Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This astronomer quietly released the most irrefutable proof of UFOs ever. Beatriz Villarroel identified over 100,000 UFOs in photos of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. Her study is peer-reviewed. No one has debunked it. And these photos were all taken before we launched the...

Holden_Culotta's profile picture

Holden Culotta

152,615 subscribers

152,251 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This is the most definitive proof of UFOs ever: Astronomer Beatriz Villarroel found 100,000+ “light-reflecting objects” on photographic plates of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. And her study is peer-reviewed. These light-reflecting objects, or “transients,” are not comets, asteroids, or satellites. They’re UFOs—more than 100,000 UFOs in the night sky over a period of just 10 years. That’s an average of at least 27 UFOs per day. And for some reason, Donald Menzel, who was rumored to be part of Majestic 12, was caught destroying the photographic plates that had this rock-solid evidence of UFOs. Jesse Michels: “Palomar … was the most prominent observatory in use between ‘49 and ‘57, pre-Sputnik.” UAP Gerb: “And isn’t there data that Donald Menzel … was one of the ones stripping some of these plates out?” Michels: “That is from a book by Dorrit Hoffleit, who … was at Harvard with Donald Menzel and writes about this.” “Donald Menzel not only held extremely high clearances in just about every agency you could name, he was rumored to be Majestic 12.” “And he’s the guy caught destroying plates by somebody who’s very reputable, Dorrit Hoffleit.” “I think if you get one other observatory—if it’s pretty correlated, they have transients also from 1949 to 1957 that line up with what Beatriz finds, to me, that’s game over for disclosure.” “You’re talking about light-reflecting objects that aren’t comets, meteorites, meteoroids, asteroids, it’s not satellites.” “She’s clearly debunked all of that enough for … them to peer-review it.” Jesse Michels Gerb Beatriz Villarroel
2:47

This is the most definitive proof of UFOs ever: Astronomer Beatriz Villarroel found 100,000+ “light-reflecting objects” on photographic plates of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. And her study is peer-reviewed. These light-reflecting objects, or “transients,” are not comets, asteroids, or satellites. They’re UFOs—more than 100,000 UFOs in the night sky over a period of just 10 years. That’s an average of at least 27 UFOs per day. And for some reason, Donald Menzel, who was rumored to be part of Majestic 12, was caught destroying the photographic plates that had this rock-solid evidence of UFOs. Jesse Michels: “Palomar … was the most prominent observatory in use between ‘49 and ‘57, pre-Sputnik.” UAP Gerb: “And isn’t there data that Donald Menzel … was one of the ones stripping some of these plates out?” Michels: “That is from a book by Dorrit Hoffleit, who … was at Harvard with Donald Menzel and writes about this.” “Donald Menzel not only held extremely high clearances in just about every agency you could name, he was rumored to be Majestic 12.” “And he’s the guy caught destroying plates by somebody who’s very reputable, Dorrit Hoffleit.” “I think if you get one other observatory—if it’s pretty correlated, they have transients also from 1949 to 1957 that line up with what Beatriz finds, to me, that’s game over for disclosure.” “You’re talking about light-reflecting objects that aren’t comets, meteorites, meteoroids, asteroids, it’s not satellites.” “She’s clearly debunked all of that enough for … them to peer-review it.” Jesse Michels Gerb Beatriz Villarroel

Holden Culotta

63,280 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A top astronomer just revealed shocking evidence that over 100,000 UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. “Almost 15,000 per year.” Using digitized plates from telescopes at the Palomar Observatory, Dr. Beatriz Villarroel identified 100,000+ “transients,” or objects that reflected light like a mirror, that vanished in minutes. Her findings suggest that a high percentage of those were real UFOs—and they had a statistically significant correlation to nuclear tests and documented UFO sightings from the 50s. Jesse Michels: “You’ve basically found, pre-satellites in space, objects surrounding the Earth.” “How many of these ‘transients’ did you find?” Beatriz Villarroel: “Our original sample is around 105,000 transients from just the northern hemisphere.” “But we assume that it’s only one-third of these that are relevant.” “I don’t know how many of these transients might be associated with only one object, or if it’s like one object could give several of them.” Michels: “And you found this over what period of time?” Villarroel: “It’s over six years, it’s 780 hours of exposure time.” Jesse Michels Beatriz Villarroel
1:48

A top astronomer just revealed shocking evidence that over 100,000 UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. “Almost 15,000 per year.” Using digitized plates from telescopes at the Palomar Observatory, Dr. Beatriz Villarroel identified 100,000+ “transients,” or objects that reflected light like a mirror, that vanished in minutes. Her findings suggest that a high percentage of those were real UFOs—and they had a statistically significant correlation to nuclear tests and documented UFO sightings from the 50s. Jesse Michels: “You’ve basically found, pre-satellites in space, objects surrounding the Earth.” “How many of these ‘transients’ did you find?” Beatriz Villarroel: “Our original sample is around 105,000 transients from just the northern hemisphere.” “But we assume that it’s only one-third of these that are relevant.” “I don’t know how many of these transients might be associated with only one object, or if it’s like one object could give several of them.” Michels: “And you found this over what period of time?” Villarroel: “It’s over six years, it’s 780 hours of exposure time.” Jesse Michels Beatriz Villarroel

Holden Culotta

24,569 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 One of the world’s top astronomers, Dr. Beatriz Villarroel, has identified over 100,000 UFOs above Earth —her findings have been peer-reviewed by leading astronomers. This isn’t fringe anymore. The data says it all. Are we finally ready to admit we’re not alone
3:36

🚨 One of the world’s top astronomers, Dr. Beatriz Villarroel, has identified over 100,000 UFOs above Earth —her findings have been peer-reviewed by leading astronomers. This isn’t fringe anymore. The data says it all. Are we finally ready to admit we’re not alone

UAP Reporting Center

152,519 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨UFOS AND PEER REVIEWED RESEARCH. UFO sightings and nuclear tests aren’t just coincidence...this new study by Beatriz Villarroel finds a measurable correlation. We dug in with its author and a PhD from Vanderbilt to stress test the data. Documentary drops in 1 hour at 2PM EST!
0:33

🚨UFOS AND PEER REVIEWED RESEARCH. UFO sightings and nuclear tests aren’t just coincidence...this new study by Beatriz Villarroel finds a measurable correlation. We dug in with its author and a PhD from Vanderbilt to stress test the data. Documentary drops in 1 hour at 2PM EST!

American Alchemy

29,122 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Jesse Michels: “Do you think NASA has other propulsion methods?” Chris Bledsoe: “I think they’ve had it a long time.” “I know they were working on back-engineering UFOs a long time ago.” Michels: “Are the UFOs alien reproduction vehicles that … go into space?” “Or are they like-voltage chambers that are like portals, like in the movie Contact where you end up in some other dimensional?” Bledsoe: “I think probably both exist. I don’t know.” Michels: “And you think NASA is sitting on this stuff?” Bledsoe: “I don’t know that NASA is necessarily, but there are satellite groups that keep it under wraps.” “According to Tim [Taylor], there were two Air Force generals at the Pentagon that knew everything.” Michels: “Which generals?” Bledsoe: “He didn’t tell me.” “When you go to NASA mission control … it’s a square building with a long hallway in the middle.” “When you walk down this hallway, it’s glass on both sides.” “You look to the right, it’s all NASA scientists at their consoles.” “And you look to the left, it’s exactly the same, but it’s all Air Force people.” “And Tim’s in the middle of all of it.” Chris Bledsoe Jesse Michels
1:55

Jesse Michels: “Do you think NASA has other propulsion methods?” Chris Bledsoe: “I think they’ve had it a long time.” “I know they were working on back-engineering UFOs a long time ago.” Michels: “Are the UFOs alien reproduction vehicles that … go into space?” “Or are they like-voltage chambers that are like portals, like in the movie Contact where you end up in some other dimensional?” Bledsoe: “I think probably both exist. I don’t know.” Michels: “And you think NASA is sitting on this stuff?” Bledsoe: “I don’t know that NASA is necessarily, but there are satellite groups that keep it under wraps.” “According to Tim [Taylor], there were two Air Force generals at the Pentagon that knew everything.” Michels: “Which generals?” Bledsoe: “He didn’t tell me.” “When you go to NASA mission control … it’s a square building with a long hallway in the middle.” “When you walk down this hallway, it’s glass on both sides.” “You look to the right, it’s all NASA scientists at their consoles.” “And you look to the left, it’s exactly the same, but it’s all Air Force people.” “And Tim’s in the middle of all of it.” Chris Bledsoe Jesse Michels

Holden Culotta

42,795 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

**Just In** Avi Loeb on Beatriz Villarroel's groundbreaking transient studies: "Most likely cosmic rays or pre-Sputnik secret US satellites." This is an outrageous attack on Beatriz work from Avi Loeb who has recently been appointed head of the UAP Science Advisory Council for The White House. Avi Loeb also spent 6 months trying to tell us the 3I/ATLAS comet was an interstellar space craft coming to take over planet earth whilst also asking Congress for $1 billion to investigate UAP's. Beatriz Villarroel's peer-reviewed papers in Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and Scientific Reports stand strong. Analyzing digitized Palomar Sky Survey plates from 1949-1957, before any human satellites, her VASCO team identified over 100,000 brief star like transients. Many vanish in Earth's shadow, consistent with solar glints off flat, highly reflective artificial objects in high orbit, and show statistically significant correlations (>3σ) with 1950s UAP reports and nuclear tests. These aligned multiple transients passed rigorous scrutiny ruling out plate defects and cosmic rays, with independent validations confirming real optical signals through telescope distortions. Beatriz's careful, data-driven work deserves full scientific follow-up, not premature dismissal. Extraordinary observations in pre-satellite skies invite deeper investigation into what was really orbiting Earth.
3:05

**Just In** Avi Loeb on Beatriz Villarroel's groundbreaking transient studies: "Most likely cosmic rays or pre-Sputnik secret US satellites." This is an outrageous attack on Beatriz work from Avi Loeb who has recently been appointed head of the UAP Science Advisory Council for The White House. Avi Loeb also spent 6 months trying to tell us the 3I/ATLAS comet was an interstellar space craft coming to take over planet earth whilst also asking Congress for $1 billion to investigate UAP's. Beatriz Villarroel's peer-reviewed papers in Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and Scientific Reports stand strong. Analyzing digitized Palomar Sky Survey plates from 1949-1957, before any human satellites, her VASCO team identified over 100,000 brief star like transients. Many vanish in Earth's shadow, consistent with solar glints off flat, highly reflective artificial objects in high orbit, and show statistically significant correlations (>3σ) with 1950s UAP reports and nuclear tests. These aligned multiple transients passed rigorous scrutiny ruling out plate defects and cosmic rays, with independent validations confirming real optical signals through telescope distortions. Beatriz's careful, data-driven work deserves full scientific follow-up, not premature dismissal. Extraordinary observations in pre-satellite skies invite deeper investigation into what was really orbiting Earth.

Interstellar

30,905 просмотров • 15 дней назад

“The Vatican knows that UFOs are angels.” “NASA knows the voltage was like 33 million volts in one of these orbs.” “They know a lot more than we think they do.” Chris Bledsoe just revealed shocking secrets about UFOs he learned from the Vatican and NASA. Jesse Michels: “You have Saint Francis of Assisi who in 13th century, Brother Leo is right next to him, and he sees this angel.” “But if you look at the original Greek translation, it’s a flaming torch.” “[Diana Pasulka] thinks it’s his UFO experience, and that these wounds on his hands are actually electromagnetic damage.” Bledsoe: “Plasma radiation burns, that’s what NASA told me it was.” “Hal Povenmire was telling me that they knew the voltage was like 33 million volts in one of these things.” Michels: “So they have like a scientific model of how these angels work at NASA?” Bledsoe: “They know a lot more than we think they do.” Chris Bledsoe Jesse Michels
2:20

“The Vatican knows that UFOs are angels.” “NASA knows the voltage was like 33 million volts in one of these orbs.” “They know a lot more than we think they do.” Chris Bledsoe just revealed shocking secrets about UFOs he learned from the Vatican and NASA. Jesse Michels: “You have Saint Francis of Assisi who in 13th century, Brother Leo is right next to him, and he sees this angel.” “But if you look at the original Greek translation, it’s a flaming torch.” “[Diana Pasulka] thinks it’s his UFO experience, and that these wounds on his hands are actually electromagnetic damage.” Bledsoe: “Plasma radiation burns, that’s what NASA told me it was.” “Hal Povenmire was telling me that they knew the voltage was like 33 million volts in one of these things.” Michels: “So they have like a scientific model of how these angels work at NASA?” Bledsoe: “They know a lot more than we think they do.” Chris Bledsoe Jesse Michels

Holden Culotta

489,422 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨Dr. Beatriz Villarroel Interview With Peter Skafish for the Sol Foundation The conversation turned from astronomy to something much stranger, and potentially historic. Villarroel’s team, working through the VASCO Project, had already published peer reviewed evidence of artificial reflective objects in Earth orbit before Sputnik. But she and collaborator Steven Bruehl have uncovered something else, a triangle of correlations linking transient sky events, above ground nuclear test detonations and well documented UAP sightings. “Steven Bruehl took the samples of nuclear tests, the VASCO transients, and the UFO catalog,” Villarroel explained. “He asked whether these coincidences during events like the 1952 Washington D.C. flap were statistically connected.” The result was a measurable correlation around 3 sigma between UFO events and nuclear tests, and similar correlations linking transients, UAPs and transients and nuclear detonations. That may sound subtle, but statistically, a 3 sigma signal means it’s very unlikely to be random noise, and it directly contradicts the claim that these photographic transients were simply plate defects. “If it were just plate defects, you wouldn’t see correlations appear in time with nuclear tests or UFO flaps,” she said. “This defies that hypothesis.” The idea that nuclear activity attracts non human observation has been part of UFO lore since the 1940s. Now, for the first time, there’s a data driven bridge between the legends and empirical evidence, connecting transient light events, nuclear detonations, and UAP activity. Skafish summed it up: “You don’t just have a correlation between two things, you’ve got a correlation between three, and in all directions.” Whether that means surveillance, energy resonance, or a reactive phenomenon isn’t yet clear. But Villarroel’s work gives future scientists a map of places and times where something, perhaps watching, perhaps responding, seems to manifest when humanity tampers with atomic fire. Watch The Full Interview Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #SolFoundation #VASCOProject #UAP #NuclearCorrelation #Disclosure #SkywatchSignal
3:05

🚨Dr. Beatriz Villarroel Interview With Peter Skafish for the Sol Foundation The conversation turned from astronomy to something much stranger, and potentially historic. Villarroel’s team, working through the VASCO Project, had already published peer reviewed evidence of artificial reflective objects in Earth orbit before Sputnik. But she and collaborator Steven Bruehl have uncovered something else, a triangle of correlations linking transient sky events, above ground nuclear test detonations and well documented UAP sightings. “Steven Bruehl took the samples of nuclear tests, the VASCO transients, and the UFO catalog,” Villarroel explained. “He asked whether these coincidences during events like the 1952 Washington D.C. flap were statistically connected.” The result was a measurable correlation around 3 sigma between UFO events and nuclear tests, and similar correlations linking transients, UAPs and transients and nuclear detonations. That may sound subtle, but statistically, a 3 sigma signal means it’s very unlikely to be random noise, and it directly contradicts the claim that these photographic transients were simply plate defects. “If it were just plate defects, you wouldn’t see correlations appear in time with nuclear tests or UFO flaps,” she said. “This defies that hypothesis.” The idea that nuclear activity attracts non human observation has been part of UFO lore since the 1940s. Now, for the first time, there’s a data driven bridge between the legends and empirical evidence, connecting transient light events, nuclear detonations, and UAP activity. Skafish summed it up: “You don’t just have a correlation between two things, you’ve got a correlation between three, and in all directions.” Whether that means surveillance, energy resonance, or a reactive phenomenon isn’t yet clear. But Villarroel’s work gives future scientists a map of places and times where something, perhaps watching, perhaps responding, seems to manifest when humanity tampers with atomic fire. Watch The Full Interview Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #SolFoundation #VASCOProject #UAP #NuclearCorrelation #Disclosure #SkywatchSignal

Skywatch Signal

16,527 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 THIS UFO STUDY WILL BREAK THE INTERNET. Years before the space program objects were photographed orbiting the Earth!? 🛸 Dr. Beatriz Villarroel lead a study into photographs of the night sky taken BEFORE satellites were invented (1957). Her team discovered that satellite-like objects were in orbit as early as 1948. Even more interesting is that the number of orbital objects in the photos increased during UFO sightings like the D.C. ufo wave of 1952. Shit just got weird. 🤯
4:59

🚨 THIS UFO STUDY WILL BREAK THE INTERNET. Years before the space program objects were photographed orbiting the Earth!? 🛸 Dr. Beatriz Villarroel lead a study into photographs of the night sky taken BEFORE satellites were invented (1957). Her team discovered that satellite-like objects were in orbit as early as 1948. Even more interesting is that the number of orbital objects in the photos increased during UFO sightings like the D.C. ufo wave of 1952. Shit just got weird. 🤯

TUPACABRA

84,930 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 Sabine Hossenfelder Just Covered Beatriz Villarroel’s Latest UAP Papers For the first time, a mainstream physicist is saying it out loud, and not just any physicist! Sabine says: “We have images of likely artificial objects orbiting Earth before Sputnik.” Five transients, in perfect lines on old photographic plates from 1949–1957. Each dot reflecting sunlight showing objects that vanish in Earth’s shadow. Beatriz Villarroel’s team at Nordita just dropped peer reviewed work showing these patterns are statistically real, not film dust or noise (22 sigma significance). And Hossenfelder, one of the most skeptical voices in physics looked at the data and called it: “The most convincing evidence of unidentified aerial phenomena I’ve seen.” Watch The Full Thing Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #Disclosure #SabineHossenfelder #Science
5:00

🚨 Sabine Hossenfelder Just Covered Beatriz Villarroel’s Latest UAP Papers For the first time, a mainstream physicist is saying it out loud, and not just any physicist! Sabine says: “We have images of likely artificial objects orbiting Earth before Sputnik.” Five transients, in perfect lines on old photographic plates from 1949–1957. Each dot reflecting sunlight showing objects that vanish in Earth’s shadow. Beatriz Villarroel’s team at Nordita just dropped peer reviewed work showing these patterns are statistically real, not film dust or noise (22 sigma significance). And Hossenfelder, one of the most skeptical voices in physics looked at the data and called it: “The most convincing evidence of unidentified aerial phenomena I’ve seen.” Watch The Full Thing Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #Disclosure #SabineHossenfelder #Science

Skywatch Signal

47,604 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🪞 What are these Transients? 🪞 "I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes?" ~Beatriz "Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious." ~SH (I tweeted out SH's video yesterday, and today, I decided to transcribe it bc she does a very good job summarizing the issues at hand. She has a Bachelor's degree in mathematics and a PhD in physics.) Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "Today, I have a group of astrophysicists who found the most convincing evidence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena that I've seen. Concretely, they say they have images of likely artificial objects that were in orbit around Earth before we had the first satellites up there. I've had a look. "This research comes from astrophysicists at Nordita (the Nordic Institute of Theoretical Physics - Nordita) in Stockholm, and they just published two papers. They used a catalog of old photographic plates from 1949 to 1957 taken in California at Caltech that have been digitized. "Why until 1957? Because in 1957 the Russians launched the first ever satellite into orbit, or at least the first satellite that we know of. In those scans of old photographic plates, they look for bright spots that appear only briefly, which are called transients. They did this first by computer analysis, but then also by just looking at the images. "Here is an example of two images of the exact same spot in the sky taken briefly after each other. One shows, well, something. The other one, not. But these old image scans can contain defects and dust and so on, so they only considered cases where the transients were in the same place in multiple scans of the same photographic plate. Then one can be sure that at least it's not an artifact from the scan. "They found a total of five such transients, and they aren't single dots. They are configurations of four, five, and in one case, six dots in a row. And one of those with five in a row is dated to July 27, 1952. No, that isn't my birthday. This is the weekend of one of the famous Washington DC UFO days, known as the Washington flap. On this day, and also a week earlier, air traffic controllers at the city's main airport and nearby Air Force Base said they saw things on radar that shouldn't have been there. Some pilots and people on the ground also reported unusual lights. The fuss was big enough that the Air Force held a press conference on July 29th and blamed atmospheric phenomena." Maj. General John A. Stamford: "We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States." Sabine: "But back to the astrophysicists with their papers. They also look at all these transients, so not just those that appear in multiple scans. From this, they find that the transients are far less likely to appear in the Earth's shadow. This is statistically significant at 22 sigma. What this means is that the transients are likely to be from something that reflects sunlight, and it makes it unlikely that it's something to do with the camera. "If that was already confusing enough, in the other paper, they look at correlations between all transients and reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and nuclear tests. They find a weak correlation with UAP reports, other transients were 35% more likely within a one-day window around a nuclear bomb test. This pattern is hard to blame on bad film alone. "They consider different explanations on the papers, such as foreground objects, but these would be much more blurry or camera glitches, but these would not disappear in the Earth's shadow. It could have something to do with the nuclear fallout, but again, why would this disappear in the Earth's shadow? "Beatriz Villarroel, one of the authors of both papers, told me by email: "With my existing limited knowledge, these objects look highly artificial to me. Only something really planar and reflective can give off those transients. Any round or rough body would result in streaks, and I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes -it's open for speculation." ~Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (planar: having a flat or level surface that continues in all directions. ~Cambridge Dictionary) Sabine: "It's possible, but it seems highly unlikely to me, that any nation had multiple satellites in the sky before the Russian Sputnik launch. This is because it isn't all that easy to launch a rocket without anyone noticing, and you can't do it from anywhere, either. 'It's possible that these objects are of natural origin, but then what are they? Or are they image artifacts that are more likely to occur in sunlight? Maybe something to do with solar wind? I don't have a good explanation, and honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about this one way or the other, I just find it very curious. Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious. Five dots in a row? That's very disciplined dust. What do you think about this? Is it aliens?"
5:05

🪞 What are these Transients? 🪞 "I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes?" ~Beatriz "Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious." ~SH (I tweeted out SH's video yesterday, and today, I decided to transcribe it bc she does a very good job summarizing the issues at hand. She has a Bachelor's degree in mathematics and a PhD in physics.) Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "Today, I have a group of astrophysicists who found the most convincing evidence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena that I've seen. Concretely, they say they have images of likely artificial objects that were in orbit around Earth before we had the first satellites up there. I've had a look. "This research comes from astrophysicists at Nordita (the Nordic Institute of Theoretical Physics - Nordita) in Stockholm, and they just published two papers. They used a catalog of old photographic plates from 1949 to 1957 taken in California at Caltech that have been digitized. "Why until 1957? Because in 1957 the Russians launched the first ever satellite into orbit, or at least the first satellite that we know of. In those scans of old photographic plates, they look for bright spots that appear only briefly, which are called transients. They did this first by computer analysis, but then also by just looking at the images. "Here is an example of two images of the exact same spot in the sky taken briefly after each other. One shows, well, something. The other one, not. But these old image scans can contain defects and dust and so on, so they only considered cases where the transients were in the same place in multiple scans of the same photographic plate. Then one can be sure that at least it's not an artifact from the scan. "They found a total of five such transients, and they aren't single dots. They are configurations of four, five, and in one case, six dots in a row. And one of those with five in a row is dated to July 27, 1952. No, that isn't my birthday. This is the weekend of one of the famous Washington DC UFO days, known as the Washington flap. On this day, and also a week earlier, air traffic controllers at the city's main airport and nearby Air Force Base said they saw things on radar that shouldn't have been there. Some pilots and people on the ground also reported unusual lights. The fuss was big enough that the Air Force held a press conference on July 29th and blamed atmospheric phenomena." Maj. General John A. Stamford: "We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States." Sabine: "But back to the astrophysicists with their papers. They also look at all these transients, so not just those that appear in multiple scans. From this, they find that the transients are far less likely to appear in the Earth's shadow. This is statistically significant at 22 sigma. What this means is that the transients are likely to be from something that reflects sunlight, and it makes it unlikely that it's something to do with the camera. "If that was already confusing enough, in the other paper, they look at correlations between all transients and reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and nuclear tests. They find a weak correlation with UAP reports, other transients were 35% more likely within a one-day window around a nuclear bomb test. This pattern is hard to blame on bad film alone. "They consider different explanations on the papers, such as foreground objects, but these would be much more blurry or camera glitches, but these would not disappear in the Earth's shadow. It could have something to do with the nuclear fallout, but again, why would this disappear in the Earth's shadow? "Beatriz Villarroel, one of the authors of both papers, told me by email: "With my existing limited knowledge, these objects look highly artificial to me. Only something really planar and reflective can give off those transients. Any round or rough body would result in streaks, and I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes -it's open for speculation." ~Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (planar: having a flat or level surface that continues in all directions. ~Cambridge Dictionary) Sabine: "It's possible, but it seems highly unlikely to me, that any nation had multiple satellites in the sky before the Russian Sputnik launch. This is because it isn't all that easy to launch a rocket without anyone noticing, and you can't do it from anywhere, either. 'It's possible that these objects are of natural origin, but then what are they? Or are they image artifacts that are more likely to occur in sunlight? Maybe something to do with solar wind? I don't have a good explanation, and honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about this one way or the other, I just find it very curious. Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious. Five dots in a row? That's very disciplined dust. What do you think about this? Is it aliens?"

Joe Murgia

17,157 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨Jesse Michels: Talks UFOs and Aliens... Know Thyself "In this conversation, Jesse Michels joins André Duqum to explore a question that’s becoming harder to dismiss: what if the phenomenon we call UFOs points to something real—and we don’t yet know what it is? Rather than arguing for belief or disbelief, this episode is an invitation to curiosity, careful inquiry, and intellectual honesty about the limits of our current understanding." Source:
1:15

🚨Jesse Michels: Talks UFOs and Aliens... Know Thyself "In this conversation, Jesse Michels joins André Duqum to explore a question that’s becoming harder to dismiss: what if the phenomenon we call UFOs points to something real—and we don’t yet know what it is? Rather than arguing for belief or disbelief, this episode is an invitation to curiosity, careful inquiry, and intellectual honesty about the limits of our current understanding." Source:

Skywatch Signal

28,628 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨The Evidence Might Already Exist We Just Never Looked Beatriz Villarroel isn't scanning the sky for UFOs in real time. She's digging through astronomical photographs taken before satellites even existed. Working with glass plates from the 1950s, Villarroel found star like objects that appear and vanish within an hour. Not one or two, in one case, nine. In another, five flashes aligned along a perfect line, with odds of random alignment at roughly 1 in 10,000. Stars just don't do that. Supernovae don't even do that. Plate defects don't even explain it away. The other thing we need to remember is that this was before Sputnik. Whatever caused it, it definitely wasn't us. As always she's cautious and methodical. She doesn't claim proof of ET probes. But her work exposes a very real possibility, that the search for non human technology may not be about new telescopes at all… it may be about reexamining old data we ignored. I am posting about this again because Beatriz made it into the National Geographic. Kudos to Beatriz and her team. #UAP #UFO #BeatrizVillarroel #Astronomy #Disclosure #SETI #Skywatch #Anomalies
4:44

🚨The Evidence Might Already Exist We Just Never Looked Beatriz Villarroel isn't scanning the sky for UFOs in real time. She's digging through astronomical photographs taken before satellites even existed. Working with glass plates from the 1950s, Villarroel found star like objects that appear and vanish within an hour. Not one or two, in one case, nine. In another, five flashes aligned along a perfect line, with odds of random alignment at roughly 1 in 10,000. Stars just don't do that. Supernovae don't even do that. Plate defects don't even explain it away. The other thing we need to remember is that this was before Sputnik. Whatever caused it, it definitely wasn't us. As always she's cautious and methodical. She doesn't claim proof of ET probes. But her work exposes a very real possibility, that the search for non human technology may not be about new telescopes at all… it may be about reexamining old data we ignored. I am posting about this again because Beatriz made it into the National Geographic. Kudos to Beatriz and her team. #UAP #UFO #BeatrizVillarroel #Astronomy #Disclosure #SETI #Skywatch #Anomalies

Skywatch Signal

139,965 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨NASA researcher confirms Transients, Beatriz Villarroel and VASCO vindicated! "PhD astronomer and former NASA engineer Ivo Busko has single-handedly driven a final nail into the coffin of the contamination-based hypotheses (e.g. plate defects and cosmic rays) proposed to explain the VASCO transients."~Beatriz Villarroel What do you have to say now Avi Loeb? 'Sorry' might be a good place to start! #ufotwitter #uapX Source:
1:27

🚨NASA researcher confirms Transients, Beatriz Villarroel and VASCO vindicated! "PhD astronomer and former NASA engineer Ivo Busko has single-handedly driven a final nail into the coffin of the contamination-based hypotheses (e.g. plate defects and cosmic rays) proposed to explain the VASCO transients."~Beatriz Villarroel What do you have to say now Avi Loeb? 'Sorry' might be a good place to start! #ufotwitter #uapX Source:

Skywatch Signal

41,390 просмотров • 19 дней назад

This CIA historian just revealed how the CIA uses psychic warfare to make UFOs, vampires, ghosts, and religious figures appear using holograms. Peter Levenda: “They did it during MKUltra, they did it during Bluebird, during Artichoke, Operation MKOFTEN.” “It was on the books as early as the 1950s and 1960s.” Michels: “And how would UFOs be used in that context?” Levenda: “Think of how Aquino used psychological warfare in Vietnam.” “The Vietnamese believed, in certain villages and stuff, they believed in vampires, they believed in ghosts.” “They exploited that. They made them appear.” “What’s the difference between that and a UFO sighting?” “Go to some small town, shine some lights in the sky and then have somebody appear and say something, and then disappear again, freaking out a family of five on a picnic or something.” Michels: “Do you think UFOs can be staged?” Levenda: “We’ve tried it.” “The CIA even had this idea in their head, they were going to have Jesus appear as a vision over Havana to convince the Cubans to overthrow Castro.” “That was on the books.” “They were gonna use holograms or something to make this thing appear.” “And that was back in the 70s. So we know how to do this kind of stuff.” “We could make things appear and disappear with stagecraft.” Jesse Michels Peter Levenda
2:26

This CIA historian just revealed how the CIA uses psychic warfare to make UFOs, vampires, ghosts, and religious figures appear using holograms. Peter Levenda: “They did it during MKUltra, they did it during Bluebird, during Artichoke, Operation MKOFTEN.” “It was on the books as early as the 1950s and 1960s.” Michels: “And how would UFOs be used in that context?” Levenda: “Think of how Aquino used psychological warfare in Vietnam.” “The Vietnamese believed, in certain villages and stuff, they believed in vampires, they believed in ghosts.” “They exploited that. They made them appear.” “What’s the difference between that and a UFO sighting?” “Go to some small town, shine some lights in the sky and then have somebody appear and say something, and then disappear again, freaking out a family of five on a picnic or something.” Michels: “Do you think UFOs can be staged?” Levenda: “We’ve tried it.” “The CIA even had this idea in their head, they were going to have Jesus appear as a vision over Havana to convince the Cubans to overthrow Castro.” “That was on the books.” “They were gonna use holograms or something to make this thing appear.” “And that was back in the 70s. So we know how to do this kind of stuff.” “We could make things appear and disappear with stagecraft.” Jesse Michels Peter Levenda

Holden Culotta

109,501 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Available late tonight for YouTube members and tomorrow at 2 PM EST, 11 AM PST for everyone. The most in depth exploration of Beatriz’ (⁦Beatriz Villarroel⁩) remarkable findings: over 100,000 UFOs detected in the 50’s, PRE-SATELlTES, at the most prominent observatory in use
0:53

Available late tonight for YouTube members and tomorrow at 2 PM EST, 11 AM PST for everyone. The most in depth exploration of Beatriz’ (⁦Beatriz Villarroel⁩) remarkable findings: over 100,000 UFOs detected in the 50’s, PRE-SATELlTES, at the most prominent observatory in use

Jesse Michels

43,260 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Jake Barber says Skywatcher has filmed Tic Tac and Jellyfish UFOs Along with 7 other “classes” of UFOs “We had a lot of success with the Tic Tac in, in episode two, the filming of that, it showed up for several days in broad daylight dropping from above 80,000 feet. As everyone has heard, we pick it up on our radar, we track it, we image it through a number, number of different means. And so that's gonna be exciting to see because that's one of the ones that holds the most promise for an exciting conclusion right now.” “it literally just looks like a jellyfish, it looks like, like a head of a mushroom with tentacles in there. And there seems to be like electrical pulses that go up and down between the head and the tentacles.” Source -NewsNation 🔗 in comments
1:54

Jake Barber says Skywatcher has filmed Tic Tac and Jellyfish UFOs Along with 7 other “classes” of UFOs “We had a lot of success with the Tic Tac in, in episode two, the filming of that, it showed up for several days in broad daylight dropping from above 80,000 feet. As everyone has heard, we pick it up on our radar, we track it, we image it through a number, number of different means. And so that's gonna be exciting to see because that's one of the ones that holds the most promise for an exciting conclusion right now.” “it literally just looks like a jellyfish, it looks like, like a head of a mushroom with tentacles in there. And there seems to be like electrical pulses that go up and down between the head and the tentacles.” Source -NewsNation 🔗 in comments

neandrewthal

16,751 просмотров • 1 год назад

Brazil’s former Defense Minister just admitted that the 1996 Varginha UFO crash was real. Aldo Rebelo: “The phenomenon existed.” “The objects were there.” “The creature was seen.” “But what was it?” “Where did it come from?” “And why were they there?” Jesse Michels: “You’re speaking very casually about the phenomenon being real.” “I just want you to realize how historically unprecedented … it is that somebody of your caliber is saying that.” “Until this year, politicians all over the world … were professionally gaslighting and telling the public that this stuff is all fake.” Rebelo: “Why did the British Prime Minister organize a committee inside the Royal Air Force to study these phenomena?” “Why was there in the United States such dedication to the investigation of these phenomena?” “Why is it that in Brazil, the Army and the Air Force created a unit to monitor these phenomena?” “Why have pilots of jet fighters, formally educated and trained to deal with all types of airspace phenomena, reported on more than one occasion these phenomena in detail?” “Would they simply make up that they had an encounter with an object that moved at 25,000 km an hour?” “All the testimonials cannot be challenged.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy Aldo Rebelo James Fox
4:45

Brazil’s former Defense Minister just admitted that the 1996 Varginha UFO crash was real. Aldo Rebelo: “The phenomenon existed.” “The objects were there.” “The creature was seen.” “But what was it?” “Where did it come from?” “And why were they there?” Jesse Michels: “You’re speaking very casually about the phenomenon being real.” “I just want you to realize how historically unprecedented … it is that somebody of your caliber is saying that.” “Until this year, politicians all over the world … were professionally gaslighting and telling the public that this stuff is all fake.” Rebelo: “Why did the British Prime Minister organize a committee inside the Royal Air Force to study these phenomena?” “Why was there in the United States such dedication to the investigation of these phenomena?” “Why is it that in Brazil, the Army and the Air Force created a unit to monitor these phenomena?” “Why have pilots of jet fighters, formally educated and trained to deal with all types of airspace phenomena, reported on more than one occasion these phenomena in detail?” “Would they simply make up that they had an encounter with an object that moved at 25,000 km an hour?” “All the testimonials cannot be challenged.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy Aldo Rebelo James Fox

Holden Culotta

18,716 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Remembering the USB stick found in Germany with astonishing actual videos of Planets and UFOs in Space🧐🤔 Some time ago we reported that a man named Quisto, who lives in a small village near Berlin, Germany, found a USB stick with a strange symbol engraved on it in a parking lot near the so-called "Steintor". Later, he put the flash drive in his laptop, opened it and, to his surprise, saw many old images from the 1900s of what appeared to be planets, space and UFOs. According to Quisto, who has no idea who possessed the usb stick, he decided to share the 28 images on imgur hoping that someone has an answer to these mysterious images. According to the latest reports, the photos on Imgur have been removed under pressure from someone who does not want us to see these photos. In case the photos do not reappear on Imgur, we may place the entire set of photos on this site. Now footage has emerged showing not photos but actual video. Take a look!!!
3:40

Remembering the USB stick found in Germany with astonishing actual videos of Planets and UFOs in Space🧐🤔 Some time ago we reported that a man named Quisto, who lives in a small village near Berlin, Germany, found a USB stick with a strange symbol engraved on it in a parking lot near the so-called "Steintor". Later, he put the flash drive in his laptop, opened it and, to his surprise, saw many old images from the 1900s of what appeared to be planets, space and UFOs. According to Quisto, who has no idea who possessed the usb stick, he decided to share the 28 images on imgur hoping that someone has an answer to these mysterious images. According to the latest reports, the photos on Imgur have been removed under pressure from someone who does not want us to see these photos. In case the photos do not reappear on Imgur, we may place the entire set of photos on this site. Now footage has emerged showing not photos but actual video. Take a look!!!

UFO mania

617,518 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад