Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

They’re not hiding it anymore. Unelected EU power, selective censorship, zero accountability. Europe shows what happens when citizens stay passive. America isn’t there yet. But we’re close. It’s time for is builders organize before it’s too late. Join 6000+ others👉 📅 December 26, 2025 #TakeAmericaBack #FreeSpeech #EUHypocrisy #CitizenLeadership #Builders...

36,249 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔥 THE EU HAS FAILED — AND THEY’RE STILL LYING ABOUT WHO’S TO BLAME This clip is a nuclear truth bomb — and Brussels won’t want you to hear it. Iosfina Pascal lays it out with brutal clarity: Europe’s crisis isn’t “Russia, Russia, Russia.” It isn’t “disinformation.” It isn’t “external threats.” The real threat is the European Union’s own catastrophic leadership. She exposes the truth: • The EU failed during COVID • The EU failed on Ukraine • The EU failed on energy, industry, and stability • The EU is hiding behind Russia to avoid accountability • The EU is collapsing under green fanaticism, censorship, and cultural extremism Instead of protecting Europe… They bankrupt their own citizens. They destroy their own industries. They silence dissent. They push gender ideology on children while the continent burns. And then they point to Moscow and shout: “It’s Russia!” No. The blame sits in Brussels. As Iosfina says: “We’re not going to defeat Russia or anyone else by destroying ourselves.” Europe is losing on every front — economically, culturally, strategically. And yet the super-state in Brussels insists it can “win” a war it has no plan, no capacity, and no unity to fight. This is the slow death of a continent led by unelected bureaucrats who answer to no one. The era of blaming Russia for every failure is over. Europe’s leaders did this. And Europe’s people will pay — unless they finally stand up and say: Enough. Iosefina Pascal

Jim Ferguson

63,183 views • 9 months ago

🚨 WHEN THE TRUTH IS TOO DANGEROUS FOR THE POWERFUL—THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS Ex-CIA contractor Patrick Byrne has just made extraordinary allegations—claims so explosive that most media outlets will never touch them. In a discussion with Alex Jones, Byrne stated that senior intelligence channels are warning that Candace Owens is being targeted for retaliation after exposing powerful networks operating behind the political façade of Europe. Byrne insists that there is more beneath the surface—global agendas, elite protection systems, and institutional panic when scrutiny comes too close. Whether every detail proves true or not, one point from Byrne stands unchallenged: When someone questions narratives that protect power structures, they are instantly attacked—not on facts, but with intimidation, legal warfare, and coordinated smear campaigns. And why is this happening now? Because Owens openly challenged elite behaviour, political manipulation, and manufactured narratives—exactly where the establishment refuses any accountability. Byrne’s deeper warning was not about personalities but about patterns: – Elections being manipulated across nations – Intelligence agencies operating above public consent – Censorship weaponised against inconvenient voices – Truth-tellers punished rather than disproven He stated the obvious: When questioning power becomes dangerous—that is when society must pay attention. Whatever one thinks of Candace Owens, this principle holds: You only try to silence people when you fear what they are uncovering. Byrne’s message is ultimately not about scandal—it’s about systems. And the question now is not whether elite networks will strike back… But whether the public finally recognises that sunlight is the threat these institutions fear most. Truth has enemies. And that alone tells you everything. Alex Jones Patrick Byrne

Jim Ferguson

92,244 views • 8 months ago

“The No. 1 Thing I’ve Learned During the Right-Wing Civil War” The loudest voices on the Right —Tucker Carlson most prominently—wouldn’t last one day as openly Jewish Americans. When Tucker gets criticized for terrible takes, he doesn’t defend them; he cries censorship. But Tucker, no one’s silencing you! You’re being criticized because your takes are garbage: anti-American, anti-capitalist, and embarrassingly weak-minded. You hide behind a fake shield of “free speech” while trying to silence others. That’s not censorship. That’s cowardice. And it’s not your skin color or religion we reject; it’s your words and actions. The things YOU control. There’s this myth that Jews are weak, especially in America. But you? You’re weaker than our weakest. Because strength isn’t about avoiding criticism; it’s about facing it head-on. You want to play victim? Try being a Jew on camera in this country for a week. Look at Dave Portnoy (Dave Portnoy). Not exactly a Chabad Jew, but when some clown shouted “F*** the Jews” during a Pizza Review, Portnoy didn’t fold. He stood there, let the camera roll, and is about to make that bigot famous. That’s strength. That’s what the ADL doesn’t understand with their “Stop the Hate” campaigns. You don’t stop hate by banning it; you stop it by confronting it and destroying it. That’s what America did in 1945, and during the Cold War. (A reminder, Tucker: Russia were the baddies.) That’s what we’re doing now with you! Confronting weakness disguised as patriotism. When Ben Shapiro plays your own clips back to you, that’s not censorship; it’s accountability. We’re holding you to your own words, and you hate that. Because the truth is, you sound like a weaker version of Jonathan Greenblatt; whining about criticism while trying to muzzle it. So here’s my advice: grow a pair, and grow a perspective. Or go elsewhere. Because you’re going to lose this war. America is still the greatest country on earth, and we’re not letting frauds like you ruin it with your excuses and sympathy for tyrants. You’re being criticized not because of who you are, but because of what you’ve become: a liar for hostile regimes, a mouthpiece for moral rot, a man allergic to criticism. You talk about strength, but every time someone calls you out, you crumble. You project, you deflect, you play the victim. Doing anything to hide that you’ve betrayed the very values you claim to defend. You think Jews are the problem? No, Tucker. The problem is men who pretend to love America while trying to silence the people who actually do.

Jake Donnelly

42,298 views • 9 months ago

🚨 Donald Trump says, “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition… We’re there now, and we’re going to stay.” This is not ambiguity. This is not bluster. This is a public declaration of occupation. A US president announcing in plain English that America will govern another sovereign country by force until it decides otherwise. He boasts about equipment. He boasts about killing boats. He boasts about strikes. And then he says the quiet part out loud: ➡️ The US will decide who runs Venezuela. ➡️ The US will stay as long as it wants. ➡️ The US will not “take a chance” on Venezuelans choosing wrongly. This is not democracy. This is imperial rule. And it mirrors, word for word, the logic used by Vladimir Putin: • We know best • They can’t be trusted • We’ll stay until it’s “safe” • Law is secondary to power Now look at Britain. Keir Starmer has said nothing. No criticism. No warning. No defence of international law. That silence now sits next to Trump’s own words. Brexit Britain was sold sovereignty. What it delivered was dependency. Outside the EU, the UK no longer anchors itself in collective law or restraint, it orbits US power instead. And when the US openly abandons the rules, Britain looks away. You cannot defend Ukraine and excuse this. You cannot condemn Putin and stay silent on Trump. You cannot claim to stand for law while backing occupation “until we decide”. Trump isn’t hiding what he’s doing. He’s boasting. The real question is why so many leaders in the UK especially are pretending not to hear him. Because once a powerful state can openly say “we will run another country”, the rules-based order is already gone. And silence doesn’t preserve it. Silence finishes it.

Liz Webster

15,455 views • 7 months ago

Democrats, in a stunning display of irony, are building an impenetrable wall around their convention in Chicago and demanding ID from everyone entering the venue. This comes from the same party that decries walls as racist and insists that requiring ID is discriminatory. Meanwhile, all the appointments for free vasectomies for Democrat men at the convention have already filled up. _________________________ In a move that would be laughable if it weren’t so hypocritical, the Democratic Party is set to erect an impenetrable wall around their convention venue in Chicago and require photo ID from everyone who wants to attend. Yes, you read that correctly. The very party that has spent years branding walls as racist and denouncing voter ID laws as discriminatory is now embracing both when it serves their interests. For years, Democrats have vilified anyone who dares suggest that America needs secure borders. They’ve gone so far as to label the construction of a border wall as an act of racism. Yet, when it comes to protecting their own, suddenly walls are a necessity. The message is clear: walls for us, but not for thee. And let’s talk about the ID requirement. We’ve heard it all before from the left—demanding ID is discriminatory, it disenfranchises voters, it’s racist. Yet, when it comes to their convention, ID suddenly becomes essential. If Democrats truly believe that requiring ID is oppressive, why are they so quick to enforce it when their own security is on the line? The irony is staggering. But the absurdity doesn’t stop there. Appointments for free vasectomies for Democrat men at the convention have already filled up. It’s almost as if they’re taking their dedication to population control to a whole new level. The left has long championed the idea of controlling the population through abortion and now, it seems, they’re encouraging sterilization as well. This whole situation reeks of hypocrisy. It’s a classic case of “rules for thee, but not for me.” When it comes to protecting their own interests, Democrats are more than willing to throw their so-called principles out the window. Whether it’s building walls, demanding ID, or promoting population control, they’ll do whatever it takes to maintain their power. The double standards on display here are just too glaring to ignore. The Democratic Party has revealed, yet again, that their true agenda is not about fairness or equality, but about control. Control of the borders when it suits them, control of the voting process when it benefits them, and control of the population through whatever means necessary. As we watch the events unfold at the Democratic convention, we’re reminded once more that the left’s hypocrisy knows no bounds. They’ll preach one thing and practice another, all in the name of power. And the American people are expected to sit back and accept it. But we won’t. It’s time to call out this hypocrisy for what it is. The Democrats can’t have it both ways. If they’re going to build walls and demand ID at their convention, they should be held accountable for the same actions they’ve demonized in others. The American people deserve leaders who stand by their principles, not ones who twist them to suit their convenience. So, as the Democrats gather behind their walls and check IDs at the door, let’s remember what this says about their true values. It’s not about fairness or justice—it’s about control. And that’s something every American should be concerned about.

@amuse

27,730,497 views • 2 years ago

Good afternoon, everyone. It was an honor to meet everyone and talk with you at MSTR True North World — among friends, pioneers, skeptics, and the quietly curious. Since January of 2021, I’ve been studying Bitcoin. And over the last 6 months, I’ve spent more than 121 hours interviewing executives, analysts, allocators, CFOs, board members, and everyday Bitcoiners across New York, Miami, Boston, Paris and beyond. I’ve sat in boardrooms and basements, on stages and at poolside bars. I’ve heard ideas sharpened by experience — and caution shaped by capital risk. And what I’ve come away with is simple: Bitcoin treasuries are no longer theory. They are becoming practice. Quietly, strategically, and at the edges of the legacy system. I've come away with three lessons. Lesson 1: No one’s asking “why” anymore—they’re asking “how.” The shift is subtle, but it’s everywhere. In 2021, the question was: Why would we hold Bitcoin on a corporate balance sheet? In 2023, it became: What are the risks? How do we explain this to auditors and boards? Now in 2025, it’s: What’s our timing strategy? What percentage makes sense? Which vendors do we engage with for custody and beyond? Lesson 2: The conversation isn’t just financial—it’s philosophical. This isn’t just about a hedge—it’s about preparing for a world that feels less anchored. Bitcoin represents something beyond volatility charts. It’s about opt-out optionality. It’s about control. That’s why it’s attractive to sovereigns, startups, and mid-market CEOs alike. Lesson 3: Geography matters—but mindset matters more. In El Salvador, Bitcoin is infrastructure. In Paris, it’s a hedge against monetary orthodoxy. In New York, it’s a bet on innovation. But everywhere I go, the common thread isn’t politics or price—it’s resilience. The smartest people in capital markets today are quietly exploring how Bitcoin can help them withstand turbulence — not chase returns. The world is shifting beneath our feet. Inflation targets are guesses. Debt ceilings are flexible. Global trust in fiat systems is fraying. And in that context, Bitcoin isn’t just a tech play — it’s a strategic reserve choice. The positioning has shifted. We’re no longer betting on Bitcoin. We’re acknowledging it. That’s the future we’re walking into — not maximalist or minimalist, but realist. Realists are saying: “Let’s not put 100% of our reserves into this—but let’s not ignore it either.” They’re adding 1%, 2%, 3%—quietly. And what that means is: the next chapter of adoption won’t necessarily be loud. It’ll be layered into spreadsheets, policies, and quarterly risk disclosures. But none of this happens in a vacuum. Bitcoin isn’t just about bytes and blocks — it’s about people. The community I’ve met through these 121 hours—analysts, entrepreneurs, regulators, CFOs—they all have something in common: They’ve had the conversation. They’ve questioned the system. They’ve reached for something sturdier, even when it felt risky. In that way, Bitcoin treasuries aren’t just about capital reserves. They’re about emotional reserves. About saying: “We want to build something we believe in—even if it’s hard to explain on CNBC.” So what’s next? We’re entering a phase where Bitcoin will coexist with the legacy system—not replace it overnight. Treasuries won’t go all in. But they’ll lean in. They’ll study, they’ll test, and eventually, they’ll move. And as that happens, it won’t be a parade. It’ll be a process. So my invitation to you—whether you’re a Bitcoiner, a builder, a skeptic, or a steward of capital — is this: Keep having the conversation. Keep asking “how.” And most importantly—stay connected to the people who are asking questions of you. Because at the intersection of code and community, we’re building the next generation of financial truth. Thank you. Let’s keep going.

Tim Kotzman

30,231 views • 1 year ago