正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

There is a reason why he is always relevant

74,615 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Amit Srivastav 的头像
Amit Srivastav1 年前

It is necessary to be aggressive if your neighbouring countries are like Pakistan and China

Lohpurush Tony Stark 的头像
Lohpurush Tony Stark1 年前

No other option

Iron_Sore 的头像
Iron_Sore1 年前

If a country like America was afraid of him then there is no need to provide proof of his intelligence. He was , is , will always relevant.

Lohpurush Tony Stark 的头像
Lohpurush Tony Stark1 年前

Shi kha bhaijaan

Rishi Jha 的头像
Rishi Jha1 年前

This was Napoleon Bonaparte 's strategy and tactic in every war and which is why he was so successful almost every time(better success rate than Alexander, Charlemagne and Caeser). Flak the enemy from all the sides. Work of art! Why Indian army doesn't do this boggles my mind.

Lohpurush Tony Stark 的头像
Lohpurush Tony Stark1 年前

Politicians ko nobel prize chahiye

Seemless Social 的头像
Seemless Social2 年前

Your link in bio is losing you clicks. ⚠️ Watch this to find out why 👇 Seemless works 2X better than Linktree for more clicks from social to site.

kushal_7 的头像
kushal_71 年前

Best way of defense is to attack

Lohpurush Tony Stark 的头像
Lohpurush Tony Stark1 年前

Defensive offence imo

Sunil Rathi 的头像
Sunil Rathi1 年前

Something is wrong - When pakistan attacked in 1965 Lal Bahadur Shastri was PM & When Nehru was PM , Pakistan had attacked (1948) Chaudhary was not commander.

Sumit 的头像
Sumit1 年前

@Singh_Armaan_

相关视频