Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

They couldn't ban Bitcoin. Every government that tried failed. So the question changed: if you can't ban it, can you just make it too heavy for ordinary people to carry? Rustin spent 3 days in a basement pulling the receipts on the code change, the money behind the developers... show more

Simply Bitcoin

157,162 subscribers

142,207 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 NEW: Elon Musk and Department of Government Efficiency expose that taxpayer money was spent renting out Caesars Palace and stadiums—for parties. "The computers at Treasury pay about $5 trillion per year. When payments are made, there was formerly not a budget code on there. So if a payment was made you didn't know what it was for." "There was a $4 billion COVID fund in the Department of Education. There was no receipts recquired so people could just draw down on it. They found out money was being used to rent out Ceasers Palace for parties, rent out stadiums, etc." "So the one change that DOGE made was the simple requirement that if you drawdown money, you must first upload a receipt, and upon doing so, nobody drew down any money anymore." "Generally, the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen, and every year it gets bigger until they are literally renting out stadium."

🚨 NEW: Elon Musk and Department of Government Efficiency expose that taxpayer money was spent renting out Caesars Palace and stadiums—for parties. "The computers at Treasury pay about $5 trillion per year. When payments are made, there was formerly not a budget code on there. So if a payment was made you didn't know what it was for." "There was a $4 billion COVID fund in the Department of Education. There was no receipts recquired so people could just draw down on it. They found out money was being used to rent out Ceasers Palace for parties, rent out stadiums, etc." "So the one change that DOGE made was the simple requirement that if you drawdown money, you must first upload a receipt, and upon doing so, nobody drew down any money anymore." "Generally, the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen, and every year it gets bigger until they are literally renting out stadium."

KanekoaTheGreat

2,010,907 views • 1 year ago

If you start with price, you miss the point of Bitcoin. Most people overcomplicate Bitcoin because they start in the wrong place. A better question: Why does Bitcoin exist, and how could it improve our money system?

If you start with price, you miss the point of Bitcoin. Most people overcomplicate Bitcoin because they start in the wrong place. A better question: Why does Bitcoin exist, and how could it improve our money system?

Jordan Walker

21,534 views • 5 months ago

Months later, I was right and they are wrong!!! Just fix what your promised and stop the talking… When I tell you these NDC party and government are a scam, believe cos I know what I am talking about. A few weeks to elections, they together with their friends like Osagyefo Oliver Barker-Vormawor calling for a ban on small scale mining. I disagreed and I still disagree today cos I don’t think it’s a strategy that provides long term solution. The NPP government placed a 20months ban on small scale mining between April 2017 - December 2018, it worked temporarily until it was lifted and we went back to ground zero. Ban isn’t a sustainable strategy, it has been tried before and a new approach is needed. The NDC and their friends insisted the ban was the way to go and they went ahead to actually make a 120 day social contract with Ghanaians to ban small scale mining. Today, they are in government and the NDC are running away from the same thing they fought me on but insisted was the way to go. The people are simply calling on you to do as promised. Your call now! And Guess what, their political allies who were on streets for weeks in the name of freedom fighters and insisted on a ban are today demonstrating and no longer calling for the ban. Today, they are no more calling for a ban but baby sitting their Friends in Government and telling them to end Galamsey before their Presidential primaries. It’s 2025, and I have won the debate on the ban against small scale mining. If the NDC think it’s the way to go as they disagreed with me in the past, then they shld go ahead and implement the ban. The NDC have a founding history with enabling Galamsey and some of us knew it long ago, said it and it’s playing out in plain sight. Dear government, you asked for evidence and we have just served the evidence. Deal with Galamsey! #GalamseyEnablers

Months later, I was right and they are wrong!!! Just fix what your promised and stop the talking… When I tell you these NDC party and government are a scam, believe cos I know what I am talking about. A few weeks to elections, they together with their friends like Osagyefo Oliver Barker-Vormawor calling for a ban on small scale mining. I disagreed and I still disagree today cos I don’t think it’s a strategy that provides long term solution. The NPP government placed a 20months ban on small scale mining between April 2017 - December 2018, it worked temporarily until it was lifted and we went back to ground zero. Ban isn’t a sustainable strategy, it has been tried before and a new approach is needed. The NDC and their friends insisted the ban was the way to go and they went ahead to actually make a 120 day social contract with Ghanaians to ban small scale mining. Today, they are in government and the NDC are running away from the same thing they fought me on but insisted was the way to go. The people are simply calling on you to do as promised. Your call now! And Guess what, their political allies who were on streets for weeks in the name of freedom fighters and insisted on a ban are today demonstrating and no longer calling for the ban. Today, they are no more calling for a ban but baby sitting their Friends in Government and telling them to end Galamsey before their Presidential primaries. It’s 2025, and I have won the debate on the ban against small scale mining. If the NDC think it’s the way to go as they disagreed with me in the past, then they shld go ahead and implement the ban. The NDC have a founding history with enabling Galamsey and some of us knew it long ago, said it and it’s playing out in plain sight. Dear government, you asked for evidence and we have just served the evidence. Deal with Galamsey! #GalamseyEnablers

Dennis Edward Aboagye

26,962 views • 10 months ago

Reporter: Why did the government spend so much money on Mandir? Was it that necessary? Jaggi Guru: It is not the government money. There is trust formed by the public. And money collected through that is spent on Mandir construction. You can check the account. Reporter: But the trust could have built schools and hospitals. Jaggi: You could also build, or the people who say so, can also build. They can build a hospital, or even a graveyard. Now Mandir is a necessity, so here it is. 🙏

Reporter: Why did the government spend so much money on Mandir? Was it that necessary? Jaggi Guru: It is not the government money. There is trust formed by the public. And money collected through that is spent on Mandir construction. You can check the account. Reporter: But the trust could have built schools and hospitals. Jaggi: You could also build, or the people who say so, can also build. They can build a hospital, or even a graveyard. Now Mandir is a necessity, so here it is. 🙏

Usha

178,484 views • 2 years ago

🇺🇸TUCKER: I DON'T CARE IF THE CIA CREATED BITCOIN "Crypto people aren't just in it to make a buck; they're in it to change the world forever. These are not shallow people. These are people who can answer every single question except who was Satoshi. Obviously, it was the CIA. It's like Signal; they got there first." Source: TCN

🇺🇸TUCKER: I DON'T CARE IF THE CIA CREATED BITCOIN "Crypto people aren't just in it to make a buck; they're in it to change the world forever. These are not shallow people. These are people who can answer every single question except who was Satoshi. Obviously, it was the CIA. It's like Signal; they got there first." Source: TCN

Mario Nawfal

151,939 views • 2 years ago

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.

Santiago

64,425 views • 8 months ago

🚨 LMFAO! President Trump is BODYING reporters in the Oval Office "Who are you with?" REPORTER: MSNOW TRUMP: MSNOW? What a TERRIBLE show that is! They have the WORST people on that show. MSNOW...that's the FAILED MSDNC, right? The failed, they gave it a new name! You know why? Cause nobody watched it — and fewer people are watching it now! 🤣🤣

🚨 LMFAO! President Trump is BODYING reporters in the Oval Office "Who are you with?" REPORTER: MSNOW TRUMP: MSNOW? What a TERRIBLE show that is! They have the WORST people on that show. MSNOW...that's the FAILED MSDNC, right? The failed, they gave it a new name! You know why? Cause nobody watched it — and fewer people are watching it now! 🤣🤣

Eric Daugherty

27,113 views • 2 days ago

The Creator of Claude Code, Boris Cherny, just explained why most developers are likely to leak every secret they have. If it happened to the people who built Claude, it's probably already happening to you. Watch it, then grab the .gitignore template below👇

The Creator of Claude Code, Boris Cherny, just explained why most developers are likely to leak every secret they have. If it happened to the people who built Claude, it's probably already happening to you. Watch it, then grab the .gitignore template below👇

darkzodchi

42,377 views • 3 months ago

BJP's Shazia Ilmi on Kerala Story 2- ''If a film has been made in country under the freedom of expression, then how can you demand to ban it or ban it?''

BJP's Shazia Ilmi on Kerala Story 2- ''If a film has been made in country under the freedom of expression, then how can you demand to ban it or ban it?''

News Arena India

18,380 views • 5 months ago

Steve Jobs on why everything around you was made by people no smarter than you: "When you grow up, you tend to get told that the world is the way it is and your life is just to live your life inside the world. Try not to bash into the walls too much, have a nice family life, have fun, save a little money. But that's a very limited life." Steve believed most people live with a fundamental misconception. As he puts it: "Life can be much broader once you discover one simple fact. And that is—everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you." He continues: "And you can change it. You can influence it. You can build your own things that other people can use. And the minute that you understand that you can poke life and actually something will pop out the other side—that you can change it, you can mold it." On what matters most: "Maybe the most important thing is to shake off this erroneous notion that life is there and you're just going to live in it versus embrace it, change it, improve it, make your mark upon it. I think that's very important." His perspective on why you should change things: "However you learn that, once you learn it, you'll want to change life and make it better because it's kind of messed up in a lot of ways." The shift: "Once you learn that, you'll never be the same again."

Steve Jobs on why everything around you was made by people no smarter than you: "When you grow up, you tend to get told that the world is the way it is and your life is just to live your life inside the world. Try not to bash into the walls too much, have a nice family life, have fun, save a little money. But that's a very limited life." Steve believed most people live with a fundamental misconception. As he puts it: "Life can be much broader once you discover one simple fact. And that is—everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you." He continues: "And you can change it. You can influence it. You can build your own things that other people can use. And the minute that you understand that you can poke life and actually something will pop out the other side—that you can change it, you can mold it." On what matters most: "Maybe the most important thing is to shake off this erroneous notion that life is there and you're just going to live in it versus embrace it, change it, improve it, make your mark upon it. I think that's very important." His perspective on why you should change things: "However you learn that, once you learn it, you'll want to change life and make it better because it's kind of messed up in a lot of ways." The shift: "Once you learn that, you'll never be the same again."

Jaynit

48,518 views • 6 months ago

Being sidelined, getting dumped on, losing sleep. It's easy to always be negative in crypto, even if you have the money. If you can't change it, just do what you can do best. So, I took the money and invested it into a kindergarten. My name is Mikus, I am 20 years old. I made over $100k on Meteora and financed a kindergarten with the money. This is my story

Being sidelined, getting dumped on, losing sleep. It's easy to always be negative in crypto, even if you have the money. If you can't change it, just do what you can do best. So, I took the money and invested it into a kindergarten. My name is Mikus, I am 20 years old. I made over $100k on Meteora and financed a kindergarten with the money. This is my story

Mikus

40,115 views • 1 year ago

They once tried to ban bachata for being ‘too Black, too poor’ in the Dominican Republic, until a whitepassing musician made it popular in the 1980s. Now it fills stadiums worldwide 🌎🎶 Iamottob

They once tried to ban bachata for being ‘too Black, too poor’ in the Dominican Republic, until a whitepassing musician made it popular in the 1980s. Now it fills stadiums worldwide 🌎🎶 Iamottob

Jean Jacques Dessalines 🇭🇹🇵🇸🇳🇪🇲🇱🇧🇫🇨🇺

56,316 views • 11 months ago

Charlie Kirk wanted blockchain technology applied to the federal government. Full transparency. Every dime of spending tracked in real time on a public ledger. His framing was simple: "It is not the government's money. We are the sovereign. We earn the money and the government extracts it from us with our consent." If that's the relationship, then taxpayers have a right to see where every dollar goes. Day by day. Department by department. The technology already exists. Bitcoin proved a public, tamper-proof ledger works at global scale. Nobody can edit it after the fact. Nobody can hide a transaction. Apply that same infrastructure to federal spending and waste doesn't survive long. Nobody overspends when the ledger has an audience. The question was never whether we could do it. It's whether the people spending the money want you to see it.

Charlie Kirk wanted blockchain technology applied to the federal government. Full transparency. Every dime of spending tracked in real time on a public ledger. His framing was simple: "It is not the government's money. We are the sovereign. We earn the money and the government extracts it from us with our consent." If that's the relationship, then taxpayers have a right to see where every dollar goes. Day by day. Department by department. The technology already exists. Bitcoin proved a public, tamper-proof ledger works at global scale. Nobody can edit it after the fact. Nobody can hide a transaction. Apply that same infrastructure to federal spending and waste doesn't survive long. Nobody overspends when the ledger has an audience. The question was never whether we could do it. It's whether the people spending the money want you to see it.

Shadow Intel

311,134 views • 4 months ago

Charlie Kirk wanted blockchain technology applied to the federal government. Full transparency. Every dime of spending tracked in real time on a public ledger. His framing was simple: "It is not the government's money. We are the sovereign. We earn the money and the government extracts it from us with our consent." If that's the relationship, then taxpayers have a right to see where every dollar goes. Day by day. Department by department. The technology already exists. Bitcoin proved a public, tamper-proof ledger works at global scale. Nobody can edit it after the fact. Nobody can hide a transaction. Apply that same infrastructure to federal spending and waste doesn't survive long. Nobody overspends when the ledger has an audience. The question was never whether we could do it. It's whether the people spending the money want you to see it.

Charlie Kirk wanted blockchain technology applied to the federal government. Full transparency. Every dime of spending tracked in real time on a public ledger. His framing was simple: "It is not the government's money. We are the sovereign. We earn the money and the government extracts it from us with our consent." If that's the relationship, then taxpayers have a right to see where every dollar goes. Day by day. Department by department. The technology already exists. Bitcoin proved a public, tamper-proof ledger works at global scale. Nobody can edit it after the fact. Nobody can hide a transaction. Apply that same infrastructure to federal spending and waste doesn't survive long. Nobody overspends when the ledger has an audience. The question was never whether we could do it. It's whether the people spending the money want you to see it.

Shadow Intel

76,438 views • 4 months ago

The people pushing the digital Euro have admitted it openly — if people are allowed to opt out, it will fail. Nick Anthony breaks down what that actually means: they are proposing something nobody wants and planning to use government force to make sure you use it anyway. This is not a product competing in a free market. It is a system being imposed on people who have already made clear they would reject it if given the choice.

The people pushing the digital Euro have admitted it openly — if people are allowed to opt out, it will fail. Nick Anthony breaks down what that actually means: they are proposing something nobody wants and planning to use government force to make sure you use it anyway. This is not a product competing in a free market. It is a system being imposed on people who have already made clear they would reject it if given the choice.

Efrat Fenigson

16,720 views • 3 months ago

Charlie Kirk wanted blockchain technology applied to the federal government. Full transparency. Every dime of spending tracked in real time on a public ledger. His framing was simple: "It is not the government's money. We are the sovereign. We earn the money and the government extracts it from us with our consent." If that's the relationship, then taxpayers have a right to see where every dollar goes. Day by day. Department by department. The technology already exists. Bitcoin proved a public, tamper-proof ledger works at global scale. Nobody can edit it after the fact. Nobody can hide a transaction. Apply that same infrastructure to federal spending and waste doesn't survive long. Nobody overspends when the ledger has an audience. The question was never whether we could do it. It's whether the people spending the money want you to see it.

Charlie Kirk wanted blockchain technology applied to the federal government. Full transparency. Every dime of spending tracked in real time on a public ledger. His framing was simple: "It is not the government's money. We are the sovereign. We earn the money and the government extracts it from us with our consent." If that's the relationship, then taxpayers have a right to see where every dollar goes. Day by day. Department by department. The technology already exists. Bitcoin proved a public, tamper-proof ledger works at global scale. Nobody can edit it after the fact. Nobody can hide a transaction. Apply that same infrastructure to federal spending and waste doesn't survive long. Nobody overspends when the ledger has an audience. The question was never whether we could do it. It's whether the people spending the money want you to see it.

Teddy - PolyBackTest.com

168,462 views • 3 months ago

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

259,092 views • 11 months ago

$This is actually crazy Chad Bianco reveals how Democrats got voters to pass letting people steal up to $850 with no consequences Democrats knew voters would never vote for it, so instead they named it “The Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative” and voters were tricked into voting for it “Prop 47 made felonies, misdemeanors, misdemeanors, infractions, or not crimes anymore. It increased the, the level of theft to where it was a crime to that $950 threshold. And so that enabled just crime to just run rampant. It. It was profitable now to be a criminal, and there was no consequence” He says Gavin Newsom did this deception on purpose, “Never would the voters agree to that — The voters would never, ever, ever go for that -1 So what they did is they let you pass it and they gave you this sheet of paper and a ballot next to it with yes or no. And they said, ‘do you want safe schools and safe streets?’ And you said, yes, I do. And you said Yes. And that's what Prop 47 was. It was the Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative that our attorney General Kamala Harris at the time, our Secretary of State” “They lied to us and convinced us as voters to make that a law. And the thing that happens after that is that law can never be changed unless the voters change it. The lawmakers in Sacramento can't change a law that the voters put into place. So they lied to us. But why are they allowed to put deceiving descriptions on these laws? Because government made their own another law that said it was okay to lie to you.” Democrats are the party of criminals$

This is actually crazy Chad Bianco reveals how Democrats got voters to pass letting people steal up to $850 with no consequences Democrats knew voters would never vote for it, so instead they named it “The Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative” and voters were tricked into voting for it “Prop 47 made felonies, misdemeanors, misdemeanors, infractions, or not crimes anymore. It increased the, the level of theft to where it was a crime to that $950 threshold. And so that enabled just crime to just run rampant. It. It was profitable now to be a criminal, and there was no consequence” He says Gavin Newsom did this deception on purpose, “Never would the voters agree to that — The voters would never, ever, ever go for that -1 So what they did is they let you pass it and they gave you this sheet of paper and a ballot next to it with yes or no. And they said, ‘do you want safe schools and safe streets?’ And you said, yes, I do. And you said Yes. And that's what Prop 47 was. It was the Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative that our attorney General Kamala Harris at the time, our Secretary of State” “They lied to us and convinced us as voters to make that a law. And the thing that happens after that is that law can never be changed unless the voters change it. The lawmakers in Sacramento can't change a law that the voters put into place. So they lied to us. But why are they allowed to put deceiving descriptions on these laws? Because government made their own another law that said it was okay to lie to you.” Democrats are the party of criminals

Wall Street Apes

99,370 views • 3 months ago

Dave Ramsey explains why the government stopped making you pay your taxes by hand, and what would happen if it started again. RAMSEY: “If we brought this back, there would be a revolution. People would burn Washington, DC, down. “If the tax person from the IRS had to stand in the lobby of your company, and you got paid in cash, and you had to take your cash and hand it to the tax collector and count it out every time you got paid, people would realize how big a tick on your butt the government is, how big a parasite the government is. “And they would, I’m telling you, there’d be pitchforks and torches. “If you actually saw and physically had to take possession of the money and then give it back in cash to the government when you got paid, people’s faces would melt off.” KAMEL: “Just the amount of $100 bills you’re just giving to the IRS for doing nothing. That hurts. It would be a Tea Party round two.” RAMSEY: “So it was a really brilliant idea to do income tax withholding.” KAMEL: “Just make it all behind the scenes.” RAMSEY: “Brilliant psychological trick.”

Dave Ramsey explains why the government stopped making you pay your taxes by hand, and what would happen if it started again. RAMSEY: “If we brought this back, there would be a revolution. People would burn Washington, DC, down. “If the tax person from the IRS had to stand in the lobby of your company, and you got paid in cash, and you had to take your cash and hand it to the tax collector and count it out every time you got paid, people would realize how big a tick on your butt the government is, how big a parasite the government is. “And they would, I’m telling you, there’d be pitchforks and torches. “If you actually saw and physically had to take possession of the money and then give it back in cash to the government when you got paid, people’s faces would melt off.” KAMEL: “Just the amount of $100 bills you’re just giving to the IRS for doing nothing. That hurts. It would be a Tea Party round two.” RAMSEY: “So it was a really brilliant idea to do income tax withholding.” KAMEL: “Just make it all behind the scenes.” RAMSEY: “Brilliant psychological trick.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

734,481 views • 27 days ago