Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

There is no such thing as the BEST intelligence agency only different strengths shaped by geography, history, and national priorities. MOSSAD is overhyped, IMO! Every intelligence agency its own doctrine, tools, and temperament. For eg: CIA = Greater technical resources, global reach, deep surveillance capabilities, and unmatched funding ecosystem...

manamuntu's profile picture

रुद्राक्ष📿 (Rudy)

18,156 subscribers

10,225 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

‼️🇩🇪🇷🇺 BIG | Germany is preparing a major expansion of its domestic intelligence capabilities, potentially giving the country’s security services unprecedented powers to actively disrupt threats rather than simply monitor them. According to BILD, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt plans to significantly broaden the authority of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Verfassungsschutz), Germany’s domestic intelligence agency. Under the proposed reforms, the agency would no longer be limited primarily to intelligence gathering, surveillance and threat assessment. Instead, it would gain the ability to conduct active operations against extremist networks and hostile foreign actors. The expanded powers would include disrupting extremist and foreign operations, interfering with targeted data flows, deploying spyware for digital surveillance and infiltration, and even conducting offensive operations against cyber infrastructure located abroad. The reform would mark a significant shift in Germany’s security doctrine, moving the Verfassungsschutz from a largely intelligence-focused organization toward a more proactive service capable of directly disrupting hostile operations. The move comes as Germany faces an increasingly complex security environment involving Russian espionage and sabotage networks, cyberattacks and broader hybrid threats. Berlin appears determined to give its intelligence services substantially greater freedom to strike back rather than simply document hostile activity. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

‼️🇩🇪🇷🇺 BIG | Germany is preparing a major expansion of its domestic intelligence capabilities, potentially giving the country’s security services unprecedented powers to actively disrupt threats rather than simply monitor them. According to BILD, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt plans to significantly broaden the authority of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Verfassungsschutz), Germany’s domestic intelligence agency. Under the proposed reforms, the agency would no longer be limited primarily to intelligence gathering, surveillance and threat assessment. Instead, it would gain the ability to conduct active operations against extremist networks and hostile foreign actors. The expanded powers would include disrupting extremist and foreign operations, interfering with targeted data flows, deploying spyware for digital surveillance and infiltration, and even conducting offensive operations against cyber infrastructure located abroad. The reform would mark a significant shift in Germany’s security doctrine, moving the Verfassungsschutz from a largely intelligence-focused organization toward a more proactive service capable of directly disrupting hostile operations. The move comes as Germany faces an increasingly complex security environment involving Russian espionage and sabotage networks, cyberattacks and broader hybrid threats. Berlin appears determined to give its intelligence services substantially greater freedom to strike back rather than simply document hostile activity. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

15,932 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

If a prominent Indian public figure such as Major Samar Toor were targeted inside/out of India by a foreign intelligence service like Pakistan’s ISI, the consequences would likely be extremely serious at multiple levels — diplomatic, intelligence, military, legal, and political. Historically, India treats attacks on high-profile defence-linked individuals very differently from ordinary criminal incidents, especially when there is evidence of foreign-state involvement. Possible Indian responses could include: Expansive counter-intelligence operations by agencies such as the Research and Analysis Wing, Intelligence Bureau, and the National Investigation Agency. Diplomatic escalation against Inter-Services Intelligence and the Pakistani state through international forums. Increased security crackdowns on suspected espionage or proxy networks operating in India. Covert retaliation or disruption operations targeting hostile networks believed responsible. Greater security protection for defence commentators, veterans, strategic technologists, and drone-sector innovators. India’s response doctrine over the past decade has increasingly emphasized: deterrence, attribution, cross-border accountability, and asymmetric response capability. Examples often cited in public discourse include the Indian responses after: 2016 Uri attack 2019 Pulwama attack In both cases, India demonstrated willingness to respond beyond purely diplomatic measures. From a strategic perspective, individuals who: influence public opinion, contribute to defence modernization, support indigenous drone ecosystems, or strengthen military-civilian strategic awareness are often viewed as “national strategic voices.” Any credible threat against such individuals would likely trigger enhanced surveillance, protection, and intelligence monitoring.
6:00

If a prominent Indian public figure such as Major Samar Toor were targeted inside/out of India by a foreign intelligence service like Pakistan’s ISI, the consequences would likely be extremely serious at multiple levels — diplomatic, intelligence, military, legal, and political. Historically, India treats attacks on high-profile defence-linked individuals very differently from ordinary criminal incidents, especially when there is evidence of foreign-state involvement. Possible Indian responses could include: Expansive counter-intelligence operations by agencies such as the Research and Analysis Wing, Intelligence Bureau, and the National Investigation Agency. Diplomatic escalation against Inter-Services Intelligence and the Pakistani state through international forums. Increased security crackdowns on suspected espionage or proxy networks operating in India. Covert retaliation or disruption operations targeting hostile networks believed responsible. Greater security protection for defence commentators, veterans, strategic technologists, and drone-sector innovators. India’s response doctrine over the past decade has increasingly emphasized: deterrence, attribution, cross-border accountability, and asymmetric response capability. Examples often cited in public discourse include the Indian responses after: 2016 Uri attack 2019 Pulwama attack In both cases, India demonstrated willingness to respond beyond purely diplomatic measures. From a strategic perspective, individuals who: influence public opinion, contribute to defence modernization, support indigenous drone ecosystems, or strengthen military-civilian strategic awareness are often viewed as “national strategic voices.” Any credible threat against such individuals would likely trigger enhanced surveillance, protection, and intelligence monitoring.

Major Sammer Pal Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran)

68,021 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇮🇱 Mossad, This agency, founded back in 1949, isn't just another intelligence service - it is quite literally the most effective and secretive force in the world of espionage. Mossad agents operate thousands of miles from home, deep in enemy territory, pulling off missions that most people only see in movies. They’ve shaped modern history with bold operations, from capturing Adolf Eichman in Argentina to top-secret global missions targeting the biggest threats to our security. What makes them so special is that rare mix of patience, precision, and nerves of steel. These are people who look just like anyone else, blending into everyday life in any corner of the globe, but they are elite warriors working 24/7 to keep us safe. In a world of quiet wars and invisible battles, the Mossad is the eyes and ears of Israel. They are rarely seen and almost always stay in the shadows, but you can be sure of one thing - they are always watching, always ready, and always ten steps ahead of everyone else. The video is for illustration purposes only AI
1:11

🇮🇱 Mossad, This agency, founded back in 1949, isn't just another intelligence service - it is quite literally the most effective and secretive force in the world of espionage. Mossad agents operate thousands of miles from home, deep in enemy territory, pulling off missions that most people only see in movies. They’ve shaped modern history with bold operations, from capturing Adolf Eichman in Argentina to top-secret global missions targeting the biggest threats to our security. What makes them so special is that rare mix of patience, precision, and nerves of steel. These are people who look just like anyone else, blending into everyday life in any corner of the globe, but they are elite warriors working 24/7 to keep us safe. In a world of quiet wars and invisible battles, the Mossad is the eyes and ears of Israel. They are rarely seen and almost always stay in the shadows, but you can be sure of one thing - they are always watching, always ready, and always ten steps ahead of everyone else. The video is for illustration purposes only AI

סקיצה מזרחית

16,323 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 FIVE OPERATIONS THAT BUILT THE LEGEND OF MOSSAD Some intelligence agencies are simply part of a law enforcement apparatus. The Mossad? Saving lives, getting vengeance, and preventing disaster. Here are five operations that defined the reputation of Mossad: 1. OPERATION ENTEBBE Israeli commandos flew over 2,500 miles into Uganda and executed a lightning raid to rescue hostages held by terrorists. 102 hostages freed. The world watched in shock. 2. THE CAPTURE OF Adolf Eichmann Tracked down in Argentina, captured, and brought to Israel to face justice for his role in the Holocaust. A message sent: there is no hiding. 3. OPERATION DIAMOND (1966) Mossad convinced an Iraqi pilot to defect with a MiG-21, the Soviet Union’s most advanced fighter jet at the time. Game-changing intelligence overnight. 4. OPERATION WRATH OF GOD (1970s) After the Munich Olympic massacre, a global manhunt began. Those responsible were hunted down, one by one. 5. OPERATION ORCHARD (2007) A covert strike in Syria destroyed a suspected nuclear reactor before it could become a threat. Silent. Precise. Decisive. These are only 5 examples, made public, as to how effective the Mossad is. But all should know, about 99% of its work will never be exposed.
1:00

🚨 FIVE OPERATIONS THAT BUILT THE LEGEND OF MOSSAD Some intelligence agencies are simply part of a law enforcement apparatus. The Mossad? Saving lives, getting vengeance, and preventing disaster. Here are five operations that defined the reputation of Mossad: 1. OPERATION ENTEBBE Israeli commandos flew over 2,500 miles into Uganda and executed a lightning raid to rescue hostages held by terrorists. 102 hostages freed. The world watched in shock. 2. THE CAPTURE OF Adolf Eichmann Tracked down in Argentina, captured, and brought to Israel to face justice for his role in the Holocaust. A message sent: there is no hiding. 3. OPERATION DIAMOND (1966) Mossad convinced an Iraqi pilot to defect with a MiG-21, the Soviet Union’s most advanced fighter jet at the time. Game-changing intelligence overnight. 4. OPERATION WRATH OF GOD (1970s) After the Munich Olympic massacre, a global manhunt began. Those responsible were hunted down, one by one. 5. OPERATION ORCHARD (2007) A covert strike in Syria destroyed a suspected nuclear reactor before it could become a threat. Silent. Precise. Decisive. These are only 5 examples, made public, as to how effective the Mossad is. But all should know, about 99% of its work will never be exposed.

Mossad Commentary

20,406 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Somewhere… Mark Levin is crying over this.. Jesse Watters: “How concerned are you that Israel has been spying on the United States and Freelancing in Lebanon?” JD Vance: “Our interests at times diverge — Israel may like what we’re doing or not, but what we’re doing is in the best interest of the UNITED STATES.” 🔻 Important Context: The Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) recently elevated Israel’s counterintelligence threat level to “critical” — the highest tier — citing aggressive Israeli efforts to collect intelligence on senior U.S. officials and internal Trump-administration deliberations about Iran, the Middle East, and related conflicts. Specific concerns include alleged eavesdropping on Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and Pentagon policy officials (e.g., Elbridge Colby and a deputy) involved in Iran and regional talks. —— This builds on decades of history: the 1985 Jonathan Pollard spy case (one of the worst breaches in U.S. history), and 2019 reports of Israeli-linked surveillance devices near the White House, and repeated U.S. intelligence assessments that rank Israeli espionage among the most active on American soil. Both the WH and Mossad deny or downplay this, but our own DIA assessment is that it has significantly escalated. We spy on them too.. yes. Regarding “Freelancing”— it just means Israel has been conducting its own independent military and intelligence operations in Lebanon — especially airstrikes, ground incursions, and targeted actions — sometimes on its own timeline, even when the U.S. is pushing diplomatic deals, ceasefires, or de-escalation with Iran or others… against what President Trump says publicly.
2:00

Somewhere… Mark Levin is crying over this.. Jesse Watters: “How concerned are you that Israel has been spying on the United States and Freelancing in Lebanon?” JD Vance: “Our interests at times diverge — Israel may like what we’re doing or not, but what we’re doing is in the best interest of the UNITED STATES.” 🔻 Important Context: The Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) recently elevated Israel’s counterintelligence threat level to “critical” — the highest tier — citing aggressive Israeli efforts to collect intelligence on senior U.S. officials and internal Trump-administration deliberations about Iran, the Middle East, and related conflicts. Specific concerns include alleged eavesdropping on Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and Pentagon policy officials (e.g., Elbridge Colby and a deputy) involved in Iran and regional talks. —— This builds on decades of history: the 1985 Jonathan Pollard spy case (one of the worst breaches in U.S. history), and 2019 reports of Israeli-linked surveillance devices near the White House, and repeated U.S. intelligence assessments that rank Israeli espionage among the most active on American soil. Both the WH and Mossad deny or downplay this, but our own DIA assessment is that it has significantly escalated. We spy on them too.. yes. Regarding “Freelancing”— it just means Israel has been conducting its own independent military and intelligence operations in Lebanon — especially airstrikes, ground incursions, and targeted actions — sometimes on its own timeline, even when the U.S. is pushing diplomatic deals, ceasefires, or de-escalation with Iran or others… against what President Trump says publicly.

MJTruthUltra

99,728 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Who Is Attacking India’s Surveillance Satellites? This is the second time in one year that a satellite critical for India’s surveillance and national security has failed to reach its designated orbit. Despite ISRO’s strong historical success with PSLV missions, both failures occurred at the sensitive third stage, leading to the complete loss of all onboard satellites. These satellites are essential for real-time border monitoring, enemy movement tracking, and disaster response support for DRDO. When missions tied directly to surveillance fail repeatedly, questions naturally arise, especially given the strategic environment India operates in. Some experts have raised concerns about possible sabotage, including hostile external actors such as Pakistan. While ISRO is examining technical causes, intelligence agencies must also assess non-technical threats. In matters of national security, no angle can be ignored. Jai Hind.
2:55

Who Is Attacking India’s Surveillance Satellites? This is the second time in one year that a satellite critical for India’s surveillance and national security has failed to reach its designated orbit. Despite ISRO’s strong historical success with PSLV missions, both failures occurred at the sensitive third stage, leading to the complete loss of all onboard satellites. These satellites are essential for real-time border monitoring, enemy movement tracking, and disaster response support for DRDO. When missions tied directly to surveillance fail repeatedly, questions naturally arise, especially given the strategic environment India operates in. Some experts have raised concerns about possible sabotage, including hostile external actors such as Pakistan. While ISRO is examining technical causes, intelligence agencies must also assess non-technical threats. In matters of national security, no angle can be ignored. Jai Hind.

Praffulgarg

19,577 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

There is no greater US threat to its adversaries and major power competitors than Israel. It is the tip of the spear in American global security posture, wielding an opaque strategic doctrine that underwrites CENTCOM’s strategic balance. Israel has the most hardened, technologically capable military and defense industrial complex in the region. It provides an expansive network of intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities, defense tech innovation and acceleration tracks, and a strategic fallback for basing needs in CENTCOM operations. No other power stands in the way of Chinese, Russian, Iranian, and Pakistani influence spreading uncontrollably into the theater. Israel absorbs the diplomatic, reputational and security costs first and the combination of existential stakes and nonnegotiable normative alignment make it dependable under extreme coercive pressure. No other country does more to balance US multitheater load and impose costs on major power competitors eyeing the simultaneity problem for opportunistic openings. No other regional power possesses the capability set, incentives and political will to underwrite the security of critical transcontinental geoeconomic corridors vital for strategic diversification from China’s BRI and adjacent corridors and their nodes. Once understood in its proper geostrategic terms, the reason the US-Israel alliance is under intensified attack becomes manifestly clear.
1:38

There is no greater US threat to its adversaries and major power competitors than Israel. It is the tip of the spear in American global security posture, wielding an opaque strategic doctrine that underwrites CENTCOM’s strategic balance. Israel has the most hardened, technologically capable military and defense industrial complex in the region. It provides an expansive network of intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities, defense tech innovation and acceleration tracks, and a strategic fallback for basing needs in CENTCOM operations. No other power stands in the way of Chinese, Russian, Iranian, and Pakistani influence spreading uncontrollably into the theater. Israel absorbs the diplomatic, reputational and security costs first and the combination of existential stakes and nonnegotiable normative alignment make it dependable under extreme coercive pressure. No other country does more to balance US multitheater load and impose costs on major power competitors eyeing the simultaneity problem for opportunistic openings. No other regional power possesses the capability set, incentives and political will to underwrite the security of critical transcontinental geoeconomic corridors vital for strategic diversification from China’s BRI and adjacent corridors and their nodes. Once understood in its proper geostrategic terms, the reason the US-Israel alliance is under intensified attack becomes manifestly clear.

dan linnaeus

27,115 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“Totalitarian” Powers, Fear, And Psychopathy Behind CIA’s Secret Rule Over U.S. The agency remains out of control, beyond the law, and a direct threat to democracy and freedom, including in the U.S. by Michael Shellenberger Last week, we published two stories about a senior CIA whistleblower who was one of four CIA analysts who helped write a January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) that falsely claimed, with high confidence, that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The person said that the CIA Director under Obama, John Brennan, had a “pathological need for control” and put the writers of the ICA “under duress” to include a mention of a fraudulent dossier, commissioned by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The CIA also included in the classified version of the ICA an annex consisting of the dossier written by a former British spy, which went to roughly 200 people in Washington, some of whom leaked related information to journalists. Unfortunately, the CIA employee said, his employer remains corrupted by “systemic rot” and that crucial steps “have not been put in place" to prevent a Russiagate-like abuse of power from happening again, since the arrival of its new director, John Ratcliffe, in January of this year. “Two critical steps that have not been put in place are,” said the senior analyst turned whistleblower, “to first, formalize expectations about the delivery timeline for sensitive intelligence analyses, and second, to remove the CIA Director from the review process of intelligence reporting or finished analysis.” In response to questions from Public, the CIA said it was taking necessary reforms. “Director Ratcliffe has overhauled the Agency senior ranks and revoked clearances from bad actors and even created a mission center to better execute on Presidential priorities like the Southern Border. The notion that he’s not making significant reforms or holding people and the Agency accountable is not just ridiculously false but beyond absurd.” But the CIA’s revoking security clearances and creating a mission center do not address either of the whistleblower’s recommendations, much less the “systemic rot” within the CIA. The whistleblower called for the removal of the Director of the CIA from review and writing of intelligence analysis, and taking a step to avoid rush jobs, like the kind Brennan used to create a deliberately misleading ICA in January 2017. The whistleblower’s credibility is high. They were one of just four CIA analysts chosen to help write a major ICA. That might make them seem biased toward Brennan, but Ratcliffe has retained the person, rather than fired them, which suggests that the Director or the direct reports he trusts view the person as valuable. Our sense was that the person was loyal to the CIA, wants to engage in objective apolitical analyses, and wants to remain at the CIA. Their two modest proposed reforms are consistent with loyalty to the CIA. As such, the person is precisely the kind of professional the CIA, Congress, and the American people should want to have in our institutions. If a legitimate criticism is to be made of the person it would be that they didn’t turn whistleblower earlier, which is the same criticism that could be made against hundreds and perhaps thousands of people involved in the Russiagate hoax. One might hope that it was just a bad day for the PR people at the CIA, and that Ratcliffe will be out with a new statement this week announcing new reforms, but we are not hopeful. The CIA appears to be following its informal motto, “Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counteraccusations.” That was the advice that former CIA Director Porter Goss said he would give to “a graduating class of CIA case officers” in 2006. The Russiagate hoax is hardly an unusual scandal in the history of the CIA. The agency has “long gone beyond the borders of American values,” noted Tim Weiner in his 812-page history, Legacy of Ashes. The CIA has murdered its employees, overthrown democracies, propped up dictatorships, tortured innocent people, trained death squads, induced mental illness in illegal medical experiments, spied illegally on law-abiding Americans, and may have been behind the assassination of an American president. All of these illegal behaviors required cover-ups, many of them elaborate. “Fundamentally, the founding fathers of U.S. intelligence were liars,” said James Angleton, one of the CIA’s founders, and its Director of Counterintelligence for two decades, on his deathbed in 1987. “If you were in a room with them, you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” The CIA’s record is poor when evaluated on its own terms. “The CIA was established to prevent unanticipated disasters, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,” noted John Judis in 2005, “but it has repeatedly failed to warn the White House of looming threats. It missed the North Korean invasion of the South in 1950, and the Chinese entry into the war that fall; Israel, France, and Great Britain's attack on the Suez Canal and Egypt in 1956; the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968; the Shah of Iran's ouster in 1979; the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that year; the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990; the Indian nuclear tests in 1998 (‘We didn't have a clue,’ CIA director George Tenet remarked afterwards); the attack on the World Trade Center in 1993; the bombing of American military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 and of U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998; the attack on the USS Cole in 2000; and of course the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon in September 2001.” The truth, admitted a CIA station chief, “was that the agency at the height of its powers had a great reputation and a terrible record.” It never had a single Soviet spy “who had deep insight into the workings of the Kremlin,” and thus didn’t know communism was collapsing. “The one crime of lasting consequence has been the CIA’s inability to carry out its central mission: informing the president of what is happening in the world,” writes Weiner. Its record in the real world is one of “fleeting successes and long-lasting failures.” The politicization and weaponization of the CIA for ideological aims has occurred for decades. The CIA’s charter prevents it from spying on Americans and yet it has done so repeatedly, from opening mail to spying on students. Between 1947 and 1963, the CIA was “a dark and invasive force — at home and abroad — violating citizens’ privacy, kidnapping, torturing, and killing at will,” concluded David Talbot in his 686-page history of the CIA, The Devil’s Chessboard. There were many reforms proposed in the 1970s. In 1975, Congress held hearings, revealing CIA misdeeds around the world, including assassinations using a heart attack gun, and efforts at mind control. Congress then took steps to provide greater oversight of the CIA and more protections for whistleblowers. Calls for reforms began again in the 1990s after a decade of CIA scandals in the 1980s, which included selling weapons to the Iranian government and illegally diverting the money to an equally illegal war in Central America. In 1991 and 1996, the US Senator from New York, Patrick Moynihan, who had been one of America’s most influential public intellectuals for thirty years, proposed abolishing the CIA entirely and reassigning its various functions to the State Department. The proposal never came up for a vote. In 1998, America’s intelligence leaders warned the White House that America would suffer “a catastrophic, systemic failure,” unless the U.S. dramatically changed how it gathered and analyzed intelligence. That didn’t happen. Then, in 2001, the CIA failed to communicate with the FBI and thus played a central role in allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen. In 2002, the CIA manipulated intelligence that led to the catastrophic invasion of Iraq. In response to these failures, Congress in 2004 sought to reform the agency and the broader Intelligence Community. The intent of Congress in passing new legislation was to reduce the power of the CIA, and its Director, and increase the power of a new intelligence coordinator role, which it called the Director of National Intelligence. That didn’t happen. The “CIA is broken,” wrote John Judis one year later. The 2004 reform act didn’t address the “historical problems with the CIA.” “To repair it,” he concluded, “we may need to start from scratch.” That didn’t happen either. In 2016 and 2017, the CIA manipulated intelligence to falsely frame the democratically elected U.S. president as a puppet for a foreign power, and from 2016 to 2020, individuals who worked at the CIA oversaw various efforts to control what people are allowed to say on social media. Neither the Russiagate hoax scandal nor the CIA’s role in creating a Censorship Industrial Complex resulted in reform or even serious calls for it by Congress. Multiple sources tell Public that the CIA remains both the dominant agency of the 18 total in the IC, and the one most resistant to reforms. The Washington Post reported last week that the CIA resisted efforts for greater transparency led by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. And now the CIA has said we should ignore the whistleblowing by one of its most trusted senior analysts, and their demands for reform. None of this is new. In 1947, the year Congress created the CIA, the Secretary of State at the time, Dean Acheson, said he “had the gravest forebodings” about it and “warned the President that neither he” nor anyone else would be able “to control it.” Between 1947 and 2005 there were 14 major studies by various bodies into how to reform the IC. The CIA “has had an almost perfect record of resisting fundamental changes,” noted Weiner in his 2006 book. Meanwhile, Congress has failed its Constitutional duty to provide oversight. “The CIA has tried to assassinate foreign leaders, mined harbors, and most recently, tortured prisoners,” wrote Judis in 2005. “If Congress had openly debated these actions, they would not have been approved.” They didn’t and have never much demanded to be able to. Members of Congress “have been derelict in this work for much of the past three decades,” noted Weiner two years later, “but their conduct since 9/11 has bordered on criminal negligence.” Looking at the full historical record, it is hard not to conclude that the American people only partially govern themselves, that we are burdened with a rogue and violent intelligence agency that continuously interferes not only in foreign elections and governments but also our own, and that many on the Right and the Left who appear to be in a position to change that refuse to do so. Why is that? Why have Congress and the American people failed for 80 years to reform a rogue intelligence agency that is not only ineffective but also destructive to the point of undermining national security? And what, if anything, can be done about it? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech and democracy, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!
7:37

“Totalitarian” Powers, Fear, And Psychopathy Behind CIA’s Secret Rule Over U.S. The agency remains out of control, beyond the law, and a direct threat to democracy and freedom, including in the U.S. by Michael Shellenberger Last week, we published two stories about a senior CIA whistleblower who was one of four CIA analysts who helped write a January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) that falsely claimed, with high confidence, that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The person said that the CIA Director under Obama, John Brennan, had a “pathological need for control” and put the writers of the ICA “under duress” to include a mention of a fraudulent dossier, commissioned by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The CIA also included in the classified version of the ICA an annex consisting of the dossier written by a former British spy, which went to roughly 200 people in Washington, some of whom leaked related information to journalists. Unfortunately, the CIA employee said, his employer remains corrupted by “systemic rot” and that crucial steps “have not been put in place" to prevent a Russiagate-like abuse of power from happening again, since the arrival of its new director, John Ratcliffe, in January of this year. “Two critical steps that have not been put in place are,” said the senior analyst turned whistleblower, “to first, formalize expectations about the delivery timeline for sensitive intelligence analyses, and second, to remove the CIA Director from the review process of intelligence reporting or finished analysis.” In response to questions from Public, the CIA said it was taking necessary reforms. “Director Ratcliffe has overhauled the Agency senior ranks and revoked clearances from bad actors and even created a mission center to better execute on Presidential priorities like the Southern Border. The notion that he’s not making significant reforms or holding people and the Agency accountable is not just ridiculously false but beyond absurd.” But the CIA’s revoking security clearances and creating a mission center do not address either of the whistleblower’s recommendations, much less the “systemic rot” within the CIA. The whistleblower called for the removal of the Director of the CIA from review and writing of intelligence analysis, and taking a step to avoid rush jobs, like the kind Brennan used to create a deliberately misleading ICA in January 2017. The whistleblower’s credibility is high. They were one of just four CIA analysts chosen to help write a major ICA. That might make them seem biased toward Brennan, but Ratcliffe has retained the person, rather than fired them, which suggests that the Director or the direct reports he trusts view the person as valuable. Our sense was that the person was loyal to the CIA, wants to engage in objective apolitical analyses, and wants to remain at the CIA. Their two modest proposed reforms are consistent with loyalty to the CIA. As such, the person is precisely the kind of professional the CIA, Congress, and the American people should want to have in our institutions. If a legitimate criticism is to be made of the person it would be that they didn’t turn whistleblower earlier, which is the same criticism that could be made against hundreds and perhaps thousands of people involved in the Russiagate hoax. One might hope that it was just a bad day for the PR people at the CIA, and that Ratcliffe will be out with a new statement this week announcing new reforms, but we are not hopeful. The CIA appears to be following its informal motto, “Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counteraccusations.” That was the advice that former CIA Director Porter Goss said he would give to “a graduating class of CIA case officers” in 2006. The Russiagate hoax is hardly an unusual scandal in the history of the CIA. The agency has “long gone beyond the borders of American values,” noted Tim Weiner in his 812-page history, Legacy of Ashes. The CIA has murdered its employees, overthrown democracies, propped up dictatorships, tortured innocent people, trained death squads, induced mental illness in illegal medical experiments, spied illegally on law-abiding Americans, and may have been behind the assassination of an American president. All of these illegal behaviors required cover-ups, many of them elaborate. “Fundamentally, the founding fathers of U.S. intelligence were liars,” said James Angleton, one of the CIA’s founders, and its Director of Counterintelligence for two decades, on his deathbed in 1987. “If you were in a room with them, you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” The CIA’s record is poor when evaluated on its own terms. “The CIA was established to prevent unanticipated disasters, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,” noted John Judis in 2005, “but it has repeatedly failed to warn the White House of looming threats. It missed the North Korean invasion of the South in 1950, and the Chinese entry into the war that fall; Israel, France, and Great Britain's attack on the Suez Canal and Egypt in 1956; the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968; the Shah of Iran's ouster in 1979; the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that year; the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990; the Indian nuclear tests in 1998 (‘We didn't have a clue,’ CIA director George Tenet remarked afterwards); the attack on the World Trade Center in 1993; the bombing of American military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 and of U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998; the attack on the USS Cole in 2000; and of course the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon in September 2001.” The truth, admitted a CIA station chief, “was that the agency at the height of its powers had a great reputation and a terrible record.” It never had a single Soviet spy “who had deep insight into the workings of the Kremlin,” and thus didn’t know communism was collapsing. “The one crime of lasting consequence has been the CIA’s inability to carry out its central mission: informing the president of what is happening in the world,” writes Weiner. Its record in the real world is one of “fleeting successes and long-lasting failures.” The politicization and weaponization of the CIA for ideological aims has occurred for decades. The CIA’s charter prevents it from spying on Americans and yet it has done so repeatedly, from opening mail to spying on students. Between 1947 and 1963, the CIA was “a dark and invasive force — at home and abroad — violating citizens’ privacy, kidnapping, torturing, and killing at will,” concluded David Talbot in his 686-page history of the CIA, The Devil’s Chessboard. There were many reforms proposed in the 1970s. In 1975, Congress held hearings, revealing CIA misdeeds around the world, including assassinations using a heart attack gun, and efforts at mind control. Congress then took steps to provide greater oversight of the CIA and more protections for whistleblowers. Calls for reforms began again in the 1990s after a decade of CIA scandals in the 1980s, which included selling weapons to the Iranian government and illegally diverting the money to an equally illegal war in Central America. In 1991 and 1996, the US Senator from New York, Patrick Moynihan, who had been one of America’s most influential public intellectuals for thirty years, proposed abolishing the CIA entirely and reassigning its various functions to the State Department. The proposal never came up for a vote. In 1998, America’s intelligence leaders warned the White House that America would suffer “a catastrophic, systemic failure,” unless the U.S. dramatically changed how it gathered and analyzed intelligence. That didn’t happen. Then, in 2001, the CIA failed to communicate with the FBI and thus played a central role in allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen. In 2002, the CIA manipulated intelligence that led to the catastrophic invasion of Iraq. In response to these failures, Congress in 2004 sought to reform the agency and the broader Intelligence Community. The intent of Congress in passing new legislation was to reduce the power of the CIA, and its Director, and increase the power of a new intelligence coordinator role, which it called the Director of National Intelligence. That didn’t happen. The “CIA is broken,” wrote John Judis one year later. The 2004 reform act didn’t address the “historical problems with the CIA.” “To repair it,” he concluded, “we may need to start from scratch.” That didn’t happen either. In 2016 and 2017, the CIA manipulated intelligence to falsely frame the democratically elected U.S. president as a puppet for a foreign power, and from 2016 to 2020, individuals who worked at the CIA oversaw various efforts to control what people are allowed to say on social media. Neither the Russiagate hoax scandal nor the CIA’s role in creating a Censorship Industrial Complex resulted in reform or even serious calls for it by Congress. Multiple sources tell Public that the CIA remains both the dominant agency of the 18 total in the IC, and the one most resistant to reforms. The Washington Post reported last week that the CIA resisted efforts for greater transparency led by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. And now the CIA has said we should ignore the whistleblowing by one of its most trusted senior analysts, and their demands for reform. None of this is new. In 1947, the year Congress created the CIA, the Secretary of State at the time, Dean Acheson, said he “had the gravest forebodings” about it and “warned the President that neither he” nor anyone else would be able “to control it.” Between 1947 and 2005 there were 14 major studies by various bodies into how to reform the IC. The CIA “has had an almost perfect record of resisting fundamental changes,” noted Weiner in his 2006 book. Meanwhile, Congress has failed its Constitutional duty to provide oversight. “The CIA has tried to assassinate foreign leaders, mined harbors, and most recently, tortured prisoners,” wrote Judis in 2005. “If Congress had openly debated these actions, they would not have been approved.” They didn’t and have never much demanded to be able to. Members of Congress “have been derelict in this work for much of the past three decades,” noted Weiner two years later, “but their conduct since 9/11 has bordered on criminal negligence.” Looking at the full historical record, it is hard not to conclude that the American people only partially govern themselves, that we are burdened with a rogue and violent intelligence agency that continuously interferes not only in foreign elections and governments but also our own, and that many on the Right and the Left who appear to be in a position to change that refuse to do so. Why is that? Why have Congress and the American people failed for 80 years to reform a rogue intelligence agency that is not only ineffective but also destructive to the point of undermining national security? And what, if anything, can be done about it? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech and democracy, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!

Michael Shellenberger

48,655 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: EX-CIA OFFICER ON MOSSAD, MADURO, PUTIN & IRAN This guy worked undercover across the Middle East, Europe, and Asia, recruited foreign agents, ran spy ops, helped stop a Russian cyberattack on Tesla, and helped set up Tesla's insider threat & info security team. He also learned Persian and knows Iran like the back of his hand. So we go deep on Iran, and his take is blunt: the regime is weaker than it looks, its proxies are gone, and if it falls, it may not collapse like Syria or Libya, because Iran was the one destabilizing everyone else. He also breaks down how Mossad’s most infamous operations worked, from assassinations in five‑star hotels to the Hezbollah pager attack. On Maduro, he explains how leaders are captured through patterns‑of‑life data, satellites, drones, and HUMINT, and why pressure from Trump‑era policies actually makes insiders more likely to flip, not less. We also discuss Putin’s grip on power, and how Russian Intelligence was able to assassinate so many opponents of the Kremlin. He also says privacy is basically dead by default; as phones, apps, metadata, even fitness trackers can get you tracked or killed… but insists people can still protect themselves if they’re willing to sacrifice convenience. Bottom line: the world runs on hard power, intelligence ops, and leverage, and most of it happens far below the headlines. If you want to know what’s going on behind the headlines, listen to this interview with Charles Finfrock - Charles Finfrock’s military background and how he got into the CIA and security. - Tesla’s Russian Security Threat - Finfrock’s role in the CIA overseas - Mossad Operations and other Foreign Intelligence Agencies - Hamas logistics Maqbool Operation - The Hezbollah Operation - The Iran Protests and Current Situation - Privacy, Security, and How the U.S. Captured Maduro with Intelligence - How Capturing Maduro infected Iran with Paranoia - Do we even have privacy anymore? Our apps expose our patterns and sell our data - Doesn't matter what you do, if you’re important enough, you're going to be found - Putin’s grip on power, and Russian Intelligence Assassinations - Hard Power and its prevalence in the Middle East - The Future of Iran: Is there a red line?
1:06:40

🚨🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: EX-CIA OFFICER ON MOSSAD, MADURO, PUTIN & IRAN This guy worked undercover across the Middle East, Europe, and Asia, recruited foreign agents, ran spy ops, helped stop a Russian cyberattack on Tesla, and helped set up Tesla's insider threat & info security team. He also learned Persian and knows Iran like the back of his hand. So we go deep on Iran, and his take is blunt: the regime is weaker than it looks, its proxies are gone, and if it falls, it may not collapse like Syria or Libya, because Iran was the one destabilizing everyone else. He also breaks down how Mossad’s most infamous operations worked, from assassinations in five‑star hotels to the Hezbollah pager attack. On Maduro, he explains how leaders are captured through patterns‑of‑life data, satellites, drones, and HUMINT, and why pressure from Trump‑era policies actually makes insiders more likely to flip, not less. We also discuss Putin’s grip on power, and how Russian Intelligence was able to assassinate so many opponents of the Kremlin. He also says privacy is basically dead by default; as phones, apps, metadata, even fitness trackers can get you tracked or killed… but insists people can still protect themselves if they’re willing to sacrifice convenience. Bottom line: the world runs on hard power, intelligence ops, and leverage, and most of it happens far below the headlines. If you want to know what’s going on behind the headlines, listen to this interview with Charles Finfrock - Charles Finfrock’s military background and how he got into the CIA and security. - Tesla’s Russian Security Threat - Finfrock’s role in the CIA overseas - Mossad Operations and other Foreign Intelligence Agencies - Hamas logistics Maqbool Operation - The Hezbollah Operation - The Iran Protests and Current Situation - Privacy, Security, and How the U.S. Captured Maduro with Intelligence - How Capturing Maduro infected Iran with Paranoia - Do we even have privacy anymore? Our apps expose our patterns and sell our data - Doesn't matter what you do, if you’re important enough, you're going to be found - Putin’s grip on power, and Russian Intelligence Assassinations - Hard Power and its prevalence in the Middle East - The Future of Iran: Is there a red line?

Mario Nawfal

1,348,205 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

A GLOBAL Reckoning..... The public will learn this goes WAY beyond Epstein.... 🟨 Q 4565: "Possible Epstein was a puppet [not the main person(s) of interest]? Financed by who or what [F] entities?" 👉 [F] = FOREIGN "We have been faced with a reckoning opportunity; that the elite in this WORLD, not Country, in this WORLD, are frankly, perverted and have been used to, for quote some time, a power structure and opportunity for perversion, unfettered..." Epstein was never the main player — but a small node inside something MUCH larger. We were told, and common sense dictates this based on patterns and historical intelligence tradecraft. History shows that blackmail, sexual compromise, and addiction have been used by intelligence agencies around the world as tools of leverage and control. That’s not "conspiracy theory" it is documented practice. Epstein wasn’t the architect — he was a facilitator - A mechanism for gathering leverage on politicians, royalty, financiers, Hollywood, and global influencers. BUT, the real power wasn’t the face we saw — but the entities operating behind the scenes. 🟨 Q 4565: "Sometimes it's the people in the background that are of greater significance." Agencies such as the CIA, Mossad and Five Eyes–linked structures benefitted from influence networks like this. The "names no one knows" - the uber elites of the world - the puppet masters - benefitted from influence networks like this. The renewed focus on Epstein isn’t random. Trump, the Military, the “white hats” are intentionally amplifying this topic to educate the public about how sex trafficking, blackmail, and influence networks operate at elite levels. Not as a partisan issue — but as a systems issue. This is just the start. The broader idea: Once the public understands how leverage works, they will start questioning whether similar networks operate internationally — across governments, finance, media, and intelligence communities. They will see how it is all connected. They will be shown, this goes far beyond Epstein - far beyond borders - ABOVE the level of Government. History shows: Power protects itself. Influence often operates quietly. The people in the background are sometimes more important than the visible face. Epstein may have been the scandal. But the structure behind him IS be the REAL story. Coming soon, to a theater near you....
1:26

A GLOBAL Reckoning..... The public will learn this goes WAY beyond Epstein.... 🟨 Q 4565: "Possible Epstein was a puppet [not the main person(s) of interest]? Financed by who or what [F] entities?" 👉 [F] = FOREIGN "We have been faced with a reckoning opportunity; that the elite in this WORLD, not Country, in this WORLD, are frankly, perverted and have been used to, for quote some time, a power structure and opportunity for perversion, unfettered..." Epstein was never the main player — but a small node inside something MUCH larger. We were told, and common sense dictates this based on patterns and historical intelligence tradecraft. History shows that blackmail, sexual compromise, and addiction have been used by intelligence agencies around the world as tools of leverage and control. That’s not "conspiracy theory" it is documented practice. Epstein wasn’t the architect — he was a facilitator - A mechanism for gathering leverage on politicians, royalty, financiers, Hollywood, and global influencers. BUT, the real power wasn’t the face we saw — but the entities operating behind the scenes. 🟨 Q 4565: "Sometimes it's the people in the background that are of greater significance." Agencies such as the CIA, Mossad and Five Eyes–linked structures benefitted from influence networks like this. The "names no one knows" - the uber elites of the world - the puppet masters - benefitted from influence networks like this. The renewed focus on Epstein isn’t random. Trump, the Military, the “white hats” are intentionally amplifying this topic to educate the public about how sex trafficking, blackmail, and influence networks operate at elite levels. Not as a partisan issue — but as a systems issue. This is just the start. The broader idea: Once the public understands how leverage works, they will start questioning whether similar networks operate internationally — across governments, finance, media, and intelligence communities. They will see how it is all connected. They will be shown, this goes far beyond Epstein - far beyond borders - ABOVE the level of Government. History shows: Power protects itself. Influence often operates quietly. The people in the background are sometimes more important than the visible face. Epstein may have been the scandal. But the structure behind him IS be the REAL story. Coming soon, to a theater near you....

NewsTreason Channel 17

19,657 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

⚡️🚨 BREAKING: Yemeni Ministry of Interior reveals details of a major security operation busting a joint US-SAUDI-ISRAELI spy ring: Thanks to God's blessings, guidance, support, and backing, the Ministry of Interior announces the operation (And their plot is in vain), a qualitative security operation that took place in several stages. With God's help and guidance, it led to the arrest of a spy network affiliated with a joint operations room between the American CIA, Israeli Mossad, and Saudi intelligence, based on Saudi territory. This significant security achievement was accomplished - thanks to God Almighty - after search, surveillance, and follow-up operations that uncovered the enemy's plots and methods of traitorous elements working for them. After thorough investigations and analysis, much information was revealed. We disclose the following: First: The joint room coordinated sabotage and espionage efforts against Yemen from Saudi territory. It formed small cells that worked separately but were all connected to the joint room. Second: The joint intelligence room provided spy cells with advanced devices and espionage tools to carry out spying and surveillance on any location they wanted. They trained cell members on using these devices and writing reports. Third: Spy cells monitored Yemen's infrastructure and attempted to uncover its military and security structure. They gathered information on civilian leaders and military commanders. Fourth: Cells within the network contributed to shedding Yemeni civilians' blood in several operations carried out by American and Israeli enemies against homes, markets, and public places. The formation of this joint intelligence room between American, Israeli, and Saudi enemies came amid escalation against Yemen. This aimed to stop military operations supporting our brothers in Gaza. To enhance trust between citizens and security agencies, we reveal part of this network's information. We express gratitude for our free citizens' vigilance. We call upon every free Yemeni to be vigilant about enemy movements targeting our internal front. We assure our leader that we will remain vigilant. Mercy and eternity for martyrs Recovery for wounded Freedom for prisoners Victory for Yemen Issued by Ministry of Interior 17 Jumada I 1447 AH 09 November 2025 CE
7:37

⚡️🚨 BREAKING: Yemeni Ministry of Interior reveals details of a major security operation busting a joint US-SAUDI-ISRAELI spy ring: Thanks to God's blessings, guidance, support, and backing, the Ministry of Interior announces the operation (And their plot is in vain), a qualitative security operation that took place in several stages. With God's help and guidance, it led to the arrest of a spy network affiliated with a joint operations room between the American CIA, Israeli Mossad, and Saudi intelligence, based on Saudi territory. This significant security achievement was accomplished - thanks to God Almighty - after search, surveillance, and follow-up operations that uncovered the enemy's plots and methods of traitorous elements working for them. After thorough investigations and analysis, much information was revealed. We disclose the following: First: The joint room coordinated sabotage and espionage efforts against Yemen from Saudi territory. It formed small cells that worked separately but were all connected to the joint room. Second: The joint intelligence room provided spy cells with advanced devices and espionage tools to carry out spying and surveillance on any location they wanted. They trained cell members on using these devices and writing reports. Third: Spy cells monitored Yemen's infrastructure and attempted to uncover its military and security structure. They gathered information on civilian leaders and military commanders. Fourth: Cells within the network contributed to shedding Yemeni civilians' blood in several operations carried out by American and Israeli enemies against homes, markets, and public places. The formation of this joint intelligence room between American, Israeli, and Saudi enemies came amid escalation against Yemen. This aimed to stop military operations supporting our brothers in Gaza. To enhance trust between citizens and security agencies, we reveal part of this network's information. We express gratitude for our free citizens' vigilance. We call upon every free Yemeni to be vigilant about enemy movements targeting our internal front. We assure our leader that we will remain vigilant. Mercy and eternity for martyrs Recovery for wounded Freedom for prisoners Victory for Yemen Issued by Ministry of Interior 17 Jumada I 1447 AH 09 November 2025 CE

Middle East Observer

47,274 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Indian Army Intensifies Winter Operations in Kishtwar and Doda to Flush Out Pakistani Terrorists As the bone-chilling winter descends upon the Himalayas and the 40-day period of Chillai Kalan grips Jammu & Kashmir, sources in the defence establishment have said that the Indian Army has intensified its counter-terrorism operations across the Kishtwar and Doda districts. Undeterred by freezing temperatures, treacherous terrain, and heavy snowfall, Army units have expanded their operational reach into higher and snowbound areas to pursue and neutralise Pakistani terrorists attempting to exploit the harsh season for concealment. Traditionally, the onset of Chillai Kalan; the harshest phase of Kashmir’s winter spanning from December 21 to January 31 ushers in a temporary lull in terrorist activities, as communication routes close and heavy snowfall isolates mountain regions. However, this winter has marked a decisive shift in the operational approach of the Indian Army and other security forces. Instead of reducing activities, sources have said that the Army has adopted a proactive winter posture, establishing temporary bases and surveillance posts deep within snow-covered areas to maintain unbroken pressure on possible terrorist hideouts. Operating in sub-zero temperatures with limited visibility, Army patrols have been regularly traversing high-altitude ridgelines, valleys, and forested areas to deny terrorists any sanctuary. The shift according to experts signifies an evolution in counter-terrorism tactics, underlining both the Army’s adaptability and its resolve to maintain operational momentum irrespective of the season or terrain. A defining feature of this year’s counter-terror strategy has been the integrated approach to operations. The Indian Army is leading a synchronised effort involving multiple security and law enforcement agencies, including the Civil Administration, Jammu and Kashmir Police (JKP), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Special Operations Group (SOG), Forest Guards, and Village Defence Guards (VDGs). This inter-agency cooperation ensures seamless sharing of intelligence, resource optimisation & sharper operational execution. Intelligence from multiple agencies is carefully synthesised to draw precise situational pictures of terrorist movement and hideout patterns. Once intelligence is verified, coordinated joint operations are planned & launched, minimising overlaps and ensuring maximum impact with tactical precision. The synergy among ground units and intelligence frameworks has enhanced response time, enabling security forces to act swiftly the moment actionable information surfaces. As per assessment made by various intelligence agencies, there are approximately 30 to 35 Pakistani terrorists currently in the Jammu region. Inputs gathered over the past few months suggests that these Pakistani terrorist groups, finding themselves cornered by successful counter-terror operations, have shifted deeper into higher and middle mountain reaches of the region; areas now devoid of habitation. These terrorists are believed to be seeking temporary winter hideouts to evade detection and avoid direct confrontation with security troops. Reports indicate that these remnants of terror groups are attempting to coerce or threaten local villagers for shelter and food supplies, though their support among locals and overground workers has sharply declined. The drying local support and continuous security vigilance at lower altitudes have forced them into isolation, further restricting their ability to regroup or plan coordinated attacks. The principal focus for the Army and other forces this winter is twofold: to eliminate remaining terrorist pockets within known areas and to ensure that terrorists remain confined to inhospitable higher reaches. This containment strategy not only prevents terrorists from infiltrating or regrouping in populated belts but also significantly disrupts their logistics & communication.
0:24

Indian Army Intensifies Winter Operations in Kishtwar and Doda to Flush Out Pakistani Terrorists As the bone-chilling winter descends upon the Himalayas and the 40-day period of Chillai Kalan grips Jammu & Kashmir, sources in the defence establishment have said that the Indian Army has intensified its counter-terrorism operations across the Kishtwar and Doda districts. Undeterred by freezing temperatures, treacherous terrain, and heavy snowfall, Army units have expanded their operational reach into higher and snowbound areas to pursue and neutralise Pakistani terrorists attempting to exploit the harsh season for concealment. Traditionally, the onset of Chillai Kalan; the harshest phase of Kashmir’s winter spanning from December 21 to January 31 ushers in a temporary lull in terrorist activities, as communication routes close and heavy snowfall isolates mountain regions. However, this winter has marked a decisive shift in the operational approach of the Indian Army and other security forces. Instead of reducing activities, sources have said that the Army has adopted a proactive winter posture, establishing temporary bases and surveillance posts deep within snow-covered areas to maintain unbroken pressure on possible terrorist hideouts. Operating in sub-zero temperatures with limited visibility, Army patrols have been regularly traversing high-altitude ridgelines, valleys, and forested areas to deny terrorists any sanctuary. The shift according to experts signifies an evolution in counter-terrorism tactics, underlining both the Army’s adaptability and its resolve to maintain operational momentum irrespective of the season or terrain. A defining feature of this year’s counter-terror strategy has been the integrated approach to operations. The Indian Army is leading a synchronised effort involving multiple security and law enforcement agencies, including the Civil Administration, Jammu and Kashmir Police (JKP), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Special Operations Group (SOG), Forest Guards, and Village Defence Guards (VDGs). This inter-agency cooperation ensures seamless sharing of intelligence, resource optimisation & sharper operational execution. Intelligence from multiple agencies is carefully synthesised to draw precise situational pictures of terrorist movement and hideout patterns. Once intelligence is verified, coordinated joint operations are planned & launched, minimising overlaps and ensuring maximum impact with tactical precision. The synergy among ground units and intelligence frameworks has enhanced response time, enabling security forces to act swiftly the moment actionable information surfaces. As per assessment made by various intelligence agencies, there are approximately 30 to 35 Pakistani terrorists currently in the Jammu region. Inputs gathered over the past few months suggests that these Pakistani terrorist groups, finding themselves cornered by successful counter-terror operations, have shifted deeper into higher and middle mountain reaches of the region; areas now devoid of habitation. These terrorists are believed to be seeking temporary winter hideouts to evade detection and avoid direct confrontation with security troops. Reports indicate that these remnants of terror groups are attempting to coerce or threaten local villagers for shelter and food supplies, though their support among locals and overground workers has sharply declined. The drying local support and continuous security vigilance at lower altitudes have forced them into isolation, further restricting their ability to regroup or plan coordinated attacks. The principal focus for the Army and other forces this winter is twofold: to eliminate remaining terrorist pockets within known areas and to ensure that terrorists remain confined to inhospitable higher reaches. This containment strategy not only prevents terrorists from infiltrating or regrouping in populated belts but also significantly disrupts their logistics & communication.

Aditya Raj Kaul

56,288 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Your absolute loyalty to the regime will never save you when the next sudden purge knocks on your door. This terrifying reality is exactly what Taiwan is weaponizing with a high-stakes intelligence operation launched on June 14, 2026. Taiwan's National Security Bureau has officially opened a secure, dedicated reporting portal called the Chinese Nationals Contact Window at This unprecedented channel directly invites citizens and disillusioned officials inside mainland China or overseas to securely leak political, military, economic, and social intelligence to Taipei. The psychological warfare behind this launch features an AI-generated promotional video that captures the quiet desperation of life under Beijing's tightening grip, following a civil servant who watches old comrades inexplicably vanish before deciding to turn on the regime. Taiwan explicitly acknowledges that this bold move mirrors highly successful public outreach campaigns pioneered by Western intelligence. The CIA previously launched a direct parallel campaign, releasing targeted Chinese-language videos and step-by-step instructional guides to help dissatisfied Chinese citizens safely navigate secure communication channels. Just like Taiwan's new portal, those American efforts directly exploited internal grievances such as severe economic misery, suffocating political controls, and the constant fear of sudden investigations. Both initiatives represent a modern shift in global intelligence tradecraft, where democratic societies openly invite digital walk-ins from individuals trapped inside authoritarian systems. While the CIA runs a massive, resource-heavy global recruitment operation, Taiwan has tailored a pragmatic, localized version built for its immediate threat environment. While Beijing relies on coercive covert tactics, fake job postings, and state-mandated informant hotlines to enforce compliance, these Western and Taiwanese digital channels give a safe outlet to internal dissent. Although the new portal is blocked by China's great firewall, it remains entirely accessible via VPNs for anyone brave enough to break through. The cross-strait intelligence war has entered a deeply volatile new chapter, and the world is watching to see how many desperate insiders will risk everything to flip the script on their oppressors. #Taiwan #China #Espionage #NationalSecurity #NSB #CIA #Geopolitics #CrossStrait
1:03

Your absolute loyalty to the regime will never save you when the next sudden purge knocks on your door. This terrifying reality is exactly what Taiwan is weaponizing with a high-stakes intelligence operation launched on June 14, 2026. Taiwan's National Security Bureau has officially opened a secure, dedicated reporting portal called the Chinese Nationals Contact Window at This unprecedented channel directly invites citizens and disillusioned officials inside mainland China or overseas to securely leak political, military, economic, and social intelligence to Taipei. The psychological warfare behind this launch features an AI-generated promotional video that captures the quiet desperation of life under Beijing's tightening grip, following a civil servant who watches old comrades inexplicably vanish before deciding to turn on the regime. Taiwan explicitly acknowledges that this bold move mirrors highly successful public outreach campaigns pioneered by Western intelligence. The CIA previously launched a direct parallel campaign, releasing targeted Chinese-language videos and step-by-step instructional guides to help dissatisfied Chinese citizens safely navigate secure communication channels. Just like Taiwan's new portal, those American efforts directly exploited internal grievances such as severe economic misery, suffocating political controls, and the constant fear of sudden investigations. Both initiatives represent a modern shift in global intelligence tradecraft, where democratic societies openly invite digital walk-ins from individuals trapped inside authoritarian systems. While the CIA runs a massive, resource-heavy global recruitment operation, Taiwan has tailored a pragmatic, localized version built for its immediate threat environment. While Beijing relies on coercive covert tactics, fake job postings, and state-mandated informant hotlines to enforce compliance, these Western and Taiwanese digital channels give a safe outlet to internal dissent. Although the new portal is blocked by China's great firewall, it remains entirely accessible via VPNs for anyone brave enough to break through. The cross-strait intelligence war has entered a deeply volatile new chapter, and the world is watching to see how many desperate insiders will risk everything to flip the script on their oppressors. #Taiwan #China #Espionage #NationalSecurity #NSB #CIA #Geopolitics #CrossStrait

UnveiledChina

23,795 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Here it is: THE whistleblower right here on American soil: Gary Berntsen, a 24‑year veteran of the U.S. Air Force who served as a Senior Operations Officer and Chief of Station for the Central Intelligence Agency. The Central Intelligence Agency via Dominion rigging systems and Smartmatic, toppled the U.S. government on November 3, 2020, from abroad. Smartmatic set up its office inside Venezuela’s election commission, with engineers working side by side to steal elections and defeat audits. Gary Berntsen explains how ballot images are swapped, source code is hidden, and fourteen methods of fraud are mixed so that no pattern is ever found. The same engineers later moved into U.S. counties and flipped long‑red districts overnight. “Dominion Voting Systems manages elections in almost all the swing states in the U.S., which determine who wins the presidency. We have evidence and witnesses that can prove the source code operating the election machines of both Smartmatic and Dominion, and other election companies, is owned by the Venezuelan narco regime. We also have evidence and witnesses proving the machines are manufactured in the People’s Republic of China.” “I was in the CIA for 24 years. The agency has been defeated. We’ve been penetrated so badly that our enemies now influence U.S. foreign policy. It’s time to shut the CIA down and build an OSS‑style service with a dedicated MI5‑type counterintelligence arm.” Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump The White House Lara Logan FBI Director Kash Patel
10:12

Here it is: THE whistleblower right here on American soil: Gary Berntsen, a 24‑year veteran of the U.S. Air Force who served as a Senior Operations Officer and Chief of Station for the Central Intelligence Agency. The Central Intelligence Agency via Dominion rigging systems and Smartmatic, toppled the U.S. government on November 3, 2020, from abroad. Smartmatic set up its office inside Venezuela’s election commission, with engineers working side by side to steal elections and defeat audits. Gary Berntsen explains how ballot images are swapped, source code is hidden, and fourteen methods of fraud are mixed so that no pattern is ever found. The same engineers later moved into U.S. counties and flipped long‑red districts overnight. “Dominion Voting Systems manages elections in almost all the swing states in the U.S., which determine who wins the presidency. We have evidence and witnesses that can prove the source code operating the election machines of both Smartmatic and Dominion, and other election companies, is owned by the Venezuelan narco regime. We also have evidence and witnesses proving the machines are manufactured in the People’s Republic of China.” “I was in the CIA for 24 years. The agency has been defeated. We’ve been penetrated so badly that our enemies now influence U.S. foreign policy. It’s time to shut the CIA down and build an OSS‑style service with a dedicated MI5‑type counterintelligence arm.” Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump The White House Lara Logan FBI Director Kash Patel

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

151,141 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce