They started debating the moon landing… then things got intense 😳 1969… real or staged? What do you believe?

NASA gets 70 million dollars a day to feed us bullshit.

If you really want to know the truth, watch this

Yes, we actually did go to the moon - several times. It's an incontovertable fact.

😂😂

@azaz_ovedya Multiple nations have craft orbiting it taking images, and you can see the landing sites. Getting to the moon is easy. Do you know ANYTHING about physics or astronomy?

@pamuszynski @TrumpGirlOnFire What treaty?

@pamuszynski @TrumpGirlOnFire What are we talking about here?

@hollywood2pt0 Fake for sure!!! Van Allen belt? Shadows? Tin can ship? No infrastructure to come back? Left the cameraman behind? ……. I can go on and on!

Pretty stupid considering we have photographic evidence of the lunar landing site sites from the LRO.

The single biggest clue that it was real is that the USSR never disputed it.

Nasa achieved the biggest accomplishment in history of mankind, then say they lost all original film and thousands of tapes of telemetry data. What a funking joke!

@Therealrobx

The bald fella’s brain is so tiny that he can’t comprehend what was achieved during the Apollo missions. What the idiots who don’t believe it happened realise is that there were two other programs called mercury and Gemini which tested out everything that was possible before hand

If you had a brain you wouldn’t ask if it was fake. It obviously was fake.

Why do they keep using the same tired talking points even after dozens of people have debunked it? The shadow nonsense in particular.. moon deniers are almost as dumb as flat earthers

Real. The lander base and rover is still there, as moon satellite pictures have shown.

If the US faked it why no fake Soviet landing, why no fake Chinese landing?

All that money and NASA can’t even sell us a good story

Watch the footage yourself. Why would they have to make it look like they were further away from Earth if they were going further away from the Earth ?? They never went that far out. The moon footage was a film set.

Is it questionable to believe that both occurred? A studio was arranged and filmed, in case footage wasn’t good enough to relay back. So they filmed in a studio to give the public something?

@ToscaAusten I think it was staged

Other countries have taken photographs of equipment left behind by the Apollo missions. The reflectors left behind are still used to this day.

Was not faked. Soviet Union and other independent trackers witnessed it. Clout chaser!

The entire year of 1969 was staged. They spent a year live-streaming that year to cover the year up because they didn’t want people making 69 jokes. Everything went back to normal in 1970, though.

@pplatesrgrate 💯% staged.

Nasa IS FAKE

We went. Apollo 16's buggy "grand prix" video proves we did. The only way the dust from those tires falls back to the ground like that is in a vacuum. There wasn't a vacuum chamber on earth big enough, then or now to film that in. Think gravel road dust.

@DKH013 Yeah, jowly Uncle Fester is a trusted source. Have you seen a SciFi movie from the 60’s? The actual landings were more easily done than faked with that era tech. Why is it so hard to believe? We’ve seen what SpaceX and Artemis can do, built on Mercury/Apollo. Conspiracy dolts.

Bullocks I was there first!

It’s a tax loop hole let’s get over it make a tin can cost 24 billion then you have a back up plan if people really no where there tax money is going

The replies will reveal the vaccinated

Psyop. NASA is more Section 31 than Starfleet. It's a low earth orbit intel agency, not what it purports to be.

If every single gram of weight is essential. How was there moon buggies on the moon just as an example. They couldn’t take a book up there to the moon as another example. The book that they did take was a 1,234 page version of the bible and that was on a slide. A microscopic version of it that weighed less than half a gram. Do I really need to continue.? It never happened. Now it’s 2026 better technology and I can safely assume it won’t happen again either.

Bart is a legend. He definitely knows what he’s talking about because he’s spent half his life hunting down the truth. Is he a bit abrasive? Yes. Perhaps even borderline maniacal. But what he isn’t is incorrect.

uncle fester?

The most compelling pieces of evidence that prove the landing was fake, has to be none other than the multiple interview clips throughout the years of the crew themselves. The standout is the press conference immediately after their return. Its weird, disjointed, awkward and off.

I have seen a full moon during the day. Shouldn't that be impossible