Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

There's a famous technical study called Bollinger Bands. It covers trend, momentum, and volatility all in one, because that band automatically adjusts itself." "Out of 750 stocks, I only want stocks closing beyond 3.7 standard deviations. Normal setting is 2 standard deviations, that already covers 95% of all price...

RakeshPujara1's profile picture

Rakesh Pujara

16,720 subscribers

219,126 просмотров • 22 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииОбразованиеФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on AI agents and trading: "Everyone thinks that this is going to be all great and my agent's going to be trading for me." "What happens with all technology is the early adopters do have an easier time." "You're going to get some early wins, possibly if you're doing some kind of agentic trading, because not a lot of people are doing it." "At some point, if everyone's doing it, it becomes almost like if you're not doing it, you're at a disadvantage." "It's kind of like when you're the first accountant that used a spreadsheet in the 80s. I can get all of my work done for my business in one hour a day. And it used to be 10 hours a day." "But eventually everyone kind of figures it out and you're back to a level playing field." Vlad Tenev on Basis Points with amit and Steven Fiorillo
1:38

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on AI agents and trading: "Everyone thinks that this is going to be all great and my agent's going to be trading for me." "What happens with all technology is the early adopters do have an easier time." "You're going to get some early wins, possibly if you're doing some kind of agentic trading, because not a lot of people are doing it." "At some point, if everyone's doing it, it becomes almost like if you're not doing it, you're at a disadvantage." "It's kind of like when you're the first accountant that used a spreadsheet in the 80s. I can get all of my work done for my business in one hour a day. And it used to be 10 hours a day." "But eventually everyone kind of figures it out and you're back to a level playing field." Vlad Tenev on Basis Points with amit and Steven Fiorillo

a16z

126,223 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Ansem explains why people are so drawn to memecoins “One of the reasons dogecoin:native went so high is because you have this set of buyers who were never going to buy stocks. They didn't care about stocks at all and didn't have any money invested in the stock market” “They invested in Dogecoin because they related to the meme. They thought the meme was funny. It was fun to invest with their friends. Elon's attached to it. It was something they could understand easily and relate to” “I think it's discounted a lot how large that group of people is that will invest in whatever meme but won't invest in stocks” “If you look at Instagram, it has like 3B users but the holders of $META are only like 30M. There's only around 30M people that own Meta stock” “The reason Meta has value is because all the people on Instagram are spending a ton of time on that app, contributing a lot of value to the network by using their time and attention” “The people who are determining the value of this network typically don't have a stake in the upside” “If you can figure out a way to flip the social media model on its head where the people who are the reason the network has value also have upside in the value of the network, there's a complete regime change in how all these things operate” “I think one of the ways to do that is through memes” solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump
1:24

Ansem explains why people are so drawn to memecoins “One of the reasons dogecoin:native went so high is because you have this set of buyers who were never going to buy stocks. They didn't care about stocks at all and didn't have any money invested in the stock market” “They invested in Dogecoin because they related to the meme. They thought the meme was funny. It was fun to invest with their friends. Elon's attached to it. It was something they could understand easily and relate to” “I think it's discounted a lot how large that group of people is that will invest in whatever meme but won't invest in stocks” “If you look at Instagram, it has like 3B users but the holders of $META are only like 30M. There's only around 30M people that own Meta stock” “The reason Meta has value is because all the people on Instagram are spending a ton of time on that app, contributing a lot of value to the network by using their time and attention” “The people who are determining the value of this network typically don't have a stake in the upside” “If you can figure out a way to flip the social media model on its head where the people who are the reason the network has value also have upside in the value of the network, there's a complete regime change in how all these things operate” “I think one of the ways to do that is through memes” solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump

Jack

113,792 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."
2:25

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."

Patrick OShaughnessy

197,656 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Breadth is overrated. If you're trading the absolute best, leading stocks in the market, why does it matter what the thousands of other random stocks are doing? In bull markets, the best stocks can make monster moves for weeks/months on end while breadth inches lower and lower. And in bear markets (when breadth is bad), what good does it do to know where market breadth is if you're still going to only be trading the best of the best stocks based on the merit of the setups/stocks? It's just noise... Breadth was falling off a cliff in December 2024 as Quantum Computing stocks made some of the biggest speculative moves of this decade. Breadth diverged against the indexes and leading stocks for nearly 2 full years from mid-1998 to 2000, one of the best periods to trade of ALL TIME. Pundits and bears in the media would constantly harp on about how breadth was hitting 12-month lows while indexes continued going higher. Even Dan Zanger in Sept 1999 (a month before the NASDAQ exploded 50% higher in 2 months) expressed worry about the Accumulation/Distribution being "far more pronounced to the downside today than was 1929 and similar to 1987." However, he was right to say that "This in no way implies a crash, but does imply a high level of risk." And guess what he did? He deferred to setups on the leading stocks, and made one of the best audited performances of all time. “I at times wonder why I even look at breadth…it’s not needed if you just follow the process of the main strategy, it’ll do everything for you.” - Oliver Kell "If you throw every breadth indicator anyone's ever spoken about out the window, you're not gonna have any issues in my opinion." - Oliver Kell "I don’t look much at breadth, no, because some of the biggest winners...they’re gonna work anyways, some of the strongest sectors, they’re gonna work even if the breadth is low. Like usually what happens after market corrections is the first bounce, the breadth is insane like everything goes up, and for every leg higher (this is what we saw also this spring/summer) the breadth kinda deteriorates and deteriorates and fewer and fewer stocks and sectors going up. But our job is not to trade all of the stocks and sectors, our job is to trade the strongest stocks and sectors, so I don’t care what the breadth is. Or I do care, at some point it matters obviously, but you can just see doing your scanning which stocks are going up or not...breadth can also be very misleading..." - Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 If you're trading the top 10-50 stocks in the market, breadth most of the time IMO just adds noise to your process and takes attention away from more important things.
0:48

Breadth is overrated. If you're trading the absolute best, leading stocks in the market, why does it matter what the thousands of other random stocks are doing? In bull markets, the best stocks can make monster moves for weeks/months on end while breadth inches lower and lower. And in bear markets (when breadth is bad), what good does it do to know where market breadth is if you're still going to only be trading the best of the best stocks based on the merit of the setups/stocks? It's just noise... Breadth was falling off a cliff in December 2024 as Quantum Computing stocks made some of the biggest speculative moves of this decade. Breadth diverged against the indexes and leading stocks for nearly 2 full years from mid-1998 to 2000, one of the best periods to trade of ALL TIME. Pundits and bears in the media would constantly harp on about how breadth was hitting 12-month lows while indexes continued going higher. Even Dan Zanger in Sept 1999 (a month before the NASDAQ exploded 50% higher in 2 months) expressed worry about the Accumulation/Distribution being "far more pronounced to the downside today than was 1929 and similar to 1987." However, he was right to say that "This in no way implies a crash, but does imply a high level of risk." And guess what he did? He deferred to setups on the leading stocks, and made one of the best audited performances of all time. “I at times wonder why I even look at breadth…it’s not needed if you just follow the process of the main strategy, it’ll do everything for you.” - Oliver Kell "If you throw every breadth indicator anyone's ever spoken about out the window, you're not gonna have any issues in my opinion." - Oliver Kell "I don’t look much at breadth, no, because some of the biggest winners...they’re gonna work anyways, some of the strongest sectors, they’re gonna work even if the breadth is low. Like usually what happens after market corrections is the first bounce, the breadth is insane like everything goes up, and for every leg higher (this is what we saw also this spring/summer) the breadth kinda deteriorates and deteriorates and fewer and fewer stocks and sectors going up. But our job is not to trade all of the stocks and sectors, our job is to trade the strongest stocks and sectors, so I don’t care what the breadth is. Or I do care, at some point it matters obviously, but you can just see doing your scanning which stocks are going up or not...breadth can also be very misleading..." - Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 If you're trading the top 10-50 stocks in the market, breadth most of the time IMO just adds noise to your process and takes attention away from more important things.

Charlie M

32,209 просмотров • 1 год назад

Qullamaggie on Best Trading Books “There’s a couple more. These are the best ones. How to Make Money in Stocks by William O’Neil. This is just so good. I think it’s a fourth edition, the latest one. It’s just timeless. If you understand this, it catches everything that makes a stock make big moves. Every bull market there are certain stocks that make huge moves. This methodology developed CANSLIM. Pretty much you look for stocks that have price momentum and earnings momentum. Pretty much the same way I trade. Well, I used to trade before the market crashed and stopped me out of everything. It’s super super good. Then Reminiscences of a Stock Operator. It’s about Jesse Livermore, one of the most famous traders of all time. There are so many timeless lessons in this book. It’s just incredibly good. And we have the Market Wizards books, which are interviews by Jack Schwager of a bunch of successful traders. There’s so many good lessons in here. I think there’s three or four of these books he’s been releasing, like every five to eight years. I recommend all of them. Yeah, Reminiscences of a Stock Operator is just so good. Kovell, Trend Following is pretty good too. I have that one in ebook format. I don’t have it in physical format but I should probably order it. Trend Following by Kovell. I agree this is a pretty good one too. There’s maybe a few more.”
2:14

Qullamaggie on Best Trading Books “There’s a couple more. These are the best ones. How to Make Money in Stocks by William O’Neil. This is just so good. I think it’s a fourth edition, the latest one. It’s just timeless. If you understand this, it catches everything that makes a stock make big moves. Every bull market there are certain stocks that make huge moves. This methodology developed CANSLIM. Pretty much you look for stocks that have price momentum and earnings momentum. Pretty much the same way I trade. Well, I used to trade before the market crashed and stopped me out of everything. It’s super super good. Then Reminiscences of a Stock Operator. It’s about Jesse Livermore, one of the most famous traders of all time. There are so many timeless lessons in this book. It’s just incredibly good. And we have the Market Wizards books, which are interviews by Jack Schwager of a bunch of successful traders. There’s so many good lessons in here. I think there’s three or four of these books he’s been releasing, like every five to eight years. I recommend all of them. Yeah, Reminiscences of a Stock Operator is just so good. Kovell, Trend Following is pretty good too. I have that one in ebook format. I don’t have it in physical format but I should probably order it. Trend Following by Kovell. I agree this is a pretty good one too. There’s maybe a few more.”

Lone

22,265 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Qullamaggie on The Key Is to Outperform “You’re only up 20%, well, it could be that you’ve been trading the wrong stocks or you’ve been in mediocre stocks. If you know you should have been trading the solars, the EV names, or the spec names over the past six months, you probably have been trading the wrong stocks. If you haven’t at least traded some solar or speck, or EV battery names. You’re up 550% this year. Yeah, that’s good, but 40% is still good as well, though it also depends if you’re using margin or not. If you’re up 20% in the past month and a half without using any margin, that’s still good. It’s not bad at all, it’s okay. The key is to outperform; that really is the key. If the market is up 10%, you should be up 30% or 50%. That’s really the point of why we are here. That’s why you focus on these higher ADR stocks because we know we don’t bother with the slow stocks. Let the mediocre traders trade the slow stocks, the low momentum stocks, and the sectors that are not hot. Let other people trade them. We want to be where the money is; that’s our job.”
1:19

Qullamaggie on The Key Is to Outperform “You’re only up 20%, well, it could be that you’ve been trading the wrong stocks or you’ve been in mediocre stocks. If you know you should have been trading the solars, the EV names, or the spec names over the past six months, you probably have been trading the wrong stocks. If you haven’t at least traded some solar or speck, or EV battery names. You’re up 550% this year. Yeah, that’s good, but 40% is still good as well, though it also depends if you’re using margin or not. If you’re up 20% in the past month and a half without using any margin, that’s still good. It’s not bad at all, it’s okay. The key is to outperform; that really is the key. If the market is up 10%, you should be up 30% or 50%. That’s really the point of why we are here. That’s why you focus on these higher ADR stocks because we know we don’t bother with the slow stocks. Let the mediocre traders trade the slow stocks, the low momentum stocks, and the sectors that are not hot. Let other people trade them. We want to be where the money is; that’s our job.”

Lone

17,820 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Qullamaggie on Why You Are Always in a Drawdown “You're never gonna sell everything at the top. Just get that thought out of your head. You're gonna be in a drawdown probably 99% of the time. Remember that. You can make 500% in a year and be in a drawdown 95% of the time. That's just how it works. If anyone's gonna tell you otherwise, they're a liar and probably trying to sell you something. Look at stuff like NFLX over the past 10 years or AMZN. One of the best performing stocks over 10 years. You can see it spent like, what, 2/3 of the time in a drawdown. Now it's in a drawdown again. Where this ends, who knows. That's just how it works. No matter how good or bad your returns are, you're gonna spend most of the time in a drawdown. No matter what. Only time you're not gonna do that, if you’re a day trader or scalper, one of these guys that make 50 bucks per day and they're super happy about it. They make like 500 trades, end up with 50 bucks.”
1:56

Qullamaggie on Why You Are Always in a Drawdown “You're never gonna sell everything at the top. Just get that thought out of your head. You're gonna be in a drawdown probably 99% of the time. Remember that. You can make 500% in a year and be in a drawdown 95% of the time. That's just how it works. If anyone's gonna tell you otherwise, they're a liar and probably trying to sell you something. Look at stuff like NFLX over the past 10 years or AMZN. One of the best performing stocks over 10 years. You can see it spent like, what, 2/3 of the time in a drawdown. Now it's in a drawdown again. Where this ends, who knows. That's just how it works. No matter how good or bad your returns are, you're gonna spend most of the time in a drawdown. No matter what. Only time you're not gonna do that, if you’re a day trader or scalper, one of these guys that make 50 bucks per day and they're super happy about it. They make like 500 trades, end up with 50 bucks.”

Lone

13,508 просмотров • 1 год назад

Geno Auriemma shares how he explains success to his players and why showing up isn't enough. "If you go to class and you do average work, you're gonna get a C. That's why it's called average." "If you want a B, you have to do more work. If you want an A, you have to do even more work and you have to give up stuff." You get what you earn in life. "You have to sacrifice. Maybe you can't do all the things that everybody else does." It means if you want more then you have to be willing to do more. "If you're just happy getting Bs all your life, there's nothing wrong with that either. But you're never gonna get the satisfaction of what it feels like to get an A." Then he connected it to basketball: "If you just wanna be average, then you do average work. If you wanna be a little bit above average then you do a little more work." "If you wanna get As in basketball, then you gotta do stuff that other people aren't willing to do - especially if you have the talent like we do. We have talent." It means bring a mindset of excellence to everything that you do. Excellence isn't the goal - it's the standard you set. Then he called out the entitlement problem: "Some of these younger guys coming out of high school, man, they wanna show up and go, 'I'm here. Where's my 3.7?'" "Like my father used to say, 'I got your 3.7 right here.'" Showing up doesn't earn you anything. Doing the work does. You get the grade you earn - in school, in basketball, and in life. It's easy to be average...successful people look to compete in everything they do. (🎥UCTV Sports )
1:20

Geno Auriemma shares how he explains success to his players and why showing up isn't enough. "If you go to class and you do average work, you're gonna get a C. That's why it's called average." "If you want a B, you have to do more work. If you want an A, you have to do even more work and you have to give up stuff." You get what you earn in life. "You have to sacrifice. Maybe you can't do all the things that everybody else does." It means if you want more then you have to be willing to do more. "If you're just happy getting Bs all your life, there's nothing wrong with that either. But you're never gonna get the satisfaction of what it feels like to get an A." Then he connected it to basketball: "If you just wanna be average, then you do average work. If you wanna be a little bit above average then you do a little more work." "If you wanna get As in basketball, then you gotta do stuff that other people aren't willing to do - especially if you have the talent like we do. We have talent." It means bring a mindset of excellence to everything that you do. Excellence isn't the goal - it's the standard you set. Then he called out the entitlement problem: "Some of these younger guys coming out of high school, man, they wanna show up and go, 'I'm here. Where's my 3.7?'" "Like my father used to say, 'I got your 3.7 right here.'" Showing up doesn't earn you anything. Doing the work does. You get the grade you earn - in school, in basketball, and in life. It's easy to be average...successful people look to compete in everything they do. (🎥UCTV Sports )

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

150,580 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bad News for Stocks and Real Estate: Chamath Explains The Great Economic Reset In the tweet below, Chamath Palihapitiya points out that Trump has two core constituencies that are generally asset-light: 1) young people 2) working-class / middle-class On E217, Chamath Palihapitiya broke down his thoughts: "I tend to be in the Stevie Cohen camp. It's not like the bottom is going to fall out, but there's a lot of room for concern." -- In a recent interview, Steven Cohen said that a combination of tariffs, slowing immigration, and DOGE has him bearish in the short-term. -- "I'm actually pretty negative for the first time in a while. It wouldn't surprise me to see a significant correction." Chamath agreed: "It is bad news for the stock market and it is bad news for asset owners." " I think people want this austerity." " So if you are going to feed your constituents and your constituents don't own stocks and your constituents don't own homes, or they are so wealthy that they can be inoculated from a massive drawdown in those asset categories, what do you think the winning strategy is?" " If you want to cement political power, I think it requires a walking down of these asset markets in a meaningful way." "That's stocks and that's real estate." "And I just don't see any other way around it."
1:12

Bad News for Stocks and Real Estate: Chamath Explains The Great Economic Reset In the tweet below, Chamath Palihapitiya points out that Trump has two core constituencies that are generally asset-light: 1) young people 2) working-class / middle-class On E217, Chamath Palihapitiya broke down his thoughts: "I tend to be in the Stevie Cohen camp. It's not like the bottom is going to fall out, but there's a lot of room for concern." -- In a recent interview, Steven Cohen said that a combination of tariffs, slowing immigration, and DOGE has him bearish in the short-term. -- "I'm actually pretty negative for the first time in a while. It wouldn't surprise me to see a significant correction." Chamath agreed: "It is bad news for the stock market and it is bad news for asset owners." " I think people want this austerity." " So if you are going to feed your constituents and your constituents don't own stocks and your constituents don't own homes, or they are so wealthy that they can be inoculated from a massive drawdown in those asset categories, what do you think the winning strategy is?" " If you want to cement political power, I think it requires a walking down of these asset markets in a meaningful way." "That's stocks and that's real estate." "And I just don't see any other way around it."

The All-In Podcast

126,048 просмотров • 1 год назад

𝗤 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀. It's just these simple patterns. I talk about it all the time. These channels, like you have a big momentum stock, goes up a lot, builds a channel. You have a big momentum stock, it builds a channel this way. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe does something like this with higher lows. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe goes up a lot and then maybe does something like this. These triangles and channels. High-tight flags. It's the same patterns over and over again. It doesn't matter if you learn them from Minervini, Dan Zanger, it's the same things, or Stockbee, right? It's the same things over and over. It's just so easy. You just need to train your brain to see these patterns on the strongest stocks. That's the key. The strongest stocks, not some random piece of shit. People keep posting these random stocks that have these bull flags, but you need the strongest stocks. You don't have an edge trading some random shit stock that happens to have a good chart pattern. I get these every day, people are posting and asking me about them. It has to be a momentum leader. Just the same patterns over... just look at the stocks I'm in, right? NVDA, I bought it last week, okay? Very simple. A big momentum stock, look at the pattern. What is it? Do you see this? Do you see this pattern? I bought it here. NIO, I bought it a couple of days ago. What's the pattern, right? Do you see it? I bought it on this day here, like somewhere here, right? LVGO, what's the pattern? Okay, I bought it here, so it was a little bit of a chase. FSLY, I bought it here. What's the pattern? You see this? DDOG, where did I buy it? I bought it here. This wasn't a clean one, but it was showing relative strength. But again, same patterns. You see higher lows and Z, I bought it here. I also bought it here initially. The same patterns over and over again. There's absolutely no rocket science involved. Anyone who's trying to sell you rocket science, just unfollow them and run the other way. They're all frauds. They don't make any money. Same thing, these simple patterns: triangles, channels, high-tight flags. We bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I also bought TSLA down here. Same thing. This is just the same patterns over and over again. All you have to do to succeed in the stock market is don't be a fucking retard. Really. I mean, really. That's all you have to do. You don't need any intelligence to make tens of millions. All you need to know is risk management, portfolio management, and these patterns. And then you need to have sit-out power when the market is bad. That's all you need. You literally need five things. And yes, CRWD... where did I buy it? On this day here. You see the pattern. LAC, I bought it here. You see the pattern. I bought it here, or was it here? I don't remember. One of... the same thing over and over again. Exactly, the big... yeah, exactly. All the... Zanger, Jesse Livermore, Darvas, Ruppel, O'Neil... exactly, it's the same thing. They're all momentum traders. They trade these momentum stocks, relative strength stocks, the stocks that funds are dying to get in, okay? You want the stocks that the funds want to buy, okay? The funds leave footprints, the big institutions, they leave footprints. Your job is to sniff out the stocks the funds are buying. You don't want some piece-of-shit random stock. You're never going to make money over time. You want buyers coming in after you.
3:30

𝗤 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀. It's just these simple patterns. I talk about it all the time. These channels, like you have a big momentum stock, goes up a lot, builds a channel. You have a big momentum stock, it builds a channel this way. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe does something like this with higher lows. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe goes up a lot and then maybe does something like this. These triangles and channels. High-tight flags. It's the same patterns over and over again. It doesn't matter if you learn them from Minervini, Dan Zanger, it's the same things, or Stockbee, right? It's the same things over and over. It's just so easy. You just need to train your brain to see these patterns on the strongest stocks. That's the key. The strongest stocks, not some random piece of shit. People keep posting these random stocks that have these bull flags, but you need the strongest stocks. You don't have an edge trading some random shit stock that happens to have a good chart pattern. I get these every day, people are posting and asking me about them. It has to be a momentum leader. Just the same patterns over... just look at the stocks I'm in, right? NVDA, I bought it last week, okay? Very simple. A big momentum stock, look at the pattern. What is it? Do you see this? Do you see this pattern? I bought it here. NIO, I bought it a couple of days ago. What's the pattern, right? Do you see it? I bought it on this day here, like somewhere here, right? LVGO, what's the pattern? Okay, I bought it here, so it was a little bit of a chase. FSLY, I bought it here. What's the pattern? You see this? DDOG, where did I buy it? I bought it here. This wasn't a clean one, but it was showing relative strength. But again, same patterns. You see higher lows and Z, I bought it here. I also bought it here initially. The same patterns over and over again. There's absolutely no rocket science involved. Anyone who's trying to sell you rocket science, just unfollow them and run the other way. They're all frauds. They don't make any money. Same thing, these simple patterns: triangles, channels, high-tight flags. We bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I also bought TSLA down here. Same thing. This is just the same patterns over and over again. All you have to do to succeed in the stock market is don't be a fucking retard. Really. I mean, really. That's all you have to do. You don't need any intelligence to make tens of millions. All you need to know is risk management, portfolio management, and these patterns. And then you need to have sit-out power when the market is bad. That's all you need. You literally need five things. And yes, CRWD... where did I buy it? On this day here. You see the pattern. LAC, I bought it here. You see the pattern. I bought it here, or was it here? I don't remember. One of... the same thing over and over again. Exactly, the big... yeah, exactly. All the... Zanger, Jesse Livermore, Darvas, Ruppel, O'Neil... exactly, it's the same thing. They're all momentum traders. They trade these momentum stocks, relative strength stocks, the stocks that funds are dying to get in, okay? You want the stocks that the funds want to buy, okay? The funds leave footprints, the big institutions, they leave footprints. Your job is to sniff out the stocks the funds are buying. You don't want some piece-of-shit random stock. You're never going to make money over time. You want buyers coming in after you.

Qullamaggie Wisdom

14,653 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Qullamaggie on the Importance of Leading Stocks “And like people post setups all the time on my stream. People post setups all the time, and this is the hard part — identifying a really good setup versus something that’s random and mediocre. Because that’s gonna also reflect on your results. If you trade the random setups, your results are gonna be random too. You want to find the outlier stocks. You want to see if it has relative strength. The best time to trade this breakout method is after a pullback in the markets. You want to see the stocks that held up the most — the ones that had big moves previously and held up the most. And if you master this setup, if you trade this setup coming out of a small correction, like say a 5-10 or 15% correction in the overall indices, that’s almost like free money for this type of setup. Because if you can identify the stocks that held up the most during the correction — that maybe went down initially but then stopped going down as the correction went on, and actually started building higher lows — that’s telling you something. If you have a stock that’s gone up a lot, and then it stops going down when the market goes down, you know the stock is trying to tell you something. And that’s what leading stocks do. Like every bull market, this is obviously the case. I’m gonna talk more about it later. You obviously need an up-trending or sideways market to trade this method. You have leading stocks — the stocks that go up the most and are the most liquid. And those are really the stocks you want to trade. They’re mostly mid and large caps, but even a small cap can be a leading stock. Those are really the stocks that don’t go down when the market goes down. It’s like you try to push a tennis ball underwater — it just pops back up. And those are the type of stocks you want to find when trading this method.”
2:20

Qullamaggie on the Importance of Leading Stocks “And like people post setups all the time on my stream. People post setups all the time, and this is the hard part — identifying a really good setup versus something that’s random and mediocre. Because that’s gonna also reflect on your results. If you trade the random setups, your results are gonna be random too. You want to find the outlier stocks. You want to see if it has relative strength. The best time to trade this breakout method is after a pullback in the markets. You want to see the stocks that held up the most — the ones that had big moves previously and held up the most. And if you master this setup, if you trade this setup coming out of a small correction, like say a 5-10 or 15% correction in the overall indices, that’s almost like free money for this type of setup. Because if you can identify the stocks that held up the most during the correction — that maybe went down initially but then stopped going down as the correction went on, and actually started building higher lows — that’s telling you something. If you have a stock that’s gone up a lot, and then it stops going down when the market goes down, you know the stock is trying to tell you something. And that’s what leading stocks do. Like every bull market, this is obviously the case. I’m gonna talk more about it later. You obviously need an up-trending or sideways market to trade this method. You have leading stocks — the stocks that go up the most and are the most liquid. And those are really the stocks you want to trade. They’re mostly mid and large caps, but even a small cap can be a leading stock. Those are really the stocks that don’t go down when the market goes down. It’s like you try to push a tennis ball underwater — it just pops back up. And those are the type of stocks you want to find when trading this method.”

Lone

14,473 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Warren Buffett: "99% of people should invest this way": In Warren Buffett's lecture to University of Florida students in 1998, he shared his view on diversification: "If you are not a professional investor, if your goal is not to manage money in such a way so that you get a significantly better return than the world, then I believe in extreme diversification. I believe 98%–99%, maybe more than 99% of people, who invest should extensively diversify and not trade. So that leads them to an index fund type of decision with very low costs. All they are going to do is own part of America. And they made a decision that owning a part of America is worthwhile. I don’t quarrel with that at all. That is the way they should approach it unless they want to bring an intensity to the game to make a decision and start evaluating businesses." The bottom line 👇 For most investors, the smartest & simplest move to get started is with low-cost index funds. And diversifying broadly. Then, if you want to pick individual stocks, you can do that on the side (with perhaps 2-5% of your portfolio). First earn the market return, then you can try to beat it.
0:42

Warren Buffett: "99% of people should invest this way": In Warren Buffett's lecture to University of Florida students in 1998, he shared his view on diversification: "If you are not a professional investor, if your goal is not to manage money in such a way so that you get a significantly better return than the world, then I believe in extreme diversification. I believe 98%–99%, maybe more than 99% of people, who invest should extensively diversify and not trade. So that leads them to an index fund type of decision with very low costs. All they are going to do is own part of America. And they made a decision that owning a part of America is worthwhile. I don’t quarrel with that at all. That is the way they should approach it unless they want to bring an intensity to the game to make a decision and start evaluating businesses." The bottom line 👇 For most investors, the smartest & simplest move to get started is with low-cost index funds. And diversifying broadly. Then, if you want to pick individual stocks, you can do that on the side (with perhaps 2-5% of your portfolio). First earn the market return, then you can try to beat it.

Money Wisdom

35,462 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

All You Need Is Here —— 13 Qullamaggie's Stock and ETF Scans Intraday Scans "Which screen filters my scans? Sure. This is my 'Strongest' scan. These scans are for a specific watchlist I have of the strongest stocks—most of them are growth stocks. Then, like EPs, these are stocks that gap up 7.5% or are up at least 7.5% above yesterday's price, with at least $15 million in dollar volume. Then I have my Momentum watchlist. It’s also a specific watchlist where I pretty much scan for stocks that are up today in that watchlist above yesterday’s highs. This OTC scan... you don’t have to look at that, I’m gonna take it off. I don’t trade OTCs ever; they’ve been dead for many years. For my ETF scan, I look for $30 million in dollar volume and a 6% ADR (Average Daily Range). Then I have Lower Liquidity / Higher ADR scans. These are pretty much stocks that are not very liquid but have a very high ADR, so you can take a smaller position and still make decent money because the stock is likely to make a bigger move. So those are my intraday scans." Weekend & Overnight Scans "Then I have my weekend and overnight scans, which I use to build my watchlists. Pretty much, I scan for the strongest stocks on every timeframe—like one month, six months, three months, two years, one and a half years, etc. They all look the same: $60 million in dollar volume, 3.5% ADR, and ranked among the 7% strongest. The only difference is the timeframe. Then I also scan for the Biggest 5-Day Gainers: $60 million dollar volume and up 25% in the past five days. For ADRs (foreign stocks), you have to scan for them separately in TC2000: $60 million in dollar volume and 3% ADR. So those are pretty much my main scans. Then I also scan for our Biggest Losers on one and two-year timeframes just to find the beaten-down names that could make big moves."
2:23

All You Need Is Here —— 13 Qullamaggie's Stock and ETF Scans Intraday Scans "Which screen filters my scans? Sure. This is my 'Strongest' scan. These scans are for a specific watchlist I have of the strongest stocks—most of them are growth stocks. Then, like EPs, these are stocks that gap up 7.5% or are up at least 7.5% above yesterday's price, with at least $15 million in dollar volume. Then I have my Momentum watchlist. It’s also a specific watchlist where I pretty much scan for stocks that are up today in that watchlist above yesterday’s highs. This OTC scan... you don’t have to look at that, I’m gonna take it off. I don’t trade OTCs ever; they’ve been dead for many years. For my ETF scan, I look for $30 million in dollar volume and a 6% ADR (Average Daily Range). Then I have Lower Liquidity / Higher ADR scans. These are pretty much stocks that are not very liquid but have a very high ADR, so you can take a smaller position and still make decent money because the stock is likely to make a bigger move. So those are my intraday scans." Weekend & Overnight Scans "Then I have my weekend and overnight scans, which I use to build my watchlists. Pretty much, I scan for the strongest stocks on every timeframe—like one month, six months, three months, two years, one and a half years, etc. They all look the same: $60 million in dollar volume, 3.5% ADR, and ranked among the 7% strongest. The only difference is the timeframe. Then I also scan for the Biggest 5-Day Gainers: $60 million dollar volume and up 25% in the past five days. For ADRs (foreign stocks), you have to scan for them separately in TC2000: $60 million in dollar volume and 3% ADR. So those are pretty much my main scans. Then I also scan for our Biggest Losers on one and two-year timeframes just to find the beaten-down names that could make big moves."

Will Hu

17,836 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"I might be losing my next election over this. You have to get in a head space where you're ok with that, and too many of my colleagues are not ok with losing their next election if that is what it costs." In this clip from the My Price is My Life podcast, Rep. Thomas Massie and I talk about the Epstein files, the survivors, Donald Trump, and the politics surrounding it all. Watch the full episode at
2:43

"I might be losing my next election over this. You have to get in a head space where you're ok with that, and too many of my colleagues are not ok with losing their next election if that is what it costs." In this clip from the My Price is My Life podcast, Rep. Thomas Massie and I talk about the Epstein files, the survivors, Donald Trump, and the politics surrounding it all. Watch the full episode at

James O'Keefe

594,904 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Ken Griffin was asked if AI could tell you which stocks to buy, before he bought the entire book of Leopold Aschenbrenner: "there are people that have a fantasy that LLMs are going to tell you which stocks to buy - and it's just a fantasy, just a fantasy" "but wouldn't they be smart enough to tell you which stocks to buy?" - "no, because they're not smart, they're just programmed - they are very good at thoughtfully regurgitating" this is him explaining why he thinks the productivity gains everyone is pricing in are still years away, why Nvidia reminds him of the California gold rush, and what he says is the one risk the market is completely missing "it's not clear to me that we're going to get the productivity gains out of AI that the market's broadly hoping for - they're not about to happen in the next 12 or 24 or 36 months" "this is like the gold mining in California - those that sold the picks made a lot of money - and Nvidia right now sells one of the most important ingredients in the AI story" "the question with every investment is whether or not it's the right price - that's the fundamental of investing" bookmark & watch the full conversation ↓
14:09

Ken Griffin was asked if AI could tell you which stocks to buy, before he bought the entire book of Leopold Aschenbrenner: "there are people that have a fantasy that LLMs are going to tell you which stocks to buy - and it's just a fantasy, just a fantasy" "but wouldn't they be smart enough to tell you which stocks to buy?" - "no, because they're not smart, they're just programmed - they are very good at thoughtfully regurgitating" this is him explaining why he thinks the productivity gains everyone is pricing in are still years away, why Nvidia reminds him of the California gold rush, and what he says is the one risk the market is completely missing "it's not clear to me that we're going to get the productivity gains out of AI that the market's broadly hoping for - they're not about to happen in the next 12 or 24 or 36 months" "this is like the gold mining in California - those that sold the picks made a lot of money - and Nvidia right now sells one of the most important ingredients in the AI story" "the question with every investment is whether or not it's the right price - that's the fundamental of investing" bookmark & watch the full conversation ↓

Сarm1ne

215,706 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 WATCH: Fox’s Piers Morgan on tariffs: “Unlike 99% of people on social media, I am a 100% certain I have no idea if this is going to work. Everyone is either completely sure it's the greatest transformation thing we've ever seen in economic history or a complete and utter disaster. And it seems to me that, like with a lot of things that Trump does, it’s probably best to just take a beat, wait a bit, and see how this plays out.” “In particular, see how all the countries respond. You're already beginning to see some movement with some of these countries racing to do a deal with Trump. If enough of them start to do that, you'll see the markets - who are basically like a bunch of lemmings running over a cliff at the best of times - will roll back at the first sign that any of this appears to be working.” “However, and I think it's an important caveat, this is one hell of a roll of the dice. Because if you're out there and and you're already struggling from a cost of living crisis and you've got savings and maybe you've got some stocks and so on, you are looking at this and you're worried, you're concerned for your family.” “And I think that, Trump has gotta look at this very carefully, and he's got to pull out the art of the deal in spectacular fashion. Now I I would just say I wouldn't bet against him. I look at what he's done with the Southern Border in two months, which has been little short of miraculous, and he's had hardly any credit for it.” “So I'm prepared to give him a little bit of time and a chance, and I think everybody should, to see if this works. But if in two months' time, it's not working, the pain could be pretty enormous, and that could be presidency threatening. So the stakes are high.“
1:36

🚨 WATCH: Fox’s Piers Morgan on tariffs: “Unlike 99% of people on social media, I am a 100% certain I have no idea if this is going to work. Everyone is either completely sure it's the greatest transformation thing we've ever seen in economic history or a complete and utter disaster. And it seems to me that, like with a lot of things that Trump does, it’s probably best to just take a beat, wait a bit, and see how this plays out.” “In particular, see how all the countries respond. You're already beginning to see some movement with some of these countries racing to do a deal with Trump. If enough of them start to do that, you'll see the markets - who are basically like a bunch of lemmings running over a cliff at the best of times - will roll back at the first sign that any of this appears to be working.” “However, and I think it's an important caveat, this is one hell of a roll of the dice. Because if you're out there and and you're already struggling from a cost of living crisis and you've got savings and maybe you've got some stocks and so on, you are looking at this and you're worried, you're concerned for your family.” “And I think that, Trump has gotta look at this very carefully, and he's got to pull out the art of the deal in spectacular fashion. Now I I would just say I wouldn't bet against him. I look at what he's done with the Southern Border in two months, which has been little short of miraculous, and he's had hardly any credit for it.” “So I'm prepared to give him a little bit of time and a chance, and I think everybody should, to see if this works. But if in two months' time, it's not working, the pain could be pretty enormous, and that could be presidency threatening. So the stakes are high.“

TV News Now

420,106 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Coinbase is going after Schwab, Robinhood, and the banks. They want to swallow the entire stack at once. Stocks, options, retirement, credit card, and let AI trade your account while you sleep" "The most interesting one is Coinbase Advisor. They're calling it one of the first SEC-registered AI-powered investment advisors. You talk to it in plain English and it acts on your accounts" "If you're SEC-registered as a human, you have a fiduciary duty. People who are not registered are not allowed to give financial advice. How they're going to swing this with AI, I have no idea" "They've basically offered to do everything except babysit your kids, but I would assume that's probably coming in Q3"
1:22

"Coinbase is going after Schwab, Robinhood, and the banks. They want to swallow the entire stack at once. Stocks, options, retirement, credit card, and let AI trade your account while you sleep" "The most interesting one is Coinbase Advisor. They're calling it one of the first SEC-registered AI-powered investment advisors. You talk to it in plain English and it acts on your accounts" "If you're SEC-registered as a human, you have a fiduciary duty. People who are not registered are not allowed to give financial advice. How they're going to swing this with AI, I have no idea" "They've basically offered to do everything except babysit your kids, but I would assume that's probably coming in Q3"

The Wolf Of All Streets

34,286 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Qullamaggie on Track and Trade Stocks With Triple Digit EPS and Revenue Growth “This EXPI has triple-digit EPS and revenue, bro. It’s going straight up. This is what happens, guys. This is why you should keep track of all of these high-growth stocks with momentum, okay? They need to be in a watchlist. You need to keep track of this. This thing is up 1000% in like eight months or something. Another one is FUTU, okay? Another one, triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Look at this thing; it’s up like what? Also, 1000% in like eight, nine months, ten months. If you’re looking for an edge, one place to start is tracking stocks that have triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Just a hint. TIGR too, another one. China brokerage, yeah. Triple digit since March lows. This thing is up 600%. I mean, earnings are fuel, okay? I mean, you have these random pump stocks that can make big moves with no reason really other than, you know, chat rooms and forums are pumping these. But earnings that’s fuel, okay? It’s like rocket fuel—triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. It’s like rocket fuel; it gives stocks a reason to go up. One way to trade - you don’t even need to do any scans. Just build a watch list of the fifty or thirty fastest-growing stocks in the stock market, like everything just, you know everything. They don’t necessarily have to be like triple-digit EPS and revenue growth, but everything is that say fifty percent like mid-high double-digit EPS. Revenue growth or higher, keep them in a watch list. The top say 50 ones, and just look for setups on those stocks, and you’re gonna outperform the market by a wide margin. Year after year, you don’t need to do any scans at all. You just keep track of that one watchlist with fifty stocks and just look for good setups on those among those. That’s all you need to do to get a big edge. Now you’re not gonna outperform like every market rally because in some markets cyclicals lead or beaten down stocks lead. But if you only trade the fastest growing stocks, you probably gonna do very well year after year after year. No rocket science involved; you don’t need any fancy indicators. You don’t need someone on TV to tell you this or that because you already know what works in the stock market.”
2:54

Qullamaggie on Track and Trade Stocks With Triple Digit EPS and Revenue Growth “This EXPI has triple-digit EPS and revenue, bro. It’s going straight up. This is what happens, guys. This is why you should keep track of all of these high-growth stocks with momentum, okay? They need to be in a watchlist. You need to keep track of this. This thing is up 1000% in like eight months or something. Another one is FUTU, okay? Another one, triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Look at this thing; it’s up like what? Also, 1000% in like eight, nine months, ten months. If you’re looking for an edge, one place to start is tracking stocks that have triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Just a hint. TIGR too, another one. China brokerage, yeah. Triple digit since March lows. This thing is up 600%. I mean, earnings are fuel, okay? I mean, you have these random pump stocks that can make big moves with no reason really other than, you know, chat rooms and forums are pumping these. But earnings that’s fuel, okay? It’s like rocket fuel—triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. It’s like rocket fuel; it gives stocks a reason to go up. One way to trade - you don’t even need to do any scans. Just build a watch list of the fifty or thirty fastest-growing stocks in the stock market, like everything just, you know everything. They don’t necessarily have to be like triple-digit EPS and revenue growth, but everything is that say fifty percent like mid-high double-digit EPS. Revenue growth or higher, keep them in a watch list. The top say 50 ones, and just look for setups on those stocks, and you’re gonna outperform the market by a wide margin. Year after year, you don’t need to do any scans at all. You just keep track of that one watchlist with fifty stocks and just look for good setups on those among those. That’s all you need to do to get a big edge. Now you’re not gonna outperform like every market rally because in some markets cyclicals lead or beaten down stocks lead. But if you only trade the fastest growing stocks, you probably gonna do very well year after year after year. No rocket science involved; you don’t need any fancy indicators. You don’t need someone on TV to tell you this or that because you already know what works in the stock market.”

Lone

13,857 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Aaron Glenn on his philosophy (you're gonna like this 😤): #Jets "Our philosophy is we play with maximum effort, & there's 3 elements of effort: burst, speed, & finish. If I don't see one of those, you just went against our standard. If I don't see all 3 of them, you're a traitor, go play for somebody else. The next one is violence, we want to bring that back, cause the NFL has brought that out of the game, but we're gonna bring that back the right way. We understand the rules. You can be violent in this game still, even with the rules. Last we want to take the ball away. I'm talking about punching the ball out, I'm talking about INTs. When you put all those together, man that's an ass kicker to me, & that's what we try to be on the field. At the end of the day, you're gonna know you were in a fight. That's an ass kicker." 🎥 Pivot Podcast Optimistic Jets
1:39

Aaron Glenn on his philosophy (you're gonna like this 😤): #Jets "Our philosophy is we play with maximum effort, & there's 3 elements of effort: burst, speed, & finish. If I don't see one of those, you just went against our standard. If I don't see all 3 of them, you're a traitor, go play for somebody else. The next one is violence, we want to bring that back, cause the NFL has brought that out of the game, but we're gonna bring that back the right way. We understand the rules. You can be violent in this game still, even with the rules. Last we want to take the ball away. I'm talking about punching the ball out, I'm talking about INTs. When you put all those together, man that's an ass kicker to me, & that's what we try to be on the field. At the end of the day, you're gonna know you were in a fight. That's an ass kicker." 🎥 Pivot Podcast Optimistic Jets

Harrison Glaser

381,011 просмотров • 1 год назад