Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

They think William & Kate can remove Meghan’s title if she doesn’t bow. PSA: Meghan offered it back before she left. Your monarchy refused. & removing the Duchess title reverts Meghan to a Princess. Lastly, she did this before y’all. Your FQ Kate needs notes 2 read 2 sentences.🙃

Queens R. Made

11,753 subscribers

42,531 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🎧to Meghan she's more than a name/title!Yes, HRH Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex, knew who she was before any title; & that’s why she can’t be reduced to one. She's love, she's peace, she's joy, she's inspiration... #WithLoveMeghan #InspiredbyMeghan #MeghanSussex #PrincessMeghan

🎧to Meghan she's more than a name/title!Yes, HRH Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex, knew who she was before any title; & that’s why she can’t be reduced to one. She's love, she's peace, she's joy, she's inspiration... #WithLoveMeghan #InspiredbyMeghan #MeghanSussex #PrincessMeghan

Agatha Green

16,501 views • 3 months ago

As the monarchy crumbles and the realization that William and Kate can’t save it. They’re trying to entrap Prince Harry & his family. That family doesn’t care about the Sussexes, they never have. I know that Meghan’s back is firmly turned on her persecutors. May she remain firm.

As the monarchy crumbles and the realization that William and Kate can’t save it. They’re trying to entrap Prince Harry & his family. That family doesn’t care about the Sussexes, they never have. I know that Meghan’s back is firmly turned on her persecutors. May she remain firm.

Carmella

30,510 views • 6 months ago

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 views • 1 month ago

What was Meghan’s name before marriage? Cos we still call her Meghan, the argument of “you can’t call her Kate, she got married whatever years ago” doesn’t make sense to me, do their first names change when they get married in the royal family? If it was the Middleton name i would understand but her first name doesn’t change cos she’s married💁🏾‍♀️?? Did the press name her Kate?

What was Meghan’s name before marriage? Cos we still call her Meghan, the argument of “you can’t call her Kate, she got married whatever years ago” doesn’t make sense to me, do their first names change when they get married in the royal family? If it was the Middleton name i would understand but her first name doesn’t change cos she’s married💁🏾‍♀️?? Did the press name her Kate?

SK 💃🏾🕺

219,333 views • 8 months ago

The two arsonists, #PrinceWilliam and #KateMiddleton, are still playing the victim card. William and Kate were never mentioned in the unconfirmed (fabricated/I don't believe it) story that the BM (British Media) is spreading; this means they were never part of it. But, of course, they want to insert themselves into it, acting as if #PrinceHarry or #Meghan is interested in meeting them. Meghan and Harry moved on from Wales years ago, and Meghan firmly closed the door on Wales. Meghan wants nothing to do with those two. She didn't forget what Kate did to her, and that William sent Jason Knauf to help DailyMail in their case against her.. Funny how she is still a part of their world years after she left, while they aren't a part of hers. The last time she mentioned those two arsonists was in 2022.

The two arsonists, #PrinceWilliam and #KateMiddleton, are still playing the victim card. William and Kate were never mentioned in the unconfirmed (fabricated/I don't believe it) story that the BM (British Media) is spreading; this means they were never part of it. But, of course, they want to insert themselves into it, acting as if #PrinceHarry or #Meghan is interested in meeting them. Meghan and Harry moved on from Wales years ago, and Meghan firmly closed the door on Wales. Meghan wants nothing to do with those two. She didn't forget what Kate did to her, and that William sent Jason Knauf to help DailyMail in their case against her.. Funny how she is still a part of their world years after she left, while they aren't a part of hers. The last time she mentioned those two arsonists was in 2022.

THE SUSSEX SOLDIER 🪖

12,964 views • 24 days ago

Discussion with Catherine Mayer about Meghan The Duchess of Sussex being pitted against Kate Middleton Princess of Wales and that it’s unnecessary and damaging for the monarchy. Of course the right wing lady in the blue intentionally missing the point and derails it to inject that typical right wing whinge that Meghan chose to leave and is not royal or working as a royal, when the point is that when she was doing royal duties she was being demonised and that’s the reason she stepped back (silver lining 🥳🎉).

Discussion with Catherine Mayer about Meghan The Duchess of Sussex being pitted against Kate Middleton Princess of Wales and that it’s unnecessary and damaging for the monarchy. Of course the right wing lady in the blue intentionally missing the point and derails it to inject that typical right wing whinge that Meghan chose to leave and is not royal or working as a royal, when the point is that when she was doing royal duties she was being demonised and that’s the reason she stepped back (silver lining 🥳🎉).

Glow Lee

28,870 views • 26 days ago

Watch how Meghan Markle treats people in a wheelchair VS others She used this disabled person for a photo op & left as if she was going to catch cooties if she accidentally touched him. No interaction whatsoever Is this your “Humanitarian of the Year” Project Healthy Minds ?

Watch how Meghan Markle treats people in a wheelchair VS others She used this disabled person for a photo op & left as if she was going to catch cooties if she accidentally touched him. No interaction whatsoever Is this your “Humanitarian of the Year” Project Healthy Minds ?

MeghansMole©️

238,487 views • 9 months ago

I’ve got to give it up to Stephanie Sidley for calling this one before part 2 of the interview came out. She knew there was more to this than Harry & Meghan being “party crashers.” This was a masterclass in PR. Well played, Kris & Kim. 👏

I’ve got to give it up to Stephanie Sidley for calling this one before part 2 of the interview came out. She knew there was more to this than Harry & Meghan being “party crashers.” This was a masterclass in PR. Well played, Kris & Kim. 👏

Nancy Sidley

94,719 views • 5 months ago

When Meghan trolls try to tone down their trolling around women of colour. 🙄 Ha! Jeremy Vine and James Max who is also a big Meghan hater had to tone down their bitchiness on this Meghan piece because they had two women of colour defending her that would otherwise make them look like the couple of bitchy men they are. James even pretended he has only one issue with Meghan (which can now apply to William and Charles now they’re begging for reality streaming shows). Also Jeremy saying ‘You think she (Meghan) has been bullied?’, reminds me that he must know she has been, because how else can anyone think Meghan wasn’t bullied? Why else did she and Harry leave? The press and the family are still doing it. Chizzy’s show where Meghan got a name drop in the quoted tweet.

When Meghan trolls try to tone down their trolling around women of colour. 🙄 Ha! Jeremy Vine and James Max who is also a big Meghan hater had to tone down their bitchiness on this Meghan piece because they had two women of colour defending her that would otherwise make them look like the couple of bitchy men they are. James even pretended he has only one issue with Meghan (which can now apply to William and Charles now they’re begging for reality streaming shows). Also Jeremy saying ‘You think she (Meghan) has been bullied?’, reminds me that he must know she has been, because how else can anyone think Meghan wasn’t bullied? Why else did she and Harry leave? The press and the family are still doing it. Chizzy’s show where Meghan got a name drop in the quoted tweet.

Glow Lee

33,974 views • 7 months ago

This is nonsensical nonsense. She’s essentially telling them that in order to be a princess, she needed to become a princess, despite the fact that Princess Angela of Lichtenstein married her husband years before Meghan. This is terrible advice. Women can achieve anything they set their minds to. We don’t need to see Meghan Markle do it in order to achieve it. Her mindset is so 1950s for a supposed feminist. Never seen such antiquated thinking portrayed as something insightful. It isn’t.

This is nonsensical nonsense. She’s essentially telling them that in order to be a princess, she needed to become a princess, despite the fact that Princess Angela of Lichtenstein married her husband years before Meghan. This is terrible advice. Women can achieve anything they set their minds to. We don’t need to see Meghan Markle do it in order to achieve it. Her mindset is so 1950s for a supposed feminist. Never seen such antiquated thinking portrayed as something insightful. It isn’t.

Royal News Network

322,463 views • 2 years ago

Meghan is not new to this. Long before she met Harry, she was already doing advocacy work with the UN. The haters are furious because they tried to silence her and failed. It pains them to see her thriving and doing the global advocacy work she was passionate about long before she married into the viper’s nest. Imagine being expected to give up your voice to protect the egos of a lazy duo simply because of a random birth order. #MeghanInSwitzerland #WeLoveYouMeghan

Meghan is not new to this. Long before she met Harry, she was already doing advocacy work with the UN. The haters are furious because they tried to silence her and failed. It pains them to see her thriving and doing the global advocacy work she was passionate about long before she married into the viper’s nest. Imagine being expected to give up your voice to protect the egos of a lazy duo simply because of a random birth order. #MeghanInSwitzerland #WeLoveYouMeghan

Senior Lieutenant Zandi Sussex

11,195 views • 2 months ago

SHE HAD A WHOLE LIFE BEFORE HIM; she was never a lazy-waity woman. 📽️ GREAT INTERVIEW That #Meghan interview with the late Larry King—watch it; it's worthy of your time. It tells you a lot and also makes you realize how much she gave up to be with #PrinceHarry and to be part of the #ThatFamily. People always talk about the things Prince Harry left behind or gave up for Meghan; it’s always the man who gets credit, but never the woman. If you go back in time, you will realize how much Meghan has left behind and sacrificed for Prince Harry. She gave up her whole life, career, and everything to be part of #TheRoyalFamily. Yes, she gave up everything to be part of #ThatFamily, only to end up being mistreated and abused by his racist family, his jealous and abusive brother (#PrinceWilliam), his racist father (#KingCharles), his racist mother-in-law, and his racist, jealous, mumbling, and unaccomplished sister-in-law, #KateMiddleton. Kate used her white tears against the biracial Meghan. When PrinceHarry told Meghan to pack her things, saying, "We are leaving," he didn’t only save her; he did for her what she did for him—he returned the favor. He's a good man, great one. #GoodKingHarry. Fun fact: That interview took place in February 2016; months later, #PrinceHarry saw the dog filter, and the rest is history. (Btw Meghan first interview with #LarryKing was in 2013 (Suits).)

SHE HAD A WHOLE LIFE BEFORE HIM; she was never a lazy-waity woman. 📽️ GREAT INTERVIEW That #Meghan interview with the late Larry King—watch it; it's worthy of your time. It tells you a lot and also makes you realize how much she gave up to be with #PrinceHarry and to be part of the #ThatFamily. People always talk about the things Prince Harry left behind or gave up for Meghan; it’s always the man who gets credit, but never the woman. If you go back in time, you will realize how much Meghan has left behind and sacrificed for Prince Harry. She gave up her whole life, career, and everything to be part of #TheRoyalFamily. Yes, she gave up everything to be part of #ThatFamily, only to end up being mistreated and abused by his racist family, his jealous and abusive brother (#PrinceWilliam), his racist father (#KingCharles), his racist mother-in-law, and his racist, jealous, mumbling, and unaccomplished sister-in-law, #KateMiddleton. Kate used her white tears against the biracial Meghan. When PrinceHarry told Meghan to pack her things, saying, "We are leaving," he didn’t only save her; he did for her what she did for him—he returned the favor. He's a good man, great one. #GoodKingHarry. Fun fact: That interview took place in February 2016; months later, #PrinceHarry saw the dog filter, and the rest is history. (Btw Meghan first interview with #LarryKing was in 2013 (Suits).)

THE SUSSEX SOLDIER 🪖

20,598 views • 2 months ago

Princess Catherine is everything Meghan Markle wanted people to see when she married into the Royal Family: the admiration, the respect, the influence and that effortless global profile. The difference is that Catherine actually earned it. She didn’t spend years telling everyone how misunderstood she was or how important her voice should be. She quietly got on with the job, turning up, carrying out her duties, and letting her actions speak louder than any interview or statement. Over time, people came to respect her because they saw real consistency, dignity, and commitment. Meghan seemed to believe the title alone would deliver the same level of admiration. It doesn’t work like that. Respect isn’t something you can demand, buy, marry into, or claim just because you think you deserve it. People decide for themselves whether you’ve earned it. That’s why Princess Catherine is respected, and Meghan Markle is still chasing the kind of respect she thought would come automatically. Respect isn’t a wedding present. It’s built brick by brick, year after year. Something Meghan Markle will never understand.

Queen Esther

132,004 views • 1 month ago

On this week's Meghan Markle Flounder podcast, Meghan's guest, Hannah, stated she met Meghan at her house in person. 🚨Well here is the HUGE problem with that. 1. This was a time when COVID was at its height and California was in mandatory lockdown. Vaccines were not readily available yet to everyone. 2. Even if Meghan violated the Quarantine mandate, she put her moon bump in jeopardy because Omid Scobie was on record saying she did not have the Jab at the time of Prince Philips death in April 2021. 3. So if according to Meghan, she was VERY pregnant when she met Hannah, and Hannah couldn't really remember if she was pregnant or already had Lili, then someone is not telling the truth. Hannah claimed that she can remember meeting Meghan as if it were yesterday. If so be the case, how could she forget Meghan with a beach ball under her clothing? 4. No sane pregnant woman would put their unborn child at risk, knowing there was a deadly virus running around rampant, by inviting strangers into their home. -But then again, Meghan was ready to kill unborn Archie when she was 6 months Megnant, when she pretended to be suicidal. In addition, since this witch woman cried 5 different stories of miscarriage, one would think if her risks were high because she is a geriatric mother, susceptible to postpartum pre clampsia, she would not chance catching Covid at all costs, and instead do a ZOOM call like everyone else, to meet this stranger for the first time. MEGHAN MARKLE IS A DAMN LIAR. #sussexsquad #MeghanMarkleIsAConArtist #meghanmarkleisaliar #MeghanMarkleWasNeverPregnant #ConfessionsOfAFemaleFounder #KingCharlesTheCruel #meghanmarkleisanarcissist #MeghanMarkleAmericanPsycho #MeghanMarkleExposed

On this week's Meghan Markle Flounder podcast, Meghan's guest, Hannah, stated she met Meghan at her house in person. 🚨Well here is the HUGE problem with that. 1. This was a time when COVID was at its height and California was in mandatory lockdown. Vaccines were not readily available yet to everyone. 2. Even if Meghan violated the Quarantine mandate, she put her moon bump in jeopardy because Omid Scobie was on record saying she did not have the Jab at the time of Prince Philips death in April 2021. 3. So if according to Meghan, she was VERY pregnant when she met Hannah, and Hannah couldn't really remember if she was pregnant or already had Lili, then someone is not telling the truth. Hannah claimed that she can remember meeting Meghan as if it were yesterday. If so be the case, how could she forget Meghan with a beach ball under her clothing? 4. No sane pregnant woman would put their unborn child at risk, knowing there was a deadly virus running around rampant, by inviting strangers into their home. -But then again, Meghan was ready to kill unborn Archie when she was 6 months Megnant, when she pretended to be suicidal. In addition, since this witch woman cried 5 different stories of miscarriage, one would think if her risks were high because she is a geriatric mother, susceptible to postpartum pre clampsia, she would not chance catching Covid at all costs, and instead do a ZOOM call like everyone else, to meet this stranger for the first time. MEGHAN MARKLE IS A DAMN LIAR. #sussexsquad #MeghanMarkleIsAConArtist #meghanmarkleisaliar #MeghanMarkleWasNeverPregnant #ConfessionsOfAFemaleFounder #KingCharlesTheCruel #meghanmarkleisanarcissist #MeghanMarkleAmericanPsycho #MeghanMarkleExposed

TR G - The Royal Grift

78,932 views • 1 year ago

Dear royalist there is not danger of Kate posting a video like this because: 1. She lacks rhythm and by the looks of this video, fine motor skills. 2. She lacks a personality 3. After 20+ years in the spotlight, she still isn't comfortable in her own skin. While the pearl clutching by the those with Meghan Derangement Syndrome has been fun to watch. Some of you brits are really living up to your stuffy stick up the ass reputation. #MeghanSussex #HarryAndMeghan #LiliTurns4

Dear royalist there is not danger of Kate posting a video like this because: 1. She lacks rhythm and by the looks of this video, fine motor skills. 2. She lacks a personality 3. After 20+ years in the spotlight, she still isn't comfortable in her own skin. While the pearl clutching by the those with Meghan Derangement Syndrome has been fun to watch. Some of you brits are really living up to your stuffy stick up the ass reputation. #MeghanSussex #HarryAndMeghan #LiliTurns4

Benjamin Eley Cannell Parody (Fake/Parody)

647,916 views • 1 year ago

This woman was staying at a hotel when she accidentally left some money on the side of the bed before she left. She didn’t think anything of it. When she got back, the money was gone, there was a handwritten note thanking her for the tip. It’s known that if you leave money on the nightstand or the side of the bed, it’s usually a tip for the staff. Should she just let it go since this seems to be her mistake or should they give her her money back?

This woman was staying at a hotel when she accidentally left some money on the side of the bed before she left. She didn’t think anything of it. When she got back, the money was gone, there was a handwritten note thanking her for the tip. It’s known that if you leave money on the nightstand or the side of the bed, it’s usually a tip for the staff. Should she just let it go since this seems to be her mistake or should they give her her money back?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

399,523 views • 2 months ago