THERE IT IS 🚨 US Attorney John Sarcone III accidentally admits that Flock cameras are really for mass surveillance of people walking around in public “If you don't have flock cameras, how are law enforcement gonna detect and see somebody walking around possibly looking to blow up your, your... state capitol or commit terrorist acts?” Walking around is very different than license plate readers…. Slowly they let slip the real agenda It’s mass surveillance similar to China This is John Sarcone III a US Attorney in Nee York City, they are telling us what’s really the plan for Flock camerasshow more

😅 omg someone fire these demons what is with their eyes no wonder he wears goggles no wonder they hire retards to push this shit something seriously wrong with these freaks

oopsie - there is this little thing called Constitution that doesn't care about YOUR opinions John S.! This is Sovereign!

"The State" is not your friend. If you didn't learn anything else from COVID at least remember what they are willing to do in the name of "safety".

Repeal the Patriot Act NOW! We’ve been covertly ‘mass surveilled” since its inception. Warrantless phone surveillance, every keystroke of our computers/phones, every post & at every toll crossing. Flock is just the overt face of a ruling elite that intends to hold power in perpetuity. Covid’s literal totalitarian over reach should inform every American that Flock, just like every element of the Patriot Act, will be abused at the expense of our constitutional rights under the guise of public safety. The Biden/Obama administration opened the border for four years allowing over 12 million foreign nationals to enter. Vaccination status unknown. According to DHS Secretary Mayorkas 70% were single adult males. Now the American people must endure mass surveillance because someone might have a bomb??? How about we ‘mass surveil’ communities whose demographics reflect the new unvetted arrivals? We aren’t ‘governed by consent’. We are ‘ruled by elites’. None of this is for the benefit of the American people! None of it!!!

Blow up the State Capitol, lol. Like anyone that deep into a plan wouldn't target the Federal Reserve, the IRS, or any of the actual oppressors of the American People.

@Athena3221 They will say it’s for our safety but have no problem trampling our liberties and rights as a free society.

The irony is even when they capture the people trying to make things go boom such as the DC pipe person - they don’t do anything about it. They go after the real threats like “parading without a permit” or cancer grandmas taking photos.

Fuc him ..... he can flock off 🤬🤬

gee, it would be such a shame if some hooligans acted up on Halloween

Mass public surveillance is a violation of privacy rights!!!! It’s unconstitutional!!!!

FUPOSFC!! GFY I hope it catches your corrupt ass doing something , you and yours loser.

Ben said it best

When anyone tries to justify something by saying if you’re not doing anything wrong why do you care it’s a bad idea that infringes on your personal freedoms.

BREAKING: U.S. Attorney John Sarcone III has revealed the real purpose of Flock cameras—because nothing says “counterterrorism” like tracking pedestrians who might “possibly” look like they’re planning to blow something up. Sources say: The First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York argues that without these cameras, cops won’t know if someone is “walking around” with evil intentions—a phrase that sounds less like law enforcement and more like a paranoid sci-fi plot. Meanwhile, the same system that can’t tell a black SUV from a maroon one is now being pitched as our only defense against “terrorist acts” committed by people just… existing in public. The ACLU calls it mass surveillance; Sarcone calls it “detecting walking.” Here's why we care @SarcNY10520 : Documented Flock Safety (and similar ALPR) camera abuses primarily involve law enforcement officers using the systems for unauthorized personal purposes, most commonly stalking romantic partners, exes, their new partners, or other acquaintances. These are not official uses for crime investigation. Reports from the Institute for Justice, Washington Post, CNN, and local outlets indicate at least 50–69 officers have been accused, charged, fired, or resigned over misuse of license-plate reader systems (Flock involved in the large majority of analyzed cases, often ~46 of 50). Many more may go undetected due to limited auditing. The problem accelerated after 2024 as Flock’s network expanded (now 100,000–120,000+ cameras). Here is a selection of notable documented cases, ordered roughly chronologically by the period of misuse or when they became public (not exhaustive; many similar incidents exist across states including GA, WI, FL, KS, CA, TX, SC, MA, OH, IN, and others): Sedgwick, Kansas (2023): Police Chief Lee Nygaard tracked his ex-girlfriend’s vehicle ~164 times and her new boyfriend’s plate dozens of times. He allegedly followed the couple in a police vehicle and confronted them. He resigned; a state certification body cited the actions. Costa Mesa, California (around 2023–later charged): Officer Robert Jay Josett used Flock to track a mistress and her other partners. He pleaded guilty to related charges. Orange City, Florida (2024–2025): Officer Jarmarus Brown searched his ex-girlfriend’s plates more than 100 times (plus her parents’ plates dozens of times) over ~7 months and shared vehicle videos. He was arrested and charged. Milwaukee, Wisconsin (March–May 2025): Officer Josue Ayala searched the plate of a woman he was dating 124 times and her ex’s plate 55 times (~179 total). He listed reasons as “investigation.” He resigned, pleaded guilty to attempted misconduct in public office, and received probation/fine. The case came to light partly via public audit tools. Menasha, Wisconsin (October 2025 area): Officer Cristian Morales conducted unauthorized searches (including for an ex-girlfriend’s vehicles). Charged with misconduct in public office. Braselton, Georgia (discovered ~November 2025): Police chief used Flock to stalk multiple individuals (GBI log analysis). Arrested. Various Georgia cases (2025–mid-2026): Multiple departments (including Albany PD with 5 officers arrested/fired in July 2026 for personal/non-LE use; Cherokee County with 3 employees arrested after audits; DeKalb County Sgt. Kabiru Salawu fired/arrested; others in Greene, Richmond, Coffee, Fayetteville, etc.). Georgia alone saw ~17+ related arrests in a short period for misuse of license plate data and oath violations. Milwaukee, Wisconsin (follow-up, 2024–2025 activity charged July 2026): Detective Tehrangi Chapman (who had investigated the Ayala case) used Flock to track two people and allegedly installed a GPS device on one vehicle. Charged with felony misconduct and GPS misuse. Other 2026 examples:Albany, GA (July 2026): Five officers charged/fired after internal audit for personal Flock use. Greer, SC: Two officers fired for misuse. Stow, MA: Officer Jason Rogers allegedly tracked an ex via Flock and state databases; department cut ties with Flock and sought termination/charges. Indianapolis, IN: Officer searched wife’s and acquaintances’ vehicles ~3,759 times over 10 months; suspended pending investigation (flagged externally). Highland Heights, OH; Haines City, FL; Baytown, TX; Savannah, GA; and others with officers placed on leave, resigned, or charged for similar personal tracking (hundreds to thousands of searches in some cases). Cases involving abortion-related queries (e.g., Texas deputy searching networks for a woman alleged to have had a medication abortion; other cross-state sensitive searches reported). Additional patterns and systemic issues: Many cases involved officers entering vague reasons like “investigation,” “test,” or “training.” Some victims discovered tracking via public tools like or by filing complaints. Broader concerns (not always individual “abuses”): Unauthorized or unexpected data sharing with federal agencies (e.g., ICE, ATF), leading to dozens of cities canceling or rejecting Flock contracts; false positives; and limited proactive auditing until external pressure or self-audits. This list draws from major reporting through mid-to-late August 2026 and is not complete—new cases continue to surface as departments audit more thoroughly. BTW, in case you didn't know, for the fullest ongoing database, refer to the Institute for Justice’s ALPR abuse tracker. Your oath states: “I, [full name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” It would seem like a typical attorney who doesn't get what their ego wants, they are building a loophole to the constitution "For the children... sob sob" The only thing being debated now: Whether the next counterterrorism tool will be a camera that scans for suspicious breathing or just a badge that says “I’m Watching You Walk.” — ALLEGEDLY #SarconeSeesWalking #FlockOrFaceTerror @flocksafety #WalkingIsSuspicious @TheJusticeDept @NDNYnews

@ViKu1111 I've been trying to warn people for years what's happening

He didn’t read the constitutions he his bound by sworn oath to uphold. A false oath is perjury. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.

this guy def needs a camera in front of his house.

Privacy. People have the right to go about their lives without being continuously monitored like lab rats in some dystopian technocracy. “If you’re not doing anything wrong”: How about pursuing criminals, jailing repeat offenders and deporting illegals instead of building what Orwell warned us about! 🖕🖕

Everything since Jan 6 has been the government on every level circling the wagons because the public is hitting a tipping point against their tyranny and they are scared.

@Minohohoho Problem is they aren’t going after terror. They want the guy who went 20 over the speed limit on a motorcycle. Ban FLOCK!

‘Detect somebody walking around’… that’s not traffic enforcement. That’s full-on pedestrian surveillance. They just said the quiet part out loud.

Since when did Capitol blower uppers become a real threat worth giving up my freedom for?

How they sell it to you. They’ll say it’s for your safety. They’ll say it’s about efficiency. What they mean is: now they know who you are, where you are, what you’re doing. This isn’t progress – it’s control, plain and simple. Silence is just pain on a leash, STAND UP NOW

🚨🚨 They sell everything that erodes our freedom as for our safety. Just like the kill switches they're requiring in new cars " for our safety." Remember what they did to us during Covid. This is the infrastructure that they'll add facial recognition and digital currency to for total compliance. They need to be illegal.

So put the cameras around the state capital and important buildings, but they don’t need to be on every street corner in our neighborhoods.

How bout we lock all the criminals up, deport all the illegals & visa holders? Then there would be very few crimes to surveil?

How else will the stage be set for the antichrist to track and cut off anyone who excepts or denies the mark of the beast. 16 Also he compels all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead [signifying allegiance to the beast], 17 and that no one will be able to buy or sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. Let the person who has enough insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the [imperfect] number of a man; [g]and his number is [h]six hundred and sixty-six. Revelation 13:16-18

They let in terrorists through open borders so they can expand the police state.