正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

"They've built something I call technocratic feudalism, and inside it, they run a program called manufactured friction." "It's the reason why... there's always a crisis, a feud, or a fight... But chaos alone isn't enough." "They've turned your life into compliance capitalism, where you don't just pay for access,...

56,915 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Ray Lewis shares what tearing his triceps taught him about pain and why most people quit too soon. "There's 2 sides of pain that I don't think a lot of people really understand." "There's one side of pain that's the suffering and the discomfort side of pain. That's why everybody raised their hands when I asked if they've ever been through pain. Because that hurts." That's the pain we all know. The pain we run from. "But then there's another side of pain. That's called effort. It's called glory. It's called - if you can find a way to push through pain, there's something greater on the other side of it." Most people never get there. It's resilience and pushing past adversity. "If you never tap into it, it's because the first time you felt that, you backed off...And we rationalize with ourselves to where we automatically stop." "That's why a bunch of us give up so much in life so quickly." To overcome adversity, you have to be willing to face it. It takes courage. "That's why kids have a problem finishing things in today's time. Because as soon as they feel a small bit of discomfort - of things ain't right - they're gone. 'I can't do it no more.'" Then he said something everyone needs to hear: "But suppose I told you - the greatest pain of my life is the reason I'm standing here today." Resilience is a muscle you build. It isn't something you have, but something you develop. It's built when you show up even when it's hard. You build it by overcoming adversity and challenges. (🎥 TedX Talks)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

39,426 次观看 • 5 个月前

Marc Andreessen just said what no politician will ever admit. The ideology that claims to protect the working class is what ensures they never leave it. Rogan: “We just assume that everybody who makes an incredible amount of money stole it.” That assumption isn’t accidental. It’s load-bearing. Remove it and the entire redistribution framework collapses. Because if wealth is created and not taken, the builder isn’t your enemy. And if the builder isn’t your enemy, you don’t need the politician who promised to fight them on your behalf. Andreessen: “Jeff Bezos is the obvious counterexample. Every time you do the one-click and the thing gets delivered to you two hours later at the cheapest possible price, saving you and your family a lot of time and money.” Bezos didn’t take from the economy. He expanded it. Every transaction voluntary. Every customer better off. Every dollar of his net worth is proof someone chose his service because it made their life easier. The economy isn’t a vault with a fixed amount inside. It’s a system that grows every time someone builds something people want. The fixed pie is a lie. And it has to be. Because the moment you accept the pie grows, you have to ask why you aren’t growing it yourself. That’s the question the ideology exists to prevent. Andreessen: “You can compare and contrast to other countries that have more draconian policies. And the result is they’re much poorer.” Every country that punished creation got less of it. No exceptions. Rogan: “That’s the weird thing about the whole socialism thing, is that it’s never worked ever, and they just go, ‘Well, it hasn’t been done right.’” A century of data across dozens of countries. Same experiment. Same collapse. The ideology doesn’t update because updating would end it. The people pushing redistribution aren’t solving poverty. They’re managing it. Solved poverty doesn’t need a program. Doesn’t need a department. Doesn’t need a politician who campaigns on it every cycle. Poverty is the product that funds the bureaucracy built to eliminate it. When a founder reinvests instead of extracting, that’s not avoidance. That’s deployment. Every dollar reinvested becomes a job. A contract. A supplier. A chain of downstream opportunity that vanishes the moment someone confiscates it at the source to fund a program that will never solve what it was designed to manage. The freest economies produce the most prosperity. The most regulated produce the most dependency. That’s not a coincidence. Dependency is the business model. Free people who build don’t need the system. The system needs people who don’t build. The greatest theft in the history of economics was never committed by a billionaire. It was committed by every ideology that looked a capable person in the eye and convinced them they were helpless. The most dangerous thing you can do inside a redistribution framework isn’t to resist it. It’s to succeed without it. Because one person who builds their way out of nothing, without permission, without a program, without the system, is living proof that everything the ideology told you was a lie. And that proof is the one thing the framework cannot survive.

Dustin

24,499 次观看 • 19 天前

"I can tell the women [who took a COVID injection] they have spike protein in their pituitary, in their ovaries, in their uterus, in the umbilicus going to the child in utero, the placenta, and the fetus embryo. It goes all over that system." This clip of Dr. Robert Chandler, a contributing author to The Pfizer Papers and an esteemed (retired) orthopedic surgeon who has significantly advanced orthopedic surgery through clinical trials and medical management, is taken from a discussion with Liz Gunn (Liz Gunn) and VAERSAware creator Albert Benavides (WelcomeTheEagle) posted to Rumble on May 30, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "I gave a talk with the National Citizens Inquiry Group in Canada about, the effect on women. And it's every organ, just about, but specifically, the reproductive system. With Dr. Burkhardt's library here, I can tell the women they have spike protein in their pituitary, in their ovaries, in their uterus, in the umbilicus, going to the child in utero child, the placenta, and the fetus embryo. It goes all over that system. "And one thing I point out that I led. And you can look that up on the NCI. It's on the Rumble app. NCI has a whole series of very good presentations. They've been doing this for a couple years. And I start off by saying, why would women and men be the same? Because women have so much more machinery. "When you look at. And I call it, I was a lab assistant of biorhythms lab when I was an undergraduate. And we studied circannual rhythms. And there's daily rhythms, circadia, or daily rhythms. You sleep at night, you eat, you have this pattern. Reproduction is a circannual rhythm. People conceive in the fall, winter, and they deliver in the spring, summer, circumensis is something men just don't have. It's this monthly process where two hormones get issued out of the pituitary that go to the ovary and produce this vascular change. "Okay, we've talked about vascularity, right? That vascularity is a target. And I floated this idea that the reason why men get the myocarditis is because they don't have a uterus to tap off that bunch of spike protein in the nanoparticles. It's a safety valve. But they have to live with the disability. Well, which do you want? You want to fall over dead or live with a disability? A lot of the disability has to do with that menstrual cycle, because every component of that system and men don't have it, is impacted by the nanoparticle MRNA spike system. "And so you think, why wouldn't they have more problems? Why wouldn't they have, more disability? Why wouldn't they have more impact on their reproduction? And now we're seeing populations around the world implode, particularly in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. The Communist party is not going to have to do anything. They're going to have a deserted island pretty soon because they're way below replacement, population. And that was a natural, process that accelerated. It's called the second derivative effect. "And, yes, this thing about women, and, I'm a big advocate for. And that's. If I could talk to Kennedy, I would say you've got to split into men and women. And when you're going to do a drug test, you have to test them separately. Because that's what the COVID vaccines have taught me anyway, is you can't assume the boys and the girls are going to have the same reaction. Why would you? They've got different machinery."

Sense Receptor

49,638 次观看 • 1 年前