Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨They CANNOT SCAN kilometers into SOLID ROCK! That is what skeptics of the Khafre Project’s findings say, and they are correct to point out that Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) can't do this. They are also TOTALLY MISTAKEN, here is why: The Khafre team are not using conventional SAR imaging... in the way critics assume. They are using a patented form of SAR Doppler Tomography, pioneered by Prof. Filippo Biondi. This is not simple surface imaging. It is a phase-coherent interferometric method that detects subtle Doppler frequency shifts caused by internal micro-vibrations within dense structures. Instead of trying to penetrate rock, it “listens” to tiny seismic vibrations in the stone. Biondi’s trick is to capture micro-motions. Tiny seismic or structural tremors slightly shift the radar’s frequency (Doppler effect). By analyzing these Doppler shifts across multiple SAR images, they can reconstruct a 3D tomographic image of what’s inside, like a CT-scan from space. Prof. Filippop Biondi's patent (PCT/EP2023/064345) explicitly describes processing “coherent vibrational Doppler information” in SAR to allow penetrating 3D imaging "over a depth of several kilometers". In other words, it effectively turns the radar into a spaceborne sonar, using Earth’s natural vibrations to “sound” the subsurface, something ordinary SAR can’t do. A peer-reviewed Remote Sensing paper describes using COSMO-SkyMed SAR data to map new shafts and chambers inside Khufu . This case study in a scientific journal shows the technique in action (with high-res 3D results!). Beyond pyramids, the technique has practical uses. For bridges and infrastructure, Biondi’s SAR Doppler method can extract a structure’s “vibration profile” from orbit. That profile highlights cracks or damage. In one study the team applied it to Italy’s Morandi Bridge before it collapsed, SAR-based vibration maps showed unusual energy spikes right at the failing pylon. They even imaged deep tunnels. The HarmonicSAR site reports they “detected for the first time the Gran-Sasso Physics Laboratory at 1.4 km below the Earth using SAR”. In other words, their tomography saw a known underground lab 1400 m under Italy! They’ve also done scans of mountain tunnels (San Gottardo). Biondi was co-author on a 2016 Scientific Reports paper tracking Iraq’s Mosul Dam instability via SAR. That study used spaceborne radar to measure tiny ground motions around the dam over time. It shows that SAR micro-motion techniques can monitor slow structural shifts on a large engineering project. In short, SAR Doppler Tomography isn’t ordinary radar, it’s like using satellites and the Earth’s own background hum to “see” underground. Think of it as applying a CT-scan or ultrasound-like method from orbit. It’s unconventional, but it’s patent-backed and has some peer-reviewed results. RECIEPTS: Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza Filippo Biondi's SAR/Doppler Patent Perspectives on the Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges by Synthetic Aperture Radar HarmonicSAR (Filippos Website) Mosul Dam SAR/Doppler Projectshow more

Jay Anderson

336,116 subscribers

169,956 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨BREAKING: New Radar Scan Reveals a Massive Engineered Substructure That Looks Like An Energy Grid Beneath the Giza Plateau🚨 Radar engineer Filippo Biondi just dropped the most explosive finding ever reported at Giza: eight clearly man-made, tube-like structures plunging more than a kilometer beneath the Khafre Pyramid and ending in huge 80-meter chambers. The structures are obviously artificially engineered and the synthetic aperture radar Doppler-tomography technique he used has precedent in accurately predicting underground structures (in both commercial and defense use cases). The Egyptian ministry of culture is extremely afraid this finding might rewrite their history. 1) The Core Structure: Eight hollow tubes (with two symmetrical sets of four) sit directly beneath the Khafre Pyramid’s base and run straight down over 1 km into the bedrock. They terminate in a massive chamber roughly 80 meters across. The shape is engineered; nothing in geology produces structures like this. 2) The Method Used: Regular SAR can’t see through rock. Biondi uses a Doppler-tomographic approach: the satellites measure tiny vibrations on the surface, and the inversion reconstructs what’s below from how those vibrations modulate the radar signal. It’s physics, not AI. 3) Independent Replication: The same underground structures appear in data from: • Umbra • Capella Space • ISI • COSMO-SkyMed If this were a glitch or artifact, it wouldn’t repeat across four separate systems. 4) Real-World Validation: Biondi’s method has already been tested against real sites where we know the exact layout. It has: • Mapped the Gran Sasso underground lab with exact accuracy • Reproduced the Osiris Shaft down to ~37 meters • Imaged magma and voids used in active civil-protection monitoring These aren’t speculative models...they match real measurements. 5) Giza As A Unified System: After Khafre, the team scanned the rest of the plateau. Similar tube-like structures miraculously appear beneath Menkaure (a smaller 2+2 pattern) and a single descending tube under the Sphinx. The evidence points to a giant connected system beneath all three monuments. 6) The Tunnel Network: The tomography shows a dense web of tunnels running between the pyramids and toward the Sphinx. Several known surface shafts, now blocked or filled with debris, look like the original access points into this network. 7) Water As A Key Variable: The Osiris Shaft contains water at about 33–37 meters. Biondi thinks water flow is part of how the system operates, possibly tied to vibrational or informational dynamics. He cites Preparata and Del Giudice’s work on coherent water domains but avoids any “power plant” jump. 8) Academia: Biondi already has a peer-reviewed SAR/Doppler tomography paper on the Khufu Pyramid in Remote Sensing. His larger Khafre + plateau paper is now in peer review. The work sticks to hard measurements: geometry, depth, replication. 9) Next Steps: The CAF Project is preparing a proposal to: • Clear out the sealed shafts between Khafre and the Sphinx • Run direct seismic surveys to confirm the satellite data • Enter the tunnel system if Egypt authorizes it At this point, approval from Cairo is the only barrier to verifying what the scans show. If those shafts are opened, the world may be looking at a multi-kilometer engineered complex beneath Giza. Full Documentary 👇

🚨BREAKING: New Radar Scan Reveals a Massive Engineered Substructure That Looks Like An Energy Grid Beneath the Giza Plateau🚨 Radar engineer Filippo Biondi just dropped the most explosive finding ever reported at Giza: eight clearly man-made, tube-like structures plunging more than a kilometer beneath the Khafre Pyramid and ending in huge 80-meter chambers. The structures are obviously artificially engineered and the synthetic aperture radar Doppler-tomography technique he used has precedent in accurately predicting underground structures (in both commercial and defense use cases). The Egyptian ministry of culture is extremely afraid this finding might rewrite their history. 1) The Core Structure: Eight hollow tubes (with two symmetrical sets of four) sit directly beneath the Khafre Pyramid’s base and run straight down over 1 km into the bedrock. They terminate in a massive chamber roughly 80 meters across. The shape is engineered; nothing in geology produces structures like this. 2) The Method Used: Regular SAR can’t see through rock. Biondi uses a Doppler-tomographic approach: the satellites measure tiny vibrations on the surface, and the inversion reconstructs what’s below from how those vibrations modulate the radar signal. It’s physics, not AI. 3) Independent Replication: The same underground structures appear in data from: • Umbra • Capella Space • ISI • COSMO-SkyMed If this were a glitch or artifact, it wouldn’t repeat across four separate systems. 4) Real-World Validation: Biondi’s method has already been tested against real sites where we know the exact layout. It has: • Mapped the Gran Sasso underground lab with exact accuracy • Reproduced the Osiris Shaft down to ~37 meters • Imaged magma and voids used in active civil-protection monitoring These aren’t speculative models...they match real measurements. 5) Giza As A Unified System: After Khafre, the team scanned the rest of the plateau. Similar tube-like structures miraculously appear beneath Menkaure (a smaller 2+2 pattern) and a single descending tube under the Sphinx. The evidence points to a giant connected system beneath all three monuments. 6) The Tunnel Network: The tomography shows a dense web of tunnels running between the pyramids and toward the Sphinx. Several known surface shafts, now blocked or filled with debris, look like the original access points into this network. 7) Water As A Key Variable: The Osiris Shaft contains water at about 33–37 meters. Biondi thinks water flow is part of how the system operates, possibly tied to vibrational or informational dynamics. He cites Preparata and Del Giudice’s work on coherent water domains but avoids any “power plant” jump. 8) Academia: Biondi already has a peer-reviewed SAR/Doppler tomography paper on the Khufu Pyramid in Remote Sensing. His larger Khafre + plateau paper is now in peer review. The work sticks to hard measurements: geometry, depth, replication. 9) Next Steps: The CAF Project is preparing a proposal to: • Clear out the sealed shafts between Khafre and the Sphinx • Run direct seismic surveys to confirm the satellite data • Enter the tunnel system if Egypt authorizes it At this point, approval from Cairo is the only barrier to verifying what the scans show. If those shafts are opened, the world may be looking at a multi-kilometer engineered complex beneath Giza. Full Documentary 👇

Jesse Michels

890,765 views • 8 months ago

🚨#BREAKING EGYPT STAIRCASES TO THE PRE FLOOD ERA as HUGE STRUCTURES are Discovered 2km BELOW Pyramid of Giza! Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza A research team consisting of Corrado Malanga, Armando Mei, Filippo Biondi, and Nicole Ciccole has released new findings from a SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) scan conducted on the Giza Plateau, focusing specifically on the underground structures beneath the Khafre Pyramid. This work is part of the ongoing Khafre Research Project, which leverages advanced satellite technology to explore the site’s hidden architecture. A mysterious L-shaped structure has been observed underground in the western cemetery of Giza. Known as the Cemetery of the Nobles or the Cemetery of the Pyramid Builders, it is an ancient burial ground located on the western bank of the Nile River, near the famous Giza pyramids in Egypt. The team used remote sensing technology to detect remains in the underlying structure. This cemetery served as the final resting place for individuals who held significant roles in ancient Egyptian society, including officials, administrators, and artisans involved in the construction of the pyramids. To look for more remains in the area, the team used electrical resistivity tomography, a geophysical imaging technique used to investigate the subsurface properties of the Earth, such as the distribution of rocks, soils, groundwater, and man-made structures. It involves sending electrical currents into the ground and the resistance is measured to detect underlying structures. According to a report in LiveScience, an anomaly was observed roughly 6.5 feet beneath the surface indicating the presence of some structure. Further investigation revealed an L-shaped structure measuring at least 33 feet in length. According to a paper published in the journal Archaeological Prospection, the structure seems to have been filled with sand, which means it was backfilled after it was constructed. The team has begun excavation to find out what this mysterious structure is could be a mix of sand and gravel, or perhaps an air void, the team said. Experts speculate that the structure is not natural in formation given it has a sharp shape. Dating back to the Old Kingdom period (around 2600-2100 BCE), the Western Cemetery contains a vast array of tombs, mastabas (rectangular structures with flat roofs), and burial shafts. These structures vary in size and complexity, reflecting the social status and wealth of the deceased individuals. One of the most famous tombs in the Western Cemetery is that of Queen Hetepheres I, the mother of King Khufu (Cheops), the builder of the Great Pyramid of Giza. Discovered in 1925 by archaeologist George Reisner, her tomb contained a wealth of artefacts, including furniture, jewellery, and other personal belongings, providing valuable insights into ancient Egyptian funerary practices and royal life. A problem with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is that, due to the poor penetrating action of electromagnetic waves inside solid bodies, the capability to observe inside distributed targets is precluded. Under these conditions, imaging action is provided only on the surface of distributed targets. The present work describes an imaging method based on the analysis of micro-movements on the Khnum-Khufu Pyramid, which are usually generated by background seismic waves. The results obtained prove to be very promising, as high-resolution full 3D tomographic imaging of the pyramid's interior and subsurface was achieved. Khnum-Khufu becomes transparent like a crystal when observed in the micro-movement domain. Based on this novelty, we have completely reconstructed internal objects, observing and measuring structures that have never been discovered before. The experimental results are estimated by processing series of SAR images from the second-generation ROBIN WESTENRA

🚨#BREAKING EGYPT STAIRCASES TO THE PRE FLOOD ERA as HUGE STRUCTURES are Discovered 2km BELOW Pyramid of Giza! Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza A research team consisting of Corrado Malanga, Armando Mei, Filippo Biondi, and Nicole Ciccole has released new findings from a SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) scan conducted on the Giza Plateau, focusing specifically on the underground structures beneath the Khafre Pyramid. This work is part of the ongoing Khafre Research Project, which leverages advanced satellite technology to explore the site’s hidden architecture. A mysterious L-shaped structure has been observed underground in the western cemetery of Giza. Known as the Cemetery of the Nobles or the Cemetery of the Pyramid Builders, it is an ancient burial ground located on the western bank of the Nile River, near the famous Giza pyramids in Egypt. The team used remote sensing technology to detect remains in the underlying structure. This cemetery served as the final resting place for individuals who held significant roles in ancient Egyptian society, including officials, administrators, and artisans involved in the construction of the pyramids. To look for more remains in the area, the team used electrical resistivity tomography, a geophysical imaging technique used to investigate the subsurface properties of the Earth, such as the distribution of rocks, soils, groundwater, and man-made structures. It involves sending electrical currents into the ground and the resistance is measured to detect underlying structures. According to a report in LiveScience, an anomaly was observed roughly 6.5 feet beneath the surface indicating the presence of some structure. Further investigation revealed an L-shaped structure measuring at least 33 feet in length. According to a paper published in the journal Archaeological Prospection, the structure seems to have been filled with sand, which means it was backfilled after it was constructed. The team has begun excavation to find out what this mysterious structure is could be a mix of sand and gravel, or perhaps an air void, the team said. Experts speculate that the structure is not natural in formation given it has a sharp shape. Dating back to the Old Kingdom period (around 2600-2100 BCE), the Western Cemetery contains a vast array of tombs, mastabas (rectangular structures with flat roofs), and burial shafts. These structures vary in size and complexity, reflecting the social status and wealth of the deceased individuals. One of the most famous tombs in the Western Cemetery is that of Queen Hetepheres I, the mother of King Khufu (Cheops), the builder of the Great Pyramid of Giza. Discovered in 1925 by archaeologist George Reisner, her tomb contained a wealth of artefacts, including furniture, jewellery, and other personal belongings, providing valuable insights into ancient Egyptian funerary practices and royal life. A problem with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is that, due to the poor penetrating action of electromagnetic waves inside solid bodies, the capability to observe inside distributed targets is precluded. Under these conditions, imaging action is provided only on the surface of distributed targets. The present work describes an imaging method based on the analysis of micro-movements on the Khnum-Khufu Pyramid, which are usually generated by background seismic waves. The results obtained prove to be very promising, as high-resolution full 3D tomographic imaging of the pyramid's interior and subsurface was achieved. Khnum-Khufu becomes transparent like a crystal when observed in the micro-movement domain. Based on this novelty, we have completely reconstructed internal objects, observing and measuring structures that have never been discovered before. The experimental results are estimated by processing series of SAR images from the second-generation ROBIN WESTENRA

SANTINO

45,503 views • 1 year ago

The same satellite tech can track a convoy through dense cloud cover at night, flag a sinkhole weeks before it opens, catch a village built on a collapsing slope, and even map the inside of a pyramid from orbit. It's called Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and a lot of the data is free. In this video I cover the physics, the commercial arms race, and the defense constellation that will track every moving vehicle on Earth by the 2030s. 0:00 - A convoy no camera can see 0:56 - What is Synthetic Aperture Radar? 2:02 - InSAR: sub-millimeter change detection 3:07 - They scanned inside a pyramid from space 4:20 - These cities are sinking faster than sea levels rise 5:00 - North American bridges are the worst on Earth 6:09 - An AI caught a village built on a landslide 7:50 - The commercial SAR arms race 9:01 - GMTI: tracking convoys in the dark 11:26 - NISAR: the billion-dollar SAR satellite 12:45 - The other side of this all Full video on YT on Bilawal Sidhu channel. Enjoy.

The same satellite tech can track a convoy through dense cloud cover at night, flag a sinkhole weeks before it opens, catch a village built on a collapsing slope, and even map the inside of a pyramid from orbit. It's called Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and a lot of the data is free. In this video I cover the physics, the commercial arms race, and the defense constellation that will track every moving vehicle on Earth by the 2030s. 0:00 - A convoy no camera can see 0:56 - What is Synthetic Aperture Radar? 2:02 - InSAR: sub-millimeter change detection 3:07 - They scanned inside a pyramid from space 4:20 - These cities are sinking faster than sea levels rise 5:00 - North American bridges are the worst on Earth 6:09 - An AI caught a village built on a landslide 7:50 - The commercial SAR arms race 9:01 - GMTI: tracking convoys in the dark 11:26 - NISAR: the billion-dollar SAR satellite 12:45 - The other side of this all Full video on YT on Bilawal Sidhu channel. Enjoy.

Bilawal Sidhu

46,762 views • 3 months ago

This researcher just discovered 8 “huge structures” under the Pyramids in Egypt. They go over 1 km deep. And they connect to a massive hidden chamber deep underground. Filippo Biondi: “We have measurements … using a synthetic aperture radar.” “We are seeing huge structures that are connected to the base of the Khafre Pyramid.” “These structures are extending underneath for … approximately over one kilometer of depth.” “The structures are like tubes that are connected to the base of the pyramid.” “We are counting, at the moment, four plus four tubes that are descending underneath.” “They are connecting the top—so the base of the pyramid—to something that is located at the bottom.” “At the bottom, we probably have huge chambers, approximately 80 meters wide, and also of height 80 meters on the bottom.” “What we know now is this, there are these huge tubes that are descending underneath.” “And we have noticed that these tubes has a sort of spiral nature.” “Each tube has a core in the center, which … connects the spirals.” Jesse Michels Khafre Research Project SAR Technology

This researcher just discovered 8 “huge structures” under the Pyramids in Egypt. They go over 1 km deep. And they connect to a massive hidden chamber deep underground. Filippo Biondi: “We have measurements … using a synthetic aperture radar.” “We are seeing huge structures that are connected to the base of the Khafre Pyramid.” “These structures are extending underneath for … approximately over one kilometer of depth.” “The structures are like tubes that are connected to the base of the pyramid.” “We are counting, at the moment, four plus four tubes that are descending underneath.” “They are connecting the top—so the base of the pyramid—to something that is located at the bottom.” “At the bottom, we probably have huge chambers, approximately 80 meters wide, and also of height 80 meters on the bottom.” “What we know now is this, there are these huge tubes that are descending underneath.” “And we have noticed that these tubes has a sort of spiral nature.” “Each tube has a core in the center, which … connects the spirals.” Jesse Michels Khafre Research Project SAR Technology

Holden Culotta

33,743 views • 8 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Italian radar engineer Filippo Biondi just dropped the biggest bombshell in archaeology history on Jesse Michels podcast Using cutting-edge Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) from satellites, his team has detected: - EIGHT massive man-made vertical shafts beneath the Giza Pyramids - Two enormous underground structures over 1 KM long - Massive hidden chambers more than 600 meters deep (twice as deep as previously thought possible) These are NOT natural voids. The geometry is perfectly symmetrical and engineered. This isn’t a “theory.” This is peer-reviewed radar tomography data that just got published. We’ve been staring at the pyramids for 4,500 years… and the real complex was underground the entire time. What did the ancients hide down there? Joe Rogan & Jay Anderson have also given their opinions in the latest episode of American Alchemy Full paper just dropped. History books are officially obsolete tonight. #Giza #Pyramids #AncientEgypt #Archaeology #HiddenChambers

🚨 BREAKING: Italian radar engineer Filippo Biondi just dropped the biggest bombshell in archaeology history on Jesse Michels podcast Using cutting-edge Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) from satellites, his team has detected: - EIGHT massive man-made vertical shafts beneath the Giza Pyramids - Two enormous underground structures over 1 KM long - Massive hidden chambers more than 600 meters deep (twice as deep as previously thought possible) These are NOT natural voids. The geometry is perfectly symmetrical and engineered. This isn’t a “theory.” This is peer-reviewed radar tomography data that just got published. We’ve been staring at the pyramids for 4,500 years… and the real complex was underground the entire time. What did the ancients hide down there? Joe Rogan & Jay Anderson have also given their opinions in the latest episode of American Alchemy Full paper just dropped. History books are officially obsolete tonight. #Giza #Pyramids #AncientEgypt #Archaeology #HiddenChambers

Interstellar

301,449 views • 8 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Italian radar scientist detected what appears to be a massive grid of eight cylindrical structures, each 20 meters in diameter, descending over a kilometer beneath the Giza pyramids using Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography. The cylindrical columns have coils wrapping around them resulting in a megastructure that looks like an ancient energy grid 🚨 So I brought in Geoffrey Drumm, one of the most technically rigorous pyramid researchers alive, to stress test every claim in real time. What followed was a four hour technical interrogation that revealed both stunning validations and unresolved questions about what may be the most significant archaeological discovery of the century. Biondi holds a PhD in radar science, 30 years in the field, and invented a proprietary method called the Biondi Protocol that reads surface micro-vibrations detected by Italian COSMO-SkyMed satellites to reconstruct what lies inside and beneath solid structures. His first peer-reviewed paper scanned the Great Pyramid in 2020. His second project scanned the Khafre Pyramid and the wider Giza Plateau, producing the 3D model that broke the internet: eight tubular columns with coils wrapping around them, sitting on a foundation of enormous cube-shaped structures, extending beneath all three pyramids and the Sphinx. Drumm is the author of The Land of Chem YouTube channel, lives in Egypt, and has developed a comprehensive hypothesis that the pyramids functioned as industrial-scale chemical reactors powered by lightning during the Saharan Humid Period. He knows the Giza Plateau like the back of his hand and has previously stress tested and poked holes in Biondi’s findings. This conversation is an unfiltered exchange between two heavyweights: 1. Biondi's Best Scan Is Jaw-Dropping As validation, Biondi presented a proof-of-concept scan of Italy's Gran Sasso National Laboratory, buried 1.4 kilometers inside a mountain. The image is stunning. You can see the tunnel cutting through the mountain, the interior of the facility, and even the interferometer inside it using the same technique Biondi used to scan beneath the pyramids. Drumm called it the single most convincing piece of evidence that this technology works. The Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland produced a similarly clear image at two kilometers depth through solid rock. These are not theoretical demonstrations. They are working scans of known structures at extreme depth, and they validate that the Biondi Protocol can see through kilometers of stone. 2. He Found a Hidden Corridor Before Anyone Else In his 2020 paper, Biondi identified a feature on the northern face of the Great Pyramid labeled Tag 17. A dead-end corridor behind the chevron stones that nobody knew existed. Years later, the ScanPyramids muon team confirmed it and drilled in with a microscopic camera. Biondi's measurements of the corridor's length and the positions of its floor and ceiling matched what was found. This is a confirmed prediction from satellite radar, made years before physical verification. 3. He Detected a Sealed Shaft Beneath the Queen's Chamber One of the most compelling findings from the 2020 paper is a shaft and chamber system descending from the bottom of the Queen's Chamber. This structure was actually reported in 19th century excavation documents. Explorers found a pit in the Queen's Chamber floor, excavated down, and discovered a tunnel system below it. The Egyptian authorities then permanently sealed it with modern blocks. Biondi's scans picked it up independently, with no prior knowledge of those historical records. Drumm, who had already proposed this exact extraction shaft in his own chemical reactor model, called this the most promising result in the entire dataset. 4. The Substructures Are Enormous The tubular columns beneath the Khafre Pyramid measure approximately 20 meters in diameter each, spaced about 5 meters apart. That is 65 feet across per column. Eight of them. For context, the Queen's Chamber sometimes fails to register in certain scan slices because it is too small relative to the tomographic line. Biondi's argument is that megastructures at this scale are exactly what the technology is built to detect. Small chambers can be missed depending on the angle of the satellite pass. Repeating cylindrical structures 20 meters wide, appearing consistently across multiple scan geometries and multiple satellite sensors, are a different category of detection entirely. 5. Drumm's Challenge: The Processing Gap Here is where the debate gets sharp. The Gran Sasso and Gotthard scans used an advanced processing technique that averages noise across adjacent tomographic slices, requiring months of computation on borrowed hardware. The pyramid scans used a faster but noisier method on Biondi's own limited computers. Drumm pointed out that the quality difference is massive. The proof-of-concept images are transparent like a crystal. The pyramid images require expert interpretation to read. Biondi's response: he needs an array of GPUs he cannot afford. With that hardware, he says he could produce Gran Sasso-quality scans of the Giza substructures in near real-time. Estimated cost: millions. This is the bottleneck standing between a controversial claim and a potentially world-changing confirmation. 6. Other issues: Known Chambers Sometimes Do Not Appear Drumm walked through the 2020 dataset scan by scan. The Queen's Chamber shows a strong, consistent signature and serves as a reliable benchmark. But in several tomographic slices, the King's Chamber does not appear. The Grand Gallery does not appear. The subterranean chamber does not appear. Biondi attributes this to single-slice geometry. Each scan captures one vertical curtain through the structure in 15 seconds. If that curtain does not intersect a chamber precisely, it will not register. He says the real-time GPU system would allow him to sweep through hundreds of adjacent slices and reconstruct a full 3D volume. That system does not yet exist. 7. Biondi Challenged the Muon Team's Interpretation The ScanPyramids muon team claims the Big Void inside the Great Pyramid runs north to south, parallel to and above the Grand Gallery. Biondi's scans show it running east to west, connected to structures wrapping around the King's Chamber. Looking at the muon data during the conversation, Biondi argued they may have confused the floor and roof of the Grand Gallery for two separate features. The Egyptian Ministry of Antiquities is using the muon team's interpretation to justify drilling into the Great Pyramid in 2026. If Biondi is right about the orientation, that excavation could validate SAR Doppler tomography over the established method in one stroke. 8. The Signal Fades at 600 Meters and Nobody Knows Why The model shows structures extending over a kilometer deep. But in the raw data, the signal tapers around 600 meters. Drumm pressed Biondi on this. The initial explanation was the water table, but both agreed the actual water table sits only about 50 meters below the plateau. When pushed further, Biondi said he cannot yet explain the change but hinted at something he is not authorized to disclose. The structures do continue in the model below that line, detected across multiple satellite sensors showing the same cutoff pattern. What changes at 600 meters remains an open question. 9. Drumm's Model Says the Substructures Could Make Functional Sense Drumm's hypothesis is that each pyramid produced a specific chemical in sequence, from methane extraction at the Step Pyramid to ammonia synthesis in the Red Pyramid to sulfuric acid production in the Great Pyramid. He places the operational period during the Saharan Humid Period, roughly 8500 to 5300 BC, when massive thunderstorms provided the electrical input. The Big Void sits exactly where a heat exchanger would need to be to manage exothermic reactions in the Grand Gallery. The sealed shaft beneath the Queen's Chamber aligns with his proposed product extraction system. He confirmed that he has already integrated Biondi's substructure findings into a working functional model. If the deep structures are real, they connect to known hydrothermal mineral deposits, iron ore veins, and rare earth elements embedded in the Giza bedrock. Drumm and Biondi both agree: whoever built these structures chose the Giza Plateau for a very specific reason tied to what lies beneath it. 10. Validation & What Comes Next Biondi wants to establish a foundation in Malta with a dedicated data center and GPU array to reprocess the Giza data using his superior technique. Drumm wants to go to the Giza Plateau with Biondi's team to physically investigate anomalies he has already identified near the Osiris Shaft and along the Khafre causeway. Both say the SAR method and the muon method should be combined rather than treated as competitors. Both state that the conventional dating and tomb explanation for the pyramids is wrong. And both Drumm and Biondi agree that what lies beneath the Giza Plateau is more important than what sits on top of it. They also agree on the need for further validation and stress-testing. Why This Matters A satellite technique that can see through 1.4 kilometers of mountain and accurately image the Gran Sasso Laboratory. A confirmed prediction of a hidden corridor inside the Great Pyramid years before physical verification. A detection of a sealed shaft that matches 19th century excavation records. And now, scans showing a repeating grid of massive cylindrical structures beneath the entire Giza Plateau that no conventional archaeological framework can account for. The technology has demonstrated real capability. The substructure claims remain extraordinary. The 2026 Big Void excavation and GPU-powered rescans could settle this within months. If even a fraction of what Biondi is detecting turns out to be real, we are looking at the largest undiscovered structure on Earth, hidden in plain sight beneath the most studied archaeological site in human history. Full conversation covers all of this and much more. One of the most important technical examinations of the pyramid mystery ever recorded. Live now👇

🚨 BREAKING: Italian radar scientist detected what appears to be a massive grid of eight cylindrical structures, each 20 meters in diameter, descending over a kilometer beneath the Giza pyramids using Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography. The cylindrical columns have coils wrapping around them resulting in a megastructure that looks like an ancient energy grid 🚨 So I brought in Geoffrey Drumm, one of the most technically rigorous pyramid researchers alive, to stress test every claim in real time. What followed was a four hour technical interrogation that revealed both stunning validations and unresolved questions about what may be the most significant archaeological discovery of the century. Biondi holds a PhD in radar science, 30 years in the field, and invented a proprietary method called the Biondi Protocol that reads surface micro-vibrations detected by Italian COSMO-SkyMed satellites to reconstruct what lies inside and beneath solid structures. His first peer-reviewed paper scanned the Great Pyramid in 2020. His second project scanned the Khafre Pyramid and the wider Giza Plateau, producing the 3D model that broke the internet: eight tubular columns with coils wrapping around them, sitting on a foundation of enormous cube-shaped structures, extending beneath all three pyramids and the Sphinx. Drumm is the author of The Land of Chem YouTube channel, lives in Egypt, and has developed a comprehensive hypothesis that the pyramids functioned as industrial-scale chemical reactors powered by lightning during the Saharan Humid Period. He knows the Giza Plateau like the back of his hand and has previously stress tested and poked holes in Biondi’s findings. This conversation is an unfiltered exchange between two heavyweights: 1. Biondi's Best Scan Is Jaw-Dropping As validation, Biondi presented a proof-of-concept scan of Italy's Gran Sasso National Laboratory, buried 1.4 kilometers inside a mountain. The image is stunning. You can see the tunnel cutting through the mountain, the interior of the facility, and even the interferometer inside it using the same technique Biondi used to scan beneath the pyramids. Drumm called it the single most convincing piece of evidence that this technology works. The Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland produced a similarly clear image at two kilometers depth through solid rock. These are not theoretical demonstrations. They are working scans of known structures at extreme depth, and they validate that the Biondi Protocol can see through kilometers of stone. 2. He Found a Hidden Corridor Before Anyone Else In his 2020 paper, Biondi identified a feature on the northern face of the Great Pyramid labeled Tag 17. A dead-end corridor behind the chevron stones that nobody knew existed. Years later, the ScanPyramids muon team confirmed it and drilled in with a microscopic camera. Biondi's measurements of the corridor's length and the positions of its floor and ceiling matched what was found. This is a confirmed prediction from satellite radar, made years before physical verification. 3. He Detected a Sealed Shaft Beneath the Queen's Chamber One of the most compelling findings from the 2020 paper is a shaft and chamber system descending from the bottom of the Queen's Chamber. This structure was actually reported in 19th century excavation documents. Explorers found a pit in the Queen's Chamber floor, excavated down, and discovered a tunnel system below it. The Egyptian authorities then permanently sealed it with modern blocks. Biondi's scans picked it up independently, with no prior knowledge of those historical records. Drumm, who had already proposed this exact extraction shaft in his own chemical reactor model, called this the most promising result in the entire dataset. 4. The Substructures Are Enormous The tubular columns beneath the Khafre Pyramid measure approximately 20 meters in diameter each, spaced about 5 meters apart. That is 65 feet across per column. Eight of them. For context, the Queen's Chamber sometimes fails to register in certain scan slices because it is too small relative to the tomographic line. Biondi's argument is that megastructures at this scale are exactly what the technology is built to detect. Small chambers can be missed depending on the angle of the satellite pass. Repeating cylindrical structures 20 meters wide, appearing consistently across multiple scan geometries and multiple satellite sensors, are a different category of detection entirely. 5. Drumm's Challenge: The Processing Gap Here is where the debate gets sharp. The Gran Sasso and Gotthard scans used an advanced processing technique that averages noise across adjacent tomographic slices, requiring months of computation on borrowed hardware. The pyramid scans used a faster but noisier method on Biondi's own limited computers. Drumm pointed out that the quality difference is massive. The proof-of-concept images are transparent like a crystal. The pyramid images require expert interpretation to read. Biondi's response: he needs an array of GPUs he cannot afford. With that hardware, he says he could produce Gran Sasso-quality scans of the Giza substructures in near real-time. Estimated cost: millions. This is the bottleneck standing between a controversial claim and a potentially world-changing confirmation. 6. Other issues: Known Chambers Sometimes Do Not Appear Drumm walked through the 2020 dataset scan by scan. The Queen's Chamber shows a strong, consistent signature and serves as a reliable benchmark. But in several tomographic slices, the King's Chamber does not appear. The Grand Gallery does not appear. The subterranean chamber does not appear. Biondi attributes this to single-slice geometry. Each scan captures one vertical curtain through the structure in 15 seconds. If that curtain does not intersect a chamber precisely, it will not register. He says the real-time GPU system would allow him to sweep through hundreds of adjacent slices and reconstruct a full 3D volume. That system does not yet exist. 7. Biondi Challenged the Muon Team's Interpretation The ScanPyramids muon team claims the Big Void inside the Great Pyramid runs north to south, parallel to and above the Grand Gallery. Biondi's scans show it running east to west, connected to structures wrapping around the King's Chamber. Looking at the muon data during the conversation, Biondi argued they may have confused the floor and roof of the Grand Gallery for two separate features. The Egyptian Ministry of Antiquities is using the muon team's interpretation to justify drilling into the Great Pyramid in 2026. If Biondi is right about the orientation, that excavation could validate SAR Doppler tomography over the established method in one stroke. 8. The Signal Fades at 600 Meters and Nobody Knows Why The model shows structures extending over a kilometer deep. But in the raw data, the signal tapers around 600 meters. Drumm pressed Biondi on this. The initial explanation was the water table, but both agreed the actual water table sits only about 50 meters below the plateau. When pushed further, Biondi said he cannot yet explain the change but hinted at something he is not authorized to disclose. The structures do continue in the model below that line, detected across multiple satellite sensors showing the same cutoff pattern. What changes at 600 meters remains an open question. 9. Drumm's Model Says the Substructures Could Make Functional Sense Drumm's hypothesis is that each pyramid produced a specific chemical in sequence, from methane extraction at the Step Pyramid to ammonia synthesis in the Red Pyramid to sulfuric acid production in the Great Pyramid. He places the operational period during the Saharan Humid Period, roughly 8500 to 5300 BC, when massive thunderstorms provided the electrical input. The Big Void sits exactly where a heat exchanger would need to be to manage exothermic reactions in the Grand Gallery. The sealed shaft beneath the Queen's Chamber aligns with his proposed product extraction system. He confirmed that he has already integrated Biondi's substructure findings into a working functional model. If the deep structures are real, they connect to known hydrothermal mineral deposits, iron ore veins, and rare earth elements embedded in the Giza bedrock. Drumm and Biondi both agree: whoever built these structures chose the Giza Plateau for a very specific reason tied to what lies beneath it. 10. Validation & What Comes Next Biondi wants to establish a foundation in Malta with a dedicated data center and GPU array to reprocess the Giza data using his superior technique. Drumm wants to go to the Giza Plateau with Biondi's team to physically investigate anomalies he has already identified near the Osiris Shaft and along the Khafre causeway. Both say the SAR method and the muon method should be combined rather than treated as competitors. Both state that the conventional dating and tomb explanation for the pyramids is wrong. And both Drumm and Biondi agree that what lies beneath the Giza Plateau is more important than what sits on top of it. They also agree on the need for further validation and stress-testing. Why This Matters A satellite technique that can see through 1.4 kilometers of mountain and accurately image the Gran Sasso Laboratory. A confirmed prediction of a hidden corridor inside the Great Pyramid years before physical verification. A detection of a sealed shaft that matches 19th century excavation records. And now, scans showing a repeating grid of massive cylindrical structures beneath the entire Giza Plateau that no conventional archaeological framework can account for. The technology has demonstrated real capability. The substructure claims remain extraordinary. The 2026 Big Void excavation and GPU-powered rescans could settle this within months. If even a fraction of what Biondi is detecting turns out to be real, we are looking at the largest undiscovered structure on Earth, hidden in plain sight beneath the most studied archaeological site in human history. Full conversation covers all of this and much more. One of the most important technical examinations of the pyramid mystery ever recorded. Live now👇

Jesse Michels

1,071,923 views • 5 months ago

They scanned the Great Pyramid with the same tech used on nuclear reactors. What showed up inside doesn't make sense. Using muon tomography, the same cosmic-ray imaging technique used to scan volcanoes and nuclear reactors, researchers overlaid the internal configuration of the Great Pyramid against their tomographic results. But what you're seeing in those viral scan images isn't whats really there. It's raw data like a photo taken with a camera body and no lens. The image exists, but it's unfocused say Biondi. It takes a mathematical process (a Fourier transform) to "develop" that image into something readable. Meaning the anomalies detected inside the pyramid had to survive multiple layers of rigorous data processing before anyone even acknowledged they were real. If the Great Pyramid was just a tomb, why does it keep revealing hidden structures that Egyptology never predicted and that only cutting-edge particle physics can detect? Episode out now!

They scanned the Great Pyramid with the same tech used on nuclear reactors. What showed up inside doesn't make sense. Using muon tomography, the same cosmic-ray imaging technique used to scan volcanoes and nuclear reactors, researchers overlaid the internal configuration of the Great Pyramid against their tomographic results. But what you're seeing in those viral scan images isn't whats really there. It's raw data like a photo taken with a camera body and no lens. The image exists, but it's unfocused say Biondi. It takes a mathematical process (a Fourier transform) to "develop" that image into something readable. Meaning the anomalies detected inside the pyramid had to survive multiple layers of rigorous data processing before anyone even acknowledged they were real. If the Great Pyramid was just a tomb, why does it keep revealing hidden structures that Egyptology never predicted and that only cutting-edge particle physics can detect? Episode out now!

American Alchemy

18,271 views • 5 months ago

Filippo Biondi found evidence of eight “massive structures” 1 km below the Pyramids. And they look man-made. Mainstream archaeology called him a conspiracy theorist. For the first time, he just sat down to answer the critics head-on. Nothing was off limits. Watch Jesse Michels and Geoffrey Drumm press him to explain the biggest objection to his discovery: Drumm: “The big objection is the fact that the known chambers are not shown on the data.” “This is above the Belzoni Chamber here, and the known chambers should be somewhere down here.” “This is no deeper than 15 meters into the bedrock—and the radar signal is absorbed in that limestone bedrock.” Jesse Michels: “If you’re saying that the signal is getting absorbed and attenuated because of limestone that’s just 15 meters deep, then how are you detecting those structures a kilometer deep through the same limestone?” Biondi: “It is a question of measurements.” “Considering the particular configuration of those huge tubes descending approximately more than one kilometer having a diameter of approximately 20 meters, we can see that they’re very big.” “So you are comparing a very small object with huge structures.” “In this case, the very small things are not detected.” “It’s obvious that we have to continue to do this work.” “We have to continue to scan the Khafre Pyramid.” “I am sure that we will find results that show us also the Belzoni Chamber.” Drumm: “This is critical because, again, to say that the energy and the micro vibrations are absorbed in bedrock 15 meters deep—the deeper you go, the more bedrock there is to prevent these vibrations from being detected.” “This is the biggest objection that’s been proposed in the community.” Biondi: “We found that if things are anchored on the surface of the Earth anchored … we see it very clear.” “The shafts are directly connected to the surface of the Earth.” “The surface vibrates, we can detect the vibrations.” “In that case, the Belzoni is something that is not directly connected.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Filippo Biondi found evidence of eight “massive structures” 1 km below the Pyramids. And they look man-made. Mainstream archaeology called him a conspiracy theorist. For the first time, he just sat down to answer the critics head-on. Nothing was off limits. Watch Jesse Michels and Geoffrey Drumm press him to explain the biggest objection to his discovery: Drumm: “The big objection is the fact that the known chambers are not shown on the data.” “This is above the Belzoni Chamber here, and the known chambers should be somewhere down here.” “This is no deeper than 15 meters into the bedrock—and the radar signal is absorbed in that limestone bedrock.” Jesse Michels: “If you’re saying that the signal is getting absorbed and attenuated because of limestone that’s just 15 meters deep, then how are you detecting those structures a kilometer deep through the same limestone?” Biondi: “It is a question of measurements.” “Considering the particular configuration of those huge tubes descending approximately more than one kilometer having a diameter of approximately 20 meters, we can see that they’re very big.” “So you are comparing a very small object with huge structures.” “In this case, the very small things are not detected.” “It’s obvious that we have to continue to do this work.” “We have to continue to scan the Khafre Pyramid.” “I am sure that we will find results that show us also the Belzoni Chamber.” Drumm: “This is critical because, again, to say that the energy and the micro vibrations are absorbed in bedrock 15 meters deep—the deeper you go, the more bedrock there is to prevent these vibrations from being detected.” “This is the biggest objection that’s been proposed in the community.” Biondi: “We found that if things are anchored on the surface of the Earth anchored … we see it very clear.” “The shafts are directly connected to the surface of the Earth.” “The surface vibrates, we can detect the vibrations.” “In that case, the Belzoni is something that is not directly connected.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

24,613 views • 5 months ago

Discovery of secret tunnels below Egypt's Giza pyramids linked to forgotten underworld | Armando Mei, Daily Mail On the northeastern edge of the Giza Plateau, I discovered three perfectly cut shafts hidden beneath the sands. They sit in the triangle between the Great Sphinx, Khufu's Pyramid and Khafre's Pyramid, and may open into a long-forgotten underground world. These are not water wells. They bear no inscriptions, no signs of casual digging, and their geometry is too precise, their walls too smooth, their design too deliberate. Could these shafts be the keys to the network of hidden chambers the Greek philosopher Herodotus once whispered about, possibly connected to the Nile? Herodotus described a massive 'labyrinth' in Egypt with 3,000 chambers, many hidden below ground, which included and a large underground pyramid. Explorers in the 1800s, like Giovanni Caviglia and Henry Salt, recorded strange wells near the Sphinx and Khafre's causeway. French archaeologist Pierre-Jean Mariette mapped additional anomalies in 1864 and 1885, and scholars like George Reisner, Hermann Junker, and Selim Hassan traced a line of cavities between the Sphinx and Khafre's Pyramid between 1929 and 1939. After that, the area was largely forgotten. Fragments of those old reports hinted at a larger pattern, one pointing to a vast, interconnected world beneath the plateau. Now, the three shafts I rediscovered may unlock that hidden map. I came across the shafts while conducting fieldwork with the Khafre Research Project, where I serve as a researcher. Our team, including Professor Corrado Malanga and engineer Filippo Biondi, used Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite technology to investigate subsurface structures beneath Giza. Guided by these spectral traces, we located the shafts, still standing, perfectly cut and utterly enigmatic. The first shaft lies northeast of the Sphinx. Its square mouth, framed by limestone blocks, plunges 130 feet, about the height of a 12-story building. Its walls are squared with astonishing precision, lined with limestone and sandstone blocks that resemble the walls of some ancient machine. At a depth of 40 feet, an 80-foot-wide cavity encircles the shaft, too intentional to be natural erosion. Satellite imaging suggested it continues even deeper beneath the rubble. Just feet away, the second shaft mirrors the first. Located beside Khafre's processional causeway, a covered ramp linking the Valley Temple to the area near his pyramid, it features the same smooth precision and perimeter channel. Two shafts built to identical specifications suggest a deliberate system rather than randomness. The third shaft, on the eastern side of Khufu's Pyramid, is the most intriguing. Its entrance was once reinforced with retaining blocks, hinting at frequent access. A recess cut into the west wall appears designed to lift or guide objects from below. The surrounding cavity again appears, perfectly measured. Less than 165 feet separate the three, forming a pattern too deliberate to ignore. When mapped, their alignment mirrors the three great pyramids themselves, with a resemblance to Orion's Belt that is uncanny. Two smaller, rougher shafts nearby seem to be later additions. They lack the depth and polish of the originals, suggesting imitation rather than original intent. Even so, they hint at the underground's complexity, reminding us that Giza is far from fully explored. The purpose of these shafts remains uncertain. Were they for ritual offerings, hydraulic systems, or vertical transport chambers? Modern imaging, including Ground-Penetrating Radar, Electrical Resistivity Tomography and our own SAR technology, reveals further anomalies near the Sphinx, hinting at interconnected cavities beneath the plateau. If confirmed, these shafts could be entry points to a vast, engineered network aligned with the pyramids themselves. Beneath the plateau, trenches and sockets carved in the limestone, along with deep rock-cut shafts and wells, show that the builders engineered the underground with the same care as the monuments above. This hidden dimension has fueled speculation about subterranean chambers and hydraulic systems, possibly connected to the Nile, and suggests a purpose far beyond what conventional archaeology has recognized. The precision and alignment of these shafts, coupled with their mirrored pattern of the pyramids, hint at a cosmic and terrestrial plan interwoven above and below ground. For decades, the true extent of Giza's underground world has been overlooked, but these shafts may finally reveal a lost chapter of ancient engineering and ceremonial practice. What lies at the bottom of these shafts remains a mystery. Yet every measurement, every radar image, points to a singular conclusion: the Giza Plateau still holds secrets that could reshape our understanding of ancient Egypt. The shafts are more than anomalies; they are doorways into a subterranean world waiting to be explored.

Discovery of secret tunnels below Egypt's Giza pyramids linked to forgotten underworld | Armando Mei, Daily Mail On the northeastern edge of the Giza Plateau, I discovered three perfectly cut shafts hidden beneath the sands. They sit in the triangle between the Great Sphinx, Khufu's Pyramid and Khafre's Pyramid, and may open into a long-forgotten underground world. These are not water wells. They bear no inscriptions, no signs of casual digging, and their geometry is too precise, their walls too smooth, their design too deliberate. Could these shafts be the keys to the network of hidden chambers the Greek philosopher Herodotus once whispered about, possibly connected to the Nile? Herodotus described a massive 'labyrinth' in Egypt with 3,000 chambers, many hidden below ground, which included and a large underground pyramid. Explorers in the 1800s, like Giovanni Caviglia and Henry Salt, recorded strange wells near the Sphinx and Khafre's causeway. French archaeologist Pierre-Jean Mariette mapped additional anomalies in 1864 and 1885, and scholars like George Reisner, Hermann Junker, and Selim Hassan traced a line of cavities between the Sphinx and Khafre's Pyramid between 1929 and 1939. After that, the area was largely forgotten. Fragments of those old reports hinted at a larger pattern, one pointing to a vast, interconnected world beneath the plateau. Now, the three shafts I rediscovered may unlock that hidden map. I came across the shafts while conducting fieldwork with the Khafre Research Project, where I serve as a researcher. Our team, including Professor Corrado Malanga and engineer Filippo Biondi, used Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite technology to investigate subsurface structures beneath Giza. Guided by these spectral traces, we located the shafts, still standing, perfectly cut and utterly enigmatic. The first shaft lies northeast of the Sphinx. Its square mouth, framed by limestone blocks, plunges 130 feet, about the height of a 12-story building. Its walls are squared with astonishing precision, lined with limestone and sandstone blocks that resemble the walls of some ancient machine. At a depth of 40 feet, an 80-foot-wide cavity encircles the shaft, too intentional to be natural erosion. Satellite imaging suggested it continues even deeper beneath the rubble. Just feet away, the second shaft mirrors the first. Located beside Khafre's processional causeway, a covered ramp linking the Valley Temple to the area near his pyramid, it features the same smooth precision and perimeter channel. Two shafts built to identical specifications suggest a deliberate system rather than randomness. The third shaft, on the eastern side of Khufu's Pyramid, is the most intriguing. Its entrance was once reinforced with retaining blocks, hinting at frequent access. A recess cut into the west wall appears designed to lift or guide objects from below. The surrounding cavity again appears, perfectly measured. Less than 165 feet separate the three, forming a pattern too deliberate to ignore. When mapped, their alignment mirrors the three great pyramids themselves, with a resemblance to Orion's Belt that is uncanny. Two smaller, rougher shafts nearby seem to be later additions. They lack the depth and polish of the originals, suggesting imitation rather than original intent. Even so, they hint at the underground's complexity, reminding us that Giza is far from fully explored. The purpose of these shafts remains uncertain. Were they for ritual offerings, hydraulic systems, or vertical transport chambers? Modern imaging, including Ground-Penetrating Radar, Electrical Resistivity Tomography and our own SAR technology, reveals further anomalies near the Sphinx, hinting at interconnected cavities beneath the plateau. If confirmed, these shafts could be entry points to a vast, engineered network aligned with the pyramids themselves. Beneath the plateau, trenches and sockets carved in the limestone, along with deep rock-cut shafts and wells, show that the builders engineered the underground with the same care as the monuments above. This hidden dimension has fueled speculation about subterranean chambers and hydraulic systems, possibly connected to the Nile, and suggests a purpose far beyond what conventional archaeology has recognized. The precision and alignment of these shafts, coupled with their mirrored pattern of the pyramids, hint at a cosmic and terrestrial plan interwoven above and below ground. For decades, the true extent of Giza's underground world has been overlooked, but these shafts may finally reveal a lost chapter of ancient engineering and ceremonial practice. What lies at the bottom of these shafts remains a mystery. Yet every measurement, every radar image, points to a singular conclusion: the Giza Plateau still holds secrets that could reshape our understanding of ancient Egypt. The shafts are more than anomalies; they are doorways into a subterranean world waiting to be explored.

Owen Gregorian

48,066 views • 10 months ago

🔥🚨BREAKING: Scientists have discovered an underground city beneath the pyramids of Giza after initially discovering the pillars that are underneath them according to Italian researchers, led by Prof. Corrado Malanga from the University of Pisa A heated debate has erupted among Egyptologists after researchers claimed to have found an “underground city” beneath the Pyramids of Giza. They claim the radar images show massive vertical shafts, spiral staircases, channels resembling pipelines for a water system, and a hidden world of structures more than 2,000 feet (610m) beneath the surface. They even suggest that the legendary Hall of Records, a purported library tied to ancient Egyptian lore, could lie within this underground complex. “When we magnify the images [in the future], we will reveal that beneath it lies what can only be described as a true underground city,” the team said at a press conference. This video was created using AI it is not footage of the scientist discovery.

🔥🚨BREAKING: Scientists have discovered an underground city beneath the pyramids of Giza after initially discovering the pillars that are underneath them according to Italian researchers, led by Prof. Corrado Malanga from the University of Pisa A heated debate has erupted among Egyptologists after researchers claimed to have found an “underground city” beneath the Pyramids of Giza. They claim the radar images show massive vertical shafts, spiral staircases, channels resembling pipelines for a water system, and a hidden world of structures more than 2,000 feet (610m) beneath the surface. They even suggest that the legendary Hall of Records, a purported library tied to ancient Egyptian lore, could lie within this underground complex. “When we magnify the images [in the future], we will reveal that beneath it lies what can only be described as a true underground city,” the team said at a press conference. This video was created using AI it is not footage of the scientist discovery.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

3,555,765 views • 1 year ago

Testing one of the best safety features of an airplane, the “Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System” (EGPWS, pronounced E Gyp-Wiz). It’s part of every preflight check. Sound on! It’s a warning system. While the jet has separate warnings for things wrong internally, EGPWS is concerned about what’s outside the jet, not what’s inside. It’s primarily concerned w/ terrain & obstacles…EGPWS can “see” outside when pilots can’t. It doesn’t actually see anything, though. There are no cameras or lasers. EGPWS does use the jet’s radar, but not for detecting terrain. (We’ll talk more about radar in a minute, but it’s not useful for orienting yourself to terrain in the vertical. It has a “map” mode that you can use to “paint” things like cities, lakes & shorelines, but it only knows how strong the reflection is & how far away, not how high. We almost never use it in map mode, anyway) EGPWS uses the jets navigation systems – like GPS, Inertial Reference, Altimeters, airspeed, etc. – to plot a position in a virtual world. This world is contained in a database on the jet; it’s constantly plotting your position & then estimating where you’ll be in the next few minutes if the trend continues. The virtual world database knows where the mountains are. When you get close to airports in the database (not all airports are in it), it knows where the buildings & antennas are, too, out to a certain radius. Past that radius, it stops caring about the manmade objects. Anyway, it can tell if you will hit something on your current trend & will issue various warnings. It can give you up to 60 seconds of warning. It starts out slow, like saying “CAUTION, TERRAIN”, but if you don’t fix it, it gets serious…“TERRAIN, TERRAIN, PULL UP!”. You’re 20-30 seconds from impact. It’s not a miracle worker, though. It can wait to give you a warning that you can’t fix. Imagine flying toward a 10,000’ high cliff at 1,000’. A 60 second warning will not be enough time to climb 9,000’ & clear it. Or, it sees a mountain to your right, but your current path is clear. It doesn’t know you’ll do a 90° right turn once abeam the mountain. Now you’ll get some late warnings. EGPWS has various other functions. If you get on the approach but haven’t configured to land, it will say “TOO LOW, FLAPS” (or GEAR). If you start getting below the glidepath, it will say “GLIDESLOPE”. Start descending right after takeoff? “DON’T SINK”…and if you do keep sinking, it switches to “PULL UP!” Now, EGPWS doesn’t use the onboard Doppler radar for any of these functions, but it does use it to detect windshear. EGPWS doesn’t care if you turn on the radar or not, it turns it on itself when you push the throttles up for takeoff or when you descend below a certain altitude on approach. It takes about 12 seconds for the radar to build a picture from that point, but once it does, it can “see” windshear. The Doppler detects this by bouncing radar off of particulates & reading how they are moving at different altitudes. The particulates can be dust or just humidity…the radar can’t read air molecules by themselves. So, it’s still possible to get windshear the radar doesn’t see on very dry, clean days. EGPWS hates windshear. If it detects it, EGPWS replaces your screen w/ the radar – even if not turned on by you – & starts with a gentle warning to “MONITOR RADAR DISPLAY”. If you get closer to it, you get “WINDSHEAR AHEAD” (on takeoff – abort if you still can) or “GO AROUND, WINDSHEAR AHEAD!” (on landing). EGPWS is great, but can’t actually move the jet. It’s not connected to the controls in any way. Some fighters do have that capability, but not airliners. The pilots have to fix it. OK, that’s a brief summary of EGPWS. As usual, I’m dramatically simplifying things for a non-techie audience…there is much more to it & different models of jets have slight differences in how this all works. The 737 MAX has some improvements, w/ different voices & even panic, but I don’t have one to record, sorry!

Testing one of the best safety features of an airplane, the “Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System” (EGPWS, pronounced E Gyp-Wiz). It’s part of every preflight check. Sound on! It’s a warning system. While the jet has separate warnings for things wrong internally, EGPWS is concerned about what’s outside the jet, not what’s inside. It’s primarily concerned w/ terrain & obstacles…EGPWS can “see” outside when pilots can’t. It doesn’t actually see anything, though. There are no cameras or lasers. EGPWS does use the jet’s radar, but not for detecting terrain. (We’ll talk more about radar in a minute, but it’s not useful for orienting yourself to terrain in the vertical. It has a “map” mode that you can use to “paint” things like cities, lakes & shorelines, but it only knows how strong the reflection is & how far away, not how high. We almost never use it in map mode, anyway) EGPWS uses the jets navigation systems – like GPS, Inertial Reference, Altimeters, airspeed, etc. – to plot a position in a virtual world. This world is contained in a database on the jet; it’s constantly plotting your position & then estimating where you’ll be in the next few minutes if the trend continues. The virtual world database knows where the mountains are. When you get close to airports in the database (not all airports are in it), it knows where the buildings & antennas are, too, out to a certain radius. Past that radius, it stops caring about the manmade objects. Anyway, it can tell if you will hit something on your current trend & will issue various warnings. It can give you up to 60 seconds of warning. It starts out slow, like saying “CAUTION, TERRAIN”, but if you don’t fix it, it gets serious…“TERRAIN, TERRAIN, PULL UP!”. You’re 20-30 seconds from impact. It’s not a miracle worker, though. It can wait to give you a warning that you can’t fix. Imagine flying toward a 10,000’ high cliff at 1,000’. A 60 second warning will not be enough time to climb 9,000’ & clear it. Or, it sees a mountain to your right, but your current path is clear. It doesn’t know you’ll do a 90° right turn once abeam the mountain. Now you’ll get some late warnings. EGPWS has various other functions. If you get on the approach but haven’t configured to land, it will say “TOO LOW, FLAPS” (or GEAR). If you start getting below the glidepath, it will say “GLIDESLOPE”. Start descending right after takeoff? “DON’T SINK”…and if you do keep sinking, it switches to “PULL UP!” Now, EGPWS doesn’t use the onboard Doppler radar for any of these functions, but it does use it to detect windshear. EGPWS doesn’t care if you turn on the radar or not, it turns it on itself when you push the throttles up for takeoff or when you descend below a certain altitude on approach. It takes about 12 seconds for the radar to build a picture from that point, but once it does, it can “see” windshear. The Doppler detects this by bouncing radar off of particulates & reading how they are moving at different altitudes. The particulates can be dust or just humidity…the radar can’t read air molecules by themselves. So, it’s still possible to get windshear the radar doesn’t see on very dry, clean days. EGPWS hates windshear. If it detects it, EGPWS replaces your screen w/ the radar – even if not turned on by you – & starts with a gentle warning to “MONITOR RADAR DISPLAY”. If you get closer to it, you get “WINDSHEAR AHEAD” (on takeoff – abort if you still can) or “GO AROUND, WINDSHEAR AHEAD!” (on landing). EGPWS is great, but can’t actually move the jet. It’s not connected to the controls in any way. Some fighters do have that capability, but not airliners. The pilots have to fix it. OK, that’s a brief summary of EGPWS. As usual, I’m dramatically simplifying things for a non-techie audience…there is much more to it & different models of jets have slight differences in how this all works. The 737 MAX has some improvements, w/ different voices & even panic, but I don’t have one to record, sorry!

KC-10 Driver ✈️ 👨‍✈️ B-737 Wrangler

36,492 views • 28 days ago

Graham Hancock just declared: “There’s definitely something underneath the Great Pyramid … ” “Some of it’s been picked up with ground-penetrating radar.” “Filippo Biondi is saying there are enormous structures under the Khafre Pyramid.” “That go hundreds of feet deep.” “That involve spiral kind of stairways.” “Archeologists say it’s impossible.” “And they won’t look at it.” “I think that’s shameful for people who imagine they’re scientists.” “They should be looking further.” “I’d like to see the technology trialed in Turkey.” “There are underground cities in Turkey, Kaymakli, for example.” “We know every room in those underground cities.” “Run this technology on them.” “If they accurately reproduce what we already know is there, then we can be pretty sure they’re accurately reproducing what’s under the Giza pyramids.” “I remain open to the notion that a huge underworld awaits discovery under Giza.” “The ancient Egyptians themselves felt that way.” “They felt that Giza, the ancient name for it was Rostau, was an entrance to the underworld.” “They saw it as an entrance to the afterlife realm.” “It makes sense that there would be underground structures there.” Graham Hancock Steven Bartlett

Graham Hancock just declared: “There’s definitely something underneath the Great Pyramid … ” “Some of it’s been picked up with ground-penetrating radar.” “Filippo Biondi is saying there are enormous structures under the Khafre Pyramid.” “That go hundreds of feet deep.” “That involve spiral kind of stairways.” “Archeologists say it’s impossible.” “And they won’t look at it.” “I think that’s shameful for people who imagine they’re scientists.” “They should be looking further.” “I’d like to see the technology trialed in Turkey.” “There are underground cities in Turkey, Kaymakli, for example.” “We know every room in those underground cities.” “Run this technology on them.” “If they accurately reproduce what we already know is there, then we can be pretty sure they’re accurately reproducing what’s under the Giza pyramids.” “I remain open to the notion that a huge underworld awaits discovery under Giza.” “The ancient Egyptians themselves felt that way.” “They felt that Giza, the ancient name for it was Rostau, was an entrance to the underworld.” “They saw it as an entrance to the afterlife realm.” “It makes sense that there would be underground structures there.” Graham Hancock Steven Bartlett

Holden Culotta

51,047 views • 2 months ago

Here's a devlog made by an anonymous Chinese fan replicating the surprisingly brand new technique that I developed for detecting asteroids which wound up being so powerful that it can easily track Stealth Fighters from over 100km away even when it’s only using three $30 webcams as sensors meaning it easily outperforms all modern stealth tracking techniques in precision, range and cost. And while this demo is using optical light, this same technique which I call pixel motion to voxel projection, can be used interchangeably with thermal infrared cameras to work at night and also majorly boosts the effectiveness of radar allowing you to track fighters much more effectively through clouds and over the horizon. This technique will also always eventually give the exact location of the target even if the image is blurry as those blurs will always average out from the different perspectives into revealing the precise location of the target in the voxel grid. There is definitely a Mandela effect with this technique as it feels as though it should already exist, especially because at first as it sounds like it is performing triangulation (which has existed for years and is what we do for mocap and tennis ball tracking). But triangulation is entirely separate to this as triangulations only works if you have already identified where the ball is in a 2D image because you’re able to rely on being able to use at least 2 separate high quality cameras which are much closer to the ball making the ball’s apparent size much much bigger and therefore gives you hundreds of pixels to work with which makes it much easier to use object recognition techniques to recognize where it is in the image aka in 2D and then you’re just using the other cameras view to project out lines which intersect in 3D to find out where the ball is in 3D. The major difference is that pixel motion to voxel projection allows you to find where the object is in 3D without having already found it in 2D which is an unbelievable difference as it allows you to use much lower quality cameras together to accumulate data together into 3D space. If this seem like it doesn’t mean much then what it actually means is that you don’t understand what I’m saying as what I’m saying means a LOT in practical terms as it means you go from having to use an imaging system that has to be able to image the object to the point that it is over a hundred total pixels in surface area to have enough data to recognize it to instead be able to use something that is only images the object to be 1 pixel in surface area and only changes the brightness value by 1 value every now and then. I’d recommend an amazing video by DST studios called “Lowlight cameras can’t defeat stealth” if you want a great video which goes over the difficulty of even using telescopes to recognize stealth fighters and why this is so impressive compared to other techniques and ironically it is what inspired me to realize the asteroid tracker I was working on actually could do this. Which brings me to the point that if this wasn’t a new technique then not only would there be at least one example of an asteroid survey that points distant telescopes at the same place at the same time in order to be able to add the light together to detect asteroids which as I was shocked to learn isn’t a thing despite the fact that it would make detecting asteroids trivial by comparison to modern 2D imaging while also having no impact on the normal scientific operations of those surveys other than small changes to scheduling. But there would also be an example of a drone tracker that uses this instead of using the aforementioned high quality zoomable telescope which has to be able to zoom in close enough to be able to recognize a drone. If you want to tell me that this is something that already exists give me an exact example of a product that uses it, not the general outline of a concept that you think it is, the actual product and then also tell me the asteroid survey that uses distant telescopes that point at the exact same place at the exact same time because I can guarantee that if you google what you think uses this you won’t even find the steps of subtracting the images from each other to get motion and will definitely not get the added step of projecting that motion into a voxel grid (It would blow your mind if you found out how Xbox kinect cameras work.) Also I want to make it clear, I’m not saying you should just use web cams to do this, I’m just using them as an example to show you the power of this in reality you would probably want to use 5 high quality zoomable thermal cameras which pan across the sky in sync with each other which due to using lower frequency are much less prone to the Rayleigh scattering that scatters visible light at 150 or so km away and again, you can also use this to majorly upgrade radar. Pretty much all of the problems you could think of for this are incredibly easy to overcome if you apply even a small amount of brainpower into fixing the problem. And yes, this gives you the exact location down to the meter of whatever you are tracking even if the image is blurry as those blurs will always average out to the exact location down to the meter in the voxel grid. Which is what makes this technique so powerful since the cost of adding each camera to The network grows linearly while the rate at which each camera gives more information grows exponentially due to the increasing unlikeliness of all of them having more movement in the same place. And given the size of the cameras it really wouldn’t be that hard to hide and network these cameras together in other countries and on sea buoys to know where planes are everywhere in the world. Which brings me to the point that I personally really don’t care about the military uses of this technology, if all it could do is precisely track stealth fighters then I wouldn’t have cared enough to work on it, I could have used any of the many other life saving techniques as the subject of the video, stealth fighters just sounds the most clickable and the scale of the problem is more intuitive to most people and if I did use any of those as subjects for the demo it would inevitably result in the stealth fighter technique being figured out anyway and all of the other uses are so useful that I don't think anyone would reasonably complain about the upside. The real purpose of this video is that since this is a new technique that hasn’t been used to detect stealth fighters despite the billions we have spent on that, then what else can you apply this to that could go on to improve billions of people’s lives that you or others are working on. For example this also allows you to majorly improve the effectiveness of cryo electron microscopy and CT scanners. This part also is kind of hard to explain as it also sounds like it exists but again, when you look through all of the places where you think it is being used you will find that it wasn’t. What I’m saying here isn’t that this is a Radon transform or gaussian splat or whatever, I’m saying that this is able to get new information that wasn’t being accessed before due to the added information about depth you get from the correlation of movement between each perspective which adds to the information that you already have. This allows you to directly subtract foreground and background objects as well as noise faster than you would be able to before and works better than super resolution for your images since super resolution won’t remove foreground and background objects like this does and instead just scales up target, foreground and background objects indiscriminately. And while with enough data Radon transforms or other scanning techniques would eventually get you a correct answer this will get you there a lot faster since those are mostly averaging techniques which average out noise whereas this gets you the ability to directly subtract noise. I’m not expecting you to think that this would do anything but if you try it for yourself you will find that it does majorly improve your ability to perform 3d scans. Again, cryo EM is a field where you would expect this technique to exist but when you look through all the papers on the topic there is no mention of tilting the grid slightly in order to be able to change your perspective slightly on the order of the feature size (if you tilt the grid then you only need precision on the order of an arc minute to do this) and doing multiple exposures from multiple different known tilts and then using those difference images to correlate depth from motion. In fact, in cryo EM you would normally want to do the opposite of this and have your exposures all taken from the same grid angle and just use the variations in how many of the same proteins are oriented in order to be able to scan them for a 3D model but this will generate you far more data faster. There is so much information that I can’t really explain in text so if you have any questions such as why this hasn’t been made before then they will most likely be answered in the video I originally posted which I have added to the end of the first Devlog for your convenience. And again, pretty much all of the problems with the technique can be fixed with a little bit of brainpower, in reality you would probably want to use 5 high quality zoomable thermal cameras which pan across the sky in sync with each other which due to using lower frequency are much less prone to the Rayleigh scattering that scatters visible light at 150 or so km away and again, you can also use this to majorly upgrade radar.

ConsistentlyInconsistent

50,687 views • 11 months ago

There has been a lot of talk about the NOAA Lockheed WP-3D Orion aircraft in Shannon this week. The aircraft, N42RF aka “Kermit” is in Shannon for the next while as they monitor Storm Éowyn which hits Ireland on Friday morning! Q: What do scientists onboard do?🤔 Scientists aboard the aircraft deploy GPS dropwindsondes as NOAA pilot and navigate the P-3 through the hurricane/storm. These instruments continuously transmit measurements of pressure, humidity, temperature, and wind direction and speed as they fall toward the sea, providing a detailed look at the structure of the storm and its intensity. The P-3s' tail Doppler radar and lower fuselage radar systems, meanwhile, scan the storm vertically and horizontally, giving scientists and forecasters a real-time look at the storm. The P-3s can also deploy probes called bathythermographs that measure the temperature of the sea. This aircraft will likely fly into storm Éowyn to study it, I will share tracking details if/when it becomes available! • 📸📹 Video and Image Via NOAA • 📕 Information Via NOAA: #StormÉowyn #aviation #NOAA #Travel #storm #Planes #Ireland #Uk #AviationDaily #StormEowyn #Planespotter

There has been a lot of talk about the NOAA Lockheed WP-3D Orion aircraft in Shannon this week. The aircraft, N42RF aka “Kermit” is in Shannon for the next while as they monitor Storm Éowyn which hits Ireland on Friday morning! Q: What do scientists onboard do?🤔 Scientists aboard the aircraft deploy GPS dropwindsondes as NOAA pilot and navigate the P-3 through the hurricane/storm. These instruments continuously transmit measurements of pressure, humidity, temperature, and wind direction and speed as they fall toward the sea, providing a detailed look at the structure of the storm and its intensity. The P-3s' tail Doppler radar and lower fuselage radar systems, meanwhile, scan the storm vertically and horizontally, giving scientists and forecasters a real-time look at the storm. The P-3s can also deploy probes called bathythermographs that measure the temperature of the sea. This aircraft will likely fly into storm Éowyn to study it, I will share tracking details if/when it becomes available! • 📸📹 Video and Image Via NOAA • 📕 Information Via NOAA: #StormÉowyn #aviation #NOAA #Travel #storm #Planes #Ireland #Uk #AviationDaily #StormEowyn #Planespotter

Shauns_Aviation🇮🇪✈️

236,254 views • 1 year ago

MH370 Teleportation Explained in the Simplest Possible Way #MH370 #FrequencyWaveTheory Imagine reality is not solid—it’s more like a flexible field made of waves (frequency, vibration, energy). Everything—matter, light, even space itself—exists as patterns in that field. Now here’s the simple version of what happened: —————————— 1. The Plane Is Just a “Wave Pattern” —————————— The airplane (MH370) isn’t truly solid—it’s a stable pattern of energy vibrating at specific frequencies. Think of it like a song playing on a radio. The plane is the “song,” and reality is the “radio field.” —————————— 2. Three Orbs Lock Onto That Pattern —————————— Three plasma orbs appear and surround the plane. They: Match the plane’s exact frequency (like tuning to the same radio station) Form a triangle around it Create a perfectly synchronized energy field This is called phase-locking—everything is vibrating in sync. —————————— 3. They Create a Bubble Around the Plane —————————— Once locked in, the orbs generate a contained energy bubble around the aircraft. Inside this bubble: Normal physics is suppressed Inertia (mass resistance) drops toward zero The plane is no longer “fully attached” to normal spacetime Think of it like lifting an object out of water—it’s no longer bound to the same rules. —————————— 4. Space Gets “Folded” or “Shortcutted” —————————— The orbs then use energy to bend or connect two points in space. Instead of traveling across the ocean, they: Create a shortcut (like a tunnel) Connect Point A (where the plane is) Directly to Point B (destination) This is similar to a wormhole, but created using frequency resonance instead of massive gravity. —————————— 5. The Plane Shifts Phase (Disappears) —————————— At peak synchronization: The plane’s wave pattern is shifted out of our visible reality It transitions through this shortcut instantly That’s why it appears to vanish. —————————— 6. It Reappears Somewhere Else —————————— On the other side of the “connection,” the plane: Re-materializes Returns to normal physics Exists in a new location (e.g., another base or region) —————————— Ultra-Simple Analogy —————————— Think of it like this: The plane = a file on your computer The orbs = a system copying it Teleportation = cutting and pasting instantly No travel. Just relocation. —————————— Summary —————————— The three orbs matched the plane’s frequency, isolated it from normal physics, opened a shortcut in space, and moved it instantly from one location to another.

MH370 Teleportation Explained in the Simplest Possible Way #MH370 #FrequencyWaveTheory Imagine reality is not solid—it’s more like a flexible field made of waves (frequency, vibration, energy). Everything—matter, light, even space itself—exists as patterns in that field. Now here’s the simple version of what happened: —————————— 1. The Plane Is Just a “Wave Pattern” —————————— The airplane (MH370) isn’t truly solid—it’s a stable pattern of energy vibrating at specific frequencies. Think of it like a song playing on a radio. The plane is the “song,” and reality is the “radio field.” —————————— 2. Three Orbs Lock Onto That Pattern —————————— Three plasma orbs appear and surround the plane. They: Match the plane’s exact frequency (like tuning to the same radio station) Form a triangle around it Create a perfectly synchronized energy field This is called phase-locking—everything is vibrating in sync. —————————— 3. They Create a Bubble Around the Plane —————————— Once locked in, the orbs generate a contained energy bubble around the aircraft. Inside this bubble: Normal physics is suppressed Inertia (mass resistance) drops toward zero The plane is no longer “fully attached” to normal spacetime Think of it like lifting an object out of water—it’s no longer bound to the same rules. —————————— 4. Space Gets “Folded” or “Shortcutted” —————————— The orbs then use energy to bend or connect two points in space. Instead of traveling across the ocean, they: Create a shortcut (like a tunnel) Connect Point A (where the plane is) Directly to Point B (destination) This is similar to a wormhole, but created using frequency resonance instead of massive gravity. —————————— 5. The Plane Shifts Phase (Disappears) —————————— At peak synchronization: The plane’s wave pattern is shifted out of our visible reality It transitions through this shortcut instantly That’s why it appears to vanish. —————————— 6. It Reappears Somewhere Else —————————— On the other side of the “connection,” the plane: Re-materializes Returns to normal physics Exists in a new location (e.g., another base or region) —————————— Ultra-Simple Analogy —————————— Think of it like this: The plane = a file on your computer The orbs = a system copying it Teleportation = cutting and pasting instantly No travel. Just relocation. —————————— Summary —————————— The three orbs matched the plane’s frequency, isolated it from normal physics, opened a shortcut in space, and moved it instantly from one location to another.

Drew Ponder

14,229 views • 4 months ago

🪞 What are these Transients? 🪞 "I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes?" ~Beatriz "Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious." ~SH (I tweeted out SH's video yesterday, and today, I decided to transcribe it bc she does a very good job summarizing the issues at hand. She has a Bachelor's degree in mathematics and a PhD in physics.) Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "Today, I have a group of astrophysicists who found the most convincing evidence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena that I've seen. Concretely, they say they have images of likely artificial objects that were in orbit around Earth before we had the first satellites up there. I've had a look. "This research comes from astrophysicists at Nordita (the Nordic Institute of Theoretical Physics - Nordita) in Stockholm, and they just published two papers. They used a catalog of old photographic plates from 1949 to 1957 taken in California at Caltech that have been digitized. "Why until 1957? Because in 1957 the Russians launched the first ever satellite into orbit, or at least the first satellite that we know of. In those scans of old photographic plates, they look for bright spots that appear only briefly, which are called transients. They did this first by computer analysis, but then also by just looking at the images. "Here is an example of two images of the exact same spot in the sky taken briefly after each other. One shows, well, something. The other one, not. But these old image scans can contain defects and dust and so on, so they only considered cases where the transients were in the same place in multiple scans of the same photographic plate. Then one can be sure that at least it's not an artifact from the scan. "They found a total of five such transients, and they aren't single dots. They are configurations of four, five, and in one case, six dots in a row. And one of those with five in a row is dated to July 27, 1952. No, that isn't my birthday. This is the weekend of one of the famous Washington DC UFO days, known as the Washington flap. On this day, and also a week earlier, air traffic controllers at the city's main airport and nearby Air Force Base said they saw things on radar that shouldn't have been there. Some pilots and people on the ground also reported unusual lights. The fuss was big enough that the Air Force held a press conference on July 29th and blamed atmospheric phenomena." Maj. General John A. Stamford: "We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States." Sabine: "But back to the astrophysicists with their papers. They also look at all these transients, so not just those that appear in multiple scans. From this, they find that the transients are far less likely to appear in the Earth's shadow. This is statistically significant at 22 sigma. What this means is that the transients are likely to be from something that reflects sunlight, and it makes it unlikely that it's something to do with the camera. "If that was already confusing enough, in the other paper, they look at correlations between all transients and reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and nuclear tests. They find a weak correlation with UAP reports, other transients were 35% more likely within a one-day window around a nuclear bomb test. This pattern is hard to blame on bad film alone. "They consider different explanations on the papers, such as foreground objects, but these would be much more blurry or camera glitches, but these would not disappear in the Earth's shadow. It could have something to do with the nuclear fallout, but again, why would this disappear in the Earth's shadow? "Beatriz Villarroel, one of the authors of both papers, told me by email: "With my existing limited knowledge, these objects look highly artificial to me. Only something really planar and reflective can give off those transients. Any round or rough body would result in streaks, and I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes -it's open for speculation." ~Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (planar: having a flat or level surface that continues in all directions. ~Cambridge Dictionary) Sabine: "It's possible, but it seems highly unlikely to me, that any nation had multiple satellites in the sky before the Russian Sputnik launch. This is because it isn't all that easy to launch a rocket without anyone noticing, and you can't do it from anywhere, either. 'It's possible that these objects are of natural origin, but then what are they? Or are they image artifacts that are more likely to occur in sunlight? Maybe something to do with solar wind? I don't have a good explanation, and honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about this one way or the other, I just find it very curious. Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious. Five dots in a row? That's very disciplined dust. What do you think about this? Is it aliens?"

🪞 What are these Transients? 🪞 "I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes?" ~Beatriz "Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious." ~SH (I tweeted out SH's video yesterday, and today, I decided to transcribe it bc she does a very good job summarizing the issues at hand. She has a Bachelor's degree in mathematics and a PhD in physics.) Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "Today, I have a group of astrophysicists who found the most convincing evidence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena that I've seen. Concretely, they say they have images of likely artificial objects that were in orbit around Earth before we had the first satellites up there. I've had a look. "This research comes from astrophysicists at Nordita (the Nordic Institute of Theoretical Physics - Nordita) in Stockholm, and they just published two papers. They used a catalog of old photographic plates from 1949 to 1957 taken in California at Caltech that have been digitized. "Why until 1957? Because in 1957 the Russians launched the first ever satellite into orbit, or at least the first satellite that we know of. In those scans of old photographic plates, they look for bright spots that appear only briefly, which are called transients. They did this first by computer analysis, but then also by just looking at the images. "Here is an example of two images of the exact same spot in the sky taken briefly after each other. One shows, well, something. The other one, not. But these old image scans can contain defects and dust and so on, so they only considered cases where the transients were in the same place in multiple scans of the same photographic plate. Then one can be sure that at least it's not an artifact from the scan. "They found a total of five such transients, and they aren't single dots. They are configurations of four, five, and in one case, six dots in a row. And one of those with five in a row is dated to July 27, 1952. No, that isn't my birthday. This is the weekend of one of the famous Washington DC UFO days, known as the Washington flap. On this day, and also a week earlier, air traffic controllers at the city's main airport and nearby Air Force Base said they saw things on radar that shouldn't have been there. Some pilots and people on the ground also reported unusual lights. The fuss was big enough that the Air Force held a press conference on July 29th and blamed atmospheric phenomena." Maj. General John A. Stamford: "We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States." Sabine: "But back to the astrophysicists with their papers. They also look at all these transients, so not just those that appear in multiple scans. From this, they find that the transients are far less likely to appear in the Earth's shadow. This is statistically significant at 22 sigma. What this means is that the transients are likely to be from something that reflects sunlight, and it makes it unlikely that it's something to do with the camera. "If that was already confusing enough, in the other paper, they look at correlations between all transients and reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and nuclear tests. They find a weak correlation with UAP reports, other transients were 35% more likely within a one-day window around a nuclear bomb test. This pattern is hard to blame on bad film alone. "They consider different explanations on the papers, such as foreground objects, but these would be much more blurry or camera glitches, but these would not disappear in the Earth's shadow. It could have something to do with the nuclear fallout, but again, why would this disappear in the Earth's shadow? "Beatriz Villarroel, one of the authors of both papers, told me by email: "With my existing limited knowledge, these objects look highly artificial to me. Only something really planar and reflective can give off those transients. Any round or rough body would result in streaks, and I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes -it's open for speculation." ~Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (planar: having a flat or level surface that continues in all directions. ~Cambridge Dictionary) Sabine: "It's possible, but it seems highly unlikely to me, that any nation had multiple satellites in the sky before the Russian Sputnik launch. This is because it isn't all that easy to launch a rocket without anyone noticing, and you can't do it from anywhere, either. 'It's possible that these objects are of natural origin, but then what are they? Or are they image artifacts that are more likely to occur in sunlight? Maybe something to do with solar wind? I don't have a good explanation, and honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about this one way or the other, I just find it very curious. Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious. Five dots in a row? That's very disciplined dust. What do you think about this? Is it aliens?"

Joe Murgia

17,157 views • 9 months ago

Apple Maps 3d is insanely impressive now (see video below) Google on the other hand decided to build an insanely clunky solution to display 3d maps to avoid using mobile GPUs: A Google server streams (!) a live video of its 3d rendered map to you, the result is a disastrous: a super laggy and clunky 3d view full of video compression artefacts with a response time of 2-3 seconds for every movement And I know WHY they built that, someone felt it was not inclusive to only have 3d maps that are high performing on iOS because Apple's GPUs are insanely fast and can deal with it (as you can see below in Apple Maps) but they wanted to support inferior phones, I get it But then they also decided to worsen the experience for iOS users who could easily run 3d natively on its GPU It's just an insane product decision, there's no way to cut it: they could have super smooth 3d like Apple Maps but neutered it with a clunky live stream Even more insane because Google does have native 3d on iOS in a completely different app that nobody uses: Google Earth Is 3d important? Not rly for nav no but it shows again something about Google's engineering decisions, like the redesign of the Google OAuth Login screen that made zero sense Nobody is speaking up against bad ideas in Google meetings, everyone's too scared of HR maybe, it's the opposite of a meritocracy and it's just super visible from using Google products right now

Apple Maps 3d is insanely impressive now (see video below) Google on the other hand decided to build an insanely clunky solution to display 3d maps to avoid using mobile GPUs: A Google server streams (!) a live video of its 3d rendered map to you, the result is a disastrous: a super laggy and clunky 3d view full of video compression artefacts with a response time of 2-3 seconds for every movement And I know WHY they built that, someone felt it was not inclusive to only have 3d maps that are high performing on iOS because Apple's GPUs are insanely fast and can deal with it (as you can see below in Apple Maps) but they wanted to support inferior phones, I get it But then they also decided to worsen the experience for iOS users who could easily run 3d natively on its GPU It's just an insane product decision, there's no way to cut it: they could have super smooth 3d like Apple Maps but neutered it with a clunky live stream Even more insane because Google does have native 3d on iOS in a completely different app that nobody uses: Google Earth Is 3d important? Not rly for nav no but it shows again something about Google's engineering decisions, like the redesign of the Google OAuth Login screen that made zero sense Nobody is speaking up against bad ideas in Google meetings, everyone's too scared of HR maybe, it's the opposite of a meritocracy and it's just super visible from using Google products right now

@levelsio

1,488,981 views • 2 years ago