Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This 1977 interview is from a documentary about Rene Caisse, a Canadian nurse who developed an herbal formula in the 1920s while caring for people with the c-word. She became known for tea called Essiac (her last name spelled backwards) that she used to treat 300 to 600 cancer...

maximumpain333's profile picture

🧬Maxpein🧬

269,119 subscribers

176,884 views • 8 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyHealth & WellnessEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Did you know that insurance companies can apply for waivers to sell plans that don’t meet the standards of network adequacy? It’s happening here in Texas and across the country. I recently received notification that an insurance company told the state of Texas that they couldn’t find an ambulatory surgery center willing to be in network with them in Austin. They lied. My surgery center wants to be in network with them, and they know that. They used that lie to justify getting a waiver to sell incomplete coverage to Texans. This isn’t just a policy issue—it’s hurting real patients, like the woman who waited months to be diagnosed with breast cancer because her plan quietly applied for a waiver to sell a policy without real access to mammograms. This is a dishonest abuse of the system. We must demand better.
2:32

Did you know that insurance companies can apply for waivers to sell plans that don’t meet the standards of network adequacy? It’s happening here in Texas and across the country. I recently received notification that an insurance company told the state of Texas that they couldn’t find an ambulatory surgery center willing to be in network with them in Austin. They lied. My surgery center wants to be in network with them, and they know that. They used that lie to justify getting a waiver to sell incomplete coverage to Texans. This isn’t just a policy issue—it’s hurting real patients, like the woman who waited months to be diagnosed with breast cancer because her plan quietly applied for a waiver to sell a policy without real access to mammograms. This is a dishonest abuse of the system. We must demand better.

Elisabeth Potter MD

16,620 views • 1 year ago

The nurse in charge of this woman’s care doesn’t seem to be taking her job seriously. The woman suffers from seizures. She was afraid that the nurse would neglect her so she set up her camera on her phone. She then proceeds to have multiple seizures while on camera. The nurse in charge of her was nowhere to be found but luckily another nurse walked by and saw what was going on and stepped in. The Dr let out a sigh in frustration that the woman was left alone like that while being cared for seizures. It’s one thing to be lazy and not like your job but when your job is caring over another life, the consequences need to be brutal, should she be fired and fined for her disregard for patients lives?
1:20

The nurse in charge of this woman’s care doesn’t seem to be taking her job seriously. The woman suffers from seizures. She was afraid that the nurse would neglect her so she set up her camera on her phone. She then proceeds to have multiple seizures while on camera. The nurse in charge of her was nowhere to be found but luckily another nurse walked by and saw what was going on and stepped in. The Dr let out a sigh in frustration that the woman was left alone like that while being cared for seizures. It’s one thing to be lazy and not like your job but when your job is caring over another life, the consequences need to be brutal, should she be fired and fined for her disregard for patients lives?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

405,232 views • 3 months ago

This woman worked for UnitedHealthcare in the claims department, she was taught “thousands” of ways to deny people “I'm here to talk about one specific claim” - A widowed woman would call 3x a day because UnitedHealthcare was taking her to court - Her husband had just passed from pancreatic cancer, and this was a hospice claim - They were already garnishing her wages, and this was less than 60 days after he died By the way, she was left with 5 boys by herself, she was a stay at home mom her whole life. She was just trying to figure out life There was absolutely no reason why we couldn't just submit this claim and be done, but they told me every which way to deny this to get her off of our phone line. It was absolutely despicable.” The claim they went after her for, from her now dead from cancer husband, was roughly $500,000. HALF A MILLION from a woman who had nothing
3:04

This woman worked for UnitedHealthcare in the claims department, she was taught “thousands” of ways to deny people “I'm here to talk about one specific claim” - A widowed woman would call 3x a day because UnitedHealthcare was taking her to court - Her husband had just passed from pancreatic cancer, and this was a hospice claim - They were already garnishing her wages, and this was less than 60 days after he died By the way, she was left with 5 boys by herself, she was a stay at home mom her whole life. She was just trying to figure out life There was absolutely no reason why we couldn't just submit this claim and be done, but they told me every which way to deny this to get her off of our phone line. It was absolutely despicable.” The claim they went after her for, from her now dead from cancer husband, was roughly $500,000. HALF A MILLION from a woman who had nothing

Wall Street Apes

9,640,121 views • 1 year ago

Here is the proof of how low she has stooped. After Sushant’s was gone, she never stepped up to reveal the truth or unfold the story they shared. Instead, she entered Bigg Boss and used his name constantly to gain sympathy and popularity. ​It’s a massive failure on the part of the police , they should have investigated her angle thoroughly. Being a part of his life for so long, she had answers, but she chose to use his memory for content instead of justice. What a huge miss by the authorities!
1:27

Here is the proof of how low she has stooped. After Sushant’s was gone, she never stepped up to reveal the truth or unfold the story they shared. Instead, she entered Bigg Boss and used his name constantly to gain sympathy and popularity. ​It’s a massive failure on the part of the police , they should have investigated her angle thoroughly. Being a part of his life for so long, she had answers, but she chose to use his memory for content instead of justice. What a huge miss by the authorities!

𝙅.

386,837 views • 2 months ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."
3:14

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 views • 7 months ago

WOW: Joe Rogan is convinced that “turbo cancer” caused by Covid-19 shots is not a conspiracy theory anymore. He just revealed that one of his friends got cancer “very quickly after vaccination.” “He was in his early forties, fit young guy, cancer came on like a f**king tidal wave.” And Rogan broke down where he suspects the turbo cancer issue is coming from: “They found SV40 in some of the mRNA vaccines.” “SV40 is simian virus 40, and it’s a virus that… people got because they used kidney cells from monkeys in order to cultivate these vaccines.” “And in certain batches, they’ve tested positive for SV40, which is like some just legacy material that they have that they make vaccines out of.” “I think it’s a contamination issue.” “Some of the batches had it and some of the batches didn’t, and then some people reacted very differently to whatever’s in it.” “There’s a s**tload of ignored cases of what they’re calling turbo cancer that people have gotten after the mRNA vaccine.” “It’s barely a conspiracy theory.” “It’s more likely an… inconvenient fact that these pharmaceutical drug companies are trying to ignore.” Joe Rogan Andy Stumpf
2:52

WOW: Joe Rogan is convinced that “turbo cancer” caused by Covid-19 shots is not a conspiracy theory anymore. He just revealed that one of his friends got cancer “very quickly after vaccination.” “He was in his early forties, fit young guy, cancer came on like a f**king tidal wave.” And Rogan broke down where he suspects the turbo cancer issue is coming from: “They found SV40 in some of the mRNA vaccines.” “SV40 is simian virus 40, and it’s a virus that… people got because they used kidney cells from monkeys in order to cultivate these vaccines.” “And in certain batches, they’ve tested positive for SV40, which is like some just legacy material that they have that they make vaccines out of.” “I think it’s a contamination issue.” “Some of the batches had it and some of the batches didn’t, and then some people reacted very differently to whatever’s in it.” “There’s a s**tload of ignored cases of what they’re calling turbo cancer that people have gotten after the mRNA vaccine.” “It’s barely a conspiracy theory.” “It’s more likely an… inconvenient fact that these pharmaceutical drug companies are trying to ignore.” Joe Rogan Andy Stumpf

Children’s Health Defense

215,627 views • 3 months ago

There is a beautiful Catholic tradition with that piece of cloth (manutergium) which was used to wipe the oil of chrism from his hands. The mother is to keep this cloth for the rest of her life. Upon her death, she is buried with it in her hands. As tradition says, when she arrives to the gates of heaven, she will present the cloth to show that she raised a priest who shared in Jesus's life and suffering.
0:44

There is a beautiful Catholic tradition with that piece of cloth (manutergium) which was used to wipe the oil of chrism from his hands. The mother is to keep this cloth for the rest of her life. Upon her death, she is buried with it in her hands. As tradition says, when she arrives to the gates of heaven, she will present the cloth to show that she raised a priest who shared in Jesus's life and suffering.

Erica 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

222,102 views • 7 months ago

There are moments in medicine that stay with you. This is one of them. Alma is sharing her experience and her story with you to make a difference. Alma and I are the same age, and we both work in healthcare. In 2021, she knew something wasn’t right. Her abdomen hurt and kept swelling. Her symptoms were addressed, but she was reassured that she would feel better soon. She visited multiple doctors and emergency rooms before finally being diagnosed with metastatic ovarian cancer at age 44. She was also found to carry the BRCA1 mutation. She found a wonderful oncologist and began treatment, but when her cancer progressed on the strongest medicine available to her, her doctor suggested that she go to MDAnderson for an alternate treatment. Alma has medical insurance, but says that when she reached out to MDAnderson, she was told it would cost $16,000 upfront to have her records reviewed and see a doctor for a second opinion. And this is only part of her story. There is so much more she has endured — more than can fit in a single video — and it deserves to be heard. Regardless of where you stand on policy, insurance, or systems, we can all agree that this is not the way insured patients should experience cancer. Her words that keep echoing in my mind: “Listen to your patients. We know when something is wrong.” Something is wrong, America. Let’s agree on that. Thank you for trusting us with your story Alma. Your voice matters.
1:28

There are moments in medicine that stay with you. This is one of them. Alma is sharing her experience and her story with you to make a difference. Alma and I are the same age, and we both work in healthcare. In 2021, she knew something wasn’t right. Her abdomen hurt and kept swelling. Her symptoms were addressed, but she was reassured that she would feel better soon. She visited multiple doctors and emergency rooms before finally being diagnosed with metastatic ovarian cancer at age 44. She was also found to carry the BRCA1 mutation. She found a wonderful oncologist and began treatment, but when her cancer progressed on the strongest medicine available to her, her doctor suggested that she go to MDAnderson for an alternate treatment. Alma has medical insurance, but says that when she reached out to MDAnderson, she was told it would cost $16,000 upfront to have her records reviewed and see a doctor for a second opinion. And this is only part of her story. There is so much more she has endured — more than can fit in a single video — and it deserves to be heard. Regardless of where you stand on policy, insurance, or systems, we can all agree that this is not the way insured patients should experience cancer. Her words that keep echoing in my mind: “Listen to your patients. We know when something is wrong.” Something is wrong, America. Let’s agree on that. Thank you for trusting us with your story Alma. Your voice matters.

Elisabeth Potter MD

30,467 views • 4 months ago

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle
0:31

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle

Glow Lee

92,179 views • 7 months ago

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”
2:35

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,691 views • 1 year ago

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı
0:12

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 views • 3 months ago

Can You Trust American Healthcare? ER nurse files a $7.5 million dollar federal lawsuit because she was terminated for refusing to falsify documents Patients die and she was told to “change her charting to omit” details because “It gives a lawyer a case on a silver platter” “I love a whistleblower more than just about anything in the entire world. And an ER nurse is suing her former employer, To Nova healthcare in Clarksville, Tennessee. it's a federal lawsuit. I assume it's a wrongful termination lawsuit, suing them for $7.5 million claiming that it is retaliation after she refused to change documentation in patients charts. So the lawsuit claims that there were two cases in particular, one in which a male patient died of cardiac arrest in the triage area due to a lack of open beds and proper monitoring. And she documented that there were not enough beds available. And the lawsuit claims that this was a violation of the Tennessee Public Protection Act and is an EMTALA violation. The supervisor directed her afterwards to change her charting to omit it because, quote, it gives a lawyer a case on a silver platter, end quote. And in the second case, the patient was exhibiting signs of sepsis, needed treatment, was waiting for a pick line and treatment. And I believe that they ended up dying because of a lack of treatment. And she documented there was a lack of safe staffing that led to this and she was told to omit that from the chart and refused and one month later she was terminated. So I am so glad that this nurse has lawyered up. I am sure that the attorney is pointing her towards OSHA and the NLRB and um, all the things. I'm gonna follow this case put someone put me in touch with her because you know I love a whistleblower more than anything and I hope she buys an island and retires after she wins this case.“
2:02

Can You Trust American Healthcare? ER nurse files a $7.5 million dollar federal lawsuit because she was terminated for refusing to falsify documents Patients die and she was told to “change her charting to omit” details because “It gives a lawyer a case on a silver platter” “I love a whistleblower more than just about anything in the entire world. And an ER nurse is suing her former employer, To Nova healthcare in Clarksville, Tennessee. it's a federal lawsuit. I assume it's a wrongful termination lawsuit, suing them for $7.5 million claiming that it is retaliation after she refused to change documentation in patients charts. So the lawsuit claims that there were two cases in particular, one in which a male patient died of cardiac arrest in the triage area due to a lack of open beds and proper monitoring. And she documented that there were not enough beds available. And the lawsuit claims that this was a violation of the Tennessee Public Protection Act and is an EMTALA violation. The supervisor directed her afterwards to change her charting to omit it because, quote, it gives a lawyer a case on a silver platter, end quote. And in the second case, the patient was exhibiting signs of sepsis, needed treatment, was waiting for a pick line and treatment. And I believe that they ended up dying because of a lack of treatment. And she documented there was a lack of safe staffing that led to this and she was told to omit that from the chart and refused and one month later she was terminated. So I am so glad that this nurse has lawyered up. I am sure that the attorney is pointing her towards OSHA and the NLRB and um, all the things. I'm gonna follow this case put someone put me in touch with her because you know I love a whistleblower more than anything and I hope she buys an island and retires after she wins this case.“

Wall Street Apes

813,031 views • 2 years ago

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 Her Name was Virginia Giuffre. ☠️ and Now She is DEAD. But her death is not the end of a tragedy; it is the beginning of a revelation that cannot be silenced, buried, or redacted. Because her life, her testimony, and her murder are part of a pattern that spans continents, generations, and empires. She was one of the very few to survive the machinery of ritualized child rape, not because she was lucky, but because she remembered and in this world, remembrance is the most dangerous thing of all. She remembered the men who used her, the hands that drugged her, the rooms that swallowed her innocence, and the names that no court would allow her to speak. She remembered the faces of power not as icons… but as violators. She saw presidents, princes, scientists, bankers, religious leaders, and intelligence agents not as symbols of order, but as predators in suits. She was one of the only ones who made it out alive… and dared to speak without a script. And now, she is gone. Not by suicide. Not by accident. But by orchestration. And her final words confirm it. “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. Do not let this go away. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.” That was her death pre-confession. A direct indictment of the system she knew would kill her. She gave the world one last lifeline to truth. And still, the silence deafens. The media buried it. The governments ignored it. And the people turned away… because to look into the eyes of her truth is to confront a world so broken, so backwards, and so drenched in hidden blood that denial feels safer than courage. But that era ends now. Because this story… her story; is not unique. It is the keystone of everything that’s been hidden. Virginia Giuffre was not trafficked by a random billionaire. She was trafficked by a networked empire designed to control the direction of the world through the systematic destruction of children. Her abusers were not just powerful… they were protected. Epstein and Maxwell were not lone wolves. They were the face of a global blackmail syndicate that operated through Mossad, CIA, and MI6… with diplomatic immunity, state funding, and access to every high value target on Earth. Children were not just abused… they were filmed. They were catalogued. Their trauma was encrypted into dossiers used to compromise, blackmail, and ultimately own the decisions of presidents, prime ministers, military chiefs, judges, entertainers, CEOs, and spiritual leaders. It was a system. A living organism. Designed to extract power by destroying purity. Epstein’s island was not a playground. It was a ritual site. Cameras in every room. Soundproof bunkers. Flight logs full of world leaders and household names. A sacrificial architecture masked as luxury. And behind it… binders of footage, lists of fetishes, psychological profiles, and AI-enhanced metadata to ensure that every participant could be broken on command. Maxwell wasn’t his assistant. She was a high level handler trained in psychological warfare and ritual abuse. Her father… Robert Maxwell;was Mossad. Epstein’s wealth? Synthetic. His ties to intelligence? Deep. His files? Still sealed. And the reason they remain sealed is simple… they prove that every nation, every system, every elite tier of global control is built on the trauma of children who were never meant to live long enough to speak. Virginia did. And so she died. Continued in Comments Below👇
3:35

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 Her Name was Virginia Giuffre. ☠️ and Now She is DEAD. But her death is not the end of a tragedy; it is the beginning of a revelation that cannot be silenced, buried, or redacted. Because her life, her testimony, and her murder are part of a pattern that spans continents, generations, and empires. She was one of the very few to survive the machinery of ritualized child rape, not because she was lucky, but because she remembered and in this world, remembrance is the most dangerous thing of all. She remembered the men who used her, the hands that drugged her, the rooms that swallowed her innocence, and the names that no court would allow her to speak. She remembered the faces of power not as icons… but as violators. She saw presidents, princes, scientists, bankers, religious leaders, and intelligence agents not as symbols of order, but as predators in suits. She was one of the only ones who made it out alive… and dared to speak without a script. And now, she is gone. Not by suicide. Not by accident. But by orchestration. And her final words confirm it. “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. Do not let this go away. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.” That was her death pre-confession. A direct indictment of the system she knew would kill her. She gave the world one last lifeline to truth. And still, the silence deafens. The media buried it. The governments ignored it. And the people turned away… because to look into the eyes of her truth is to confront a world so broken, so backwards, and so drenched in hidden blood that denial feels safer than courage. But that era ends now. Because this story… her story; is not unique. It is the keystone of everything that’s been hidden. Virginia Giuffre was not trafficked by a random billionaire. She was trafficked by a networked empire designed to control the direction of the world through the systematic destruction of children. Her abusers were not just powerful… they were protected. Epstein and Maxwell were not lone wolves. They were the face of a global blackmail syndicate that operated through Mossad, CIA, and MI6… with diplomatic immunity, state funding, and access to every high value target on Earth. Children were not just abused… they were filmed. They were catalogued. Their trauma was encrypted into dossiers used to compromise, blackmail, and ultimately own the decisions of presidents, prime ministers, military chiefs, judges, entertainers, CEOs, and spiritual leaders. It was a system. A living organism. Designed to extract power by destroying purity. Epstein’s island was not a playground. It was a ritual site. Cameras in every room. Soundproof bunkers. Flight logs full of world leaders and household names. A sacrificial architecture masked as luxury. And behind it… binders of footage, lists of fetishes, psychological profiles, and AI-enhanced metadata to ensure that every participant could be broken on command. Maxwell wasn’t his assistant. She was a high level handler trained in psychological warfare and ritual abuse. Her father… Robert Maxwell;was Mossad. Epstein’s wealth? Synthetic. His ties to intelligence? Deep. His files? Still sealed. And the reason they remain sealed is simple… they prove that every nation, every system, every elite tier of global control is built on the trauma of children who were never meant to live long enough to speak. Virginia did. And so she died. Continued in Comments Below👇

Noah B. Price

1,067,914 views • 1 year ago

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”
2:43

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Wall Street Apes

339,709 views • 2 years ago

“Dr. Josef Issels M.D. was a famous German cancer doctor. For 40 years, from 1947 until his retirement in 1987, Dr. Issels treated thousands of cancer patients. Dr. Issels said that in his 40 years of treating cancer patients, 97% of them had root canal-filled teeth. Dr. Issels insisted that they get these teeth removed before he began their cancer treatment. Cancer is a very dangerous place to play, because you get that little red spot on your forehead just before everything goes black when they pull the trigger. It’s one of the biggest industries in the United States. So if you mess with them, there’s a price to pay” - Dr. Hal Huggins/ one of the fathers of the whole body biological dentistry.
1:15

“Dr. Josef Issels M.D. was a famous German cancer doctor. For 40 years, from 1947 until his retirement in 1987, Dr. Issels treated thousands of cancer patients. Dr. Issels said that in his 40 years of treating cancer patients, 97% of them had root canal-filled teeth. Dr. Issels insisted that they get these teeth removed before he began their cancer treatment. Cancer is a very dangerous place to play, because you get that little red spot on your forehead just before everything goes black when they pull the trigger. It’s one of the biggest industries in the United States. So if you mess with them, there’s a price to pay” - Dr. Hal Huggins/ one of the fathers of the whole body biological dentistry.

JM&Co

41,097 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Shalini Singh, Special CP, Crime says, " Crime Branch has arrested 7 people till now. We had received information that fake medicines for cancer are being sold in the market...2 of the accused work in a hospital...their duty was to dispose of the empty vials after the cancer medicine was used...but instead of disposing of empty vials, they used to sell it for Rs 4000-5000...those who used to purchase it from them were also associated with the medical term...in Moti Nagar, they had two flats where they used to fill these vials, they used to buy random cheap injection liquids worth Rs 100 and fill them inside the vials of cancer medicine...investigation is underway. The supply chain has extended to Bihar so our team has gone there as well"
2:56

#WATCH | Shalini Singh, Special CP, Crime says, " Crime Branch has arrested 7 people till now. We had received information that fake medicines for cancer are being sold in the market...2 of the accused work in a hospital...their duty was to dispose of the empty vials after the cancer medicine was used...but instead of disposing of empty vials, they used to sell it for Rs 4000-5000...those who used to purchase it from them were also associated with the medical term...in Moti Nagar, they had two flats where they used to fill these vials, they used to buy random cheap injection liquids worth Rs 100 and fill them inside the vials of cancer medicine...investigation is underway. The supply chain has extended to Bihar so our team has gone there as well"

ANI

44,637 views • 2 years ago

Royal Reporter Emily Ferguson, shared that while visiting the Charing Cross Hospital in London today, “Catherine bonded with a volunteer who worked with chemotherapy patients who told them how patients and visitors ‘sit there for hours’. To that, The Princess, who is in remission from cancer and underwent six months of chemotherapy in 2024, replied: “I know”. ❤️‍🩹 Catherine then touched William’s arm next to her and said: “You know.”❤️ I also appreciated Prince William’s comment acknowledging his wife’s illness while addressing the NHS staff: “Both of us have had different experiences with hospital. Me working in the air ambulance, Catherine with her recent health journey and coming here today and reminding ourselves of just how important all the teams are.❤️ This is the best part about this couple and their relationship: it is a very secure marriage where there is no oversharing with the world. There is an intimacy between two people who know each other very well and support each other through the best and the worst times, without having to explain themselves to the world. Her comment “I know, You know” is truly powerful in that it shows all that matters to Catherine when it comes to her cancer journey is truly William and Her children🔥 She never needed the world to validate her or to believe her and that is why she has kept most details of her health battle out of the public sphere. To Catherine what always mattered is the support that William brought her and their children at her most vulnerable time. So she knows what she went through and William knows what they went through as a couple to get through 2024 and get to 2026 where they are today👌🏽 And that is truly all that matters to her🥂 #PrinceandPrincessofWales 📹Cameron Walker
2:19

Royal Reporter Emily Ferguson, shared that while visiting the Charing Cross Hospital in London today, “Catherine bonded with a volunteer who worked with chemotherapy patients who told them how patients and visitors ‘sit there for hours’. To that, The Princess, who is in remission from cancer and underwent six months of chemotherapy in 2024, replied: “I know”. ❤️‍🩹 Catherine then touched William’s arm next to her and said: “You know.”❤️ I also appreciated Prince William’s comment acknowledging his wife’s illness while addressing the NHS staff: “Both of us have had different experiences with hospital. Me working in the air ambulance, Catherine with her recent health journey and coming here today and reminding ourselves of just how important all the teams are.❤️ This is the best part about this couple and their relationship: it is a very secure marriage where there is no oversharing with the world. There is an intimacy between two people who know each other very well and support each other through the best and the worst times, without having to explain themselves to the world. Her comment “I know, You know” is truly powerful in that it shows all that matters to Catherine when it comes to her cancer journey is truly William and Her children🔥 She never needed the world to validate her or to believe her and that is why she has kept most details of her health battle out of the public sphere. To Catherine what always mattered is the support that William brought her and their children at her most vulnerable time. So she knows what she went through and William knows what they went through as a couple to get through 2024 and get to 2026 where they are today👌🏽 And that is truly all that matters to her🥂 #PrinceandPrincessofWales 📹Cameron Walker

Canellecitadelle

366,582 views • 6 months ago

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”
1:50

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”

The All-In Podcast

34,980 views • 2 months ago

Ladko se jyada Jihaad ladkiyan karti hai….. A minute of just pain due to Love Jihad A girl from Noida shares her story of how she was trapped in Love Jihad through one of her friend .A boy came in her life as common friend as a Hindu and convince her and her parents for marriage. After sometime the girl realized that the boy was Muslim. Later on she was forced to be convert but she denied, so the boy took her to Jangur Baba in Kolkata and there also she was forced to get convert. But she escape from that trap and now through her incident she awakened lot's of Hindu girls. In all this incident her parents didn't support her because they are afraid of "Log Kya Kahenge"
0:59

Ladko se jyada Jihaad ladkiyan karti hai….. A minute of just pain due to Love Jihad A girl from Noida shares her story of how she was trapped in Love Jihad through one of her friend .A boy came in her life as common friend as a Hindu and convince her and her parents for marriage. After sometime the girl realized that the boy was Muslim. Later on she was forced to be convert but she denied, so the boy took her to Jangur Baba in Kolkata and there also she was forced to get convert. But she escape from that trap and now through her incident she awakened lot's of Hindu girls. In all this incident her parents didn't support her because they are afraid of "Log Kya Kahenge"

Comman Man

54,648 views • 4 months ago