Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This 75 year old who'd been blind since birth suddenly regained his sight after using DMSO to cure sinusitis. DMSO has been repeatedly shown to heal eye issues medicine still can't solve like blindness and macular degeneration along with eliminating floaters and cataracts by it's unique affinity for concentrating...

3,043,127 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

这位自出生起就失明的 75 岁老人,在用 DMSO 治疗鼻窦炎后,竟然奇迹般地恢复了视力。 穆雷说,DMSO 几乎“立刻”就疏通了他的鼻窦,但它对他视力产生的效果简直“难以置信”。 他一生中第一次,终于能用左眼看到颜色。 而且在持续使用 DMSO 后,他的视力不断改善:能辨认细节,甚至能数出手指的数量——这些是他“以前从未做到过的”。 这听起来也许像巧合,但多次研究表明,DMSO 能修复许多现代医学仍无法治愈的眼部问题,如失明、黄斑变性、飞蚊症和白内障。 这简直是制药公司的噩梦——而它就这样公开存在,只要 20 美元一瓶。 This 75-year-old man, who’s been blind since birth, suddenly regained his eyesight after using DMSO to treat sinusitis. It cleared his sinuses “instantly,” Murray says, but what it did to his sight was “unbelievable.” For the first time in his life, he was finally able to see color in his left eye. And when he kept using DMSO, his vision kept improving: He could make out details and even count fingers, something he “could never do before.” It might sound like a coincidence, but DMSO has been repeatedly shown to heal eye issues medicine still can't solve, like blindness, macular degeneration, floaters and cataracts. It's Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. And it’s hiding in plain sight for just $20 a bottle.

🌹MIDNIGHT🌹ROSE🌹

16,470 views • 9 months ago

🧵1/ The children of Gaza & WB - revealing the Islamist palestinism death cult and UNTWA’s role in their use and abuse: 👉🏻To understand Israel in this war- you have to truly understand what we’re fighting. It took us 75 years, repeated monstrous terrorist attacks, that manipulated every ounce of our morality, countless monstrous statements by its leaders and one #October7th genocide attempt- for the majority of Israelis to understand that the group that defines itself as "Palestinian" is led by a palestinism death cult (with many leaders that were born in other Arab countries- like Egypt, Syria, Jordan etc. and with IRGC agenda and support) that sanctifies death for the sake of Allah - suicide and murder by and of children and all others are holy and for the sake of God (as opposed to death is a necessary evil for the protection of life and the values ​​of freedom) It took us 75 years to realize that this death cult is maintained by international organizations that call themselves "guardians of human rights and international law" and have many polite and whitewashed expressions in the language of the West (colonialism, oppression, occupation, apartheid, river and sea) with the purpose of justifying, advocating for and covering up of an extremist religious sectarian ideology - a criminal and corrupt palestinism-Islamist ideology - which sanctifies the blood of children for the purposes of the sect and in the name of "God (Allah)", that glorifies the murder of innocents because they are "Jews" or “the west” whom it defines in serial brainwashing as subhumans, pigs and monkeys - that must be destroyed in order to please Allah "from the river to the sea" and then also - to destroy the control of "the West" heretics. In this cruel and unimaginably tragic picture of reality - the children are both messengers of murder, victims who grew up to sanctify their deaths and also a product of propaganda to continue the blindness of the West and its use against itself and to continue this unbearable control and exploitation of children, in the name of the death of said children. Placing the children at the heart of the violence of this death cult and this cruel cynical use of them - poses new and impossible moral dilemmas that obviously serve the death cult that has never had zero care or interest in morality. It took us 75 years to wake up from the "two state solution" propaganda fraud and that awakening was painful. It took us 75 years to realize- that while we in Israel were singing and educating for peace, working for peace and trying to reach out for humanity in every way - the death cult loyalists across the border on the other side were dreaming, singing and teaching about the blood of Jews and the war of exterminating the Jews, they were training militarily from birth to die for Allah in the holy war in which they will kill as many Jews as possible and die for “Palestine”. Even since we left Gaza in 2005 and long before that from the PA territories in the West Bank - there were (are) groups in Israel and in the world that still talk about Israeli "occupation" as if it were Gaza and the West Bank - but there (in Gaza and WB) they talk about “the occupation of Palestine from water to water" "from the river to the sea" - Including Acre, Haifa, Tel Aviv. Meaning, “liberation from occupation" means the complete destruction of Israel, a complete genocide and ethnic cleansing of its people. For them it was for 75 years: Arab Palestine (although it never existed). This thread will show the methods of this death cult that is now pushing for more power and support through “self determination” - of a criminal cruel organization that is hijacking a people with UN help and support. The first clip is from the movie: “UNRWA AT WAR” - full movie is here:

Gal G., Adv 🇮🇱

146,905 views • 1 year ago

I found Royston's comments quite interesting, like so many other commentators he's managed to place all responsibility of what occurred on William and Catherine's shoulders, as well as suggesting it is their 𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘺 to repair the relationship (meaning 'get over it') So many thoughts.. 🤔 Notice that Royston says Harry 'does talk about a lot of stuff'. And 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 everything H has talked about - what he has said, and how that has impacted his family. Especially William, Catherine and their young children. Then Royston talks about there being times Queen Elizabeth had needed to put the 'national interest' and the 'country's interest' above her feelings as a person, and above the interests as her family. And that King Charles as monarch will need to do the same. But Royston then goes on to say it's in the Royal family's interests to solve their own family problems, and that they are supposed to show 'leadership' in Britain. And that it's not leadership, or healthy, advisable or wise to let conflict escalate and escalate, and that the public think families should be able to resolve conflict. So he's suggesting the family are not fulfilling their role by having 'unresolved' issues with Harry. He said QE had put her family (Andrew) aside for the best interest of the monarchy and nation, but he seems to believe that either KC or PW putting Harry aside (after doing everything he's done) is not in the best interests. Notice the different expectations for each problematic son? (What Royston says next he's previously talked about, when discussing H+Ms work with bullying. That the issues in KP demonstrated H+M's inability to resolve issues) 🤨 I have so many issues with Royston's comments. He says it's not good to have things 'escalate'. But things 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 escalating now, certainly not by William and Catherine's doing. Grey rocking is working. Royston seems to place responsibly for what happened in those two years (and since then) on William and Catherine, and KP. But we now know there were so many other issues occurring at the same time, that the problems were bigger than simply workplace squabbles. And when you consider 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦 that had happened in the decades 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 and the years 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 2017 - 2019, it's ridiculous to suggest this can be summed up as a 'workplace issue' at KP. I place a lot of responsibility for what happened with Harry and M on QE as monarch, and KC as father. H has had a lifetime of issues, and these were poorly managed by both his family and the monarchy. He is jealous, unstable, bitter and vengeful. And she is a histrionic narcissist. Harry and M were poorly handled, from the start. It should not have been KPs responsibility to manage them or deal with them. Anyone with any awareness of what has transpired over the last 𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 knows what Harry and his wife have done. William and Catherine have wisely set boundaries to protect themselves and their children. It's cruel to suggest they should risk their wellbeing, and what they are building and protecting for the children. William is not his brother's keeper. People need to stop infantilising Harry, who is in his 5th decade. He made his decisions - not every relationship can or should be repaired back to the way it was.

mrc 🦇

11,484 views • 1 year ago