Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

There Should Be People Going to Prison Michael Laws, 8 Dec 2022: "We now know that whether you're vaxxed or not, it doesn't stop transmission, and the question you ask, is when did they know that? And if the answer to that question is we knew it before we... show more

Coronavirus Plushie

31,549 subscribers

43,863 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"Let me be very clear about this argument and discussion that has developed about age and about opportunities for young people," Maxine Waters tells Nicholas Wu. "I do believe that everybody should have the opportunity, with qualifications, to try and be a member of Congress, to try and be in positions for any of our regulatory agencies. I believe in the vote. "Now, having said that, I don't think we should talk about whether or not we should give up the mantle. I think it should be about supporting the idea that everybody should have an opportunity. Young people should run for these offices, and if they are competent, if they're capable, if they raise the money — if they do all of those things and they win, then they should have the seat. "For those of us who've been there, I want us to be absolutely looked at, to be criticized, to be examined, to see whether or not we have done what was expected of us and whether or not we have truly represented the people that have put us in these offices. "If we're not doing that, then we shouldn't be there, and we will probably not win our seats, but if we have, then ... we'll stay there. I'll be there. I'm not moving."

"Let me be very clear about this argument and discussion that has developed about age and about opportunities for young people," Maxine Waters tells Nicholas Wu. "I do believe that everybody should have the opportunity, with qualifications, to try and be a member of Congress, to try and be in positions for any of our regulatory agencies. I believe in the vote. "Now, having said that, I don't think we should talk about whether or not we should give up the mantle. I think it should be about supporting the idea that everybody should have an opportunity. Young people should run for these offices, and if they are competent, if they're capable, if they raise the money — if they do all of those things and they win, then they should have the seat. "For those of us who've been there, I want us to be absolutely looked at, to be criticized, to be examined, to see whether or not we have done what was expected of us and whether or not we have truly represented the people that have put us in these offices. "If we're not doing that, then we shouldn't be there, and we will probably not win our seats, but if we have, then ... we'll stay there. I'll be there. I'm not moving."

Semafor

89,788 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

neandrewthal

74,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEW: "The data that we have now all suggest that transmission that spread between people happens when people are symptomatic." "That gives us one layer of added protection to know when the risk is going to be greatest and how we can best protect the health and safety of the passenger and the American public."

NEW: "The data that we have now all suggest that transmission that spread between people happens when people are symptomatic." "That gives us one layer of added protection to know when the risk is going to be greatest and how we can best protect the health and safety of the passenger and the American public."

Fox News

75,811 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jasmine Crockett Says She Wants to Use Potential Dem Leadership Position to Keep Trump from 'K*lling Us' "So I’m looking forward to some of the things that we’re going to do on oversight as we continue to push back against this administration now that we know that they are doing things such as, you know, snatching people off the streets and throwing them down in what I would consider to be concentration camps or prisons." "And these are people that haven’t been convicted of anything, and it’s wrong. Listen, we have oversight over them. If we are in a contract with El Salvador, then it is us that have to decide as to whether or not they are violating human rights. And so we have to be given an opportunity to inspect. So even if James Comer says, ‘No, Democrats, you can’t go down there,’ we are elected members of the Oversight Committee, so we should be requiring that they turn over reports to us..." "We need to show up at their doors, and we need to conduct a field hearing right there at FDA. Same thing as it relates to the planes that are falling out of the sky." "We need some real transparency, and we need some honesty, and we need to make sure that the American people are just as enraged as we all should be, because this administration is truly trying to k*ll us, it feels like." Do you think Jasmine Crockett should be the leader of the Democratic Party?

Jasmine Crockett Says She Wants to Use Potential Dem Leadership Position to Keep Trump from 'Klling Us' "So I’m looking forward to some of the things that we’re going to do on oversight as we continue to push back against this administration now that we know that they are doing things such as, you know, snatching people off the streets and throwing them down in what I would consider to be concentration camps or prisons." "And these are people that haven’t been convicted of anything, and it’s wrong. Listen, we have oversight over them. If we are in a contract with El Salvador, then it is us that have to decide as to whether or not they are violating human rights. And so we have to be given an opportunity to inspect. So even if James Comer says, ‘No, Democrats, you can’t go down there,’ we are elected members of the Oversight Committee, so we should be requiring that they turn over reports to us..." "We need to show up at their doors, and we need to conduct a field hearing right there at FDA. Same thing as it relates to the planes that are falling out of the sky." "We need some real transparency, and we need some honesty, and we need to make sure that the American people are just as enraged as we all should be, because this administration is truly trying to kll us, it feels like." Do you think Jasmine Crockett should be the leader of the Democratic Party?

Kyle Becker

77,592 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau: India should understand that we’re not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago, In terms of saying, "Oh, you know, we’re going to let you be able to develop all these markets," and then the next thing we know, you’re beating us in a lot of commercial things. We’re going to make sure that whatever we do, it’s fair to our people, because ultimately we have to be accountable to our own people, just as the government of India has to be accountable to its people.

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau: India should understand that we’re not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago, In terms of saying, "Oh, you know, we’re going to let you be able to develop all these markets," and then the next thing we know, you’re beating us in a lot of commercial things. We’re going to make sure that whatever we do, it’s fair to our people, because ultimately we have to be accountable to our own people, just as the government of India has to be accountable to its people.

Clash Report

534,466 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“We think we got the guy, that they got the guy. That doesn’t mean we don’t have open questions: Who else knew about it? When did they know about it? Was there financing? Were people getting radicalized by certain groups or ideologies? We want to know all of that, and we're not going to rest until we get that.” Andrew Kolvet joins Real America with Dan Ball to dispel misinformation and help honor Charlie Kirk’s legacy. Watch more of the interview here

“We think we got the guy, that they got the guy. That doesn’t mean we don’t have open questions: Who else knew about it? When did they know about it? Was there financing? Were people getting radicalized by certain groups or ideologies? We want to know all of that, and we're not going to rest until we get that.” Andrew Kolvet joins Real America with Dan Ball to dispel misinformation and help honor Charlie Kirk’s legacy. Watch more of the interview here

One America News

55,875 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau: India should understand that we’re not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago, In terms of saying, "Oh, you know, we’re going to let you be able to develop all these markets," and then the next thing we know, you’re beating us in a lot of commercial things. We’re going to make sure that whatever we do, it’s fair to our people, because ultimately we have to be accountable to our own people, just as the government of India has to be accountable to its people.

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau: India should understand that we’re not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago, In terms of saying, "Oh, you know, we’re going to let you be able to develop all these markets," and then the next thing we know, you’re beating us in a lot of commercial things. We’re going to make sure that whatever we do, it’s fair to our people, because ultimately we have to be accountable to our own people, just as the government of India has to be accountable to its people.

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

18,023 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

PA Governor Josh Shapiro: America should never allow itself to be bullied by Israel Governor Josh Shapiro: “America should never be led around by any other nation. It should always be about America's interests, our national security interests. We should never, ever be bullied, as maybe President Trump was, by any other world leader.” @jason: “Why did he do it?” Gov. Shapiro: “First, Rubio went out and said he did it because if we didn't move then, Netanyahu was going to move and it was going to force our hand. Then they walked it back. He said seven or eight months ago that they destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and then came back seven or eight months later and said we had to go in because we had to destroy their nuclear capabilities. Then they said it was about regime change. Well, great. I mean, we went from an 80-something-year-old Ayatollah to a 60-something-year-old Ayatollah, who by all accounts, seems to be far more hardline. I'd hardly call that successful regime change. I don't know how you answer that question because the president never answered that question. He never sat in the Oval Office and looked the American people in the eye and said, ‘This is why we're going in.’ And you know what? This isn't semantics. This isn't politics. If you don't know why you're going in, you don't know how the hell to get out.”

PA Governor Josh Shapiro: America should never allow itself to be bullied by Israel Governor Josh Shapiro: “America should never be led around by any other nation. It should always be about America's interests, our national security interests. We should never, ever be bullied, as maybe President Trump was, by any other world leader.” @jason: “Why did he do it?” Gov. Shapiro: “First, Rubio went out and said he did it because if we didn't move then, Netanyahu was going to move and it was going to force our hand. Then they walked it back. He said seven or eight months ago that they destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and then came back seven or eight months later and said we had to go in because we had to destroy their nuclear capabilities. Then they said it was about regime change. Well, great. I mean, we went from an 80-something-year-old Ayatollah to a 60-something-year-old Ayatollah, who by all accounts, seems to be far more hardline. I'd hardly call that successful regime change. I don't know how you answer that question because the president never answered that question. He never sat in the Oval Office and looked the American people in the eye and said, ‘This is why we're going in.’ And you know what? This isn't semantics. This isn't politics. If you don't know why you're going in, you don't know how the hell to get out.”

The All-In Podcast

738,753 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

116,060 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi | Addressing the Raisina Dialogue 2026, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau says, "India should understand that we are not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago... Then the next thing we know, you are beating us in many commercial things..." "We are excited about the trade deal that is almost at the finish line now, and I think that that can be the basis for really unlocking almost limitless potential. We are very excited about focusing on India and these economic and commercial opportunities. But India should understand that we are not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago in terms of saying, "You will be able to develop all these markets, and then the next thing we know, you are beating us in a lot of commercial things." We are going to make sure that whatever we do is fair to our people because ultimately, we have to be accountable to our own people just as the government of India has to be accountable to its people..." (05.03)

#WATCH | Delhi | Addressing the Raisina Dialogue 2026, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau says, "India should understand that we are not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago... Then the next thing we know, you are beating us in many commercial things..." "We are excited about the trade deal that is almost at the finish line now, and I think that that can be the basis for really unlocking almost limitless potential. We are very excited about focusing on India and these economic and commercial opportunities. But India should understand that we are not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago in terms of saying, "You will be able to develop all these markets, and then the next thing we know, you are beating us in a lot of commercial things." We are going to make sure that whatever we do is fair to our people because ultimately, we have to be accountable to our own people just as the government of India has to be accountable to its people..." (05.03)

ANI

585,960 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Covid fan favorite Leana Wen is back, talking about what else but possible "asymptomatic" hantavirus spread "There may well be more cases that arise" "We know the incubation period is long" "Then the question becomes: Are we going to see cases of asymptomatic transmission?" "Right now we do not believe there is asymptomatic transmission. If there is, that would change things" "Also, it might change things too if we see cases in people who do not have direct connection with that cruise ship. For example, if there are passengers on board the flights or who are not on the cruise ships, or family members, if they start testing positive" "That requires careful monitoring"

Covid fan favorite Leana Wen is back, talking about what else but possible "asymptomatic" hantavirus spread "There may well be more cases that arise" "We know the incubation period is long" "Then the question becomes: Are we going to see cases of asymptomatic transmission?" "Right now we do not believe there is asymptomatic transmission. If there is, that would change things" "Also, it might change things too if we see cases in people who do not have direct connection with that cruise ship. For example, if there are passengers on board the flights or who are not on the cruise ships, or family members, if they start testing positive" "That requires careful monitoring"

Sense Receptor

88,285 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Austen Allred on Gauntlet AI: "We're very up front that we're 80 to 100 hours a week. If you think that that's a terrible idea, please don't come." "We're in Austin, all right? That's a sacrifice for a lot of people. If you don't think like coming to Austin for 100 hours a week and jamming on AI unpaid and just building stuff to figure out how much you can learn and hopefully getting a job on the other side... if you don't think that's awesome, that's totally fine. Please don't come." "There are some psychos out there that think that that's a good time. We wanna collect all those psychos. So come all, come all ye crazy people. And if that's not for you, that's okay." "There are companies that come to us and say, "Hey, we want, you know, 100 engineers that are going to sit in our division of printer drivers and sit there." And I'm like, "They would kill themselves." The people that are coming to Gauntlet would not do that. And so we turn companies down too." So we know who we are, we know what we stand for. You know, it helps that I'm one of those people that would've loved that. So is Ash Tilawat, and so is everybody else that works at Gauntlet. "So it's not hard for us to find other crazy people like ourselves. And that doesn't have to be you. That's okay." "We're not trying to empire build or solve all of humanity's greatest problems. We know that there's a limit to who we're addressing and what we're addressing at any given time." "So our goal is to be the best thing we can possibly be for that weird island of misfits. And for the companies that need a weird island of misfits, we'll be that all day long."

Austen Allred on Gauntlet AI: "We're very up front that we're 80 to 100 hours a week. If you think that that's a terrible idea, please don't come." "We're in Austin, all right? That's a sacrifice for a lot of people. If you don't think like coming to Austin for 100 hours a week and jamming on AI unpaid and just building stuff to figure out how much you can learn and hopefully getting a job on the other side... if you don't think that's awesome, that's totally fine. Please don't come." "There are some psychos out there that think that that's a good time. We wanna collect all those psychos. So come all, come all ye crazy people. And if that's not for you, that's okay." "There are companies that come to us and say, "Hey, we want, you know, 100 engineers that are going to sit in our division of printer drivers and sit there." And I'm like, "They would kill themselves." The people that are coming to Gauntlet would not do that. And so we turn companies down too." So we know who we are, we know what we stand for. You know, it helps that I'm one of those people that would've loved that. So is Ash Tilawat, and so is everybody else that works at Gauntlet. "So it's not hard for us to find other crazy people like ourselves. And that doesn't have to be you. That's okay." "We're not trying to empire build or solve all of humanity's greatest problems. We know that there's a limit to who we're addressing and what we're addressing at any given time." "So our goal is to be the best thing we can possibly be for that weird island of misfits. And for the companies that need a weird island of misfits, we'll be that all day long."

Ben Averbook

12,153 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten