Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

"There is no climate emergency." That's the message from over 2,000 scientists and professionals worldwide, including Nobel laureate John Clauser, MIT's Richard Lindzen and Emeritus Professor at the University of Melbourne Ian Plimer. They all say climate science has become too political, and that the models behind global policy... show more

Electroverse

47,365 subscribers

35,127 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Former climate alarmist, Tom Harris: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between CO2 and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Credit: International Climate Science Coalition Laura Ingraham

Former climate alarmist, Tom Harris: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between CO2 and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Credit: International Climate Science Coalition Laura Ingraham

Wide Awake Media

676,242 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"This worry about CO2, the worry about methane, the worry about global warming, is all a total fabrication by shock journalists and/or dishonest politicians." Nobel prize winner John Clauser says there is no climate emergency. 🔴PREMIERE 9PM ET:

"This worry about CO2, the worry about methane, the worry about global warming, is all a total fabrication by shock journalists and/or dishonest politicians." Nobel prize winner John Clauser says there is no climate emergency. 🔴PREMIERE 9PM ET:

Jan Jekielek

40,687 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

234,348 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

There is no climate emergency; it was all about the money.💰 Just look at your electric bill. Prof. Ian Plimer “There is NO climate emergency. It’s a total con — not backed by real science.” His killer point: “Humans only produce 3% of annual CO₂ emissions. 97% is NATURAL.” “If you claim that our tiny 3% drives global warming… then PROVE the other 97% from volcanoes, oceans, and nature does NOT.”

There is no climate emergency; it was all about the money.💰 Just look at your electric bill. Prof. Ian Plimer “There is NO climate emergency. It’s a total con — not backed by real science.” His killer point: “Humans only produce 3% of annual CO₂ emissions. 97% is NATURAL.” “If you claim that our tiny 3% drives global warming… then PROVE the other 97% from volcanoes, oceans, and nature does NOT.”

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

15,995 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

"This is probably the biggest con that we've ever had." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "There is no climate emergency... It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate." "That has never been addressed."

"This is probably the biggest con that we've ever had." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "There is no climate emergency... It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate." "That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

734,912 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.Jim Lakely: "The mandate of the IPCC was not to examine climate science. Its mandate from the very beginning was to figure out how much human activity is affecting the climate. That's a very big and important distinction. So from the beginning, the United Nations and the scientists they pulled together are not interested in pursuing open inquiry about climate science. They had already established a crime, that crime being human activity and the emission of CO2 is destroying the planet, and the mandate of the IPCC was basically to indict humanity for that crime. It's not to pursue science."

.Jim Lakely: "The mandate of the IPCC was not to examine climate science. Its mandate from the very beginning was to figure out how much human activity is affecting the climate. That's a very big and important distinction. So from the beginning, the United Nations and the scientists they pulled together are not interested in pursuing open inquiry about climate science. They had already established a crime, that crime being human activity and the emission of CO2 is destroying the planet, and the mandate of the IPCC was basically to indict humanity for that crime. It's not to pursue science."

Tom Nelson

12,053 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

35,724 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Dr. Patrick Moore, one of Greenpeace's original founders, says the climate panic is built on fabrication, not science. "One of my missions," he says, "is to turn on its head the idea that carbon dioxide is a pollutant... when in fact it's the most important nutrient for all life on Earth." Dr. Moore points out that there is no clear definitive scientific proof, not one empirical formula or study, that shows CO2 causes planetary harm. "The future will show this whole hysteria over climate change was a complete fabrication," he says. CO2 is not pollution, it's the backbone of all life.

Dr. Patrick Moore, one of Greenpeace's original founders, says the climate panic is built on fabrication, not science. "One of my missions," he says, "is to turn on its head the idea that carbon dioxide is a pollutant... when in fact it's the most important nutrient for all life on Earth." Dr. Moore points out that there is no clear definitive scientific proof, not one empirical formula or study, that shows CO2 causes planetary harm. "The future will show this whole hysteria over climate change was a complete fabrication," he says. CO2 is not pollution, it's the backbone of all life.

Electroverse

12,645 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “31,000 Scientists agree that global warming is baloney.” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “I am a Scientist, and I am the FOUNDER, not Co-Founder of The Weather Channel.” ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy? “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “31,000 Scientists agree that global warming is baloney.” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “I am a Scientist, and I am the FOUNDER, not Co-Founder of The Weather Channel.” ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy? “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

HustleBitch

2,746,870 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

770,537 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

"There is no climate emergency, but the CO2 famine is very real." "For millions of years CO2 has been dropping to dangerously low levels... If CO2 levels drop below [150 ppm], plants will starve and all life on Earth will die." Credit: John Shewchuk CO2 Coalition

"There is no climate emergency, but the CO2 famine is very real." "For millions of years CO2 has been dropping to dangerously low levels... If CO2 levels drop below [150 ppm], plants will starve and all life on Earth will die." Credit: John Shewchuk CO2 Coalition

Wide Awake Media

64,825 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Retired MIT scientist LAUGHS off the claim that “the science is settled” on climate change. Once you hear this, it becomes clear that anyone insisting “the science is settled” has no idea what they’re talking about: “On the one hand, you’re told the science is settled… but on the other hand, if you read the IPCC reports, they’re pointing out, for instance, that water vapor and clouds are much bigger [greenhouse factors] than CO2, and we don’t understand them at all. So here you have the biggest phenomena we don’t understand at all, but the science is settled. Who knows what that means?” — Richard Lindzen, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Retired MIT scientist LAUGHS off the claim that “the science is settled” on climate change. Once you hear this, it becomes clear that anyone insisting “the science is settled” has no idea what they’re talking about: “On the one hand, you’re told the science is settled… but on the other hand, if you read the IPCC reports, they’re pointing out, for instance, that water vapor and clouds are much bigger [greenhouse factors] than CO2, and we don’t understand them at all. So here you have the biggest phenomena we don’t understand at all, but the science is settled. Who knows what that means?” — Richard Lindzen, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

373,718 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

We're told climate disasters are getting worse. According to the world's leading disaster database, climate-related disasters show no trend since 2000. And climate-related deaths have collapsed by over 98% since 1920, with deaths dropping from nearly 500,000 per year to under 10,000 today. Floods, droughts, storms, and wildfires are not increasing. And on top of that, humanity is just far more resilient than it used to be. There is no crisis, just progress.

We're told climate disasters are getting worse. According to the world's leading disaster database, climate-related disasters show no trend since 2000. And climate-related deaths have collapsed by over 98% since 1920, with deaths dropping from nearly 500,000 per year to under 10,000 today. Floods, droughts, storms, and wildfires are not increasing. And on top of that, humanity is just far more resilient than it used to be. There is no crisis, just progress.

Electroverse

12,747 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Former climate alarmist explains why there is no "climate crisis". "[There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. At times CO₂ was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare. It's all based on models that don't work."

Former climate alarmist explains why there is no "climate crisis". "[There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. At times CO₂ was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions." "There is no foundation to the climate scare. It's all based on models that don't work."

Wide Awake Media

51,593 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Climate deaths are down 96% since the 1920s. Despite four times more people on the planet, far fewer are dying from floods, storms, droughts or heat. That's not "climate collapse," it's resilience. Better housing, trade and technology have made humanity safer than ever. Even global disaster costs are falling, now under 0.2% of world GDP, down from 0.3% in 1990. The data show humanity is thriving by historical comparison, yet activists insist on calling this an "emergency." But the real crisis isn't the climate, it's the trillion dollar policies built on false alarms.

Climate deaths are down 96% since the 1920s. Despite four times more people on the planet, far fewer are dying from floods, storms, droughts or heat. That's not "climate collapse," it's resilience. Better housing, trade and technology have made humanity safer than ever. Even global disaster costs are falling, now under 0.2% of world GDP, down from 0.3% in 1990. The data show humanity is thriving by historical comparison, yet activists insist on calling this an "emergency." But the real crisis isn't the climate, it's the trillion dollar policies built on false alarms.

Electroverse

23,272 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Michael Shellenberger

114,406 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy?" “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

🚨 Founder of The Weather Channel SNAPS on CNN: “CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX!” ⚠️ “HellOOO everybody!! There is NO GLOBAL WARMING!” ⚠️ “The Government only gives money to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis!” ⚠️ "I resent you calling me a denier." ⚠️ “Science is not about votes, it is about facts!” ⚠️ “Climate change is not happening, and there is no man-made global warming.” ⚠️ “Is The Weather Channel part of the conspiracy?" “YES, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.”

HustleBitch

296,766 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce