Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

theres a guy who hit platinum 3 playing two accounts at the same time hands on draven. feet on yuumi his FEET are higher ranked than 80% of the league population let that sink in for a second while you're hardstuck silver blaming your support for missing hooks this...

SaskioLoL's profile picture

Tony Chau

14,940 subscribers

405,474 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Gaming
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

watched a guy flexing his 80% WR on Draven with a Lulu support. "look at this winrate bro, i'm cracked" he's not cracked. he's carried. here's the uncomfortable truth about e-dating in League: the FAKE couples are running Draven/Lulu or Twitch/Yuumi. the REAL ones are running Xayah/Rakan. and there's a massive skill gap between the two. DRAVEN + LULU (THE EASY COUPLE): ADC just Q's and auto attacks. Lulu does the rest. Draven gets caught? Lulu E and he's fine. Draven needs to kite? Lulu W speeds him up. Draven all-ins and int's? Lulu R makes him unkillable. this isn't synergy. this is life support. Draven doesn't have to position. doesn't have to know when to fight. doesn't have to respect cooldowns. because Lulu will bail him out. that 80% WR? it's not Draven being good. it's Lulu making a dogshit player look presentable. watch that Draven go solo queue: suddenly 48% WR. because without the mechanical babysitter, his actual gameplay is EXPOSED. XAYAH + RAKAN (THE REAL COUPLE): both players have to be GOOD. Xayah times her feathers. Rakan times his engage. they have to sync perfectly or both die. Rakan goes in alone? He's deleted in 0.5 seconds. Xayah doesn't follow? Rakan just inted the game. Xayah ults wrong? Rakan can't save her. Rakan W misses? The whole plan falls apart. this is actual coordination. this is actual partnership. there's zero room for one player to be carried. edaters that will never meet irl: "we run Draven/Lulu, 80% WR, we're unstoppable!" (one is smurfing, one is hardstuck, the matchup is just broken) life long couple: "we run Xayah/Rakan, 58% WR" (both players are actually cracked, both have to execute) the gap is VISIBLE with Xayah/Rakan. watched a "80% WR Draven" duo try to run Xayah/Rakan: suddenly they're 45% WR. why? because Lulu was hiding his terrible positioning. with Xayah/Rakan, there's no crutch. both players have to be GOOD. the Draven was getting kills because Lulu E gave him free trades. the Rakan has to actually know when to go in. has to actually time it. the Xayah has to know how to follow. has to position perfectly. no shields. no safety net. just skill. here's what separates real couples from fake ones: FAKE COUPLES: rely on one player's mechanics one person carries, one person scales for free if you remove the OP support, the ADC crumbles comfortable but FRAGILE REAL COUPLES: both players have to be good both have to execute or both fail climbing together actually means both are skilled same WR in duo AND solo queue (because they're actually good) coordinated but FLEXIBLE you almost never see 80% WR Draven/Lulu duos in Grandmaster. because at high elo, the mechanical support crutch gets EXPLOITED. enemies respect Xayah/Rakan coordination. enemies abuse Draven/Lulu by punishing the ADC's positioning (which Lulu usually covers up). here's the real flex: not 80% WR on Draven with support carrying you. that's easy. 58% WR on Xayah/Rakan where both of you have to be CRACKED. that means something. that means you didn't get carried. that means you had to actually coordinate. that means both of you are actually good. most e-daters won't do this because it's uncomfortable. it's easier to pick Twitch/Yuumi and coast. it's harder to pick Xayah/Rakan and actually prove you're both skilled. the real test of a relationship isn't how many shields you can spam. it's how perfectly you can coordinate when there's no safety net. Xayah/Rakan at 58% WR beats Draven/Lulu at 80% WR every single time. one is actual skill. one is a stat check that's being gamed. you know which one you and your duo actually are. study the saskio way
0:33

watched a guy flexing his 80% WR on Draven with a Lulu support. "look at this winrate bro, i'm cracked" he's not cracked. he's carried. here's the uncomfortable truth about e-dating in League: the FAKE couples are running Draven/Lulu or Twitch/Yuumi. the REAL ones are running Xayah/Rakan. and there's a massive skill gap between the two. DRAVEN + LULU (THE EASY COUPLE): ADC just Q's and auto attacks. Lulu does the rest. Draven gets caught? Lulu E and he's fine. Draven needs to kite? Lulu W speeds him up. Draven all-ins and int's? Lulu R makes him unkillable. this isn't synergy. this is life support. Draven doesn't have to position. doesn't have to know when to fight. doesn't have to respect cooldowns. because Lulu will bail him out. that 80% WR? it's not Draven being good. it's Lulu making a dogshit player look presentable. watch that Draven go solo queue: suddenly 48% WR. because without the mechanical babysitter, his actual gameplay is EXPOSED. XAYAH + RAKAN (THE REAL COUPLE): both players have to be GOOD. Xayah times her feathers. Rakan times his engage. they have to sync perfectly or both die. Rakan goes in alone? He's deleted in 0.5 seconds. Xayah doesn't follow? Rakan just inted the game. Xayah ults wrong? Rakan can't save her. Rakan W misses? The whole plan falls apart. this is actual coordination. this is actual partnership. there's zero room for one player to be carried. edaters that will never meet irl: "we run Draven/Lulu, 80% WR, we're unstoppable!" (one is smurfing, one is hardstuck, the matchup is just broken) life long couple: "we run Xayah/Rakan, 58% WR" (both players are actually cracked, both have to execute) the gap is VISIBLE with Xayah/Rakan. watched a "80% WR Draven" duo try to run Xayah/Rakan: suddenly they're 45% WR. why? because Lulu was hiding his terrible positioning. with Xayah/Rakan, there's no crutch. both players have to be GOOD. the Draven was getting kills because Lulu E gave him free trades. the Rakan has to actually know when to go in. has to actually time it. the Xayah has to know how to follow. has to position perfectly. no shields. no safety net. just skill. here's what separates real couples from fake ones: FAKE COUPLES: rely on one player's mechanics one person carries, one person scales for free if you remove the OP support, the ADC crumbles comfortable but FRAGILE REAL COUPLES: both players have to be good both have to execute or both fail climbing together actually means both are skilled same WR in duo AND solo queue (because they're actually good) coordinated but FLEXIBLE you almost never see 80% WR Draven/Lulu duos in Grandmaster. because at high elo, the mechanical support crutch gets EXPLOITED. enemies respect Xayah/Rakan coordination. enemies abuse Draven/Lulu by punishing the ADC's positioning (which Lulu usually covers up). here's the real flex: not 80% WR on Draven with support carrying you. that's easy. 58% WR on Xayah/Rakan where both of you have to be CRACKED. that means something. that means you didn't get carried. that means you had to actually coordinate. that means both of you are actually good. most e-daters won't do this because it's uncomfortable. it's easier to pick Twitch/Yuumi and coast. it's harder to pick Xayah/Rakan and actually prove you're both skilled. the real test of a relationship isn't how many shields you can spam. it's how perfectly you can coordinate when there's no safety net. Xayah/Rakan at 58% WR beats Draven/Lulu at 80% WR every single time. one is actual skill. one is a stat check that's being gamed. you know which one you and your duo actually are. study the saskio way

Tony Chau

124,005 views • 10 months ago

🗣️ Eberechi Eze on Bukayo Saka: "He's an incredibly talented player, and his level of understanding of the game is insane, I feel like he's a player who makes the right decision a lot of the time, and he's so effective, so efficient. "I enjoy playing with him a lot, because you always know what you're going to get from him, you can always link up with him and he's a fun player to play with. "I'd say his decision-making is just experience and his learning growing up. I feel like that's something that he's probably worked on from a young age, and when you're just seeing it now, we see it in the high stage. "It's definitely a difficult skill to cultivate, so he is a special player."
1:26

🗣️ Eberechi Eze on Bukayo Saka: "He's an incredibly talented player, and his level of understanding of the game is insane, I feel like he's a player who makes the right decision a lot of the time, and he's so effective, so efficient. "I enjoy playing with him a lot, because you always know what you're going to get from him, you can always link up with him and he's a fun player to play with. "I'd say his decision-making is just experience and his learning growing up. I feel like that's something that he's probably worked on from a young age, and when you're just seeing it now, we see it in the high stage. "It's definitely a difficult skill to cultivate, so he is a special player."

Connor Humm

28,493 views • 3 months ago

Draymond Green says players should be required to stay in college for 2 years before entering the NBA “I don’t think there should be one-and-done. I think what you’re teaching kids with the one-and-done rule is to go to a place for five months, be one foot in, one foot out, and then go on your way” “You’re in college for two years, and you’re committed to something for two years. A team commits to you for two years. If you’re a first round pick, you get two guaranteed years, and then there’s team options. I think it aligns with the two year thing” “You’re making a two year commitment. They’re making a two year commitment to you. It familiarizes the college student with NBA rules right away when you talk about a two year commitment. What you can do, what you need to do over the course of two years” “I would change that. The one-and-done thing has never quite been right. You get people on a campus for five or six months, they’re one foot in, they’re one foot out. I just don’t think it’s a recipe for success”
1:06

Draymond Green says players should be required to stay in college for 2 years before entering the NBA “I don’t think there should be one-and-done. I think what you’re teaching kids with the one-and-done rule is to go to a place for five months, be one foot in, one foot out, and then go on your way” “You’re in college for two years, and you’re committed to something for two years. A team commits to you for two years. If you’re a first round pick, you get two guaranteed years, and then there’s team options. I think it aligns with the two year thing” “You’re making a two year commitment. They’re making a two year commitment to you. It familiarizes the college student with NBA rules right away when you talk about a two year commitment. What you can do, what you need to do over the course of two years” “I would change that. The one-and-done thing has never quite been right. You get people on a campus for five or six months, they’re one foot in, they’re one foot out. I just don’t think it’s a recipe for success”

dank

37,741 views • 1 month ago

you're not hardstuck in League because you lack skill. you're hardstuck because you haven't given yourself permission to win. the ladder isn't climbed by "talented" players. it's climbed by AUDACIOUS CRAZY mfs. here's what nobody's telling you: the guy who hit Challenger? his mechanics weren't 10x yours. his BELIEF was. the one-trick who solo-carries hardstuck teammates? he wasn't smarter. he just had the balls to assume HE was the win condition. the support who created plays out of nothing? he wasn't more talented. he just believed he deserved to dictate the fight. you're sitting there "qualified" and "skilled" waiting for permission to carry waiting for the "right time" to pop off waiting to feel "ready" to climb meanwhile someone worst is taking your LP. here's the truth: audacity beats talent 100% of the time. watched someone with zero macro understanding hit Diamond: the "talented" candidates: perfect CS every game ward every brush watched every guide play scared still 50% WR none of them climbed. the audacious one: mid CS, mid warding decent mechanics played like he was ALREADY Grandmaster walked into fights expecting to win hit Diamond in 200 games what's the difference? talent asks "am i good enough?" audacity says "i'm the win condition" skill waits for jungle ganks audacity creates its own pressure experience wants validation audacity assumes authority here's how you develop audacity in League: stop asking "can i carry this?" start saying "i'm carrying this" stop asking "should i all-in?" start all-inning stop asking "am i ready for this rank?" start playing like you're already there stop waiting for conditions: better teammates aren't coming better patches aren't coming perfect meta isn't coming just start playing like you already HAVE THEM. watched someone with 30% win rate on his main champ still climb: hardstuck player: "i only have 50% WR because my team doesn't set me up" audacious player: "i have 70% WR because i don't NEED them to set me up" same matchups. different audacity level. here's the uncomfortable part: you know exactly what you need to do to climb. farm better. position better. micro better. you don't do it because you're waiting for permission. permission from the universe ("am i allowed to do this?") permission from the meta ("is my champ viable?") permission from your doubt ("am i actually good enough?") meanwhile the audacious crazy fucker is doing it WITHOUT permission. the only difference between you and the player living your dream rank: hesitation. you hesitate to take the kill because "maybe the jungler wants it" you hesitate to engage because "maybe i should wait" you hesitate to split push because "maybe the team needs me" he doesn't hesitate. he TAKES. and guess what? when you take with audacity, your team follows because suddenly you're a threat. when he engages with confidence, it works because enemies respect the audacity. when he split pushes like he owns the lane, the enemy can't stop it. audacity creates its own reality. you're not playing scared because you lack skill. you're playing scared because you haven't given yourself PERMISSION to be dangerous. stop asking yourself if you're good enough. you already are. stop waiting for the moment to feel ready. start playing like you already WON before the game loaded. that's the shift. that's the climb. that's the difference between hardstuck and unstoppable. the world rewards audacity stop being talented and start being audacious. study the saskio way
0:25

you're not hardstuck in League because you lack skill. you're hardstuck because you haven't given yourself permission to win. the ladder isn't climbed by "talented" players. it's climbed by AUDACIOUS CRAZY mfs. here's what nobody's telling you: the guy who hit Challenger? his mechanics weren't 10x yours. his BELIEF was. the one-trick who solo-carries hardstuck teammates? he wasn't smarter. he just had the balls to assume HE was the win condition. the support who created plays out of nothing? he wasn't more talented. he just believed he deserved to dictate the fight. you're sitting there "qualified" and "skilled" waiting for permission to carry waiting for the "right time" to pop off waiting to feel "ready" to climb meanwhile someone worst is taking your LP. here's the truth: audacity beats talent 100% of the time. watched someone with zero macro understanding hit Diamond: the "talented" candidates: perfect CS every game ward every brush watched every guide play scared still 50% WR none of them climbed. the audacious one: mid CS, mid warding decent mechanics played like he was ALREADY Grandmaster walked into fights expecting to win hit Diamond in 200 games what's the difference? talent asks "am i good enough?" audacity says "i'm the win condition" skill waits for jungle ganks audacity creates its own pressure experience wants validation audacity assumes authority here's how you develop audacity in League: stop asking "can i carry this?" start saying "i'm carrying this" stop asking "should i all-in?" start all-inning stop asking "am i ready for this rank?" start playing like you're already there stop waiting for conditions: better teammates aren't coming better patches aren't coming perfect meta isn't coming just start playing like you already HAVE THEM. watched someone with 30% win rate on his main champ still climb: hardstuck player: "i only have 50% WR because my team doesn't set me up" audacious player: "i have 70% WR because i don't NEED them to set me up" same matchups. different audacity level. here's the uncomfortable part: you know exactly what you need to do to climb. farm better. position better. micro better. you don't do it because you're waiting for permission. permission from the universe ("am i allowed to do this?") permission from the meta ("is my champ viable?") permission from your doubt ("am i actually good enough?") meanwhile the audacious crazy fucker is doing it WITHOUT permission. the only difference between you and the player living your dream rank: hesitation. you hesitate to take the kill because "maybe the jungler wants it" you hesitate to engage because "maybe i should wait" you hesitate to split push because "maybe the team needs me" he doesn't hesitate. he TAKES. and guess what? when you take with audacity, your team follows because suddenly you're a threat. when he engages with confidence, it works because enemies respect the audacity. when he split pushes like he owns the lane, the enemy can't stop it. audacity creates its own reality. you're not playing scared because you lack skill. you're playing scared because you haven't given yourself PERMISSION to be dangerous. stop asking yourself if you're good enough. you already are. stop waiting for the moment to feel ready. start playing like you already WON before the game loaded. that's the shift. that's the climb. that's the difference between hardstuck and unstoppable. the world rewards audacity stop being talented and start being audacious. study the saskio way

Tony Chau

101,236 views • 10 months ago

🚨💰🇪🇺 #COST OF DOING BUSINESS — Justin Rose calls on Jon Rahm to pay his outstanding fines… “Yeah, listen, I would like to see Jon -- how many guys, eight? The other seven did it. So obviously eight did it and Jon didn't. So I mean, there's pretty decent precedent that the deal wasn't outrageous that they were proposing….” “But at the same time, I would like to see Jon pay his fines for sure and be a part of the Ryder Cup. For me, obviously playing on LIV was a decision that he made and wanted to make, and fair play to him for making it and good for him….” “He's playing good golf out there. He's winning. He's making a lot of money, and he's - you know, you can't argue, can't knock what he's been able to achieve out there….” “So I would just see it as a cost of doing business for Jon. Like for me, being in the Ryder Cup is more than about money. What I would say, where he may have a point is the Tour making him play extra events. Maybe he has a point there.” “So maybe there's some middle ground where he would do his best to support the Tour as and when, but not necessarily have that hung over his head, but paying his fines is obviously step No. 1.”
1:02

🚨💰🇪🇺 #COST OF DOING BUSINESS — Justin Rose calls on Jon Rahm to pay his outstanding fines… “Yeah, listen, I would like to see Jon -- how many guys, eight? The other seven did it. So obviously eight did it and Jon didn't. So I mean, there's pretty decent precedent that the deal wasn't outrageous that they were proposing….” “But at the same time, I would like to see Jon pay his fines for sure and be a part of the Ryder Cup. For me, obviously playing on LIV was a decision that he made and wanted to make, and fair play to him for making it and good for him….” “He's playing good golf out there. He's winning. He's making a lot of money, and he's - you know, you can't argue, can't knock what he's been able to achieve out there….” “So I would just see it as a cost of doing business for Jon. Like for me, being in the Ryder Cup is more than about money. What I would say, where he may have a point is the Tour making him play extra events. Maybe he has a point there.” “So maybe there's some middle ground where he would do his best to support the Tour as and when, but not necessarily have that hung over his head, but paying his fines is obviously step No. 1.”

NUCLR GOLF

404,369 views • 6 months ago

ALERT: Father loses part of his leg while saving his 2-year-old daughter from getting hit by a car in California. Jordan Stannard, 38, was putting his daughter, Sadie, into the family's car when he saw a car speeding toward the vehicle in Venice. "I literally just threw her (Sadie) into the car… I remember the truck fully hitting my body and hitting me and twisting me around." The crash severely damaged Stannard's left foot, with Stannard describing it as if he stepped on a “bomb.” Doctors had to amputate part of his leg below his knee and changed his once active life, which included running marathons and playing with his daughter. "If you told me, 'You just have to trade your foot to be with your daughters for the rest of your life,' that's a trade that I would make all day long." Stannard said his goal is to rehabilitate and run next year’s Los Angeles Marathon.
1:41

ALERT: Father loses part of his leg while saving his 2-year-old daughter from getting hit by a car in California. Jordan Stannard, 38, was putting his daughter, Sadie, into the family's car when he saw a car speeding toward the vehicle in Venice. "I literally just threw her (Sadie) into the car… I remember the truck fully hitting my body and hitting me and twisting me around." The crash severely damaged Stannard's left foot, with Stannard describing it as if he stepped on a “bomb.” Doctors had to amputate part of his leg below his knee and changed his once active life, which included running marathons and playing with his daughter. "If you told me, 'You just have to trade your foot to be with your daughters for the rest of your life,' that's a trade that I would make all day long." Stannard said his goal is to rehabilitate and run next year’s Los Angeles Marathon.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

367,193 views • 2 months ago

Warren Buffett's 3 rules for success: When asked for his top advice, Buffett doesn't mention stock picks or valuation models. He starts with something simple: "By far the best investment you can make is in yourself." His first rule? Learn to communicate. "If they just learn to communicate better, both in writing and in person, they increase their value at least 50%." "If you can't communicate, it's like winking at a girl in the dark. Nothing happens." His second rule is about protecting your mind and body. Imagine you're given one car for life. You'd fix every scratch and maintain it perfectly. "You get exactly one mind and one body in this world, and you can't start taking care of it when you're 50." His third rule: Choose who you surround yourself with. "You want to associate with people that are better than you are. You'll go in the direction of the people that you associate with." And the most important choice? Your spouse. "You want to pick a spouse that's better than you are, and hope they don't figure it out too fast." Three simple rules from one of the greatest investors alive.
2:41

Warren Buffett's 3 rules for success: When asked for his top advice, Buffett doesn't mention stock picks or valuation models. He starts with something simple: "By far the best investment you can make is in yourself." His first rule? Learn to communicate. "If they just learn to communicate better, both in writing and in person, they increase their value at least 50%." "If you can't communicate, it's like winking at a girl in the dark. Nothing happens." His second rule is about protecting your mind and body. Imagine you're given one car for life. You'd fix every scratch and maintain it perfectly. "You get exactly one mind and one body in this world, and you can't start taking care of it when you're 50." His third rule: Choose who you surround yourself with. "You want to associate with people that are better than you are. You'll go in the direction of the people that you associate with." And the most important choice? Your spouse. "You want to pick a spouse that's better than you are, and hope they don't figure it out too fast." Three simple rules from one of the greatest investors alive.

Black Edge

22,196 views • 5 months ago

Warren Buffett's 3 rules for success: When asked for his top advice, Buffett doesn't mention stock picks or valuation models. He starts with something simple: "By far the best investment you can make is in yourself." His first rule? Learn to communicate. "If they just learn to communicate better, both in writing and in person, they increase their value at least 50%." "If you can't communicate, it's like winking at a girl in the dark. Nothing happens." His second rule is about protecting your mind and body. Imagine you're given one car for life. You'd fix every scratch and maintain it perfectly. "You get exactly one mind and one body in this world, and you can't start taking care of it when you're 50." His third rule: Choose who you surround yourself with. "You want to associate with people that are better than you are. You'll go in the direction of the people that you associate with." And the most important choice? Your spouse. "You want to pick a spouse that's better than you are, and hope they don't figure it out too fast." Three simple rules from one of the greatest investors alive.
2:41

Warren Buffett's 3 rules for success: When asked for his top advice, Buffett doesn't mention stock picks or valuation models. He starts with something simple: "By far the best investment you can make is in yourself." His first rule? Learn to communicate. "If they just learn to communicate better, both in writing and in person, they increase their value at least 50%." "If you can't communicate, it's like winking at a girl in the dark. Nothing happens." His second rule is about protecting your mind and body. Imagine you're given one car for life. You'd fix every scratch and maintain it perfectly. "You get exactly one mind and one body in this world, and you can't start taking care of it when you're 50." His third rule: Choose who you surround yourself with. "You want to associate with people that are better than you are. You'll go in the direction of the people that you associate with." And the most important choice? Your spouse. "You want to pick a spouse that's better than you are, and hope they don't figure it out too fast." Three simple rules from one of the greatest investors alive.

Black Edge

24,111 views • 3 months ago

Melody phone call: "And you're all mad at Barrett because he was your Day 2 fucking alliance. Bro you turned on two of the people that were you were trying to work with, like you're so mad because somebody actually did what you did to you. It's actually fucking hilarious. [...] And you look ugly as hell, with your ugly ass slippers on...I am going insane. If it hasn't been clear for the last few weeks, this week is going to remain in my brain for the rest of my life. I genuinely have hit a point where I think I'm actually for real going crazy. Oh my god dude I need to see all of these Icons out by literally tomorrow. And Dee putting her foot on the fucking couch, the fuck are you even doing bro." #BB28 #BBBitez
1:22

Melody phone call: "And you're all mad at Barrett because he was your Day 2 fucking alliance. Bro you turned on two of the people that were you were trying to work with, like you're so mad because somebody actually did what you did to you. It's actually fucking hilarious. [...] And you look ugly as hell, with your ugly ass slippers on...I am going insane. If it hasn't been clear for the last few weeks, this week is going to remain in my brain for the rest of my life. I genuinely have hit a point where I think I'm actually for real going crazy. Oh my god dude I need to see all of these Icons out by literally tomorrow. And Dee putting her foot on the fucking couch, the fuck are you even doing bro." #BB28 #BBBitez

Big Brother Bitez 🔊

27,858 views • 17 days ago

Caller : “My New Husband Won’t Let Me Support My Kids” Caller : I was a single mom with two boys before I remarried. Um as a single mom, I was scared to lose my kids to the streets. So I made them a promise and told them that if they went to college full-time, I would financially take care of them while they completed school. So, they kept their end of the deal. and I wanted to, as a mom, to keep my end of the deal. Problem is, I got remarried, and my husband is completely against me helping them financially. They're 24 and 21. One has one semester left at at TCU. The next one has a year left at UCLA. Dave Ramsey: So you've supported them all this time? Caller : I have. Dave Ramsey: Okay, good. And he doesn't And they're almost done, and he's he's objecting to you finishing the support? Caller : He will not contribute financially to our family because he's upset that I contribute towards my children. But just main point that I was calling about was, I don't ask him for anything. He's never had to contribute anything towards their school, towards any of their expenses. But his frame of thinking is: "I'm not going to contribute to the family if you're contributing to your children that are already over 20. But I told him, "I made this promise, and I just really want to finish it for them." So he's like, "It's it's the kids, or our marriage." he just moved out a few months ago, I'm just literally torn because I don't know what to do Caller : So am I wrong? Am I wrong for what I'm doing? Dave Ramsey: you're not wrong. Caller : And he tells me all the time, because I'm a Christian woman, and he tells me this all the time: "You're Christian, and you need to submit to your husband, and if I don't approve of it, you need to respect..." Dave Ramsey: let me help you with this, okay? If your husband's doing cocaine and wants you to pay for it, and he says you're supposed to submit to me, then that's not what the Bible's talking about. let me just tell you, I don't think this is going to go well with what you've described. I think you're on the path of your marriage ending. it is NOT because you supported your children, Your marriage is ending because it was not built on mutual respect and agreement. Your marriage is ending because you had made a deal prior to getting married, he knew about that deal, and then after getting married was not okay with it and tried to change it And punish you for it.
3:26

Caller : “My New Husband Won’t Let Me Support My Kids” Caller : I was a single mom with two boys before I remarried. Um as a single mom, I was scared to lose my kids to the streets. So I made them a promise and told them that if they went to college full-time, I would financially take care of them while they completed school. So, they kept their end of the deal. and I wanted to, as a mom, to keep my end of the deal. Problem is, I got remarried, and my husband is completely against me helping them financially. They're 24 and 21. One has one semester left at at TCU. The next one has a year left at UCLA. Dave Ramsey: So you've supported them all this time? Caller : I have. Dave Ramsey: Okay, good. And he doesn't And they're almost done, and he's he's objecting to you finishing the support? Caller : He will not contribute financially to our family because he's upset that I contribute towards my children. But just main point that I was calling about was, I don't ask him for anything. He's never had to contribute anything towards their school, towards any of their expenses. But his frame of thinking is: "I'm not going to contribute to the family if you're contributing to your children that are already over 20. But I told him, "I made this promise, and I just really want to finish it for them." So he's like, "It's it's the kids, or our marriage." he just moved out a few months ago, I'm just literally torn because I don't know what to do Caller : So am I wrong? Am I wrong for what I'm doing? Dave Ramsey: you're not wrong. Caller : And he tells me all the time, because I'm a Christian woman, and he tells me this all the time: "You're Christian, and you need to submit to your husband, and if I don't approve of it, you need to respect..." Dave Ramsey: let me help you with this, okay? If your husband's doing cocaine and wants you to pay for it, and he says you're supposed to submit to me, then that's not what the Bible's talking about. let me just tell you, I don't think this is going to go well with what you've described. I think you're on the path of your marriage ending. it is NOT because you supported your children, Your marriage is ending because it was not built on mutual respect and agreement. Your marriage is ending because you had made a deal prior to getting married, he knew about that deal, and then after getting married was not okay with it and tried to change it And punish you for it.

Jeff

14,782 views • 2 months ago

I cannot describe this man with the words that I have but I hope this live performance will give you the right words for him. Rory Gallagher performing 'Shadow Play' live at Montreux, Switzerland, 1979. He's seen as one of the most talented guitar players by the people who know him. Let's leave the talent aside, let's talk his love of playing music. Let's talk his humbleness. Let's talk his amazing interaction with the audience. Let's talk his unstoppable energy on the stage. Then we can talk his talent because the music you listen to should come from the bottom of the heart. The ones we spend time listening to produced music with their life experiences. Rory is another one of them and he is criminally underrated. Life didn't let Rory to be with us in this time but his legacy will always be lived here in this world by people like me and you. If any of you didn't have a chance to listen to his playing and music, come on, you're missing so much. #RoryGallagher #ShadowPlay
9:59

I cannot describe this man with the words that I have but I hope this live performance will give you the right words for him. Rory Gallagher performing 'Shadow Play' live at Montreux, Switzerland, 1979. He's seen as one of the most talented guitar players by the people who know him. Let's leave the talent aside, let's talk his love of playing music. Let's talk his humbleness. Let's talk his amazing interaction with the audience. Let's talk his unstoppable energy on the stage. Then we can talk his talent because the music you listen to should come from the bottom of the heart. The ones we spend time listening to produced music with their life experiences. Rory is another one of them and he is criminally underrated. Life didn't let Rory to be with us in this time but his legacy will always be lived here in this world by people like me and you. If any of you didn't have a chance to listen to his playing and music, come on, you're missing so much. #RoryGallagher #ShadowPlay

Rock'n Roll of All

27,107 views • 2 years ago

Asmongold explains his position on war and calls international law a fantasy "I agree with using whatever is required to defeat your enemy to the extent that your enemy seeks your destruction. Whether that's blowing up residential buildings or bombing cars, you do everything you can to ensure the survival of your people." "Who decides if it's a war crime? Something you're not accountable to? You're not one of the international law believers, are you? You don't really have this fantasy that there's a gentleman's agreement you can make with a terrorist state." "The only currency international law is backed by is lead. If you can't enforce it, you can't do it. That's all there is to it."
1:15

Asmongold explains his position on war and calls international law a fantasy "I agree with using whatever is required to defeat your enemy to the extent that your enemy seeks your destruction. Whether that's blowing up residential buildings or bombing cars, you do everything you can to ensure the survival of your people." "Who decides if it's a war crime? Something you're not accountable to? You're not one of the international law believers, are you? You don't really have this fantasy that there's a gentleman's agreement you can make with a terrorist state." "The only currency international law is backed by is lead. If you can't enforce it, you can't do it. That's all there is to it."

Asmongold Updates

14,464 views • 2 months ago

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."
1:51

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

374,056 views • 6 months ago

🚨NEW: Chris Cuomo responds to Elon Musk: "I know there's power in playing the victim — but Elon Musk is the one saying that 'The Left is the party of murder.'" "And that is as useless as his platform when it comes to pushing extremism at a time when we need to do the opposite." "And I know it makes you money. And I know it makes you resonant — but it's also why you're no longer standing next to the president." "And I would never want anything bad to happen to him because I think he has bad ideas." "Elon Musk can be part of a better social media. He should change his algorithms."
0:57

🚨NEW: Chris Cuomo responds to Elon Musk: "I know there's power in playing the victim — but Elon Musk is the one saying that 'The Left is the party of murder.'" "And that is as useless as his platform when it comes to pushing extremism at a time when we need to do the opposite." "And I know it makes you money. And I know it makes you resonant — but it's also why you're no longer standing next to the president." "And I would never want anything bad to happen to him because I think he has bad ideas." "Elon Musk can be part of a better social media. He should change his algorithms."

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

1,066,733 views • 1 year ago

HSTikkyTokky WENT OFF on Piers Morgan and his wife after getting DISRESPECTED during the interview 😳 "You make yourself look bad every single day, when your wife is at home posting pictures that you're out. Is that why you have a problem with me? Is that why you're pushing your narratives?" "Do you know what? Here's what I think about you... I watched the documentary and I think you're stupid. I think you're the one who got EXPOSED in a global way by Netflix, by Louis Theroux for what you are." "I don't care about your silly words... what I said is fact, I have a picture of it. I can flip it around and show you right now that I couldn't care less about your silly little words." "All right, let's just end this. Let's end this please, I'm not doing this. Sorry, guys it's pointless."
1:36

HSTikkyTokky WENT OFF on Piers Morgan and his wife after getting DISRESPECTED during the interview 😳 "You make yourself look bad every single day, when your wife is at home posting pictures that you're out. Is that why you have a problem with me? Is that why you're pushing your narratives?" "Do you know what? Here's what I think about you... I watched the documentary and I think you're stupid. I think you're the one who got EXPOSED in a global way by Netflix, by Louis Theroux for what you are." "I don't care about your silly words... what I said is fact, I have a picture of it. I can flip it around and show you right now that I couldn't care less about your silly little words." "All right, let's just end this. Let's end this please, I'm not doing this. Sorry, guys it's pointless."

midaqih

76,327 views • 6 months ago

🗣️ Jeff Peterson: "There is one person I want to shout out specifically, and that's Pat Connaughton. I'll be fully transparent with you guys. When we made the trade for Pat, I talked to him and I said, 'you're probably not making the team.'" "And I give him all the credit in the world because he showed up. He didn't have to be here. He could have just said, 'I'm just gonna chill in Texas with my family and figure out my next move,' but he's been with you guys every step of the way, competing." "He and Charles have had conversations. I've had conversations with him. He knows that if he plays 5 minutes or if he may not play for 20 straight games, why he's on this team is because he's about everything that we're about: Hornets DNA." "You talk about controlling controllables. Anytime his name is called, he's ready to go in the game. He's staying ready. He's busting his ass. He's a professional. So if there's any doubt at any time of what we're about, look at what he did. Because it was all in his control, in terms of his attitude, his approach, showing up every day doing what he could control, and obviously it paid off."
1:05

🗣️ Jeff Peterson: "There is one person I want to shout out specifically, and that's Pat Connaughton. I'll be fully transparent with you guys. When we made the trade for Pat, I talked to him and I said, 'you're probably not making the team.'" "And I give him all the credit in the world because he showed up. He didn't have to be here. He could have just said, 'I'm just gonna chill in Texas with my family and figure out my next move,' but he's been with you guys every step of the way, competing." "He and Charles have had conversations. I've had conversations with him. He knows that if he plays 5 minutes or if he may not play for 20 straight games, why he's on this team is because he's about everything that we're about: Hornets DNA." "You talk about controlling controllables. Anytime his name is called, he's ready to go in the game. He's staying ready. He's busting his ass. He's a professional. So if there's any doubt at any time of what we're about, look at what he did. Because it was all in his control, in terms of his attitude, his approach, showing up every day doing what he could control, and obviously it paid off."

r/CharlotteHornets

440,477 views • 11 months ago

Tales of Wudan - The Mysterious Old Man In the year 644, as a young student of the Wudan style, it was my job to sweep the training area each morning. ‍ I started this job at 3:45am - and, with vigor, would finish with a few minutes to spare before the 6am training. ‍ There was an old man with no hands and no feet - the only man, to whom Master Po would bow - who would sit atop a tree trunk and watch me complete this task. ‍ Every morning, he appeared and watched in admiration. It was a full 219 years, before I mustered the courage to speak with him. “Why do you watch me sweep?” I asked, puzzled. ‍ “Ah, young Cobra, what better unison of the hands and the feet than sweeping a floor? If you were in my position, you would savour the task!” he replied. ‍ I looked at the stumps where his hands and feet once were, then looked up at him. He knew what I wanted to ask... But I was afraid to appear disrespectful. ‍ Truly, it was none of my business. Curiosity got the better of me. “What happened to you?” I said, looking towards the ground. ‍ I was sure he was contemplating reprimanding me. I was pleased, when he began to speak. ‍ “Wudan was not always such a peaceful place,” he began. “Warring tribes fought for this mountains power and strange creatures lurked in every corner. Before myself and a few brave others, including Master Po, banished them from the mountain.” ‍ I placed my broom on the floor, sat down and continued to listen. ‍ “While fighting bandits near the Yushu river, a water snake grabbed my right foot and began to pull me under. Fearing for my life, and unable to see the snake through the bloodied water, I removed my right foot with one slice of my sword. The only alternative was to drown.” ‍ Still looking down, I raised my eyes to take a glimpse at his right stump. “What about your left foot?” I asked. ‍ He placed his right leg under his robe and exposed his left before continuing his story. ‍ “The next day, I was limping and slowing the group down. I asked to be left to die, but Po demanded that I fight. Soon, a daughter of a previously slain bandit had spotted us and fired an arrow from a ridge which landed squarely in my left foot. Fearing gangrene, I removed my left foot with one slice of my sword.” ‍ “What happened to your hands?” I asked quickly. ‍ “My left hand was snared by a Golden Dragon in that now empty cave you children enjoy, to avoid being pulled into darkness and killed. I removed my left hand with one slice of my sword...” ‍ He paused. “My right hand was caught in a bear trap the same afternoon, fearing death, I removed it with my teeth.” ‍ I looked at his right hands stump. It was ragged. Not a clean cut like the others. It still looked painful. He looked relieved when the story was over, it pained him to relive the events. ‍ He took a sigh of relief and moved his gaze from me back over to the floor I was sweeping. I however was confused. ‍ “How did you find the strength, to remove limb after limb in such gruesome fashion? I don’t think I could do that.” ‍ He smiled. “Well then you would be dead. And you would never tell your story to anybody, would you? I didn’t find the strength to die.” ‍ I bowed and returned to sweeping. The conversation made me minutes late for training. Master Po beat me severely. ‍ The next morning when I rose to sweep, the man was not there. I never saw him again. ‍ Such is the way of Wudan.
4:47

Tales of Wudan - The Mysterious Old Man In the year 644, as a young student of the Wudan style, it was my job to sweep the training area each morning. ‍ I started this job at 3:45am - and, with vigor, would finish with a few minutes to spare before the 6am training. ‍ There was an old man with no hands and no feet - the only man, to whom Master Po would bow - who would sit atop a tree trunk and watch me complete this task. ‍ Every morning, he appeared and watched in admiration. It was a full 219 years, before I mustered the courage to speak with him. “Why do you watch me sweep?” I asked, puzzled. ‍ “Ah, young Cobra, what better unison of the hands and the feet than sweeping a floor? If you were in my position, you would savour the task!” he replied. ‍ I looked at the stumps where his hands and feet once were, then looked up at him. He knew what I wanted to ask... But I was afraid to appear disrespectful. ‍ Truly, it was none of my business. Curiosity got the better of me. “What happened to you?” I said, looking towards the ground. ‍ I was sure he was contemplating reprimanding me. I was pleased, when he began to speak. ‍ “Wudan was not always such a peaceful place,” he began. “Warring tribes fought for this mountains power and strange creatures lurked in every corner. Before myself and a few brave others, including Master Po, banished them from the mountain.” ‍ I placed my broom on the floor, sat down and continued to listen. ‍ “While fighting bandits near the Yushu river, a water snake grabbed my right foot and began to pull me under. Fearing for my life, and unable to see the snake through the bloodied water, I removed my right foot with one slice of my sword. The only alternative was to drown.” ‍ Still looking down, I raised my eyes to take a glimpse at his right stump. “What about your left foot?” I asked. ‍ He placed his right leg under his robe and exposed his left before continuing his story. ‍ “The next day, I was limping and slowing the group down. I asked to be left to die, but Po demanded that I fight. Soon, a daughter of a previously slain bandit had spotted us and fired an arrow from a ridge which landed squarely in my left foot. Fearing gangrene, I removed my left foot with one slice of my sword.” ‍ “What happened to your hands?” I asked quickly. ‍ “My left hand was snared by a Golden Dragon in that now empty cave you children enjoy, to avoid being pulled into darkness and killed. I removed my left hand with one slice of my sword...” ‍ He paused. “My right hand was caught in a bear trap the same afternoon, fearing death, I removed it with my teeth.” ‍ I looked at his right hands stump. It was ragged. Not a clean cut like the others. It still looked painful. He looked relieved when the story was over, it pained him to relive the events. ‍ He took a sigh of relief and moved his gaze from me back over to the floor I was sweeping. I however was confused. ‍ “How did you find the strength, to remove limb after limb in such gruesome fashion? I don’t think I could do that.” ‍ He smiled. “Well then you would be dead. And you would never tell your story to anybody, would you? I didn’t find the strength to die.” ‍ I bowed and returned to sweeping. The conversation made me minutes late for training. Master Po beat me severely. ‍ The next morning when I rose to sweep, the man was not there. I never saw him again. ‍ Such is the way of Wudan.

Tales of Wudan

19,298 views • 2 years ago

Positivity Rant: I was in Cabo with this guy who had just sold his company for $900M. He offered me a trade: "Let's swap lives." I'd get his private jet, his house in Cabo, and his billionaire status. He'd get to be me - 27, with his whole life ahead of him, & another chance to play the game of life. I realized I had it better. It made me realize 2 things that changed my life: 1) If you're young, you have the most valuable thing of all: your whole life ahead of you. You still get to play the game. 2) Life is all a big game. Imagine if someone life swapped with you...how would they be playing your character better than you are? What would they be doing differently? How much more fun would they be having? This was hands down one of the best thoughts I've ever had. I discuss:
5:25

Positivity Rant: I was in Cabo with this guy who had just sold his company for $900M. He offered me a trade: "Let's swap lives." I'd get his private jet, his house in Cabo, and his billionaire status. He'd get to be me - 27, with his whole life ahead of him, & another chance to play the game of life. I realized I had it better. It made me realize 2 things that changed my life: 1) If you're young, you have the most valuable thing of all: your whole life ahead of you. You still get to play the game. 2) Life is all a big game. Imagine if someone life swapped with you...how would they be playing your character better than you are? What would they be doing differently? How much more fun would they be having? This was hands down one of the best thoughts I've ever had. I discuss:

Cole Jaczko

894,285 views • 5 months ago

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on why most leaders fail at meritocracy: "One of the tough things about management is you have to get rid of the bad people." Dimon argues that leaders often talk about meritocracy but fail to act on it. Execution is the problem, not philosophy. "Very often you have people who are unwilling to get rid of the bad people. Bad could be because their culture is bad. It also could be because they're not good enough." He points to the difference between business and sports: "In sport, if you're not batting 250, you're not going to be playing second base. You take out a pitcher who's not doing a good job. In business, they're left in those jobs for a long time." Dimon recalls being challenged early in his career after demoting a long-tenured employee named Joe. Someone asked: "How can I be loyal to you when you weren't loyal to Joe?" He couldn't answer in the moment. But the next day, he called back: "You got it backwards. If I was loyal to Joe and kept him in the job and most people thought he just wasn't doing a good job anymore, who am I being disloyal to? Everybody else and the customer." His advice: "You have to be very careful in management about why you're doing and what you're doing..." Keeping the wrong people in place is the fastest way to lose the right ones.
1:51

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on why most leaders fail at meritocracy: "One of the tough things about management is you have to get rid of the bad people." Dimon argues that leaders often talk about meritocracy but fail to act on it. Execution is the problem, not philosophy. "Very often you have people who are unwilling to get rid of the bad people. Bad could be because their culture is bad. It also could be because they're not good enough." He points to the difference between business and sports: "In sport, if you're not batting 250, you're not going to be playing second base. You take out a pitcher who's not doing a good job. In business, they're left in those jobs for a long time." Dimon recalls being challenged early in his career after demoting a long-tenured employee named Joe. Someone asked: "How can I be loyal to you when you weren't loyal to Joe?" He couldn't answer in the moment. But the next day, he called back: "You got it backwards. If I was loyal to Joe and kept him in the job and most people thought he just wasn't doing a good job anymore, who am I being disloyal to? Everybody else and the customer." His advice: "You have to be very careful in management about why you're doing and what you're doing..." Keeping the wrong people in place is the fastest way to lose the right ones.

Big Brain Business

338,908 views • 7 months ago