Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

"There is no climate emergency." That's the message from over 2,000 scientists and professionals worldwide, including Nobel laureate John Clauser, MIT's Richard Lindzen and Emeritus Professor at the University of Melbourne Ian Plimer. They all say climate science has become too political, and that the models behind global policy... show more

Electroverse

42,689 subscribers

34,724 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Former climate alarmist, Tom Harris: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between CO2 and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Credit: International Climate Science Coalition Laura Ingraham

Former climate alarmist, Tom Harris: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between CO2 and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Credit: International Climate Science Coalition Laura Ingraham

Wide Awake Media

676,183 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

234,182 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There is no climate emergency; it was all about the money.💰 Just look at your electric bill. Prof. Ian Plimer “There is NO climate emergency. It’s a total con — not backed by real science.” His killer point: “Humans only produce 3% of annual CO₂ emissions. 97% is NATURAL.” “If you claim that our tiny 3% drives global warming… then PROVE the other 97% from volcanoes, oceans, and nature does NOT.”

There is no climate emergency; it was all about the money.💰 Just look at your electric bill. Prof. Ian Plimer “There is NO climate emergency. It’s a total con — not backed by real science.” His killer point: “Humans only produce 3% of annual CO₂ emissions. 97% is NATURAL.” “If you claim that our tiny 3% drives global warming… then PROVE the other 97% from volcanoes, oceans, and nature does NOT.”

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

15,995 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

THE CLIMATE CHANGE LIE: Bill Gates I do not want your money, declares fearless 31 year Harvard Scientist who has scientifically confirmed that CO2 Climate Change theory is a big lie used to control humanity. C02 is the gas of life, they are delusional, global warming is nothing. He goes on to say that John Kerry and Al Gore are talking nonsense about Climate Change, they are not even scientists. They have no idea of the important role that CO2 plays in all life on earth, more CO2 equals more life on planet earth. Bill Gates who is not a scientist, not a doctor and not anyone of intelligence says we have to reduce CO2 to Zero which includes reducing the population because CO2 is warming the earth, this is a blatant lie used to frighten humanity into obedience. Independent scientific papers and independent scientists who have been researching this subject for many years have already proven that CO2 gas is of no concern to life. International Attorney confirms that Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and many other WEF politicians are using Climate Change, Pandemics and Wars to bring about total world control through the United Nations and World Economic Forum. He declares that they must be stopped and should have been stopped a long time ago. Now is the time to unite humanity and defend life and freedom. This is your home, defend planet earth.

THE CLIMATE CHANGE LIE: Bill Gates I do not want your money, declares fearless 31 year Harvard Scientist who has scientifically confirmed that CO2 Climate Change theory is a big lie used to control humanity. C02 is the gas of life, they are delusional, global warming is nothing. He goes on to say that John Kerry and Al Gore are talking nonsense about Climate Change, they are not even scientists. They have no idea of the important role that CO2 plays in all life on earth, more CO2 equals more life on planet earth. Bill Gates who is not a scientist, not a doctor and not anyone of intelligence says we have to reduce CO2 to Zero which includes reducing the population because CO2 is warming the earth, this is a blatant lie used to frighten humanity into obedience. Independent scientific papers and independent scientists who have been researching this subject for many years have already proven that CO2 gas is of no concern to life. International Attorney confirms that Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and many other WEF politicians are using Climate Change, Pandemics and Wars to bring about total world control through the United Nations and World Economic Forum. He declares that they must be stopped and should have been stopped a long time ago. Now is the time to unite humanity and defend life and freedom. This is your home, defend planet earth.

Truth Justice ™

6,322,632 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"This is probably the biggest con that we've ever had." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "There is no climate emergency... It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate." "That has never been addressed."

"This is probably the biggest con that we've ever had." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "There is no climate emergency... It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate." "That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

734,743 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

27,231 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “31,000 Scientists agree that global warming is baloney.” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “I am a Scientist, and I am the FOUNDER, not Co-Founder of The Weather Channel.” ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy? “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “31,000 Scientists agree that global warming is baloney.” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “I am a Scientist, and I am the FOUNDER, not Co-Founder of The Weather Channel.” ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy? “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

HustleBitch

2,746,153 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

770,501 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

We're told climate disasters are getting worse, but the data says the exact opposite. According to the world's leading disaster database, climate-related disasters show no trend since 2000. And climate-related deaths have collapsed by over 98% since 1920, with deaths dropping from nearly 500,000 per year to under 10,000 today. Floods, droughts, storms and wildfires are not increasing. And on top of that, humanity is just far more resilient than it used to be. There is no crisis. Just progress.

We're told climate disasters are getting worse, but the data says the exact opposite. According to the world's leading disaster database, climate-related disasters show no trend since 2000. And climate-related deaths have collapsed by over 98% since 1920, with deaths dropping from nearly 500,000 per year to under 10,000 today. Floods, droughts, storms and wildfires are not increasing. And on top of that, humanity is just far more resilient than it used to be. There is no crisis. Just progress.

Electroverse

12,742 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"There is no climate emergency, but the CO2 famine is very real." "For millions of years CO2 has been dropping to dangerously low levels... If CO2 levels drop below [150 ppm], plants will starve and all life on Earth will die." Credit: John Shewchuk CO2 Coalition

"There is no climate emergency, but the CO2 famine is very real." "For millions of years CO2 has been dropping to dangerously low levels... If CO2 levels drop below [150 ppm], plants will starve and all life on Earth will die." Credit: John Shewchuk CO2 Coalition

Wide Awake Media

64,814 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Retired MIT scientist LAUGHS off the claim that “the science is settled” on climate change. Once you hear this, it becomes clear that anyone insisting “the science is settled” has no idea what they’re talking about: “On the one hand, you’re told the science is settled… but on the other hand, if you read the IPCC reports, they’re pointing out, for instance, that water vapor and clouds are much bigger [greenhouse factors] than CO2, and we don’t understand them at all. So here you have the biggest phenomena we don’t understand at all, but the science is settled. Who knows what that means?” — Richard Lindzen, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Retired MIT scientist LAUGHS off the claim that “the science is settled” on climate change. Once you hear this, it becomes clear that anyone insisting “the science is settled” has no idea what they’re talking about: “On the one hand, you’re told the science is settled… but on the other hand, if you read the IPCC reports, they’re pointing out, for instance, that water vapor and clouds are much bigger [greenhouse factors] than CO2, and we don’t understand them at all. So here you have the biggest phenomena we don’t understand at all, but the science is settled. Who knows what that means?” — Richard Lindzen, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

373,718 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Former climate alarmist explains why there is no "climate crisis". "[There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. At times CO₂ was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare. It's all based on models that don't work."

Former climate alarmist explains why there is no "climate crisis". "[There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. At times CO₂ was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare. It's all based on models that don't work."

Wide Awake Media

51,534 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Michael Shellenberger

114,237 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy?" “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy?" “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

HustleBitch

296,766 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer: The Great CO₂ Fraud Dr. Ian Plimer dismantles the core myth of climate alarmism — that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. He argues that no one has ever demonstrated this causal link. If CO₂ truly drove temperature, then why do the 97% of natural emissions not cause the same effect? Plimer calls it what it is: a scientific fraud from day one. For over two centuries, chemistry has shown that CO₂ is the “gas of life,” not a pollutant or planet-killer. Ice core records reveal that temperature rises first, and only centuries later, CO₂ levels follow — proving the inverse of the mainstream narrative. According to Plimer, the story of “runaway global warming” is not science — it’s propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer: The Great CO₂ Fraud Dr. Ian Plimer dismantles the core myth of climate alarmism — that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. He argues that no one has ever demonstrated this causal link. If CO₂ truly drove temperature, then why do the 97% of natural emissions not cause the same effect? Plimer calls it what it is: a scientific fraud from day one. For over two centuries, chemistry has shown that CO₂ is the “gas of life,” not a pollutant or planet-killer. Ice core records reveal that temperature rises first, and only centuries later, CO₂ levels follow — proving the inverse of the mainstream narrative. According to Plimer, the story of “runaway global warming” is not science — it’s propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Camus

19,003 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Dr Mototaka Nakamura has called climate models mere "toys." They're tuned with guesswork, he says, ignore key drivers like clouds, oceans and the sun, and cannot predict climate. Dr Nakamura is far from fringe. He earned his doctorate at MIT, worked with NASA and Caltech, and spent 25 years studying climate dynamics. "Climate models are Mickey-Mouse mockeries of the real world," he says. And he argues scientists have falsified records to exaggerate recent warming, exaggerations that underpin trillion-dollar policies. Nakamura says meaningful climate forecasting is an impossibility, and that CO2 isn't the control knob.

Dr Mototaka Nakamura has called climate models mere "toys." They're tuned with guesswork, he says, ignore key drivers like clouds, oceans and the sun, and cannot predict climate. Dr Nakamura is far from fringe. He earned his doctorate at MIT, worked with NASA and Caltech, and spent 25 years studying climate dynamics. "Climate models are Mickey-Mouse mockeries of the real world," he says. And he argues scientists have falsified records to exaggerate recent warming, exaggerations that underpin trillion-dollar policies. Nakamura says meaningful climate forecasting is an impossibility, and that CO2 isn't the control knob.

Electroverse

40,848 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

"Today is climate emergency day." Good Morning Britain, one of the UK's most popular breakfast TV shows, goes full climate apocalypse. "It's a day to raise awareness about how short the window is that we have to tackle climate change, to reduce our emissions, to not get to that 1.5 degree value that all of the UN says, and all the climate scientists say, that will mitigate the very worst impacts of climate change." "So the clock here is ticking down, and today it will go below five years for the first time in our history." 🤡

"Today is climate emergency day." Good Morning Britain, one of the UK's most popular breakfast TV shows, goes full climate apocalypse. "It's a day to raise awareness about how short the window is that we have to tackle climate change, to reduce our emissions, to not get to that 1.5 degree value that all of the UN says, and all the climate scientists say, that will mitigate the very worst impacts of climate change." "So the clock here is ticking down, and today it will go below five years for the first time in our history." 🤡

Wide Awake Media

134,215 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I’m starting a new series where I share a chart each day that will help calm climate anxiety. The point of sharing these is to show the average person that the science around climate change is complex and it is not an end-of-the-world scenario. These charts are ones I’ve saved over the years, that have helped me understand what the mainstream media does not cover. The more I’ve dug into the science and the models that have not come true, the more I’ve realized climate change is a totally adaptable problem, that humans can more than handle!

I’m starting a new series where I share a chart each day that will help calm climate anxiety. The point of sharing these is to show the average person that the science around climate change is complex and it is not an end-of-the-world scenario. These charts are ones I’ve saved over the years, that have helped me understand what the mainstream media does not cover. The more I’ve dug into the science and the models that have not come true, the more I’ve realized climate change is a totally adaptable problem, that humans can more than handle!

Lucy Biggers

54,387 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten