Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

They first kill children by using them as human shields, then they fabricate the victim narrative. Committing the crime, get away with it, and blaming someone else. Pro-Palestine activists are partners in Hamas crimes.

76,329 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Marlas Williams's profile picture
Marlas Williams2 years ago

Hamas understands psychological warfare. I also believe that part of their October 7 plan was to have people in the West, students and young professionals, etc. ready with a propaganda strategy in place that would distract and disrupt the public.

B.apologetics Paulin's profile picture
B.apologetics Paulin2 years ago

It's pally wood

Jannette Vega Æ🇺🇸🇬🇧🇮🇱...'s profile picture
Jannette Vega Æ🇺🇸🇬🇧🇮🇱...2 years ago

They're pure evilness, I hope they won't last in their wicked game of damaging lives of their own blood and of the nation of Israel. Hamas have been behaving since their foundation as stings of evil.

Eli 🎗️🇮🇱🇺🇸's profile picture
Eli 🎗️🇮🇱🇺🇸2 years ago

For so many reasons, UNRWA should be defunded/terminated. They are a very significant part of the problem.

leader 🎗️🚁's profile picture
leader 🎗️🚁2 years ago

Keep your enemies close but your human shields closer 💪

Carla Ribas 🧡's profile picture
Carla Ribas 🧡2 years ago

#Pallywood

Leslie Young ✡︎'s profile picture
Leslie Young ✡︎2 years ago

Shukran Mosab. 👏🏻 Thank you @RepBrianMast 👊🏼

Cora's profile picture
Cora2 years ago

Pro-Palestine activists who support Hamas have zero empathy for children. If they truly cared, they would have cried out in the streets when Israeli babies were murdered on October 7th. They never condemn Hamas for turning kids into suicide bombers. Where is the outrage for that?

LAVapes's profile picture
LAVapes2 years ago

I'd be willing to bet more than 90% of casualties are combatants, all ages included.

Mr.pager🎗️🇺🇸🇮🇱's profile picture
Mr.pager🎗️🇺🇸🇮🇱2 years ago

And then some people defend them

Related Videos

Sam Harris articulating why "using human shields" versus "being deterred by them" tells you "everything you need to know about the moral imbalance between Israel and her enemies." TRANSCRIPT: The truth is that everything you need to know about the moral imbalance between Israel and her enemies can be understood on the topic of human shields. Who uses human shields? Well, Hamas certainly does. They shoot their rockets from residential neighborhoods, from beside schools, and hospitals, and mosques. Muslims in other recent conflicts, in Iraq and elsewhere, have also used human shields. They have laid their rifles on the shoulders of their own children and shot from behind their bodies. Consider the moral difference between using human shields and being deterred by them. That is the difference we’re talking about. The Israelis and other Western powers are deterred, however imperfectly, by the Muslim use of human shields in these conflicts, as we should be. It is morally abhorrent to kill noncombatants if you can avoid it. It’s certainly abhorrent to shoot through the bodies of children to get at your adversary. But take a moment to reflect on how contemptible this behavior is. And understand how cynical it is. The Muslims are acting on the assumption—the knowledge, in fact—that the infidels with whom they fight, the very people whom their religion does nothing but vilify, will be deterred by their use of Muslim human shields. They consider the Jews the spawn of apes and pigs—and yet they rely on the fact that they don’t want to kill Muslim noncombatants. Now imagine reversing the roles here. Imagine how fatuous—indeed how comical it would be—for the Israelis to attempt to use human shields to deter the Palestinians. Of course, that would be ridiculous. The Palestinians are trying to kill everyone. Killing women and children is part of the plan. Reversing the roles here produces a grotesque Monty Python skit. If you’re going to talk about the conflict in the Middle East, you have to acknowledge this difference. I don’t think there’s any ethical disparity to be found anywhere that is more shocking or consequential than this.

Colin Wright

1,635,262 views • 2 years ago