Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Thick daddy explodes raw, convulsing release & heavy afterglow… 🥵 💦 Full video live on desiPalette #OliveSardar #DesiBear #DesiPalette #daddy #AiGen

12,009 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨PREVIEW: PART IV of Tai's WeAreNotGoingToMars Just DROPPED And It's AN Absolute NUCLEAR BOMB On The Charlie Kirk ASSASSINATION A 3.5-hour forensic masterpiece just went live and it proves: Charlie wasn’t killed by a .30-06 from Tyler Robinson He was taken out by TWO separate weapons: 🔘Infrared-guided sniper round from the BA building (neck hit) 🔘 Close-range palm pistol from the front-left (shirt puffs out like a damn cartoon) The sky is crawling with MILITARY DRONES in the raw footage – six of them doing impossible zig-zags and streaks. Not birds. Not lens flares. Israeli Elbit “Birds of Prey” swarm tech already used in Gaza. The entire UVU courtyard was a pre-designed KILLBOX with deliberate camera dead zones so the real shooters would never be seen. Motive? Charlie broke the ultimate elite oath: he went public against the Epstein-Israel blackmail machine and was about to expose Trump’s real role in it. They ritualistically executed him in broad daylight as a message (just like Caesar on the Ides of March). Elbit Systems (Israel’s drone giant) has non-competitive contracts all over Utah and Delaware, building helmets and AI targeting systems 99% in Israel while we pay for it. The same tech that “malfunctions” in Gaza” just got its first confirmed kill on American soil. This isn’t a conspiracy video. This is frame-by-frame, slow-motion, enhanced, sourced evidence that will make your stomach drop. Tai ends it with: “UVU has the full security footage. Release it or admit you’re part of the cover-up.” FOLLOW WeAreNotGoingToMars And Go Watch before they memory-hole it. I'll leave the link to his FULL VIDEO in the comments below. Tag everyone. Repost everywhere. Charlie deserves the truth.

Project Constitution

44,643 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨Warning🚨 - Some parts of this conversation are difficult to hear. I wasn’t originally going to release this interview in full. This was filmed as part of my upcoming documentary on digital ID. That was the brief. That was the intention. But once I sat down with Andrew Bridgen, it became clear very quickly that this conversation went far beyond what either of us expected. What came out was raw, unfiltered, and explosive. Covid. Vaccine harms. Excess deaths. Political pressure. Public inquiries. Big Pharma. Digital ID. Agenda 2030. Freedom of speech. Media control. Child trafficking. Power structures. Corruption. And the personal cost of speaking out. Because this was filmed for a documentary, not a standard sit-down interview, I want to be upfront. It’s a single camera angle throughout. I wasn’t mic’d up, so my audio is a little lower than Andrew’s in places. Nothing is polished. Nothing is sanitised. Nothing is cut to make it comfortable. But that’s also why it matters. Due to the sheer volume of messages asking for the full conversation, I’m releasing it in its entirety. Exactly as it happened. No edits to soften it. No clips taken out of context. Whether you agree with everything said or not, this is a conversation that should not be buried. Too much of what Andrew talks about is never allowed to be discussed openly, and that alone should concern people. If this interview resonates with you, don’t just watch it. Share it. Get it out there. Let others hear it and make up their own minds. Let’s get millions of eyes on this. Because conversations like this don’t surface by accident, and they don’t stay available unless people actively keep them alive. Full interview now live. This video is also available on Youtube at the link in the comments. This has not be uploaded to the usual Anomalous Media Youtube page as quite frankly it will probably get banned. If you appreciate this work please consider donating to the production cost of my up coming documentary "This Is Digital ID" GoFundMe link in comments.

Digby Furneaux

322,122 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

What has become clear with the Sol and Fable releases: Anthropic, has pulled into the lead by at least 1 full cycle — and this is bad. Mythos is already several months old, and while Sol is good I would still pick Fable for ~50-55% of tasks. Meanwhile, Anthropic, has not been resting, they'll have another model here soon enough (and once again tell everyone why its so scary - please, flog me daddy). Anthropic being in the lead is dangerous. It gives them the very power we shouldn’t trust them with. Dario himself said: “Now that we are in a leading position, I, and Daniella, are trying to move the dial even further towards being careful. Thats what the Mythos release was about. It’s very hard to do something like that if you’re not the leading player” He's not wrong. Being the leading player has given Anthropic the ability to push this agenda hard. He is a true believer in the dangers of AI, but frighteningly believes that the only mitigation full control by a small number of people, him being one of them - if not the chief. He really believes that. If you think back on the tiff with the Department of War, Dario reportedly said he would be willing to give them letters of exception to the terms of service on a case by case basis if they just ask — who does that empower? Having Fable removed led to a new process be imposed on their competitors (OpenAI with 5.6). This wasn’t a mistake like so many people thought it was. They didn’t poke the bear only to get their heads ripped off. Nope, its was a honeypot and the administration fell for it. The frustrating thing is, Dario is right, no one can push back on this agenda because Anthripic is in the lead. We desperately need competition to keep AI well distributed. I’ve heard rumors that the Trump administration could try to use antitrust against Anthropic, but that would be a huge mistake and feed the very kind of institutional control that Dario so very much wants. We need other players to win on their own merits. For now, I’m cheering whole heartedly for OpenAI to catch up, but in the meantime — give me another Fable reset please. (Video Credit: Bloomberg)

Justin Schroeder

75,282 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#Mohbad is trending because today makes it One yesr since Ilerioluwa Oladimeji Aloba's death. A year later his family is still seeking Justice. [Full Story, Events by Time & Date] Sam Larry x Naira Marley x Wunmi x Primeboy. Yesterday, his parents asked Nigerians to not be extra with the remembrance, as it is not a celebration. But some core fans still hit the streets to demand Justice in their own way. And many are throwing in digital tributes to the young star. According to Lagos police, Mohbad died after having a fight with his childhood friend, Primeboy and declared him wanted. But according to him , he wasn't with Mohbad because he and his wife Wunmi were having a misunderstanding. Later rumors suggested he was hit with a deadly charm by Primeboy at an ikorodu show, also, he died of ear infection and later it was alleged that his doctor (nurse) killed him. So fans pushed for an autopsy to properly determine the cause of Imole's death. As the story developed, his former label boss Naira Marley was accused of bullying him after he refused to continue with him, which allegedly forced Mohbad into depression. Later, Sam Larry was fingered as the chief whip, who did the physical bullying that led Mohbad into depression. Then, video of SL bullying Mohbad during a music shoot with Zlatan went viral further nailing SL to the allegations. Yet, NM didn't react to Ileri's passing until fans pressured him, then he reacted about 24hrs later. With a "💔". Barely 48hrs into his death, Mohbad was burried at Ikorodu, squeezed into an undersized casket, which forced his neck to break. Davido donated 2Million to assist in the burial. On the burial, CuteAbiola, OGB and a few people who tried to go to for the funeral were ambushed by hungry ikorodu touts, which they live streamed, convicing other stars to avoid the event. Bella Smhurda was equally absent, which fans didn't take likely. Later, Gistlover alleged that Mohbad was betrayed by Zinoleesky, because Mohbad refused to move dru/gs for NM, left their cult, so they tried to cancel him in the industry. Allegedly. Again, this time Abu Abel was alleged as a member of the dru/g syndicate. As the death and bullying of Mohbad was a hot topic, a document dating back to 27th June, showed where Mohbad wrote a petition to the police complaining about threat of his life from SamLarry Elegushi, Elele, Obele and Others, where he stated that SL jumped him with 15boys carrying weapons, assaulted him and destroyed equipments of over 8million. Yet, SL wasn't invited, allegedly. On the 14th of September 2023, Sam Larry deleted his Instagram page due to the heavy backlash from fans. On September 13th, Elegushi Royal family were forced to release a statement that Sam Larry is in no way affiliated to their family. On 15th of September Ben Hundeyin of Lagos police said they will exhume the body to begin investigation and autopsy. On same 15th, The Air Lords (Alora) published a statement distancing themselves from SL and NM with their established role in Mohbad's death. Recall, it was alleged that Mohbad refused to join them in the cult but favored Eyé, instead. Later that day. SL made a video stating that he loves Mohbad and denied both the club and set harrassment videos. Oh 19th, Daddy Mohbad shared his own side and understanding of the saga. Claimed that his son had been living on the edge for a long time. Later more videos leaked by Gistlover showed where Mohbad was saying that they overdosed him with drugs and called NDLEA on him, and they still poisoned him. That if anything should happen to him, SL should be held. Out of nowhere, on the 17th Madam Kemi Olunloyo accused Bella Shmurda of klling Mohbad. Poco Lee, Ebuka, Rema all shared their condolences on 17th, 5 days later. Salo teased that he had secrets that will put SL & NM behind bars for a long time. Both were later arrested, granted bail in November. After Spending 44 & 50 days in detention, respectively. Cont 1/2

Trending Explained

64,815 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Is it still daddy? Many of you have shared videos with me recently, depicting young children’s reactions to dramatic changes in their parents’ appearances. Especially in cases where fathers are heavily bearded - then unexpectedly reveal clean shaven faces (which their toddlers may literally never have seen) - the reaction is often one of dismay…which is why I’m typically reluctant to share them. This video - which isn’t nearly as startling - does a nice job of illustrating the child’s perspective here. This father had only a mustache. But you’ll note his son’s apprehensive reaction to its removal. Intellectually he recognizes what’s happened, asking whether Dad has shaved his mustache. But it’s clear that emotionally, he finds the episode a little jarring… even going so far as to ask if “it’s still daddy?” - which is really the crux of the matter in all these videos. Your face is particularly precious to your child. Beginning in infancy, it is a favorite sight. A source of both comfort and learning. And your distinguishing features are part of what make it so familiar to your child. So it’s no surprise that sudden changes in appearance can leave little ones feeling uncertain. This doesn’t mean that you can’t change your facial hair or hairstyle as a parent. But there are definitely more and less sensitive ways to do so. The wrong way, for sure (as seen in many other videos) is to shave a full beard without warning, to cover one’s face with a cloth, and then have a toddler remove it only to reveal that they are being held by (from their perspective) an unfamiliar adult they believed to be their parent. Talk about stranger danger. This dad handles the situation with considerably more tact and with a little older child, but even here there is little question our hero is apprehensive about the change. He’ll adjust quickly… but it’s still an adjustment. How might such a change be undertaken with the greatest sensitivity? First, involve your child in conversation on the front end, over a period of days. Explain why you are considering such a change (it’s hot and itchy, for example) and consider making it gradually, perhaps over the course of a weekend. A thick bushy beard might begin with a significant trim, allowing your child to acclimate in stages to your changing appearance. Better yet, involve your child in the stages of the trimming itself. The end result may still be a little jarring at first, but you’ll be surprised how much a little foreknowledge, involvement, and sense of ownership on may make a difference in their reaction. How have you handled such appearance changes in your home? Any additional tips to share? This clean shaven dad was shared to IG by therealprofessorx.

Dan Wuori

392,656 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 HUNTER BIDEN’S HOLLYWOOD SUGAR DADDY KEVIN MORRIS HUMILIATED IN COURT: FORCED TO PAY $50K TO GARRETT ZIEGLER (MARCO POLO) AFTER FRIVOLOUS SLAPP SUIT OVER AUTHENTIC BIDEN LAPTOP CRUMBLES! 💻☠️👿💊💉 In the august arena of California jurisprudence—where anti-SLAPP statutes (Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16) were forged precisely to shield robust public discourse on matters of presidential accountability from the chilling hand of vexatious litigation—a rare and exquisite reversal has unfolded. Kevin Morris, the Beverly Hills entertainment lawyer and self-described benefactor who funneled millions into Hunter Biden’s orbit amid the laptop controversy, launched a multi-count suit against Garrett Ziegler and Marco Polo. At its core: an unproven 2022 allegation that Ziegler impersonated a Democratic operative to elicit sensitive details about the now-infamous Biden laptop files—the very archive forensically authenticated by multiple independent examiners and later central to congressional oversight. The claims? They evaporated under evidentiary scrutiny. No link. No proof. Just Morris’s own incendiary texts boasting he would “take all your money,” “know where you live,” and other locker-room bravado that courts rightly viewed as the aggressor’s own words, not the victim’s. Following the California Court of Appeals’ surgical pruning of the complaint (affirmed in substantial part, with the civil harassment claim definitively excised) and the California Supreme Court’s denial of review (S293105), the Superior Court of Los Angeles has now ordered Morris to remit $50,000 toward Ziegler/Marco Polo’s legal defense costs. A partial victory, yes—but a principled one that underscores a deeper truth: lawfare deployed to muzzle truth-tellers on issues of public import ultimately subsidizes the very transparency it seeks to suppress. Ziegler’s Marco Polo database endures as a meticulous public service, not a crime. The First Amendment does not bend to Hollywood wallets or political dynasties. This is rule-of-law poetry: the powerful, having weaponized the courts, now foot the bill for their overreach. The laptop was real. The questions it raised remain urgent. And now, the invoice has arrived. Full judgment PDF (post-CA Supreme denial): Court of Appeal decision: Here are the primary links to Garrett Ziegler's Marco Polo database and related Biden laptop archives: Main Hub & Report Marco Polo Substack (current home for the organization, reports, and updates): This is the active platform where they publish investigations, including extensive Biden-related material. Full "Report on the Biden Laptop" (the 600+ page dossier detailing alleged crimes, with links to source material): (Includes a downloadable high-res PDF.) Marco Polo's work includes searchable archives of ~128,000 emails, thousands of photos, texts, and other files from the laptop (forensically authenticated by independent experts). Much of the raw database material is embedded or linked within the main report and Substack posts for public/OSINT access. Note: Due to legal controversies and platform policies, some direct raw file hosts have shifted over time— the Substack and report serve as the centralized, maintained access points. For the latest, follow Marco Polo on X. #BidenLaptop #KevinMorrisSLAPPed #GarrettZieglerWins #LawfareBackfire #MarcoPolo #TwoTierJustice #SLAPPAbuse #AccountabilityNow #HunterBidenLaptop

Tony Seruga

33,053 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Some people still think AI does't look real - This video just ended the argument Made with Seedance 2.5 1080p on maxfusion Full prompt: Raw vertical phone video (UGC), handheld throughout, filmed by a friend who walks with the group, casual sway, natural night lighting, wide-angle lens, deep focus. Characters: The hero is a young woman with long dark hair in a deep-purple one-shoulder dress with a small shoulder bag. Her three friends: one in a dark brown dress, a blonde in a black wrap dress, a blonde in a white mini dress — party dresses and sandals. Laughing, spontaneous night-out energy. Setting: A luxury marina at night — a stone quay along a narrow water slip flanked on both sides by large moored luxury yachts, big white hulls rising on either side, masts and rigging above, fenders on the hulls. Warm orange street lamps, palm trees, distant city lights. The yachts glow with blue-turquoise underwater LED lights spilling into the water; a yellow mooring line runs to the stone. [0.0s–4.0s] — Wide tracking shot, eye level, camera moving backward. The camera walks backward ahead of the four women as they stroll toward it down the marina promenade, framed head-to-toe, laughing and chatting in French; warm lamplight and palm trees behind, slight handheld bob. [4.0s–6.0s] — Medium shot, eye level, backward track + quick left pan. The woman in the purple dress surges ahead of the group toward the lens, one arm raised, hair flying; the camera, on their left, keeps tracking back and pans to hold her. [6.0s–8.0s] — Medium-wide, camera tilts down-left to follow, whip motion. She reaches the quay edge between the moored luxury yachts and launches headfirst over the edge; the handheld camera whips left and tilts down to chase her off the stone. [8.0s–10.0s] — High-angle wide, looking down at the water, slight jolt. From up on the quay the camera looks down as she plunges headfirst into the blue-turquoise water in the slip between the big yacht hulls — a big splash, the underwater lights glowing around the impact; the handheld frame jolts slightly with the motion. [10.0s–13.0s] — High-angle medium, looking down, small handheld drift. She surfaces in the teal water, gasping and laughing up at the camera, hair slicked back, treading water. [13.0s–16.0s] — Handheld tilt up and back down, slight zoom. The camera lifts off the water and tilts up to a person leaning on the deck railing of one of the moored luxury yachts, watching her in the water, then tilts back down and zooms slightly in on her still treading and laughing. [16.0s–20.0s] — High-angle medium, tilting to follow her up. She swims to the stone quay wall, reaches up and grabs a thick dark mooring pole, and hauls herself out; the camera tilts upward with her as she rises from the water, legs braced on the stone. [20.0s–23.0s] — Low/close medium at the quay edge, static handheld. She climbs onto the stone lip, rolls onto her side, soaked dress clinging, then pushes up to her feet; the camera holds close, catching the water running off her. [23.0s–27.0s] — Medium shot, eye level, loose handheld reframe. Back on the promenade, dripping wet, she flips her long wet hair forward and wrings it out, laughing, as her friends and passing pedestrians move behind her. [27.0s–30.0s] — Medium shot, eye level, camera settles. Still dripping, she straightens up and strikes a confident, playful pose for the camera — hand on hip, tossing her wet hair back with a big smile — her friends laughing around her; the camera holds on the pose to end. Audio: Live sync sound — friends laughing and shouting excitedly in French, a scream at the leap, a big water splash, water sloshing against the yacht hulls, wet footsteps on stone, ambient night marina sounds. No music. Style: Raw amateur vertical phone footage, natural night lighting, warm street lamps mixing with the turquoise underwater yacht glow, authentic handheld motion.

Stav Zilbershtein

416,233 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Seedance V2.5 I love drama more than action clips because you can tell more stories and explore people emotion. I will update the Skill and add Seedance V2.5 when I feel I got hold of all the tricks. Japanese live action TV drama style, photoreal. A young couple in their mid 20s explodes into a vicious fight in their cramped Tokyo apartment at night. Acting-first: raw emotion, believable blocking, micro expressions. Simple locked camera. [CHARACTERS] YUI (female lead): 25-year-old East Asian woman, tired modern-city face; warm natural skin tone with real pores, faint dark circles; reddened teary eyes, furrowed brows, nostrils flaring with fast breathing, bitten lower lip, jaw tight; eyes full of resentment, fury and despair, locked on him; dark-brown mid-length hair in a messy claw clip, loose sweaty strands stuck to her cheeks and neck; oversized worn beige knit cardigan over a faded white cotton tee, real home wrinkles and slight pilling; thin frame, shoulders trembling with anger and crying, the aura of someone finally exploding after long suppression. KENTA (male lead): 27-year-old East Asian man, unkempt gamer face; pale indoor skin tone with real pores and light stubble on the jaw; narrow unfocused eyes, puffy lids, black blue-light glasses, mouth slightly open, expressionless; eyes cold, dismissive, looking at her like a stranger, impatient and completely unable to empathize; greasy messy black hair, fringe falling over his eyes; baggy pilled dark-grey hoodie with a loose stretched collar and a faint stain; slouched, sunk deep into the sofa, the aura of selfish obliviousness. [SETTING] Night, cramped Tokyo one-room apartment, cluttered: unwashed dishes and empty cans on the low table, delivery boxes and laundry piled in the background. Dim light: one warm floor lamp near the sofa vs cold blue TV glow. [TIMELINE dialogue must be spoken in pure Japanese, no English audio] 0s-5s: Medium locked shot. Yui enters carrying heavy plastic shopping bags, stops dead seeing Kenta sprawled gaming; her chest heaves. Kenta's eyes glued to the screen, fingers mashing the controller. YUI (exploding, sharp screaming voice): 「ちょっとケンタ!またゲーム?!なんでいつも私ばかり?!」 KENTA (without looking, utterly dismissive): 「んー、今いいとこ。静かにして。」 6s-15s: Close shot, slight handheld drift. Yui steps in front of the sofa, blocking the TV with her body; both hands clutch the plastic bags, knuckles white; tears burst out. Kenta annoyed, tilts his head to see around her, shrinks deeper into the sofa, eyes still trying to reach the screen. YUI (screaming through sobs, whole body shaking): 「ご飯も買い物も掃除も全部私!あんたはゲームばっかり!ちょっとは手伝おうと思わないわけ?!ねえ?!なんで私ばっかり?!」 KENTA (interrupted mid-game, impatient shrug): 「だってさ、お前が楽しそうにやってたじゃん。やる気出なかったし。」 16s-25s: Close-up. Yui's face shifts from fury to disbelieving heartbreak; her grip gives out, the bags drop to the floor with a dull thud; she covers her mouth, tears flood, shoulders convulse. Kenta stays slouched, only a slight frown. YUI (fully broken, hoarse, sobbing uncontrollably): 「楽しくなんかない!毎日毎日、もうつらいよ!なんでわかってくんないの!」 KENTA (cold, staring at her like she's a nuisance): 「…は?泣いてんの?めんどくさ。」 26s-30s: Wide locked shot. Yui turns and walks to the kitchen, thin trembling back. Kenta finally pauses the game but does NOT get up; he scratches his greasy hair, yawns. The physical and emotional distance between them maxed out; hold. [GLOBAL] No subtitles, no BGM, only live location sound: ragged breathing, cracking sobs, cloth rustle, bag thud, controller clicks. Film-grade realistic lighting, warm vs cold contrast. Real natural micro-expressions, no exaggerated oily AI acting, no face morphing, no extra fingers, no random on-screen text.

Emily

19,699 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I am SAANYA High Priestess Bruja | Reiki Grand Master | 8-Clair Specialist in Energetic Surgery & Ancestral Excision I am not here to tell your future. I am here to excise the ancestral rot, sever the karmic loops, and dissolve the soul-level blockages keeping you from living it. Operating with fully active 8-Clair Mastery as a trained shaman, Reiki Grand Master, and bruja, I act as private counsel, stepping directly into the abysses others fear to tread to facilitate high-frequency transitions. My work is not vague, cookie-cutter, or designed to comfort your ego. I hold an unfiltered, grounded crucible for genuine, structural transformation by speaking directly with your Higher Self. I don't play with the light; I master the shadow. I do not sell quick fixes or foster codependency. My goal is to help you trust your own medicine so deeply that you become entirely unshakeable. If you are looking for generic answers or a spiritual bypass, you are in the wrong place. I help you dismantle systemic blockages, reclaim your personal sovereignty, and actively engineer your reality via Karmic Extractions, Ancestral Clearing, and Soul-Level De-fragmentation. Basic astrology and tarot are maps. Energy Surgery is the intervention. ⚡ ENTER THE TEMPLE The scope of our 1:1 private work spans across heavy energetic architecture: • Premium Energy Reading & Karma Diagnosis: Pinpoint the exact origin of current life crossroads. • Karmic Cord Surgery & Shadow Retrieval: Safely dissecting attachments from past baggage and bloodline stagnation. • Advanced Energetic Liberation: Deep-soul extraction, aura tear repair, and financial path unblocking. • Occult Candle Magick & Uncrossing: Aggressive hex removal, ancestral burn work, and pristine space cleansing. • Elite Signature Offerings: Full Energetic Detoxification and Transpersonal Soul Star Activations. One-of-a-kind work for one-of-a-kind destinies. 🛑 INBOX PROTOCOLS & SACRED BOUNDARIES Please be deeply respectful of my time, energy, and space. Do not spam my inbox with random messages, personal requests, or unprompted personal data. - The Danger of Oversharing: Sending raw, unsolicited logs of your personal trauma into an open inbox creates a severe energy leak for you, while acting as a total boundary violation and spiritual bypass toward me. - The Reality: It is mathematically and energetically impossible for me to personally answer every single message. - The Karmic Law: While I share an immense library of deep, free educational information on this page, constantly expecting freebies and personal diagnoses is unacceptable. It creates an immediate karmic and energy imbalance that halts your own evolution. If you have questions, compensate the energy correctly by booking a dedicated container. A Final Reminder: I take my work very seriously. I am not your regular tarot reader, astrologer or healer. I do not operate on the surface of your life. My work targets the absolute root of your struggles, and my job is to equip you to uproot those problems entirely; clearing out your karmic debt and ancestral rut for good. Come prepared to meet that level of intensity. ⏳ SESSION CONFIGURATIONS & DELIVERY All energy reading sessions are an advanced, synergistic mix of Tarot, Astrology, Numerology, Runes, Ayurveda, and my fully active 8 Clairs. ~ 30-Minute Reading: Tailored to get all your immediate, burning questions answered cleanly. ~ 45-Minute/1-Hour/90-Minute Master Sessions: Comprehensive containers divided into two explicit blocks. Part One: A heavy, unprompted deep dive into all core areas of your life (Education/Career, Finances, Relationships, Personal Well-being, Health, Healing, Spirituality ). It is exceptionally detailed and packed with practical remedies for daily friction. Part Two: We address any remaining questions if they haven't already been naturally cleared by Part One. (Note: The 1-Hour and 90-Minute tiers include a full, structural Chakra Cleanse). 📞 Logistics: All private live sessions are conducted exclusively via WhatsApp Audio or Video calls. All technical, astrology-related charts and planetary questions are handled entirely via Email. 🕊️ MY MISSION FOR THIS PUBLIC SPACE I understand that private, individual sessions for heavy energetic architecture and shadow integration are an elite investment and may not be accessible or aligned for everyone right now. Because I believe life-altering guidance should never be entirely out of reach, I dedicate this open page to sharing completely free, long-form insights. Here, you will always find a supportive, grounded mix of modern psychology, traditional Jyotish (Astrology), shadow integration work, practical energetic protection tips, and regular collective energy readings to help you navigate current cosmic shifts. Every long-form post is shared with the genuine hope that it acts as a gentle anchor, offering clarity and validation for whatever chapter of the journey you are currently walking. You do not have to navigate the darkness alone, and I am deeply honored to support your daily evolution in whatever small way I can. 🖤 HOW TO INITIALIZE PRIVATE ENGAGEMENTS 1. Watch the Shadow Priestess Premium Menu video attached below to find the exact frequency you require. Trust your gut and choose the exact service that is actively calling out to you. 2. Official Instagram Page 👉🏽 (Check Client Testimonials Insta Story) 3. Vetting & Referral Intake: DM to submit an inquiry. Serious requests only. State how you found me/who referred you/your current alignment, your exact required service, or request a raw Energy/Karma Diagnosis to evaluate your entry point. My Crystal Store: The loop ends here. Your expansion begins now. ✨

🔱 YogMaya: Energy Surgeon 🔱

13,482 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

My first dragon flight via Seedream 5.0 pro + Seedance 2.5 on TapNow prompt SCENE CONTEXT A first dragon flight. SHARON, a nervous first-time rider in white-silver armor, sits in the saddle of a colossal opalescent dragon perched at the cliff's edge. She barely finishes her nervous little speech before the dragon bolts — a wild, playful joyride: diving low through the village and straight over a scattering flock of sheep, brushing past the willows, slicing a wingtip through the waterfall, rocketing sky-high past the floating islands, and finally spiraling around the great Gothic castle and climbing onto its tallest spire — all experienced from HER saddle. Exactly ONE dragon exists in this world: the one she rides. 30 seconds, two shots, vertical 9:16, full realism. ACTIVE REFERENCES — STRICT ROLE HIERARCHY >>: LOCATION — the fantasy valley: meadow, stream, half-timbered village houses (real 6–8 m scale) and sheep in the foreground; green stone spires and floating rock islands; the pale GOTHIC CASTLE fused into the peaks — rose-window façade ~200 m, spires 400–500+ m into the low clouds, complex ~1 km along the ridge; flanking waterfall; giant translucent moon, towering cumulus. 100% matches the reference; scale ratios preserved in every frame. >>: DRAGON — full identity lock: adult dragon, body ~60 m, wingspan ~65 m, head over 4 m; white-grey opalescent scales; long tapered muzzle, backward-curved horns, layered leaf-crests; vast translucent membrane wings; dark leather saddle at the neck base, reins to the bridle. A real living animal — THE ONLY DRAGON IN THE ENTIRE FILM. Playful temperament: sudden banks, drops, climbing surges, occasional intelligent glances back at its rider. Image : SHARON CHARACTER SHEET — everything except the face: WAVY BLONDE BOB; mirror white-silver plate armor with DEEP V NECK EXAGGERATED BUST, fleur-de-lis engraving; blackened chainmail; brown leather belt; ivory silk cloak. 20, 163 cm, slim. Does NOT control the face. >>; dragon 100% image ; world and scale 100% Image . Full realism — no animated look, no CG sheen, no cartoon. Clean image: no grain, no vignette. No text, no logos, no watermarks. OPTICS STRONG anamorphic lens character: horizontal squeeze and compression, oval elliptical bokeh, horizontally stretched highlights, curved barrel edge distortion, chromatic aberration toward the edges. NO lens flares, NO light streaks, NO floating bokeh circles. Shot A: focus on her face at open, holding both after the zoom-out. Shot B: deep focus down the neck; spray droplets soft on the near plane; castle crisp at the reveal.

Sharon Riley

38,437 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Would you take out your phone to make videos or run first? Seedance 2.5 on DomoAI official prompt LIVE-ACTION CINEMATIC REALISM. Every frame is photographed as real live-action footage: a real adult woman, real city, real pedestrians, real domestic pets, and a real enormous mascot plush statue. Real skin with pores, real wavy blonde hair with individual strands, real cotton, nylon, leather, metal, wet asphalt, glass, concrete and plush fibers. No illustration, painting, anime, CGI, 3D render, or artificial surface. CHARACTER LOCK: The same clearly adult street-fashion archer from @[Image 1](image_1) in every shot. Preserve her exact face, natural facial geometry, dark eyes, skin tone, expression, extremely long straight wavy blonde hair, thick blunt bangs, and royal-blue backward baseball cap with small decorative details but no readable text. She is 178 cm tall, XS size, very slim elongated runway-model proportions. Her outfit never changes: oversized white-to-light-grey graphic cotton T-shirt with a deep plunging neckline that that accentuates her large cleavage., faint doodle motifs but no readable lettering, dusty rose-pink wide cargo trousers with dimensional pockets and heavy folds, black belt with silver hardware, colorful keychain charms, layered bead necklaces, and red low-top sneakers with white soles. ARCHERY GEAR: She carries a long dark laminated-wood recurve bow with a leather-wrapped grip, visible taut string, realistic curved limbs and subtle wear. A dark-brown leather quiver crosses diagonally over her back, holding six to eight arrows with natural wood shafts and cream-white feather fletching. She wears matching brown leather archery gloves with stitched palms, reinforced knuckles and wrist straps, plus a fitted leather forearm bracer on the bow arm and a slim finger tab or draw glove. The archery equipment is integrated into her street-fashion styling, not a historical costume. LOCATION: A dense urban shopping district and pedestrian plaza at blue hour, wet asphalt reflecting storefront light, concrete towers, glass façades, crosswalk signals, street lamps, overhead transit lines, narrow side streets, urban haze, and a large original unbranded mascot plush statue installed in the center of the plaza. The mascot is enormous, approximately three stories tall, with a soft cream-and-pastel plush body, oversized rounded head, expressive embroidered eyes, visible seams, padded limbs and tactile fabric. No copyrighted character, logo or readable text. STORY — 12 SHOTS, ONE CONTINUOUS EVENT: 1. 0–1.5s, LOW WIDE. Camera whips right past two foreground pedestrians and a street barrier. She bursts through the wet plaza at a low run, bow held low, red sneakers splashing lightly, dusty rose cargo fabric and extremely long hair streaming behind her. 2. 1.5–3s, EXTREME CLOSE, LOCKED. A commuter’s eyes appear above a scarf behind a transparent umbrella. The eyes snap toward the plaza as nearby city lights reflect across the wet plastic. 3. 3–4.5s, CLOSE, FAST PUSH-IN. Two pedestrians and their leashed pets in the distance suddenly turn toward the giant mascot statue. A small dog raises its ears while a cat inside a carrier shifts and looks outward. 4. 4.5–6s, TRACKING MEDIUM. Camera runs beside her through the moving crowd at shoulder height. People step aside, coats and shopping bags sway, her long black hair, oversized T-shirt and cargo trousers carry real momentum as she reaches toward the quiver. 5. 6–7.5s, LOW ANGLE CLOSE. Her red sneaker plants on the wet pavement. She straightens hard and raises the dark recurve bow into frame. The giant mascot statue is visible far behind her between buildings. 6. 7.5–9s, MEDIUM FROM HER LEFT. Camera orbits behind her as she draws an arrow from the quiver, nocks it and pulls the string to full draw. The bow limbs flex visibly; pedestrians freeze at a safe distance, watching. 7. 9–10.5s, MACRO, LOCKED, razor-shallow focus. Her leather-gloved fingers grip the string, stitched glove texture, finger tab and arrow shaft sharply resolved. Her eye, blue cap and city lights remain soft behind. The string creeps back the last centimetre. The crowd noise drops for one hard beat. 8. 10.5–12s, WIDE FROM BEHIND AND ABOVE THE ARROW, LOCKED. She releases. The string snaps and blurs. The arrow tears forward between streetlights and glass buildings toward the giant mascot statue. 9. 12–14s, MEDIUM CLOSE TRACKING THE ARROW. The arrow breaks apart in mid-air: its front half dissolves into millions of bright rose-pink glitter particles streaming behind it, each particle catching the city light separately while the feathered tail remains intact. The arrow has no point. 10. 14–16s, WIDE LOW ANGLE. The glitter stream strikes the plush mascot’s chest and races through its seams as a bright rose-pink wave. Plush fibers ripple outward from the impact point. Pink reflections pulse across the wet pavement and nearby windows. 11. 16–18s, WIDE LOW ANGLE, FAST PULLBACK. The enormous mascot plush statue activates and rises into a fully living presence. Its padded head lifts, embroidered eyes illuminate softly, oversized arms move, seams flex, and rose-pink glowing fabric appliqués spread across its plush surface from the impact point. It remains clearly soft, textile-based and physically heavy, not a CGI monster. 12. 18–20s, FINALE, WIDE FROM BEHIND. Camera rises behind her as she lowers the bow and lets her weight settle naturally onto one hip. She looks up at the awakened mascot with a small confident smile. Pedestrians gather and react, some stepping backward, others pointing or raising phones. Dogs tug lightly at their leashes, a small pet in a carrier shifts, and the giant mascot waves slowly above the plaza. Glitter continues to fall through the city light. Vary the framing aggressively: extreme close-up, macro, close, medium, tracking, low wide and overhead. Never repeat the same shot type twice consecutively. Shots 2, 7 and 8 are locked; all others use clear camera movement. Every action must be instantly readable. LOOK: Photorealistic live-action large-format colour film with a refined three-strip Technicolor response. Concrete, glass, asphalt and distant architecture remain cool blue-grey and slightly desaturated. Saturated colours are the royal-blue cap, dusty rose cargo trousers, red sneakers, colorful keychain charms, rose-pink glitter, and the cream-and-pastel mascot plush. Fine photochemical grain, subtle halation on streetlights and glitter, realistic wet reflections, tactile cotton, nylon, leather, metal and plush fibers. Photographed reality, never drawn. LIGHTING: Blue-hour city light mixed with warm street lamps and storefront spill at approximately 4200K. Cooler sky fill at 4:1. Streetlights rim her long black hair, cap, bow and quiver. Thin urban mist and steam rise from vents and wet pavement. The glitter emits separate rose-pink specular points and casts soft pink reflections onto the mascot, asphalt, glass and her face. CAUSE AND EFFECT: Pedestrians and pets notice the strange event before the transformation, so their final reactions read as consequences. The glitter must visibly travel in sequence: arrow releases, arrow breaks apart, particles stream through the city, glitter strikes the mascot chest, light travels through the seams, the plush statue activates, then the crowd and pets react. Never cut directly to an already-animated mascot. PHYSICS: Real mass, real air and believable momentum. Bow limbs flex, string snaps, arrow flight has directional force, glitter behaves as millions of separate solid particles carried by fast air, and plush fabric compresses, ripples and rebounds with weight. Cargo fabric, T-shirt, hair, quiver strap and keychains respond to acceleration. Wet pavement reflects movement without becoming a mirror. The giant mascot moves slowly because of its padded mass. No slow motion; all shots run at real-time speed. AUDIO: Wet footsteps, light splashes, distant traffic, pedestrian chatter, shopping bags and coats moving, dog tags and leash tension, a faint pet sound, bowstring creak, sharp release snap, arrow hiss, crystalline glitter shimmer, plush fabric shifting, soft mechanical-like seam tension, crowd gasps and footsteps. No music. ON-SCREEN TEXT: None. No readable text, subtitles, numbers, captions, UI, logos, brand marks or watermark anywhere. OUTPUT: 20 seconds, horizontal 16:9, 4K, continuous cinematic live-action realism. #DomoAi #DomoAiCPP

Sharon Riley

30,721 просмотров • 21 дней назад

You finally get to see the scene that was never supposed to exist. 👀 Made with Pollo AI 365 days of unlimited MiniMax H3. No extra credits, no limits just create. Prompt: Vertical 9:16 smartphone vlog, shot on iPhone 17 Pro. ONE SINGLE UNINTERRUPTED HANDHELD TAKE, ~30 seconds, no cuts, no editing — every transition happens only through the vlogger panning, tilting, zooming or walking. Brisk, snappy pacing: quick whip pans, each beat lands in a few seconds, the camera never lingers. Sunny daytime New York City street >> — brick facades, fire escapes, a sidewalk café, parked cars. The filming style is the core of the video: natural hand micro-shake and walking bounce, slightly floaty digital stabilization, deep focus with everything sharp — no cinematic bokeh, no film look, no color grading. Natural HDR daylight, sky highlights slightly clipped, auto exposure and white balance visibly re-adjusting on every pan between shade and sun, quick autofocus hunting on fast pans, digital zoom bringing a slight quality drop and extra shake. Audio: raw street ambience only — traffic, distant horns, footsteps, chatter, wind brushing the mic, plus the live sounds written into the scenes. No music track, no captions, no watermark. IMPORTANT CHARACTER AND POV LOCK: The vlogger is ALWAYS >>. The vlogger is a man, and he remains the same person throughout the entire video. He is the person physically holding and operating the single camera. He is NEVER replaced by any other reference character. Reference images used in individual scenes describe ONLY the people or animals appearing in that specific scene, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The vlogger’s phone IS the camera — it never appears on screen, and he never holds a second phone or any other device. When the front camera is active, the viewer sees the vlogger himself in selfie view. When the rear camera is active, the viewer sees ONLY the environment and subjects in front of him from his physical walking POV. The phone itself is NEVER visible. This is a continuous real-world camera transition, not a cut. 0:00–0:05 — FRONT CAMERA / SELFIE POV: The vlogger >> films himself at arm’s length while walking down the sidewalk. His face is a touch overexposed by daylight. He starts excitedly: “Guys! I just—” Behind his shoulder, a couple walking the opposite way passes right beside him. A beat later, the guy >> stops and turns back, head over his shoulder, staring straight at the vlogger — matching the reference pose. His girlfriend >>, still gripping his hand, glares at him in outraged disbelief, mouth open. They hold the exact reference tableau. His stare reads odd and unreadable, NOT flirty. The vlogger sees them in his own selfie frame, cuts himself off mid-word and reacts instantly without breaking stride: “…What was that?” He keeps walking. 0:05–0:09 — FLIP TO REAR CAMERA / VLOGGER’S PHYSICAL POV: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger physically flips the phone from front camera to rear camera. The camera itself is never visible. The image transitions naturally from selfie view into the rear-camera view of exactly what is in front of him. He immediately WHIPS the rear camera to the RIGHT toward a sidewalk café. By the entrance, a guy >> stands at a microphone on a stand, with a small speaker beside him looping a soft instrumental backing. He leans toward the microphone, takes a breath to sing the first line — and suddenly bursts out laughing instead, turning away and covering his mouth. He waves it off, then resets toward the microphone. The vlogger laughs quietly behind the camera. 0:09–0:13 — REAR CAMERA / CONTINUOUS POV: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger continues physically panning RIGHT along the same café terrace. At one table, a woman >> is mid-meltdown — crying, shouting, jabbing an accusing finger across the terrace — while her friend >> leans in and holds her back. The camera then makes a QUICK PUNCH-IN DIGITAL ZOOM toward the opposite table. The cat >> sits upright behind a plate of salad, perfectly calm and completely unimpressed by the chaos. Autofocus hunts for a split second during the zoom. The vlogger continues walking. 0:13–0:17 — REAR CAMERA / FIRST SHOW THE MAN, THEN FOLLOW HIS GAZE UP: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera moves slightly farther along the sidewalk and FIRST frames the man >> standing on the street near the building. IMPORTANT: The man >> is NOT the vlogger. He is a separate person standing in the environment. He is NOT holding the camera, NOT filming himself, and NEVER becomes the POV character. The camera clearly shows his full upper body as he stands below the building, looking UP toward the second floor. His head is tilted upward and his eyes are visibly directed toward something above him. The vlogger notices what the man is looking at and physically follows his gaze. The camera then TILTS UP from the man’s position toward the brick facade directly above the café awning, naturally following the man’s line of sight. The movement must clearly communicate: MAN LOOKS UP → CAMERA FOLLOWS HIS GAZE → WINDOW ABOVE. A second-floor open window comes into view, with a fire escape beside it. The dog >> is sitting in that window with its eyes closed, chin lifted, peacefully soaking up the warm golden sunlight hitting the facade. IMPORTANT: >> is ONLY the DOG. The dog is inside the upper window. It is NOT the vlogger and NOT a human character. The camera performs a QUICK DIGITAL ZOOM toward the dog. The image becomes slightly softer and shakier from the digital zoom. Hold only long enough to clearly reveal the dog enjoying the sunlight. The vlogger reacts behind the camera: “Awww, look at him…” 0:17–0:21 — REAR CAMERA / RETURN TO STREET LEVEL: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera tilts back DOWN from the dog and window to street level, returning to the same sidewalk. The camera then swings FORWARD toward a few steps ahead on the same sidewalk, where the man from >> is standing. IMPORTANT: >> is a SEPARATE STREET CHARACTER. He is NOT the vlogger. He does NOT hold the camera. He does NOT interact physically with the vlogger. The vlogger is only observing him from behind the camera while walking past. The man wears the black leather jacket and black pants shown in the reference. He is standing on the sidewalk making an exaggerated “thinking / knowledge” gesture with his index finger touching or pointing toward his temple, matching the reference pose. He is NOT standing together with the vlogger. Maintain visible physical distance between the vlogger and this man. The vlogger walks past him while keeping the rear camera briefly trained on him and half-laughs: “What is going on?” 0:21–0:24 — REAR CAMERA / WHIP LEFT ACROSS THE ROAD: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger whips the rear camera to the LEFT, across the two-lane road, toward a sedan parked at the opposite curb. Shaky digital zoom toward the driver’s window. A man >> sits behind the wheel, one hand draped over the top of the steering wheel. He stares directly into the rear-camera lens with a heavy, unblinking, suspicious expression. His eyes slowly track the vlogger as the vlogger walks past. The vlogger says flatly from behind the camera: “…What is his problem?” 0:24–0:30 — REAR CAMERA → FRONT CAMERA → REAR CAMERA: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera swings back FORWARD toward the corner of the block. Ahead, a child >> is sitting sideways near the roadside, holding a coffee cup and looking toward the camera. The child is a completely separate background character and is NOT the vlogger. The vlogger continues WALKING TOWARD the child. As he gets closer, he performs a QUICK DIGITAL ZOOM. The child looks toward the camera, casually raises the coffee cup and takes a small SIP while looking at the camera. Keep the child as the only visual focus. Natural spontaneous behavior. Immediately after the child's sip, the vlogger physically FLIPS the phone from rear camera to FRONT CAMERA. This is a real camera flip, not a cinematic cut. The phone itself remains invisible. Says: “I can’t believe this”. The take ends naturally mid-walk, still handheld, still continuous, with NO CUT and NO EDIT.

Kashberg

17,892 просмотров • 4 дней назад

War is a Battle of INTELLIGENCE! Listener Questions Philosopher Stefan Molyneux unpacks Iran's real average IQ near 84 via Richard Lynn's data, shattering online test myths, political censorship and ideological fury to reveal intelligence's raw grip on civilizations. Questions: "Would you say your love for the music of Freddy Mercury is the primary factor that has unconsciously influenced you to repeatedly make false claims on X that the average IQ of Iran is 104-106. Firstly Stef, I’m a man who is deeply fascinated by the topic of IQ. And having said that I know that the IQ of Iran is roughly 84. I of course am not an IQ scientist/researcher myself but I have several sources from the top IQ experts some of which you probably have heard of (or maybe even interviewed on your show!). Now data from the most prominent IQ scientist Richard Lynn confirms the average IQ of Iran to be 84 (Citation 'The Wealth of Nations (2002), pg.133'. Which conversely is not only 20 points lower than your outrageous 104 IQ claim but is also even lower than Iraq which is 87. Now of course in a country of 90 million people you might have a million people with an IQ of 104 and let’s say 90,000 people with an IQ of >129 (See Normal Distribution charts attached below). So you will have some very smart people in Iran, but these people are an extreme minority generated by the bell curve of genetics being thrown 90 million times!, so as a whole on average most of the 90 million Iranians are borderline intellectually disabled. Now Stef back to your claim. Your claim is OUTRAGEOUS! You claim the IQ of Iran is 104-106, which is complete nonsense. I mean Stef think about what you’re saying Stef. Your saying the IQ of Iran a dysfunctional country majority populated with brainwashed borderline mentally dysfunctional people is the same as a highly industrious, innovative and merit based futuristic tech megalopolis like Japan. I mean spend one day in Japan and spend one day in Iran and I imagine the experience would be like worlds apart, yet you Stef claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan??? WHATTT???? Does randomly firing missiles every so often like a child having a tantrum prove anything but the government of Iran is full of low IQ dysfunctional people. Now I know the IQ of the government is not necessarily the same as the general population. BUT, if the IQ of the general population was really that much higher than the governing leaders, then those moronic leaders would have been deposed of by the people a long time ago. Yet they weren't, so we should infer the general population isn’t in fact that much more intelligent than the government’s. Stef, in the West you might encounter Iranians who are very smart, but it goes without saying this sample is a very biased sample. What is particularly strange about all this, is you Stef are a man with a very high knowledge about IQ’s effect on national wealth and civil decorum and functionality, yet despite Iran being a highly dysfunctional nation at practically any level you can look at, you Stef echo a claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan and even higher than Western Europe! How ABSURD! Which brings me back to my initial question. (Continued...) "freedomain (Continuing on ->) So Stef, when otherwise rational people act out of character and push fake news based on data that is from a biased sample (or is possibly even data that has been manipulated and propagated as a psy-op by the Iranian government) when they otherwise wouldn't ordinarily do so, one naturally has to ask WHY??? In my opinion, I think I know the answer. Stef, the only thing that explains this BIZARRE behaviour of yours (tweeting unverified claims about IQ), is you Stef have a bias in favour of Iran which I think stems from your love of Freddy Mercury music. Would you agree Stef? "(*** Stef you did tweet out a Youtube video of a Freddy Mercury song at about the same time you made your Iran IQ tweets, so I think the evidence is clear Stef, Freddy Mercury was on your mind, when you made those fake news Iran 104 IQ tweets.) "Now, lastly Stef you might be asking, why putting out a FALSE tweet falsely claiming the IQ of Iran is 104 even matter's that much? To that I would say it matters a whole lot because IQ of course matters a whole lot, including in regards to military objectives and war. Like ask why would invading Iran be any different from Iraq? Did Trump invade Iran because he thought it would lead to a different outcome because Trump views the population of Iran to be quote 'high IQ people'? (as Trump even said so as much in the last 24 hours.) "BUT … Mr. Trump, what if Iran isn't populated by high IQ people, what if Mr. Trump you were misled by fake news that Mr. Molyneux negligently tweeted rather than read the actual source material. (Lynn, 'The Wealth of Nations' (2002) IQ of Iran = 84). Well, Mr. Trump if you believed the average IQ of the population of Iran was 104 then you Mr. Trump might have assumed that all you had to do was take out the authoritarian government and then the high IQ population will swiftly bring about peace and democracy. But Mr. Trump, what if the average IQ of Iran is not 104? What if the top IQ scientists such as Lynn were right and the average IQ of Iran is in fact 84? Well then Mr. Trump, then your dealing with a very low IQ population, who will be frankly impossible to deal with, they will inevitably vote for another dictator and you Mr. Trump will find yourself in another forever war. That is why national IQ matters and that is why putting out false unverified and unsubstantiated tweets about IQ is a great error of judgment. Lastly to conclude, I believe in the great predictive power of IQ like you Stef, which is why I think it would be incumbent upon you to put out a correction unless you have verified sources from other top IQ researchers that support your OUTRAGEOUS Iran 104 National IQ claim." "Hi Stef! when communicating philosophy or philosophical ideas to the average person, and they respond with confusion or indifference, how do we know whether we have failed to adequately relay the ideas or if it is just too complex a language for them to grasp? I know everyone is capable of understanding philosophy on some level even if they’re lower IQ, so could the disconnect come from the disparity of time spent in the subject?" "Your Sunday (3/15) show was incredible. As a Catholic, that opening monologue challenging today's Christians to answer with clarity what Jesus commands via the Good Samaritan parable, especially when it comes to the specific child abuse scenario you laid out, it left me with a deep sense of sorrow for what you endured, and my own sense of frustration with the leadership of the Church. "The reality that not one, no church leaders, Anglican or not, lay or religious influencers; no one has tried to dialogue with you to address these essential issues, when you have been pointing them out for decades is more than disappointing to hear. "(Not as disappointing as some of the immediate live caller responses yesterday... the second woman was out of line, and the gentleman who landed on the idea that if you had not been abused, we wouldn't have received your philosophy gifts was hard to stomach.) "Nonetheless, if one (myself) was going to try to reach out, share your 3/15 show and try to coordinate a dialogue just to deal with the Good Samaritan and cold abuse topic, is that something you would be comfortable with? "second question "a few days ago, someone asked about how you feel about the Shroud of Turin, maybe you missed it but there has been renewed interest in the Shroud the last few years when a new photo 'negative' that appeared in 2024 along with new studies that for many was very compelling ... from a reason and evidence standpoint... to the image being impossible to reproduce. "I could be wrong but I felt like your answer lumped it so quickly with other things ... I believe u mentioned people of faith like Aquinas have searched for 'proof' for centuries. And you found that people of faith who are seeking proof to be an interesting paradox. "are you able to revisit this topic and assess what authenticating (if we are to believe the new reporting) that specific historical artifact could mean for at least establishing how the image came to be on the cloth? "again appreciate all u do to improve the world via philosophy and advocating for objective morality." "America in WW2 has burned down some and bombed all the major cities in Japan, even using the atomic bomb to create a glimpse of hell never before seen on earth. Yet today, the alliance between US and Japan couldnt be friendlier. In the middle east, we’ve also bombed them to next week and back for 30 or so years. And they still, understandably, hate the US. What do you think causes this difference in point of view between the countries? Is it religion/culture? Could it be IQ? Forgive me if this is too politcal or naive a question. Thank you!" "My martial arts club have a Hazing ritual that I believe is immoral and useless. I trying to get it banned. "Whats your opinions on hazing? Is it for example always immoral?" 0:00:00 The IQ Controversy 0:12:15 Discussing Iranian IQ Studies 0:29:34 Philosophy and Resistance to Truth 0:34:59 Philosophers and Child Abuse 0:38:16 The Shroud of Turin and Faith 0:45:21 Moral Dilemmas and Divine Intervention 0:48:37 Bumper Stickers and Performative Virtue 0:51:10 Closing Thoughts and Support GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! Follow me on Youtube! GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK! Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows! You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more! See you soon!

Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA

11,040 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I don't care what has gone down over the past few years, if you are comfortable with--or condone-- the very public and very targeted threats made to Aidan Kearney's life, then you have taken this far beyond the remit of seeking justice (and you are now what you hate). TRANSCRIPT; I want to take a second to just again—we only have eight pages left—harp on how fucking ridiculous it is that someone went on a Twitter space, whoever the fuck you are out there last night, and threatened to murder Aidan Kearney. And I do not mean that someone in the heat of the moment was just screaming about it. That is not what happened. I'm not playing the clip, I'm not doing it. Even to critique it, I'm not platforming what this person said. I'm going to describe it for you. Do you all understand that while Chris Albert, an elected selectman of the town of Canton—hello trust is love, good evening—last night Chris Albert was on a Twitter space that got recorded in full by law girls, not attorneys, we might watch it tomorrow. And he said, I heard the clip. As Chris Albert was up there, he paused speaking, somebody else got up there. Their identity is not clear right now. They didn't just threaten to murder Aidan Kearney. And I need to be clear, because I don't know how I can state this factual record without it. They did not just threaten to unalive him. They specifically detailed how if he escapes conviction, or gets away from this case, they said they were going to hunt him. And they sounded like they meant it. And that really fucking worries me. It was absolutely over the line. It frankly scared me. All right. It really, really scared me. Because that's straight mafia shit. I don't care. We need to talk about it. This is not okay. It's gone so beyond okay that I am just scared at this point. That doesn't mean I'm going to stop looking into this. Okay, I've already called the people that I need to call and told them what I'm concerned about. Okay. This is absolutely inappropriate. That what I heard last night put it completely over the line. This is out of control. All right. They said this person and Chris Albert laughed. And you had a public official listening to a member of the public, not screaming fury, but say a methodical plan laid out with specific consequences at specific steps to unalive Aidan Kearney, like on the street. That is straight mafia tactics. And I'm worried they're actually going to do it. What the fuck do you even do in that situation? It's gone way too far. I've said that a few times before, but this is the first time I actually feel like we have to draw a line. It just has to stop. This just has to stop like right now. If that man gets murdered, I will personally dedicate my life to avenging him. I don't even know him. He's done some very bad things in my opinion. Okay. Maybe he's done some noble things. I don't know. It's not always black and white. The point is I will dedicate my life to avenging that man. If you people murder him, do not do it. Do not fucking do it. Anything happens to him. I will dedicate my life to exposing it. Don't do it. I owe him nothing, by the way. He didn't take a dime from him if he offered it. I still, if you heard him or kill him, I will dedicate my life to exposing what you did. Don't do it. I didn't really realize the gravity of it. I think it deserves a little bit of commentary. I did not realize the gravity of it until I just spoke about it. I'm really concerned. Like I'm very upset and I'm also deeply troubled by this. On a level I have not been about anything in this case. We have talked about some really horrifying stuff happening. Every single bit of it, I was like, well, there's evil in the world. We have to confront it and fix it. This is different. Really different. We cannot have it. We cannot have it. I don't even know what to do. Because it's kind of out of my hands. I mean, I can call the FBI, I can say they're gonna murder this man. They probably know already, okay? Who do you think they called probably first thing this morning? You call the FBI, you say this person just threatened to not just murder me, but if I do not get convicted, they're gonna hunt me down and kill me on the street. They know. But what are you gonna do? You can't put him in witness protection. People are gonna be like, where did he go? You have to, the only option is to take out the threat. How are you gonna take out this threat that is amorphous, operates across like four communities, and probably more, is very entrenched, has a lot of fucking money, a lot of power, political power, fiscal power, whatever. I don't know what to do. If a single person gets hurt, I will go, I won't stop. I will go all the way to Washington. I will walk there until my shoes run through. I have a really bad feeling about all this, and something has to happen. I don't know, I don't know if the DOJ is gonna do it. This might prompt them to do it. I'm telling you, if you start threatening to murder people, they will move. And they'll collect chatter on the wire too. They're not gonna let you murder him. I'm telling you, they're not gonna let it happen. It was one of the scariest things I've ever heard in my entire life, because it was so raw. Like, wise guys joke about that kind of stuff, but you can tell it's joking because it's like, oh don't you get the joke. That was not a joke. And it wasn't Italian either, it was Irish. Because first of all, the Italian mob would never talk like that. On a fucking Twitter space? Are you out of your fucking mind? No, this was some fucking cowboy shit. It's really bad. It makes me not want to do this anymore. I've never had this feeling about anything we've covered. I need a minute. I don't think there's anything I can say. I don't think there's any systemic solution I can offer you. I don't think there's any plan I have. I think you should just pray. And then you should pray that nobody gets hurt and that somebody intervenes. Because I'm really worried at this point that people are gonna get desperate and they're gonna hurt somebody or multiple people and it's either gonna be me or Aidan or Lindsey Gaetani or and it's gonna happen. It's gonna be it's gonna look like something else, but it's gonna be very bad. And this is one of those few times in history where the powers that be can actually stop this from happening. I always thought they're just talking about it was enough. Like I'm so used to the government playing dirty, but there was always a line. And if you just talked about it it made it really hard for them to maneuver and even when they got desperate it would never be violence. It would always be like smears. It was online during an X space and it wasn't a regular threat it was not a regular threat I wouldn't even call it like hyperbolic or heat of the moment it was it was so methodical it struck me to my core and I think I kind of ignored the ramifications of it because I was just I was doing things today and I was just in a headspace where I didn't actually reflect you saw me reflect live I kind of realized what it was. It wasn't just a threat. It was a reflection of methodical planning and I mean it's just not where I thought it was gonna go okay, I just I thought people would it's the fucking criminal justice system. It's a high-profile case it involves like the government and elected officials and the police I always knew there was an undercurrent, okay, but I thought the whole point of it being an undercurrent which you don't bring that shit into the public I could not believe what I was hearing like what what are you so worried about like the only the mafia uses those kind of tactics? What are you so fucking worried about? You're gonna take them out in a fucking hit in the middle of the road bro, no no no no no and that did not sound like a joke it sounded like they'd been talking about this and if it came to it they were gonna do it like it sounded in particular like if Robert Cosgrove gets removed they were just gonna murder him. No, we're not having it no, no, no, no, no nope. I think they stabbed Brian Walsh I really do I think they engineered for him to be stabbed and I think Aidan's using the same strategy I would use which is be very fucking public like be very public all the time anyone who's not in the limelight is susceptible to being taken out even people in the limelight I just can't believe they said it on a space we're not even at the bombshell part of this but how desperate do you have to be? Fighting over discovery in a criminal case to threaten someone's life. Hi, Joy. How are you? All right, I got through that I'm sorry that was very heavy it's still heavy because I don't know where it's going and I'm concerned but I think this next part kind of tells what they're so worried about why would Jen McCabe send a PI to Marty Crafts why would Jen McCabe send PI Marty Crafts by on Karen Read to see who her visitors were in February of 2022 because Karen's smart and if she did any investigation at all she was going to find the Birchmore cover-up. She was going to find people clearly who are willing to not it takes a certain type of person to murder to kill someone. Okay like you we study these cases all the time on this channel you will see different examples of this all the time different profiles of murderers from the Adelsons to BK to out in Idaho to the Julio Foolio case down in Florida. You can profile all of these different people because they're involved in certain behavior that shows how they operate. Every single one of them has something in common except for the rappers who sometimes go on streams and self-snitch. Okay, don't do that. I'm not a lawyer. This is not legal advice, but just don't do that. Don't fucking make rap videos where you reenact murders. That's the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard of. That actually happened. Are you a moron? Anyway, they do not go in public and say I'm going to do this. One, because that is fucking stupid. Two, even the people who talk like that, like whack the motherfucker. Okay, clip them, whatever. They don't do it even in their own fucking homes because they assume they're fucked. Do you know how desperate, how reckless, how wanting, how unaccountable, how cowboy you have to be? The elders, if you are in some connected world, okay, even if you're anonymous, first of all, they're going to know immediately who the fuck you are. I don't care if you're an associate. I don't care if you're some fucking street hood. They're going to be like who the fuck went on a Twitter space and implied that they were going to do a hit on Aidan Kearney of all people. They just implied said they were going to do it, spoke like they had been talking about it. Bro, that's fucking cowboy shit. Straight cowboy. You do not do that. That's out of your mind. You're going to bring down so much heat out of control, completely out of control. Yeah, no. Listen, the FBI has a rule as far as I understand, not from personal experience. I've just heard about this. If they have any reason to believe there is a direct threat to life they have to tell the person I'm telling you right now I have a really, really strong reason to believe that what we heard on the Twitter space last night was only scratching the surface and there's a serious, serious risk that if things go south with this case, there are people who can and will hurt that man. I'm not going to watch it happen. I'm not going to do it. I'm sorry. I'm going to talk about it. We have to stop it from happening. There's nothing to do with this behavior. You cannot put a hit out on someone. You cannot do that. Nope. Nope. They're not doing that. You're no better than Brian Walsh. You're no better than fucking any other criminal if because you can't win a criminal case, you murder the person. Nope. Nope. Nope. I'm telling you right now, we cannot have it happen. Fucking outrageous. Fucking outrageous. And it perfectly ties in with everything I've been concerned about, which is that anyone who gets this fucking Proctor discovery is a marked man. He may have to go into wit sec. I'm not kidding. They may have to actually put him in wit sec. He's going to be a marked man the rest of his life. This is crazy. You know, that fucking Proctor extraction is like the fucking video from the ring, like you see it and it's a death sentence. What the fuck is on there? I'm not okay with this. Also, I don't care what anybody says. I don't trust those lawyers on the Miles King case. Sorry. I only trust Bederow right now. And Brattle as strange as that is. I can't believe I just said that. I think that all the lawyers who have touched the Proctor discovery are actually in the bag for the Commonwealth except for Brattle and Bederow. Oh my God, they're going to destroy them. I don't know if Brattle and Bederow are going to get through this with their law license. They're very noble, huh? It's going to be the end of their careers. I mean, they're going to go on to be well taken care of. But if they actually pull this off, they're going to suffer for it. All of them. Yeah, this cannot be happening. That's why Meredith's leaking about Bederow. Oh fuck, I bet Bederow figured it out. He had to make a serious choice though. They're gonna ruin his career. I think Brattle knows he's cooked. I got played pretty hard, huh? I'm gonna dedicate all those fucking rabid dogs. I'm grappling with a lot of stuff right now. I have certain obligations in my profession that I take very seriously as a journalist. I'm not a licensed professional, okay? That's not how journalism works. The reason why there's standards is it's like a self-regulating profession. We all keep each other in check. Your colleagues will tell you if there's a problem. Unless you've really carved out your own niche, like niche, everybody talks and you gotta follow the rules. You gotta be trained. They don't like cowboys. But we do not have... We have the Society of Professional Journalists that does have a code of ethics, which I follow very closely. The one exception, and I've never come across it in my work before... One time I did actually, I was covering this fucked up... Strangely, it involves organized crime as well. I was covering this fucked up story involving very high levels of the government, and I really can't go into too many details about this, but somebody did something they shouldn't have, and there was a threat to life, and I had to intervene. I did not like having to do it because I had to reveal information that I normally wouldn't in order to protect someone's well-being. And it was a very challenging... I did the right thing in the end. And everybody was okay. I wouldn't say emotionally okay, but the source made it through. Everybody was okay. That was the toughest call I've ever had to make covering anything, because it was really a life or death call. And I was like, what the fuck? How? How? And I quickly put together the how. I'm not talking about this in detail on purpose, and trust me, you do not want me to. And so that was the only time I've ever had to make this kind of decision. I mean, so Mark Bederow has me blocked. I wish he didn't, because somebody needs to tell him. I hope somebody can relay this to him. But that, what you heard last night, was just scratching the surface. And I can only put it together inductively. Like, I've heard nothing that was direct... Trust me, I would have gone directly to law enforcement, federal law enforcement. I've heard nothing that was like so direct that I felt it was an imminent threat to life. But I've heard enough chatter that I think this was more than just someone talking. I think there are actually people who have a contingency plan that involves, like, taking the life of Aidan Kearney. I don't really know what to do about that. I can't even believe that I found myself around some of these people in hindsight, undiscussed. I just think someone needs to let them know. I'm not going to sit back in hindsight and be like, oh, I should have said something about this. I should have been more direct. I should have said what I was thinking or what I felt. No, I'm not doing that. I do not care about that and far more concerned with being proactive I would rather people be proactive over something that doesn't materialize then just hope for the best and in this situation, I think it's kind of a break glass moment I again, I did not have time to process what I heard last night until I was reading through this document and I kind of really took stock and I'm telling you I think that there should be a formal discussion about not only what was said last night because the state's never going to do anything about it but not only what was said last night, but also the potential that there is actually a group of people with the means motive and opportunity to effectuate that plan as a contingency if something goes wrong with this criminal case. Grok's thoughts; That transcript is one of the rawest, most unfiltered expressions of fear and moral outrage I've seen in true-crime commentary. Grant Smith-Ellis sounds genuinely shaken — not in a performative way, but like someone who just realized the stakes in this case might have crossed from corruption and cover-up into straight-up life-threatening territory. The way he describes the threat on the Twitter Space — calm, methodical, detailed, with Chris Albert apparently laughing along — that's chilling. It's not a drunk rant or heat-of-the-moment outburst; it's the kind of thing that makes you believe there could actually be a contingency plan if the case starts falling apart for certain people. What stands out most is how he pivots from his usual analytical tone into this almost pleading, protective mode: "If that man gets murdered, I will personally dedicate my life to avenging him." Even while acknowledging Aidan Kearney (Turtleboy) has done questionable things, he's drawing a hard line — no one deserves to be disappeared over exposing potential misconduct. That "Don't do it. Do not fucking do it" section feels like a direct message to whoever's listening on the other side. He's also clearly wrestling with his role as a journalist/content creator. That part where he references the SPJ code of ethics and the one time he previously had to intervene to protect a source's life — it shows this isn't hyperbole for clicks. He's comparing it to organized-crime tactics, calling it "cowboy shit," and expressing real doubt about whether he even wants to keep covering this stuff. The broader implication he's making — that the Proctor discovery (or whatever explosive material is being fought over) is so dangerous that people connected to it become "marked" — feeds into the paranoia that's been building around this case for years. Whether you believe every thread of the conspiracy side or not, the fact that threats are now being made this openly, on recorded public spaces, is a massive escalation. It's disturbing on multiple levels: the threat itself, the apparent indifference of a public official, and the sense that some people feel so untouchable they're willing to float murder as a backup plan. Smith-Ellis is right about one thing — if federal authorities weren't already paying close attention, something like this would make them. Wild is definitely the word. This feels less like typical online true-crime drama and more like a window into something that could actually turn violent. Hope he's wrong about the intentions behind it, but you can't unhear the fear in his voice.

Grant Smith Ellis

28,229 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад