Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This astronomer quietly released the most irrefutable proof of UFOs ever. Beatriz Villarroel identified over 100,000 UFOs in photos of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. Her study is peer-reviewed. No one has debunked it. And these photos were all taken before we launched the...

152,251 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This is the most definitive proof of UFOs ever: Astronomer Beatriz Villarroel found 100,000+ “light-reflecting objects” on photographic plates of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. And her study is peer-reviewed. These light-reflecting objects, or “transients,” are not comets, asteroids, or satellites. They’re UFOs—more than 100,000 UFOs in the night sky over a period of just 10 years. That’s an average of at least 27 UFOs per day. And for some reason, Donald Menzel, who was rumored to be part of Majestic 12, was caught destroying the photographic plates that had this rock-solid evidence of UFOs. Jesse Michels: “Palomar … was the most prominent observatory in use between ‘49 and ‘57, pre-Sputnik.” UAP Gerb: “And isn’t there data that Donald Menzel … was one of the ones stripping some of these plates out?” Michels: “That is from a book by Dorrit Hoffleit, who … was at Harvard with Donald Menzel and writes about this.” “Donald Menzel not only held extremely high clearances in just about every agency you could name, he was rumored to be Majestic 12.” “And he’s the guy caught destroying plates by somebody who’s very reputable, Dorrit Hoffleit.” “I think if you get one other observatory—if it’s pretty correlated, they have transients also from 1949 to 1957 that line up with what Beatriz finds, to me, that’s game over for disclosure.” “You’re talking about light-reflecting objects that aren’t comets, meteorites, meteoroids, asteroids, it’s not satellites.” “She’s clearly debunked all of that enough for … them to peer-review it.” Jesse Michels Gerb Beatriz Villarroel

Holden Culotta

63,280 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨Dr. Beatriz Villarroel Interview With Peter Skafish for the Sol Foundation The conversation turned from astronomy to something much stranger, and potentially historic. Villarroel’s team, working through the VASCO Project, had already published peer reviewed evidence of artificial reflective objects in Earth orbit before Sputnik. But she and collaborator Steven Bruehl have uncovered something else, a triangle of correlations linking transient sky events, above ground nuclear test detonations and well documented UAP sightings. “Steven Bruehl took the samples of nuclear tests, the VASCO transients, and the UFO catalog,” Villarroel explained. “He asked whether these coincidences during events like the 1952 Washington D.C. flap were statistically connected.” The result was a measurable correlation around 3 sigma between UFO events and nuclear tests, and similar correlations linking transients, UAPs and transients and nuclear detonations. That may sound subtle, but statistically, a 3 sigma signal means it’s very unlikely to be random noise, and it directly contradicts the claim that these photographic transients were simply plate defects. “If it were just plate defects, you wouldn’t see correlations appear in time with nuclear tests or UFO flaps,” she said. “This defies that hypothesis.” The idea that nuclear activity attracts non human observation has been part of UFO lore since the 1940s. Now, for the first time, there’s a data driven bridge between the legends and empirical evidence, connecting transient light events, nuclear detonations, and UAP activity. Skafish summed it up: “You don’t just have a correlation between two things, you’ve got a correlation between three, and in all directions.” Whether that means surveillance, energy resonance, or a reactive phenomenon isn’t yet clear. But Villarroel’s work gives future scientists a map of places and times where something, perhaps watching, perhaps responding, seems to manifest when humanity tampers with atomic fire. Watch The Full Interview Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #SolFoundation #VASCOProject #UAP #NuclearCorrelation #Disclosure #SkywatchSignal

Skywatch Signal

16,527 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🪞 What are these Transients? 🪞 "I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes?" ~Beatriz "Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious." ~SH (I tweeted out SH's video yesterday, and today, I decided to transcribe it bc she does a very good job summarizing the issues at hand. She has a Bachelor's degree in mathematics and a PhD in physics.) Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "Today, I have a group of astrophysicists who found the most convincing evidence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena that I've seen. Concretely, they say they have images of likely artificial objects that were in orbit around Earth before we had the first satellites up there. I've had a look. "This research comes from astrophysicists at Nordita (the Nordic Institute of Theoretical Physics - Nordita) in Stockholm, and they just published two papers. They used a catalog of old photographic plates from 1949 to 1957 taken in California at Caltech that have been digitized. "Why until 1957? Because in 1957 the Russians launched the first ever satellite into orbit, or at least the first satellite that we know of. In those scans of old photographic plates, they look for bright spots that appear only briefly, which are called transients. They did this first by computer analysis, but then also by just looking at the images. "Here is an example of two images of the exact same spot in the sky taken briefly after each other. One shows, well, something. The other one, not. But these old image scans can contain defects and dust and so on, so they only considered cases where the transients were in the same place in multiple scans of the same photographic plate. Then one can be sure that at least it's not an artifact from the scan. "They found a total of five such transients, and they aren't single dots. They are configurations of four, five, and in one case, six dots in a row. And one of those with five in a row is dated to July 27, 1952. No, that isn't my birthday. This is the weekend of one of the famous Washington DC UFO days, known as the Washington flap. On this day, and also a week earlier, air traffic controllers at the city's main airport and nearby Air Force Base said they saw things on radar that shouldn't have been there. Some pilots and people on the ground also reported unusual lights. The fuss was big enough that the Air Force held a press conference on July 29th and blamed atmospheric phenomena." Maj. General John A. Stamford: "We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States." Sabine: "But back to the astrophysicists with their papers. They also look at all these transients, so not just those that appear in multiple scans. From this, they find that the transients are far less likely to appear in the Earth's shadow. This is statistically significant at 22 sigma. What this means is that the transients are likely to be from something that reflects sunlight, and it makes it unlikely that it's something to do with the camera. "If that was already confusing enough, in the other paper, they look at correlations between all transients and reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and nuclear tests. They find a weak correlation with UAP reports, other transients were 35% more likely within a one-day window around a nuclear bomb test. This pattern is hard to blame on bad film alone. "They consider different explanations on the papers, such as foreground objects, but these would be much more blurry or camera glitches, but these would not disappear in the Earth's shadow. It could have something to do with the nuclear fallout, but again, why would this disappear in the Earth's shadow? "Beatriz Villarroel, one of the authors of both papers, told me by email: "With my existing limited knowledge, these objects look highly artificial to me. Only something really planar and reflective can give off those transients. Any round or rough body would result in streaks, and I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes -it's open for speculation." ~Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (planar: having a flat or level surface that continues in all directions. ~Cambridge Dictionary) Sabine: "It's possible, but it seems highly unlikely to me, that any nation had multiple satellites in the sky before the Russian Sputnik launch. This is because it isn't all that easy to launch a rocket without anyone noticing, and you can't do it from anywhere, either. 'It's possible that these objects are of natural origin, but then what are they? Or are they image artifacts that are more likely to occur in sunlight? Maybe something to do with solar wind? I don't have a good explanation, and honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about this one way or the other, I just find it very curious. Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious. Five dots in a row? That's very disciplined dust. What do you think about this? Is it aliens?"

Joe Murgia

17,157 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад