"...there is proof that the state is hiding from you." The prosecutor screamed, "INSTRUCT HIM TO BE QUIET!" Here is the moment that has now caused another break in the trial. #zacharyhughes

What happened off camera after lunch was the state gave a jury instruction for the judge to read about disregarding what the defendant said. #ZacharyHughes told the judge he would try and follow his order, but that he also swore on the Bible to tell the truth.

Testimony about the actual murder is coming any minute. WATCH:

He brought a box of roses and said they were for her sister, she said her sister wasn't home so he knew she was alone.  There's the FLOWERS! #zacharyhughes #rosepetalmurder

Court is on an extended break. TO RECAP: - Zachary Hughes testified to murdering Christina Parcell, arriving with a box of roses. - He said John Mello offered him money to kill Christina and claims he turned it down. - He said John Mello told him where everyone in the house would be the day of the murder. - He told the jury he felt relieved after the murder because Christina's daughter would no longer be sexually abused. - He then blurted out that the State is hiding that fact from the jury. - John Mello was arrested today based on Hughes testimony. (I think that sums it up) #zacharyhughes

After the break, the judge held Zachary Hughes in contempt and sentenced him to 6 months.

Read our next article in this ongoing investigation that shows how the government's seizure of this private property and arrest of its owner further exposes the eco-tyranny happening in California...

Let him talk. What is the prosecution so afraid of? Let the jury decide. It's up to them in the end whether or not to believe him.

This case is a train wreck! Wondering what judge will do with that!

I mean yah what did the state think he was gunna do??? I would do the same thing he is doing rn

Smug, horrible, calculated, premeditated bastard.

And now another arrest. This is wild. These cases just always make me think of what these victims’ families have been through

According to Grok: Defendant’s Testimony Was Intentional Misconduct What Happens: If the defense deliberately caused the issue (e.g., blurting out banned evidence), the judge might grant the mistrial and attribute it to the defendant. Recourse for State: Retrial is almost certainly allowed, as double jeopardy doesn’t protect a defendant who “goads” the mistrial (United States v. Dinitz, 1976). Defendant’s Recourse: Limited—they’d have to argue the testimony was accidental or justified, but courts rarely buy that if it’s calculated.

Well I can't unhear that!!🤔

Why are they not muting her name? It's on 1/2 hour delay ffs