and laymen... who fall into his hands have not sufficient knowledge or sufficient observation to detect him.” A 1996 study from Bath University, reported in the Health Service Journal, showed how this works inside a hospital. More than 30 bogus doctors had been able to work for Britain’s National Health Service. As Hartland wrote, "a well-equipped bogus doctor can blend into the medical culture, taking up a position in the medical team, learning by apprenticeship, benefiting from the actions of colleagues, and accumulating experience. In many ways, bogus doctors are uncomfortably like genuine doctors.” That is why the ultimate test of legitimacy is not a licence, which Alberta hands out like candy. It is not a diploma, which can be purchased or forged. It is not even a Canadian exam, which a determined person can study for and pass. The real test is identity: graduation years, work history, and a record with no contradictions. In a profession that deals with life and death, there should be no room for inconsistencies. That is exactly the problem with Nigeria. Unlike South Africa and most G20 countries, it has no publicly accessible registry. Canadians have no independent way to verify the identity of anyone who claims to have been a doctor there. In 2024, Baby Alita was sent home from Beaverlodge Hospital in Alberta by Nigerian-trained “Dr.” Ogochukwu Obed Anizoba, despite her family’s unresolved concerns. She died hours later. Anizoba first denied ever being suspended in South Africa. He has in fact been suspended there since 2012, allegedly for misrepresentation and for not possessing a valid primary medical diploma from Nigeria. His brother, Tochukwu Gideon Anizoba, also practises as a doctor in Alberta and has three different graduation years listed for the same medical diploma. If identity cannot be verified, a licence does not settle the question. And while the U.K.’s medical accreditation body admits that "100% security is almost impossible," Alberta’s CPSA continues to dodge a more basic one: how many other highly questionable foreign graduates has it already licensed to practise medicine in Alberta?
2:14

How Fake Doctors Blend In — and Why Passing Exams Is Not Enough How do you detect a fake doctor? In Alberta, that question is no longer theoretical. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta almost never refuses a licence. Between 2018 and 2025 it received 7,077 applications and rejected only 37 — an approval rate of 99.48%. Foreign medical graduates now make up more than 40% of the province’s doctors. Some come from countries where there is no reliable way to verify who they are. So how is an Albertan supposed to tell a licensed fake doctor from a licensed real one? In 2011, South African authorities dismantled what they described as a syndicate of bogus Nigerian doctors. The case was later cited in the South African Medical Journal by Janet Seggie, in an article titled “Trust me, I’m a ‘doctor’: Of bogus doctors, medical impostors, and medical fraudsters.” Her point was blunt: spotting a fake doctor is much harder than people think. She quoted an editorial published in The Lancet more than a century ago: “The bogus doctor is a criminal who is a specialist — and he is assisted by the credulity of others. Medical men... do not always take the precaution of establishing his identity, and laymen... who fall into his hands have not sufficient knowledge or sufficient observation to detect him.” A 1996 study from Bath University, reported in the Health Service Journal, showed how this works inside a hospital. More than 30 bogus doctors had been able to work for Britain’s National Health Service. As Hartland wrote, "a well-equipped bogus doctor can blend into the medical culture, taking up a position in the medical team, learning by apprenticeship, benefiting from the actions of colleagues, and accumulating experience. In many ways, bogus doctors are uncomfortably like genuine doctors.” That is why the ultimate test of legitimacy is not a licence, which Alberta hands out like candy. It is not a diploma, which can be purchased or forged. It is not even a Canadian exam, which a determined person can study for and pass. The real test is identity: graduation years, work history, and a record with no contradictions. In a profession that deals with life and death, there should be no room for inconsistencies. That is exactly the problem with Nigeria. Unlike South Africa and most G20 countries, it has no publicly accessible registry. Canadians have no independent way to verify the identity of anyone who claims to have been a doctor there. In 2024, Baby Alita was sent home from Beaverlodge Hospital in Alberta by Nigerian-trained “Dr.” Ogochukwu Obed Anizoba, despite her family’s unresolved concerns. She died hours later. Anizoba first denied ever being suspended in South Africa. He has in fact been suspended there since 2012, allegedly for misrepresentation and for not possessing a valid primary medical diploma from Nigeria. His brother, Tochukwu Gideon Anizoba, also practises as a doctor in Alberta and has three different graduation years listed for the same medical diploma. If identity cannot be verified, a licence does not settle the question. And while the U.K.’s medical accreditation body admits that "100% security is almost impossible," Alberta’s CPSA continues to dodge a more basic one: how many other highly questionable foreign graduates has it already licensed to practise medicine in Alberta?

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

21,929 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Location: Chomu, Jaipur, Rajasthan Local women allege that the police, under the pretext of conducting raids, entered Muslim-majority areas, vandalized properties, and verbally abused and mistreated women. Even a widowed woman, whose house had no male occupants, was not spared. The windows of cars parked in the houses were smashed, and the vehicles were damaged. Most shockingly, it is alleged that several police officers were in plain clothes, entering the houses one by one, and no female police officers were present with them. Following clashes between the police and the Muslim community, the internet was shut down in the area for 24 hours. The question isn't why the internet was shut down, but why this unrest occurred in the first place? The dispute over the Kalendra Mosque in Chomu is not new. The first case was registered in 1954, and surprisingly, the police station in-charge himself filed the case at that time. The FIR stated that intelligence information had been received that some people were setting fire to the thatched-roof mosque. The report also states that the in-charge reached the spot, the mosque was burning, and he safely retrieved the Holy Quran from inside. This means the roots of the dispute are seven decades old. In 2011, the Rajasthan High Court explicitly issued a stay order on this mosque, and that stay order is still in effect today. So the question arises, how did the police allow the removal of the stones from there despite the court's stay order? The stones that had been lying there since 1981. The police argue that the stones were removed by "mutual consent." But doesn't the police know this basic law that even "mutual consent" after a court stay order requires the court's permission? If mutual consent is everything, then what is the need for the court? The place where the stones were lying is said to be part of the mosque. The stones were removed from there, and then poles were erected. After this, the Bajrang Dal and Vishva Hindu Parishad started protesting, and within no time, the police also had those poles removed. The question is clear — When the matter related to the mosque was being handled solely through an agreement between the Muslim community and the administration, and no other party was involved, then where did the Bajrang Dal and Vishva Hindu Parishad come from in this entire sequence of events? And then comes the most serious turn of events, From Friday night until around 3 AM, when members of the Muslim community and the administration were engaged in discussions, a lathi charge suddenly began. The police say that stone-pelting occurred first. The Muslim side says: “When we were complying with the administration and there was an agreement, why would we resort to stone-pelting?” So what changed suddenly? Whose pressure caused the agreement to turn into a confrontation? Who were the people who threw stones? Local residents say that “the police went back on their word. They initially said the stones would be removed and poles would be installed. Then suddenly the poles were removed, and the situation deteriorated.” The police's role throughout the entire incident raises serious questions. After the lathi charge and the alleged stone-pelting, the entire area was turned into a fortified zone, and some police officers were also injured. But what happened afterward is fraught with even more serious allegations. Janamanas Rajasthan
3:46

Location: Chomu, Jaipur, Rajasthan Local women allege that the police, under the pretext of conducting raids, entered Muslim-majority areas, vandalized properties, and verbally abused and mistreated women. Even a widowed woman, whose house had no male occupants, was not spared. The windows of cars parked in the houses were smashed, and the vehicles were damaged. Most shockingly, it is alleged that several police officers were in plain clothes, entering the houses one by one, and no female police officers were present with them. Following clashes between the police and the Muslim community, the internet was shut down in the area for 24 hours. The question isn't why the internet was shut down, but why this unrest occurred in the first place? The dispute over the Kalendra Mosque in Chomu is not new. The first case was registered in 1954, and surprisingly, the police station in-charge himself filed the case at that time. The FIR stated that intelligence information had been received that some people were setting fire to the thatched-roof mosque. The report also states that the in-charge reached the spot, the mosque was burning, and he safely retrieved the Holy Quran from inside. This means the roots of the dispute are seven decades old. In 2011, the Rajasthan High Court explicitly issued a stay order on this mosque, and that stay order is still in effect today. So the question arises, how did the police allow the removal of the stones from there despite the court's stay order? The stones that had been lying there since 1981. The police argue that the stones were removed by "mutual consent." But doesn't the police know this basic law that even "mutual consent" after a court stay order requires the court's permission? If mutual consent is everything, then what is the need for the court? The place where the stones were lying is said to be part of the mosque. The stones were removed from there, and then poles were erected. After this, the Bajrang Dal and Vishva Hindu Parishad started protesting, and within no time, the police also had those poles removed. The question is clear — When the matter related to the mosque was being handled solely through an agreement between the Muslim community and the administration, and no other party was involved, then where did the Bajrang Dal and Vishva Hindu Parishad come from in this entire sequence of events? And then comes the most serious turn of events, From Friday night until around 3 AM, when members of the Muslim community and the administration were engaged in discussions, a lathi charge suddenly began. The police say that stone-pelting occurred first. The Muslim side says: “When we were complying with the administration and there was an agreement, why would we resort to stone-pelting?” So what changed suddenly? Whose pressure caused the agreement to turn into a confrontation? Who were the people who threw stones? Local residents say that “the police went back on their word. They initially said the stones would be removed and poles would be installed. Then suddenly the poles were removed, and the situation deteriorated.” The police's role throughout the entire incident raises serious questions. After the lathi charge and the alleged stone-pelting, the entire area was turned into a fortified zone, and some police officers were also injured. But what happened afterward is fraught with even more serious allegations. Janamanas Rajasthan

The Muslim

18,288 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

PLANO, TEXAS - A Collin County FAMILY DEMANDS ANSWERS AFTER VIDEO SHOWS ABUSE OF NON-VERBAL STUDENT IN PLANO ISD! A Collin County family is calling for accountability after the abuse of a non-verbal student inside a Plano ISD classroom. They say they are being ignored despite video evidence and a confirmed finding of abuse. January 8, 2025 - The case involves Saniyah Reese, a non-verbal student at Plano Senior High School. According to her family (I spoke with the mother), approximately eight minutes of synchronized video and audio shows teacher Sharon Rosborough: •Lifting Saniyah by the neck, causing a medically documented injury •Bending her fingers backward •Failing to secure her properly, nearly causing multiple falls •Handling her aggressively in the classroom •Ignoring audible cries and distress captured on audio The family also stated that Saniyah returned home with severe diaper rash causing bleeding after being left in soiled conditions, and that she was deprived of adequate nutrition - receiving only minimal liquid intake - resulting in significant weight loss. Adult Protective Services reviewed the footage in May 2025 and sustained findings of abuse and endangerment. The family says Plano ISD failed to meaningfully respond to their concerns. The case took 404 days to move through law enforcement and prosecution: •303 days: Plano Police delayed forwarding the case to the Collin County DA (Nov. 20, 2025), only after the family sent certified letters to city officials •101 days: The DA’s Office took to present the case to a grand jury Despite APS findings and video evidence, the grand jury returned a “No Bill,” meaning no charges were filed. The family believes the outcome was influenced by how the case was presented and stated that the video evidence was not shown. They were told the case had been submitted as “mishandling, not criminal.” The family spoke at Plano City Council in November 2025 and continued raising concerns publicly. They claim they were later discouraged from speaking by the city attorney and approached by a council member offering to explain why the case was not considered criminal. On April 7, 2026, the “No Bill” was finalized. Why did Plano Police take 303 days to forward the case when they had access to the January 8 video within weeks? Police reportedly said they were reviewing older footage for probable cause. The family argues the January 8 video alone showed clear evidence of abuse and endangerment. “We spoke at the Plano City Council on Nov. 24 to warn that this sabotage was happening and continued to speak. We were discouraged from speaking publicly by the Plano City Attorney in January 2026 and again by a council member who said they wanted to meet with me to explain why it was not a crime in March 2026. On April 7, 2026, a ‘No Bill’ was returned.” — Tia Nelson (mother) “Why did it take so long for Plano PD to forward the case when they had access to the Jan. 8 video from Jan. 22–25, 2025? They told me they wanted to look at older videos to determine probable cause when the Jan. 8 video showed assault/injury to a disabled person and reckless endangerment.”
2:56

PLANO, TEXAS - A Collin County FAMILY DEMANDS ANSWERS AFTER VIDEO SHOWS ABUSE OF NON-VERBAL STUDENT IN PLANO ISD! A Collin County family is calling for accountability after the abuse of a non-verbal student inside a Plano ISD classroom. They say they are being ignored despite video evidence and a confirmed finding of abuse. January 8, 2025 - The case involves Saniyah Reese, a non-verbal student at Plano Senior High School. According to her family (I spoke with the mother), approximately eight minutes of synchronized video and audio shows teacher Sharon Rosborough: •Lifting Saniyah by the neck, causing a medically documented injury •Bending her fingers backward •Failing to secure her properly, nearly causing multiple falls •Handling her aggressively in the classroom •Ignoring audible cries and distress captured on audio The family also stated that Saniyah returned home with severe diaper rash causing bleeding after being left in soiled conditions, and that she was deprived of adequate nutrition - receiving only minimal liquid intake - resulting in significant weight loss. Adult Protective Services reviewed the footage in May 2025 and sustained findings of abuse and endangerment. The family says Plano ISD failed to meaningfully respond to their concerns. The case took 404 days to move through law enforcement and prosecution: •303 days: Plano Police delayed forwarding the case to the Collin County DA (Nov. 20, 2025), only after the family sent certified letters to city officials •101 days: The DA’s Office took to present the case to a grand jury Despite APS findings and video evidence, the grand jury returned a “No Bill,” meaning no charges were filed. The family believes the outcome was influenced by how the case was presented and stated that the video evidence was not shown. They were told the case had been submitted as “mishandling, not criminal.” The family spoke at Plano City Council in November 2025 and continued raising concerns publicly. They claim they were later discouraged from speaking by the city attorney and approached by a council member offering to explain why the case was not considered criminal. On April 7, 2026, the “No Bill” was finalized. Why did Plano Police take 303 days to forward the case when they had access to the January 8 video within weeks? Police reportedly said they were reviewing older footage for probable cause. The family argues the January 8 video alone showed clear evidence of abuse and endangerment. “We spoke at the Plano City Council on Nov. 24 to warn that this sabotage was happening and continued to speak. We were discouraged from speaking publicly by the Plano City Attorney in January 2026 and again by a council member who said they wanted to meet with me to explain why it was not a crime in March 2026. On April 7, 2026, a ‘No Bill’ was returned.” — Tia Nelson (mother) “Why did it take so long for Plano PD to forward the case when they had access to the Jan. 8 video from Jan. 22–25, 2025? They told me they wanted to look at older videos to determine probable cause when the Jan. 8 video showed assault/injury to a disabled person and reckless endangerment.”

Sarah Fields

252,286 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

1. So why did the Rwandan government and the M23 leadership only ask for me personally to come and tell the M23 story from Goma in the middle of the war on the 25th of February, 2025, as the South African, Tanzanians and Malawians (SAMIDRC) were preparing for a mass deployment of 25,000 soldiers for a two year war? 2. How did these leaders know that there was a Rutendo Matinyarare that they needed to tell this story and that if he told the story, it would end the mass deployment planned by South Africa, Malawi, and Tanzania and would lead to negations and a ceasefire between the DRC government and M23? 3. Why didn't they ask Kuda Musasiwa to do it instead? 4. Why did the Congolese government contact our government on the 1st of March, 2025, after seeing me reporting from Goma Airport where SADC soldiers were captured -on the 25th of February 2025 escorted by M23- after interviewing M23 President in Addis Ababa on the 15th of February, 2025 and again on the morning of March 1 from their base in Goma, to ask me if M23 leaders were ready to negotiate because they were ready to negotiate? 5. And why did negotiation talks between Congo and M23 immediately follow on the 10th of March, 2025, after I told them through our Presidency that M23 were ready to negotiate? 6. Why did SADC, led by our President, declare that SADC was pulling out of Congo, and South Africa, Tanzania and Malawi would no longer deploy 25,000 reinforcements three days later on the 13th of March, 2025? 7. And after talks between SADC, DRC and M23 on the 23rd of March, 2025, a ceasefire was agreed on. There is a direct cause an effect of my deployment and an end to the war, as the people who sent me wished for. 8. Why was everything I was sent to do in Congo achieved: me telling the story that was not being told by mainstream media, this leading to the halt of the deployment of SADC reinforcements, a ceasefire and the pulling out of SADC soldiers? 9. Why was I provided with a paid business class flight, five-star accommodation, personal military protection throughout my trip, and protected access into the warzone which no other reporter got? 10. Why couldn't SABC, BBC, CNN, or any other media report from Goma or Bakavu and achieve the ceasefire that I achieved? Why were none of these media houses given the same access that I was given? 11. As for sanctions, all Zimbabweans who have the relevant clearance know the truth. Why does it hurt Zimbabweans like you when they see someone at their level making change?
0:23

1. So why did the Rwandan government and the M23 leadership only ask for me personally to come and tell the M23 story from Goma in the middle of the war on the 25th of February, 2025, as the South African, Tanzanians and Malawians (SAMIDRC) were preparing for a mass deployment of 25,000 soldiers for a two year war? 2. How did these leaders know that there was a Rutendo Matinyarare that they needed to tell this story and that if he told the story, it would end the mass deployment planned by South Africa, Malawi, and Tanzania and would lead to negations and a ceasefire between the DRC government and M23? 3. Why didn't they ask Kuda Musasiwa to do it instead? 4. Why did the Congolese government contact our government on the 1st of March, 2025, after seeing me reporting from Goma Airport where SADC soldiers were captured -on the 25th of February 2025 escorted by M23- after interviewing M23 President in Addis Ababa on the 15th of February, 2025 and again on the morning of March 1 from their base in Goma, to ask me if M23 leaders were ready to negotiate because they were ready to negotiate? 5. And why did negotiation talks between Congo and M23 immediately follow on the 10th of March, 2025, after I told them through our Presidency that M23 were ready to negotiate? 6. Why did SADC, led by our President, declare that SADC was pulling out of Congo, and South Africa, Tanzania and Malawi would no longer deploy 25,000 reinforcements three days later on the 13th of March, 2025? 7. And after talks between SADC, DRC and M23 on the 23rd of March, 2025, a ceasefire was agreed on. There is a direct cause an effect of my deployment and an end to the war, as the people who sent me wished for. 8. Why was everything I was sent to do in Congo achieved: me telling the story that was not being told by mainstream media, this leading to the halt of the deployment of SADC reinforcements, a ceasefire and the pulling out of SADC soldiers? 9. Why was I provided with a paid business class flight, five-star accommodation, personal military protection throughout my trip, and protected access into the warzone which no other reporter got? 10. Why couldn't SABC, BBC, CNN, or any other media report from Goma or Bakavu and achieve the ceasefire that I achieved? Why were none of these media houses given the same access that I was given? 11. As for sanctions, all Zimbabweans who have the relevant clearance know the truth. Why does it hurt Zimbabweans like you when they see someone at their level making change?

Rutendo Matinyarare

113,407 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨Breaking🚨: Physical altercation occurs at an Ed Gallrein (Thomas Massie’s opponent) event. In the final week of the campaign, and amid backlash over what many have called a “Biden-style basement campaign,” Ed Gallrein has decided to hold more public campaign events. Reports from the ground indicate these events have not gone well. They are being advertised to the public at large to encourage attendance.I n this video, you will see two different Kentuckians attempting to get their questions answered, and a Gallrein supporter getting physical with one of the people asking questions. The first question was: Why won’t Ed Gallrein debate Thomas Massie? Gallrein responded by claiming he was debating Massie right then — while speaking in a room that did not contain Thomas Massie. The second question asked whether Gallrein would protect the Constitution from unconstitutional executive overreach regardless of who the president is. Gallrein responded by saying he disagreed with the premise of the question and refused to answer it. After the speech, the attendees attempted once more to get their questions answered. That interaction ended with a Gallrein supporter grabbing the hand, phone, and wrist of the person recording in an attempt to stop the recording. These were not people from the Massie campaign, nor professional rabble-rousers — just ordinary Kentuckians trying to get straightforward answers. They only began recording after it became clear the question-and-answer portion would not be a genuine Q&A. The jumps in the video at the end are simply from the recorder accidentally turning her phone on and off during the altercation. Other reports from different events include people being denied entry even after RSVPing, with no explanation given. Some attendees say they were turned away because they “just didn’t look right.” It has also been stated that people are leaving these events saying things like, “Well, he didn’t tell me anything,” or “I came in wanting to vote for him, but not after that.” All of this lends credence to the idea that Gallrein is refusing to debate Thomas Massie because he lacks the ability to communicate effectively and hold his own in a potentially hostile environment. The problem, of course, is that Congress is a hostile environment.
1:55

🚨Breaking🚨: Physical altercation occurs at an Ed Gallrein (Thomas Massie’s opponent) event. In the final week of the campaign, and amid backlash over what many have called a “Biden-style basement campaign,” Ed Gallrein has decided to hold more public campaign events. Reports from the ground indicate these events have not gone well. They are being advertised to the public at large to encourage attendance.I n this video, you will see two different Kentuckians attempting to get their questions answered, and a Gallrein supporter getting physical with one of the people asking questions. The first question was: Why won’t Ed Gallrein debate Thomas Massie? Gallrein responded by claiming he was debating Massie right then — while speaking in a room that did not contain Thomas Massie. The second question asked whether Gallrein would protect the Constitution from unconstitutional executive overreach regardless of who the president is. Gallrein responded by saying he disagreed with the premise of the question and refused to answer it. After the speech, the attendees attempted once more to get their questions answered. That interaction ended with a Gallrein supporter grabbing the hand, phone, and wrist of the person recording in an attempt to stop the recording. These were not people from the Massie campaign, nor professional rabble-rousers — just ordinary Kentuckians trying to get straightforward answers. They only began recording after it became clear the question-and-answer portion would not be a genuine Q&A. The jumps in the video at the end are simply from the recorder accidentally turning her phone on and off during the altercation. Other reports from different events include people being denied entry even after RSVPing, with no explanation given. Some attendees say they were turned away because they “just didn’t look right.” It has also been stated that people are leaving these events saying things like, “Well, he didn’t tell me anything,” or “I came in wanting to vote for him, but not after that.” All of this lends credence to the idea that Gallrein is refusing to debate Thomas Massie because he lacks the ability to communicate effectively and hold his own in a potentially hostile environment. The problem, of course, is that Congress is a hostile environment.

Andrew Cooperrider

302,885 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In the interest of full transparency here are the details of my return to the White House Press Briefing room to ask a question from the new media seat: After Karoline Leavitt announced the new media seat and application process I filled out the form and reached out to several individuals who I previously knew from covering the complex with my interest in attending a briefing sometime in the future. They were noncommittal In the last 24 hours they reached out to me to see if I will still interested and I told them I was. *At no point* did I provide any of the questions I intended to ask to the White House and the first time they heard the questions was the first time that you all did during the briefing There was also no agreement or ask on their part as to the number of questions we would cover. I was given the opportunity to open the briefing and prepared 3 separate questions I thought were important 1. The stock market drop and the White House's reaction + whether they would commit to ruling out a recession 2. What message the White House thinks they are sending by trying to primary Thomas Massie 3. To get them on the record as to the legal standard they are using to deport Mahmoud Khalil I prepared those questions to reflect the concerns of Americans right now on the economy, concerns within the party as to what the standard is for Trump to intervene against you, and also to ask a question relating to a free speech issue which has animated online discourse in the last 24 hours I believe it is important to set a standard for independent media to ask questions that reflect why we became popular in the first place: Meeting people where they are at and asking questions about things that really effect them I want to thank the White House staff and Karoline Leavitt for inviting me to the briefing room and hope to return at some point in the future. I look forward to seeing others in the seat and setting a better standard than the legacy media Below is the full exchange I had with Karoline and a photo we took after the briefing
5:34

In the interest of full transparency here are the details of my return to the White House Press Briefing room to ask a question from the new media seat: After Karoline Leavitt announced the new media seat and application process I filled out the form and reached out to several individuals who I previously knew from covering the complex with my interest in attending a briefing sometime in the future. They were noncommittal In the last 24 hours they reached out to me to see if I will still interested and I told them I was. *At no point* did I provide any of the questions I intended to ask to the White House and the first time they heard the questions was the first time that you all did during the briefing There was also no agreement or ask on their part as to the number of questions we would cover. I was given the opportunity to open the briefing and prepared 3 separate questions I thought were important 1. The stock market drop and the White House's reaction + whether they would commit to ruling out a recession 2. What message the White House thinks they are sending by trying to primary Thomas Massie 3. To get them on the record as to the legal standard they are using to deport Mahmoud Khalil I prepared those questions to reflect the concerns of Americans right now on the economy, concerns within the party as to what the standard is for Trump to intervene against you, and also to ask a question relating to a free speech issue which has animated online discourse in the last 24 hours I believe it is important to set a standard for independent media to ask questions that reflect why we became popular in the first place: Meeting people where they are at and asking questions about things that really effect them I want to thank the White House staff and Karoline Leavitt for inviting me to the briefing room and hope to return at some point in the future. I look forward to seeing others in the seat and setting a better standard than the legacy media Below is the full exchange I had with Karoline and a photo we took after the briefing

Saagar Enjeti

413,827 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NIGERIANS, THIS TINUBU CHICAGO CASE JUST TOOK A NEW TURN. 👀 Take your mind off the FBI filing for a moment. Focus on this VIDEO evidence. What makes this video particularly interesting is who is speaking. Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. has just released another update on the Tinubu Chicago case. But unlike everything we’ve seen so far… This one isn’t a court document - it’s a video. Recorded at an APC political event in Nigeria. With President Tinubu present. And in that video, a man identified as Adewale Tinubu - reportedly President Tinubu’s nephew - publicly discusses the Chicago case. Now listen carefully to what he says. He reportedly states: “I did that case in Chicago. It was one of my first legal matters.” He then describes personally urging President Tinubu to settle the case. Interesting, right? But here is where things get VERY interesting. The official court record for that Chicago case identifies Patrick S. Coffey, Esq. as the attorney representing Tinubu. Not Adewale Tinubu. There is no court appearance under Adewale Tinubu’s name. No pleading bearing his name. No signature. No filing identifying him as counsel. At least, not in the official court record identified in this filing. So we have a very simple question: Why does a man publicly describe himself as having “done” the Chicago case when the official court record does not identify him as Tinubu’s attorney in that proceeding? There may be an explanation. Perhaps he was involved in some capacity that did not require appearing as counsel of record. Perhaps “I did that case” was being used loosely. Or perhaps there is something else we don’t yet know. That is precisely why this needs to be clarified. And this matters because of what is happening in the FBI FOIA case. Remember the last post I made on this case? Von Batten argued that Tinubu’s privacy position is weakened by the fact that the Nigerian Presidency itself publicly discussed the FBI records and the court case. Now there is another piece of public material. A VIDEO. At an APC political event. With Tinubu present. And his own reported nephew publicly discussing the Chicago case. So the question of privacy becomes even more interesting. Tinubu is asking a US federal court to protect records as private. Yet people within his own political and family circle are publicly discussing matters connected to the case. Can you claim something is private in court while people close to you are publicly discussing it? That is now an issue the court can potentially consider. And Von Batten is not simply posting the video on social media. He is seeking to put the video transcript before the court as part of his supplemental evidentiary exhibits. If the court accepts the filing, the judge will have before her: ➡️ The FBI’s confirmation of 399 pages of responsive records ➡️ Investigative material involving surveillance, undercover operations, cooperating witnesses and other matters ➡️ Wiretap recordings the FBI says were compiled during an investigation involving heroin-trafficking crimes ➡️ Von Batten’s argument concerning the Nigerian Presidency’s public statement ➡️ And now, a video in which Tinubu’s reported nephew publicly discusses the Chicago case Think about that. This case has moved from: “What does the FBI have?” to: “What does the FBI have - and what have people connected to Tinubu publicly said about it?” And there is one question I really want answered: If Adewale Tinubu was involved in that Chicago case, in what capacity was he involved? Because the official court record identified in the filing does not show him as counsel of record. That discrepancy deserves an explanation. And if the video is being presented to a US federal court as evidence, the court can decide what weight, if any, to give it. We don’t need to speculate. We need to look at the documents. Watch the video. Read the transcript. Check the court record. And ask the questions. We deserve the truth.
0:32

NIGERIANS, THIS TINUBU CHICAGO CASE JUST TOOK A NEW TURN. 👀 Take your mind off the FBI filing for a moment. Focus on this VIDEO evidence. What makes this video particularly interesting is who is speaking. Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. has just released another update on the Tinubu Chicago case. But unlike everything we’ve seen so far… This one isn’t a court document - it’s a video. Recorded at an APC political event in Nigeria. With President Tinubu present. And in that video, a man identified as Adewale Tinubu - reportedly President Tinubu’s nephew - publicly discusses the Chicago case. Now listen carefully to what he says. He reportedly states: “I did that case in Chicago. It was one of my first legal matters.” He then describes personally urging President Tinubu to settle the case. Interesting, right? But here is where things get VERY interesting. The official court record for that Chicago case identifies Patrick S. Coffey, Esq. as the attorney representing Tinubu. Not Adewale Tinubu. There is no court appearance under Adewale Tinubu’s name. No pleading bearing his name. No signature. No filing identifying him as counsel. At least, not in the official court record identified in this filing. So we have a very simple question: Why does a man publicly describe himself as having “done” the Chicago case when the official court record does not identify him as Tinubu’s attorney in that proceeding? There may be an explanation. Perhaps he was involved in some capacity that did not require appearing as counsel of record. Perhaps “I did that case” was being used loosely. Or perhaps there is something else we don’t yet know. That is precisely why this needs to be clarified. And this matters because of what is happening in the FBI FOIA case. Remember the last post I made on this case? Von Batten argued that Tinubu’s privacy position is weakened by the fact that the Nigerian Presidency itself publicly discussed the FBI records and the court case. Now there is another piece of public material. A VIDEO. At an APC political event. With Tinubu present. And his own reported nephew publicly discussing the Chicago case. So the question of privacy becomes even more interesting. Tinubu is asking a US federal court to protect records as private. Yet people within his own political and family circle are publicly discussing matters connected to the case. Can you claim something is private in court while people close to you are publicly discussing it? That is now an issue the court can potentially consider. And Von Batten is not simply posting the video on social media. He is seeking to put the video transcript before the court as part of his supplemental evidentiary exhibits. If the court accepts the filing, the judge will have before her: ➡️ The FBI’s confirmation of 399 pages of responsive records ➡️ Investigative material involving surveillance, undercover operations, cooperating witnesses and other matters ➡️ Wiretap recordings the FBI says were compiled during an investigation involving heroin-trafficking crimes ➡️ Von Batten’s argument concerning the Nigerian Presidency’s public statement ➡️ And now, a video in which Tinubu’s reported nephew publicly discusses the Chicago case Think about that. This case has moved from: “What does the FBI have?” to: “What does the FBI have - and what have people connected to Tinubu publicly said about it?” And there is one question I really want answered: If Adewale Tinubu was involved in that Chicago case, in what capacity was he involved? Because the official court record identified in the filing does not show him as counsel of record. That discrepancy deserves an explanation. And if the video is being presented to a US federal court as evidence, the court can decide what weight, if any, to give it. We don’t need to speculate. We need to look at the documents. Watch the video. Read the transcript. Check the court record. And ask the questions. We deserve the truth.

Oluwakemi Oyefeso

74,252 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

In 1983 the BBC put a reporter in front of a man who spent his lunch breaks in a pub he did not drink in. He went for the arcade machine. He beat each new game within 2 or 3 days, and the pub only changed them once a month, so he went home and worked at the keyboard 20 to 40 hours a week, frequently straight through the night. The programme called these people addicts. Watching it now, the label is the least interesting thing in it, because 1 of the 3 people interviewed accidentally explains the entire mechanism. His name is Graham Hawker, and he is asked a simple question. What is the actual thrill of playing against a computer. His answer is the only real piece of psychology in the film. The machine is perfect. It never makes an error. Therefore anything that goes wrong is unambiguously yours, and you are not playing a game at all, you are trying to prove you are as flawless as the thing opposite you. That is a textbook description of a variable schedule of reinforcement married to a system that never gives you an excuse. Skinner showed decades earlier that unpredictable rewards produce far more persistent behaviour than reliable ones. What Hawker adds is the part Skinner's pigeons could not: an opponent so consistent that blame has nowhere to go except inward. There is no bad referee, no unfair bounce, no bad day. Every loss is evidence about you. The first man is asked whether he will ever use the program he is spending 6 months of his life writing. His answer starts with 2 words that make the reporter laugh. Asked why he is doing it then, he replies in 6 words, and it is a question, not an answer, and it is the oldest defence there is for doing something useless extremely well. His wife is sitting there for all of this. She describes lying half awake at 5 in the morning and hearing a sound from the spare room. She reproduces the sound out loud. Then she says a sentence about a room of his own that is far heavier than anything the reporter manages in 8 minutes. The third person is a woman running a sweet shop, and she produces the turn that makes the film worth the time. The computer collapsed 4 or 5 hours of nightly paperwork into seconds. What she did with the recovered hours is not what anybody expects, and she lays the evidence out on the shop counter for the camera. By the end of 1982 there were roughly 700 thousand of these machines in British homes, and salesmen were selling them on the grounds that they would help children with schoolwork. The reporter closes on the thing the salesmen were leaving out. 42 years later it is the only prediction in the film that landed.
8:00

In 1983 the BBC put a reporter in front of a man who spent his lunch breaks in a pub he did not drink in. He went for the arcade machine. He beat each new game within 2 or 3 days, and the pub only changed them once a month, so he went home and worked at the keyboard 20 to 40 hours a week, frequently straight through the night. The programme called these people addicts. Watching it now, the label is the least interesting thing in it, because 1 of the 3 people interviewed accidentally explains the entire mechanism. His name is Graham Hawker, and he is asked a simple question. What is the actual thrill of playing against a computer. His answer is the only real piece of psychology in the film. The machine is perfect. It never makes an error. Therefore anything that goes wrong is unambiguously yours, and you are not playing a game at all, you are trying to prove you are as flawless as the thing opposite you. That is a textbook description of a variable schedule of reinforcement married to a system that never gives you an excuse. Skinner showed decades earlier that unpredictable rewards produce far more persistent behaviour than reliable ones. What Hawker adds is the part Skinner's pigeons could not: an opponent so consistent that blame has nowhere to go except inward. There is no bad referee, no unfair bounce, no bad day. Every loss is evidence about you. The first man is asked whether he will ever use the program he is spending 6 months of his life writing. His answer starts with 2 words that make the reporter laugh. Asked why he is doing it then, he replies in 6 words, and it is a question, not an answer, and it is the oldest defence there is for doing something useless extremely well. His wife is sitting there for all of this. She describes lying half awake at 5 in the morning and hearing a sound from the spare room. She reproduces the sound out loud. Then she says a sentence about a room of his own that is far heavier than anything the reporter manages in 8 minutes. The third person is a woman running a sweet shop, and she produces the turn that makes the film worth the time. The computer collapsed 4 or 5 hours of nightly paperwork into seconds. What she did with the recovered hours is not what anybody expects, and she lays the evidence out on the shop counter for the camera. By the end of 1982 there were roughly 700 thousand of these machines in British homes, and salesmen were selling them on the grounds that they would help children with schoolwork. The reporter closes on the thing the salesmen were leaving out. 42 years later it is the only prediction in the film that landed.

Stefan.

486,872 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen