Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

There’s been a rush to interpret recent comments by Iranian officials as an admission that Tehran is nearing its breaking point and urgently needs a deal. I think that reading misses what they are actually saying. The economic strain is clearly severe. Central Bank chief Abdolnaser Hemmati says oil...

SinaToossi's profile picture

Sina Toossi

41,904 subscribers

27,856 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Yorum

Kamran Sharizad profil fotoğrafı
Kamran Sharizad1 ay önce

I think that a very large country like Iran, with much prosperity and borders with many different countries, can continuously trade enough to keep Iran economically running

Azita profil fotoğrafı
Azita1 ay önce

Agreed. Araghchi seems to be one of the few making sense here—he understands the leverage game and knows economic pain doesn’t mean Tehran is just gonna roll over.

Moji Gilani profil fotoğrafı
Moji Gilani1 ay önce

@Rob_Malley There is almost zero chance that IRGC will open SoH through negotiations. Simply, the pressure of IR supporters are far more effective. They will be waiting till proximity of congress election to start military campaign so Trump can feel the pain. Trump advisors are not smart!

@ThouArtAlive profil fotoğrafı
@ThouArtAlive1 ay önce

When the hardliners pass a law to outlaw even talking about taking to US then Trump will get what Pezeshkian was talking about was: dealing with US when Trump gives up on bullying because hardliners don't like the idea, not giving in to the bullying.

pablo bartolome profil fotoğrafı
pablo bartolome1 ay önce

They are against the clock, Ormuz is leaky and next year more bypasses will be active, besides the situation in making billions to US O&G and will create problems to China, main Iran backer, clearly a winning strategy

Bart DePalma profil fotoğrafı
Bart DePalma1 ay önce

How long will the military rank and file defend this regime when their families are destitute and starving?

Benzer Videolar

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️ Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is signaling that Tehran is ready to end the war, arguing that Iran should seek an agreement now while, in his words, it remains in a “position of strength and dignity.” 🗣️ “It is better to end the war now, while we are in a position of strength and dignity,” Pezeshkian said. He claimed that “the entire world recognizes Iran’s victory” and accused the United States of violating international norms by striking Iranian schools, hospitals and infrastructure. “Because of this, America has become an object of hatred throughout the world,” he added. Pezeshkian’s rhetoric appears designed to frame a potential end to hostilities as a victory rather than a concession, an important distinction for Tehran domestically. After a costly confrontation, Iran’s leadership needs any negotiated exit to preserve deterrence and political credibility. The key question is whether Washington is prepared to offer terms Tehran can publicly present as an honorable settlement, particularly as the Trump administration simultaneously intensifies economic pressure. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:23

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️ Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is signaling that Tehran is ready to end the war, arguing that Iran should seek an agreement now while, in his words, it remains in a “position of strength and dignity.” 🗣️ “It is better to end the war now, while we are in a position of strength and dignity,” Pezeshkian said. He claimed that “the entire world recognizes Iran’s victory” and accused the United States of violating international norms by striking Iranian schools, hospitals and infrastructure. “Because of this, America has become an object of hatred throughout the world,” he added. Pezeshkian’s rhetoric appears designed to frame a potential end to hostilities as a victory rather than a concession, an important distinction for Tehran domestically. After a costly confrontation, Iran’s leadership needs any negotiated exit to preserve deterrence and political credibility. The key question is whether Washington is prepared to offer terms Tehran can publicly present as an honorable settlement, particularly as the Trump administration simultaneously intensifies economic pressure. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

31,329 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Donald Trump says Iran wants "very much to make a deal" to end the war but "so far they haven't got there" as the US is "not satisfied with it". He adds that Iran has "no choice" but to agree a deal given the economic difficulties Tehran is facing. Live:
1:58

Donald Trump says Iran wants "very much to make a deal" to end the war but "so far they haven't got there" as the US is "not satisfied with it". He adds that Iran has "no choice" but to agree a deal given the economic difficulties Tehran is facing. Live:

Sky News

76,795 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇮🇷 Iran Refuses to Surrender Uranium Stockpile: US-Iran negotiations are continuing, with the central demand that Tehran surrender its stockpile of enriched uranium. Iran is strongly resisting, viewing the handover as a humiliating capitulation to the United States and Israel that would undermine its security, damage its regional prestige, and threaten the regime’s survival. The stockpile also represents critical leverage against potential future attacks. As a result, Tehran is unlikely to give it up voluntarily. Only severe economic collapse is likely to force its hand. For now, the Trump administration is favoring sustained economic pressure over military escalation- blocking Iranian oil shipments and engaging in a prolonged war of endurance.
0:58

🇮🇷 Iran Refuses to Surrender Uranium Stockpile: US-Iran negotiations are continuing, with the central demand that Tehran surrender its stockpile of enriched uranium. Iran is strongly resisting, viewing the handover as a humiliating capitulation to the United States and Israel that would undermine its security, damage its regional prestige, and threaten the regime’s survival. The stockpile also represents critical leverage against potential future attacks. As a result, Tehran is unlikely to give it up voluntarily. Only severe economic collapse is likely to force its hand. For now, the Trump administration is favoring sustained economic pressure over military escalation- blocking Iranian oil shipments and engaging in a prolonged war of endurance.

Global Strategy

38,084 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran’s economy is under severe pressure. But Prof. Mohammad Marandi argues that economic pain does not necessarily mean Tehran will fold. He says Iran has endured prolonged economic warfare before, and that the U.S. is also exposed to the costs of a drawn-out conflict. “The Iranians are going to be resistant, resilient, and they’ll remain steadfast. It’ll be tough. But they know that this is a war for survival.” Seyed Mohammad Marandi
3:27

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran’s economy is under severe pressure. But Prof. Mohammad Marandi argues that economic pain does not necessarily mean Tehran will fold. He says Iran has endured prolonged economic warfare before, and that the U.S. is also exposed to the costs of a drawn-out conflict. “The Iranians are going to be resistant, resilient, and they’ll remain steadfast. It’ll be tough. But they know that this is a war for survival.” Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Mario Nawfal

96,389 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ Donald Trump is changing course on Iran, ordering his senior representatives to halt negotiations with Tehran as Washington prepares to replace stop-and-start diplomacy with a longer campaign of sustained economic and military pressure. According to CNN, the administration is simultaneously moving away from the idea of immediately launching another massive wave of strikes. Instead, Trump wants to gradually “strangle” Iran through economic isolation and sustained military pressure, steadily increasing the cost for Tehran while denying it the relief it seeks. The objective is to weaken Iran’s position over time until its leadership becomes more willing to accept Washington’s conditions. CNN had previously reported that the administration was preparing a broader “economic isolation” strategy against Iran. This represents a shift in method rather than a reduction in pressure. Washington appears to be betting that Iran can be forced into concessions without immediately committing the U.S. to another expensive round of large-scale warfare. The strategy gives Trump room to preserve military escalation as a later option while sanctions, the blockade and economic pressure steadily erode Tehran’s ability to sustain the confrontation. The crucial question is whether Iran bends first, or decides that renewed escalation is preferable to being slowly squeezed. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:21

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ Donald Trump is changing course on Iran, ordering his senior representatives to halt negotiations with Tehran as Washington prepares to replace stop-and-start diplomacy with a longer campaign of sustained economic and military pressure. According to CNN, the administration is simultaneously moving away from the idea of immediately launching another massive wave of strikes. Instead, Trump wants to gradually “strangle” Iran through economic isolation and sustained military pressure, steadily increasing the cost for Tehran while denying it the relief it seeks. The objective is to weaken Iran’s position over time until its leadership becomes more willing to accept Washington’s conditions. CNN had previously reported that the administration was preparing a broader “economic isolation” strategy against Iran. This represents a shift in method rather than a reduction in pressure. Washington appears to be betting that Iran can be forced into concessions without immediately committing the U.S. to another expensive round of large-scale warfare. The strategy gives Trump room to preserve military escalation as a later option while sanctions, the blockade and economic pressure steadily erode Tehran’s ability to sustain the confrontation. The crucial question is whether Iran bends first, or decides that renewed escalation is preferable to being slowly squeezed. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

13,610 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

My interview with Jim Sciutto CNN International: A. The fundamental question is: What is the administration’s endgame with Iran? Right now, that remains unclear. Is the objective to weaken Iran, bring down the regime, force Tehran to capitulate, or ultimately return to negotiations and reach an agreement? These are very different objectives that require very different strategies. Until Washington defines what success actually looks like, it is difficult to understand where this conflict is heading or how it is supposed to end. B. Economic pressure is a tool, not an objective, and certainly not an exit strategy. Without a realistic diplomatic off-ramp, maximum economic pressure is more likely to produce escalation than capitulation. The assumption that Washington can continue squeezing Tehran while indefinitely preserving the current status quo is simply unrealistic. Iran has agency in this conflict. Tehran will look for ways to impose costs on the United States and its regional partners. So even if the administration wants to freeze the conflict at its current level, Iran has no reason to accommodate that preference. Washington does not control the escalation ladder by itself. C. Meanwhile, much of the discussion in Washington is focused on the Strait of Hormu which, we should remember, was open before the war, while the strategic problems that helped produce this conflict remain unresolved. The most important is Iran’s nuclear program. In fact, the nuclear challenge may now be more dangerous than it was before the war. Ali Khamenei was deeply hostile to the United States and Israel, but he was also extremely cautious about crossing the nuclear threshold. His removal has changed the decision-making environment in Tehran. With the IRGC now wielding greater influence, the possibility that Iran could decide to move toward a nuclear weapon has become more serious. cannot build a strategy around the assumption that the Iranian regime will collapse. That is not a strategy; it is wishful thinking. Economic pressure, even severe economic pressure, does not guarantee regime change. In fact, it could produce the opposite effect: triggering a nationalist backlash, strengthening the regime’s narrative that Iran is under external attack, and giving the leadership additional justification to crack down internally. Regime change may happen, but Washington cannot make it the central assumption on which its Iran strategy rests. U.S. policy has to be built around the Iran that exists today, not the Iran Washington hopes might emerge tomorrow. E. For the nuclear thtrat - That creates an enormous problem for Israel. It is difficult to imagine any Israeli government simply accepting an Iranian nuclear program moving toward weaponization. So ending the current fighting without addressing the nuclear issue would not resolve the underlying conflict. It could leave Washington and Jerusalem facing an even more dangerous crisis down the road. #IranWar‌ #iran #thebrief
5:35

My interview with Jim Sciutto CNN International: A. The fundamental question is: What is the administration’s endgame with Iran? Right now, that remains unclear. Is the objective to weaken Iran, bring down the regime, force Tehran to capitulate, or ultimately return to negotiations and reach an agreement? These are very different objectives that require very different strategies. Until Washington defines what success actually looks like, it is difficult to understand where this conflict is heading or how it is supposed to end. B. Economic pressure is a tool, not an objective, and certainly not an exit strategy. Without a realistic diplomatic off-ramp, maximum economic pressure is more likely to produce escalation than capitulation. The assumption that Washington can continue squeezing Tehran while indefinitely preserving the current status quo is simply unrealistic. Iran has agency in this conflict. Tehran will look for ways to impose costs on the United States and its regional partners. So even if the administration wants to freeze the conflict at its current level, Iran has no reason to accommodate that preference. Washington does not control the escalation ladder by itself. C. Meanwhile, much of the discussion in Washington is focused on the Strait of Hormu which, we should remember, was open before the war, while the strategic problems that helped produce this conflict remain unresolved. The most important is Iran’s nuclear program. In fact, the nuclear challenge may now be more dangerous than it was before the war. Ali Khamenei was deeply hostile to the United States and Israel, but he was also extremely cautious about crossing the nuclear threshold. His removal has changed the decision-making environment in Tehran. With the IRGC now wielding greater influence, the possibility that Iran could decide to move toward a nuclear weapon has become more serious. cannot build a strategy around the assumption that the Iranian regime will collapse. That is not a strategy; it is wishful thinking. Economic pressure, even severe economic pressure, does not guarantee regime change. In fact, it could produce the opposite effect: triggering a nationalist backlash, strengthening the regime’s narrative that Iran is under external attack, and giving the leadership additional justification to crack down internally. Regime change may happen, but Washington cannot make it the central assumption on which its Iran strategy rests. U.S. policy has to be built around the Iran that exists today, not the Iran Washington hopes might emerge tomorrow. E. For the nuclear thtrat - That creates an enormous problem for Israel. It is difficult to imagine any Israeli government simply accepting an Iranian nuclear program moving toward weaponization. So ending the current fighting without addressing the nuclear issue would not resolve the underlying conflict. It could leave Washington and Jerusalem facing an even more dangerous crisis down the road. #IranWar‌ #iran #thebrief

Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش

15,414 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Prof. Mohammad Marandi: Iran isn’t interested in another deal. It’s waiting for America to honor the last one. Washington appears to be betting that economic pressure will eventually force Iran back to the negotiating table. Prof. Mohammad Marandi thinks that fundamentally misunderstands Tehran’s position. Iran, he says, believes the negotiation is already over. Trump signed an agreement. Tehran now expects Washington to implement it, and until that happens, Marandi says there will be no new negotiations. “We have a deal. You signed that piece of paper. Whenever you implement the deal, then come talking.” That creates a dangerous problem. The U.S. is continuing its economic siege while Iran has explicitly warned that if Washington succeeds in seriously damaging its economy, Tehran will respond militarily. Iran cannot sanction American banks or shut down the U.S. economy, Marandi argues, so its response would be against U.S. economic assets, or assets it considers linked to Washington, across the region. Then America faces pressure to retaliate. And the cycle starts again. Marandi says a larger war in the coming weeks or months is now a serious possibility, whether triggered by Iranian retaliation, a desperate U.S. escalation, or another Israeli attack that pulls Washington back in. The two sides aren't negotiating toward the same finish line anymore. Washington is waiting for Iran to concede. Iran, meanwhile, is waiting for Washington to concede first. Seyed Mohammad Marandi
46:13

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Prof. Mohammad Marandi: Iran isn’t interested in another deal. It’s waiting for America to honor the last one. Washington appears to be betting that economic pressure will eventually force Iran back to the negotiating table. Prof. Mohammad Marandi thinks that fundamentally misunderstands Tehran’s position. Iran, he says, believes the negotiation is already over. Trump signed an agreement. Tehran now expects Washington to implement it, and until that happens, Marandi says there will be no new negotiations. “We have a deal. You signed that piece of paper. Whenever you implement the deal, then come talking.” That creates a dangerous problem. The U.S. is continuing its economic siege while Iran has explicitly warned that if Washington succeeds in seriously damaging its economy, Tehran will respond militarily. Iran cannot sanction American banks or shut down the U.S. economy, Marandi argues, so its response would be against U.S. economic assets, or assets it considers linked to Washington, across the region. Then America faces pressure to retaliate. And the cycle starts again. Marandi says a larger war in the coming weeks or months is now a serious possibility, whether triggered by Iranian retaliation, a desperate U.S. escalation, or another Israeli attack that pulls Washington back in. The two sides aren't negotiating toward the same finish line anymore. Washington is waiting for Iran to concede. Iran, meanwhile, is waiting for Washington to concede first. Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Mario Nawfal

335,898 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

BIG | 🇺🇸🇮🇷‼️‼️ U.S. intelligence believes Tehran is settling in for a prolonged confrontation, increasingly confident that it can keep striking across the Middle East while using time, economic disruption and American political pressure as weapons against Washington. According to The New York Times, the conflict has given Iran a clearer understanding of its own military capabilities, while U.S. officials see few signs that Tehran is ready for serious negotiations or a comprehensive settlement. American assessments also warn that additional sanctions and economic pressure could intensify the already ongoing escalation in the short term. Tehran appears to believe that prolonging the confrontation can increase pressure on the Trump administration ahead of the November midterms, particularly through higher energy prices and growing war fatigue. Reuters reporting reinforces that concern: the conflict has already pushed oil prices sharply higher, while Trump’s approval remains at 33% and public support for the Iran war is weak. Tehran’s calculation is dangerous precisely because Trump’s strategy has not yet produced the decisive outcome Washington sought. Iran has been battered, but it has neither accepted a comprehensive settlement nor abandoned its ability to impose costs across the region, and the conflict is already in its seventh month. Simply applying more economic pressure while allowing the regime to dictate the tempo risks giving Tehran the prolonged contest it wants. Washington needs a clearer strategy that combines military pressure, economic isolation and political leverage to weaken the regime’s capacity to sustain the conflict and prevent it from turning American domestic fatigue into strategic survival. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

BIG | 🇺🇸🇮🇷‼️‼️ U.S. intelligence believes Tehran is settling in for a prolonged confrontation, increasingly confident that it can keep striking across the Middle East while using time, economic disruption and American political pressure as weapons against Washington. According to The New York Times, the conflict has given Iran a clearer understanding of its own military capabilities, while U.S. officials see few signs that Tehran is ready for serious negotiations or a comprehensive settlement. American assessments also warn that additional sanctions and economic pressure could intensify the already ongoing escalation in the short term. Tehran appears to believe that prolonging the confrontation can increase pressure on the Trump administration ahead of the November midterms, particularly through higher energy prices and growing war fatigue. Reuters reporting reinforces that concern: the conflict has already pushed oil prices sharply higher, while Trump’s approval remains at 33% and public support for the Iran war is weak. Tehran’s calculation is dangerous precisely because Trump’s strategy has not yet produced the decisive outcome Washington sought. Iran has been battered, but it has neither accepted a comprehensive settlement nor abandoned its ability to impose costs across the region, and the conflict is already in its seventh month. Simply applying more economic pressure while allowing the regime to dictate the tempo risks giving Tehran the prolonged contest it wants. Washington needs a clearer strategy that combines military pressure, economic isolation and political leverage to weaken the regime’s capacity to sustain the conflict and prevent it from turning American domestic fatigue into strategic survival. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

26,833 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

IRAN THREATENS U.S.: “WE ARE PREPARED FOR WAR” Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned the United States that Tehran is prepared to return to war if Washington does not implement what was discussed in recent understandings. Ghalibaf said Iran views violations of the agreement or ceasefire arrangements as a breach that will require a response. He pointed to recent strikes on U.S. bases in Bahrain and Kuwait as part of Iran’s message: “We are in negotiations, but if they do not want to implement what was discussed, we are prepared for war.” He added that Iran is following the situation in Lebanon “day and night” through both military and diplomatic channels, with a focus on ensuring that the terms discussed are implemented. In other words: Iran is negotiating with one hand — and threatening escalation with the other.
2:22

IRAN THREATENS U.S.: “WE ARE PREPARED FOR WAR” Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned the United States that Tehran is prepared to return to war if Washington does not implement what was discussed in recent understandings. Ghalibaf said Iran views violations of the agreement or ceasefire arrangements as a breach that will require a response. He pointed to recent strikes on U.S. bases in Bahrain and Kuwait as part of Iran’s message: “We are in negotiations, but if they do not want to implement what was discussed, we are prepared for war.” He added that Iran is following the situation in Lebanon “day and night” through both military and diplomatic channels, with a focus on ensuring that the terms discussed are implemented. In other words: Iran is negotiating with one hand — and threatening escalation with the other.

Mossad Commentary

44,628 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Iran is demanding an end to regional hostilities and compensation for damages before fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz, warning that talks over a temporary route don’t guarantee it will stay open. The U.S. blockade remains in place as Washington ramps up diplomatic, economic, and military pressure, though President Trump has suggested he could declare victory and move on if Iran fully reopens the strait, even without a nuclear deal. Vice President JD Vance says negotiations are still “in the middle of the game,” as U.S. and Israeli officials point to growing economic pressure on Tehran. Trey Yingst reports on the Middle East live from the region.
2:12

Iran is demanding an end to regional hostilities and compensation for damages before fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz, warning that talks over a temporary route don’t guarantee it will stay open. The U.S. blockade remains in place as Washington ramps up diplomatic, economic, and military pressure, though President Trump has suggested he could declare victory and move on if Iran fully reopens the strait, even without a nuclear deal. Vice President JD Vance says negotiations are still “in the middle of the game,” as U.S. and Israeli officials point to growing economic pressure on Tehran. Trey Yingst reports on the Middle East live from the region.

Fox News

556,088 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The High-Stakes Escalation in the Middle East 💥 " Trump can hit us hard... but Iran can hit back." Professor Seyed Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) lays out the stark reality of the Iran war and why the U.S. strategy is pushing the region toward a breaking point. “Iran is progressing… its missiles and drones are getting better as time goes on while the United States is facing a crisis.” “When the United States runs out of those critical weapon systems, Iran will still have missiles and drones.” He warns that if Washington strikes Iran’s infrastructure, “Iran will take out everything in the region… oil fields on fire and LNG refineries on fire.” That would trigger a global economic depression and force “millions of people… to leave the Arabian Peninsula.” And on Iran’s refusal to surrender: “If they submit… then the country is finished.” Marandi says Americans increasingly see this conflict for what it is: “This is a war for Netanyahu… Kushner’s war… not for the American people.” 👉 Watch the full clip — the stakes of the Iran war are now unmistakable.
2:02

The High-Stakes Escalation in the Middle East 💥 " Trump can hit us hard... but Iran can hit back." Professor Seyed Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) lays out the stark reality of the Iran war and why the U.S. strategy is pushing the region toward a breaking point. “Iran is progressing… its missiles and drones are getting better as time goes on while the United States is facing a crisis.” “When the United States runs out of those critical weapon systems, Iran will still have missiles and drones.” He warns that if Washington strikes Iran’s infrastructure, “Iran will take out everything in the region… oil fields on fire and LNG refineries on fire.” That would trigger a global economic depression and force “millions of people… to leave the Arabian Peninsula.” And on Iran’s refusal to surrender: “If they submit… then the country is finished.” Marandi says Americans increasingly see this conflict for what it is: “This is a war for Netanyahu… Kushner’s war… not for the American people.” 👉 Watch the full clip — the stakes of the Iran war are now unmistakable.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

15,214 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 BIG | President Donald Trump says the United States is currently "low-keying it" with Iran, signaling that Washington is holding back from another major military escalation while allowing economic pressure on Tehran to build. According to Axios, Trump said the U.S. is maintaining only limited negotiations with Iran while closely watching the country's deteriorating economic situation. "We're only semi-negotiating with them. We're just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact that they have no money," Trump said. The president argued that Iran is in "very bad shape" economically and is even struggling to pay its military personnel, while the U.S. naval blockade continues to intensify financial pressure on Tehran. Trump suggested that Washington is prepared to wait rather than immediately return to large-scale military operations, calculating that mounting economic pressure could eventually force Iran toward a more favorable agreement. "It will work out. It always works out. It's like a chess game," Trump said of the confrontation with Tehran. The remarks indicate that, for now, Washington appears willing to let economic pressure do much of the work while keeping military escalation available as leverage if diplomacy fails. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 BIG | President Donald Trump says the United States is currently "low-keying it" with Iran, signaling that Washington is holding back from another major military escalation while allowing economic pressure on Tehran to build. According to Axios, Trump said the U.S. is maintaining only limited negotiations with Iran while closely watching the country's deteriorating economic situation. "We're only semi-negotiating with them. We're just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact that they have no money," Trump said. The president argued that Iran is in "very bad shape" economically and is even struggling to pay its military personnel, while the U.S. naval blockade continues to intensify financial pressure on Tehran. Trump suggested that Washington is prepared to wait rather than immediately return to large-scale military operations, calculating that mounting economic pressure could eventually force Iran toward a more favorable agreement. "It will work out. It always works out. It's like a chess game," Trump said of the confrontation with Tehran. The remarks indicate that, for now, Washington appears willing to let economic pressure do much of the work while keeping military escalation available as leverage if diplomacy fails. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

51,951 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

BIG | 🇮🇷🇺🇸‼️‼️ Iran’s leadership is reportedly locked in a major internal struggle over how to break the increasingly costly deadlock with the United States, with one camp pushing for renewed negotiations while hard-line military figures advocate a much broader escalation of the war. According to The New York Times, hard-line commanders have proposed intensifying pressure on U.S. forces and regional energy infrastructure while mobilizing Iran-aligned groups, particularly the Houthis in Yemen and Shiite militias in Iraq. The strategy is intended to increase the economic and military costs of the conflict and pressure Washington over its naval blockade. President Masoud Pezeshkian and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf have opposed the escalation plan, warning that it could provoke heavier U.S. attacks and deepen Iran’s already severe economic crisis. The debate is becoming more consequential as Tehran’s economic position deteriorates while the regional conflict continues to widen. Iran’s hard-liners appear to believe that greater military pressure can create enough economic pain to force Washington toward concessions, but that strategy also carries the danger of triggering an even larger confrontation that Iran would struggle to sustain. The competing approach seeks to convert Tehran’s remaining leverage into negotiations before the blockade and prolonged war inflict still deeper economic damage. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

BIG | 🇮🇷🇺🇸‼️‼️ Iran’s leadership is reportedly locked in a major internal struggle over how to break the increasingly costly deadlock with the United States, with one camp pushing for renewed negotiations while hard-line military figures advocate a much broader escalation of the war. According to The New York Times, hard-line commanders have proposed intensifying pressure on U.S. forces and regional energy infrastructure while mobilizing Iran-aligned groups, particularly the Houthis in Yemen and Shiite militias in Iraq. The strategy is intended to increase the economic and military costs of the conflict and pressure Washington over its naval blockade. President Masoud Pezeshkian and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf have opposed the escalation plan, warning that it could provoke heavier U.S. attacks and deepen Iran’s already severe economic crisis. The debate is becoming more consequential as Tehran’s economic position deteriorates while the regional conflict continues to widen. Iran’s hard-liners appear to believe that greater military pressure can create enough economic pain to force Washington toward concessions, but that strategy also carries the danger of triggering an even larger confrontation that Iran would struggle to sustain. The competing approach seeks to convert Tehran’s remaining leverage into negotiations before the blockade and prolonged war inflict still deeper economic damage. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

35,983 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

In an interview for Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that Iran and the US agreed upon terms that "were very appealing to Iran," explaining that the US accepted a regional end to the war, an end to the war on Lebanon, and to put off discussions about the nuclear program until the second stage. "So the only thing that is in this text that hasn't been agreed upon yet is Iran saying that it will not build a nuclear weapon, but that's what Iran has been saying for decades. So that's not something new for Iran," Professor Marandi said. He explained that the US wanted the Strait of Hormuz to return to normal, but Iran did not accept that, explaining that what Iran accepted "will return to normal is the number of ships that pass through," while it maintains control of the Strait. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #AlMayadeen #Iran #IranWar #US #Hormuz
3:30

In an interview for Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that Iran and the US agreed upon terms that "were very appealing to Iran," explaining that the US accepted a regional end to the war, an end to the war on Lebanon, and to put off discussions about the nuclear program until the second stage. "So the only thing that is in this text that hasn't been agreed upon yet is Iran saying that it will not build a nuclear weapon, but that's what Iran has been saying for decades. So that's not something new for Iran," Professor Marandi said. He explained that the US wanted the Strait of Hormuz to return to normal, but Iran did not accept that, explaining that what Iran accepted "will return to normal is the number of ships that pass through," while it maintains control of the Strait. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #AlMayadeen #Iran #IranWar #US #Hormuz

Al Mayadeen English

15,274 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇺🇸❌🇮🇷 Trump is preparing to tighten the economic noose around an already battered Iran, betting that unprecedented financial pressure can force Tehran into a deal without immediately returning to large-scale military strikes. According to Bloomberg, the Trump administration is preparing “unprecedented economic measures” against Iran, with the goal of forcing Tehran toward an agreement before the November midterm elections. The move suggests that, for now, Trump prefers economic pressure and diplomacy over renewed strikes, despite calls from parts of the U.S. military leadership for a tougher military approach. Washington’s strategy now appears to be straightforward: use Iran’s weakened post-war economy as the battlefield and sanctions as the weapon. Tehran may have survived the military campaign, but if the U.S. can further restrict its oil revenues, financial access and ability to rebuild, Trump could try to achieve through economic strangulation what another costly round of warfare might not guarantee. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:26

🇺🇸❌🇮🇷 Trump is preparing to tighten the economic noose around an already battered Iran, betting that unprecedented financial pressure can force Tehran into a deal without immediately returning to large-scale military strikes. According to Bloomberg, the Trump administration is preparing “unprecedented economic measures” against Iran, with the goal of forcing Tehran toward an agreement before the November midterm elections. The move suggests that, for now, Trump prefers economic pressure and diplomacy over renewed strikes, despite calls from parts of the U.S. military leadership for a tougher military approach. Washington’s strategy now appears to be straightforward: use Iran’s weakened post-war economy as the battlefield and sanctions as the weapon. Tehran may have survived the military campaign, but if the U.S. can further restrict its oil revenues, financial access and ability to rebuild, Trump could try to achieve through economic strangulation what another costly round of warfare might not guarantee. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

18,048 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨Iran's President Calls To 'End The War' With America Immediately As US CONQUERS Hormuz Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is publicly calling for Iran to end the war... "The Government does not deny the shortages and that it would be better to end the war now, While Iran is in a position of strength and dignity." Irans currency has plummeted, their economy is bust, and their oil exports have halted. Simultaneously, the U.S. military has escorted 660 million barrels through the strait since May. Total dominance. A dirty peace is better than a long-term entanglement. Iran knows they’ve lost. You’re seeing the art of the deal unfold in real time.
9:17

🚨Iran's President Calls To 'End The War' With America Immediately As US CONQUERS Hormuz Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is publicly calling for Iran to end the war... "The Government does not deny the shortages and that it would be better to end the war now, While Iran is in a position of strength and dignity." Irans currency has plummeted, their economy is bust, and their oil exports have halted. Simultaneously, the U.S. military has escorted 660 million barrels through the strait since May. Total dominance. A dirty peace is better than a long-term entanglement. Iran knows they’ve lost. You’re seeing the art of the deal unfold in real time.

Benny Johnson

216,483 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Prof. Mohammad Marandi: If Trump’s sanctions actually work, war may become inevitable Iran's economy is unquestionably worse than before the war, he says. Infrastructure is damaged, sanctions hurt, and Tehran is shifting toward a wartime economy. But Iran isn't thinking about surrender. It's preparing for another war. Marandi argues Tehran has spent decades preparing for exactly this confrontation, building underground facilities while developing missiles and drones. And he believes Iran is now rapidly expanding those capabilities during the current lull. That creates a nasty paradox for Trump's “Economic D-Day.” If the sanctions fail, Iran can simply absorb the pressure and wait. If they succeed in seriously damaging Iran's economy, Marandi believes Tehran will retaliate, potentially targeting American economic and military interests across the Gulf. And Iran still has another lever: Hormuz. Marandi argues Tehran could gradually tighten the flow of oil and other critical commodities, increasing pressure on global markets without immediately returning to full-scale war. So Washington's problem is becoming increasingly uncomfortable. Sanctions that don't work accomplish very little. Sanctions that do work may restart the war. And Marandi's conclusion is remarkably simple: if Washington is serious about using economic pressure to overthrow the Iranian government, renewed conflict is “inevitable.” Seyed Mohammad Marandi
52:13

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Prof. Mohammad Marandi: If Trump’s sanctions actually work, war may become inevitable Iran's economy is unquestionably worse than before the war, he says. Infrastructure is damaged, sanctions hurt, and Tehran is shifting toward a wartime economy. But Iran isn't thinking about surrender. It's preparing for another war. Marandi argues Tehran has spent decades preparing for exactly this confrontation, building underground facilities while developing missiles and drones. And he believes Iran is now rapidly expanding those capabilities during the current lull. That creates a nasty paradox for Trump's “Economic D-Day.” If the sanctions fail, Iran can simply absorb the pressure and wait. If they succeed in seriously damaging Iran's economy, Marandi believes Tehran will retaliate, potentially targeting American economic and military interests across the Gulf. And Iran still has another lever: Hormuz. Marandi argues Tehran could gradually tighten the flow of oil and other critical commodities, increasing pressure on global markets without immediately returning to full-scale war. So Washington's problem is becoming increasingly uncomfortable. Sanctions that don't work accomplish very little. Sanctions that do work may restart the war. And Marandi's conclusion is remarkably simple: if Washington is serious about using economic pressure to overthrow the Iranian government, renewed conflict is “inevitable.” Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Mario Nawfal

317,433 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

🚨Zelenskyy: The Middle East is calling us. We’re at war, yet they’re reaching out to us. Those are important signals. Russia has lost a great deal there because of the war in Iran. “But if we’re united, it greatly strengthens our position at the negotiating table. The Middle East is calling us. Us. That’s the answer — this is what our army is like, what our state is like today. We’re at war, yet they’re reaching out to us. Those are important signals. I believe this war in Iran — yes, there are challenges: oil prices are rising, and Russia can profit from that, — but Russia has lost a great deal there. We may not fully feel it yet, but this isn’t Russia’s first partner. Syria, Iran, and others — none of these regimes are the first to stop seeing Russia as a strong state and a strong ally.” - Zelenskyy answers a question from the outstanding journalist Denys from Ukraine 🔥
1:08

🚨Zelenskyy: The Middle East is calling us. We’re at war, yet they’re reaching out to us. Those are important signals. Russia has lost a great deal there because of the war in Iran. “But if we’re united, it greatly strengthens our position at the negotiating table. The Middle East is calling us. Us. That’s the answer — this is what our army is like, what our state is like today. We’re at war, yet they’re reaching out to us. Those are important signals. I believe this war in Iran — yes, there are challenges: oil prices are rising, and Russia can profit from that, — but Russia has lost a great deal there. We may not fully feel it yet, but this isn’t Russia’s first partner. Syria, Iran, and others — none of these regimes are the first to stop seeing Russia as a strong state and a strong ally.” - Zelenskyy answers a question from the outstanding journalist Denys from Ukraine 🔥

Kateryna Lisunova

62,989 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨 THE U.S.-IRAN MEMORANDUM MAY BE A PAUSE — NOT PEACE 🚨 The memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran is unlikely to end the conflict permanently. Because the war against Iran was never only about nuclear policy or regional security. It was about reshaping Iran itself: weakening it, fragmenting it, gaining leverage over its energy resources, and ultimately controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Had that project succeeded, Israel would have emerged with enormous military, political, and economic leverage across West Asia. Every country hesitant to join the Abraham Accords would have faced growing pressure to enter an Israeli-led regional order. That is why I see this as a high-stakes, zero-sum struggle for the Israeli Zionist establishment. A memorandum can pause open warfare, but it cannot erase Israeli strategic ambitions, intelligence operations, psychological warfare, and regional competition that produced the conflict in the first place. I do not believe Iran is naive about this either. The war has shown that Tehran plans for worst-case scenarios, and I expect Iranian officials to assume that another phase of confrontation remains possible, potentially after the U.S. midterm elections, depending on political developments in Washington. For now, the conflict may be on the shelf, but it is not over.
5:04

🚨 THE U.S.-IRAN MEMORANDUM MAY BE A PAUSE — NOT PEACE 🚨 The memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran is unlikely to end the conflict permanently. Because the war against Iran was never only about nuclear policy or regional security. It was about reshaping Iran itself: weakening it, fragmenting it, gaining leverage over its energy resources, and ultimately controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Had that project succeeded, Israel would have emerged with enormous military, political, and economic leverage across West Asia. Every country hesitant to join the Abraham Accords would have faced growing pressure to enter an Israeli-led regional order. That is why I see this as a high-stakes, zero-sum struggle for the Israeli Zionist establishment. A memorandum can pause open warfare, but it cannot erase Israeli strategic ambitions, intelligence operations, psychological warfare, and regional competition that produced the conflict in the first place. I do not believe Iran is naive about this either. The war has shown that Tehran plans for worst-case scenarios, and I expect Iranian officials to assume that another phase of confrontation remains possible, potentially after the U.S. midterm elections, depending on political developments in Washington. For now, the conflict may be on the shelf, but it is not over.

Kevork Almassian

16,152 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🇮🇷 IRAN SAYS THE WAR COMES FIRST Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei says the current focus of negotiations is ending the war, not the details of the nuclear issue. In other words, Tehran is trying to separate the war from the nuclear file. He also dismissed threats and pressure as “images and assumptions” from the other side, saying Iran is continuing its work “on the ground.” Translation: Iran wants the fighting stopped first, while keeping the nuclear question for later. That is not a detail. That is the whole game.
1:18

🇮🇷 IRAN SAYS THE WAR COMES FIRST Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei says the current focus of negotiations is ending the war, not the details of the nuclear issue. In other words, Tehran is trying to separate the war from the nuclear file. He also dismissed threats and pressure as “images and assumptions” from the other side, saying Iran is continuing its work “on the ground.” Translation: Iran wants the fighting stopped first, while keeping the nuclear question for later. That is not a detail. That is the whole game.

Mossad Commentary

46,628 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce