Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

There is a huge difference between parental consent with basic human needs versus a photo. Especially a naked photo.. is that not child pornography?! The Good wife

434,875 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

David Smith's profile picture
David Smith4 days ago

Another blue city pushing child porn as art.

Dao Stanxa's profile picture
Dao Stanxa5 days ago

White people love their child pornography. They will end nations to protect it.

greg william's profile picture
greg william4 days ago

I would actually sue them and then sue my mother for doing that make it so financially expensive that my mother will destroy all the evidence

PickleMick's profile picture
PickleMick4 days ago

Women are allowed to take pictures of their naked children.....but let a man do the same. Even for art. They will eat him alive. A womans life is super fucking easy

John Zinscape @ Waiting Waiting Forever's profile picture
John Zinscape @ Waiting Waiting Forever4 days ago

Nudity does not necessarily constitute porn, and nudists are legitimate. However, in this case you have the subject clearly uncomfortable not just with the fact that those pictures exist, but they’re displayed in a museum, with his name attached. Even nudists might call that out.

Josh's profile picture
Josh5 days ago

@grok what episode is this

XimenaBg's profile picture
XimenaBg5 days ago

A decent amount of Jewish mentioning in this episode 😭😭😭

PragmaticMonkey's profile picture
PragmaticMonkey4 days ago

Wow… I think maybe that script was based on this artist that learned about only when I tried to identify art hanging behind Jamie Lee Curtis. It drew me into a rabbit hole that I wasn’t prepared for.

Riah's profile picture
Riah4 days ago

I hated this series. I hated her. An 8 year old doesn’t and can’t consent. The mother doesn’t need shit to post those pictures. That’s why I hated the show. It was shit.

Related Videos