This angry Karen thought she was in the majority 😂

And to answer her genuine question: Charlie Kirk was a very moderate, polite conservative. He was not extreme, not a wacky conspiracy theorist, not a misogynistic incel - he was normal. When you kill him for having polite civil debates, then dance on his grave, you show all of us how you actually feel about every one of us, as most of us are less polite and often more "extreme" than Kirk. We now know you want us all dead. We now know you will lie and slander us, then dance on our graves. We now know how you will treat our grieving widows and how you will laugh at our children and say they are next when we die. THAT is the line that was crossed.

Yeah I think the "line in the sand" is people realising that you fuckers will kill us over normal opinions

"Not a good debater.." "Racist, misogynistic, homophobic..." "Did not operate in good faith..." For fucks sake, you vacant-eyed lemming of Lucifer...you're literally quoting MSNBC's panel of pundits word for word...

She's suffering cognitive dissonance. She's never actually heard him debate and her mind is battling with itself about how her entire world view has been flipped upside down. She's finding out she's the baddie.

She is batshit crazy!

The reason why this hits so hard is Charlie was reasonable and very kind. If they would murder him, they will murder the rest of us. This was a wake up call of the evil of the left.

It's called murder

Hi 👋 I got you. To the Karen: Normies and the silent majority were just screamed awake by the public execution of a moderate conservative figure that people like you openly mocked, celebrated, and called for more of. Charlie wanted an open dialogue with your side and debate in good faith. You don't agree with him but that doesn't make his arguments disingenuous or entirely based on logical fallacies. Logical fallacies that you use copiously in your video: Ad Hominem - "incredibly racist, homophobic, misogynistic, and dangerous in general." Straw Man - "basically just used all logical fallacies in a debate and never entered into any good faith debate." Hasty Generalization - "people you would have never thought were MAGA" are now vocal, implying sudden and universal shift without sufficient evidence. Appeal to Emotion - repeated expressions of surprise and frustration with no logical analysis If you're tired of takes like this, I have a common fallacies and what to do about them infographic so you can shove it in their faces:

Someone should send her this

I'll answer. First, I think I know a little bit about debating. I was #3 at state in high school, I was #4 in law school moot court. I'll claim the moniker of expert. Charlie Kirk was an excellent debater. He would have left me and anyone I have ever witnessed in the dust. Second, either it is obvious you have never listened to Charlie Kirk and are just repeating heavily edited, out of context, soundbites, OR you are purposefully lying about what Charlie said in order to bolster your opinions. If you must lie to prove your point you have zero creditability. Now why is this different, because we are all seeing as true what we hoped was just hyperbole...your side will kill us because you disagree with our opinions, our words, our political ideology. If you are ever given power, you will do exactly what Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and all the other dictators who walked this earth. You will kill us because you know that we cannot win in the marketplace of ideas. We didn't believe it before. Now we do.

God save us from these morons. He’s not a good debater but you killed him for it.

You can always tell when they watched lefty edited clips instead of the actual debates in context because they all say the same three things: racist, homophobic, misogynist. It’s their mantra to anyone they hate.

@CPOWAAG She’s a “useful idiot,” for the Communists who actively try to take over this Country.. If ya didn’t catch this speech by JD Vance, WE CAN NEVER UNITE WITH PEOPLE WHO TAKE CHARLIE KIRK’s WORDS OUT OF CONTEXT.. (summary), you have to hear it!

Someone send this to her…

Bawhahahaha. They just don’t get it. It wasn’t CK, it was an American was killed in broad daylight, in front of his family and thousands locally, and millions upon millions have seen it online. If you don’t understand, you never will. He was a voice that gave everyone a voice.

That's the problem: We kept our mouths shut.

My answer to her, you will never understand. You are incapable of understanding. The regurgitated labels you placed on Charlie, tell me you are unwilling to listen to anyone but yourself.

I fully believe none of these people have actually taken the time to watch Charlie's debates.

Angry Karen should watch this

These people are so tiresome.

Yup they believe some how majority was on their side.. Wrong !!!

She's not in the majority - and she never listened to Charlie Kirk.

Charlie Kirk's murder was horrific because of how mundane and common his views were. What he believed was not controversial to the vast majority of the country. Trump wouldn't have won if that wasn't the case. The reason Charlie's murder shook so many people is if he's considered the line of "too far" then you're validating how extreme your mindset is if you're saying he deserved murder. And beyond that point, even if his views WERE horrific, there is no scenario where murder is acceptable. That's a line no one gets to cross outside of self-defense. If you're arguing otherwise then you need to be put on a watch list.

"What is it about this particular person, that's their line in the sand?" Perhaps the fact that he was assassinated in broad daylight in front of his wife and child? Just spit-balling here.

We're mad as hell & we're not going to take it anymore. The left fcked up.

Globalist Woke Liberal is dead. We won't argue, respond, listen to their word salads, vile insults and self serving logic anymore

This bitch is DELUSIONAL. She has not watched Charlie. Logical fallacies? Like what bitch?! NAME ONE! JUST ONE! Can you name one? Charlie could spit out facts and stats and quotes like he was a damn encyclopedia! He was brilliant and had a great memory! And he was brutally murdered in public for DEBATING PEOPLE WHILE HE WAS DEBATING PEOPLE!!! THAT’s THE LINE IN THE SAND BITCH! YOU TOOK AWAY SOMEONE LOVED AND RESPECTED!!! WHO NEVER DID JACK SHIT EVIL OR VIOLENT OR WRONG TO ANYONE!!! HE JUST DEBATED AND IT WAS FACTUAL YOU LYING CUNT!!!

Wrong - we are the majority wokes

"What am I missing?" Everything honey... You are missing literally everything...

said this many times - I don't anyone who would "film" themselves like this to voice an opinion...young or older. It's narcissism on a scale never seen before..