Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

THIS $2 AI VISUAL SETUP JUST MADE A $250/MONTH CREATIVE STACK LOOK STUPID he moves his hand, the particles react, and the whole scene updates in real time. no cloud render farm, no paid visual API, no expensive plugin chain quietly eating money every month most people still think... ai visuals require a stack of $39 tools, $89 subscriptions, and constant API usage. but here the loop is simple: TouchDesigner handles the visuals, a local model handles the logic, and the laptop does the rest the important part is not that the particles look cool. the important part is that the “brain” behind the visual no longer has to live on someone else’s server once that moves local, the monthly bill falls off a cliff this is probably how a lot of small studios start building visuals soon: not by renting 6 tools forever, but by owning one system that runs almost for freeshow more

Ridark

7,880 subscribers

15,948 просмотров • 29 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

$300/month for AI visuals. replaced by a laptop and $2 electricity bill TouchDesigner + Ollama. local AI model. runs offline. nothing sent to any server. no API key that expires mid-performance > Ollama: 3 commands to install. one line change in existing code > Llama 3.2: real-time parameter calls. fast enough you don’t notice latency > TouchDesigner: hand tracking. audio-reactive. particle systems. generative graphics month one savings: $148-338. every month after: same your laptop. $0/month. a visual studio that runs forever

$300/month for AI visuals. replaced by a laptop and $2 electricity bill TouchDesigner + Ollama. local AI model. runs offline. nothing sent to any server. no API key that expires mid-performance > Ollama: 3 commands to install. one line change in existing code > Llama 3.2: real-time parameter calls. fast enough you don’t notice latency > TouchDesigner: hand tracking. audio-reactive. particle systems. generative graphics month one savings: $148-338. every month after: same your laptop. $0/month. a visual studio that runs forever

NO1ennn

26,451 просмотров • 29 дней назад

This guy built a mini AI farm out of 4 Nvidia boxes It does not look like a data center. It looks like a stack of small machines sitting next to a laptop. But each box is a DGX Spark with Grace Blackwell inside, 128GB unified memory, and enough room to run models normal gaming GPUs cannot even open. Using the launch price from the article, 4 of them is almost $12,000 of local AI compute on one desk. That sounds expensive until you compare it to cloud GPUs. A serious AI builder can burn $1,500 to $3,000 a month renting A100s and H100s for client work, fine-tunes, agents and 70B models. He basically moved that bill from the cloud into hardware he owns. 4 Nvidia boxes. 512GB unified memory. No hourly meter running in the background. No rented GPUs eating the margin every time an agent runs too long. The funny part is most people still think local AI means a slow laptop running a toy model. Meanwhile guys like this are stacking compute at home. Save this, local AI is turning into the new mining farm.

This guy built a mini AI farm out of 4 Nvidia boxes It does not look like a data center. It looks like a stack of small machines sitting next to a laptop. But each box is a DGX Spark with Grace Blackwell inside, 128GB unified memory, and enough room to run models normal gaming GPUs cannot even open. Using the launch price from the article, 4 of them is almost $12,000 of local AI compute on one desk. That sounds expensive until you compare it to cloud GPUs. A serious AI builder can burn $1,500 to $3,000 a month renting A100s and H100s for client work, fine-tunes, agents and 70B models. He basically moved that bill from the cloud into hardware he owns. 4 Nvidia boxes. 512GB unified memory. No hourly meter running in the background. No rented GPUs eating the margin every time an agent runs too long. The funny part is most people still think local AI means a slow laptop running a toy model. Meanwhile guys like this are stacking compute at home. Save this, local AI is turning into the new mining farm.

Gipp 🦅

590,100 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

212,000 people stopped scrolling for a staircase. that's not luck. that's what happens when the visual is right. real estate has always sold on emotion. the problem was getting the visual in front of enough people. AI just solved that part. one scan. one video. organic reach to thousands of buyers. no agency. no crew. no $2,000 shoot. the full breakdown is in the article below.

212,000 people stopped scrolling for a staircase. that's not luck. that's what happens when the visual is right. real estate has always sold on emotion. the problem was getting the visual in front of enough people. AI just solved that part. one scan. one video. organic reach to thousands of buyers. no agency. no crew. no $2,000 shoot. the full breakdown is in the article below.

Dep

16,740 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Most video tools can generate clips. Very few can maintain identity. That has been the real bottleneck in AI video creation. Kling O1 changes that. For the first time, creators can carry a character, style, and visual language across scenes without constant fixes. You can reference past clips, assets, or images and the output stays consistently on-model. No visual drift. No rework loops. No “this doesn’t look like the last shot” moments. It feels less like prompting a tool and more like working with a creative collaborator that remembers context. The impact is practical, not theoretical: → Faster production cycles → Lower iteration costs → Noticeably higher output quality This is what mature AI tooling looks like. Not louder features. Not bigger claims. Just reliability where it actually matters. Consistency is no longer the problem.

Most video tools can generate clips. Very few can maintain identity. That has been the real bottleneck in AI video creation. Kling O1 changes that. For the first time, creators can carry a character, style, and visual language across scenes without constant fixes. You can reference past clips, assets, or images and the output stays consistently on-model. No visual drift. No rework loops. No “this doesn’t look like the last shot” moments. It feels less like prompting a tool and more like working with a creative collaborator that remembers context. The impact is practical, not theoretical: → Faster production cycles → Lower iteration costs → Noticeably higher output quality This is what mature AI tooling looks like. Not louder features. Not bigger claims. Just reliability where it actually matters. Consistency is no longer the problem.

Darshal Jaitwar

141,038 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This is a video of a village in China that, for some unknown reason, is now abandoned. Note that, favored by the local climate, in the short time of abandonment, the residences almost no longer look like man-made things. It won't be long before people say this was a village, and the unbelievers will say it's pareidolia.

This is a video of a village in China that, for some unknown reason, is now abandoned. Note that, favored by the local climate, in the short time of abandonment, the residences almost no longer look like man-made things. It won't be long before people say this was a village, and the unbelievers will say it's pareidolia.

Bronze Giant

25,541 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Seedance 2.0 is cutting huge production costs down to almost nothing. Visual effects that once needed big studios are now available to anyone with the right tools. AI is now part of entertainment, and this is only the beginning.

Seedance 2.0 is cutting huge production costs down to almost nothing. Visual effects that once needed big studios are now available to anyone with the right tools. AI is now part of entertainment, and this is only the beginning.

Aleena Amir

14,658 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This 47-year-old man from Japan made $14,450 in a month by creating an AI girl and turning her into a virtual influencer. He got tired of watching people hire a model and a photographer and an editor and a content manager for a virtual influencer and burn a budget on it. He built an AI girl from scratch and handed the whole operation to Claude. A project like that used to cost a team. His entire spend is $20 a month. No model. No studio. No team. Here is the exact breakdown: → First he built the persona herself: a face, a character, a backstory and a manner that the AI keeps identical in every clip → He films it simply: the girl is on top of the frame and he sits below in the same room and she repeats his moves and his face so the character reads as alive → The first free source is TikTok and the second is Reddit with photos and short videos and behind-the-scenes and both point to one link in the profile → From there Claude carries it all: it designs the visuals and writes the captions and shapes the content for the algorithm and posts on a schedule almost without him → From that link a person lands not on a pretty picture but on a subscription, a digital product or a private community The move that 96% skip: they polish the girl herself but the asset is not the face, it is the system around her. Make just a pretty AI girl and she dissolves into thousands like her within a week. Run two free traffic streams into her and a stack of ways to pay and the attention starts turning into money because people pay not for a picture but for access and a product and exclusivity. Here is what those $14,450 are made of. A private Patreon subscription: 700 people at $9.90 is $6,930. Digital products on Gumroad like photosets and wallpapers and prompt packs: 300 sales at $19 is $5,700. Affiliate offers for AI tools: 100 conversions at $12 is $1,200. Donations and paid requests added about $620 more. He grew the TikTok in 5 days: the clips pulled 1,500,000 views and 6,790 followers off a persona that did not exist a week earlier. Under the clips people argue whether the girl is real and that argument carries them further on its own. Not a single shoot day. Not a dollar on ads. Not a single hire. Just one AI persona. Two free traffic streams. And the discipline to build a system around her not just polish one picture. Half of you are already typing that nobody will watch a virtual influencer. The other half is already setting up an account for their first persona. Which half are you in?

Kaidu

48,471 просмотров • 13 дней назад

WHY ARE WE STILL ALLOWING BILL GATES TO THINK HE CAN RULE THE REST OVER THE REST OF US? WHO GAVE GATES THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT HUMAN BEINGS STILL MATTER AND WHICH ONES DO NOT? Bill Gates just said humans won’t be needed for most things. And that ”we’ll decide” who still matters. WHO IS THE 'WE'? Let that sit for a second. The man who helped build the digital world is now casually announcing that the people living in it might be optional. No panic. No apology. Just a quiet admission from someone who has never had to worry about being replaced. The scariest part is not the AI. It’s the ”we.” Who is ”we,” Bill? Because it is not the people whose jobs disappear next year. This is not a tech problem. It’s a power problem dressed up as progress. When the people building the tools also decide who needs them, the rest of us are just passengers. Do you trust the people at the top to make that call for you? Courtesy - Captains Obvious

WHY ARE WE STILL ALLOWING BILL GATES TO THINK HE CAN RULE THE REST OVER THE REST OF US? WHO GAVE GATES THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT HUMAN BEINGS STILL MATTER AND WHICH ONES DO NOT? Bill Gates just said humans won’t be needed for most things. And that ”we’ll decide” who still matters. WHO IS THE 'WE'? Let that sit for a second. The man who helped build the digital world is now casually announcing that the people living in it might be optional. No panic. No apology. Just a quiet admission from someone who has never had to worry about being replaced. The scariest part is not the AI. It’s the ”we.” Who is ”we,” Bill? Because it is not the people whose jobs disappear next year. This is not a tech problem. It’s a power problem dressed up as progress. When the people building the tools also decide who needs them, the rest of us are just passengers. Do you trust the people at the top to make that call for you? Courtesy - Captains Obvious

BelannF

14,510 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This guy built a visual scanner that reads 468 points on his face and 42 points on his hands from a regular webcam and turns them into a cloud of thousands of particles right between his palms. Inside, MediaPipe and TouchDesigner are linked: the first captures hands and face from the webcam with high accuracy, the second turns those coordinates into a live plane and feeds it into a POP system that instantly generates a swarm of particles in the shape of a head. No studio, no render farmer, no VR headset. Just a laptop, a webcam, and 1 TouchDesigner session. And traditional VJ studios keep teams of 5 people on a setup with lighting, custom hardware, and commercial plugins, while his expenses are only a TouchDesigner subscription and a regular USB camera. One laptop runs MediaPipe and TouchDesigner simultaneously, holds the camera stream at 60 FPS without drops, and in parallel processes 468 face points + 21 points on each hand. The camera captures frame after frame, MediaPipe in real time sends TouchDesigner the finger coordinates and face geometry, and the POP operator inside the engine translates those numbers into thousands of particle points with colors from bright pink to gold. This setup immediately defines the role of the tool and the limits of its autonomy. It knows where the fingertips are at every moment of the frame. It knows how to read the face geometry at any angle to the camera. It knows how to draw a swarm of particles between them with the right color and contour. → MediaPipe pulls 468 points from the face and 21 points from each hand, 60 times per second → TouchDesigner receives those coordinates, builds a virtual rectangle between the fingertips, and feeds it into the POP system → POP generates thousands of particle points in the shape of a head, coloring them in a gradient from bright pink to gold → The HUD layer adds green corners and a blue neon frame, styling the image like an AR interface → All layers assemble into 1 real-time frame that projects back onto the video in the camera window → The final image is recorded to a file or broadcast to a projector for a live installation And only when the guy spreads his hands wider does the plane between the palms stretch; brings them together, it narrows. Otherwise the system runs on its own. And when he moves from his home room to a concert hall, the same laptop with the same webcam launches the same TouchDesigner session in just 5 minutes, without reconfiguration, without a new team, and without a single line of new code. In his work setup there is no studio of his own and no team for assembly. On the desk sits a laptop with a webcam, on top run MediaPipe and TouchDesigner with POP operators, and the same setup through a USB camera moves to any concert without a new configuration. Out of everything I have seen this year, this is the cleanest Creative Coding setup on 1 laptop: 0 render farms, 0 studio lighting, and between them 3 libraries, thousands of particle points, and 1 webcam.

This guy built a visual scanner that reads 468 points on his face and 42 points on his hands from a regular webcam and turns them into a cloud of thousands of particles right between his palms. Inside, MediaPipe and TouchDesigner are linked: the first captures hands and face from the webcam with high accuracy, the second turns those coordinates into a live plane and feeds it into a POP system that instantly generates a swarm of particles in the shape of a head. No studio, no render farmer, no VR headset. Just a laptop, a webcam, and 1 TouchDesigner session. And traditional VJ studios keep teams of 5 people on a setup with lighting, custom hardware, and commercial plugins, while his expenses are only a TouchDesigner subscription and a regular USB camera. One laptop runs MediaPipe and TouchDesigner simultaneously, holds the camera stream at 60 FPS without drops, and in parallel processes 468 face points + 21 points on each hand. The camera captures frame after frame, MediaPipe in real time sends TouchDesigner the finger coordinates and face geometry, and the POP operator inside the engine translates those numbers into thousands of particle points with colors from bright pink to gold. This setup immediately defines the role of the tool and the limits of its autonomy. It knows where the fingertips are at every moment of the frame. It knows how to read the face geometry at any angle to the camera. It knows how to draw a swarm of particles between them with the right color and contour. → MediaPipe pulls 468 points from the face and 21 points from each hand, 60 times per second → TouchDesigner receives those coordinates, builds a virtual rectangle between the fingertips, and feeds it into the POP system → POP generates thousands of particle points in the shape of a head, coloring them in a gradient from bright pink to gold → The HUD layer adds green corners and a blue neon frame, styling the image like an AR interface → All layers assemble into 1 real-time frame that projects back onto the video in the camera window → The final image is recorded to a file or broadcast to a projector for a live installation And only when the guy spreads his hands wider does the plane between the palms stretch; brings them together, it narrows. Otherwise the system runs on its own. And when he moves from his home room to a concert hall, the same laptop with the same webcam launches the same TouchDesigner session in just 5 minutes, without reconfiguration, without a new team, and without a single line of new code. In his work setup there is no studio of his own and no team for assembly. On the desk sits a laptop with a webcam, on top run MediaPipe and TouchDesigner with POP operators, and the same setup through a USB camera moves to any concert without a new configuration. Out of everything I have seen this year, this is the cleanest Creative Coding setup on 1 laptop: 0 render farms, 0 studio lighting, and between them 3 libraries, thousands of particle points, and 1 webcam.

Blaze

38,242 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Cancelled ChatGPT -> Built JARVIS -> Pays $0 -> it works offline + it's smarter than the $20/month version. No WiFi needed, no cloud, no API keys, no rate limits, no queues, no $20/month just to ask a server in Virginia for the weather. Just a local model running directly on the laptop hardware, voice activated, system integrated, controlling apps, answering questions, doing the work. Iron Man had JARVIS embedded in his suit, this guy has it embedded in his MacBook and it works on a plane, in a basement, on a remote cabin with zero signal. OpenAI is burning $700,000 a day on infrastructure to deliver something this guy runs for free. Anthropic charges $200/month for unlimited Claude access, microsoft built Copilot into every product they sell. This guy skipped all of it, downloaded a model and made his laptop the smartest device in the room. No subscription. No login. No internet. No data sent anywhere ever. The most powerful AI assistant on earth is now the one running locally on hardware you already own. ChatGPT charges you to think slower, he pays nothing and thinks alone, he made it himself.

Cancelled ChatGPT -> Built JARVIS -> Pays $0 -> it works offline + it's smarter than the $20/month version. No WiFi needed, no cloud, no API keys, no rate limits, no queues, no $20/month just to ask a server in Virginia for the weather. Just a local model running directly on the laptop hardware, voice activated, system integrated, controlling apps, answering questions, doing the work. Iron Man had JARVIS embedded in his suit, this guy has it embedded in his MacBook and it works on a plane, in a basement, on a remote cabin with zero signal. OpenAI is burning $700,000 a day on infrastructure to deliver something this guy runs for free. Anthropic charges $200/month for unlimited Claude access, microsoft built Copilot into every product they sell. This guy skipped all of it, downloaded a model and made his laptop the smartest device in the room. No subscription. No login. No internet. No data sent anywhere ever. The most powerful AI assistant on earth is now the one running locally on hardware you already own. ChatGPT charges you to think slower, he pays nothing and thinks alone, he made it himself.

Defileo🔮

153,466 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

the thing you rent for $200 a month just became something you can own for $1,700 once but the money is not even the real story for the first time a 200 billion parameter model is not in a datacenter, it is sitting on a desk the cloud spent years convincing you a model this size needed their servers, their meter, their monthly bill people are stacking four subscriptions into a $440 a month bill to rent what one box this size now owns outright it needed a box the size of a book the moment the model moves from their datacenter to your desk, the whole game changes it stops being about who has the best AI it becomes about who ships it on every desk the cloud told you this needed a datacenter it needed a desk i did the full math on what this kills in the article below

the thing you rent for $200 a month just became something you can own for $1,700 once but the money is not even the real story for the first time a 200 billion parameter model is not in a datacenter, it is sitting on a desk the cloud spent years convincing you a model this size needed their servers, their meter, their monthly bill people are stacking four subscriptions into a $440 a month bill to rent what one box this size now owns outright it needed a box the size of a book the moment the model moves from their datacenter to your desk, the whole game changes it stops being about who has the best AI it becomes about who ships it on every desk the cloud told you this needed a datacenter it needed a desk i did the full math on what this kills in the article below

John Doe

24,757 просмотров • 13 дней назад

THIS DEVELOPER OPENED HERMES ON A LAPTOP, SPENT $0 ON API SETUP, SAVED 7 WORKFLOWS, AND CUT 2-HOUR CLIENT TASKS DOWN TO 14 MINUTES he is not giving a polished demo. he is just filming the laptop while Hermes runs, and that is why the clip works. you can see the terminal, the workspace, the task history, and the moment a normal chat tool starts looking like a local operating layer most people still run AI like a vending machine: 1 prompt, 1 answer, 1 reset. Hermes is different. after 5-10 repeated jobs, the useful steps start living inside skills instead of getting rewritten every morning the money math is where it gets ugly. $20 for Claude, $40-90 in API usage, $50 for wrappers, $29 for automation tools, and you are already near $140-190/month before you even sell the first report he used the same flow for 9 small research tasks: 18 competitor pages, 126 review snippets, 9 pricing checks, 9 summary drafts. the first one took 43 minutes. later runs were mostly review, edit, send that is the part people miss about Hermes. it is not trying to win the prettiest chatbot contest. it is trying to make repeated work stop leaking out of the machine every time the session ends

THIS DEVELOPER OPENED HERMES ON A LAPTOP, SPENT $0 ON API SETUP, SAVED 7 WORKFLOWS, AND CUT 2-HOUR CLIENT TASKS DOWN TO 14 MINUTES he is not giving a polished demo. he is just filming the laptop while Hermes runs, and that is why the clip works. you can see the terminal, the workspace, the task history, and the moment a normal chat tool starts looking like a local operating layer most people still run AI like a vending machine: 1 prompt, 1 answer, 1 reset. Hermes is different. after 5-10 repeated jobs, the useful steps start living inside skills instead of getting rewritten every morning the money math is where it gets ugly. $20 for Claude, $40-90 in API usage, $50 for wrappers, $29 for automation tools, and you are already near $140-190/month before you even sell the first report he used the same flow for 9 small research tasks: 18 competitor pages, 126 review snippets, 9 pricing checks, 9 summary drafts. the first one took 43 minutes. later runs were mostly review, edit, send that is the part people miss about Hermes. it is not trying to win the prettiest chatbot contest. it is trying to make repeated work stop leaking out of the machine every time the session ends

Gipp 🦅

14,544 просмотров • 19 дней назад

World Models are the path for some AI Models in the future. But how can we efficiently train these models to not only see the world the way humans do but to see the world in a new and unique way. By visualizing, what is normally sequenced audio patterns, we can derive much more insights. Here we see Paganini in a visual form that can than be described and transcribed into a World Model. We can observe connections in a manner that may not have been clear prior to the digitalization of music and sound in this way. The company with the most valuable potential in building a World Model is Tesla. Not that this type of visualization is being used, but that the mechanisms are in place, and the technology is in place for the company to thrive in this new form of AI.

World Models are the path for some AI Models in the future. But how can we efficiently train these models to not only see the world the way humans do but to see the world in a new and unique way. By visualizing, what is normally sequenced audio patterns, we can derive much more insights. Here we see Paganini in a visual form that can than be described and transcribed into a World Model. We can observe connections in a manner that may not have been clear prior to the digitalization of music and sound in this way. The company with the most valuable potential in building a World Model is Tesla. Not that this type of visualization is being used, but that the mechanisms are in place, and the technology is in place for the company to thrive in this new form of AI.

Brian Roemmele

57,424 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

> 8 GPUs in one server rig > dude went homeless to build it > electrical bill costs more than rent now > while everyone else pays $400/month to openai > a 2 GPU desktop kills the api bill forever > rtx 4080 super + rtx 5060 ti = 32gb vram > runs qwen 3.6 with 100k context locally > no rate limits, no api keys, no data leaving the room > agents loop 400 times for free > claude opus still wins on hard reasoning > but local handles 90% of daily work > $1,200 setup pays itself off in 4 months > bookmark this and read the article below

> 8 GPUs in one server rig > dude went homeless to build it > electrical bill costs more than rent now > while everyone else pays $400/month to openai > a 2 GPU desktop kills the api bill forever > rtx 4080 super + rtx 5060 ti = 32gb vram > runs qwen 3.6 with 100k context locally > no rate limits, no api keys, no data leaving the room > agents loop 400 times for free > claude opus still wins on hard reasoning > but local handles 90% of daily work > $1,200 setup pays itself off in 4 months > bookmark this and read the article below

starmex

167,058 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This Nvidia GPU farm sits in a spare room and prints $18,000 a month Ten cards running 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The setup cost $120,000 to build but it paid for itself in seven months. It does not mine crypto. It rents compute to AI companies that need processing power right now. Companies pay by the hour and the demand never stops. At full capacity the farm pulls $18,000 a month after electricity costs. The owner does not touch it. It just runs. Nvidia GPUs are the most in-demand piece of hardware on the planet right now. The companies that figured this out two years ago are already sitting on serious passive income. The barrier to entry is high but the people inside are not leaving. Follow if you want to understand where the real AI money is actually going.

This Nvidia GPU farm sits in a spare room and prints $18,000 a month Ten cards running 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The setup cost $120,000 to build but it paid for itself in seven months. It does not mine crypto. It rents compute to AI companies that need processing power right now. Companies pay by the hour and the demand never stops. At full capacity the farm pulls $18,000 a month after electricity costs. The owner does not touch it. It just runs. Nvidia GPUs are the most in-demand piece of hardware on the planet right now. The companies that figured this out two years ago are already sitting on serious passive income. The barrier to entry is high but the people inside are not leaving. Follow if you want to understand where the real AI money is actually going.

winkle.

22,626 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Most people think AI data centers are giant buildings in the desert. One guy installed four mini Nvidia AI data centers right behind his work desk and now they pay him every month. Each unit is about the size of a small fridge. Inside: Nvidia GPUs running AI workloads 24/7. He hooked them up next to his AC system and that was basically it. Now the company pays him a flat monthly fee for the electricity and Wi-Fi they use. According to him, it brings in around $10,000/month straight into his account. The crazy part: the units also cool part of the house, cutting his AC bill by roughly $600. That’s more than $120,000 a year from four AI boxes sitting inside his home office. His mortgage is basically being paid by AI hardware behind his chair. Quietly, regular homes are starting to become AI infrastructure. Save this post. You’re watching the next gold rush move into people’s homes.

Most people think AI data centers are giant buildings in the desert. One guy installed four mini Nvidia AI data centers right behind his work desk and now they pay him every month. Each unit is about the size of a small fridge. Inside: Nvidia GPUs running AI workloads 24/7. He hooked them up next to his AC system and that was basically it. Now the company pays him a flat monthly fee for the electricity and Wi-Fi they use. According to him, it brings in around $10,000/month straight into his account. The crazy part: the units also cool part of the house, cutting his AC bill by roughly $600. That’s more than $120,000 a year from four AI boxes sitting inside his home office. His mortgage is basically being paid by AI hardware behind his chair. Quietly, regular homes are starting to become AI infrastructure. Save this post. You’re watching the next gold rush move into people’s homes.

Shelpid.WI3M

974,778 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Jin is the Visual of visuals.

Jin is the Visual of visuals.

lamoo 🕊️

57,779 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The New York Knicks parade was so packed that a lot of fans had to stack up & watch from the sidewalk sheds in lower Manhattan in NYC. No, this is not Ai. This is 100% real 🤯

The New York Knicks parade was so packed that a lot of fans had to stack up & watch from the sidewalk sheds in lower Manhattan in NYC. No, this is not Ai. This is 100% real 🤯

CulturedUpdates

84,722 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Get the million-dollar brand look...without the budget. 🚀 You bring the idea, Fotor AI handles the scale. Instantly transform your concepts into studio-quality visuals and scroll-stopping marketing assets. This is what happens when AI finally understands brand identity, not just aesthetics. Thread on building campaigns that convert 🧵

Nawi

146,559 просмотров • 26 дней назад

AI in robotics gets all the attention right now, but sometimes the most interesting work is very practical. Viet built a small vision system that counts potatoes on a conveyor belt. No giant dataset. No huge model. Just a clear problem and a smart setup. He used Ultralytics’ ObjectCounter, trained a tiny YOLO11 nano model, and because there was no potato dataset, he annotated a single frame with SAM 2 and trained from that. One frame. Still works across the whole video. It is a good reminder that useful AI in industry often looks like this. Focused. Lightweight. Solves a real task. If you work in manufacturing or robotics, these small systems are usually the fastest wins. They save time, reduce errors, and do not need massive infrastructure. Nice work, Viet. His projects: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

AI in robotics gets all the attention right now, but sometimes the most interesting work is very practical. Viet built a small vision system that counts potatoes on a conveyor belt. No giant dataset. No huge model. Just a clear problem and a smart setup. He used Ultralytics’ ObjectCounter, trained a tiny YOLO11 nano model, and because there was no potato dataset, he annotated a single frame with SAM 2 and trained from that. One frame. Still works across the whole video. It is a good reminder that useful AI in industry often looks like this. Focused. Lightweight. Solves a real task. If you work in manufacturing or robotics, these small systems are usually the fastest wins. They save time, reduce errors, and do not need massive infrastructure. Nice work, Viet. His projects: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

1,674,814 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад