Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

They thought we wouldn't notice... they thought wrong. There's no such thing as a coincidence... Consider: 1. The Albanese Government requires us to put 12% of our pay into a superannuation fund... 2. Calls OUR Superannuation money a 'National Asset'... 3. Now he's using the ATO to stop people...

33,936 views • 20 days ago •via X (Twitter)

29 Comments

Vox populi's profile picture
Vox populi20 days ago

Look at the EU, Von Der Leyen now wants to take people's savings and place it in the control of the EU directly. This has been orchestrated across all leftist govts

Steve Terra Australis 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇮🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷's profile picture
Steve Terra Australis 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇮🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷19 days ago

Socialists gotta "National Asset" our money.

Defender's profile picture
Defender19 days ago

I setup my SMSF 9 years ago because I didn't trust the government. I bought non-digital assets that can't be easily seized because I didn't trust the government. They'll need their Gestapo jackboots to find it.

Mark Adam's profile picture
Mark Adam20 days ago

This must be a coincidence !

Michelle Sutton's profile picture
Michelle Sutton20 days ago

Told people this gov is coming for our super,gruberment is money hungry and corupt

Elg's profile picture
Elg20 days ago

It’s not 12% of your salary, your salary does not include that money it’s a contribution mandated of the employer by the government. If there was no superannuation then do you really think all employers would add it to your start? NO!

Stu's profile picture
Stu19 days ago

The government never did anything like this well. That money will be subject to extreme fees, corruption, over priced contracts, low returns and , extreme waste, inefficient spending. Let the superfunds manage the money themselves and determine if it is a good investment

Paul's profile picture
Paul20 days ago

Then you have that thing in the EU calling to use €10 trillion of citizens personal savings to fund economic growth.

Ellidaria's profile picture
Ellidaria20 days ago

They are theiving from us, there is no other explanation, our government is wanting to do what the EU has set out to do, steal from the poor to create a wealth for them, but use it against the poor, hideous

Ivan mcDonald's profile picture
Ivan mcDonald18 days ago

Money, any money and large amounts like Superannuation saving must be an absolutely irresistible goal of the kleptomaniacs in Canberra

Cruel Princess's profile picture
Cruel Princess18 days ago

Notice the wording around super being changed ??? Jim now refers to it as “UNIVERSAL SUPERANNUATION ” instead of the traditional term “Compulsory Superannuation” …. They changing the term to make it sound like it is a gift from governments like ‘universal income’ rather than a compulsory seized wage component

stuart ingram's profile picture
stuart ingram19 days ago

No, stop spreading misinformation! 1.APRA highlighted voluntary member-initiated contributions (alary sacrificing or personal after-tax top-ups) surged by 21% 2. Employers required by law to pay a minimum of 12% of employee's qualifying earnings into their nominated super fund.

TheJollyMule's profile picture
TheJollyMule19 days ago

“They” and “we” Extremely crude attempts to create division for consumption by simpletons You are not “we” old man

Very Important Poster's profile picture
Very Important Poster20 days ago

WEF Whistleblower claimed his job was to visit heads of countries and advise them it was in their best interests to undertake massive infrastructure projects, by borrowing from the World Bank. He stated that those that didn't, died mysterious deaths. This is the next trick.

Janet O'Brien's profile picture
Janet O'Brien19 days ago

Funny that, Ursula von der Leyen just said the same thing in Europe about savings. Coincidence, I think not. Straight from the globalist playbook.

reused content's profile picture
reused content19 days ago

both chalmers and albo will want to sleep with one eye open ..

Sarah Maloney's profile picture
Sarah Maloney20 days ago

OMG. Have you been listening to how much money people have mainly lost managing their own super? Of the instance of a “lead generator” destroying a super balance.

Okay's profile picture
Okay18 days ago

Super isn't your pay, it's separate. If it wasn't mandatory the business would keep that money, you wouldn't see a single cent. Fuck off.

te's profile picture
te18 days ago

Governments have never been profitable . Labor has lowered housing value inside of a Housing crisis . Increased interest rates , decreased Productivity , increased population , lowering per capita debt . Taking peoples super will only end in sorrow ! This must not Happen , it is not their money.

Zoppy McZop(Paul) ;🖤🤍🏆🇵🇸🍉's profile picture
Zoppy McZop(Paul) ;🖤🤍🏆🇵🇸🍉19 days ago

You are such a pin head.

James Carthew's profile picture
James Carthew19 days ago

Get SMSF, triple money on AI bubble, lose all money when bubble bursts. GG. Most people don't understand money and are easily suckered into scams and fraud. Made to manage their own money they will gamble it away while convincing themselves they are investment wizards.

Waltzing🦘Matilda's profile picture
Waltzing🦘Matilda19 days ago

This issue of Albo & Cohorts calling our superannuation money a "National Asset" has worried us for some time. We are now exploring alternatives. We don't want to lose what little we have left.

HARPERHP's profile picture
HARPERHP19 days ago

But for my very modest Superannuation account, I’d be on a full pension. Best initiative ever. BTW the Govt DOES NOT require you to put 12% of your pay into a super fund.

Xman8808's profile picture
Xman880820 days ago

They are going to use our super to pay off national debt arent they?

𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐒's profile picture
𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐒19 days ago

Who cares! Absolutely no one will do anything about it!!!

Aaron James Neal's profile picture
Aaron James Neal19 days ago

Boy, that took a while🤣 Only mucking about Topher.

A's profile picture
A18 days ago

A lot of fearmongering here to sell merch. Here are the actual facts: 1. The 12% rate wasn't Albanese: The legislated step-up to 12% was passed in 2014 under Tony Abbott's Coalition government. It's an employer-funded entitlement, not a pay cut.

Craig Stewart's profile picture
Craig Stewart19 days ago

Be more like me, poor. No savings,only debt. No one is lining up to take my debt away from me. 😭

Antony Crowe's profile picture
Antony Crowe18 days ago

Thanks heaps always informative

Related Videos

It’s time the people took back control of their money. Superannuation is centralised wealth controlled by a few boards who aren’t elected by the people. Nothing encapsulates just how dumb witted the neoliberals in the Liberal party are than superannuation. At the same time neoliberals like Howard and Hewson were sprucing free market ideology, the communists in the Labor party introduced Superannuation. A very clever way to get control of most Australians savings whilst enslaving them to even more debt. Rather than defend the right of people to control how they spend their money, when Howard and Costello took office in 1996 they actually increased the rate of superannuation rather than abolish it. By 2002 the rate of Superannuation had jumped to 9%. They did this because of pressure from the big banks who also saw the money that could be made by clipping the ticket on superannuation. CBA bought Colonial Mutual, NAB bought National Mutual, Westpac bought Bankers Trust and ANZ did a joint venture with ING. In short both parties sold out to the big end of town - big unions and big banks. Today 40% of people retire with a mortgage (up from 10% in 1992) yet the same percentage of retirees (50%) are still on a full pension. A trillion dollars of your superannuation is invested offshore. The only winners out of this are the paper shufflers in the big city ivory palaces who skim $30 billion a year out of superannuation in fees and use the $3 trillion of your capital to promote ideology not productivity. The losers are the people. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

66,879 views • 2 years ago

COMPULSORY SUPERANNUATION MUST END - WE MUST STOP WEAPONISING OUR ENEMIES AND START EMPOWERING WORKING AUSTRALIANS Yesterday Pauline Hanson quite rightly said that people should be able to access their superannuation only to then clarify her remarks by saying she still supports compulsory superannuation. You can’t support both positions. Either people can keep their wages to make ends meet, or they can’t. Anyone who has tried to access their superannuation early knows that there is a mountain of paperwork to manage and unintended fees and taxes. The idea people need permission to access their super early to make ends meet is just cruel and inhumane. For too long conservative parties have been too weak when it comes to standing up to compulsory superannuation. It’s not achieving its aim of significantly reducing the percentage of retirees on the pension but it is making it harder for people to make ends meet or buy a home. The Labor party love superannuation because it is a river of gold for the union movement that use it to milk fees and push their ideology. People First is not unequivocal about compulsory superannuation. We want to end it once and for all and let Australians save for their retirement in the best way possible by allowing them to own their own home as soon as possible. We will do that making superannuation voluntary, allow unlimited contributions and withdrawals and make the first $25,000 earned in superannuation tax free regardless of your age. To help us free you from government control sign up today at

Gerard Rennick

35,505 views • 1 month ago