Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

They told you gravity pulls everything down with magical force, yet this heavy anvil floats effortlessly on liquid mercury. Why? Because it’s all about relative density… not gravity. Things rise or fall based on their density compared to the medium they’re in. That’s observable, testable, repeatable. Gravity is the... show more

Flat Earth Zone

168,774 subscribers

311,362 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The earth is flat and under a dome how to destroy gravity in one minute!!! Things rise and fall due to their density relative to the density of their surroundings, not due to a magical force pulling them down. That's what I explained to you👌

The earth is flat and under a dome how to destroy gravity in one minute!!! Things rise and fall due to their density relative to the density of their surroundings, not due to a magical force pulling them down. That's what I explained to you👌

nikola 3

147,164 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Gravity is fake and gay. The natural physics of density and buoyancy determine that objects denser than the medium surrounding them sink, while objects less dense than the medium surrounding them rise. (The up/down direction is dictated by Earth's electromagnetic torus field) No other magical, unexplainable forces are required. The one and ONLY reason the freemasons created the "Gravity" story was to convince you that you are stuck to a giant spinning ball in space.

Gravity is fake and gay. The natural physics of density and buoyancy determine that objects denser than the medium surrounding them sink, while objects less dense than the medium surrounding them rise. (The up/down direction is dictated by Earth's electromagnetic torus field) No other magical, unexplainable forces are required. The one and ONLY reason the freemasons created the "Gravity" story was to convince you that you are stuck to a giant spinning ball in space.

₿en Wehrman

13,458 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"Gravity" is the most successful single-word brainwashing spell ever cast by the deceivers in control of our world. No "expert" can explain what gravity is or what causes it, and no matter how many dozens of miles up you go (clear videos exist of private rockets going up over 70 miles), the world never starts spinning away at 1,000 MPH. They always land right back in the same place they took off from. This is because the Earth is not spinning. It is a stationary, flat plane, just as we observe and feel with our own senses. There is no "gravity" holding the spinning ball atmosphere in place. The downward force pulling objects toward the Earth is based on density, buoyancy and electrostatics. That's it. [🎥: Cameron Thomason]

"Gravity" is the most successful single-word brainwashing spell ever cast by the deceivers in control of our world. No "expert" can explain what gravity is or what causes it, and no matter how many dozens of miles up you go (clear videos exist of private rockets going up over 70 miles), the world never starts spinning away at 1,000 MPH. They always land right back in the same place they took off from. This is because the Earth is not spinning. It is a stationary, flat plane, just as we observe and feel with our own senses. There is no "gravity" holding the spinning ball atmosphere in place. The downward force pulling objects toward the Earth is based on density, buoyancy and electrostatics. That's it. [🎥: Cameron Thomason]

₿en Wehrman

87,854 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Australia is not upside down. Once geocentrism clicks for you, you won't believe you actually used to buy this ridiculous nonsense. Density, buoyancy, and electrostatics. Those explain the entirety of why things move up and down in our environment. "Gravity" is made-up fakery.

Australia is not upside down. Once geocentrism clicks for you, you won't believe you actually used to buy this ridiculous nonsense. Density, buoyancy, and electrostatics. Those explain the entirety of why things move up and down in our environment. "Gravity" is made-up fakery.

Ben Wehrman

63,423 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

If gravity is powerful enough to keep billions of tons of ocean water stuck to a spinning ball Earth like glue... Why can a butterfly drift effortlessly through the air? 🦋 Why does smoke rise, soap bubbles float, and dandelion seeds glide upward? Under the very same force that's said to hold entire oceans in place? 🤨 If gravity explains why water stays down... Why does density suddenly explain why lighter objects move up? ⚖️ Shouldn't one force produce one consistent result...instead of different explanations for different situations? 🤔 [h/t conspiracy_peterx on IG]

If gravity is powerful enough to keep billions of tons of ocean water stuck to a spinning ball Earth like glue... Why can a butterfly drift effortlessly through the air? 🦋 Why does smoke rise, soap bubbles float, and dandelion seeds glide upward? Under the very same force that's said to hold entire oceans in place? 🤨 If gravity explains why water stays down... Why does density suddenly explain why lighter objects move up? ⚖️ Shouldn't one force produce one consistent result...instead of different explanations for different situations? 🤔 [h/t conspiracy_peterx on IG]

Ben Wehrman

15,785 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

"What is gravity?" It doesn't matter how many of the smartest scientists, physicists, whatever-ists you ask...NONE of them will ever be able to answer this question. This is because "gravity" is a completely made-up concept, invented purely to make NASA's spinning spaceball globe model possible. "Gravity" is not measurable. There is no way to test it. Nowhere in the real world will you ever see a small object sticking to a bigger object, let alone start orbiting around it. The entire idea is utterly silly when you actually stop and use your discerning brain. Bodies of mass DO NOT gain a magical suctioning ability as they increase in size. The ONLY REASON you think this happens when you move up to a giant scale is because NASA and fictional space movies have shown you the visual of actors sticking to a ball THOUSANDS OF TIMES over the course of your life. That is IT. You have NEVER seen this phenomenon occur outside of your television set or smartphone screen. Objects move up and down in our world due to DENSITY, BUOYANCY, and ELECTROSTATICS. That is IT. Gravity is not a factor. It does not exist, and never will.

"What is gravity?" It doesn't matter how many of the smartest scientists, physicists, whatever-ists you ask...NONE of them will ever be able to answer this question. This is because "gravity" is a completely made-up concept, invented purely to make NASA's spinning spaceball globe model possible. "Gravity" is not measurable. There is no way to test it. Nowhere in the real world will you ever see a small object sticking to a bigger object, let alone start orbiting around it. The entire idea is utterly silly when you actually stop and use your discerning brain. Bodies of mass DO NOT gain a magical suctioning ability as they increase in size. The ONLY REASON you think this happens when you move up to a giant scale is because NASA and fictional space movies have shown you the visual of actors sticking to a ball THOUSANDS OF TIMES over the course of your life. That is IT. You have NEVER seen this phenomenon occur outside of your television set or smartphone screen. Objects move up and down in our world due to DENSITY, BUOYANCY, and ELECTROSTATICS. That is IT. Gravity is not a factor. It does not exist, and never will.

Ben Wehrman

35,420 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

In the 1950s the United States Air Force launched a study in which cats were flown on parabolic flights to experience brief periods of weightlessness so researchers could see whether their gravity dependent righting reflex still worked. In microgravity the cats drifted and became disoriented because they had no sense of up or down, which showed that their ability to twist and orient themselves depends entirely on gravity.

In the 1950s the United States Air Force launched a study in which cats were flown on parabolic flights to experience brief periods of weightlessness so researchers could see whether their gravity dependent righting reflex still worked. In microgravity the cats drifted and became disoriented because they had no sense of up or down, which showed that their ability to twist and orient themselves depends entirely on gravity.

Brian Roemmele

224,984 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A common misconception in physics is that gravity must be negligible at the quantum scale because its measured strength appears weak compared to electromagnetism and the strong nuclear force. However, this perception arises from considering gravity only in its weak field limit. Obviously, it will appear weak under such conditions, but the situation changes when we consider regions of high mass-energy density. For example, when examining strong gravitational fields near black holes, the force becomes immensely powerful. With this in mind, lets re-examine unification and gravity at the quantum scale: Following our holographic mass solution, elementary particles like protons are found to be microscopic Schwarzschild black holes and their mass-energy density is sufficient to create a gravitational curvature equivalent to the strong nuclear force. The vacuum energy density of space provides enough energy to maintain these structures through Planck-scale dynamics, preventing their rapid evaporation via Hawking radiation, so they are ultra-stable. These discoveries, expounded in our studies like The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity, available to download for free on CERN's Zenodo preprint server-🔗 -demonstrate that what we observe as distinct fundamental forces are in fact manifestations of a unified force operating at different scales, where quantum vacuum fluctuations significantly curve spacetime (the curvature being gravity) with the resulting encapsulation generating screening effects that modulate the apparent strength of gravity from its fundamental high-energy state, which results in nuclear confinement forces, to its familiar weak-field behavior that appears as regular Newtonian gravity.

A common misconception in physics is that gravity must be negligible at the quantum scale because its measured strength appears weak compared to electromagnetism and the strong nuclear force. However, this perception arises from considering gravity only in its weak field limit. Obviously, it will appear weak under such conditions, but the situation changes when we consider regions of high mass-energy density. For example, when examining strong gravitational fields near black holes, the force becomes immensely powerful. With this in mind, lets re-examine unification and gravity at the quantum scale: Following our holographic mass solution, elementary particles like protons are found to be microscopic Schwarzschild black holes and their mass-energy density is sufficient to create a gravitational curvature equivalent to the strong nuclear force. The vacuum energy density of space provides enough energy to maintain these structures through Planck-scale dynamics, preventing their rapid evaporation via Hawking radiation, so they are ultra-stable. These discoveries, expounded in our studies like The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity, available to download for free on CERN's Zenodo preprint server-🔗 -demonstrate that what we observe as distinct fundamental forces are in fact manifestations of a unified force operating at different scales, where quantum vacuum fluctuations significantly curve spacetime (the curvature being gravity) with the resulting encapsulation generating screening effects that modulate the apparent strength of gravity from its fundamental high-energy state, which results in nuclear confinement forces, to its familiar weak-field behavior that appears as regular Newtonian gravity.

Nassim Haramein

19,882 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Russian scientist Viktor Grebennikov discovered the shocking secret behind real anti-gravity... and they buried it. While studying insects as an entomologist, he found a specific bug whose wings didn’t just fly, they levitated. When placed in a vial, the container started jumping violently off the table by itself, defying all known physics. He realized the microscopic structure on certain beetle wings creates a powerful anti-gravity effect under the right conditions. This wasn’t theory. He documented it. He even built devices based on the same principle. The elite and mainstream science immediately suppressed his work because free energy and anti-gravity technology would end their control over oil, aviation, and everything else. Ancient Egyptians carved this exact knowledge into stone with winged scarab beetles. They knew. Now the footage is resurfacing and it’s impossible to unsee. They told you anti-gravity was science fiction. Grebennikov proved it’s been hidden in nature all along. How much more have they kept from us? This is the forbidden discovery they never wanted you to see. 🤫

Russian scientist Viktor Grebennikov discovered the shocking secret behind real anti-gravity... and they buried it. While studying insects as an entomologist, he found a specific bug whose wings didn’t just fly, they levitated. When placed in a vial, the container started jumping violently off the table by itself, defying all known physics. He realized the microscopic structure on certain beetle wings creates a powerful anti-gravity effect under the right conditions. This wasn’t theory. He documented it. He even built devices based on the same principle. The elite and mainstream science immediately suppressed his work because free energy and anti-gravity technology would end their control over oil, aviation, and everything else. Ancient Egyptians carved this exact knowledge into stone with winged scarab beetles. They knew. Now the footage is resurfacing and it’s impossible to unsee. They told you anti-gravity was science fiction. Grebennikov proved it’s been hidden in nature all along. How much more have they kept from us? This is the forbidden discovery they never wanted you to see. 🤫

Forbidden Knowledge

725,386 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The crazy thing is once they don’t know what to say or are not educated on what they’re trying to talk about and defend they start with the insults. That’s their comeback almost all the time.

The crazy thing is once they don’t know what to say or are not educated on what they’re trying to talk about and defend they start with the insults. That’s their comeback almost all the time.

Ava

52,121 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 Bob Lazar breaks down alien craft tech: "There are three large cylindrical devices... these are the gravity amplifiers themselves." 👽🛸😱 He explains: "Looking down from the top you'd have the center so it's the reactor here powering the gravity amplifiers... gravity amplifiers output goes into the gravity emitters at the bottom." The wild part: "The resulting gravity beam or anti-gravity wave can be pretty much put anywhere you want to... they actually fly belly first... the craft flies along leaves the atmosphere of the planet it turns its belly to the destination... the three amplifiers focus in on the destination and that's how it perceived." Classic Lazar description—reactor, amplifiers, emitters, targeted gravity waves for insane maneuvers. Still one of the most detailed insider accounts. What do YOU think—does this gravity propulsion system sound like real reverse-engineered tech? Would focusing amplifiers explain UFOs' impossible turns and speed? Are you convinced by Lazar after all these years? Drop your theories or if this clip blows your mind below! 👽🛸🔧 #BobLazar #UFO

🚨 Bob Lazar breaks down alien craft tech: "There are three large cylindrical devices... these are the gravity amplifiers themselves." 👽🛸😱 He explains: "Looking down from the top you'd have the center so it's the reactor here powering the gravity amplifiers... gravity amplifiers output goes into the gravity emitters at the bottom." The wild part: "The resulting gravity beam or anti-gravity wave can be pretty much put anywhere you want to... they actually fly belly first... the craft flies along leaves the atmosphere of the planet it turns its belly to the destination... the three amplifiers focus in on the destination and that's how it perceived." Classic Lazar description—reactor, amplifiers, emitters, targeted gravity waves for insane maneuvers. Still one of the most detailed insider accounts. What do YOU think—does this gravity propulsion system sound like real reverse-engineered tech? Would focusing amplifiers explain UFOs' impossible turns and speed? Are you convinced by Lazar after all these years? Drop your theories or if this clip blows your mind below! 👽🛸🔧 #BobLazar #UFO

Interstellar

12,293 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Bob Lazar just dropped a bombshell. He revealed that he replicated the anomalous force which powered the UFO he worked on at Area 51 in his own experiments. “There’s another force—and it’s not gravity.” “There’s gigantic chunks that are missing from physics … ” Watch this incredible exchange he just had with Jesse Michels: Michels: “If you look at dark energy … it’s not one of the four fundamental forces, but it’s just the universe is inflating—” Lazar: “I’m not sure dark energy really exists.” Michels: “And dark matter.” Lazar: “I’m not really buying either one of them.” “It’s a placeholder.” Michels: “As early as the 50s, there’s all this crazy hardcore anti-gravity research.” “And then it kind of disappears.” “The two things that come up for gravity where there’s a lot of smoke, but no fire, is … extremely high electric field differentials creating thrust.” “The second thing is very fast rotating, spinning, superconductors.” Lazar: “But is that actually gravity?” Michels: “So there’s another force.” Lazar: “30 years has gone by, and I’ve been doing my own research.” “And I’m just more convinced that I am right … that there’s another force, and it’s not gravity.” Michels: “What does it look like?” Lazar: “It’s a repelling force.” “I think gravity is just an attractive force.” “I think this other force, you can, to simplify it, push or pull.” “And I think it also affects the flow of time, exactly like gravity does.” “I think it affects light.” Michels: “Have you ever measured this force?” Lazar: “Next question.” “Alright … yeah.” Michels: “You have?” Lazar: “Yeah.” Michels: “Is there anything high level that you can say as far as the goal of your research post-[Area 51]?” Lazar: “To duplicate anything.” Michels: “You think you can?” Lazar: “I’m 100% confident.” Michels: “Have you already gotten some interesting results?” Lazar: “Yeah, that’s why I’m 100% confident.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Bob Lazar just dropped a bombshell. He revealed that he replicated the anomalous force which powered the UFO he worked on at Area 51 in his own experiments. “There’s another force—and it’s not gravity.” “There’s gigantic chunks that are missing from physics … ” Watch this incredible exchange he just had with Jesse Michels: Michels: “If you look at dark energy … it’s not one of the four fundamental forces, but it’s just the universe is inflating—” Lazar: “I’m not sure dark energy really exists.” Michels: “And dark matter.” Lazar: “I’m not really buying either one of them.” “It’s a placeholder.” Michels: “As early as the 50s, there’s all this crazy hardcore anti-gravity research.” “And then it kind of disappears.” “The two things that come up for gravity where there’s a lot of smoke, but no fire, is … extremely high electric field differentials creating thrust.” “The second thing is very fast rotating, spinning, superconductors.” Lazar: “But is that actually gravity?” Michels: “So there’s another force.” Lazar: “30 years has gone by, and I’ve been doing my own research.” “And I’m just more convinced that I am right … that there’s another force, and it’s not gravity.” Michels: “What does it look like?” Lazar: “It’s a repelling force.” “I think gravity is just an attractive force.” “I think this other force, you can, to simplify it, push or pull.” “And I think it also affects the flow of time, exactly like gravity does.” “I think it affects light.” Michels: “Have you ever measured this force?” Lazar: “Next question.” “Alright … yeah.” Michels: “You have?” Lazar: “Yeah.” Michels: “Is there anything high level that you can say as far as the goal of your research post-[Area 51]?” Lazar: “To duplicate anything.” Michels: “You think you can?” Lazar: “I’m 100% confident.” Michels: “Have you already gotten some interesting results?” Lazar: “Yeah, that’s why I’m 100% confident.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

259,693 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ginestra Bianconi thinks gravity can be derived from entropy — and that gravity itself is fundamentally anti-reductionistic, since it's about geometry rather than isolated particle interactions. In this episode, the network-topologist-turned-gravity-theorist explains her "Gravity from Entropy" action, which treats matter and geometry symmetrically through a geometric quantum relative entropy (not the horizon entropy of Verlinde or Jacobson). She details why it reduces to Einstein's equations at low energy while predicting a dynamical, always-positive dark energy term (the "G field"), how it may avoid black hole singularities and reproduce the area law without invoking holography, and why she believes understanding the brain may be harder than understanding quantum gravity. We close with her advice for young researchers. I hope you enjoy.

Ginestra Bianconi thinks gravity can be derived from entropy — and that gravity itself is fundamentally anti-reductionistic, since it's about geometry rather than isolated particle interactions. In this episode, the network-topologist-turned-gravity-theorist explains her "Gravity from Entropy" action, which treats matter and geometry symmetrically through a geometric quantum relative entropy (not the horizon entropy of Verlinde or Jacobson). She details why it reduces to Einstein's equations at low energy while predicting a dynamical, always-positive dark energy term (the "G field"), how it may avoid black hole singularities and reproduce the area law without invoking holography, and why she believes understanding the brain may be harder than understanding quantum gravity. We close with her advice for young researchers. I hope you enjoy.

Curt Jaimungal

22,981 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

If smoke comes out of a train moving 20 MPH, it creates a clear trail behind its movement. If smoke comes out of a volcano on a spinning Earth ball rotating at 1,000 MPH equatorial surface speed (plus 2M+ additional MPH in 5 different directions as we corkscrew through the solar system + galaxy + infinitely-expanding universe...) the smoke goes straight up, because "gravity" (a concept invented by freemasons) turns on, and makes all of the air everywhere stick to the Earth ball like cosmic superglue. BUT...this ultra-powerful gravity force magically disappears when you let go of a balloon 🎈🪄 What do you think...are you "trusting the science" on this one? Or is something fishy going on here? 🤔

If smoke comes out of a train moving 20 MPH, it creates a clear trail behind its movement. If smoke comes out of a volcano on a spinning Earth ball rotating at 1,000 MPH equatorial surface speed (plus 2M+ additional MPH in 5 different directions as we corkscrew through the solar system + galaxy + infinitely-expanding universe...) the smoke goes straight up, because "gravity" (a concept invented by freemasons) turns on, and makes all of the air everywhere stick to the Earth ball like cosmic superglue. BUT...this ultra-powerful gravity force magically disappears when you let go of a balloon 🎈🪄 What do you think...are you "trusting the science" on this one? Or is something fishy going on here? 🤔

Ben Wehrman

18,439 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat