Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

There is no higher authority than scripture. The Bible alone reveals God’s plan of salvation and what He expects of us. No culture, pope, church, denomination, or college professor defines truth. The Bible is our final authority of truth. It alone is the Word of God.

27,160 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Whilst you should never walk away from THE Church, sometimes you SHOULD walk away from A church. Just like before entering into a marriage covenant you must analyse the person, you should analyse a church before getting planted. You must find out where the Church stands on core doctrines. ➡️ The Trinity. If they preach oneness, if they deny the trinity, don’t go - this is heresy. ➡️ Christology. What do they believe about the divinity of Christ? If you don’t believe Jesus is God, like “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” if you believe Jesus was created, that’s not my Jesus and you’re not a true Church of Christ. ➡️ The authority of scripture. Bibliology – do they believe the Bible is the inspired word of God? ➡️ Salvation. Do they believe in salvation through faith alone? Or do they believe in sacraments saving you? ➡️ Heaven & Hell. Do they believe heaven and hell is a real place? Do they believe unless you believe in Jesus - you will be cast into hell? If not, don’t go. This is heresy. They must preach the FULL COUNSEL of God’s Word. That means, not preaching about blessing and God’s love every single week without any mention of sin or repentance. A CHURCH THAT COMPROMISES THE TRUTH IS NOT A CHURCH AT ALL. AVOID CHURCHES THAT AVOID CONTROVERISAL TOPICS OR TOPICS CONSIDERED “POLITICAL” LIKE GAY MARRIAGE OR ABORTION. IF YOU SEE A RAINBOW FLAG, RUN. IF THEY DO NOT UPHOLD THE SANCTITY OF HUMAN LIFE, RUN. As Paul Washer said “Don’t go to Church closest to you, but closest to the Bible.” Drive as far as you need to get to a Church that does not shy away from the truth of God’s word.

Millicent Sedra

28,212 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This is my facsimile copy of Codex Sinaiticus, the first few major codices like the original this is a photocopy of, are our very first versions of what we today would consider a Genesis to Revelation copy of the Bible. Codex Sinaiticus took upwards of nearly 400 sheep to make and would have cost the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in today’s currency. By the 4th century when this was made, the perspective would have been that this contained the scripture more than that it was scripture. All of these major early codices operated as mini ancient libraries. And all of our earliest examples of them: whether that’s Codex Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Vaticanus, Washingtonianus, etc., have Christian books included within the contents of their covers that we today don’t consider scripture. So it is completely incorrect to claim that early church inclusion in a codex equates to scriptural reception. That’s just not true unless you’re willing to argue books like 4th Maccabees, The Shephered of Hermas, Epistle of Barnabas, and 1st Clement and 2nd Clement, that no church today accepts as scripture, should be included within your Bible. Likewise, the church recognizing books does not mean that their ability to do so gives them the authority. To say that the church gave us our Bible is like saying that the postal service gave you your mail. Your letter carrier is not the progenitor of the mail you receive. Those were written prior to, and even despite, your mail man or woman eventually getting them in your mailbox. The church is the servant and subsidiary of scripture, not the origin. This is why I’ve said in the past that the Bible made the church, the church didn’t make the Bible. Watch the full video: See John Meade’s talk on canon lists:

WesleyHuff

58,345 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce