Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

There really is hidden technology in this UFO stuff. We have quantum radars, communication systems, aneutronic fusion propulsion, and we've turned nukes into some kind of black hole superweapon. Jay Stratton reportedly is one of the gatekeepers, and Salvatore Pais told me Stratton blocked his research. Jason Jorjani told...

141,026 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Hal Puthoff tells Eric Burlison that Jay Stratton is who he needs to talk to about the legacy UFO program because he found it during AAWSAP but never got access Hal -“the AAWSAP program was started by Senator Harry Reid Reid and a couple of other senators at the time— Kind of looked from the outside into the legacy program, but then when you got— Well, to look outside in into the phenomena. So at the beginning, I don't think they recognized that there was a legacy program. It was only that in the process of carrying out the requirements of the AAWSAP program, began to realize, oh my God, there's more behind the scenes that we didn't even know about when we set up this program. And that's why I would suggest talking to Jay Stratton, part of the UAP Task Force because he was the one that began to collect data from here, there, and everywhere, and then identify gatekeepers and find out that there was a legacy program. And we never got access. I mean, the gatekeepers of the legacy program, even though we were, you know, even going for Kona Blue, we're supposed to be an SAP program, we still couldn't get access to the legacy programs. The security personnel involved in the Kona Blue thing found the gatekeepers, and the gatekeepers said, "We're not going to talk to you until you have an SAP." But we didn't get the SAP, so that never went anywhere. So those are really two completely separate enterprises.”

neandrewthal

30,968 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад