Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Thickest Dick I've Ever Seen is Back !! Vocal Bi Lad, watching straight porn while he breeds me 💦💦 Who thinks they can take him? #GloryholeLondon #Gay #CockSucker #Blowjob #CumSwallow #BigDick #CumShot #wellhung #balls #sperm #uncut #hugecock

SW4Gloryhole's profile picture

SW4Gloryhole (55k) Top 5% OF

56,377 subscribers

297,414 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#GloryholeLondon#Gay#CockSucker#Blowjob#CumSwallow#BigDick#CumShot#wellhung#balls#sperm#uncut#hugecock
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Andrew Tate's dad fought off 4 men alone at 3am, then recited a famous quote to the sheriff while bleeding from a broken cheekbone and 30 stitches “We were in Detroit, Michigan, which wasn't the nicest place either. And we stopped in a gas station about 3:00 in the morning.” “I heard the Mexicans shouting at my dad saying, 'Say this. Say what? Say what? Say what?' And when I came around the corner, I saw these four Mexicans had jumped my dad and they were punching him in the face and my dad was swinging back.” “It was all pouring down his face where they were hitting him on the top of the head. They picked up things from the counter and they'd hit him and he was bleeding. He was leaning against the counter.” “He looked at me and I looked at him and I was so scared and he just looked me in the eye and then he looked back towards the door and was just staring at the door.” “The police officer said to him, 'What's your name, sir?' He said, 'Emry Tate.' He said, 'What's your job?' He said, 'I'm a chess player.' And he said, 'You just fought these four Mexicans by yourself. Maybe you should have been something else instead of a chess player.'” “And my dad said, 'My unmatched perspicacity coupled with sheer indefatigability makes me a feared opponent in any realm of human endeavor.'” “The sheriff just looked at him like, 'What the fuck did you just say?' Completely confused.” “My dad with a concussion, he ended up having a broken cheekbone, needed 30 stitches all over his head. The fact that my dad with a concussion after being jumped when asked a question, that's how he answered it is probably the easiest way I can describe the true genius of my father.” “I've watched every podcast on the planet. I've seen all these tech billionaires. I've seen all these geniuses. I've seen everything on the internet. I've never seen anybody speak the way my dad spoke ever.”
3:56

Andrew Tate's dad fought off 4 men alone at 3am, then recited a famous quote to the sheriff while bleeding from a broken cheekbone and 30 stitches “We were in Detroit, Michigan, which wasn't the nicest place either. And we stopped in a gas station about 3:00 in the morning.” “I heard the Mexicans shouting at my dad saying, 'Say this. Say what? Say what? Say what?' And when I came around the corner, I saw these four Mexicans had jumped my dad and they were punching him in the face and my dad was swinging back.” “It was all pouring down his face where they were hitting him on the top of the head. They picked up things from the counter and they'd hit him and he was bleeding. He was leaning against the counter.” “He looked at me and I looked at him and I was so scared and he just looked me in the eye and then he looked back towards the door and was just staring at the door.” “The police officer said to him, 'What's your name, sir?' He said, 'Emry Tate.' He said, 'What's your job?' He said, 'I'm a chess player.' And he said, 'You just fought these four Mexicans by yourself. Maybe you should have been something else instead of a chess player.'” “And my dad said, 'My unmatched perspicacity coupled with sheer indefatigability makes me a feared opponent in any realm of human endeavor.'” “The sheriff just looked at him like, 'What the fuck did you just say?' Completely confused.” “My dad with a concussion, he ended up having a broken cheekbone, needed 30 stitches all over his head. The fact that my dad with a concussion after being jumped when asked a question, that's how he answered it is probably the easiest way I can describe the true genius of my father.” “I've watched every podcast on the planet. I've seen all these tech billionaires. I've seen all these geniuses. I've seen everything on the internet. I've never seen anybody speak the way my dad spoke ever.”

ramagazzi

134,896 views • 1 month ago

Pure evil. Fuck Charleston White! Charleston White BRAGS about KILLING white man and wearing the murder like a “Badge of Honor.” That worthless piece of shit Charleston White is out here straight-up BRAGGING about murdering an innocent newlywed store employee named Michael Levy! He says he wears it like a badge of honor and white people can’t take it from him. “I served time for killing a white man, nigga… I’m the only black man I know who ever served time for killing a white man, nigga… I stood over him and watched him die. That’s a badge of honor to me, and white people can’t take that from me.” This thug and his gang of lowlife criminals stole shit from the store like the scavengers they are, and when Levy, a hardworking man who had just gotten married days earlier, chased their sorry asses down to stop the theft, they killed him in cold blood. White didn’t even pull the trigger himself but screamed for his buddy to shoot Levy. And now this clown is parading around, wearing that man’s death like a goddamn badge of honor, claiming that white people can’t take it away from him. What a disgusting, soulless animal. Celebrating the murder of a good man who was protecting his store and his community, all while playing the victim card and acting tough decades later. No remorse, just pure ghetto-trash arrogance. Michael Levy’s blood is on his hands forever, and this clown thinks it’s a trophy. This explains why he’s defending Karmelo Anthony. They’re cut from the same cloth, when evil people see one of their own, they stick together.
1:37

Sensitive content

Pure evil. Fuck Charleston White! Charleston White BRAGS about KILLING white man and wearing the murder like a “Badge of Honor.” That worthless piece of shit Charleston White is out here straight-up BRAGGING about murdering an innocent newlywed store employee named Michael Levy! He says he wears it like a badge of honor and white people can’t take it from him. “I served time for killing a white man, nigga… I’m the only black man I know who ever served time for killing a white man, nigga… I stood over him and watched him die. That’s a badge of honor to me, and white people can’t take that from me.” This thug and his gang of lowlife criminals stole shit from the store like the scavengers they are, and when Levy, a hardworking man who had just gotten married days earlier, chased their sorry asses down to stop the theft, they killed him in cold blood. White didn’t even pull the trigger himself but screamed for his buddy to shoot Levy. And now this clown is parading around, wearing that man’s death like a goddamn badge of honor, claiming that white people can’t take it away from him. What a disgusting, soulless animal. Celebrating the murder of a good man who was protecting his store and his community, all while playing the victim card and acting tough decades later. No remorse, just pure ghetto-trash arrogance. Michael Levy’s blood is on his hands forever, and this clown thinks it’s a trophy. This explains why he’s defending Karmelo Anthony. They’re cut from the same cloth, when evil people see one of their own, they stick together.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

1,495,123 views • 2 months ago

Bill Gurley: Anthropic Thinks It’s Building God @jason: It is the ultimate level of narcissism and delusion of grandeur to think you can create God. Bill Gurley: “Anthropic is a mystery to me. I've never, ever seen a company that is both leading their field and the most negatively outspoken commenter on what they do. And my initial theory was the regulatory capture theory. Quite frankly, I think they're very close to achieving that. But then they just got so loud that I've literally, in the past 30 days, read everything I can about Anthropic, and I've come up with a new theory. I call it the Dr. Frankenstein theory. The more I dig, I've met people who, I dare say, think it's their responsibility, and they're excited about, building a species that's superior to humans. Dario wrote this blog post called ‘Machines of Loving Grace.’ It was based on a poem. The last stanza of the poem says, ‘I like to think of a cybernetic ecology where we are free of our labors, and joined back to nature, returned to our mammal brothers and sisters, and all watched over by machines of loving grace.’ Sounds like an overlord to me. And then in Dario's post, he says, ‘It could be a capitalist economy of AI systems which then give out resources to humans based on some secondary economy of what the AI systems think makes sense to reward in humans…’ So I don't think they think they're writing software. I think they're midwifing a deity here.” Jason: “These are delusions of grandeur. Let's call it what it is. They believe that they're so powerful, these individuals, that they can create God, and that by creating God, they are like this Prometheus kind of species. It literally is the ultimate level of narcissism and delusion of grandeur to think you can create God.”
1:50

Bill Gurley: Anthropic Thinks It’s Building God @jason: It is the ultimate level of narcissism and delusion of grandeur to think you can create God. Bill Gurley: “Anthropic is a mystery to me. I've never, ever seen a company that is both leading their field and the most negatively outspoken commenter on what they do. And my initial theory was the regulatory capture theory. Quite frankly, I think they're very close to achieving that. But then they just got so loud that I've literally, in the past 30 days, read everything I can about Anthropic, and I've come up with a new theory. I call it the Dr. Frankenstein theory. The more I dig, I've met people who, I dare say, think it's their responsibility, and they're excited about, building a species that's superior to humans. Dario wrote this blog post called ‘Machines of Loving Grace.’ It was based on a poem. The last stanza of the poem says, ‘I like to think of a cybernetic ecology where we are free of our labors, and joined back to nature, returned to our mammal brothers and sisters, and all watched over by machines of loving grace.’ Sounds like an overlord to me. And then in Dario's post, he says, ‘It could be a capitalist economy of AI systems which then give out resources to humans based on some secondary economy of what the AI systems think makes sense to reward in humans…’ So I don't think they think they're writing software. I think they're midwifing a deity here.” Jason: “These are delusions of grandeur. Let's call it what it is. They believe that they're so powerful, these individuals, that they can create God, and that by creating God, they are like this Prometheus kind of species. It literally is the ultimate level of narcissism and delusion of grandeur to think you can create God.”

The All-In Podcast

916,527 views • 2 months ago

Sam Parr made a video about us hanging out and what he learned from it: “The people who are the best in the world at what they do, they're not two or three times better than the second or third place, they're a 100 or a 1,000 times better. And I've seen this a bunch of times. The most recent example was the other day with my friend David Senra. He has this podcast called Founders. It's one of the biggest, best podcasts I've ever listened to. It's very popular. Tycoons listen to it and he's become friends with all these amazing people because of it. I was at his studio and he had four (five!) very high-end fancy cameras and the most beautiful, fancy set that I've ever seen. And most podcasters they record with just two DSLR cameras. And I was like, David did these four (five!) fancy cameras actually matter compared to the two normal cameras that everyone like me uses. And without skipping a beat he said: “I'm trying to be the best in the world. Everything matters.” And then he just carried on with the conversation. He wasn't performing. That wasn't a performative answer. And the second thing that I learned the other day with David, when you're around these people who have this energy where they just feel like they're going to take over the world: That's contagious. I know that’s contagious because I still feel that way after hanging out with David. It's Sunday now. I was with him on Friday. And so this is a reminder to go and hang out with the best people you can. It wears off on you.”
1:36

Sam Parr made a video about us hanging out and what he learned from it: “The people who are the best in the world at what they do, they're not two or three times better than the second or third place, they're a 100 or a 1,000 times better. And I've seen this a bunch of times. The most recent example was the other day with my friend David Senra. He has this podcast called Founders. It's one of the biggest, best podcasts I've ever listened to. It's very popular. Tycoons listen to it and he's become friends with all these amazing people because of it. I was at his studio and he had four (five!) very high-end fancy cameras and the most beautiful, fancy set that I've ever seen. And most podcasters they record with just two DSLR cameras. And I was like, David did these four (five!) fancy cameras actually matter compared to the two normal cameras that everyone like me uses. And without skipping a beat he said: “I'm trying to be the best in the world. Everything matters.” And then he just carried on with the conversation. He wasn't performing. That wasn't a performative answer. And the second thing that I learned the other day with David, when you're around these people who have this energy where they just feel like they're going to take over the world: That's contagious. I know that’s contagious because I still feel that way after hanging out with David. It's Sunday now. I was with him on Friday. And so this is a reminder to go and hang out with the best people you can. It wears off on you.”

David Senra

34,631 views • 8 months ago

Javier Mascherano on why Lionel Messi broke down in tears after the final whistle against Spain in the FIFA World Cup final. 🗣️ Javier Mascherano: “After the match, I went straight to Leo. I hugged him and didn’t say anything for a few seconds because I knew there were no words that could take away that pain. When he finally spoke to me, he said something that broke my heart.” “He told me, ‘Jefe, these tears aren’t because we lost the World Cup. Of course losing hurts, but that’s not what’s breaking me. I’m crying because this might be the last time I ever wear the Argentina shirt. That’s the pain I can’t accept.’” “When he said those words, I couldn’t hold back my own tears. People think footballers only cry because they lose trophies. They don’t understand. Sometimes you’re crying because you know a chapter of your life the most beautiful chapter is coming to an end.” “I’ve known Leo for almost my entire career. I’ve seen him lift trophies, lose finals, face criticism and silence the world. But I’ve never seen him look the way he looked that night. It wasn’t the face of a man defeated by Spain. It was the face of a man saying goodbye to the jersey he loves more than anything.” “He kept looking at the Argentina badge on his chest. He touched it, kissed it and whispered, ‘I gave you everything I had.’ There wasn’t a single person in that dressing room who could look at him without crying.” “If that truly was his last match for Argentina, then the world didn’t witness the end of a football career it witnessed the final page of the greatest international story this sport has ever known. No trophy can measure what Lionel Messi gave to his country. He didn’t leave with just tears in his eyes; he left having given every last piece of his heart to Argentina.
0:33

Javier Mascherano on why Lionel Messi broke down in tears after the final whistle against Spain in the FIFA World Cup final. 🗣️ Javier Mascherano: “After the match, I went straight to Leo. I hugged him and didn’t say anything for a few seconds because I knew there were no words that could take away that pain. When he finally spoke to me, he said something that broke my heart.” “He told me, ‘Jefe, these tears aren’t because we lost the World Cup. Of course losing hurts, but that’s not what’s breaking me. I’m crying because this might be the last time I ever wear the Argentina shirt. That’s the pain I can’t accept.’” “When he said those words, I couldn’t hold back my own tears. People think footballers only cry because they lose trophies. They don’t understand. Sometimes you’re crying because you know a chapter of your life the most beautiful chapter is coming to an end.” “I’ve known Leo for almost my entire career. I’ve seen him lift trophies, lose finals, face criticism and silence the world. But I’ve never seen him look the way he looked that night. It wasn’t the face of a man defeated by Spain. It was the face of a man saying goodbye to the jersey he loves more than anything.” “He kept looking at the Argentina badge on his chest. He touched it, kissed it and whispered, ‘I gave you everything I had.’ There wasn’t a single person in that dressing room who could look at him without crying.” “If that truly was his last match for Argentina, then the world didn’t witness the end of a football career it witnessed the final page of the greatest international story this sport has ever known. No trophy can measure what Lionel Messi gave to his country. He didn’t leave with just tears in his eyes; he left having given every last piece of his heart to Argentina.

‏ْ

964,882 views • 1 month ago

8 years back, I spoke to jack schwager, the man behind the Market Wizards series. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 spoke to him again recently on In The Money, and it was an interesting conversation. Market Wizards is probably the only book I've read multiple times when I was trading actively. The one thing that stood out to me from the video was the debate between systematic vs. discretionary trading. There's a common assumption that the best traders are rules-based, meaning they follow a fixed set of rules. The logic is that this helps them keep their emotions in check so they can follow the signals dispassionately. But what Jack found among the traders he interviewed was that almost all of them were discretionary traders. They had rules, but they knew when not to follow them. Meaning, they knew when their approach wasn't working and when they had to change the "rules" they were following. The one purely systematic trader he ever profiled kept changing his systems. He once showed Jack the equity curve of the original system he made his first money on. It went straight up while he traded it, and straight down after he abandoned it. If he had stuck to it with blind discipline, he would have been wiped out. At the very least, what this shows is that there isn't just one way to make money. There are numerous approaches that work, and you ultimately have to figure out what works for you and stick with that approach until it stops working, because nothing works all the time. People change, the markets change, and so do the strategies. Full episode link in comments.
2:38

8 years back, I spoke to jack schwager, the man behind the Market Wizards series. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 spoke to him again recently on In The Money, and it was an interesting conversation. Market Wizards is probably the only book I've read multiple times when I was trading actively. The one thing that stood out to me from the video was the debate between systematic vs. discretionary trading. There's a common assumption that the best traders are rules-based, meaning they follow a fixed set of rules. The logic is that this helps them keep their emotions in check so they can follow the signals dispassionately. But what Jack found among the traders he interviewed was that almost all of them were discretionary traders. They had rules, but they knew when not to follow them. Meaning, they knew when their approach wasn't working and when they had to change the "rules" they were following. The one purely systematic trader he ever profiled kept changing his systems. He once showed Jack the equity curve of the original system he made his first money on. It went straight up while he traded it, and straight down after he abandoned it. If he had stuck to it with blind discipline, he would have been wiped out. At the very least, what this shows is that there isn't just one way to make money. There are numerous approaches that work, and you ultimately have to figure out what works for you and stick with that approach until it stops working, because nothing works all the time. People change, the markets change, and so do the strategies. Full episode link in comments.

Nithin Kamath

70,965 views • 22 days ago

When you hear the advice "hire the best," this is what that looks like: "We had a candidate who came and interviewed. He was a junior at MIT and very very young. We gave him our interview and he did way better than almost any of the full-time candidates that we had ever talked to. So we said to him, what do you think about taking some time off of school and working with us and building out Devin? And he thought about it for a while, and he came back, and he said I'm down, I want to do it, but my parents really want me to graduate from school, and I'm just not sure there's a way to make it work. So we talked with him more to fully understand the situation, and then we flew to North Carolina, went straight from the airport to his parents' house, had dinner with him and his parents, and tried to understand, all right, what would it take to make this work? They said it sounds like a great opportunity, but we really want our son to be able to graduate. So we figured out a setup where he could work for us essentially full time, but then come in for his required classes, and do what he needed to do to get the diploma. More than that, we got to a point where everyone was happy Then we went straight back to the airport and flew home." – Scott Wu, CEO and co-founder of @cognition, makers of Devin
0:59

When you hear the advice "hire the best," this is what that looks like: "We had a candidate who came and interviewed. He was a junior at MIT and very very young. We gave him our interview and he did way better than almost any of the full-time candidates that we had ever talked to. So we said to him, what do you think about taking some time off of school and working with us and building out Devin? And he thought about it for a while, and he came back, and he said I'm down, I want to do it, but my parents really want me to graduate from school, and I'm just not sure there's a way to make it work. So we talked with him more to fully understand the situation, and then we flew to North Carolina, went straight from the airport to his parents' house, had dinner with him and his parents, and tried to understand, all right, what would it take to make this work? They said it sounds like a great opportunity, but we really want our son to be able to graduate. So we figured out a setup where he could work for us essentially full time, but then come in for his required classes, and do what he needed to do to get the diploma. More than that, we got to a point where everyone was happy Then we went straight back to the airport and flew home." – Scott Wu, CEO and co-founder of @cognition, makers of Devin

Lenny Rachitsky

209,026 views • 1 year ago

The ZOOMED IN FOOTAGE shows it clearly. Cody Harper is halfway to his feet, still stumbling up from a beating, when an officer rushes him and pins him against the shutters. She never says she's police. He's in pure fight-or-flight, still thinking it's another attacker. So he swings to get free. That's it. That's the whole crime they're taking him to court for. He's at Birmingham Magistrates Court on JULY 23. That's a first hearing, not the trial. He enters his plea, and if he pleads not guilty, he can take it to a JURY. Twelve ordinary people, watching that same footage. Prison is unlikely for a first-timer. But that was never really the point. A conviction still leaves him with a criminal record, and depending on how it goes, that can trail him for years, turning up on the background checks employers run before they hand you a job. For a lad who was jumped in the street, that's the real cost here. Not a cell. A mark against his name he did nothing to earn. Now the bit that should stop you cold. Watch the SECOND officer. She walks straight up to the men who beat him, has a word, and lets them stroll off FREE. Then comes back and helps arrest the lad they attacked. Those attackers? Weeks on. Never even arrested. 1:30am, Broad Street. Cody, 20, is set on by a group. One floors him. Another swings at the back of his head. The police are right there. They don't chase the men doing it. They grab the VICTIM. Then the officer snarls at him, you're going to walk to the car, you f***ing dick. Try that in the street yourself and see how fast you're nicked. Then came their statement. No concerns over the officer. And please, stop sharing the footage. So X's own readers pinned a note under it. The footage disproves the police's account. Share it far and wide, to get justice for the man arrested. Fourteen million have seen it now. The police asked you to look away, and the public fact-checked them on their own post. This force is in special measures. Graded INADEQUATE on investigating crime and protecting the public. HALF the investigations inspectors checked had failed. They may have failed to log 46,000 uses of force. Their Chief Constable walked out in disgrace in January. Their crime-prediction tech gets it wrong 8 times out of 10. It’s not just Birmingham. Forces everywhere got flooded with green recruits in a hiring rush while the experienced ones walked. Training and vetting couldn't keep up. So now young officers with barely any life experience are making split-second calls they aren't ready for. Then there's the guidance. After Henry Nowak, the police are reviewing their own anti-racism policies, because officers are so busy second-guessing the optics of race, they miss the job right in front of them. Protect the victim. Arrest the attacker. Remember Nowak? Handcuffed as he lay dying, because his killer cried racism first and they believed the liar. Same instinct. Grab whoever looks like less trouble. Miss the actual crime. That's not one bad officer. That's a broken force, green recruits, and a rulebook with its priorities upside down. They found time to charge him. They still can't find the men who beat him. Nobody's had a trial. Cody's owed his day in court like anyone. Say that plainly. But watch that second officer let his attackers walk, read the note the public stapled to the police's own words, and ask yourself one thing. Who are the police actually protecting here. Because it isn't him.
4:24

The ZOOMED IN FOOTAGE shows it clearly. Cody Harper is halfway to his feet, still stumbling up from a beating, when an officer rushes him and pins him against the shutters. She never says she's police. He's in pure fight-or-flight, still thinking it's another attacker. So he swings to get free. That's it. That's the whole crime they're taking him to court for. He's at Birmingham Magistrates Court on JULY 23. That's a first hearing, not the trial. He enters his plea, and if he pleads not guilty, he can take it to a JURY. Twelve ordinary people, watching that same footage. Prison is unlikely for a first-timer. But that was never really the point. A conviction still leaves him with a criminal record, and depending on how it goes, that can trail him for years, turning up on the background checks employers run before they hand you a job. For a lad who was jumped in the street, that's the real cost here. Not a cell. A mark against his name he did nothing to earn. Now the bit that should stop you cold. Watch the SECOND officer. She walks straight up to the men who beat him, has a word, and lets them stroll off FREE. Then comes back and helps arrest the lad they attacked. Those attackers? Weeks on. Never even arrested. 1:30am, Broad Street. Cody, 20, is set on by a group. One floors him. Another swings at the back of his head. The police are right there. They don't chase the men doing it. They grab the VICTIM. Then the officer snarls at him, you're going to walk to the car, you f***ing dick. Try that in the street yourself and see how fast you're nicked. Then came their statement. No concerns over the officer. And please, stop sharing the footage. So X's own readers pinned a note under it. The footage disproves the police's account. Share it far and wide, to get justice for the man arrested. Fourteen million have seen it now. The police asked you to look away, and the public fact-checked them on their own post. This force is in special measures. Graded INADEQUATE on investigating crime and protecting the public. HALF the investigations inspectors checked had failed. They may have failed to log 46,000 uses of force. Their Chief Constable walked out in disgrace in January. Their crime-prediction tech gets it wrong 8 times out of 10. It’s not just Birmingham. Forces everywhere got flooded with green recruits in a hiring rush while the experienced ones walked. Training and vetting couldn't keep up. So now young officers with barely any life experience are making split-second calls they aren't ready for. Then there's the guidance. After Henry Nowak, the police are reviewing their own anti-racism policies, because officers are so busy second-guessing the optics of race, they miss the job right in front of them. Protect the victim. Arrest the attacker. Remember Nowak? Handcuffed as he lay dying, because his killer cried racism first and they believed the liar. Same instinct. Grab whoever looks like less trouble. Miss the actual crime. That's not one bad officer. That's a broken force, green recruits, and a rulebook with its priorities upside down. They found time to charge him. They still can't find the men who beat him. Nobody's had a trial. Cody's owed his day in court like anyone. Say that plainly. But watch that second officer let his attackers walk, read the note the public stapled to the police's own words, and ask yourself one thing. Who are the police actually protecting here. Because it isn't him.

BanksyCat

116,917 views • 1 month ago

It was three in the morning. Mega Star Mammootty, after finishing the shoot of his new film directed by Nidheesh Sakadev under the Mammootty Kampany banner, was rushing back to Kerala from Karaikudi. With him were his manager George, producer Anto Joseph, and friend, actor and MLA Ramesh Pisharody. When they reached Tiruppur, the highway was closed. They continued the journey using Google Maps. But Google Maps repeatedly showed wrong routes and kept them wandering for more than an hour. Annoyed, Mammootty said, “Let’s go back to the hotel in Karaikudi. We can leave tomorrow morning when the road opens…” Hearing this, the others looked at one another. Because all the next day’s programmes would have to be cancelled. As soon as Mammootty spoke, the driver turned the car around. They thought of asking someone for help on the way, but at that hour no one was to be seen. No vehicles or people were coming that way. They reached a place called Pattamangalam. At a petrol bunk there, a young man was sleeping covered with a mosquito net. They woke him up and asked for another route to Kerala. But all the routes he mentioned were the same closed ones they had already travelled and returned from. While he was explaining the alternative routes, a man who had been sleeping a little distance away came near them. Standing outside, he asked the people who were enquiring about the way, “Are you going to Kerala…?” and then looked intently inside the car. Surprise appeared on his face… his sleepiness completely vanished. “Are you Mammootty sir…? Come, follow me,” he said, and rode ahead of the car on a bike. Routes that even Google did not know… for 15 kilometres he rode in front, then stopped the bike at one place and said, “Look there… if you go straight on that road, it leads to Kerala…” and prepared to take leave. “What a good man… If he tells anyone tomorrow that he saw Mammootty and showed him the way, will they believe him?” said Ramesh Pisharody. Hearing this, Mammootty suddenly got down from the car and asked, “What is your name…?” “Pandiyan…” “Give me your phone…” Mammootty took the phone from him and handed it to Ramesh Pisharody. Mammootty hugged Pandiyan… “Pandiyan is my friend from now on,” he said, and asked Ramesh Pisharody to take a photo on Pandiyan’s own phone. Mammootty thanked him and took leave…
0:23

It was three in the morning. Mega Star Mammootty, after finishing the shoot of his new film directed by Nidheesh Sakadev under the Mammootty Kampany banner, was rushing back to Kerala from Karaikudi. With him were his manager George, producer Anto Joseph, and friend, actor and MLA Ramesh Pisharody. When they reached Tiruppur, the highway was closed. They continued the journey using Google Maps. But Google Maps repeatedly showed wrong routes and kept them wandering for more than an hour. Annoyed, Mammootty said, “Let’s go back to the hotel in Karaikudi. We can leave tomorrow morning when the road opens…” Hearing this, the others looked at one another. Because all the next day’s programmes would have to be cancelled. As soon as Mammootty spoke, the driver turned the car around. They thought of asking someone for help on the way, but at that hour no one was to be seen. No vehicles or people were coming that way. They reached a place called Pattamangalam. At a petrol bunk there, a young man was sleeping covered with a mosquito net. They woke him up and asked for another route to Kerala. But all the routes he mentioned were the same closed ones they had already travelled and returned from. While he was explaining the alternative routes, a man who had been sleeping a little distance away came near them. Standing outside, he asked the people who were enquiring about the way, “Are you going to Kerala…?” and then looked intently inside the car. Surprise appeared on his face… his sleepiness completely vanished. “Are you Mammootty sir…? Come, follow me,” he said, and rode ahead of the car on a bike. Routes that even Google did not know… for 15 kilometres he rode in front, then stopped the bike at one place and said, “Look there… if you go straight on that road, it leads to Kerala…” and prepared to take leave. “What a good man… If he tells anyone tomorrow that he saw Mammootty and showed him the way, will they believe him?” said Ramesh Pisharody. Hearing this, Mammootty suddenly got down from the car and asked, “What is your name…?” “Pandiyan…” “Give me your phone…” Mammootty took the phone from him and handed it to Ramesh Pisharody. Mammootty hugged Pandiyan… “Pandiyan is my friend from now on,” he said, and asked Ramesh Pisharody to take a photo on Pandiyan’s own phone. Mammootty thanked him and took leave…

Rajasekar

105,811 views • 6 days ago

Fans tracked down a hotpot restaurant from the drama set and chatted with the owner. He shared a stream of unfiltered stories that are pure gold ✨ 💦 The Water Fight. “I was watching their water fight and blurted out: “Hey, your water stinks!” It was pitch black, I’m telling you! 😂 The pool was old and hadn’t been cleaned. Leizi was right there and saw they hadn’t even started yet, but the water truck driver was already yelling: “Hold on! Let me finish with this water first - I’ve got other places to be!” I rode over on my scooter from that bridge and just sat there watching 🛴👀. The second I lifted my phone to record, they shooed me away 🙈. Someone from the crew shouted: “You’re such a pest!” And I shot back: “Takes one to know one!” They all knew me by then 😅.” 🍭 Yueyue and the sugar figures. “That day, Yueyue was standing there filming how they make those blown-sugar figures. I was behind the container chatting with him (the owner). They had this huge lighting panel and I accidentally kicked the plug out with my foot 😳! The cameraman goes: “What happened?” And Yueyue immediately points at me: “He messed up! He pulled it out! Punish him!”😂 I’m like: “It wasn’t me!” And he says: “I’m calling the director right now to scold you.” So I just turned and left 😅. That’s just his personality - what you see is what you get, and it’s honestly kind of endearing 💖.” 🚬 Cigarettes: “Those two were always together at the convenience store - one drinking his water, the other smoking his cigarettes. The store owner even knew they smoked “Kuanzhai” (28 yuan a pack). Later, he said they were out. And one of them (probably Leizi) goes: “I’ll give you 50 for it.” Can you imagine? Fifty for a pack - talk about premium cigarettes🔥. So funny.” 💬 The Conversations. “I asked him (Yueyue): “How old are you?” He just said: “How old do I look?” - never gave me a straight answer 🙃. I said: “Why are you wearing a hat in this heat?” He took it off and went: “Look - bald. Not a single hair.” 😆 Later, he hits me with: “Why do you think your restaurant isn’t taking off?” I said: “Dunno.” And he goes: “I think you’re even more annoying than I am.” Hahaha! The director who was resting nearby told me: “You’ve got a really outgoing personality. If you were ten years younger, you could’ve been in movies .” I joked back: “Ah, come on, I’m just an old piece of overcured bacon now 🥓😂.” “When they were packing up to leave, I said to them: “You guys aren’t really acting, are you? (You seem for real.)” They didn’t say anything - just stayed silent. But Yueyue over there talked a mile a minute 🗣️💨. Then he asks me: “Can you get rich running a hotpot place?” I said: “Nope.” So I asked him: “Can you get rich acting?” And he fires back: “Look at me - I’m so poor I don’t even have eyebrows left.” Hahaha 😂😂!”
2:19

Fans tracked down a hotpot restaurant from the drama set and chatted with the owner. He shared a stream of unfiltered stories that are pure gold ✨ 💦 The Water Fight. “I was watching their water fight and blurted out: “Hey, your water stinks!” It was pitch black, I’m telling you! 😂 The pool was old and hadn’t been cleaned. Leizi was right there and saw they hadn’t even started yet, but the water truck driver was already yelling: “Hold on! Let me finish with this water first - I’ve got other places to be!” I rode over on my scooter from that bridge and just sat there watching 🛴👀. The second I lifted my phone to record, they shooed me away 🙈. Someone from the crew shouted: “You’re such a pest!” And I shot back: “Takes one to know one!” They all knew me by then 😅.” 🍭 Yueyue and the sugar figures. “That day, Yueyue was standing there filming how they make those blown-sugar figures. I was behind the container chatting with him (the owner). They had this huge lighting panel and I accidentally kicked the plug out with my foot 😳! The cameraman goes: “What happened?” And Yueyue immediately points at me: “He messed up! He pulled it out! Punish him!”😂 I’m like: “It wasn’t me!” And he says: “I’m calling the director right now to scold you.” So I just turned and left 😅. That’s just his personality - what you see is what you get, and it’s honestly kind of endearing 💖.” 🚬 Cigarettes: “Those two were always together at the convenience store - one drinking his water, the other smoking his cigarettes. The store owner even knew they smoked “Kuanzhai” (28 yuan a pack). Later, he said they were out. And one of them (probably Leizi) goes: “I’ll give you 50 for it.” Can you imagine? Fifty for a pack - talk about premium cigarettes🔥. So funny.” 💬 The Conversations. “I asked him (Yueyue): “How old are you?” He just said: “How old do I look?” - never gave me a straight answer 🙃. I said: “Why are you wearing a hat in this heat?” He took it off and went: “Look - bald. Not a single hair.” 😆 Later, he hits me with: “Why do you think your restaurant isn’t taking off?” I said: “Dunno.” And he goes: “I think you’re even more annoying than I am.” Hahaha! The director who was resting nearby told me: “You’ve got a really outgoing personality. If you were ten years younger, you could’ve been in movies .” I joked back: “Ah, come on, I’m just an old piece of overcured bacon now 🥓😂.” “When they were packing up to leave, I said to them: “You guys aren’t really acting, are you? (You seem for real.)” They didn’t say anything - just stayed silent. But Yueyue over there talked a mile a minute 🗣️💨. Then he asks me: “Can you get rich running a hotpot place?” I said: “Nope.” So I asked him: “Can you get rich acting?” And he fires back: “Look at me - I’m so poor I don’t even have eyebrows left.” Hahaha 😂😂!”

Littlecorn🌽

19,274 views • 8 months ago

Charlie Chaplin wrote one of the most quietly devastating things ever committed to paper about love and marriage. He had read Schopenhauer. He knew the philosopher's famous argument: That happiness is a negative state, merely the absence of suffering. Chaplin disagreed. And the reason he disagreed was his wife, Una. He wrote about her in his own words: "For the last 30 years, I have known what happiness means. I have the good fortune to be married to a wonderful wife." He admitted he could not fully put it into words: "Perfect love is the most beautiful of all frustrations because it is more than one can express." Then he did something remarkable for a man of his ego and stature. He described her not on a stage. Not at a premiere. Not in a moment of triumph. He described her walking ahead of him on a narrow sidewalk. "Even as she walks ahead of me along the narrow sidewalks of Viv with her simple dignity, a neat little figure straight, her dark hair smoothed back, showing a few silver threads. A sudden wave of love and admiration comes over me for all that she is. And a lump comes into my throat." That was Charlie Chaplin. The man who made the whole world laugh, reduced to a lump in the throat on an ordinary sidewalk, watching his wife walk ahead of him. He also wrote that living with Una was "a continual revelation." Not a familiar comfort. Not a settled routine. A revelation. As if after three decades, she was still showing him things he had not seen before. Schopenhauer had his theory. Chaplin had Una. And he considered that the better argument.
2:03

Charlie Chaplin wrote one of the most quietly devastating things ever committed to paper about love and marriage. He had read Schopenhauer. He knew the philosopher's famous argument: That happiness is a negative state, merely the absence of suffering. Chaplin disagreed. And the reason he disagreed was his wife, Una. He wrote about her in his own words: "For the last 30 years, I have known what happiness means. I have the good fortune to be married to a wonderful wife." He admitted he could not fully put it into words: "Perfect love is the most beautiful of all frustrations because it is more than one can express." Then he did something remarkable for a man of his ego and stature. He described her not on a stage. Not at a premiere. Not in a moment of triumph. He described her walking ahead of him on a narrow sidewalk. "Even as she walks ahead of me along the narrow sidewalks of Viv with her simple dignity, a neat little figure straight, her dark hair smoothed back, showing a few silver threads. A sudden wave of love and admiration comes over me for all that she is. And a lump comes into my throat." That was Charlie Chaplin. The man who made the whole world laugh, reduced to a lump in the throat on an ordinary sidewalk, watching his wife walk ahead of him. He also wrote that living with Una was "a continual revelation." Not a familiar comfort. Not a settled routine. A revelation. As if after three decades, she was still showing him things he had not seen before. Schopenhauer had his theory. Chaplin had Una. And he considered that the better argument.

History Nerd

23,679 views • 2 months ago

One aspect of film history that interests me is the decision-making of actors. They can have a lot of talent, but lack judgment and have bad advisors, and inhibit their careers. Take Burt Reynolds. He was talented and handsome, and he did a lot of good work. But he never won an Oscar, and that bothered him, and he will not be remembered as an all-time great. Why? Well, he turned down offers to be McMurphy in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, which became one of Jack Nicholson’s best roles. He pulled himself out of the running to be James Bond. He didn’t want the role of Hans Solo in Star Wars, which did a lot for Harrison Ford. Now consider this role he took as a porn director/producer in Boogie Nights. He was fantastic - totally believable and hilarious. But he was upset about the movie after it came out, and embarrassed about being seen as a sleazy pornographer. Yet it’s one of the best things he ever did. He didn’t like some of his best work. It’s just an interesting conundrum - that a man can have skills as an actor but lack judgment and intelligence. This is probably very common among a group of people who get paid to perform lines someone else wrote. Pretending to be other people is on a lower level than writing and conceiving a story.
0:56

One aspect of film history that interests me is the decision-making of actors. They can have a lot of talent, but lack judgment and have bad advisors, and inhibit their careers. Take Burt Reynolds. He was talented and handsome, and he did a lot of good work. But he never won an Oscar, and that bothered him, and he will not be remembered as an all-time great. Why? Well, he turned down offers to be McMurphy in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, which became one of Jack Nicholson’s best roles. He pulled himself out of the running to be James Bond. He didn’t want the role of Hans Solo in Star Wars, which did a lot for Harrison Ford. Now consider this role he took as a porn director/producer in Boogie Nights. He was fantastic - totally believable and hilarious. But he was upset about the movie after it came out, and embarrassed about being seen as a sleazy pornographer. Yet it’s one of the best things he ever did. He didn’t like some of his best work. It’s just an interesting conundrum - that a man can have skills as an actor but lack judgment and intelligence. This is probably very common among a group of people who get paid to perform lines someone else wrote. Pretending to be other people is on a lower level than writing and conceiving a story.

FischerKing

589,944 views • 8 months ago

This hypocritical, biased dumbass literally said it’s not Rashford’s fault and that all the blame should be on the #MUFC management for trying to reintegrate him into the team. And the most annoying part? His followers will still sit there defending this nonsense. How can someone be this determined to hate the club that literally feeds his platform? How is none of this Rashford’s fault? He didn’t want to play for Manchester United. He wanted to leave. He literally said he wanted a “new challenge.” His performances before he left were pathetic. £325k a week and he couldn’t even be bothered to run half the time. One genuinely great season for us, and outside of that, he has been incredibly inconsistent. He thought he was a superstar who would simply walk into any top club in Europe. The #mufc management reportedly wanted just £28m for him, in a summer where Anthony Gordon is being valued at almost £80m, and somehow you’re STILL blaming the management? Is it the management that told Barcelona not to see value in Rashford? Is it the management that stopped other top clubs from deciding he wasn’t worth the money or wages? Rashford literally made it clear he didn’t want Turkey or Saudi Arabia. He wanted a top European club. Fine. But no top club came for him. So what exactly do you expect Manchester United to do? Tear up his contract? Give him away for free? Pay a huge portion of his wages while he plays for someone else? Keep bending over backwards for a player who has already made it clear he wants out? I don’t blame the board for refusing to bend over backwards for Barcelona. They spent £100m on wingers and were willing to spend around £150m on Álvarez. If they don’t see Rashford as worth the money, that’s their decision. But this whole “the board should have handled it better” argument is ridiculous. How much better could they realistically have handled it? They put a £28m price tag on him. That is not some outrageous valuation. They tried to sell him. No club came forward with the money. Rashford didn’t want to go to certain leagues. His wages are enormous. What exactly do you genuinely want the club to do? Loan him out, let another club use him, AND have Manchester United continue paying part of his £325k-a-week wages while we’re trying to rebuild the squad? And then Mark is talking about PR. What exactly do you expect Manchester United to announce? “Rashford is under contract, but we don’t want him here”? Of course they’re not going to publicly humiliate a player who is still their employee. At some point, you have to stop bending reality just to blame the club. Even thinking Rashford is one of the reason they are not giving big contracts anymore! Mark has genuinely become one of the dumbest football commentators I’ve ever seen. And the fact that people will still bend themselves into pretzels defending this take is what gets me. And not like I won’t back Rashford, he’s our player now, and we will give him the support until he’s not. That what a real fan do not crying everyday on livestream #transfer #blockmarkgoldbride #manunited
1:01

This hypocritical, biased dumbass literally said it’s not Rashford’s fault and that all the blame should be on the #MUFC management for trying to reintegrate him into the team. And the most annoying part? His followers will still sit there defending this nonsense. How can someone be this determined to hate the club that literally feeds his platform? How is none of this Rashford’s fault? He didn’t want to play for Manchester United. He wanted to leave. He literally said he wanted a “new challenge.” His performances before he left were pathetic. £325k a week and he couldn’t even be bothered to run half the time. One genuinely great season for us, and outside of that, he has been incredibly inconsistent. He thought he was a superstar who would simply walk into any top club in Europe. The #mufc management reportedly wanted just £28m for him, in a summer where Anthony Gordon is being valued at almost £80m, and somehow you’re STILL blaming the management? Is it the management that told Barcelona not to see value in Rashford? Is it the management that stopped other top clubs from deciding he wasn’t worth the money or wages? Rashford literally made it clear he didn’t want Turkey or Saudi Arabia. He wanted a top European club. Fine. But no top club came for him. So what exactly do you expect Manchester United to do? Tear up his contract? Give him away for free? Pay a huge portion of his wages while he plays for someone else? Keep bending over backwards for a player who has already made it clear he wants out? I don’t blame the board for refusing to bend over backwards for Barcelona. They spent £100m on wingers and were willing to spend around £150m on Álvarez. If they don’t see Rashford as worth the money, that’s their decision. But this whole “the board should have handled it better” argument is ridiculous. How much better could they realistically have handled it? They put a £28m price tag on him. That is not some outrageous valuation. They tried to sell him. No club came forward with the money. Rashford didn’t want to go to certain leagues. His wages are enormous. What exactly do you genuinely want the club to do? Loan him out, let another club use him, AND have Manchester United continue paying part of his £325k-a-week wages while we’re trying to rebuild the squad? And then Mark is talking about PR. What exactly do you expect Manchester United to announce? “Rashford is under contract, but we don’t want him here”? Of course they’re not going to publicly humiliate a player who is still their employee. At some point, you have to stop bending reality just to blame the club. Even thinking Rashford is one of the reason they are not giving big contracts anymore! Mark has genuinely become one of the dumbest football commentators I’ve ever seen. And the fact that people will still bend themselves into pretzels defending this take is what gets me. And not like I won’t back Rashford, he’s our player now, and we will give him the support until he’s not. That what a real fan do not crying everyday on livestream #transfer #blockmarkgoldbride #manunited

UTD_IYES

15,582 views • 12 days ago

🤯 The reasons this Labour MP gives for why migrants come here are absolutely INSANE! Listen to this absolute gem from Sam Rushworth on national TV: “There’s two big pull factors. One is that they speak the English language because we spent a couple of centuries going around the world colonising it and teaching everyone our language.” Jeremy Kyle is taken aback, realises Sam has just let the cat out of the bag, and fires straight back: “There’s the reason that the Labour Party will forever allow people to come to this country… you’ve just said what I’ve always suspected is central to many people’s view – that as you said, we went around the world colonising, and that’s why we should accept.” Sam then carries on with more utter nonsense about how they want to live in a country where they can “speak the language and already have a support network.” Kyle can’t believe what he’s hearing and jumps straight back in: “Half of them can’t speak English when they get here! Come on Sam… you’re not telling me a majority of migrants who come to this country can speak English are you!?” These are the people running the country. The ones supposedly tasked with stopping the immigration crisis. It’s terrifying how completely detached from reality they are. Claiming most of them speak English shows he lives in a total bubble. He has no idea what ordinary people actually face every day: hotels packed with young men who can’t speak a word of English, crumbling services, rising crime, and a system that actively rewards illegal entry. And the colonialism excuse? That’s the real giveaway. It means he thinks we should just take as many as decide to come because it’s all our fault. Sheer ideological nonsense. If that’s your starting point, you will never stop the boats. You’ll only manage the decline, while lecturing the rest of us about history.
1:02

🤯 The reasons this Labour MP gives for why migrants come here are absolutely INSANE! Listen to this absolute gem from Sam Rushworth on national TV: “There’s two big pull factors. One is that they speak the English language because we spent a couple of centuries going around the world colonising it and teaching everyone our language.” Jeremy Kyle is taken aback, realises Sam has just let the cat out of the bag, and fires straight back: “There’s the reason that the Labour Party will forever allow people to come to this country… you’ve just said what I’ve always suspected is central to many people’s view – that as you said, we went around the world colonising, and that’s why we should accept.” Sam then carries on with more utter nonsense about how they want to live in a country where they can “speak the language and already have a support network.” Kyle can’t believe what he’s hearing and jumps straight back in: “Half of them can’t speak English when they get here! Come on Sam… you’re not telling me a majority of migrants who come to this country can speak English are you!?” These are the people running the country. The ones supposedly tasked with stopping the immigration crisis. It’s terrifying how completely detached from reality they are. Claiming most of them speak English shows he lives in a total bubble. He has no idea what ordinary people actually face every day: hotels packed with young men who can’t speak a word of English, crumbling services, rising crime, and a system that actively rewards illegal entry. And the colonialism excuse? That’s the real giveaway. It means he thinks we should just take as many as decide to come because it’s all our fault. Sheer ideological nonsense. If that’s your starting point, you will never stop the boats. You’ll only manage the decline, while lecturing the rest of us about history.

J Stewart

69,407 views • 2 days ago

Farage and the suckers I used to regularly socialise with a group, one of whose number was a financial lawyer. He used to tell us about something that was surprisingly common in his line of work. He would be called in to give advice because someone wanted to spend their life savings on a scheme that was an obvious scam. He said that 99% of the time they could not be talked out of it. Nothing and nobody could persuade them not to do it, because they were convinced that a fortune was there to be made, and they were desperate to pour as much money as they could into the scheme. They would get really angry with anyone (like a spouse, or other family, or friends) who tried to stop them. Why are you stopping me from making a fortune, they would say. “You're ruining my chance of living the life of my dreams,” was their view. This was meant to happen. This was the life they deserved, which had been so cruelly denied to them for so long. Finally reality was going to turn around and favour them for a change. It was the “Shut up and take my money” meme in real life. It wasn’t that they didn't understand about scams. Yes, scams happen, they knew that, but they don’t happen to me. (That, at least, was my friend’s summation of their thinking based on talking to them.) They could barely take seriously the idea that they were a gullible fool who was being tricked. When obvious problems and flaws with the scheme were pointed out, they would come up with far-fetched and implausible explanations to wave the problems away. Any explanation would do, as long as it meant they didn’t have to wake up from the dream. In almost every case the person concerned decided to put their money into the scheme. Hardly anyone decided not to. In every single case they lost all the money. In every one of these cases the mark was completely shocked and stunned when it happened. They never saw it coming, despite so many people around them telling them it was a con. I bring this up because the situation with Nigel Farage is similar. People are desperate to believe that he is going to save the country. I don't blame them for being desperate. The situation *is* desperate. But that means that many people will cling onto anything which is presented to them as the solution. Farage, they are told by the media, is the big, bad anti-immigration, anti-green, anti-PC man. Great, they think. If the media doesn't like him, then he’s the man for me. I'm also against those things. So they buy into him, big time, without a proper examination. Look, they say, he was Mr Anti-EU for decades. He’s Mr Brexit. He released that poster during the Brexit campaign depicting a long line of foreigners trying to get into Britain. The hated MSM attacks him for being anti-immigration, etc. So how can you lose if you trust him? Life will become good again if we all just support Nigel. Sink your emotional life-savings into him, and watch the results pour in once he gets power. So when you tell them to read Farage’s fine-print, like the Reform manifesto (digging into what slogans like “Net Zero immigration” actually mean), or particular things he has publicly said over the years, and what many people who have worked with him say about him, they act exactly like those people who are advised not to invest their life savings into a get-rich-quick scheme. They get angry and offended. Why are you trying to take away my dream of a better life for me, and a better Britain for all of us? Why are you undermining the only man who stands any chance of transforming the country for us, and preventing my life from getting worse and worse? You’re just trying to ruin everything. You’re just a negative Nelly, who is too afraid to take a risk. Maybe you even support Labour, really. And so on. When asked to explain why it is that Farage’s actual positions, and his track record, indicate that he is not remotely the hard-liner they think he is, they act like the wannabe investors who will come up with any excuse, no matter how implausible, to preserve the dream. I know, I've seen many of them in my comments doing this. “He has to pretend to be more mainstream and mild than he really is in order that he doesn’t get bad MSM headlines” is the gist of it. “The BBC would tear him apart and his support would vanish overnight if he said anything stronger at this stage,” they say. In other words, “he has to get his party into a stronger position before he can say anything that might seem radical.” Apparently being neck-and-neck with Labour and the Conservatives in the polls, having MPs in Parliament, facing rival parties that are collapsing in unprecedented fashion for their adherence to the established ways, having the media hang on your every word, and facing a country crying out for a change in your supposed direction, isn’t a strong enough position for you to lay out your real agenda. You’ve still got to be timid and pretend to differ only slightly from the Conservative Party, lest the British people say, “Reducing mass immigration back to the levels they were in 2000 frightens me, who will cook our kebabs? I’m going to go back to the Tories/Labour/LibDems.” So it’s quite reasonable, apparently, for Farage to delay saying what he really thinks until 2034. Or 2039. Until then, we’ll just twiddle our thumbs and trust him with our support. It never occurs to them as a serious possibility that maybe Farage isn’t “hiding his real power levels,” but just isn’t very radical. In fact, his whole history indicates that not only does he have no interest in supporting robust anti-immigrationism, he is actively opposed to it. He left UKIP because he thought UKIP people were too concerned with Islamic immigration. When he was in charge of UKIP it worked with the intelligence services to weed out anyone who didn’t want Britain being filled up with foreigners. All his public statements going back thirty years indicate that he is a liberal, supply-side Thatcherite, who repudiates nationalism, unless it’s anodyne, flag-waving, Union-Jack-biscuit-tin civic nationalism, where anyone who can vaguely adopt some British cliches (cricket, tea, old Jags, etc.) gets a passport. If he’s playing a game to fool the media, it’s a game that goes back a long, long way. Where is the actual evidence, then, that shows that he is in any way a nativist? What reason is there to believe that he is really is a blood-and-soil nationalist who will suddenly reveal, once in power, his determination to remigrate millions of foreigners, when he’s spent his whole life urging against this? There is no reason to believe this at all, other than people’s desperation to search for a Messiah figure, and the fact that the media (and various hysterical left-wingers) give people the impression that this is Farage’s plan. But they have no evidence for this either, and anyway, why would the media give airtime to someone who genuinely thought this? Wouldn't that devious and tricksy ol’ MSM be more likely to give airtime to someone who was actually rather liberal when it comes down to it, but who can be made to seem like an attractive, anti-establishment rebel, while simultaneously sidelining the real rebels? It's like when the people who want to give away their life savings are shown the long history of bankruptcies that their Svengali has left behind, and they excuse it by saying something like, “Oh, that’s because he never had enough financial support from people. But thanks to me, I can finally give him the money he needs to succeed.” Or whatever excuse they kid themselves with. When asked, “But what evidence is there that he can make you money?”, they reply, “He’s told me his plan, and swears it will work, and it sounds good to me. Look, the rate of return is amazing, I can't pass that chance up, don’t look a gift horse in the mouth,” and so on. Farage also has a glib, charismatic manner, and is very good at talking in general-enough language that people can read into it what they like. “People on the streets have been talking to me, and they've had enough,” he kept saying during the summer 2024 election campaign, but he was rather vague about what exactly they were fed up with, and even vaguer about what he proposed to do about it, which allowed the sucker, er, supporter to decide that Farage was talking about just the very things the supporter thinks are important, and had in mind the same solutions. The media will admit, though, when it thinks the average Joe isn’t listening, that Farage isn’t anywhere near as bad as they normally make him out to be. This is what’s going on in this video clip of Michael Crick, which was from Times Radio, which the average Joe doesn’t listen to. The point of Crick admitting this is to calm down any naive liberals or leftists who are starting to froth at the mouth at the prospect of Farage getting anywhere. (“Look, we don't like him, but we can live with him, he's tamer than you think, better him than some genuine nationalist party.”) I haven't even talked about the idiocy of thinking that Reform’s support would plummet overnight instead of rising (or at least staying roughly the same) if they started talking tougher. (The Telegraph’s pet hamster Tim Stanley hysterically claimed recently that if Reform decided to do this they would lose 10,000 votes for every “far-Right” voter they courted.) I haven’t said anything about how an anti-establishment party must of necessity drive changes in stateable public opinion, rather than accept the status quo. Nor have I talked about the foolishness of trusting a party that you think is cowardly and constantly lying. Or the problem of how rational it is to believe that a timid party, that said for years that it definitely won't do X, Y and Z, will be capable of doing X, Y and Z when it gets power, especially seeing as it will face the real wrath of the establishment at that point. These are all legitimate topics for discussion, but in this article I have been mainly concerned with the parallels with the self-deluding life-savings investor. The conman doesn’t need that many suckers to be a success. He just needs a few. Similarly, Farage doesn’t need that many people to fall for his shtick. With the other big parties’ support in free fall, he can set Reform up as the rebel outsider party for years on the back of a minority of votes, without ever having to make any hard choices, or commit to any positions which will genuinely set the establishment against him. He also has an advantage over the traditional conman, who operates on the margins and in the shadows, of having the media there to endorse him as the “official” rebel. Their every warning makes him seem more attractive to the dissatisfied: “Don’t vote for that Farage, don’t you know he’s anti-immigration and anti-Net Zero? He’s a maverick who doesn’t do what he’s told.” No wonder Reform’s membership numbers are going through the roof. When one person loses their head to a charismatic phony it’s a private tragedy. When enough voters lose their heads to a political phony, who’s taking away the oxygen that a real opposition needs, it’s a public tragedy. So I say, keep your political life savings in a box under your bed for now. And if you must spend some or all of it on Farage, be demanding. Keep all your receipts, note what he says and doesn’t say, and demand that he clearly articulates the feelings of the people he claims to represent. Don’t let him fob you off with vague and airy platitudes. He’s not Barack Obama. He’s your rebel, so make him speak for you, and if he won’t, find someone else who will.
1:41

Farage and the suckers I used to regularly socialise with a group, one of whose number was a financial lawyer. He used to tell us about something that was surprisingly common in his line of work. He would be called in to give advice because someone wanted to spend their life savings on a scheme that was an obvious scam. He said that 99% of the time they could not be talked out of it. Nothing and nobody could persuade them not to do it, because they were convinced that a fortune was there to be made, and they were desperate to pour as much money as they could into the scheme. They would get really angry with anyone (like a spouse, or other family, or friends) who tried to stop them. Why are you stopping me from making a fortune, they would say. “You're ruining my chance of living the life of my dreams,” was their view. This was meant to happen. This was the life they deserved, which had been so cruelly denied to them for so long. Finally reality was going to turn around and favour them for a change. It was the “Shut up and take my money” meme in real life. It wasn’t that they didn't understand about scams. Yes, scams happen, they knew that, but they don’t happen to me. (That, at least, was my friend’s summation of their thinking based on talking to them.) They could barely take seriously the idea that they were a gullible fool who was being tricked. When obvious problems and flaws with the scheme were pointed out, they would come up with far-fetched and implausible explanations to wave the problems away. Any explanation would do, as long as it meant they didn’t have to wake up from the dream. In almost every case the person concerned decided to put their money into the scheme. Hardly anyone decided not to. In every single case they lost all the money. In every one of these cases the mark was completely shocked and stunned when it happened. They never saw it coming, despite so many people around them telling them it was a con. I bring this up because the situation with Nigel Farage is similar. People are desperate to believe that he is going to save the country. I don't blame them for being desperate. The situation *is* desperate. But that means that many people will cling onto anything which is presented to them as the solution. Farage, they are told by the media, is the big, bad anti-immigration, anti-green, anti-PC man. Great, they think. If the media doesn't like him, then he’s the man for me. I'm also against those things. So they buy into him, big time, without a proper examination. Look, they say, he was Mr Anti-EU for decades. He’s Mr Brexit. He released that poster during the Brexit campaign depicting a long line of foreigners trying to get into Britain. The hated MSM attacks him for being anti-immigration, etc. So how can you lose if you trust him? Life will become good again if we all just support Nigel. Sink your emotional life-savings into him, and watch the results pour in once he gets power. So when you tell them to read Farage’s fine-print, like the Reform manifesto (digging into what slogans like “Net Zero immigration” actually mean), or particular things he has publicly said over the years, and what many people who have worked with him say about him, they act exactly like those people who are advised not to invest their life savings into a get-rich-quick scheme. They get angry and offended. Why are you trying to take away my dream of a better life for me, and a better Britain for all of us? Why are you undermining the only man who stands any chance of transforming the country for us, and preventing my life from getting worse and worse? You’re just trying to ruin everything. You’re just a negative Nelly, who is too afraid to take a risk. Maybe you even support Labour, really. And so on. When asked to explain why it is that Farage’s actual positions, and his track record, indicate that he is not remotely the hard-liner they think he is, they act like the wannabe investors who will come up with any excuse, no matter how implausible, to preserve the dream. I know, I've seen many of them in my comments doing this. “He has to pretend to be more mainstream and mild than he really is in order that he doesn’t get bad MSM headlines” is the gist of it. “The BBC would tear him apart and his support would vanish overnight if he said anything stronger at this stage,” they say. In other words, “he has to get his party into a stronger position before he can say anything that might seem radical.” Apparently being neck-and-neck with Labour and the Conservatives in the polls, having MPs in Parliament, facing rival parties that are collapsing in unprecedented fashion for their adherence to the established ways, having the media hang on your every word, and facing a country crying out for a change in your supposed direction, isn’t a strong enough position for you to lay out your real agenda. You’ve still got to be timid and pretend to differ only slightly from the Conservative Party, lest the British people say, “Reducing mass immigration back to the levels they were in 2000 frightens me, who will cook our kebabs? I’m going to go back to the Tories/Labour/LibDems.” So it’s quite reasonable, apparently, for Farage to delay saying what he really thinks until 2034. Or 2039. Until then, we’ll just twiddle our thumbs and trust him with our support. It never occurs to them as a serious possibility that maybe Farage isn’t “hiding his real power levels,” but just isn’t very radical. In fact, his whole history indicates that not only does he have no interest in supporting robust anti-immigrationism, he is actively opposed to it. He left UKIP because he thought UKIP people were too concerned with Islamic immigration. When he was in charge of UKIP it worked with the intelligence services to weed out anyone who didn’t want Britain being filled up with foreigners. All his public statements going back thirty years indicate that he is a liberal, supply-side Thatcherite, who repudiates nationalism, unless it’s anodyne, flag-waving, Union-Jack-biscuit-tin civic nationalism, where anyone who can vaguely adopt some British cliches (cricket, tea, old Jags, etc.) gets a passport. If he’s playing a game to fool the media, it’s a game that goes back a long, long way. Where is the actual evidence, then, that shows that he is in any way a nativist? What reason is there to believe that he is really is a blood-and-soil nationalist who will suddenly reveal, once in power, his determination to remigrate millions of foreigners, when he’s spent his whole life urging against this? There is no reason to believe this at all, other than people’s desperation to search for a Messiah figure, and the fact that the media (and various hysterical left-wingers) give people the impression that this is Farage’s plan. But they have no evidence for this either, and anyway, why would the media give airtime to someone who genuinely thought this? Wouldn't that devious and tricksy ol’ MSM be more likely to give airtime to someone who was actually rather liberal when it comes down to it, but who can be made to seem like an attractive, anti-establishment rebel, while simultaneously sidelining the real rebels? It's like when the people who want to give away their life savings are shown the long history of bankruptcies that their Svengali has left behind, and they excuse it by saying something like, “Oh, that’s because he never had enough financial support from people. But thanks to me, I can finally give him the money he needs to succeed.” Or whatever excuse they kid themselves with. When asked, “But what evidence is there that he can make you money?”, they reply, “He’s told me his plan, and swears it will work, and it sounds good to me. Look, the rate of return is amazing, I can't pass that chance up, don’t look a gift horse in the mouth,” and so on. Farage also has a glib, charismatic manner, and is very good at talking in general-enough language that people can read into it what they like. “People on the streets have been talking to me, and they've had enough,” he kept saying during the summer 2024 election campaign, but he was rather vague about what exactly they were fed up with, and even vaguer about what he proposed to do about it, which allowed the sucker, er, supporter to decide that Farage was talking about just the very things the supporter thinks are important, and had in mind the same solutions. The media will admit, though, when it thinks the average Joe isn’t listening, that Farage isn’t anywhere near as bad as they normally make him out to be. This is what’s going on in this video clip of Michael Crick, which was from Times Radio, which the average Joe doesn’t listen to. The point of Crick admitting this is to calm down any naive liberals or leftists who are starting to froth at the mouth at the prospect of Farage getting anywhere. (“Look, we don't like him, but we can live with him, he's tamer than you think, better him than some genuine nationalist party.”) I haven't even talked about the idiocy of thinking that Reform’s support would plummet overnight instead of rising (or at least staying roughly the same) if they started talking tougher. (The Telegraph’s pet hamster Tim Stanley hysterically claimed recently that if Reform decided to do this they would lose 10,000 votes for every “far-Right” voter they courted.) I haven’t said anything about how an anti-establishment party must of necessity drive changes in stateable public opinion, rather than accept the status quo. Nor have I talked about the foolishness of trusting a party that you think is cowardly and constantly lying. Or the problem of how rational it is to believe that a timid party, that said for years that it definitely won't do X, Y and Z, will be capable of doing X, Y and Z when it gets power, especially seeing as it will face the real wrath of the establishment at that point. These are all legitimate topics for discussion, but in this article I have been mainly concerned with the parallels with the self-deluding life-savings investor. The conman doesn’t need that many suckers to be a success. He just needs a few. Similarly, Farage doesn’t need that many people to fall for his shtick. With the other big parties’ support in free fall, he can set Reform up as the rebel outsider party for years on the back of a minority of votes, without ever having to make any hard choices, or commit to any positions which will genuinely set the establishment against him. He also has an advantage over the traditional conman, who operates on the margins and in the shadows, of having the media there to endorse him as the “official” rebel. Their every warning makes him seem more attractive to the dissatisfied: “Don’t vote for that Farage, don’t you know he’s anti-immigration and anti-Net Zero? He’s a maverick who doesn’t do what he’s told.” No wonder Reform’s membership numbers are going through the roof. When one person loses their head to a charismatic phony it’s a private tragedy. When enough voters lose their heads to a political phony, who’s taking away the oxygen that a real opposition needs, it’s a public tragedy. So I say, keep your political life savings in a box under your bed for now. And if you must spend some or all of it on Farage, be demanding. Keep all your receipts, note what he says and doesn’t say, and demand that he clearly articulates the feelings of the people he claims to represent. Don’t let him fob you off with vague and airy platitudes. He’s not Barack Obama. He’s your rebel, so make him speak for you, and if he won’t, find someone else who will.

Hector Drummond

34,408 views • 1 year ago

Gary Melton Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton is a former Green Beret who constantly hides behind the title of "Green Beret" whenever he is challenged. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: X is full of propagandists and coordinated accounts. One reason they operate on X instead of platforms like Instagram is that comments are harder to control and delete, a flood of trolls can quickly overwhelm a discussion and that is the Goal. There is a well-known psychological principle called the mere-exposure effect, which describes how people can develop a preference for an idea simply because they encounter it repeatedly. Combined with the illusory truth effect, constant repetition can make false claims feel true. The goal is often to attack and discredit people who challenge a narrative while flooding comment sections with repeated talking points until others begin accepting them as fact. Gary Melton has repeatedly made false claims about me. He claimed that I do not have a law degree, which I showed him on live show next day! I Then he said that I only started my career after Charlie died and even suggested that I am a Russian agent. I showed video from 7 years ago me working as a journalist on the ground, proof every single time he lied. Every one of these claims was challenged with evidence, yet he continued repeating them and never apologized for it. As I looked further into the people around him, I found Jennifer Griffin, who presents herself as a producer. From what I could find, her background appears to emphasize military involvement and volunteer work she claims she did, I found a few interesting details she was not happy about, she supports and has obvious ties with Ukrainian military it is all in her pictures posts on linkedIn. That caught my attention because I already viewed Gary as someone spreading misinformation, whether intentionally or unintentionally. I warned Gary that if he continued making false statements about me, I would continue researching him and his crew. Shortly afterward, Jennifer changed the visibility of her LinkedIn profile took down her pictures and blocked me. That told me that she is guilty as hell of something. Innocent people do not delete stuff. She also blocked me on X, allowing her to continue making accusations while preventing me from responding directly to her audience. Gary appears unusually focused on attacking both me and Candace Owens and everyone who ever challenges his lies, he blocked all my followers and veterans who challenged him. He is mentally unstable. A significant portion of his online activity seems devoted to criticizing us rather than engaging with the facts being presented. The situation became more serious when Gary edited one of my videos and distributed it while misrepresenting what I said. He claimed that I was receiving illegal information from the FBI as a foreign agent. He called me a Russian operative, which is a very serious allegation. That demoted moron can't tell the difference between Russia and the country of Georgia. Every single ting he said is completely false. What I actually said was that friends who worked for the FBI, which they have, which are now former FBI and NYPD personnel conduct their own investigations and have access to resources and databases that I do not personally have access to. Gary lied to the FBI and said I'm a Russian agent who has a secret source apparently in the FBI and is illegally getting information. It's one thing to troll someone and lie about someone's degree and it is whole another thing to go so far to Lie to the FBI. Gary crossed a line. Disagreements, criticism, and even false accusations about my background are one thing. Falsely accusing someone of criminal conduct specifically and lying to the FBI about it is another matter entirely. I challenged Gary that if he thinks I'm a russian agent to directly reach out to the head of FBI FBI Director Kash Patel and report it. Instead Gary chose to lie to the FBI. Because of these claims, I reached out to the FBI myself. If someone is making allegations that I am engaged in criminal activity or acting as a foreign agent, those allegations should be supported by evidence and when they are not then a man making them should be looked at and investigated and punished! As far as I know lying to the FBI is a crime and rightfully so! Here is how mentally deranged he is, just look at his wall. And this man calls himself a Green Beret. He is a shame to the American military and the honorable men and women who serve do not deserve someone like Gary tarnishing their reputation by hiding behind military credentials. And Gary you are a pussy and you will always be a pussy. A man who runs from a debate can not be anything else.
0:40

Gary Melton Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton is a former Green Beret who constantly hides behind the title of "Green Beret" whenever he is challenged. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: X is full of propagandists and coordinated accounts. One reason they operate on X instead of platforms like Instagram is that comments are harder to control and delete, a flood of trolls can quickly overwhelm a discussion and that is the Goal. There is a well-known psychological principle called the mere-exposure effect, which describes how people can develop a preference for an idea simply because they encounter it repeatedly. Combined with the illusory truth effect, constant repetition can make false claims feel true. The goal is often to attack and discredit people who challenge a narrative while flooding comment sections with repeated talking points until others begin accepting them as fact. Gary Melton has repeatedly made false claims about me. He claimed that I do not have a law degree, which I showed him on live show next day! I Then he said that I only started my career after Charlie died and even suggested that I am a Russian agent. I showed video from 7 years ago me working as a journalist on the ground, proof every single time he lied. Every one of these claims was challenged with evidence, yet he continued repeating them and never apologized for it. As I looked further into the people around him, I found Jennifer Griffin, who presents herself as a producer. From what I could find, her background appears to emphasize military involvement and volunteer work she claims she did, I found a few interesting details she was not happy about, she supports and has obvious ties with Ukrainian military it is all in her pictures posts on linkedIn. That caught my attention because I already viewed Gary as someone spreading misinformation, whether intentionally or unintentionally. I warned Gary that if he continued making false statements about me, I would continue researching him and his crew. Shortly afterward, Jennifer changed the visibility of her LinkedIn profile took down her pictures and blocked me. That told me that she is guilty as hell of something. Innocent people do not delete stuff. She also blocked me on X, allowing her to continue making accusations while preventing me from responding directly to her audience. Gary appears unusually focused on attacking both me and Candace Owens and everyone who ever challenges his lies, he blocked all my followers and veterans who challenged him. He is mentally unstable. A significant portion of his online activity seems devoted to criticizing us rather than engaging with the facts being presented. The situation became more serious when Gary edited one of my videos and distributed it while misrepresenting what I said. He claimed that I was receiving illegal information from the FBI as a foreign agent. He called me a Russian operative, which is a very serious allegation. That demoted moron can't tell the difference between Russia and the country of Georgia. Every single ting he said is completely false. What I actually said was that friends who worked for the FBI, which they have, which are now former FBI and NYPD personnel conduct their own investigations and have access to resources and databases that I do not personally have access to. Gary lied to the FBI and said I'm a Russian agent who has a secret source apparently in the FBI and is illegally getting information. It's one thing to troll someone and lie about someone's degree and it is whole another thing to go so far to Lie to the FBI. Gary crossed a line. Disagreements, criticism, and even false accusations about my background are one thing. Falsely accusing someone of criminal conduct specifically and lying to the FBI about it is another matter entirely. I challenged Gary that if he thinks I'm a russian agent to directly reach out to the head of FBI FBI Director Kash Patel and report it. Instead Gary chose to lie to the FBI. Because of these claims, I reached out to the FBI myself. If someone is making allegations that I am engaged in criminal activity or acting as a foreign agent, those allegations should be supported by evidence and when they are not then a man making them should be looked at and investigated and punished! As far as I know lying to the FBI is a crime and rightfully so! Here is how mentally deranged he is, just look at his wall. And this man calls himself a Green Beret. He is a shame to the American military and the honorable men and women who serve do not deserve someone like Gary tarnishing their reputation by hiding behind military credentials. And Gary you are a pussy and you will always be a pussy. A man who runs from a debate can not be anything else.

ELIZABETH LANE

23,530 views • 2 months ago

🚨⚠️📢FOUND: SHOCKING VIDEO INTERVIEW ABOUT WILLIAM RUTO‼️Why is nobody talking about this⁉️Why are people not bringing this up⁉️This is such a damning "origin story"‼️For sure, William Ruto must not be on the 2027 ballot‼️Transcript below: Gachoka: Now, moving away from that. I also then want to say, as he retired, he left Rift Valley, without a leader to take his position. Over the years, there has been several attempts to take over the mantle. The late Nicolas Biwott. For example, your friend Senator Gideon Moi and now the DP, William Ruto. Let's now maybe agree that Ruto is the kingpin in the Rift Valley. How would you contrast the two? Jirongo: Yes. William Ruto could be the kingpin in Rift Valley today, but I think, it is a misplaced choice in my, blunt view. That, if I had to look at Gideon Moi, and look at William Ruto, they are far apart. Maybe William has learned to socialize, but he doesn't socialize genuinely. And, it is taking Gideon time to actually socialize. But the two are miles apart, one is a human being and another one is something else. Gachoka: Let's then, first of all, look at this man, William Ruto. Cyrus, people who are younger may not know of YK92 or your role when President Moi was fighting for political life, is that you are mobilizing the youth of Kenya and so forth, and you then got together with Ruto. Could you give us a synopsis of YK92 and how you met Ruto? Jirongo: YK92 was a lobby group, just eh young men coming together who were able and, they went flat out to try and mobilize the country for retired President Moi. Gachoka: What period was this Cyrus? Jirongo: This was 91. And, ending up in 92 and up to 93. The earlier parts of 93 after elections. And the purpose was that at one time there was serious agitation of multipartyism in the Republic. And, the agitation had gone on for quite some time. Repeal of section 2A so that multipartyism could be accepted in the Republic of Kenya. And it was not easy, particularly for the people. There were so many things going on, it was difficult from the Moi [era]. And we, we came in to try to, to, to to work with him. Gachoka: And let me then say, at that time, of 91 and so on. You were the chairman of YK92, what role was William Ruto in YK92? Because I'm trying to find out how your relationship began. Jirongo: William Ruto was never part of, Youth for KANU 92. William, William Ruto was one of the young men who spent their time at KICC, at the youth and the women's office with Doctor Julia Ojiambo. I actually came to know William Ruto, properly, after elections in 1993. We worked closely with Julia Ojiambo. And that is how, I ended up knowing Ruto. And specifically when he came in to try and get some orders to supply t-shirts and all those sorts of things. Gachoka: I see. So, in terms of the joining KANU as a party and becoming an operative, you were very close to President Moi. Obviously Ruto began his political life then, how did he enter into the Moi orbit? And, what do you remember... Jirongo: The truth be said, William Ruto. Then after the 1992, campaign where we lobbied, for votes for Moi, he then looked for friendship with me through Fred Amayo, and they pushed very hard. I was a bit hesitant, but, because of something that had happened and, I talked to Amayo, I told Fred Amayo, this young man, you brought him into my office and asked me to give him a contract to supply 10,000 T-shirts. You remember, he did not supply the 10,000. Instead, he brought a thousand T-shirts and repeatedly, delivered the same, t-shirts ten times. So we ended up paying, or I ended up paying him 1.2 million shillings because a t-shirt then was about, 120 shillings for the delivery of only a thousand shillings [t-shirts]. What he did was he tried and corrupted the young boys who were in the stores, and, he would deliver a thousand t-shirts. They give it back to him, he delivers again, and they give it back for him, ten times. And so I paid him, 1.2 million instead of, paying him for a thousand t-shirts, which would have been 120,000. And that is the reason why I resisted when Fred Amayo tried to push him, to become closer so that we work together after, disbanding YK92. Gachoka: Right. So the Kenyans can understand his journey after that. How did he then jump in to be an assistant minister in the Moi government? Jirongo: That is far much, much later we worked together then, Amayo succeeded Fred Amayo, and we worked together with William in the same office until 1997. And, some of the things I feared, when Amayo, was trying to push him closer, came to pass, including you agree with somebody, there is this work you need to do, He comes back and gives you the wrong quote. You give him money. The same money is discovered in his car in the evening. Those kind of things. Gachoka: You know Cyrus I bring this issue because, the deputy president, was quoted and, in, in a, in the function saying that the problem with you, you never, move from the past, ulikuwa mkubwa wake ama mdosi. Sasa wewe huwezi kukubali amekuwa mdosi. Jirongo: You see, Gachoka: I want Kenyans to understand that history. Jirongo: When you try to get to whatever position using whatever means, including fraud, deception, and which is a hallmark of a lot of politicians in this country. Unfortunately, I was not made like that. I do my things fairly, in a very straight way, I do not, take advantage of people. He does take advantage of people. He worked with President Moi, President Moi made him a deputy minister, and, he moved on. I introduced him to President Moi. After that, he got rid of Moi, Moi meant nothing. He became Raila’s friend. After that, Raila meant nothing. He stepped on Raila very roughly, tried to penetrate the Kibaki regime, finally ending up, through struggle because I know actually Uhuru resisted working with, with Ruto for quite a while through friends. Paul Ndungu tried to get him closer, Uhuru refused. It is, Wanjigi who finally managed to push Ruto through to Uhuru. But I think Uhuru also read that there is a bit of trouble here, because history could tell him that this is a man, if he has no respect for Jirongo. He has no respect for Moi. He has no respect, for Raila. And these are people who he has worked with in politics, and tried, these people have played a role in his political life. Who am I Uhuru Kenyatta, that this man is going to work with me and he respect me, and we will work together for the good of this country. Gachoka: So Jirongo, because this is Point Blank, Jirongo: Yes. Gachoka: Are you telling Kenyans, who are watching you today that Ruto and Uhuru are, it's not, it's not, it's not it's not working? Jirongo: They are not cut from the same leaf as I might say. They are totally two different people. You have somebody who is, deceptive and you have somebody who is genuine and straight. It's very difficult for the two of you to work together competently and efficiently. Gachoka: I have to ask you this because, from where you sit, there's confusing headlines every day. There's tanga tanga, kieleweke names that are all there out there in the media. But many times when the deputy president is speaking, he says nimetumwa na mdoss, he has sent me here with 5 million or a million, then tomorrow the headline they have fallen apart, they are not, you know Jirongo this country's in 2020, and I just would like you to tell Kenyans. Is it broken with Kenyatta and Ruto? Jirongo: I'm not seeing it working and I saw it not working from the word go. It can never work, because as I've told you, you are dealing with totally two different individuals. Gachoka: And then if that is the case, I wanted to say this, is it Kenyatta who betrayed Ruto? because at least where the news headlines are, is that Kenyatta na Ruto walikuwa pamoja na Kenyatta anadanganya Ruto, anampokonya, he is not keeping his word. Why do you think this has broken down? Jirongo: History can bear out, honorable Uhuru Kenyatta on this, one, William Ruto fell out with the retired president Moi, he fell out with Raila. He fell out with me. And, it is usual for him after he has used you and the thinks, you have no value anymore, the first time maybe, their first five years, Uhuru was useful. But for now, Uhuru is irrelevant as far as William is concerned, he wants to get to the next. And whoever he can use, that's why he's always in Central Province places. As a deputy president, if I'm going to my president’s turf, surely I need his blessings and tell him I'm going to your turf, What message do you give me? What I can tell you without, flinching an eye, most of those incursions Ruto has been making in, Central Province. There they stem from realizing, as far as he is concerned, that Uhuru is of no value to me anymore. Let me go. Let me see who I can groom, and, the people I’ll work with, to achieve my ends. And, of course, you expect Uhuru to be frustrated, other than the other issues that have, played out very loudly, including corruption. Gachoka: Well, Cyrus Jirongo says, retired President Daniel Arap Moi and the upcoming William Samoei arap Ruto are different people cut from different cloths. Jirongo contends that Ruto dumped him or used him, and he did the same to retired Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Is there more than meets the eye to William Ruto? You're watching KTN news. #RutoMustGo #RutoMustGoNow #GhostRuto #GhostRuto2026 #WANTAM
12:25

🚨⚠️📢FOUND: SHOCKING VIDEO INTERVIEW ABOUT WILLIAM RUTO‼️Why is nobody talking about this⁉️Why are people not bringing this up⁉️This is such a damning "origin story"‼️For sure, William Ruto must not be on the 2027 ballot‼️Transcript below: Gachoka: Now, moving away from that. I also then want to say, as he retired, he left Rift Valley, without a leader to take his position. Over the years, there has been several attempts to take over the mantle. The late Nicolas Biwott. For example, your friend Senator Gideon Moi and now the DP, William Ruto. Let's now maybe agree that Ruto is the kingpin in the Rift Valley. How would you contrast the two? Jirongo: Yes. William Ruto could be the kingpin in Rift Valley today, but I think, it is a misplaced choice in my, blunt view. That, if I had to look at Gideon Moi, and look at William Ruto, they are far apart. Maybe William has learned to socialize, but he doesn't socialize genuinely. And, it is taking Gideon time to actually socialize. But the two are miles apart, one is a human being and another one is something else. Gachoka: Let's then, first of all, look at this man, William Ruto. Cyrus, people who are younger may not know of YK92 or your role when President Moi was fighting for political life, is that you are mobilizing the youth of Kenya and so forth, and you then got together with Ruto. Could you give us a synopsis of YK92 and how you met Ruto? Jirongo: YK92 was a lobby group, just eh young men coming together who were able and, they went flat out to try and mobilize the country for retired President Moi. Gachoka: What period was this Cyrus? Jirongo: This was 91. And, ending up in 92 and up to 93. The earlier parts of 93 after elections. And the purpose was that at one time there was serious agitation of multipartyism in the Republic. And, the agitation had gone on for quite some time. Repeal of section 2A so that multipartyism could be accepted in the Republic of Kenya. And it was not easy, particularly for the people. There were so many things going on, it was difficult from the Moi [era]. And we, we came in to try to, to, to to work with him. Gachoka: And let me then say, at that time, of 91 and so on. You were the chairman of YK92, what role was William Ruto in YK92? Because I'm trying to find out how your relationship began. Jirongo: William Ruto was never part of, Youth for KANU 92. William, William Ruto was one of the young men who spent their time at KICC, at the youth and the women's office with Doctor Julia Ojiambo. I actually came to know William Ruto, properly, after elections in 1993. We worked closely with Julia Ojiambo. And that is how, I ended up knowing Ruto. And specifically when he came in to try and get some orders to supply t-shirts and all those sorts of things. Gachoka: I see. So, in terms of the joining KANU as a party and becoming an operative, you were very close to President Moi. Obviously Ruto began his political life then, how did he enter into the Moi orbit? And, what do you remember... Jirongo: The truth be said, William Ruto. Then after the 1992, campaign where we lobbied, for votes for Moi, he then looked for friendship with me through Fred Amayo, and they pushed very hard. I was a bit hesitant, but, because of something that had happened and, I talked to Amayo, I told Fred Amayo, this young man, you brought him into my office and asked me to give him a contract to supply 10,000 T-shirts. You remember, he did not supply the 10,000. Instead, he brought a thousand T-shirts and repeatedly, delivered the same, t-shirts ten times. So we ended up paying, or I ended up paying him 1.2 million shillings because a t-shirt then was about, 120 shillings for the delivery of only a thousand shillings [t-shirts]. What he did was he tried and corrupted the young boys who were in the stores, and, he would deliver a thousand t-shirts. They give it back to him, he delivers again, and they give it back for him, ten times. And so I paid him, 1.2 million instead of, paying him for a thousand t-shirts, which would have been 120,000. And that is the reason why I resisted when Fred Amayo tried to push him, to become closer so that we work together after, disbanding YK92. Gachoka: Right. So the Kenyans can understand his journey after that. How did he then jump in to be an assistant minister in the Moi government? Jirongo: That is far much, much later we worked together then, Amayo succeeded Fred Amayo, and we worked together with William in the same office until 1997. And, some of the things I feared, when Amayo, was trying to push him closer, came to pass, including you agree with somebody, there is this work you need to do, He comes back and gives you the wrong quote. You give him money. The same money is discovered in his car in the evening. Those kind of things. Gachoka: You know Cyrus I bring this issue because, the deputy president, was quoted and, in, in a, in the function saying that the problem with you, you never, move from the past, ulikuwa mkubwa wake ama mdosi. Sasa wewe huwezi kukubali amekuwa mdosi. Jirongo: You see, Gachoka: I want Kenyans to understand that history. Jirongo: When you try to get to whatever position using whatever means, including fraud, deception, and which is a hallmark of a lot of politicians in this country. Unfortunately, I was not made like that. I do my things fairly, in a very straight way, I do not, take advantage of people. He does take advantage of people. He worked with President Moi, President Moi made him a deputy minister, and, he moved on. I introduced him to President Moi. After that, he got rid of Moi, Moi meant nothing. He became Raila’s friend. After that, Raila meant nothing. He stepped on Raila very roughly, tried to penetrate the Kibaki regime, finally ending up, through struggle because I know actually Uhuru resisted working with, with Ruto for quite a while through friends. Paul Ndungu tried to get him closer, Uhuru refused. It is, Wanjigi who finally managed to push Ruto through to Uhuru. But I think Uhuru also read that there is a bit of trouble here, because history could tell him that this is a man, if he has no respect for Jirongo. He has no respect for Moi. He has no respect, for Raila. And these are people who he has worked with in politics, and tried, these people have played a role in his political life. Who am I Uhuru Kenyatta, that this man is going to work with me and he respect me, and we will work together for the good of this country. Gachoka: So Jirongo, because this is Point Blank, Jirongo: Yes. Gachoka: Are you telling Kenyans, who are watching you today that Ruto and Uhuru are, it's not, it's not, it's not it's not working? Jirongo: They are not cut from the same leaf as I might say. They are totally two different people. You have somebody who is, deceptive and you have somebody who is genuine and straight. It's very difficult for the two of you to work together competently and efficiently. Gachoka: I have to ask you this because, from where you sit, there's confusing headlines every day. There's tanga tanga, kieleweke names that are all there out there in the media. But many times when the deputy president is speaking, he says nimetumwa na mdoss, he has sent me here with 5 million or a million, then tomorrow the headline they have fallen apart, they are not, you know Jirongo this country's in 2020, and I just would like you to tell Kenyans. Is it broken with Kenyatta and Ruto? Jirongo: I'm not seeing it working and I saw it not working from the word go. It can never work, because as I've told you, you are dealing with totally two different individuals. Gachoka: And then if that is the case, I wanted to say this, is it Kenyatta who betrayed Ruto? because at least where the news headlines are, is that Kenyatta na Ruto walikuwa pamoja na Kenyatta anadanganya Ruto, anampokonya, he is not keeping his word. Why do you think this has broken down? Jirongo: History can bear out, honorable Uhuru Kenyatta on this, one, William Ruto fell out with the retired president Moi, he fell out with Raila. He fell out with me. And, it is usual for him after he has used you and the thinks, you have no value anymore, the first time maybe, their first five years, Uhuru was useful. But for now, Uhuru is irrelevant as far as William is concerned, he wants to get to the next. And whoever he can use, that's why he's always in Central Province places. As a deputy president, if I'm going to my president’s turf, surely I need his blessings and tell him I'm going to your turf, What message do you give me? What I can tell you without, flinching an eye, most of those incursions Ruto has been making in, Central Province. There they stem from realizing, as far as he is concerned, that Uhuru is of no value to me anymore. Let me go. Let me see who I can groom, and, the people I’ll work with, to achieve my ends. And, of course, you expect Uhuru to be frustrated, other than the other issues that have, played out very loudly, including corruption. Gachoka: Well, Cyrus Jirongo says, retired President Daniel Arap Moi and the upcoming William Samoei arap Ruto are different people cut from different cloths. Jirongo contends that Ruto dumped him or used him, and he did the same to retired Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Is there more than meets the eye to William Ruto? You're watching KTN news. #RutoMustGo #RutoMustGoNow #GhostRuto #GhostRuto2026 #WANTAM

Gen Z Initiative

19,013 views • 5 months ago

Scott Brooks: "You can argue the [Lakers] had the best player ever to play the game [Kobe] for 20 years..." Pat Riley: "He ranks right there with Jordan." David Stern: "Kobe is there with Michael." Dr J.: "[Kobe's] as good as anyone who's ever played. Let's put it that way." George Gervin: "He set himself apart from everyone else." Kevin Durant: "How do you not say [Kobe and Jordan] are by far better than anybody who's played the game?" Isaiah Thomas: “I mean, he’s the greatest of all time in life and in basketball." Adeyemi Adediran (B/R 2010): "KOBE BRYANT IS THE GREATEST PLAYER TO EVER TOUCH A BASKETBALL." Jerry Rice: "Greatest of all time. You have to earn that title, and I think Kobe did that." Randy Moss: "Kobe Bryant is the best basketball player that I've ever seen dribble a basketball." Mark Jackson: "I never thought I would say it playing against Michael Jordan for so long but Kobe Bryant at the end of the day...will go down as the greatest basketball player that has ever lived." Mark Schlererh: "One time, one game, I'm taking Kobe Bryant." Paul Pierce: "If a game is on the line and I need one game, I want Kob." Steve Smith: "He's the best, most fundamentaly [sound] player I've ever played against or watched." Kendrick Perkins: "Most skilled to EVER play the game, it's not even a debate." Chauncey Billups: "I think Kobe is more skilled than any player that's ever played." Phil Jackson when asked if Kobe has better basketball skills than Michael Jordan: "He does." Vince Carter: "I mean, I still have to give it (GOAT) to Michael Jordan, with a close Kobe Bryant 2nd." Paul Westphal: "Who is to say Kobe Bryant isn’t going to be better than Michael Jordan? Let’s get that out on the table right now. He’s a lot better than Jordan was at the same age." Shaq: "If you want to have that conversation (GOAT), there has to be another name added to that - Kobe." Rip Hamilton: "Whoever voted Kobe [at 10] flat out disrespected him...when Magic comes out and says Kobe is the best Laker of all-time, that means better than him and better than the guy Magic played with, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar." Rudy Tomjanovich: "I truly believe [Kobe] has the chance to become the greatest player to ever play the game." Greg Anthony: "Kobe Bryant is the most complete basketball player the game has ever seen." Shaq: "You know what, I had the greatest player ever. We could've won six or seven championships, but you live and you learn." Allen Iverson: "I don't understand how they don't have the debate when it comes to Kobe." Mike Breen: "It's starting to happen again Mark, the conversation, the debate on is [Kobe] as good as Michael Jordan. It's been blasphemy to say it, really about anybody, but it's an actual discussion you can have now. Mark Jackson: "Well I said it a year and a half ago, no way in the world would I ever put anybody in the conversation with Michael Jordan but Kobe Bryant is there. He's as good as Michael Jordan on any given day. I said to Bryant yesterday,, 'it's almost like Larry Holmes and Muhammad Ali.' He looked at me and said, 'I'm not Larry Holmes.' And he is 100% right. It is two Muhammad Ali's when you talk about Jordan and Bryant." Grant Taylor (B/R 2011): "Players that come to mind are Bill Russell, Wilt Chamberlain, Jerry West, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Michael Jordan. But I've now officially put Kobe Bryant on this list, and judging by the title of this article, it is clear I'm not just saying he belongs with these players. No. Kobe Bryant is the greatest and most legendary of all these players." Charles Barkley: "Kobe Bryant is the best player I’ve ever seen other than Michael Jordan." Matt Barnes: "To me, Jordan is 1 and Kobe is 1B." Phil Jackson on who he'd pick to start a team with between Kobe and Jordan: “I’d do a coin flip and whichever one came up heads or tails, I would take that person.”
0:58

Scott Brooks: "You can argue the [Lakers] had the best player ever to play the game [Kobe] for 20 years..." Pat Riley: "He ranks right there with Jordan." David Stern: "Kobe is there with Michael." Dr J.: "[Kobe's] as good as anyone who's ever played. Let's put it that way." George Gervin: "He set himself apart from everyone else." Kevin Durant: "How do you not say [Kobe and Jordan] are by far better than anybody who's played the game?" Isaiah Thomas: “I mean, he’s the greatest of all time in life and in basketball." Adeyemi Adediran (B/R 2010): "KOBE BRYANT IS THE GREATEST PLAYER TO EVER TOUCH A BASKETBALL." Jerry Rice: "Greatest of all time. You have to earn that title, and I think Kobe did that." Randy Moss: "Kobe Bryant is the best basketball player that I've ever seen dribble a basketball." Mark Jackson: "I never thought I would say it playing against Michael Jordan for so long but Kobe Bryant at the end of the day...will go down as the greatest basketball player that has ever lived." Mark Schlererh: "One time, one game, I'm taking Kobe Bryant." Paul Pierce: "If a game is on the line and I need one game, I want Kob." Steve Smith: "He's the best, most fundamentaly [sound] player I've ever played against or watched." Kendrick Perkins: "Most skilled to EVER play the game, it's not even a debate." Chauncey Billups: "I think Kobe is more skilled than any player that's ever played." Phil Jackson when asked if Kobe has better basketball skills than Michael Jordan: "He does." Vince Carter: "I mean, I still have to give it (GOAT) to Michael Jordan, with a close Kobe Bryant 2nd." Paul Westphal: "Who is to say Kobe Bryant isn’t going to be better than Michael Jordan? Let’s get that out on the table right now. He’s a lot better than Jordan was at the same age." Shaq: "If you want to have that conversation (GOAT), there has to be another name added to that - Kobe." Rip Hamilton: "Whoever voted Kobe [at 10] flat out disrespected him...when Magic comes out and says Kobe is the best Laker of all-time, that means better than him and better than the guy Magic played with, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar." Rudy Tomjanovich: "I truly believe [Kobe] has the chance to become the greatest player to ever play the game." Greg Anthony: "Kobe Bryant is the most complete basketball player the game has ever seen." Shaq: "You know what, I had the greatest player ever. We could've won six or seven championships, but you live and you learn." Allen Iverson: "I don't understand how they don't have the debate when it comes to Kobe." Mike Breen: "It's starting to happen again Mark, the conversation, the debate on is [Kobe] as good as Michael Jordan. It's been blasphemy to say it, really about anybody, but it's an actual discussion you can have now. Mark Jackson: "Well I said it a year and a half ago, no way in the world would I ever put anybody in the conversation with Michael Jordan but Kobe Bryant is there. He's as good as Michael Jordan on any given day. I said to Bryant yesterday,, 'it's almost like Larry Holmes and Muhammad Ali.' He looked at me and said, 'I'm not Larry Holmes.' And he is 100% right. It is two Muhammad Ali's when you talk about Jordan and Bryant." Grant Taylor (B/R 2011): "Players that come to mind are Bill Russell, Wilt Chamberlain, Jerry West, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Michael Jordan. But I've now officially put Kobe Bryant on this list, and judging by the title of this article, it is clear I'm not just saying he belongs with these players. No. Kobe Bryant is the greatest and most legendary of all these players." Charles Barkley: "Kobe Bryant is the best player I’ve ever seen other than Michael Jordan." Matt Barnes: "To me, Jordan is 1 and Kobe is 1B." Phil Jackson on who he'd pick to start a team with between Kobe and Jordan: “I’d do a coin flip and whichever one came up heads or tails, I would take that person.”

8/24MαɱႦα.Aɾƈԋιʋҽʂ🐐

137,075 views • 8 months ago

I have finally finished watching the video. Not only is Andrew Tate trying to teach men how to be masculine but he's also teaching them how to make money. Why do most people go to school? Because we all want to make money. That's the end result. Since we have been programmed as kids to go to school, study a course and end up being a civil servant who work for the benefits of the country, the government is indirectly make money from students who spends hundreds of thousands dollars in public schools. So, if you're going to teach over 300,000 students how to make money online and convince them that they don't need to do a four to seven course just to obtain a degree which they'll most likely not get a job in their field after graduation, in order words, making the government lose money from students slowly withdrawing from school and investing their money on a better, cheaper and more reliable option by doing online courses that will generate them money within a month rather than wait for years to graduate before using your certificate, why won't you see Andrew Tate as a threat? Now, you understand why the UK government are coming for him and why they initially offered him $50 million dollars which he rejected. They can't take him down legally, so which other way to? They monitored his lifestyle on social media and realized how free he is around women. So they send a woman. Not directly to him but through Tristan his brother since not just any woman can easily have access to him. Now she has had access to his home, she's literally has the right to make an accusation of what she saw inside his home and used the opportunity to lie on his name. After all, women are always seen as victims by the law while a man is always guilty until proven innocent. They accuse him of crimes they have no evidence to back up and regardless of what his lawyers says to defend him, the judge handling his case end up not judging it fair and square because they're being told what to do from a higher authority. When we have members of UK parliament and the prime minister talking about how Andrew Tate is a bad influence to young men, how do you expect him to have a fair trial? Now, you understand the injustice he has been facing since 2022, the raiding in his home, arrest and false accusations. All these because the British government fears his influence in young men and the success of his school is indirectly spoiling business for the government because now less people are interested in investing hundreds of thousands of dollars for a degree in school which will financially benefit the government rather more people are enrolling into his school. At the end of the day, all these are orchestrated plan by the UK government to take him down in any means possible which is why at some point, they even had to send him letters convincing him to commit suicide and leave as a hero. Who does all that if you don't see him as a threat? "Andrew Tate is a misogynist brainwashing young men with his deeply toxic messages." What makes him a misogynist? Because he teaches men to be masculine, not to worship women and how to make money online. The British government is corrupted and a shame. Anything that happens to Andrew Tate, hold them responsible.
1:14

I have finally finished watching the video. Not only is Andrew Tate trying to teach men how to be masculine but he's also teaching them how to make money. Why do most people go to school? Because we all want to make money. That's the end result. Since we have been programmed as kids to go to school, study a course and end up being a civil servant who work for the benefits of the country, the government is indirectly make money from students who spends hundreds of thousands dollars in public schools. So, if you're going to teach over 300,000 students how to make money online and convince them that they don't need to do a four to seven course just to obtain a degree which they'll most likely not get a job in their field after graduation, in order words, making the government lose money from students slowly withdrawing from school and investing their money on a better, cheaper and more reliable option by doing online courses that will generate them money within a month rather than wait for years to graduate before using your certificate, why won't you see Andrew Tate as a threat? Now, you understand why the UK government are coming for him and why they initially offered him $50 million dollars which he rejected. They can't take him down legally, so which other way to? They monitored his lifestyle on social media and realized how free he is around women. So they send a woman. Not directly to him but through Tristan his brother since not just any woman can easily have access to him. Now she has had access to his home, she's literally has the right to make an accusation of what she saw inside his home and used the opportunity to lie on his name. After all, women are always seen as victims by the law while a man is always guilty until proven innocent. They accuse him of crimes they have no evidence to back up and regardless of what his lawyers says to defend him, the judge handling his case end up not judging it fair and square because they're being told what to do from a higher authority. When we have members of UK parliament and the prime minister talking about how Andrew Tate is a bad influence to young men, how do you expect him to have a fair trial? Now, you understand the injustice he has been facing since 2022, the raiding in his home, arrest and false accusations. All these because the British government fears his influence in young men and the success of his school is indirectly spoiling business for the government because now less people are interested in investing hundreds of thousands of dollars for a degree in school which will financially benefit the government rather more people are enrolling into his school. At the end of the day, all these are orchestrated plan by the UK government to take him down in any means possible which is why at some point, they even had to send him letters convincing him to commit suicide and leave as a hero. Who does all that if you don't see him as a threat? "Andrew Tate is a misogynist brainwashing young men with his deeply toxic messages." What makes him a misogynist? Because he teaches men to be masculine, not to worship women and how to make money online. The British government is corrupted and a shame. Anything that happens to Andrew Tate, hold them responsible.

KING CHIDI

23,888 views • 1 month ago