Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

These big LLM's are going to change everything we know. I asked it to read a simple oil well log. I did not expect it to do much but it in fact did. If this is the progress they have already made, imagine what Grok and other LLM's will...

15,115 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 12

Фото профиля Roughest Neck Around
Roughest Neck Around1 год назад

I use Grok daily. It's insane what I can get it to do.

Фото профиля Oil Mutt
Oil Mutt1 год назад

It’s a great learning tool these days and only getting better

Фото профиля The Liberation Project
The Liberation Project1 год назад

𝑾𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒉𝒚 𝑬𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒔 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝑨𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝑾𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒉𝒚 𝑬𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒔 Multi-millionaire professor Scott Galloway tells the unadulterated facts about the decline of modern capitalism and extreme inequality. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Фото профиля Wes
Wes1 год назад

The pace of progress is just getting faster and faster

Фото профиля TrippingInTheHole
TrippingInTheHole1 год назад

Bro AI is going to put geologist out of business

Фото профиля ItsRainingLead
ItsRainingLead1 год назад

I use Grok or ChatGPT every day. You can get it to do a lot of interesting things, with some handholding, but less handholding than prior. It's only a matter of time before it will start being able to work with grid and contour files, or create them itself from data.

Фото профиля Steven Dawson
Steven Dawson1 год назад

@anasalhajji What is a LLM??

Фото профиля Nathan Hammer
Nathan Hammer1 год назад

Grok is leading the pack IMO for engineering and technical reasoning. Very good at solving super complex problems.

Фото профиля Oil Mutt
Oil Mutt1 год назад

It’s crazy how fast they are advancing

Фото профиля Avoid the Herd
Avoid the Herd1 год назад

What's the big deal? Logging companies could produce computerized analysis at the well site 40 years ago.

Фото профиля Chevron Executive (Parody)
Chevron Executive (Parody)1 год назад

Obtaining an opinion from a computer is not a new revelation. Capital self organizing around a robot and drilling a well is still very far out into the future. Stay focused and keep your nose on the grind stone.

Фото профиля Oil Mutt
Oil Mutt1 год назад

Obtaining an opinion? This is reading old documents. Slightly more than just an opinion. You do understand how complex ocr is right?

Похожие видео

Would you want to be a teacher on your staff as a principal? I have often asked teachers, would you want to be a learner in your own classroom, but the question above for administrators could be even more critical. If we do not support those closest to students every day in an effective manner, it is much harder for things to improve in schools. If we want learning to look different in classrooms, then leadership must also evolve. This doesn’t mean that everything done in the past has been wrong. Some things that mattered 50 years ago will matter now, both in learning and leadership. But replicating everything that was done in the past, whether it was effective or not, isn’t a great strategy for moving schools forward. I was blessed to learn from some amazing principals in my career, but I also learned about things that I hated as a teacher and swore that I would do my best not to replicate those strategies. I wrote this in my upcoming book co-authored with Allyson Apsey (Allyson Apsey) titled, “What Makes a Great Principal”: “If we do things in our schools and classrooms that were done hundreds of years ago that still work today, we should continue to do them. On the other hand, if we do new stuff just because it is new, but it doesn’t work, we shouldn’t be doing it. Whatever works for our community is where our focus should be, no matter when it originated.” What worked in the past? What would you change? What would you have wanted as a teacher, and how can you make that happen? Simply replicating the strategies of the past, whether good or bad, will not necessarily lead education to a better future. Innovation is crucial to leadership as much as it is to teaching and learning.

George Couros

22,738 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨TRUMP: IF THE RUSSIANS ARE HELPING IRAN, THEY’RE NOT DOING A VERY GOOD JOB. They could give all the information they want, but the people they're sending it to (Iranians) are overwhelmed. Russia would be overwhelmed, too. ENVOY WITKOFF said that he communicated to the Russians not to send targeting information or other assistance to the Iranians. "I strongly said that," he commented. JOURNALIST: Peter asked you a question yesterday. You said it wasn't the right time. But he was asking whether you have indications that Russia is supporting Iran somehow in this. TRUMP: I have no indication of that whatsoever. If they are, they're not doing a very good job because Iran is not doing too well. JOURNALIST: What about the Strait of Hormuz? There's really no traffic going through it right now. TRUMP: That's, you know, the ships' choice. But we have it cleaned out. We've wiped out their navy. Their navy is now at the bottom of the sea. So that's the choice. This is an incursion. We figured oil prices would go up, which they will. They'll also come down. They'll come down very fast. And we will have gotten rid of a major, major cancer on the face of the earth. We will have taken out a cancer. JOURNALIST: Secretary Bessent announced a move to temporarily allow certain Russian oil sales to India. Are you considering any other moves, including the SPR? TRUMP: If there were some, I would do it, just to take a little of the pressure off. The oil pressure. But there's a lot of oil. We've got a lot of oil. Our country has a tremendous amount. There's a lot of oil out there. JOURNALIST: Mr. Witkoff, have you communicated to the Russians not to send targeting information and other assistance to the Iranians? WITKOFF: I strongly said that. JOURNALIST: And do you believe that they are WITKOFF: I hope they're not. JOURNALIST: Do you see any evidence? TRUMP: We don't know, but (Russia) is not doing very well. If they are, it's not helping much. If you take a look at what's happened to Iran in the last week, if they're getting information, it's not helping them much. JOURNALIST: Even if it's not helping the Iranians particularly much, it's still involving themselves in a conflict that they're not... TRUMP: I guess they'd say, we do it against them, wouldn't they? Wouldn't they say that, we do it against them? I don't know. Look, they could give all the information that they want, but the people they're sending it to are overwhelmed. Russia would be overwhelmed, too. Anybody would be overwhelmed. We have the greatest military on earth, and I built it in my first term, and unfortunately, I'm forced to use it now.

Kateryna Lisunova

61,552 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

NBC’s Garrett Haake: “There's been so much political violence not just aimed at yourself, but at other members of, you know, members of congress, state house speakers, you name it. Is that just the cost of doing business to do politics in America anymore?” Trump: “Yeah.” Haake: “Well, what does that say about our country?” President Trump: “You know, we're not the only country you look at. There's great violence with all countries. I was talking to somebody from another country today, and they have numerous assassinations of political figures all over the world. You look at South America – in South America. It's like some of the numbers are just horrific. It's dangerous, dangerous stuff, whether it's here or someplace else. No country is immune, no country. Good question.” Haake: “Is it possible to turn the temperature down, at this point?” Trump: “Well, probably if I decided to just not do much, you know, if I let everybody rip us off and take advantage of us. Look, we're leading the world in trade now. We're leading the world in the military. We're the greatest military in the world. They rebuilt it in my first term, and now we use it because we have no choice. We can't let, as an example, Iran – we can't let them get a nuclear weapon, that everything will be peanuts compared to that. If they ever were given a nuclear weapon and they'd use it too. Marco and I were talking about it today. They would use it without even hesitation. We can't do that. It was a shame. I said, oh boy, look at the numbers. We just broke 50,000 in the Dow. We just broke 7,000 in the S&P. They said we couldn't do it in seven years, five years, four years. They were saying maybe in five or six years. And we did it in one year. And I called everybody together. I called all of these people and others and they said, uh, we have to take a little journey. I say, to do this. We just had the great number. We just broke 50,000 wasn't supposed to happen during my term, wasn't reachable, did it in one year. And I said, we're going to have to make a journey to Iran. They they're going to have a nuclear weapon if we don't do it. We had the B-2 bombers take them out. I terminated in the first term the Obama agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, which was a disaster. That was a road to a nuclear weapon. They would have used it. They would have used it 100%. So, you know, when you do things like that, you become a target. If I wasn't doing that, I guess I'd be a lot less of a target, but I'm honored to be.”

Curtis Houck

57,493 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад