正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

There is a clear pattern in how the so-called “murpokku” DMK ecosystem operates. Whenever a real issue is raised, the focus is systematically diverted. Instead of accountability, they manufacture narratives. What is more concerning is that many of these voices are not neutral or principled. They actively engage in...

rajakumaari's profile picture

Sonia Arunkumar

160,409 subscribers

22,638 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Alabama got called out by an anonymous coach. Chris Marler agrees: "The issue is they are not as tough as they used to be, and the physicality this team -- it's not that they don't have it, they go out of their way to not find it." Full show:
2:17

Alabama got called out by an anonymous coach. Chris Marler agrees: "The issue is they are not as tough as they used to be, and the physicality this team -- it's not that they don't have it, they go out of their way to not find it." Full show:

SEC Mike

97,181 次观看 • 1 个月前

The problem is not Judaism or Islam. The problem is not Jews or Muslims. There is no such thing as the Palestinian problem. There is a problem and it is the existence of Zionism and Israel. There is a problem called Israel, there is a problem called occupation. The region has a big problem called Zionism and absolutely everyone needs to fight against this ideology.
0:56

The problem is not Judaism or Islam. The problem is not Jews or Muslims. There is no such thing as the Palestinian problem. There is a problem and it is the existence of Zionism and Israel. There is a problem called Israel, there is a problem called occupation. The region has a big problem called Zionism and absolutely everyone needs to fight against this ideology.

Voice of Rabbis

72,119 次观看 • 1 年前

I think the left is blowing this Signal issue out of proportion. Was it perfect? No. Is it as big of a deal as the left is making it out to be? No. I think there is a higher chance the left is just desperate to get a “win”, so they are going all in on this because they see a bit of daylight.
1:22

I think the left is blowing this Signal issue out of proportion. Was it perfect? No. Is it as big of a deal as the left is making it out to be? No. I think there is a higher chance the left is just desperate to get a “win”, so they are going all in on this because they see a bit of daylight.

Jeffery Mead

36,781 次观看 • 1 年前

AS A WOMAN, I AM DEEPLY OFFENDED WATCHING THIS CLIP. It is disturbing to see women being spoken about as though they are commodities to be acquired or exchanged. Lalit Modi once again reveals a side of himself that many people seem willing to overlook. What breaks me even more is that this conversation is happening on a platform owned by Karishma Mehta, and she's sitting right there moderating it. She could have at least said, "This deeply offends me," or "I would never marry a man who thinks this way," and made it clear that such views are unacceptable. Instead, she chooses to giggle and keep the conversation going for more podcast masala. Was the Pranit More case not enough to remind us of the social responsibility that comes with moderating public conversations? The platform is called Humans of Bombay, yet they are hosting such inhuman conversations without any challenge or pushback. I urge people to call this out. The message needs to be heard loud and clear. This is NOT RIGHT. Normalising such thinking under the guise of entertainment is dangerous, and those with a platform have a responsibility to do better.
0:39

AS A WOMAN, I AM DEEPLY OFFENDED WATCHING THIS CLIP. It is disturbing to see women being spoken about as though they are commodities to be acquired or exchanged. Lalit Modi once again reveals a side of himself that many people seem willing to overlook. What breaks me even more is that this conversation is happening on a platform owned by Karishma Mehta, and she's sitting right there moderating it. She could have at least said, "This deeply offends me," or "I would never marry a man who thinks this way," and made it clear that such views are unacceptable. Instead, she chooses to giggle and keep the conversation going for more podcast masala. Was the Pranit More case not enough to remind us of the social responsibility that comes with moderating public conversations? The platform is called Humans of Bombay, yet they are hosting such inhuman conversations without any challenge or pushback. I urge people to call this out. The message needs to be heard loud and clear. This is NOT RIGHT. Normalising such thinking under the guise of entertainment is dangerous, and those with a platform have a responsibility to do better.

Monica Verma

12,807 次观看 • 26 天前

While everyone was engaged with the FOX News sound bites and “in shock” that the CIA “raided” DNI’s office and “stole” documents, they missed the real take away. I called it out on Badlands Daily the day after the testimony with ALPHAWARRIOR . And then again the following Monday with Zak Paine CIA is subordinate to DNI and CERTAINLY subordinate to President Trump. At least that’s how it is SUPPOSED to be. You can’t “splinter” this agency into a thousand pieces. It already is. It’s how they operate. It needs to be abolished OR there needs to be extreme forms of accountability for this type of abuse insubordination that is teetering on the fine line of sedition. Catherine Herridge is a gem! Glad she’s doing her own thing and blowing up stories like this!!
2:20

While everyone was engaged with the FOX News sound bites and “in shock” that the CIA “raided” DNI’s office and “stole” documents, they missed the real take away. I called it out on Badlands Daily the day after the testimony with ALPHAWARRIOR . And then again the following Monday with Zak Paine CIA is subordinate to DNI and CERTAINLY subordinate to President Trump. At least that’s how it is SUPPOSED to be. You can’t “splinter” this agency into a thousand pieces. It already is. It’s how they operate. It needs to be abolished OR there needs to be extreme forms of accountability for this type of abuse insubordination that is teetering on the fine line of sedition. Catherine Herridge is a gem! Glad she’s doing her own thing and blowing up stories like this!!

CannCon

36,771 次观看 • 1 个月前

ALERT: Authorities are "going out of their way" to ensure that the public understands that the individual currently detained in connection with Nancy Guthries disappearance is not a suspect: "Sources making it very clear at this time, in fact, they are going out of their way at this time to make sure that this is not being called an arrest, that this person is not being called a person of interest, that this person is not to be called a suspect, at least for now."
1:38

ALERT: Authorities are "going out of their way" to ensure that the public understands that the individual currently detained in connection with Nancy Guthries disappearance is not a suspect: "Sources making it very clear at this time, in fact, they are going out of their way at this time to make sure that this is not being called an arrest, that this person is not being called a person of interest, that this person is not to be called a suspect, at least for now."

E X X ➠A L E R T S

69,543 次观看 • 5 个月前

.Jack Poso 🇺🇸 is speaking the truth here. "Ladies and gentlemen, it will not stop until it is stopped. The networks are there. The networks are in place. The funding is in place." "All of this needs to be investigated,it needs to be pressurized and it needs to be wiped clean." "Anyone involved in inciting or conspiracy, to incite one of these riots and that’s what they are. They are planned riots. They need to be taken down. It’s really as simple as that."
1:07

.Jack Poso 🇺🇸 is speaking the truth here. "Ladies and gentlemen, it will not stop until it is stopped. The networks are there. The networks are in place. The funding is in place." "All of this needs to be investigated,it needs to be pressurized and it needs to be wiped clean." "Anyone involved in inciting or conspiracy, to incite one of these riots and that’s what they are. They are planned riots. They need to be taken down. It’s really as simple as that."

Gunther Eagleman™

22,251 次观看 • 9 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi | On AAP and DMK not attending the INDIA alliance meeting today, Congress leader Udit Raj says, “This will weaken them... We do not want to see the DMK weakened. If they are not part of the INDIA Alliance, two scenarios may arise: either they remain neutral, or they support the BJP. Remaining neutral is, in a way, tantamount to supporting the BJP. This is because the INDIA alliance would be weakened, and ideologically, there is absolutely no alignment between the DMK and the BJP. So, we still maintain that they should be part of the alliance if they wish to save the Constitution and the reservation. After all, reservation is a crucial matter of social justice, and in Tamil Nadu, that party was founded on the principles of social justice. As for the AAP, it is grappling with internal contradictions; look at the reports coming out of Punjab… Sooner or later, if it becomes significantly weakened, it might possibly merge into the BJP…”
2:48

#WATCH | Delhi | On AAP and DMK not attending the INDIA alliance meeting today, Congress leader Udit Raj says, “This will weaken them... We do not want to see the DMK weakened. If they are not part of the INDIA Alliance, two scenarios may arise: either they remain neutral, or they support the BJP. Remaining neutral is, in a way, tantamount to supporting the BJP. This is because the INDIA alliance would be weakened, and ideologically, there is absolutely no alignment between the DMK and the BJP. So, we still maintain that they should be part of the alliance if they wish to save the Constitution and the reservation. After all, reservation is a crucial matter of social justice, and in Tamil Nadu, that party was founded on the principles of social justice. As for the AAP, it is grappling with internal contradictions; look at the reports coming out of Punjab… Sooner or later, if it becomes significantly weakened, it might possibly merge into the BJP…”

ANI

83,648 次观看 • 1 个月前

There is a moment in every man's life where the question is not what is strategic, not what is convenient, not what is politically comfortable, the question is simply, what is right and what is wrong. These sources did not step forward for fame. They stepped forward because they believed in something greater than themselves. They infiltrated one of the most brutal regimes in the Western Hemisphere. Their families — including children — are now being hunted because they chose to stand on the right side of history. Those are real people, in real danger, right now. The United States of America asked these men and women to trust us. They did and the silence they have received in return is not a bureaucratic oversight. It is a moral failure. Plain and simple. I have spent my life in service to this country. I know what we ask of people who work in the shadows. I know the weight of that ask and I know that when a nation stops honoring its word to the people who sacrificed the most, it has lost something far more valuable than any intelligence asset. This is not complicated. These people did right by us. Now we do right by them.
0:27

There is a moment in every man's life where the question is not what is strategic, not what is convenient, not what is politically comfortable, the question is simply, what is right and what is wrong. These sources did not step forward for fame. They stepped forward because they believed in something greater than themselves. They infiltrated one of the most brutal regimes in the Western Hemisphere. Their families — including children — are now being hunted because they chose to stand on the right side of history. Those are real people, in real danger, right now. The United States of America asked these men and women to trust us. They did and the silence they have received in return is not a bureaucratic oversight. It is a moral failure. Plain and simple. I have spent my life in service to this country. I know what we ask of people who work in the shadows. I know the weight of that ask and I know that when a nation stops honoring its word to the people who sacrificed the most, it has lost something far more valuable than any intelligence asset. This is not complicated. These people did right by us. Now we do right by them.

General Mike Flynn

61,674 次观看 • 2 个月前

John Mearsheimer explains how the Israel lobby in the United States operates: “This is not a case of all these politicians loving Israel and feeling they have to support Israel because it shares our values or is a strategic asset they do it in good part out of FEAR, fear that the lobby will put its crosshairs on them…”
3:28

John Mearsheimer explains how the Israel lobby in the United States operates: “This is not a case of all these politicians loving Israel and feeling they have to support Israel because it shares our values or is a strategic asset they do it in good part out of FEAR, fear that the lobby will put its crosshairs on them…”

Going Underground

157,234 次观看 • 1 年前

This is what I call reverse mysogny. Funny when I looked it up by AI it came up with this. "While the term "reverse misogyny" is not a standard academic term, it is often used to describe misandry, which is defined as the hatred, contempt, or prejudice against men. Misandry functions as a counterpart to misogyny, but many sociologists argue that it cannot be considered "reverse" oppression because it lacks the institutionalized, structural, and historical power imbalances associated with sexism." So basically saying that men should just accept the bullying and harassment by females? This video to me is basically harrasment because she is pointing out he is a man and wanting him to feel bad for being one. Hypocrisy is what he calls it out to be and I second that.
1:32

This is what I call reverse mysogny. Funny when I looked it up by AI it came up with this. "While the term "reverse misogyny" is not a standard academic term, it is often used to describe misandry, which is defined as the hatred, contempt, or prejudice against men. Misandry functions as a counterpart to misogyny, but many sociologists argue that it cannot be considered "reverse" oppression because it lacks the institutionalized, structural, and historical power imbalances associated with sexism." So basically saying that men should just accept the bullying and harassment by females? This video to me is basically harrasment because she is pointing out he is a man and wanting him to feel bad for being one. Hypocrisy is what he calls it out to be and I second that.

What the fuck 8.32

54,449 次观看 • 4 个月前

There’s a certain irony in Meghan Markle positioning herself as the “most trolled person in the world” over the past decade. It’s a claim designed to evoke sympathy, to frame her as uniquely targeted, and to suggest that the overwhelming public reaction to her is rooted purely in cruelty or bias. But that narrative leaves out a crucial question that she consistently avoids addressing: why? Public figures across politics, entertainment, and royalty face scrutiny. It comes with visibility, influence, and the power to shape narratives. But sustained, global dislike on the scale she describes doesn’t simply appear out of nowhere, and it certainly doesn’t persist for years without cause. Reducing it all to “trolling” dismisses the very real criticisms people have raised about her behavior, inconsistencies, and repeated attempts to control public perception. More telling is the consistent refusal to engage in self-reflection. The pattern has been consistent: criticism is reframed as harassment, disagreement is labeled as hate, and accountability is sidestepped in favor of victimhood. It creates a loop where every negative reaction becomes proof of persecution rather than an opportunity for introspection. There is also a growing disconnect between the image she tries to project and how she is perceived. Carefully curated appearances, controlled interviews, and polished messaging can only go so far when they clash with what people observe over time. Audiences are not as easily managed as they once were. Patterns are noticed. Contradictions are remembered. At some point, the question shifts from “why are people reacting this way?” to “why is there such resistance to examining the role she herself plays in that reaction?” Because being widely criticized and being widely disliked are not the same as being unfairly targeted. One invites sympathy. The other invites scrutiny. If there is any path to changing that perception, it does not lie in repeating the claim of being the most trolled person in the world. It lies in something far less comfortable: taking an honest look in the mirror and asking whether the criticism is earned. Until that uncomfortable mirror-gazing happens, the narrative will remain what it feels like today: less a story of victimhood, and more one of deflection.
0:28

There’s a certain irony in Meghan Markle positioning herself as the “most trolled person in the world” over the past decade. It’s a claim designed to evoke sympathy, to frame her as uniquely targeted, and to suggest that the overwhelming public reaction to her is rooted purely in cruelty or bias. But that narrative leaves out a crucial question that she consistently avoids addressing: why? Public figures across politics, entertainment, and royalty face scrutiny. It comes with visibility, influence, and the power to shape narratives. But sustained, global dislike on the scale she describes doesn’t simply appear out of nowhere, and it certainly doesn’t persist for years without cause. Reducing it all to “trolling” dismisses the very real criticisms people have raised about her behavior, inconsistencies, and repeated attempts to control public perception. More telling is the consistent refusal to engage in self-reflection. The pattern has been consistent: criticism is reframed as harassment, disagreement is labeled as hate, and accountability is sidestepped in favor of victimhood. It creates a loop where every negative reaction becomes proof of persecution rather than an opportunity for introspection. There is also a growing disconnect between the image she tries to project and how she is perceived. Carefully curated appearances, controlled interviews, and polished messaging can only go so far when they clash with what people observe over time. Audiences are not as easily managed as they once were. Patterns are noticed. Contradictions are remembered. At some point, the question shifts from “why are people reacting this way?” to “why is there such resistance to examining the role she herself plays in that reaction?” Because being widely criticized and being widely disliked are not the same as being unfairly targeted. One invites sympathy. The other invites scrutiny. If there is any path to changing that perception, it does not lie in repeating the claim of being the most trolled person in the world. It lies in something far less comfortable: taking an honest look in the mirror and asking whether the criticism is earned. Until that uncomfortable mirror-gazing happens, the narrative will remain what it feels like today: less a story of victimhood, and more one of deflection.

Queen Esther

28,877 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is the funeral of a young protester who was killed by Islamic Regime last week. Traditionally in Iran, funerals are marked by sorrow: sad music, Islamic sermons, and recitations from the Quran. But here, something completely different is happening. The music being played is the kind normally heard at weddings. People are clapping. They are dancing. At a funeral! This is not celebration, it is protest. By rejecting religious rituals and replacing them with wedding music, people are sending a clear and defiant message: how deeply they despise this so-called “religious” government, how strongly they oppose the regime and its imposed ideology. There is hardly any way more difficult, more profound, or more unmistakable to express opposition to this regime, and yet, the people of Iran continue down this path. They do not retreat. They do not back down. #IranMassacre
1:09

This is the funeral of a young protester who was killed by Islamic Regime last week. Traditionally in Iran, funerals are marked by sorrow: sad music, Islamic sermons, and recitations from the Quran. But here, something completely different is happening. The music being played is the kind normally heard at weddings. People are clapping. They are dancing. At a funeral! This is not celebration, it is protest. By rejecting religious rituals and replacing them with wedding music, people are sending a clear and defiant message: how deeply they despise this so-called “religious” government, how strongly they oppose the regime and its imposed ideology. There is hardly any way more difficult, more profound, or more unmistakable to express opposition to this regime, and yet, the people of Iran continue down this path. They do not retreat. They do not back down. #IranMassacre

Hemad Nazari

235,641 次观看 • 5 个月前

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.
1:27

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 次观看 • 6 个月前

The most dangerous and deadly organisations in India is DMK and the most deadly movement is Dravidianist. Dravidianist is one of the more dangerous movements than the Kashmiri or Khalistani movements. It is a secularized Christian movement. One can easily identify the culprits in Kashmiri or Khalistani movements, as they pick up the guns. But a Dravidianist movement is a part of DEMOCRATIC ECOSYSTEM and one *"can't*" easily identify the problem. It's like a CANCER.
0:50

The most dangerous and deadly organisations in India is DMK and the most deadly movement is Dravidianist. Dravidianist is one of the more dangerous movements than the Kashmiri or Khalistani movements. It is a secularized Christian movement. One can easily identify the culprits in Kashmiri or Khalistani movements, as they pick up the guns. But a Dravidianist movement is a part of DEMOCRATIC ECOSYSTEM and one *"can't*" easily identify the problem. It's like a CANCER.

महावीर जैन, ಮಹಾವೀರ ಜೈನ, Mahaveer Jain

31,850 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Marco Rubio just laid it out clearly. A U.S. visa is not a right. It is a privilege. If you are visiting this country and engage in activities that are against U.S. interests, that visa can be revoked. That is not radical. That is sovereignty. Every nation on earth controls who enters and under what conditions they can stay. Rubio’s point is simple: follow the terms of your visa, respect the laws, or lose the privilege. Strong borders. Clear rules. No apologies. That is how a serious country operates. 🔥
0:31

🚨 Marco Rubio just laid it out clearly. A U.S. visa is not a right. It is a privilege. If you are visiting this country and engage in activities that are against U.S. interests, that visa can be revoked. That is not radical. That is sovereignty. Every nation on earth controls who enters and under what conditions they can stay. Rubio’s point is simple: follow the terms of your visa, respect the laws, or lose the privilege. Strong borders. Clear rules. No apologies. That is how a serious country operates. 🔥

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

24,181 次观看 • 4 个月前

"The problem is not that they are winning, or winning big, or that they have been in power for 10 years or in so many states. This country has seen much larger governments. The problem is that the BJP wants more than just your vote. They want to leave an ideological imprint. They want psychological dominance over you. Whether you want my vote or not, that's a past issue. Now, after you've given me your vote, they want to dictate everything: 'You perform the puja, wear these clothes, eat this food, associate with these people, don't associate with those, be friends with these, be friends with those.' This is what it has come to. So, when any dispensation tries to go beyond what is legitimately their job, when you infringe by exceeding the role of the government or a political party, that's something to be wary of." - Prashant Kishor.
1:00

"The problem is not that they are winning, or winning big, or that they have been in power for 10 years or in so many states. This country has seen much larger governments. The problem is that the BJP wants more than just your vote. They want to leave an ideological imprint. They want psychological dominance over you. Whether you want my vote or not, that's a past issue. Now, after you've given me your vote, they want to dictate everything: 'You perform the puja, wear these clothes, eat this food, associate with these people, don't associate with those, be friends with these, be friends with those.' This is what it has come to. So, when any dispensation tries to go beyond what is legitimately their job, when you infringe by exceeding the role of the government or a political party, that's something to be wary of." - Prashant Kishor.

Ravi

97,720 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 NASA IS LIGHTING FIRES ON THE MOON — WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY HIDING UP THERE? This is becoming increasingly strange. While NASA and private companies push forward with new lunar missions, many are asking a serious question: Why are they conducting what appear to be fire or energy experiments on the moon? Some see it as nothing more than a massive money grab. Others like David Icke believe something far deeper is going on. That the moon may not be natural at all. That it was brought here, could be hollow, and is being used as a massive sensor or control system for humanity. The moon has long been surrounded by anomalies that defy conventional explanation. The official narrative has more holes than it has answers. And many of the public faces of these missions look and feel more like actors than explorers. Why the hell is NASA lighting fires on the moon, and what are they really using it for?
3:07

🚨 NASA IS LIGHTING FIRES ON THE MOON — WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY HIDING UP THERE? This is becoming increasingly strange. While NASA and private companies push forward with new lunar missions, many are asking a serious question: Why are they conducting what appear to be fire or energy experiments on the moon? Some see it as nothing more than a massive money grab. Others like David Icke believe something far deeper is going on. That the moon may not be natural at all. That it was brought here, could be hollow, and is being used as a massive sensor or control system for humanity. The moon has long been surrounded by anomalies that defy conventional explanation. The official narrative has more holes than it has answers. And many of the public faces of these missions look and feel more like actors than explorers. Why the hell is NASA lighting fires on the moon, and what are they really using it for?

HustleBitch

20,719 次观看 • 4 天前