Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
There is a clear ideological difference between the NDC and NPP in policy formation. NPP: Implemented Free SHS without any consultationwith stake holders, and without a policy document Implemented the E-Levy, 1 District 1 Factory, 1 Village 1 Dam, planting for food and jobs among others Without stake holders... show more
44,610 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
11 Yorum

Better the second. Policy you feel part of is more likely to be obeyed and supported by the electorate. The first scenario was an unmitigated disaster.

I agree but for so reason the NPP has been faithful to this ideology for decades without any sense of deviating in spite of significant challenges and failures they've suffered in this approach.

State legislatures kick off in January, and I’m sharing 3 key policies to boost economies and help citizens thrive in a special edition of This Week’s Economy. Substack subscribers also get my Let People Prosper Policy Agenda—free! 🚀 📈 #Economy

Engaging stakeholders is the best, I was at one of the energy sector stakeholder meetings where we were asked how we would want the privatization part of ECG should take and if you hear ideas people were bringing up, you would be surprised. It’s smart to engage

I'm glad everyday Ghanaians like yourselves are actually involved in the process and this is not just rhetorics.

Let's look at the aftermath of the policy formation of the two parties. People wanted to be involved in governance, but NPP said they had the men and did it all by themselves. Eventually, even the Free SHS graduates voted against them. NDC is gov for the people, by the people.

I see.

Democracy is government for the people. You can’t just hide under your room and come out with anything without consulting the people who voted for you. That’s is 1D1F FSHS all having series of problems till date

💯💯

You dey Range Rover inside de talk this tin… masa😁😁

It's all settings no be my own. 🤣🤣
